Skip to main content

Table 5 The artefactual explanation

From: A roadmap for sex- and gender-disaggregated health research

Suppose that the 10-year disease risk in the absence of a risk factor (i.e. the reference group) is 1% in women and 3% in men. In other words, women have a third the risk of men, which — as mentioned already — broadly is the case for CVD (although attenuating with age). When the risk in those with the risk factor is 1% higher in both sexes, this results in a relative risk of 2/1 = 2 in women and of 4/3 = 1.33 in men. That is, women have a 2/1.33 = 1.5 times higher excess risk compared to men when they have the risk factor, even though the risk factor increases the risk by the same amount in both sexes. Thus, some would conclude that this implies that a finding of a higher relative risk in women is purely an artificial finding due to the lower background risk in women and the mathematical (statistical) metric used to compare the sexes