Skip to main content

Advertisement

  • Review
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Venous hemodynamics in neurological disorders: an analytical review with hydrodynamic analysis

BMC Medicine201311:142

https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-142

©  Beggs; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

  • Received: 2 January 2013
  • Accepted: 20 February 2013
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Venous abnormalities contribute to the pathophysiology of several neurological conditions. This paper reviews the literature regarding venous abnormalities in multiple sclerosis (MS), leukoaraiosis, and normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). The review is supplemented with hydrodynamic analysis to assess the effects on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics and cerebral blood flow (CBF) of venous hypertension in general, and chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) in particular.

CCSVI-like venous anomalies seem unlikely to account for reduced CBF in patients with MS, thus other mechanisms must be at work, which increase the hydraulic resistance of the cerebral vascular bed in MS. Similarly, hydrodynamic changes appear to be responsible for reduced CBF in leukoaraiosis. The hydrodynamic properties of the periventricular veins make these vessels particularly vulnerable to ischemia and plaque formation.

Venous hypertension in the dural sinuses can alter intracranial compliance. Consequently, venous hypertension may change the CSF dynamics, affecting the intracranial windkessel mechanism. MS and NPH appear to share some similar characteristics, with both conditions exhibiting increased CSF pulsatility in the aqueduct of Sylvius.

CCSVI appears to be a real phenomenon associated with MS, which causes venous hypertension in the dural sinuses. However, the role of CCSVI in the pathophysiology of MS remains unclear.

Keywords

  • Venous hypertension
  • CCSVI
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Leukoaraiosis
  • Normal-pressure hydrocephalus
  • Cerebral blood flow
  • Cerebrospinal fluid

Introduction

The cerebral venous system is often viewed simply as a series of collecting vessels channeling blood back to the heart, yet it also plays an important role in the intracranial hemodynamic/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) regulatory system (hereafter simply referred to as the hydrodynamic regulatory system), a role that is often overlooked and that appears to influence both perfusion of the brain parenchyma [1, 2] and the dynamics of the CSF system [3–5]. Although the physiological mechanisms associated with cerebral-venous outflow are poorly understood, abnormalities of the venous system have been implicated in a variety of neurological disorders, including multiple sclerosis (MS) [4, 6–11], leukoaraiosis [3, 12–16], vascular dementia [5, 17], and normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) [2, 3]. This raises intriguing questions about the involvement of the venous system in these pathophysiologies. Furthermore, similarities between the intracranial hydrodynamic phenomena associated with these conditions suggest that common physiological mechanisms may be at work. This paper reviews the literature relating to the role of the venous system in MS, leukoaraiosis, and NPH, with the aim of better understanding the contribution of venous hemodynamics to these neurological disorders.

Evidence of venous involvement

Despite having very different pathologies, MS, leukoaraiosis, and NPH all share some common characteristics. In all three conditions, cerebral blood flow (CBF) is reduced [18–21]. Both MS [6, 10] and leukoaraiosis [13, 14, 22, 23] are characterized by changes in the white matter (WM) in the periventricular region, and enlarged lateral ventricles are associated with both MS [24, 25] and NPH [26, 27]. Furthermore, some clinical characteristics are also shared. Gait disturbances [28–31], reduced cognitive ability [30, 32, 33], and loss of bladder control [30, 34, 35] have been reported for all three conditions. This suggests that the pathophysiology of these disparate conditions might share a common feature. Having said this, all three diseases display marked pathophysiological differences. For example, MS is an autoimmune disease, characterized by brain atrophy [36, 37], and it is thought that this is primarily responsible for ventricular enlargement [24, 25]. Although the ventricles are also enlarged in NPH, brain parenchymal atrophy is not evident [26], and a measure of ventricular normality can sometimes be restored by the surgical insertion of a shunt to drain away excess CSF [27, 38, 39]. Although MS and leukoaraiosis both exhibit periventricular WM changes, leukoaraiosis is thought to be one presentation of cerebral small-vessel disease [40], whereas MS is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) [41]. Consequently, MS therapies focus on preventing axonal demyelination and promoting remyelination [42, 43], whereas vigorous treatment of cardiovascular risk factors has been advocated to prevent the development of leukoaraiosis, and to reduce the attendant risk of stroke and dementia [44].

Multiple sclerosis

Since the earliest years of research into MS, there has been suspicion that the venous system might be involved in its etiology, with Dawson [10], Putnam [6, 11] and others [45–49] all implicating veins in the pathophysiology of the disease. MS plaques are often venocentric, and frequently form around the periventricular veins [6]. Dawson [10] reported that finger-like plaques form at the junction of the subependymal and medullary veins in the periventricular WM. Putnam and Adler [6], commenting on the appearance of these ‘Dawson’s fingers’, observed that the medullary veins were enclosed in a sleeve of plaque, and that, adjacent to the plaques, the veins were grossly distorted and distended. Others [45, 50–52] have also shown that inflammatory lesions tend to form axially around veins in the WM, with Tallantyre et al. [53] finding 80% of MS lesions to be perivenous in nature. Kidd et al. [50] showed that lesions in the grey matter (GM) are also associated with veins, with the majority of cortical lesions arising within the territory of the principal vein, V5, whose course begins in the WM [54], and the remaining cortical lesions forming in the region drained by its branches or those of the superficial veins. Others have confirmed these observations, finding intracortical [55–57], leucocortical [55], and sub-cortical [52] lesions to be perivenous. However, the connection with the venous system has largely been ignored, with the focus of MS research turning instead towards the involvement of the immune system in the disease [58, 59].

