Skip to main content

Table 2 Details of the development of the risk scores used for the external validation

From: External validation of models for predicting risk of colorectal cancer using the China Kadoorie Biobank

Author (year) Study size (cases of CRC) Model type Country Cancer outcome Model evaluated in M or F
Driver (2007) [25] 21,581 (485) Logistic regression USA CRC, C, R M
Ma Point (2010) [12] 18,256 (543) Point score Japan CRC, C, R M
Ma Cox (2010) [12] 18,256 (543) Logistic regression Japan CRC, C, R M
Guo (2020) [28] 92,923 (353) Point score China CRC M
Chen (2014) [29] 905 (38 CRC; 100 AP) Point score China CRC Both
Betes (2003) [31] 2210 (270) Point score Spain CRC Both
Aleksandrova (2021) [30] 255,482 (3645) Logistic regression Europe CRC Both
Imperiale (2021) [26] 3025 (284) Logistic regression USA CRC Both
Hong (2017) [27] 21,762 (1117) Logistic regression Korea CRC Both