Skip to main content

Table 2 Associations between quintiles of PDI, hPDI, and uPDI and aging trajectories based on multinomial logistic regression model

From: Association between plant-based dietary pattern and biological aging trajectory in a large prospective cohort

Diet index

Median of diet index

Medium-degree vs slow aging

High-degree vs slow aging

Na

OR (95% CI)

p-trend

Na

OR (95% CI)

p-trend

Quintile of PDI (N)

 Q1 (2402)

36

1241

Ref

 < 0.0001

145

Ref

0.0050

 Q2 (2038)

39

969

0.89 (0.77, 1.03)

96

0.67 (0.49, 0.92)

 Q3 (2072)

40

938

0.78 (0.68, 0.90)

93

0.67 (0.50, 0.91)

 Q4 (1753)

42

723

0.69 (0.59, 0.79)

71

0.62 (0.45, 0.86)

 Q5 (1926)

45

822

0.75 (0.65, 0.86)

89

0.63 (0.46, 0.86)

Per 10, unit increment of PDI

  

0.74 (0.66, 0.84)

  

0.70 (0.53, 0.92)

 

Quintile of hPDI (N)

 Q1 (2080)

45

1053

Ref

 < 0.0001

118

Ref

0.0004

 Q2 (1787)

48

869

0.88 (0.77, 1.01)

92

0.79 (0.59, 1.06)

 Q3 (2144)

49

956

0.76 (0.64, 0.90)

99

0.62 (0.42, 0.91)

 Q4 (1981)

51

874

0.71 (0.62, 0.81)

85

0.58 (0.43, 0.78)

 Q5 (2199)

54

941

0.73 (0.62, 0.85)

100

0.62 (0.44, 0.88)

Per 10, unit increment of hPDI

  

0.73 (0.65, 0.82)

  

0.65 (0.50, 0.85)

 

Quintile of uPDI (N)

 Q1 (1851)

41

733

Ref

 < 0.0001

78

Ref

0.0114

 Q2 (2059)

45

888

1.11 (0.97, 1.28)

109

1.27 (0.92, 1.74)

 Q3 (1809)

47

824

1.18 (1.02, 1.36)

72

0.93 (0.65, 1.31)

 Q4 (2316)

50

1095

1.27 (1.11, 1.45)

114

1.24 (0.90, 1.70)

 Q5 (2156)

53

1153

1.72 (1.48, 1.99)

121

1.70 (1.21, 2.38)

Per 10, unit increment of uPDI

  

1.43 (1.30, 1.58)

  

1.39 (1.11, 1.75)

 
  1. Slow aging: slow aging trajectory, Medium-degree: medium-degree accelerated aging trajectory, High-degree: high-degree accelerated aging trajectory. Na: Number of participants in medium-degree accelerated aging trajectory or high-degree accelerated aging trajectory. Model adjusted for age, gender, education level, marital status, smoking status, drinking status, and chronic disease count