Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Antiviral activity of Bifidobacterium adolescentisSPM1005-A on human papillomavirus type 16

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
BMC Medicine201210:72

https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-72

©  Cha et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

  • Received: 20 April 2012
  • Accepted: 12 July 2012
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) support a functional and balanced immune system, and contribute to immune modulatory effects in combatting microbial pathogens, including viruses. Most cervical cancers are associated with anogenital region infection with high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV). In this study, we analyzed the antiviral activity of Bifidobacterium adolescentis SPM1005-A in the SiHa cervical cancer cell line expressing HPV type 16.

Methods

We assessed the cellular toxicity of B. adolescentis SPM1005-A in SiHa cells by the Trypan blue dye exclusion assay. Cells (3.6 × 105) in culture plates with or without B. adolescentis SPM1005-A in the same type of medium, were incubated with HPV type 16 at a concentration of 5.1 × 107 cfu/ml. For antiviral analysis, we performed quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) for E6 and E7 oncogene expressions and observed protein levels by immunoblotting.

Results

The qRT-PCR results showed that E6 and E7 mRNA levels decreased simultaneously. Western blot analysis revealed that the E6 protein expression slightly decreased after 24 and 48 h, but the level of E7 protein expression appear unaffected compared with that in the control. Decreased HPV16 E6 and E7 mRNA transcript and protein levels were not associated with cell morphology or significant cytotoxic effects.

Conclusions

This study showed that B. adolescentis SPM1005-A had antiviral activity through suppression E6 and E7 oncogene expression. The results suggest that B. adolescentis SPM1005-A could be potential applications of HPV-associated cervical cancer prevention.

Keywords

  • antiviral activity
  • Bifidobacterium adolescentis SPM1005-A
  • human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16
  • quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Background

Cervical cancer is the second most common malignant disease of the female reproductive organs, with an incidence per year of almost half a million and a mortality rate of approximately 25% [1]. Most cervical cancers are associated with the anogenital region or mucosa cell infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) [2]. Of the more than 200 different HPV types identified, 30 HPV types infect the anogenital skin and oral mucosa and can be further classified as low risk (LR) or high risk (HR) based on the clinical prognosis of their associated lesions [3]. Approximately 99.7% of cervical cancers contain viral DNA of HR types, with type 16 being the most prevalent, followed by types 18, 31, 33 and 45 [4]. The malignant phenotype of HR types depends on the expression of two viral genes E6 and E7, which bind to p53 and retinoblastoma protein (pRb) and neutralize their function, respectively [5]. The most important function of E6 protein is binding of the tumor suppressor p53, which leads to it degradation through an ubiquitin proteolytic pathway. Degradation of p53 bypasses the normal growth arrest signals at the G1/S and G2/M checkpoints and is the major cause of chromosomal instability, with mutational consequences for HPV-positive cells [6]. The E7 protein interacts with pRb and releases transcription factor E2F, which induces expression of genes involved in cellular differentiation and proliferation [7, 8]. Therefore, the studies for inhibitors of the oncogenic proteins E6 and E7 of HPV type 16 are constantly in progress.

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are widely used and generally recognized as safe organisms for animal and human applications. They produce antimicrobial substances such as organic acids, hydrogen peroxide, diacetyl and bacteriocins, which have beneficial effects on the host organisms [9]. Probiotic LAB support functional and balanced immune systems and contribute to immune modulatory effects in combatting microbial pathogens, including viruses [10]. Several studies have reported that LAB such as Lactobacilli boost the antiviral effect against human rotaviruses that cause diarrhea, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and influenza virus [11–13].

Among commensal bacteria, Bifidobacteria is one of the most numerous probiotics in the mammalian gut that belong to LAB [14]. Xiao et al. have reported cholesterol reduction by a supplement containing Bifidobacterium longum, and Le Leu et al. reported the potential of Bifidobacterium animalis subspecies Lactis to prevent colorectal cancer. Also, antitumor activity has been studied in peptidoglycans isolated from a Bifidobacterium infantis strain [15–17]. Despite the various literatures indicating a protective effect of Bifidobacteria in epidemiological studies, the antiviral effects have not yet been studied in detail. We therefore assessed the antiviral activity of B. adolescentis SPM1005-A on E6 and E7 mRNA transcript and protein levels in the SiHa cervical cancer cell line expressing HPV type 16 in vitro.

