Skip to main content

Table 4 Meta-analyses effectiveness results: psychosocial outcomes

From: The effectiveness, implementation, and experiences of peer support approaches for mental health: a systematic umbrella review

Author (year)

Outcome

N of studies (N of participants)

Population

Effect measure

Effect size (95% CI), p-value

Heterogeneity, I2, 95% CI, χ2, df

AMSTAR2

Summary findings

Hope

 Fuhr et al. (2014) [37]

Hope (up to 6 months follow-up)

3 (967)

Adult service users with an SMI or depression diagnosis

SMD, Z

0.24 (0.02, 0.46), Z = 2.16 (p = 0.03)

I2 = 65%, Tau2 = 0.02; χ2 = 5.74 (df = 2, p = 0.06)

Low

Significant improvement in hope

 Lloyd-Evans et al. (2014) [22]

Hope (post-intervention)

4 (1072)

Adults with SMI or those using secondary MH services

SMD

 − 0.14 (− 0.27, − 0.02)

I2 = 7%, χ2 = 3.21 (p = 0.36)

Low

Significant improvement in hope

 Peck et al. (2023) [40]a

Hopefulness (time frame not stated)

6 (1155)

Adults, majority diagnosed with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or major affective disorders

SMD, Z

0.31 (0.13, 0.49), Z = 3.35 (p = 0.0008)

I2 = 46%, Tau2 = 0.02, χ2 = 9.30 (df = 5, p = 0.10)

Critically low

Significant improvement in hopefulness

 Wang et al. (2022) [44]

Hope (last follow-up)

4 (1000)

Adult individuals or family members with SMI

SMD

0.27 (0.06, 0.49); Z = 2.51, p = 0.01

I2 = 58%; Tau2 = 0.03; χ2 = 7.16 (df = 3; p = 0.07)

Critically low

Significant improvement in hope

 Lyons et al. (2021) [35]b

Hope (post-intervention)

3 (1029)

Adults with any mental health condition (including SMI)

MD

0.18 (− 0.34, 0.69), p = 0.50

I2 = 0%, χ2 = 1.68 (df = 2)

Critically low

No effect

 Sun et al. (2022) [43]b

Hopelessness (post-intervention)

2 (114)

Adults and adolescents with any mental health problem including MH service users without reported diagnoses

SMD

 − 0.16 (− 0.52, 0.19), p = 0.37

I2 = 0%, χ2 = 0 (df = 1, p = 0.99)

Critically low

No effect

Hope: follow-up

 Lloyd-Evans et al. (2014) [22]

Hope (3–6 month follow-up)

3 (967)

Adults with SMI or those using secondary MH services

SMD

 − 0.24 (− 0.46, − 0.02)

I2 = 65%, χ2 = 5.74 (p = 0.06)

Low

Significant improvement in hope

 Chien et al. (2019) [21]

Hope SHS scale, medium term (1–6 months)

2 (789)

Adults with schizophrenia or similar SMI

MD, Z

0.37 (− 0.22,0.96), Z = 1.22, p < 0.22

I2 = 0%, Tau2 = 0; χ2 = 0.01 (df = 1, p = 0.91)

High

No effect

 Chien et al. (2019) [21]

Hope SHS scale, long term (> 6 months)

3 (809)

Adults with schizophrenia or similar SMI

MD, Z

0.41 (− 0.15, 0.97), Z = 1.44 (p = 0.15)

I2 = 0%, Tau2 = 0, χ2 = 1.48 (df = 2, p = 0.48)

High

No effect

Empowerment

 Burke et al. (2019) [51]

Empowerment (group intervention, end of treatment)

5 (923)

Adults (including veterans) with any mental health problem

Hedges’ g

0.19 (0.03, 0.36), p = 0.02

I2 = 30%, Tau2 = 0.01, Q = 5.69, p = 0.22

Critically low

Significant improvement in empowerment end of treatment

 Peck et al. (2023) [40]a

Empowerment (time frame not stated)

3 (348)

