Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of included studies

From: Comparative effectiveness of multiple different treatment regimens for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Author

Year

Region

Race

Follow-up

Number of patients

Intervention

BMI of baseline (mean)

Glycated haemoglobin of baseline

Diet control and exercise

Fan, H [49]

2013

Beijing, China

Asian

12 weeks

Group 1: 49

Group 1: Exenatide 20 μg/d

Group 1: 28.18

7–9%

Yes

Group 2: 68

Group 2: Metformin 1 g/d

Group 2: 27.61

Dasarathy, S [50]

2015

America

Caucasian

48 weeks

Group 1: 18

Group 1: Omega 3 3.6 g/d

Group 1: 34.8

 < 8.5%

Yes

Group 2: 19

Group 2: Standard treatment

Group 2: 35.7

Feng, W [68]

2017

Nanjing, China

Asian

24 weeks

Group 1: 29

Group 1: Liraglutide 1.8 mg/d

Group 1: 28.12

7–14%

Yes

Group 2: 29

Group 2: Gliclazide 30–120 mg/d

Group 2: 27.85

Group 3: 29

Group 3: Metformin 2 g/d

Group 3: 26.82

Ito, D [51]

2017

Saitama, Japan

Asian

24 weeks

Group 1: 34

Group 1: Pioglitazone 15 or 30 mg/d

Group 1: 29.9

7–11%

No

Group 2: 32

Group 2: Ipragliflozin 50 mg/d

Group 2: 30.7

Eriksson, JW [53]

2018

Sweden

Caucasian

12 weeks

Group 1: 19

Group 1: Standard treatment

Group 1: 30.3

NA

No

Group 2: 15

Group 2: Omega 3 4 g/d

Group 2: 33.0

Group 3: 19

Group 3: Dapagliflozin 10 mg/d

Group 3: 30.5

Shimizu, M [54]

2019

America

Hispanic

24 weeks

Group 1: 33

Group 1: Dapagliflozin 5 mg/d

Group 1: 27.6

6–12%

No

Group 2: 24

Group 2: Standard treatment

Group 2: 28.7

Feng, W H [55]

2019

China

Asian

24 weeks

Group 1: 29

Group 1: Liraglutide 1.8 mg/d

Group 1: 28.1

7–14%

Yes

Group 2: 29

Group 2: Metformin 2 g/d

Group 2: 26.8

Group 3: 27

Group 3: Gliclazide 30–120 mg/d

Group 3: 27.5

Aso, Y [69]

2019

Japan

Asian

24 weeks

Group 1: 33

Group 1: Dapagliflozin 5 mg/d

Group 1: 27.6

6–12%

No

Group 2: 24

Group 2: Standard treatment

Group 2: 28.7

Liu, L [56]

2020

Shanghai, China

Asian

24 weeks

Group 1: 35

Group 1: Exenatide 20 μg/d

Group 1: 28.49

7–10%

No

Group 2: 36

Group 2: Insulin glargine 0.1–0.3 IU/kg

Group 2: 27.84

Zhang, L Y[57]

2020

Hispanic

Asian

24 weeks

Group 1: 30

Group 1: Liraglutide 1.2 mg/d

Group 1: 27.6

7–14%

Yes

Group 2: 30

Group 2: Pioglitazone 30 mg/d

Group 2: 27.1

Kinoshita, T [59]

2020

Japan

Asian

28 weeks

Group 1: 33

Group 1: Pioglitazone 7.5–15 mg/d

Group 1: 28.7

 ≥ 6.5%

No

Group 2: 32

Group 2: Dapagliflozin 5 mg/d

Group 2: 29.5

Group 3: 33

Group 2: Glimepiride 0.5– 1 mg/d

Group 3: 28.4

Guo, W [60]

2020

Fujian, China

Asian

26 weeks

Group 1: 30

Group 1: Insulin glargine 10 IU/d

Group 1: 28.3

 ≥ 6.5%

Yes

Group 2: 31

Group 2: Liraglutide 1.8 mg/d

Group 2: 29.2

Group 3: 30

Group 3: Metformin

Group 3: 28.6

Sangouni, AA [61]

2021

Yazd, Iran

Asian

12 weeks

Group 1: 28

Group 1: Omega 3 2 g/d

Group 1: 30.26

NA

Yes

Group 2: 28

Group 2: Metformin

Group 2: 29.8

Tian, F [63]

2018

China

Asian

12 weeks

Group 1: 52

Group 1: Liraglutide 0.6–1.2 mg/d

Group 1: 28.18

 < 9%

Yes

Group 2: 75

Group 2: Metformin 1–1.5 g/d

Group 2: 27.61

Bando, Y [70]

2017

Japan

Asian

12 weeks

Group 1: 40

Group 1: Ipragliflozin 50 mg/d

Group 1: 27.8

7–10%

Yes

Group 2: 22

Group 2: Standard treatment

Group 2: 27.3

Cho, K Y [71]

2021

Japan

Asian

24 weeks

Group 1: 27

Group 1: Dapagliflozin 5 mg/d

NA

6.5–8.5%

No

Group 2: 26

Group 2: Pioglitazone 30 mg/d

Phrueksotsai, S [62]

2021

Thailand

Asian

12 weeks

Group 1: 18

Group 1: Dapagliflozin 10 mg/d

Group 1: 29.6

7–10%

No

Group 2: 20

Group 2: Standard treatment

Group 2: 28.8

Kuchay, MS [52]

2018

India

Asian

20 weeks

Group 1: 20

Group 1: Standard treatment

Group 1: 29.4

7–10%

No

Group 2: 22

Group 2: Empagliflozin10mg/d

Group 2: 30.0

Chehrehgosha, H [72]

2021

Iran

Asian

24 weeks

Group 1: 37

Group 1: Standard treatment

Group 1: 30.2

7–10%

Yes

Group 2: 35

Group 2: Empagliflozin 10 mg/d

Group 2: 30.9

Group 3: 26

Group 3: Pioglitazone 30 mg/d

Group 3: 29.4

Deng, XL [67]

2017

China

Asian

26 weeks

Group 1: 36

Group 1: Sitagliptin 50 mg/d

Group 1: 24.1

NA

Yes

Group 2: 36

Group 2: Standard treatment

Group 2: 23.9

Yoneda, M [58]

2021

Japan

Asian

24 weeks

Group 1: 19

Group 1: Pioglitazone 15–30 mg/d

Group 1: 30.8

 ≥ 6.5%

Yes

Group 2: 21

Group 2: Tofogliflozin 20 mg/d

Group 2: 29.4

Takeshita, Y [64]

2022

Japan

Asian

48 weeks

Group 1: 20

Group 1: Tofogliflozin 20 mg/d

Group 1: 31.0

7.3–8.8%

Yes

Group 2: 20

Group 2: Glimepiride 0.5 mg/d

Group 2: 32.0

Hiruma, S [65]

2023

Japan

Asian

12 weeks

Group 1: 23

Group 1: Empagliflozin10mg/d

Group 1: 30.6

 < 10%

No

Group 2: 19

Group 2: Sitagliptin 100 mg/d

Group 2: 28.6

Nar, A [66]

2009

Turkey

Caucasian

24 weeks

Group 1: 19

Group 1: Metformin 1.7 g/d

Group 1: 31.0

NA

Yes

Group 2: 15

Group 2: Standard treatment

Group 2: 33.7