Recently, there has been renewed interest in studying vascular changes associated with MS [60–62]. This has been precipitated by the controversial finding that abnormalities in the extracranial venous system appear to be associated with the disease [4, 7, 8, 63]. This condition, known as chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI), is characterized by multiple intraluminal stenotic malformations of the principal venous-drainage pathways, particularly in the internal jugular veins (IJVs) and the azygos vein, and has been shown to be associated with impaired blood flow from the brain to the heart in patients with MS [8], with the hydraulic resistance of the cerebral-venous drainage system being on average 63.5% greater in CCSVI-positive individuals [64]. CCSVI also appears to be associated with changes in the intracranial vasculature, with a strong correlation shown between CCSVI severity and decreased CBF in both the WM and GM of patients with MS [65]. In addition, Zivadinov et al. [9] reported a marked reduction in venous vasculature visibility (VVV) on susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) for cerebral veins of less than 0.3 mm diameter in patients with MS compared with controls, a phenomenon that is strongly statistically associated with CCSVI (P < 0.0001). This finding appears to corroborate the work of Ge et al. [66]. However, unlike Ge et al., who attributed the reduction in VVV to hypometabolic status in the brain parenchyma of patients with MS, Zivadinov et al. performed a pre-contrast and post-contrast SWI venography experiment, which indicated the reduction in VVV to be due to morphological changes in the cerebral veins of patients with MS. Indeed, such was the clear-cut nature of these venous changes that Beggs et al. [67] were able to distinguish between patients with MS and healthy controls with 100% accuracy using cerebral-venous data alone.

These findings reinforce a large body of evidence connecting MS with alterations in the cerebral vascular bed. Using tomography, a number of early investigators [68–71], found reduced CBF in the GM and WM of patients with MS. However, this work received little attention and it was not until the advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that interest was renewed [61]. Using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI, Law et al. [18], identified a 53.4% decrease in CBF throughout the normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) in patients with relapsing–remitting (RR) MS compared with controls. This was accompanied by a twofold increase in vascular mean transit time (MTT), and a 13.6% decrease in WM cerebral blood volume (CBV). Adhya et al. [21] studied tissue perfusion in the NAWM of patients with primary progressive MS, relapsing-remitting (RR) MS, and healthy controls. They also found CBF and CBV to be significantly decreased in all NAWM regions in both forms of MS compared with controls. Similarly, Ge et al. [19] found reduced CBF with significantly prolonged MTT in the NAWM to be a feature of MS. Varga et al. [20] reported blood flow to be particularly low in the periventricular region, with CBF in the NAWM in this region being significantly lower in patients with MS compared with controls. Interestingly, they also found CBF to be decreased in the sub-cortical normal-appearing grey matter in patients with RR MS, suggesting a continuum of decreased tissue perfusion, beginning in the WM and spreading to the GM as the disease progresses [60]. Collectively, these findings indicate that hypoperfusion of the WM is a consistent phenomenon in MS, whatever the disease subtype [61]. Several researchers have also found MS to be associated with reduced CBF in the GM. Rashid et al. [72] found hypoperfusion in several cortical areas of patients with RR and progressive MS. Investigating tissue perfusion in the thalamus, putamen, and caudate nuclei of patients with MS, Inglese et al. [73] found a decrease in CBF in the deep GM, the magnitude of which increased with the severity of the disease. These findings, along with those relating to the WM, suggest that MS is associated with systemic changes in blood flow through the cerebral vascular bed, something highlighted by Mancini et al. [74], who found the mean tissue-vein transit time to be 3.2 seconds in patients with MS, compared with only 2.9 seconds in healthy controls.

Venous hypertension in the dural sinuses is known to inhibit absorption of CSF through the arachnoid villi (AV) [75, 76]. Zamboni et al. [4] reported reduced CSF net flow and increased CSF pulsatility in the aqueduct of Sylvius (AoS) in patients with MS, and found this to be strongly associated with CCSVI severity. Magnano et al. [77] also found MS to be strongly associated with increased aqueductal pulsatility and reduced CSF net flow. Although Magnano et al. did not specifically consider CCSVI, their findings are consistent with those of Zamboni et al., and suggest that venous hypertension may be a feature of MS. Abnormal CSF hydrodynamics have also been implicated in the formation of cortical lesions in MS. Sub-pial lesions, which appear not to be perivenous, cover extensive areas of the cortex, and extend from the surface into the brain [55]. They appear to be mediated by infiltrates, generated by inflammatory cells in the meninges or the CSF, which diffuse inwards from the surface of the brain [55, 78]. Kutzelnigg et al. [79] found sub-pial demyelination to be most pronounced within deep invaginations of the cortex, and suggested that this reflected regional differences in CSF flow, with extensive demyelination occurring in areas of CSF stasis.