Adults, majority diagnosed with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or major affective disorders

SMD, Z

0.46 (0.25, 0.67), Z = 4.20 (p < .0001)

I2 = 0%, Tau2 = 0; χ2 = 1.69 (df = 2, p = 0.43)

Critically low

Significant improvement in empowerment

 Lloyd-Evans et al. (2014) [22]

Empowerment (post-intervention)

2 (286)

Adults with SMI or those using secondary MH services

SMD

 − 2.67 (− 7.35, 2.02)

I2 = 97%, χ2 = 38.87 (p < 0.001)

Low

No effect

 Lyons et al. (2021) [35]b

Empowerment (post-intervention)

4 (750)

Adults with any mental health condition (including SMI)

SMD

0.17 (− 0.07, 0.40), p = 0.17

I2 = 55%, χ2 = 6.67 (df = 3)

Critically low

No effect

 Sun et al. (2022) [43]b

Empowerment (post-intervention)

3 (245)

Adults and adolescents with any mental health problem including MH service users without reported diagnoses

SMD

0.24 (− 0.01, − 0.50), p = 0.06

I2 = 0%, χ2 = 0.86 (df = 2, p = 0.65)

Critically low

No effect

 Wang et al. (2022) [44]

Empowerment (last follow-up)

4 (2380)

Adult individuals or family members with SMI

SMD

–0.37 (–0.91, 0.17); Z = 1.34, p = 0.18

I2 = 94%; Tau2 = 0.24; χ2 = 52.72 (df = 3, p < .00001)

Critically low

No effect

Empowerment: follow-up

 Lloyd-Evans et al. (2014) [22]

Empowerment (6 months follow-up)

2 (538)

Adults with SMI or those using secondary MH services

SMD

 − 0.25 (− 0.43, − 0.07)

I2 = 12%, χ2 = 1.13 (p = 0.29)

Low

Significant improvement in empowerment

 White et al. (2020) [45]a

Empowerment (6–12 months follow-up)

4 (519)

Adults using mental health services with any diagnoses

SMD, Z

0.23 (0.04, 0.42), Z = 2.31, p = 0.02

I2 = 14%, Tau2 = 0.01; χ2 = 3.48 (df = 3, p = 0.32)

Critically low

Significant improvement in empowerment

 Lyons et al. (2021) [35]b

Empowerment (3 weeks–6 months follow-up)

4 (750)

Adults with mental health conditions

SMD

0.17 (− 0.07, 0.40), p = 0.17

I2 = 55%, χ2 = 6.67 (df = 3)

Critically low

No effect

Quality of life

 Fuhr et al. (2014) [37]

Quality of Life (up to 6 months follow-up)

2 (639)

Adult service users with an SMI or depression diagnosis

SMD, Z

0.24 (0.08, 0.40), Z = 3.02 (p = .003)

I2 = 0%, Tau2 = 0, χ2 = 0 (df = 1, p = .98)

Low

Significant improvement in quality of life

 Wang et al. (2022) [44]

Quality of life (last follow-up)

11 (2397)

Adult individuals or family members with SMI

SMD

0.14 (0.06, 0.22); Z = 3.45, p = 0.0006)

I2 = 0%; Tau2 = 0; χ2 = 4.59 (df = 10, p = 0.92)

Critically low

Significant improvement in quality of life

 Lloyd-Evans et al. (2014) [22]

Quality of life (post-intervention)

5 (1039)

Adults with SMI or those using secondary MH services

SMD

0.04 (− 0.16, 0.24)

I2 = 52%; χ2 = 8.38 (p = 0.08)

Low

No effect

Quality of life: follow-up

 Lloyd-Evans et al. (2014) [22]

Quality of life (3–6 months follow-up)

2 (639)

Adults with SMI or those using secondary MH services

SMD

 − 0.24 (− 0.40, − 0.08)

I2 = 0%, χ2 = 0.00 (p = 0.98)

Low

No effect

 White et al. (2020) [45]a

Quality of life (12–24 months follow-up)

