Skip to main content

Table 5 Mixed-model analyses of echocardiography in CHD

From: Effects of 6-month customized home-based exercise on motor development, bone strength, and parental stress in children with simple congenital heart disease: a single-blinded randomized clinical trial

 

F value

95% CI

p value

CHD

 LVDd

0.04

 − 1.16–1.24

0.945

 LVDs

0.03

 − 0.83–0.89

0.941

 LVPWd

0.08

 − 0.14–0.29

0.484

 LVPWs

0.23

 − 0.10–0.56

0.175

 LVEF

0.44

 − 0.49–1.38

0.348

 MPA

 − 0.04

 − 0.23–0.15

0.657

 MV

0.00

 − 0.02–0.02

0.851

 TV

0.01

 − 0.02–0.01

0.516

ASD

 LVDd

0.89

 − 0.42–2.21

0.176

 LVDs

0.59

 − 0.48–1.65

0.271

 LVPWd

0.27

 − 0.08–0.63

0.126

 LVPWs

0.74

0.16–1.32

0.014*

 LVEF

0.31

 − 2.11–2.73

0.795

 MPA

 − 0.02

 − 0.36–0.32

0.918

 MV

0.01

 − 0.04–0.06

0.678

 TV

 − 0.00

 − 0.05–0.04

0.896

 Z score of LVDd

0.05

 − 0.35–0.45

0.799

 Z score of LVDs

0.32

 − 0.05–0.68

0.086

 Z score of LVPWd

 − 0.03

 − 0.40–0.33

0.847

 Z score of LVPWs

0.12

 − 0.34–0.58

0.601

 Z score of Ao

 − 0.26

 − 0.86–0.34

0.389

VSD

 LVDd

 − 1.16

 − 2.23 to − 0.08

0.036*

 LVDs

 − 0.62

 − 1.47–0.22

0.147

 LVPWd

 − 0.27

 − 0.67–0.13

0.182

 LVPWs

 − 0.52

 − 1.09 –0.05

0.073

 LVEF

0.05

 − 1.27–1.37

0.939

 MPA

 − 0.02

 − 0.10–0.06

0.613

 MV

0.00

 − 0.04–0.04

0.852

 TV

 − 0.01

 − 0.04–0.03

0.589

 Z score of LVDd

 − 0.22

 − 0.48–0.04

0.097

 Z score of LVDs

 − 0.47

 − 0.83 to − 0.10

0.012*

 Z score of LVPWd

 − 0.20

 − 0.49–0.10

0.183

 Z score of LVPWs

 − 0.74

 − 1.19 to − 0.30

0.002*

 Z score of Ao

0.13

 − 0.26–0.53

0.510

PDA

 LVDd

0.00

 − 1.50–2.00

0.997

 LVDs

 − 0.05

 − 1.21–1.11

0.935

 LVPWd

 − 0.07

 − 0.37–0.22

0.624

 LVPWs

 − 0.31

 − 0.77–0.15

0.187

 LVEF

1.20

 − 0.84–3.24

0.242

 MPA

 − 0.04

 − 0.11–0.03

0.285

 MV

 − 0.02

 − 0.06–0.02

0.334

 TV

 − 0.01

 − 0.04–0.02

0.595

 Z score of LVDd

 − 0.13

 − 0.43–0.17

0.394

 Z score of LVDs

0.29

 − 0.06–0.64

0.099

 Z score of LVPWd

 − 0.10

 − 0.45–0.25

0.558

 Z score of LVPWs

0.10

 − 0.27–0.47

0.601

 Z score of Ao

0.18

 − 0.31–0.66

0.476

PS

 LVDd

 − 0.04

 − 1.69–1.61

0.965

 LVDs

 − 0.85

 − 2.26–0.56

0.227

 LVPWd

 − 0.01

 − 0.43–0.42

0.980

 LVPWs

 − 0.44

 − 1.35–0.48

0.334

 LVEF

1.28

 − 1.01–3.58

0.259

 MPA

0.25

 − 0.24–0.73

0.305

 MV

0.01

 − 0.05–0.08

0.677

 TV

 − 0.04

 − 0.09–0.02

0.170

 Z score of LVDd

 − 0.32

 − 0.84–0.20

0.217

 Z score of LVDs

 − 0.07

 − 0.61–0.48

0.803

 Z score of LVPWd

 − 0.41

 − 0.98–0.15

0.145

 Z score of LVPWs

 − 0.21

 − 1.08–0.66

0.624

 Z score of Ao

 − 0.59

 − 1.04 to − 0.14

0.013*

  1. In this table, we compared trends of echocardiography in CHD subtypes separately between the intervention and the control group using mixed effects modeling. F values of fixed effects were reported
  2. ASD Atrial septal defect, LVDd Left ventricular end diastolic dimension, LVDs Left ventricular end-systolic dimension, LVEF Left ventricular ejection fraction, LVPWd Left ventricular posterior wall depth, LVPWs Left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end-systole, MPA Main pulmonary artery diameter, MV Mitral blood flow velocity, PDA Patent ductus arteriosus, PS Pulmonary stenosis, TV Tricuspid blood flow velocity, VSD Ventricular septal defect
  3. * means significant difference (p < 0.017)
Back to article page

BMC Medicine

ISSN: 1741-7015

Contact us