Skip to main content

Table 4 Changes in number of associations that are graded as having convincing evidence when one criterion is dropped or replaced by a more lenient version

From: Validity of observational evidence on putative risk and protective factors: appraisal of 3744 meta-analyses on 57 topics

Credibility assessment

N associations (total=1457)a

Proportion

Convincing

99

6.8%

 Replace P < 10−6 by <0.001

134

9.2%

 Replace P < 10−6 by < 0.05

142

9.7%

 Without the minimum number of cases criterion

149

10.2%

 Without the largest study at p < 0.05 criterion

103

7.1%

 Without the 95% prediction interval criterion

106

7.3%

 Without the heterogeneity I2<50% criterion

159

10.9%

 Without the small study effects criterion

122

8.4%

 Without the excess significance criterion

111

7.6%

  1. aThese are the associations that are statistically significant (P < 0.05) and also have information on all criteria