Leukoaraiosis

Leukoaraiosis is a radiological finding, characterized by WM hyperintensities in the periventricular region on T2-weighted MRI scans [80], which is associated with diverse clinical symptoms, including cognitive impairment [81], vascular dementia [82, 83], gait disturbance [30], and enhanced risk for stroke [84]. Although leukoaraiosis is primarily a pathology associated with aging [83, 85], it shares several similarities with MS [62, 86, 87]. Both diseases affect the WM and are associated with demyelination [13, 82]. In a similar manner to MS, leukoaraiosis is characterized by WM morphological changes around the periventricular veins [13, 14, 22, 23]. Although not fully understood, leukoaraiosis is thought to be associated with chronic cerebral ischemia [88]. In cases of hypoxic/ischemic injury, histological changes of the WM can range from coagulative necrosis and cavitation to non-specific tissue changes such as sponginess, patchy demyelination, and astrocytic proliferation [88]. Such changes are consistent with the lesions seen in patients with leukoaraiosis [89], suggesting that ischemia is closely associated with the condition [88]. In particular, leukoaraiosis is characterized by non-inflammatory collagenosis of the periventricular veins [13, 22], resulting in thickening of the vessel walls and narrowing, or even occlusion, of the lumen [13]. Moody et al. [13] found a strong association between the probability of severe leukoaraiosis and periventricular venous collagenosis (PVC).

Mirroring the cerebral hemodynamics of MS, several researchers have reported leukoaraiosis to be associated with reduced CBF [23, 83, 90, 91]. However, unlike MS, a strong epidemiological link exists between leukoaraiosis and cerebrovascular disease [92–94]. Arterial hypertension and cardiac disease are also risk factors that are frequently associated with leukoaraiosis [88], and these are thought to induce arteriolosclerotic changes in the arteries and arterioles of the WM, replacing the smooth muscle cells by fibro-hyaline material, causing thickening of the vessel walls and narrowing of the vascular lumen [95]. Indeed, arteriolosclerosis is often present within areas of leukoaraiosis [96, 97]. Furthermore, the arterioles supplying the deep WM, which are some of the longest in the brain, frequently become tortuous with aging [23, 98–100], with the result that there is a trend towards increased tortuosity in individuals with leukoaraiosis [23]. This tortuosity usually begins abruptly as the arteriole passes from the cortex into the WM [23], and greatly increases the vessel length. Given that this will increase the hydraulic resistance of the arterioles [99], it will tend to inhibit the blood flow to the deep WM. It is therefore perhaps not surprising that the periventricular veins, being a ‘distal irrigation field’ [88], are prone to ischemic damage under conditions of moderate deficit in blood flow.

Further evidence linking leukoaraiosis with altered venous hemodynamics comes from a series of studies by Chung and co-workers [15, 16, 101], who investigated jugular venous reflux (JVR) (that is, retrograde flow in the IJVs) in older individuals. They found JVR to be a phenomenon that increased with age, and concluded that it was associated with more severe age-related WM changes (leukoaraiosis) [16]. In particular, they found that the IJV lumen cross-sectional area increased with age [101], which suggests dilation of the veins due to increased venous pressure and reduced flow velocity. Chung et al. [101] suggested that if the venous hypertension exceeds the ability of the dilation to compensate for the additional pressure, then it would compromise the competence of the jugular venous valves, with the result that the direction of venous flow could be reversed. They further hypothesized that this ‘chronic or long-term episodic elevated cerebral-venous pressure might cause cerebral venule hypertension, resulting in… reduce[d] CBF since elevated cerebral venule pressure would lower cerebral perfusion pressure’ [15].

In a series of studies, Bateman and co-workers investigated altered venous hemodynamics in a variety of neurological conditions [2, 3, 5, 17, 102, 103]. In particular, they investigated pulsatile blood flow in leukoaraiosis [3] and vascular dementia [5]. In both conditions, they found venous pulsatility to be greatly increased in the straight sinus compared with healthy controls, implying that in individuals with leukoaraiosis and vascular dementia, the blood flow through the WM is highly pulsatile. Given that blood flow through the cerebral vascular bed is generally non-pulsatile in healthy young adults [3, 104], Bateman’s findings imply marked changes in hemodynamic behavior in individuals with leukoaraiosis and vascular dementia, something that will induce transient shear stresses on the endothelia. Given that vessels experiencing highly oscillatory flows also seem to be at high risk of developing arteriosclerosis [105], it is perhaps not surprising that leukoaraiosis is associated with morphological changes in the WM vasculature [13, 14, 22, 23]. Bateman hypothesized that the increased pulsatility exhibited by the CBF was a direct consequence of a dysfunctional windkessel mechanism [3, 5], implying profound alterations in the dynamics of the CSF system. Indeed, Bateman calculated the CSF pulse volume in severe cases of leukoaraiosis to be 46% greater than that in healthy controls [3]. Furthermore, he found that the CSF dynamics associated with leukoaraiosis delayed the egress of blood from the cortical veins into the superior sagittal sinus (SSS), inducing a complex pulse wave, which propagated backwards towards the capillaries of the cortex [3].

