Research question | N Reviews | Key findings |
---|---|---|
1. What is the effectiveness (e.g. clinical, social, functional) and cost-effectiveness of paid peer support approaches for mental health? | 23 reviews | • Results were mixed. • There was some evidence from meta-analyses that peer support may improve depression symptoms (particularly perinatal depression), self-efficacy, and recovery. |
2. What influences the implementation of peer support approaches for mental health? | 9 reviews | • Factors promoting successful implementation, included adequate training and supervision, a recovery-oriented workplace, strong leadership and a supportive and trusting workplace culture with effective collaboration. • Barriers included lack of time, resources and funding, and lack of recognised PSW certification. |
3. What are the experiences of peer support approaches for mental health (e.g. of acceptability) from the perspective of PSWs, healthcare practitioners, service users, carers? | 11 reviews | Three overarching themes: • ‘What the PSW role can bring’, including recovery and improved wellbeing for service users and PSWs. • ‘Confusion over the PSW role’, including role ambiguity and unclear boundaries. • ‘Organisational challenges and impact’, including low pay, negative non-peer staff attitudes, and lack of support and training. |