Parameter type | Definition | Data sources and approach to estimation | Table in Additional file 1 with estimates, uncertainty, and references |
---|---|---|---|
Prevalence of “latent progressor” state among each cohort considered for TPT | Latent infections that will progress to active (symptomatic) TB disease at some time in the future | Lifetime cumulative incidence extrapolated from observed 12-month incidence (PWH cohort) or baseline prevalence (household contacts) using published cohort studies and meta-analyses | Table S1 |
Prevalence of “subclinical progressor” state among each cohort considered for TPT | TB disease that is undetectable by a symptom screen but is microbiologically active and will eventually progress to active disease if untreated | Primary clinical data (Table 2): Symptom-negative individuals who progressed to active TB within 3 months (PWH) or who were diagnosed with TB during extensive baseline evaluation (household contacts, with adjustment for expected spontaneous resolution). | Table S1 |
Efficacy of TPT for latent progressors, by regimen | Proportion of latent progressions prevented, if initially susceptible to the TPT regimen and completes enough TPT to be at risk for acquired resistance | Network meta-analysis of clinical trial data, adjusted for reinfection, nonadherence, and baseline drug resistance. 6H efficacy parametrized relative to 4R and assumed equal or less than 4R. | Table S2 |
Reduction in TPT efficacy when used during subclinical TB | Proportion of TPT-preventable latent progressions that cannot be cured by TPT at the subclinical progressor stage | Bounded by the efficacy of TPT for latent TB and by the efficacy of monotherapy for symptomatic active TB. | Table S2 |
Risk of acquiring resistance to the TPT drug, if latent TB progresses despite TPT | Applies to those whose TPT is unsuccessful and whose initial infections were not drug-resistant. | Incidence of drug-resistant TB after TPT in clinical trials, adjusted for expected incidence from pre-existing drug resistance. Risk for isoniazid sets an upper bound on risk for rifampicin. | Table S3 |
Risk of acquiring resistance to the TPT drug, if subclinical TB progresses despite TPT | As above | Treatment trials with a single effective drug. Large uncertainty is reflected in wide parameter distributions. | Table S3 |
Outcomes after active TB treatment | Risk of failure/relapse, with or without acquired isoniazid or rifampicin resistance, as a function of initial susceptibilities. | Previous reviews of clinical trial and research cohort outcomes. Weighted based on the regimens expected to be used in present-day programmatic settings, including the use of first-line regimens when drug resistance goes undetected. | Table S4 |
Prevalence and overlap of INH and RIF resistance | Same for subclinical cases and latent progressors | Drug resistance survey data; lower in contacts of DS-TB patients than among all TB infections | Table S4 |
Baseline drug resistance | Prevalence and overlap of isoniazid and rifampicin resistance among TB infections in a modeled cohort. | National or regional drug resistance survey data, adjusted downward for household contacts of known DS-TB patients | Table S5 |