Skip to main content
Download PDF

Commentary on the clinical management of metabolic syndrome: why a healthy lifestyle is important

BMC Medicine volume 10, Article number: 139 (2012) Cite this article

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome (MS) is associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases. There is no recognized method to manage MS. Many physicians treat the individual characteristics of MS (high blood pressure, high triglycerides, and so on) instead of the syndrome as a whole, placing particular emphasis on those components that are easily amenable to drug treatment. However, regular physical exercise and a healthy diet have been demonstrated to improve the health of a number of populations, but few studies have assessed their effects in patients with MS. A meta-analysis by Yamaoka and Tango in BMC Medicine found that a lifestyle change program (dietary counseling and encouragement to exercise) resulted in improvements in components of MS and in reducing the proportion of patients with MS. The effects may not be impressive in absolute terms, but the data should be interpreted with the heterogeneity of the included studies in mind. Because of the many adverse side effects of the drugs used to correct individual aspects of MS, this meta-analysis provides strong evidence that lifestyle changes must be the first-line approach to manage MS.

See related article http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/10/138/abstract

Commentary

Metabolic syndrome (MS), defined as a cluster of biological and physiological characteristics, is associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and all-cause mortality [1, 2].

Several definitions of MS have been given, depending on the respective fields of specialty of the experts (cardiology, diabetes, obesity, and so on). According to the American Heart Association [1], MS is diagnosed when any three of the following criteria are associated: waist circumference >102 cm in men and >88 cm in women; triglycerides >150 mg/dl; high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol <40 mg/dl in men and <50 mg/dl in women; systolic blood pressure >130 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure >85 mmHg, or current use of antihypertensive medication; and fasting glucose >100 mg/dl or current drug treatment for elevated blood glucose.

The clinical management of MS is difficult because there is no recognized method to prevent or improve the whole syndrome, the background of which is essentially insulin resistance [3]. Therefore, many physicians, depending on their own medical subspecialty, treat one particular characteristic of MS (high blood pressure, high blood glucose, and so on) instead of the syndrome as a whole. However, one of the characteristics of MS is generally more degraded than the others in most patients (overweight, high triglycerides, and so on), and it is this one that patients usually wish to have corrected.

Thus, most physicians treat each component of MS separately, laying particular emphasis on those components that are easily amenable to drug treatment. In fact, it is easier to prescribe a drug to lower blood pressure, blood glucose or triglycerides rather than initiating a long-term strategy to change people's lifestyle (exercise more, eat better) in the hope that they will ultimately lose weight and tend to have lower blood pressure, blood glucose and triglycerides.

This is a critical issue because it is still not clear whether type 2 diabetes and CVD ultimately result from a deleterious lifestyle or from the specific abnormalities that characterize MS. In other words: is it the lack of physical exercise that is harmful, or a low HDL level?

Recent data regarding the use of drugs to raise HDL levels suggest that a marked increase in HDL does not result in significant health benefits, and that it may be more important to correct the lifestyle; that is, more skeletal muscle activity associated with more physical exercise rather than artificially increasing HDL using a drug [4–6].

In addition, there is still controversy regarding the best diet to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes and to prevent or improve MS [7–12].

As a consequence, many physicians think that the first priority to protect their patients is to help them stop smoking and lower their blood cholesterol (usually with a statin), hoping that this approach will reduce the risk of CVD complications. However, both smoking cessation [13, 14] and use of statins - causing a decrease in physical activity because of their toxicity on skeletal muscle [15, 16] - can lead to weight gain, deterioration of some MS characteristics and increase the risk of new-onset type 2 diabetes [17, 18].

It is only on reconsideration that some physicians may try to improve their patient's diet and encourage them to exercise more. At that time, as smoking cessation and lower cholesterol levels due to use of a statin may have considerably improved their risk factor status, patients might be unwilling to further change their lifestyle. Also, many of them may be reluctant to exercise because of the toxic effects of statins on their muscles. As a consequence, proactive physicians prescribe drugs to lower blood pressure, blood glucose and triglycerides to further improve the risk factor status of their patients, and many patients inevitably develop the many adverse effects of these drugs [19–22], in particular increased insulin resistance. This is definitely a vicious circle, and unfortunately a realistic description of what happens in daily medical practice.

And yet, regular physical exercise and a healthy diet have been unequivocally demonstrated to improve the health of a number of populations [23–27]. However, few studies have assessed their effects in individuals with MS [28–32].

In this context, the systematic review and meta-analysis performed by Yamaoka and Tango, examining the effects of lifestyle changes on MS, is welcome [33]. They have identified eight randomized controlled trials and included them in a meta-analysis. They found that a lifestyle change program (essentially dietary counseling and encouragement to exercise more) resulted in significant improvements in most components of MS and in reducing the proportion of patients with MS in comparison to conventional approaches [33].