Methods

Preparation of B. adolescentisSPM1005-A

For the isolation of Bifidobacteria, fecal samples were collected from healthy Koreans (aged 20 to 30 years old) by BD BBLanaerobic sample collection and transport system (Becton Dickinson and Co, USA) to maintain anaerobic conditions. Fecal samples were serially diluted tenfold from 10-1 to 10-8, and 100 μl were spread into selective blood liver agar (Nissui Pharm, Japan) containing 5% sheep blood. After 48 h of incubation in anaerobic conditions (90% N2, 5% H2, 5% CO2) (Bactron Anaerobic Chamber, USA) at 37°C, brown or reddish-brown colonies 2 mm to 3 mm in diameter were selected for further identification [18]. A fructose-6-phosphate phosphoketolase (F6PPK) test was performed to ensure that the colonies selected were Bifidobacteria [19]. To identify the isolated Bifidobacterium spp. at the species level, 16S rRNA sequencing was performed by Bio leaders (Daejeon, Korea). We established an N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG)-induced mutant of B. adolescentis SPM1005, which we named SPM1005-A. B. adolescentis SPM1005-A, was cultured at 37°C for 48 h on general anaerobic medium (GAM, Nissui Pharm, Japan) under anaerobic conditions and then centrifuged at 1,200 rpm for 15 minutes. The supernatant was separated from the bacterial cell pellet and filtered using an 0.2-μm syringe filter (Sartorius Stedim Biotech, Germany). The purified supernatant was used for further experiments. Written informed consents were obtained from all volunteer who provided samples and the protocol was approved by the Institution Review Board of Office of Research Development, Sahmyook University.

Cell culture and treatment

SiHa cervical cancer cells expressing HPV type 16 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection http://www.atcc.org. The cell lines were grown in Minimum essential medium alpha (Gibco) containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Sigma, USA), 10,000 U/ml penicillin and 10,000 μg/ml streptomycin in a humidified incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2. SiHa cells (1.0 × 105 cells per flask) were incubated for 0, 24, or 48 h in the presence or absence of B. adolescentis SPM1005-A at a concentration of 5.1 × 107 cfu/ml. After incubation, the culture medium was removed and the monolayers were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) without phenol red and supplements; the cells were then immediately used for total protein and RNA extraction.

Cell viability assay

Cell viability was determined by a Trypan blue dye exclusion assay. Cells (3.6 × 105) in culture plates were incubated overnight, and then the medium was changed to new medium either with or without B. adolescentis SPM1005-A at a concentration of 5.1 × 107 cfu/ml, and incubated for 0, 24, 48, and 72 h. After incubation, each cell suspension was mixed with an equal volume of 0.3% Trypan blue solution (Samchun Chemical, Korea). Finally, cells were observed under a microscope, and living cells were counted on hemocytometer. Morphological changes were observed using an inverted microscope (Olympus, Japan) at × 400 magnification. Each assay was performed three times in triplicate and results presented as % of control.

Reverse transcription and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from the cell line using RNeasy mini Kit (Qiagen, USA) according to the manufacturer's recommendation. RNA concentration was quantified by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm. In order to analyze the same amount of cDNA in every sample, we performed reverse transcription as a separate step from PCR. The mRNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using oligo-dT primer and Omniscript reverse transcription kit (Qiagen). The cDNA was stored at -20°C or directly used in qRT-PCR. As growth of HPV-transformed cervical cancer cells is dependent on sustained viral oncogene E6 and E7 expression, we investigated the inhibitory effects of B. adolescentis SPM1005-A on the cervical carcinoma cell line, SiHa, with quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), which is an excellent method for quantitation of viral DNA [20, 21].