5 (688)

Adults using mental health services with any diagnoses

SMD, Z

0.08 (− 0.11, 0.26), Z = 0.8 (p = 0.424)

I2 = 32%, χ2 = 5.9 (p = 0.206)

Critically low

No effect

Satisfaction with care

 Lloyd-Evans et al. (2014) [22]

Satisfaction (post-intervention)

3 (332)

Adults with SMI or those using secondary MH services

SMD

0.02 (− 0.02, 0.23)

I2 = 0%, χ2 = 0.95 (p = 0.62)

Low

No effect

 Pitt et al. (2013) [41, 42]

Satisfaction with treatment (PSW in a professional role, time point not stated)

2 (213)

Adults with severe mental health diagnoses

SMD, Z

 − 0.22 (− 0.69, 0.25), Z = 0.93 (p = 0.35)

I2 = 65.69%, Tau2 = 0.08; χ2 = 2.91 (df = 1; p = 0.09)

Low

No effect

 Pitt et al. (2013) [41, 42]

Satisfaction with service (PSW as an adjunct to care, time point not stated)

2 (125)

Adults with severe mental health diagnoses

SMD, Z

0.76 (− 0.59, 2.10), Z = 1.1 (p = 0.27)

I2 = 63.11%, Tau2 = 0.64; χ2 = 2.71 (df = 1, p = 0.1)

Low

No effect

 Wang et al. (2022) [44]

Satisfaction (last follow-up)

3 (838)

Adult individuals or family members with SMI

SMD

–2.17 (–5.18, 0.84); Z = 1.41, p = 0.16

I2 = 100%; Tau2 = 7.04; χ2 = 464.22 (df = 2, p < .00001)

Critically low

No effect

Satisfaction with care: follow-up

 White et al. (2020) [45]a

Satisfaction with services (12–18 months follow-up)

2 (286)

Adults using mental health services with any diagnoses

SMD, Z

0.19 (− 0.05, 0.42), Z = 1.6 (p = 0.116)

I2 = 0%, χ2 = 0.0 (p = 0.878)

Critically low

No effect

Relational support

 Pitt et al. (2013) [41, 42]

Relationship between treatment provider and service user (participant assessed, time point not stated)

2 (160)

Adults with severe mental health diagnoses

SMD

0.22 (− 0.10, 0.53), p = 0.18)

I2 = 0%

Low

No effect

 Wang et al. (2022) [44]

Social support (last follow-up)

4 (600)

Adult individuals or family members with SMI

SMD

0.09 (–0.08, 0.26); Z = 1.08, p = 0.28

I2 = 0%; Tau2 = 0; χ2 = 2.59 (df = 3, p = 0.46)

Critically low

No effect

 Wang et al. (2022) [44]

Building positive relationships (last follow-up)

2 (293)

Adult individuals or family members with SMI

SMD

–0.62 (–3.02, 1.78); Z = 0.51, p = 0.61

I2 = 99%; Tau2 = 2.97; χ2 = 82.45 (df = 1, p < .00001)

Critically low

No effect

Wang et al. (2022) [44]

Family burden (last follow-up)

2 (540)

Adult individuals or family members with SMI

SMD, Z

–1.75 (–3.63, 0.12), Z = 1.83, p = 0.07

I2 = 99%, Tau2 = 2.69, χ2 = 143.20 (df = 2, p < 0.00001)

Critically low

No effect

 White et al. (2020) [45]a

Social network support (12–24 months follow-up)

4 (512)

Adults using mental health services with any diagnoses

SMD, Z

0.09 (− 0.25, 0.42), Z = 0.5 (p = 0.602)

I2 = 67%, χ2 = 9.2, p = 0.027

Critically low

No effect

Self-efficacy

 Burke et al. (2019) [51]

Self-efficacy (group interventions, end of treatment)

6 (1388)

