Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of included articles

From: Risk of bias in observational studies using routinely collected data of comparative effectiveness research: a meta-research study

 

N = 77 (%)

Name of journal

 - NEJM

3 (4)

 - The Lancet

2 (3)

 - JAMA

13 (17)

 - Annals of Internal Medicine

9 (11)

 - BMJ

14 (18)

 - PLoS Medicine

8 (11)

 - Circulation

7 (9)

 - European Heart Journal

4 (5)

 - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

15 (19)

Location of corresponding authors

 - North America

40 (52)

 - Europe

25 (32)

 - Asia

10 (13)

 - North American and Europe

1 (1)

 - International

1 (1)

Study design

 - Cohort study

67 (87)

 - Not clearly reported

10 (13)

Treatment evaluated

 - Pharmacological treatment

53 (69)

 - Non-pharmacological treatment

23 (30)

 - Both

1 (1)

Comparator

 - Active comparator

49 (63)

 - Usual care

17 (22)

 - No treatment

11 (14)

Median sample size [min–max]

24,000 [9100–80,000]

Data sourcea

 - Registry

34 (44)

 - Electronic health record

17 (22)

 - Health administration data

14 (18)

 - Health insurance claims data

20 (26)

 - Others

11 (14)

Funding source

 - Not for profit

43 (56)

 - For profit

7 (9)

 - Both

12 (16)

 - No funding

5 (6)

 - Unclear

10 (13)

Research transparency practices

 - Using a reporting guideline

7 (9)

 - Code and algorithm used to classify exposures provided in supplementary documents

57 (74)

 - Code and algorithm used to classify outcomes provided in supplementary documents

60 (78)

 - A statement to provide data upon request

10 (13)

  1. aOne study might have more than one type of data sources