qRT-PCR was conducted in a Light Cycler (Roche) system and the data were analyzed with Light Cycler software version 4.5. The quantity of HPV16-E6 and HPV16-E7 transcripts in each sample was standardized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) transcript levels. For absolute quantification, cDNA constructed with specific binding sites for HPV16 E6 and E7 primers were used to derive the standard curves. Reactions contained 2 μl each of the cDNA solution, MgCl2, primers and Fast Start DNA Master SYBR Green I (Qiagen). The primer sequences used for qRT-PCR of HPV16-E6 were 5'-GAC CCA GAA AGT TAC CAC AG-3' (nucleotide 44 to nucleotide 64) and 5'-CAT AAA TCC CGA AAA GCA AAG-3' (nucleotide 153 to nucleotide 173), and of E7 were 5'-GGA GGA GGA TGA AAT AGA TGG-3' (nucleotide 99 to nucleotide 199) and 5'-TGA GAA CAG ATG GGG CAC AC-3' (nucleotide 268 to nucleotide 287). GAPDH was used as internal control with primer sequences of 5'-CTG CAC CAC CAA CTG CTT AG-3' (forward) and 5'-TTC TGG GTG GCA GTG ATG-3' (reverse) [22]. The amplification conditions were initial incubation at 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 10 s and 72°C for 10 s. Results were calculated using the ΔΔCT method with cDNA from all samples as a reference as described previously [23]. Positive and negative controls were included in each experiment to ensure reproducible results.

Protein electrophoresis and immunoblotting

After 24 or 48 h of treatment, each sample was washed with PBS and treated with lysis buffer (Thermo, USA). The samples, containing 30 μg of protein, were suspended in a 2 × sample buffer (Sigma, USA), boiled for 4 minutes and resolved on 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gels. The proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Whatman, USA), and equal loading was verified with Ponceau S staining (Sigma). Immunodetection was performed with HPV16-E6 antibody and HPV16-E7 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA), followed by incubation with donkey anti-goat horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated antibody and detection using enhanced chemiluminescence western blotting detection reagents (Abfrontier). β-Actin was used as a normalization standard. Each blot is representative of three experiments.

Statistical analysis

Results were expressed as mean ± SD. One-tailed Student's t tests were employed whenever individual data points were compared. Mean values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Effect of B. adolescentisSPM1005-A on morphology

Representative images of the morphological changes observed after 24, 48, or 72 h are shown in Figure 1. Compared to control PBS-treated cells, cells exposed to B. adolescentis SPM1005-A for 72 h slowly shrank in appearance, but there was no observed difference in 24-h to 72-h treated cells.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Morphological changes by Bifidobacterium adolescentis SPM1005-A treatment in the cervical cancer cell line SiHa. (A) Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-treated SiHa cells were cultured with B. adolescentis SPM1005-A at a concentration of 5.1 × 107 cfu/ml for 24 h (B), 48 h (C) and 72 h (D). Cells were viewed under a microscope and photographed at × 400.

Cytotoxic effects

The cytotoxicity of B. adolescentis SPM1005-A was evaluated by Trypan blue dye exclusion assay. Based on the results of the assay, the cell survival rate decreased slightly (92, 95, 89%, respectively) with 24-h to 72-h exposure to 5.1 × 107 cfu/ml B. adolescentis SPM1005-A (Figure 2). This indicates that B. adolescentis SPM1005-A does not significantly affect the cytotoxicity of SiHa cells. Consequently, experiments to assess the antiviral activity were carried out at this tested concentration in this study.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Effect of Bifidobacterium adolescentis SPM1005-A on viability of SiHa cells. Cells at a density of 1 × 107 were plated and grown in the presence (squares) of 5.1 × 107 cfu/ml B. adolescentis SPM1005-A or absence (diamonds) for 0, 24, 48, and 72 h. After incubation, cells were split and counted by the Trypan blue dye exclusion assay.

Inhibition of B. adolescentisSPM1005-A on E6 and E7 expression

For this purpose, total RNA was converted to cDNAs for E6, E7 and GAPDH as a control by using oligo-dT primer reverse transcription. The qRT-PCR results showed a reduction of both genes mRNA transcript levels after incubating the cells with B. adolescentis SPM1005-A for 24 and 48 h (Figure 3A). PBS-treated cells were used as a control. A reduction in E6 mRNA expression was observed compared with that in untreated cells after 24 h. In particular, E6 and E7 expression levels were significantly inhibited by B. adolescentis SPM1005-A treatment for 48 h (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).
Figure 3
Figure 3

The expression of E6 and E7 mRNA transcript levels (A) and protein (B) in SiHa cells. SiHa cells were treated with 5.1 × 107 cfu/ml Bifidobacterium adolescentis SPM1005-A for 24 or 48 h. Transcript levels were standardized against the glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA level as normalization control. Each sample was evaluated by separate experiments, and results represent the means and standard deviation (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). The cells were collected and the extracts (30 μg) were resolved on 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and immunoblotted with anti-human papillomavirus (HPV)16 E6 and anti-HPV16 E7 polyclonal antibodies. β-Actin was used as a normalization standard. The arrow indicates the location of the protein in the gel.