Normal-pressure hydrocephalus

NPH occurs when there is an abnormal accumulation of CSF in the ventricles, causing them to become enlarged [27], but with little or no increase in intracranial pressure (ICP). Most adults with the condition experience an ICP that is not unusually high, being generally less than 15 mmHg [106, 107]. NPH is characterized by gait disturbance, urinary incontinence, and dementia [108]. Although its pathophysiology is poorly understood, NPH has traditionally been thought to be a form of communicating hydrocephalus, characterized by poor absorption of CSF into the SSS due to defective AV [109]. However, evidence supporting this opinion is lacking [109], and several commentators have suggested alternative theories [2, 102, 110–112]. In particular, there is growing evidence that reduced intracranial compliance [2, 102, 113, 114], induced by venous hypertension, might be involved in the pathophysiology of NPH [2, 102, 115, 116], although this opinion is disputed by others [26, 117, 118]. Bateman [102] found the arteriovenous delay (AVD), a general marker of intracranial compliance, to be 53% lower in patients with NPH compared with healthy controls. A similar reduction in AVD in patients with NPH was reported in a subsequent study [2]. Mase et al. [114] independently confirmed this finding, showing a 64% reduction in intracranial compliance in patients with NPH compared with controls. The fact that an AVD exists at all indicates the presence of compressible material within the intracranial space, which is deformed when the systolic arterial pulse enters the cranium. With respect to this, the cerebral veins are a likely candidate [115, 116]. Approximately 70% of intracranial blood volume is located within the venous compartment, much of it in thin-walled veins that readily collapse under small changes in transmural pressure. Given that the intracranial veins, particularly those of the superficial venous system, are much more compliant than the arterial vessels, it has been suggested that the change in intracranial compliance seen in patients with NPH may be associated with venous hypertension [2]. In patients with NPH, cortical-vein compliance is significantly reduced [102]; however, following shunt surgery, compliance greatly increases, suggesting that the compliance changes associated with these veins are functional and not structural [2, 102]. NPH has been shown to be associated with venous hypertension in the SSS [119]. It is therefore plausible that hypertension in the SSS might increase the pressure in the cortical veins, with the result that the functional compliance of these vessels is reduced [2]. Furthermore, venous hypertension in the SSS would tend to reduce the compliance of the AV, and this, together with reduced cortical-vein compliance, might account for the reduction in AVD seen in individuals with NHP.

CBF has been found to be lower in patients with NPH than in normal controls [120–123]. This is generally thought to be associated with the formation of ischemic lesions, particularly in the deep WM [118, 122, 124], implying that regional differences in CBF might exist in individuals with NPH. Momjian et al. [122] found the distribution of regional CBF in the WM to be different in patients with NPH compared with healthy controls, with a more pronounced CBF reduction adjacent to the lateral ventricles, and a logarithmic normalization occurring with distance from the ventricles. These findings built on an earlier study by Owler et al. [121], who reported NPH to be associated with a marked reduction in mean CBF in the deep GM. Momjian et al. [122] attributed these phenomena to a combination of factors, including cerebral small-vessel disease; tissue distortion, and reversal of CSF and interstitial fluid flow, resulting in reduced cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) near the ventricles and resultant ischemia. However, this interpretation was challenged by Bateman [102], who found blood flow in the straight sinus, which serves the periventricular region, to be unchanged in patients with NPH compared with controls. Having said this, Bateman also reported 27% less drainage from the SSS in patients with NHP compared with healthy controls. Although Bateman’s findings concerning the blood flow through the deep venous system are difficult to explain, those relating to the superficial venous system, might help to explain the formation of cortical infarcts in patients with NPH reported by Tullberg [124].

A number of researchers have reported marked alterations in CSF dynamics in NPH, with CSF pulsatility in the AoS found to be markedly greater in patients with NPH compared with controls [112, 125–129]. This mirrors the findings of Magnano et al. [77], who found a similar phenomenon in patients with MS. By contrast, the cervical CSF pulse was either unchanged [112] or actually reduced in individuals with NPH compared with controls [126]. Although the reasons for this apparent paradox are difficult to explain, it suggests that biomechanical changes occur with NPH, which alter both intracranial compliance and pulsatility of the cerebral venous and arterial blood flows. NPH also appears to be associated with significantly reduced CSF resorption into the SSS through the AV [26, 130], which is a finding consistent with venous hypertension in the dural sinuses. Drainage of CSF into the dural venous sinuses requires a pressure gradient between the sub-arachnoid space (SAS) and the SSS of about 5 to 7 mmHg [131, 132]. If the pressure in the SSS is increased, then either the ICP must also increase to facilitate CSF absorption through the AV [117], or alternatively the CSF must be absorbed elsewhere in the intracranial space. Given that ICP does not substantially increase in individuals with NPH, this indicates that CSF is being resorbed elsewhere [124]. Bateman [102] suggested that CSF resorption is likely to occur in the sub-ependymal brain parenchyma. Ventricular reflux of fluid has been shown to be a characteristic of communicating hydrocephalus [133, 134], with the periventricular tissue characterized by disruption of the ependyma, and by edema, neuronal degeneration, and ischemia [124]. Although the hydrodynamics associated with ventricular reflux are poorly understood, it may be that reduced CSF absorption by the AV in individuals with NPH at least partly explains the increase in aqueductal CSF pulsatility that is associated with the condition [133].

Mass transfer and spatial proximity

Although there are clear differences in the pathologies of MS, leukoaraiosis and NPH, there are also striking similarities. All three are characterized by: 1) WM changes in the periventricular region; and 2) reduced CBF. The lesions associated with both MS and leukoaraiosis tend to be perivenous in nature, and the changes in CSF dynamics associated with NPH and MS also reveal similarities. This raises intriguing questions as to why these similarities exist. Are there some underlying physical mechanisms that are common to all these conditions?