Adults (including veterans) with any mental health problem

Hedges’ g

0.20 (0.09, 0.31), p < 0.01

I2 = 0%, Tau2 < 0.01, Q = 3.55, p = 0.62

Critically low

Significant improvement in self-efficacy at the end of treatment

 Sun et al. (2022) [43]b

Self-efficacy (post-intervention)

3 (250)

Adults and adolescents with any mental health problem including MH service users without reported diagnoses

SMD

0.31 (0.06, 0.56), p = 0.01

I2 = 0%, χ2 = 0.18 (df = 2, p = 0.91)

Critically low

Significant improvement in self-efficacy

 Wang et al. (2022) [44]

Self-efficacy (last follow-up)

3 (301)

Adult individuals or family members with SMI

SMD

0.34 (0.12, 0.57); Z = 2.95, p = 0.003

I2 = 0%; Tau2 = 0; χ2 = 2 (df = 2, p = 0.37)

Critically low

Significant improvement in self-efficacy

Functioning

 Wang et al. (2022) [44]

Psychosocial functioning (last follow-up)

3 (407)

Adult individuals or family members with SMI

SMD, Z

 − 2.47 (− 2.95, − 1.98), Z = 9.96, p < 0.00001

I2 = 68%, Tau2 = 0.12; χ2 = 6.15 (df = 2, p = 0.05)

Critically low

Significant improvement in psychosocial functioning

 Wang et al. (2022) [44]

Functioning (last follow-up)

7 (1081)

Adult individuals or family members with SMI

SMD

 − 0.33 (− 1.44, 0.77); Z = 0.59, p = 0.55

I2 = 98%; Tau2 = 2.17; χ2 = 346.35 (df = 6, p < .00001)

Critically low

No effect

 Wang et al. (2022) [44]

Family functioning (last follow-up)

4 (646)

Adult individuals or family members with SMI

SMD, Z

0.9 (− 0.50, 2.30), Z = 1.26; p = 0.21

I2 = 98%, Tau2 = 1.94; χ2 = 160.98 (df = 3, p < 0.00001)

Critically low

No effect

 White et al. (2020) [45]a

General and social functioning (6–12 months follow-up)

3 (181)

Adults using mental health services with any diagnoses

SMD, Z

0.01 (− 0.32, 0.35), Z = 0.1 (p = 0.937)

I2 = 21%, χ2 = 2.5 (p = 0.283)

Critically low

No effect

Other psychosocial outcomes

 Sun et al. (2022) [43]b

Self-stigma (post-intervention)

7 (580)

Adults and adolescents with any mental health problem including MH service users without reported diagnoses

SMD

 − 0.32 (− 0.49, − 0.16), p = 0.0001

I2 = 19%, χ2 = 7.39 (df = 6; p = 0.29)

Critically low

Significant decrease in self-stigma

 Sun et al. (2022) [43]b

Stigma-related stress (post-intervention)

3 (238)

Adults and adolescents with any mental health problem including MH service users without reported diagnoses

SMD

 − 0.71 (− 1.11, − 0.30), p = 0.0007

I2 = 58%, Tau2 = 0.07, χ2 = 4.71 (df = 2, p = 0.09)

Critically low

Significant decrease in stigma-related stress

 Fuhr et al. (2014) [37]

Loneliness (post-intervention-12 months follow-up)

2 (641)

Adults service users with an SMI or depression diagnosis

SMD, Z

0.27 (− 0.19, 0.72), Z = 1.14 (p = 0.25)

I2 = 57%, Tau2 = 0.07; χ2 = 2.30 (df = 1, p = 0.13)

Low

No effect

 Wang et al. (2022) [44]

Self-esteem (last follow-up)

3 (759)

Adult individuals or family members with SMI

SMD

 − 0.91 (− 2.78, 0.96); Z = 0.95, p = 0.34

I2 = 99%; Tau2 = 2.71; χ2 = 223.44 (df = 2, p < .00001)

Critically low

No effect

  1. aReview included studies of individual peer support only
  2. bReview included studies of group peer support only; no stars = Review included studies of either individual or group peer support, or both