Western blotting

Western blot analysis revealed that the expression of both proteins decreased slightly after incubation with B. adolescentis SPM1005-A (Figure 3B). Inhibition of E6 protein levels was observed at both 24 and 48 h in comparison to β-actin. The qRT-PCR results revealed that E7 mRNA levels decreased after treatment in the SiHa cell line, whereas the level of E7 protein expression in cells treated with B. adolescentis SPM1005-A appeared to be unaffected compared with that in the control. In this respect, the protein change did not consistently occur in a time-dependent manner.

Discussion

Cervical cancer is the second most common malignant disease of the female and is caused by persistent infection with HPV. The majority of cases of cervical cancer develop as squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) or adenocarcinoma [24]. The prevalence of HR HPV infection among young women is typically around 20% to 40% depending on geographical region, with the incidence lowering with age as infections are controlled by the host immune system [25, 26].

Probiotics, particularly Bifidobacteria, are used in fermented food and are widely assumed to be safe. Few attempts have been made recently to study the potential benefits of LAB. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Lactobacillus acidophilus CRL431 are known to interfere with virus-induced pathology indirectly, by favoring cellular homeostasis, either stimulating innate or adaptive immunity [27]. In addition, several studies have shown that orally delivered probiotics can develop a mutually advantageous symbiosis with the gastrointestinal tract and activate immune systems by the release of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNFα), interleukin (IL)-12, or IL-6, and by production of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) and IL-10 [28–31]. Some Bifidobacterium species have been reported to prevent infections by pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella and Helicobacter pylori [32–34]. Despite literature indicating the beneficial effects of Bifidobacteria, the antiviral effects have not yet been studied in cervical carcinoma cell lines. The antiviral effects of Bifidobacteria have rarely been studied in cervical cancer cell lines or in vivo, so the molecular mechanisms that underlie these effects need to be investigated in detail.

In the current study, we assessed the inhibitory effects on HPV oncogene mRNA and protein expression. As previously mentioned, the carcinogenesis process of cervical cancer is associated with the overexpression of the viral oncogenic proteins E6 and E7 that inactivate the tumor suppressors, p53 and pRb, block apoptosis, shorten telomeres and reduce immune recognition [35]. There have been several attempts to suppress these two genes typical to HR-HPV16 and HR-HPV18. Li et al. demonstrated that oncogenic gene downregulation mechanisms that increase tumor suppressor factors and induce apoptosis may be employed in cervical cancer cells [36].

Our results showed that B. adolescentis SPM1005-A can downregulate expression of both genes at both the mRNA and protein levels in SiHa cells. In particular, expression of both genes was decreased significantly with B. adolescentis SPM1005-A treatment for 48 h. In addition, decreased HPV16 E6 and E7 gene expressions and protein levels were not associated with cell morphology and significant cytotoxic effects of B. adolescentis SPM1005-A in SiHa cells. However, it has been not determined how B. adolescentis SPM1005-A regulates the expression of E6 and E7 genes or what is the specific target region.

Conclusions

In summary, B. adolescentis SPM1005-A was found to have antiviral activity through suppression of E6 and E7 oncogene expression. The results suggest that B. adolescentis SPM1005-A could be useful for prevention of HPV-associated cervical cancer.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work (grant no. 000449270111) was supported by Business for Cooperative R&D between Industry, Academy, and Research Institute funded Korea Small and Medium Business Administration in 2011. The authors are grateful to the College of Pharmacy of Sahmyook University and for the financial support provided by the Sahmyook University Research Fund.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Pharmacy, Sahmyook University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
(2)
Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
(3)
Department of Sport Medicine, Jung Won University, Chungbuk, Republic of Korea