The proximity of immune-cell aggregations to the vasculature is a hallmark of MS [135]. Whereas much attention has been paid to the biological mechanisms involved in the formation of MS plaques, the implications associated with their spatial arrangement have largely been ignored. Why do MS plaques form next to veins rather than capillaries, and why do they consistently occur in some places and not others? In nature, when a process is truly random, events tend to be widely distributed, with no underlying pattern. Conversely, if there is an underlying phenomenon, then the events will tend to cluster in both time and space. The fact that MS plaques consistently form around the periventricular [136] and cortical [50] veins indicates that the latter, rather than the former process must be taking place. If this were not so, then lesions would be randomly distributed throughout the brain parenchyma. From this, it can be concluded that in MS some unknown, but consistent, phenomenon is at work, which causes plaques to form around certain cerebral veins. Although historically considered a disease primarily affecting the WM, it is now known that cortical demyelination is common in MS and more extensive than previously appreciated [78, 137]. Although it has been reported that many intra-cortical and sub-cortical lesions are perivenous in nature [50, 52, 55–57], it is not known why this is so. However, the fact that MS plaques form in the vicinity of veins in both the deep and superficial systems suggests that the pathophysiological mechanisms at work are extensive and not confined to a focal region.

Another universal principle found in nature is that of mass transfer. In simple terms, in order for matter to move from one place to another, it must be transported by some mechanism. In biology, the transport of cells and chemicals generally occurs either by: diffusion, by active transport (in the case of ion transport across the cell membrane), or through transport in a bulk fluid such as blood. If diffusion or active transport are the mechanisms at work, then there is a tendency towards higher concentrations of the transported substance near its source and lower concentrations further away. If this simple logic is applied to the formation of perivenous MS lesions, it would suggest that the plaque formation emanates from the blood vessels, rather than the other way round. Indeed, the current thinking appears to support this, suggesting that in MS, plaque formation is precipitated by breaching of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) [51, 138, 139]. If the diffusion principle is applied to the observation by Momjian et al. [122] that in patients with NPH the CBF steadily increases the further away from the lateral ventricles, then it suggests that the unknown factor inhibiting blood flow is emanating from the lateral ventricles, which suggests that ventricular fluid reflux might be involved.

The mass transport associated with bulk fluids also appears to offer insights into the spatial arrangement of ischemic WM changes, such as those found in leukoaraiosis. Considering oxygen transport in the blood through the cerebral vascular bed, the law of mass transport dictates that as oxygen is supplied to the brain parenchyma, so the oxygen levels in the blood will decrease. Consequently, the oxygen tension in the cerebral arteries will be higher than that in the cerebral veins. Under normal circumstances, this should not cause any problems, but when CBF is greatly impaired, as in both leukoaraiosis [23, 83, 90, 91] and MS [18–21], then this might create pathogenic conditions in the distal veins. If the oxygen consumption of the endothelia and brain parenchyma surrounding the arterioles and capillary bed is not downregulated, then the oxygen tension in the veins might become so low that ischemic damage could occur in these vessels. With respect to this, the periventricular WM, being at the distal end of the circuit [88], appears to be particularly vulnerable to ischemic damage when blood flow is reduced. If ischemic damage due to hypoperfusion is involved in the formation of MS lesions, as some have suggested [60, 61], then this might explain why plaques tend to form around the veins, rather than the capillaries and arterioles.

Hypoxia

There is increasing evidence that hypoxia-like metabolic injury may be a pathogenic component in the formation of MS lesions [62, 86]. Wakefield et al. [140] found morphological changes in the venous endothelia, which progressed to occlusive vascular inflammation. They proposed that these changes were the precursor to lesion formation, and suggested that demyelination in MS may have an ischemic basis. Aboul-Enein and Lassmann [141] reported similarities between the tissue injury found in inflammatory brain lesions and that found in hypoxic conditions of the CNS. Ge et al. [142] identified subtle venous wall signal changes in small MS lesions, which they interpreted as early-stage vascular changes. These changes may be the result of early ischemic injury, marking the beginning of trans-endothelial migration of vascular inflammatory cells, before any apparent BBB breakdown. Further evidence that focal inflammatory BBB leakage may not be the initiating event in MS plaque formation comes from Werring et al. [143], who measured random motion of water molecules (apparent diffusion coefficient; ADC) in the NAWM of patients with MS. They found that the formation of lesions was preceded by subtle progressive alterations in tissue integrity. Similarly, Wuerfel et al. [144] found that changes in perfusion parameters (CBF, CBV and MTT) were detectable not only prior to BBB breakdown, but also prior to increases in the ADC. They concluded that in MS, inflammation is accompanied by altered local perfusion, which can be detected prior to permeability of the BBB. Commenting on this, D’haeseleer et al. [60] concluded that ‘focal ischaemia might play a part in the development of a subcategory of focal MS lesions’. Lochhead et al. [145], using a rat model, showed that hypoxia followed by re-oxygenation altered the conformation of the occlusion in the tight junctions between the endothelial cells, resulting in increased BBB permeability. In doing so, they confirmed the findings of earlier studies undertaken by the same team [146, 147]. The earliest detectable event in the development of WM lesions is thought to be an increase in the permeability of the BBB [51], followed by inflammation and demyelination. Others have implicated tight-junction abnormalities in increased BBB permeability and lesion formation in MS [139, 148, 149].

