Skip to main content

Table 6 Characteristics of selected core sets of quality indicators

From: Validation of patient- and GP-reported core sets of quality indicators for older adults with multimorbidity in primary care: results of the cross-sectional observational MULTIqual validation study

 

Validity

Discriminative capacity

Feasibility

Patient-professional agreement

Item-total

Factor loadingsa

Performance

Floor effects

Ceiling effects

Documentation

Missing values

Positive

Negative

GP-reported quality indicators

 Eliciting patient preferences (n = 323)

0.576

0.673

46.1%

11.8%

5.9%

69.1%

6.6%

49.4%

61.0%

 Quality of life assessment (n = 321)

0.512

0.643

80.1%

2.9%

28.6%

60.3%

7.2%

-g

-g

 Mutual agreement on treatment goals (n = 313)

0.501

0.612

48.6%

11.4%

2.9%

73.0%

9.5%

54.1%

54.4%

 Assessment of treatment burden (n = 308)

0.435

0.613

75.0%

2.9%

31.4%

57.0%

11.0%

43.5%

42.8%

 Medication review (n = 295)b

0.423

0.476

39.0%

41.2%

11.8%

62.3%

12.7%

54.1%

43.4%

 Training of non-physician staff addressing multimorbidity (n = 35)c

0.416

0.479

60.6%

-e

-e

-f

5.7%

-g

-g

 Monitoring adherence to treatment (n = 313)

0.387

0.474

47.0%

14.7%

8.8%

50.3%

9.5%

-g

-g

 Monitoring of pain management (n = 203)d

0.385

0.430

67.0%

5.9%

26.5%

65.4%

1.5%

-g

-g

 Involving partner, family and caregivers (n = 317)

0.376

0.431

33.8%

35.3%

5.9%

72.0%

8.4%

36.1%

59.8%

 Training of physician staff addressing multimorbidity (n = 35)b

0.372

0.438

71.4%

-e

-e

-f

0%

-g

-g

 Proactive pain assessment (n = 324)

0.335

0.423

62.3%

2.9%

17.1%

69.8%

6.4%

47.8%

53.2%

 Information about benefits and harms of treatment options (n = 318)

0.332

0.488

89.0%

2.9%

34.3%

59.2%

8.1%

75.9%

24.1%

Patient-reported quality indicators

 Eliciting patient preferences (n = 323)

0.440

0.535

41.2%

11.4%

2.9%

-i

6.6%

49.4%

61.0%

 Assessment of treatment burden (n = 329)

0.370

0.459

24.6%

28.6%

0%

-i

4.9%

43.5%

42.8%

 Information about medication (n = 227)h

0.362

0.311

84.1%

0%

91.4%

-i

12.4%

90.7%

5.1%

 Mutual agreement on treatment goals (n = 334)

0.348

0.446

50.3%

8.6%

5.7%

-i

3.5%

54.1%

54.4%

 Proactive pain assessment (n = 327)

0.345

0.436

30.9%

14.3%

0%

-i

5.5%

47.8%

53.2%

 Medication review (n = 336)b

0.343

0.416

69.1%

2.9%

5.7%

-i

0.9%

54.1%

43.4%

 Assigning responsibility for coordination of care (n = 332)

0.339

0.421

44.0%

11.4%

0%

-i

4.0%

33.3%

61.8%

  1. aResults from explorative factor analysis with one extracted factor (eigenvalue 3.48)
  2. bExcluding patients without medication (n = 8)
  3. cMeasured on GP level
  4. dExcluding patients without chronic pain (n = 138)
  5. eCeiling effects are equal to the rate of fulfilment and floor effects are equal to rate of non-fulfilment
  6. fDue to indicator definition, documentation rate is 100%
  7. gNo patient indicator defined
  8. hExcluding patients without continuous medication (n = 6) and if medication was prescribed by specialist (n = 81)
  9. iNot assessed for patient-reported indicators
  10. GP, general practitioner; n, number of participants