References

  1. Arbyn M, Castellsagué X, de Sanjosé S, Bruni L, Saraiya M, Bray F, Ferlay J: Worldwide burden of cervical cancer in 2008. Ann Oncol. 2011, 22: 2675-2686. 10.1093/annonc/mdr015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Campisi G, Panzarella V, Giuliani M, Lajolo C, Di Fede O, Falaschini S, Di Liberto C, Scully C, Lo Muzio L: Human papillomavirus: its identity and controversial role in oral oncogenesis, premalignant and malignant lesions. Int J Oncol. 2007, 30: 813-823.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Münger K, Baldwin A, Edwards KM, Hayakawa H, Nguyen CL, Owens M, Grace M, Huh K: Mechanisms of human papillomavirus-induced oncogenesis. J Virol. 2004, 78: 11451-11460. 10.1128/JVI.78.21.11451-11460.2004.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer JA, Shah KV, Snijders PJ, Peto J, Meijer CJ, Muñoz N: Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999, 189: 12-19. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1<12::AID-PATH431>3.0.CO;2-F.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Um SJ, Lee SY, Kim EJ, Myoung J, Namkoong SE, Park JS: Down-regulation of human papillomavirus E6/E7 oncogene by arsenic trioxide in cervical carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2002, 181: 11-22. 10.1016/S0304-3835(02)00039-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Thomas M, Pim D, Banks L: The role of the E6-p53 interaction in the molecular pathogenesis of HPV. Oncogene. 1999, 18: 7690-7700. 10.1038/sj.onc.1202953.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Huh KW, DeMasi J, Ogawa H, Nakatani Y, Howley PM, Münger K: Association of the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein with the 600-kDa retinoblastoma protein-associated factor, p600. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 11492-11497. 10.1073/pnas.0505337102.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Huh K, Zhou X, Hayakawa H, Cho JY, Libermann TA, Jin J, Harper JW, Munger K: Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein associated with the cullin 2 ubiquitin ligase complex, which contributes to degradation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor. J Virol. 2007, 81: 9737-9747. 10.1128/JVI.00881-07.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Seo BJ, Mun MR, J RK, Kim CJ, Lee I, Chang YH, Park YH: Bile tolerant Lactobacillus reuteri isolated from pig feces inhibits enteric bacterial pathogens and porcine rotavirus. Vet Res Commun. 2010, 34: 323-333. 10.1007/s11259-010-9357-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ivec M, Botić T, Koren S, Jakobsen M, Weingartl H, Cencic A: Interactions of macrophages with probiotic bacteria lead to increased antiviral response against vesicular stomatitis virus. Antiviral Res. 2007, 75: 266-274. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2007.03.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhang W, Azevedo MS, Wen K, Gonzalez A, Saif LJ, Li G, Yousef AE, Yuan L: Probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus enhances the immunogenicity of an oral rotavirus vaccine in gnotobiotic pigs. Vaccine. 2008, 26: 3655-3661. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.04.070.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Martín V, Maldonado A, Fernández L, Rodríguez JM, Connor RI: Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by lactic acid bacteria from human breastmilk. Breastfeed Med. 2010, 5: 153-158. 10.1089/bfm.2010.0001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Yasui H, Kiyoshima J, Hori T: Reduction of influenza virus titer and protection against influenza virus infection in infant mice fed Lactobacillus casei Shirota. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004, 11: 675-679.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Yin YN, Yu QF, Fu N, Liu XW, Lu FG: Effects of four Bifidobacteria on obesity in high-fat diet induced rats. World J Gastroenterol. 2010, 16: 3394-3401. 10.3748/wjg.v16.i27.3394.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Xiao JZ, Kondo S, Takahashi N, Miyaji K, Oshida K, Hiramatsu A, Iwatsuki K, Kokubo S, Hosono A: Effects of milk products fermented by Bifidobacterium longum on blood lipids in rats and healthy adult male volunteers. J Dairy Sci. 2003, 86: 2452-2461. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73839-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Le Leu RK, Hu Y, Brown IL, Woodman RJ, Young GP: Synbiotic intervention of Bifidobacterium lactis and resistant starch protects against colorectal cancer development in rats. Carcinogenesis. 2010, 31: 246-251. 10.1093/carcin/bgp197.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sekine K, Ohta J, Onishi M, Tatsuki T, Shimokawa Y, Toida T, Kawashima T, Hashimoto Y: Analysis of antitumor properties of effector cells stimulated with a cell wall preparation (WPG) of Bifidobacterium infantis. Biol Pharm Bull. 1995, 18: 148-153. 10.1248/bpb.18.148.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Scardovi V: Genus Bifidobacterium. Bergey's Manual of Systemic Bacteriology. Edited by: Krieg NR, Holt JG. 1986, Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 1418-1434.Google Scholar