Several researchers have found similarities between leukoaraiosis and MS [60, 61]. Leukoaraiosis is characterized by periventricular hyperintensities [80] and reduced CBF in the WM [150]. Its clinical symptoms include cognitive features that are similar to those associated with MS [151]. Graumann et al. [152], investigating gene expression in the NAWM of patients with secondary progressive MS and healthy controls, showed that the patients with MS exhibited consistent differences in the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1a compared with controls. Similar upregulation of HIF-1a in cerebral WM was found by Fernando et al. [153] to be associated with leukoaraiosis, which they attributed to WM hypoperfusion. Leukoaraiosis is associated with significantly decreased CBF in the deep WM [150], and it is thought that ischemia, resulting from poor perfusion, is a major contributing factor [12, 13, 22]. The condition is characterized by non-inflammatory PVC, resulting in thickening of the vessel walls and narrowing of the deep cerebral veins [13, 22], which will inevitably increase the hydraulic resistance of these pathways. Although lumenal narrowing of the periventricular veins has not been reported in patients with MS, Putnam and Adler [6] reported that the periventricular MS plaques resulted in gross distension of the medullary veins upstream of the lesions, suggesting that venous stenosis is occurring. This would inevitably increase the hydraulic resistance of these vessels and promote hypoperfusion. Given that the perfusion pressure, which promotes blood flow, is relatively low in the periventricular veins, the WM in this region is particularly sensitive to fluctuations in total CBF [154]. Any increase in the hydraulic resistance of the periventricular veins might cause shunting of blood away from these vessels [22, 155], an action that would also tend to promote ischemia.

Venous architecture

So why should some regions of the brain be more vulnerable than others to damage? Perhaps the architecture of the cerebral-venous system provides some clues? While the distal venous regions may be prone to hypoxic stress, the spatial arrangement of the veins may also contribute to their vulnerability. Evidence in support this opinion comes from Schlesinger [155], who forced hot carmine–gelatin solution, under high pressure, into the vein of Galen in human cadaver brains. The extravasations that were produced, chiefly in the region of the angle of the lateral ventricle, ‘closely resembled the distribution and shape of plaques in advanced cases of MS’. From this, Schlesinger concluded that: ‘it seems possible that the plaques may only be found in this area of the ventricular wall because they have a definite topographical relationship to the veins which are crowded together in the region of the lateral ventricular angle.’ Although the physiological implications of Schlesinger’s experiment are debatable, his results are clear and unambiguous from a fluid-mechanics point of view. When the gelatin solution was forced into the deep venous system, it divided and flowed up the two internal cerebral veins, so that both hemispheres of the brain were affected. Furthermore, the fluid flowed relatively easily until it came to the junction between the medullary and sub-ependymal veins, where the resistance was so great that the pressure built up to such an extent that the fluid burst through the vessel wall. The experiment therefore indicates two things: first, that the junction between the medullary and sub-ependymal veins has a much higher resistance to fluid flow than the downstream veins; and second, that the vessel walls at this junction are susceptible to rupture if the pressure gets too high.

The finding that the junction between the medullary and sub-ependymal veins has a high resistance to fluid flow is no surprise. The sub-ependymal veins are collecting vessels, which receive venous blood from a large number of the smaller medullary veins that enter the sub-ependymal veins at approximately 90 degrees. From a fluid-mechanics point of view, this is not a very streamlined configuration, and will result in relatively large pressure drop across this junction. Any stenosis at this junction would therefore greatly increase its resistance, possibly leading to distension of the upstream medullary veins, as Putnam and Adler reported [6]. Consequently, the periventricular veins share characteristics normally associated with developmental venous anomalies (DVAs). DVAs are a venous confluence in which a single collecting vessel drains an abnormally large venous territory, resulting in a relative volume overload. This anatomic configuration, as San Millán Ruíz et al. [156] pointed out, is similar to that encountered in the periventricular region. In addition, DVAs have been shown to have thickened walls [156], similar to those associated with PVC [13, 22], with stenosis of the collecting vein reported in 13.1% of patients [156]. Stenosis of this kind invariably increases the hydraulic resistance of the vein, so that the upstream pressure is greatly increased, as was shown by Dillon [157], who measured a 15 mmHg pressure gradient across a stenosis of the collecting vein of a DVA in one patient.

Unlike the deep venous system, the superficial system has thin-walled cortical bridging veins that traverse the SAS. Blood flow through these compliant vessels is controlled by sphincters, which regulate discharge into the SSS [158, 159]. This means that these vessels possess characteristics similar to those of a Starling resistor [160–163], and these collapse, occluding the blood flow, when the transmural pressure reaches a certain threshold [164]. The cortical bridging veins are very sensitive to small changes in transmural pressure. Indeed, because they are required to ‘open’ and ‘close’ to regulate blood flow from the cortex, the cortical venous pressure is only about 2 to 5 mmHg higher than the ICP [164]. This means that small changes in ICP or venous pressure can have a substantial effect on the behavior of blood flow from the cortex. Indeed, it has been estimated that a change of as little as 1.5 mmHg in the difference between ICP and the pressure in the bridging veins could be responsible for the difference between severe hyperemia (CBF = 1000 ml/min) to serve ischemia (CBF = 300 ml/min) [164]. Given that MS may be associated with venous hypertension in the dural sinuses of greater than 2 mmHg [165], it can be hypothesized that this could have a profound effect on blood flow in the cortex. Although it is difficult to say how this might influence hemodynamic behavior in the cortex, it is notable that Kidd et al. [50] found GM lesions in patients with MS to be exclusively located adjacent to cortical veins. Drawing an analogy with WM lesions, they stated; ‘We have been able to show that there is a clear relationship between the site and characteristics of cortical lesions and the five different types of cortical vein, just as Dawson’s ‘fingers’ arise adjacent to veins in periventricular WM’ [50].

Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and venous hypertension

MS, leukoaraiosis, and NPH all appear, to a greater or lesser extent, to be associated with marked changes in the dynamics of the intracranial CSF system. This suggests that these diseases might be associated with alterations in the intracranial hydrodynamic regulatory system, which controls the volume and pulsatility of the blood in the cerebral vascular bed [3, 166, 167]. The interactions between the CBF and CSF are illustrated in Figure 1, which shows an idealized model of the principal intracranial fluid pathways. From this, it can be seen that there is a bulk flow of CSF from the choroid plexus to the SSS, via the AV, driven by the pressure gradient between the two. There is also a complex windkessel mechanism that ensures Monro-Kellie homeostasis, which compensates for transient increases in CBV by pushing CSF out of the cranium [168]. This sophisticated windkessel mechanism uses the CSF to dampen the arterial pulse and to ensure, in healthy young adults, the smooth flow of blood through the capillary bed [5]. The energy from the arterial pulse is transferred to the CSF, which pulses backwards and forwards across the foramen magnum. The blood flow through the cerebral capillary bed is normally smooth and free from a pulse, but by the time it reaches the venous sinuses, it once again exhibits pulsatile characteristics [3, 169]. This suggests that energy transferred from the arterial pulse to the CSF is in turn transferred back to the venous-discharge flow.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Hydrodynamic model of the brain, showing the interactions between the arterial and venous blood flows and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). SSS, superior sagittal sinus; STS, straight sinus; SAS, sub-arachnoid space; AV, arachnoid villi; CP, choroid plexus; FM, foramen magnum; WM, windkessel mechanism; SR, Starling resistor; VL, lateral ventricle; V3, third ventricle; V4, fourth ventricle; AoS, aqueduct of Sylvius; IJV, internal jugular vein; VV, vertebral veins.

The various pulses associated with the intracranial hydrodynamic system are illustrated in Figure 2, which shows the transient flow rates of the arterial, venous, and CSF flows in and out of the cranium in a healthy individual [169]. From this, it can be seen that the system is driven by the arterial pulse, which, as it enters the cranium, greatly increases the volume of blood in the pial arteries during systole [1]. Peak CSF flow through the foramen magnum occurs shortly after the arterial peak, which is in turn followed in late systole by a peak in the venous blood flow leaving the cranium. This movement reflects the transfer of kinetic energy from the arterial to the venous pulse via the CSF system. By comparison, the aqueductal CSF pulse, which is not well understood, is much smaller than, and out of phase with, the cervical CSF pulse. In theory, according to the Monro-Kellie doctrine, at any point in time, the volume of CSF leaving the cranium should be equal to the volume difference between the arterial blood entering the cranium and the venous blood leaving it [170]. In reality, however, the Monro-Kellie doctrine is only approximately true [170], and compliance within the intracranial space, together with inertial forces associated with the CSF fluid column, ensure that small transient imbalances occur between the fluid volumes entering and leaving the cranium.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Transient intracranial blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow rates over the cardiac cycle in a healthy individual. The figure is based on data published by Ambark et al. [169].

Close inspection of Figure 2 reveals an interesting and poorly understood phenomenon. During diastole, when the excess arterial blood stored by the windkessel mechanism is discharged back into the cerebral vascular bed, the venous blood-flow rate leaving the cranium actually decreases. This implies that during this period, the volume of venous blood in the cranium must be steadily increasing, only to be ejected during systole. Although the physiology associated with this mechanism is not well understood, it seems likely that much of this blood is stored during diastole in the cortical bridging veins that transverse the SAS. Discharge from these veins is controlled by regulatory sphincters [158, 159]. Constriction of these sphincters results in an increase in the transmural pressure of the bridging veins, causing them to engorge and ‘puff out’, before periodically discharging into the SSS. Thus, these sphincters, in effect, create Starling resistors, whose characteristics are wholly governed by the respective venous and CSF pressures. Under normal circumstances, this Starling resistor interacts with the CSF pulse in such a way as to ensure the correct flow of blood into the SSS. However, if the venous pressure in the SSS should increase, due to partial occlusion of the cerebral-drainage pathways, then this would change the functional compliance of both the AV and the cortical bridging veins [2, 102, 115, 116]. Under normal circumstances, the compliant AV dampen the systolic CSF pressure wave as the wave travels along the SAS, thus reducing the pressure that it exerts on the cortical bridging veins. Venous hypertension in the dural sinuses is therefore likely to reduce the time duration between arterial initiation of the CSF pulse and impingement of that pulse on the cortical bridging veins. Furthermore, it is likely to increase the intensity of the CSF pressure wave impinging on the bridging veins, so that the venous blood is expelled more rapidly into the SSS. Consequently, a reduction in the time duration between the arterial and venous peaks would be expected, which is exactly what Bateman found in patients with NPH [2, 102]. However, the fluid mechanics associated with this mechanism are complex and it is difficult to predict how the system would behave under different circumstances. For example, if the hydraulic resistance of the cerebral-venous drainage system is greatly increased, as Beggs et al. [64] reported in patients with MS, then rapid discharging of the contents of the cortical veins might lead to a transient increase in pressure in the SSS. How this would behave in practice is a matter of conjecture. It might result in a complex reverse-pressure wave traveling down the cortical veins, as Bateman observed in an individual with leukoaraiosis [3], or alternatively, it could result in venous reflux traveling up the straight sinus, as has been suggested by Schelling [46].