The effects may not be impressive in absolute terms, but the data should be interpreted with the heterogeneity of the included studies in mind. In fact, variability is quite wide in terms of study duration and the types of lifestyle changes. For instance, some investigators used either the DASH ('Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension') or the Mediterranean diet, whereas others used low-fat diets.

The studied populations also are a source of heterogeneity. Some studies were conducted in Europe, either Northern Europe (UK and Finland) or Southern Europe (Italy and Spain), and others in the USA and in Iran. In fact, it is likely that the traditional lifestyles in these various parts of the world and the expected responses of the studied populations to any intervention will be different. Finally, there was no attempt in this meta-analysis to adjust for the drugs used in these highly diverse populations. As discussed above, drugs remain the preferred approach of many physicians in most European countries and in the USA to improve or suppress the abnormalities associated with MS. This factor may have been a major confounder in some of the included trials.

Despite these limitations, and also because of the many adverse side effects of the drugs used to correct some aspects of MS, as the authors conclude, this meta-analysis provides strong evidence that long-term lifestyle changes must be the first-line approach to reduce the prevalence of MS and of its complications.

Author information

MdeL is a cardiologist and nutritionist, and full-time researcher at the School of Medicine of the University of Grenoble (France) and at the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) in the Life Science Department.

References

  1. 1.

    Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, Gordon DJ, Krauss RM, Savage PJ, Smith SC, Spertus JA, Costa F, for the American Heart Association and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute scientific statement. Circulation. 2005, 112: 2735-2752. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.169404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wilson PWF, D'Agostino RB, Parise H, Sullivan L, Meigs JB: Metabolic syndrome as a precursor of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2005, 112: 3066-3072. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.539528.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Reaven GM: Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes. 1988, 37: 1595-1607. 10.2337/diabetes.37.12.1595.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Barter P: Raising HDL-C can be achieved by both lifestyle changes and pharmacological means. Introduction. Atheroscler Suppl. 2011, 12: 265-266. 10.1016/S1567-5688(11)00035-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kastelein JJ, van Leuven SI, Burgess L, Evans GW, Kuivenhoven JA, Barter PJ, Revkin JH, Grobbee DE, Riley WA, Shear CL, Duggan WT, Bots ML, RADIANCE 1 Investigators: Effect of torcetrapib on carotid atherosclerosis in familial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2007, 356: 1620-1630. 10.1056/NEJMoa071359.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Barter PJ, Caulfield M, Eriksson M, Grundy SM, Kastelein JJ, Komajda M, Lopez-Sendon J, Mosca L, Tardif JC, Waters DD, Shear CL, Revkin JH, Buhr KA, Fisher MR, Tall AR, Brewer B, ILLUMINATE Investigators: Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events. N Engl J Med. 2007, 357: 2109-2122. 10.1056/NEJMoa0706628.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Grundy SM, Hansen B, Smith SC, Cleeman JI, Kahn RA: Clinical management of metabolic syndrome: report of the American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Diabetes Association conference on scientific issues related to management. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004, 24: e19-24.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    de Lorgeril M, Salen P: New insights into the health effects of dietary saturated and omega-6 and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. BMC Med. 2012, 10: 50-10.1186/1741-7015-10-50.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tortosa A, Bes-Rastrollo M, Sanchez-Villegas A, Basterra-Gortari FJ, Nuñez-Cordoba JM, Martinez-Gonzalez MA: Mediterranean diet inversely associated with the incidence of metabolic syndrome: the SUN prospective cohort. Diabetes Care. 2007, 30: 2957-2959. 10.2337/dc07-1231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Azadbakht L, Mirmiran P, Esmaillzadeh A, Azizi T, Azizi F: Beneficial effects of a dietary approaches to stop hypertension eating plan on features of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2005, 28: 2823-2831. 10.2337/diacare.28.12.2823.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    McKeown NM, Meigs JB, Liu S, Saltzmann E, Wilson PW, Jacques PF: Carbohydrate nutrition, insulin resistance, and the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the Framingham Offspring Cohort. Diabetes Care. 2004, 27: 538-546. 10.2337/diacare.27.2.538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fogli-Cawley JJ, Dwyer JT, Saltzman E, McCullough ML, Troy LM, Meigs JB, Jacques PF: The 2005 dietary guidelines for Americans and risk of the metabolic syndrome. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007, 86: 1193-1201.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Aubin HJ, Farley A, Lycett D, Lahmek P, Aveyard P: Weight gain in smokers after quitting cigarettes: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012, 345: e4439-10.1136/bmj.e4439.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Luo J, Rossouw J, Tong E, Giovino GA, Lee C, Chen C, Ockene JK, Qi L, Margolis KL: Smoking cessation, weight gain, and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus among postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med. 2012, 172: 438-440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hoffman KB, Kraus C, Dimbil M, Golomb BA: A survey of the FDA's AERS database regarding muscle and tendon adverse events linked to the statin drug class. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e42866-10.1371/journal.pone.0042866.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Cham S, Evans MA, Denenberg JO, Golomb BA: Statin-associated muscle-related adverse effects: a case series of 354 patients. Pharmacotherapy. 2010, 30: 541-553.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Koh KK, Quon MJ, Han SH, Lee Y, Kim SJ, Shin EK: Atorvastatin causes insulin resistance and increases ambient glycemia in hypercholesterolemic patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010, 55: 1209-1216. 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.053.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Culver AL, Ockene IS, Balasubramanian R, Olendzki BC, Sepavich DM, Wactawski-Wende J, Manson JE, Qiao Y, Liu S, Merriam PA, Rahilly-Tierny C, Thomas F, Berger JS, Ockene JK, Curb JD, Ma Y: Statin use and risk of diabetes mellitus in postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Initiative. Arch Intern Med. 2012, 172: 144-152. 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Opie LH, Yellon DM, Gersh BJ: Controversies in the cardiovascular management of type 2 diabetes. Heart. 2011, 97: 6-14. 10.1136/hrt.2010.214031.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kuperstein R, Sasson Z: Effects of antihypertensive therapy on glucose and insulin metabolism and on left ventricular mass: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study of 21 obese hypertensives. Circulation. 2000, 102: 1802-1806. 10.1161/01.CIR.102.15.1802.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Weidmann P, Ferrier C, Saxenhofer H, Uehlinger DE, Trost BN: Serum lipoproteins during treatment with antihypertensive drugs. Drugs. 1988, 35: 118-134. 10.2165/00003495-198800356-00017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lardinois CK, Neuman SL: The effects of antihypertensive agents on serum lipids and lipoproteins. Arch Intern Med. 1988, 148: 1280-1288. 10.1001/archinte.1988.00380060044012.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wartburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS: Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ. 2006, 174: 801-809. 10.1503/cmaj.051351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Barengo NC, Hu G, Lakka TA, Pekkarinen H, Nissinen A, Tuomilehto J: Low physical activity as a predictor for total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men and women in Finland. Eur Heart J. 2004, 25: 2204-2211. 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.10.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wen CP, Wai JP, Tsai MK: Minimum amount of physical activity for reduced mortality and extended life expectancy: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2011, 378: 1244-1253. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60749-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    de Lorgeril M, Renaud S, Mamelle N, Salen P, Martin JL, Monjaud I, Guidollet J, Touboul P, Delaye J: Mediterranean alpha-linolenic acid-rich diet in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Lancet. 1994, 343: 1454-1459. 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92580-1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    de Lorgeril M, Salen P, Martin JL, Monjaud I, Delaye J, Mamelle N: Mediterranean diet, traditional risk factors, and the rate of cardiovascular complications after myocardial infarction: final report of the Lyon Diet Heart Study. Circulation. 1999, 99: 779-785. 10.1161/01.CIR.99.6.779.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Smutok MA, Reece C, Kokkinos PF: Aerobic versus strength training for risk factor intervention in middle-aged men at high risk for coronary heart disease. Metabolism. 1993, 42: 177-184. 10.1016/0026-0495(93)90032-J.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Pratley RE, Hagberg JM, Dengel DR, Rogus EM, Muller DC, Goldberg AP: Aerobic exercise training-induced reductions in abdominal fat and glucose-stimulated insulin responses in middle-age and older men. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000, 48: 1055-1061.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Blumenthal JA, Sherwood A, Gullette EC: Exercise and weight loss reduce blood pressure in men and women with mild hypertension. Arch Intern Med. 2000, 160: 1947-1958. 10.1001/archinte.160.13.1947.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Dengel DR, Hagberg JM, Pratley RE, Rogus EM, Goldberg AP: Improvements in blood pressure, glucose metabolism, and lipoprotein lipids after aerobic exercise plus weight loss in obese, hypertensive middle-aged men. Metabolism. 1998, 47: 1075-1082. 10.1016/S0026-0495(98)90281-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Eriksson JG: Prevention of type 2 diabetes by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med. 2001, 344: 1343-1350. 10.1056/NEJM200105033441801.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Yamaoka K, Tango T: Effects of lifestyle modification on metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med.

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/10/139/prepub

Download references

Acknowledgements

MdeL discloses receiving research grants (through the Grenoble University School of Medicine) from the European Community and Barilla Soc.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire Cœur et Nutrition, TIMC-IMAG CNRS 5525, Université Joseph Fourier, Faculté de Médecine, 38054, La Tronche, Grenoble, France

    Michel de Lorgeril

Authors
  1. Michel de Lorgeril
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel de Lorgeril.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Lorgeril, M. Commentary on the clinical management of metabolic syndrome: why a healthy lifestyle is important. BMC Med 10, 139 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-139

Download citation

Keywords

  • metabolic syndrome
  • meta-analysis
  • lifestyle
  • triglycerides
  • obesity
  • overweight
  • insulin resistance
  • diabetes
  • hypertension
  • high-density lipoprotein

BMC Medicine

ISSN: 1741-7015

Contact us