  19. Ahn JB: Isolation and characterization of Bifidobacterium producing exopolysaccharide. Food Eng Prog. 2005, 9: 291-296.Google Scholar
  20. Scheffner M, Romanczuk H, Münger K, Huibregtse JM, Mietz JA, Howley PM: Functions of human papillomavirus proteins. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1994, 186: 83-99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hausen H: Papillomaviruses causing cancer: evasion from host-cell control in early events in carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000, 92: 690-698. 10.1093/jnci/92.9.690.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Luczak MW, Jagodzinski PP: Apicidin down-regulates human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 transcripts and proteins in SiHa cervical cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2008, 272: 53-60. 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.06.030.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kenneth JL, Thomas DS: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔC T method. Methods. 2001, 25: 402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. González MA: Molecular biology of cervical cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2007, 9: 347-354. 10.1007/s12094-007-0066-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Richardson H, Kelsall G, Tellier P, Voyer H, Abrahamowicz M, Ferenczy A, Coutlée F, Franco EL: The natural history of type-specific human papillomavirus infections in female university students. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003, 12: 485-490.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Clifford GM, Rana RK, Franceschi S, Smith JS, Gough G, Pimenta JM: Human papillomavirus genotype distribution in low-grade cervical lesions: comparison by geographic region and with cervical cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005, 14: 1157-1164. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0812.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Vrese M, Rautenberg P, Laue C, Koopmans M, Herremans T, Schrezenmeir J: Probiotic bacteria stimulate virus-specific neutralizing antibodies following a booster polio vaccination. Eur J Nutr. 2005, 44: 406-413. 10.1007/s00394-004-0541-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Cross ML, Ganner A, Teilab D, Fray LM: Patterns of cytokine induction by gram-positive and gram-negative probiotic bacteria. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2004, 42: 173-180. 10.1016/j.femsim.2004.04.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pohjavuori E, Viljanen M, Korpela R, Kuitunen M, Tiittanen M, Vaarala O, Savilahti E: Lactobacillus GG effect in increasing INF-gamma production in infants with cow's milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004, 114: 131-136. 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.03.036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Dugas B, Mercenier A, Lenoir-Wijnkoop I, Arnaud C, Dugas N, Postaire E: Immunity and probiotics. Immunol Today. 1999, 20: 387-390. 10.1016/S0167-5699(99)01448-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jagtar S, Shweta S: Classification, regulatory acts and applications of nutraceuticals for health. Int J Pharm Biol Sci. 2012, 2: 177-187.Google Scholar
  32. Romond MB, Haddou Z, Mie lcareck C, Romond C: Bifidobacteria and human health: regulatory effect of indigenous bifidobacteria on Escherichia coli intestinal colonization. Anaerobe. 1997, 3: 131-136. 10.1006/anae.1997.0089.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang KY, Li SN, Liu CS, Perng DS, Su YC, Wu DC, Jan CM, Lai CH, Wang TN, Wang WM: Effects of ingesting Lactobacillus- and Bifidobacterium containing yogurt in subjects with colonized Helicobacter pylori. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004, 80: 737-741.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Silva AM, Barbosa FH, Duarte R, Vieira LQ, Arantes RM, Nicoli JR: Effect of Bifidobacterium longum ingestion on experimental in salmonellosis in mice. J Appl Microbiol. 2004, 97: 29-37. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02265.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Woodman CB, Collins S, Winter H, Bailey A, Ellis J, Prior P, Yates M, Rollason TP, Young LS: Natural history of cervical human papillomavirus infection in young women: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet. 2001, 357: 1831-1836. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04956-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Li GL, Jiang W, Xia Q, Chen SH, Ge XR, Gui SQ, Xu CJ: HPV E6 down-regulation and apoptosis induction of human cervical cancer cells by a novel lipid-soluble extract (PE) from Pinellia pedatisecta Schott in vitro. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 132: 56-64. 10.1016/j.jep.2010.07.035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

    37. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/10/72/prepub

Copyright

© Cha et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Medicine

ISSN: 1741-7015

Contact us