Although the precise behavior of the intracranial hydrodynamic system under conditions of venous hypertension is unknown, there is evidence that occlusion of the venous-drainage pathways causes blood to accumulate within the cranium. In an experiment involving healthy subjects, Kitano et al. [171] showed that compression of the IJVs could result in an increase in intracranial blood volume of 5 to 20%. Frydrychowski et al. [1] also performed bilateral compression of the IJVs on healthy individuals, and found that it caused a reduction in the width of the SAS, a finding consistent with increased CBV. Furthermore, these authors found that during compression of the IJVs, the pulsatility of the pial arteries traversing the SAS increased by 107%. This suggests that occlusion of the venous-drainage pathways reduces compliance of the intracranial space, impairing the windkessel mechanism, with the result that the blood entering the cerebral microvasculature becomes more pulsatile. Frydrychowski et al. [1] concluded that this mechanism potentially linked jugular-outflow insufficiency with arterial small-vessel cerebral disease. Their work seems to corroborate that of Bateman [5], who found vascular dementia to be associated with greatly increased pulsatility in both the basal venous and straight sinus flows.

Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency

In 2009, Zamboni et al. published a paper [7] linking a vascular syndrome, CCSVI, with MS. CCSVI is characterized by restricted venous outflow from the brain [8, 64] due to occlusions, which can take several forms, including the presence of intra-luminal septa, membranes, and immobile valves, as well as segmentary hypoplasia of the veins [172]. CCSVI has proven to be a highly contentious issue [173, 174], with a number researchers doubting its validity as a physiological phenomenon [173, 175–179]. Notwithstanding this, biomechanically, CCSVI will tend to increase the venous pressure in the dural sinuses, which hypothetically could alter the dynamics of the intracranial CSF system and potentially influence CBF.

The results obtained by researchers for CCSVI have been very mixed. For example, some researchers found CCSVI-like venous anomalies to be strongly associated with MS [7, 63, 180–186], whereas others found no significant difference between the venous characteristics of healthy controls and patients with MS [173, 176, 187–190]. Furthermore, CCSVI-like abnormalities are not exclusive to MS, and have been found in lesser numbers in healthy controls [74, 180, 191] and in those with other neurological diseases [180]. However, a recent meta-analysis of the published evidence showed a positive association between CCSVI and MS, although poor reporting and marked heterogeneity between studies precluded any definitive conclusions [192].

One possible explanation for the discrepancies between studies is the echo color Doppler sonography (ECDS) frequently used to diagnose CCSVI. The floppiness of the vessels involved and the variability of the venous vasculature can lead to erroneous results if ECDS is not undertaken correctly [193–195]. In an attempt to avoid these difficulties, Zamboni et al. [8] developed a non-invasive strain-gauge cervical plethysmography technique for characterizing cerebral-venous drainage in patients with MS. In a blinded study involving healthy controls and patients with MS diagnosed with CCSVI, it was found that the hydraulic resistance of the extracranial venous system was on average 63.5% greater in those diagnosed with CCSVI compared with controls (P < 0.001) [64]. This corroborates the work of Monti et al. [196], who found reduced cerebral-venous outflow in the upright position to be strongly associated (P < 0.0001) with MS.

Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency and cerebrospinal fluid flow

Previous work [8, 64, 196] strongly suggests that people diagnosed with CCSVI exhibit reduced cerebral-venous outflow, which in some unknown way, is linked to MS. So if CCSVI is a real phenomenon, what role might it play in pathophysiology of MS? Is it a symptom, or part of the etiology? Although it is not currently possible to definitively answer these questions, it is possible, by considering the effects that occlusion of the IJVs might have on the cerebral hydrodynamic system, to gain insights into what might be happening.

Figure 1 describes the principal fluid pathways and interactions that occur within the cranium, and is therefore useful as a tool with which to interpret cerebral hydrodynamic behavior. In fluid mechanics, the flow through any pipe or vessel is governed by the following equation, which is analogous to Ohm’s law in electrical engineering:
Q = ΔP R
(1)

where Q is the fluid flow rate (ml/min), R is the hydraulic resistance (mmHg.min/ml), and ΔP represents the pressure drop (pressure gradient; mmHg) between the two ends of the vessel. By applying equation 1 to the intracranial system in Figure 1, it is possible to make predictions as to how the system would behave if the IJVs become occluded.

One common feature of CCSVI is stenosis of one or both of the IJVs [7, 197], which will tend to increase the hydraulic resistance of these pathways [64]. According to equation 1, any increase in the resistance due to partial occlusion of the IJVs will result in the two phenomena illustrated in Figure 3. Firstly, this increase in resistance will tend to reduce the flow rate of blood through the IJVs, and secondly, it will increase the pressure gradient through the vessel. Consequently, although hypoperfusion will occur, hypertension will also occur above the obstruction, as is evident by the distension of the IJV frequently seen in patients with CCSVI [165, 197]. This increase in venous pressure will be transmitted up the vessels into the SSS, which has been shown in patients who exhibit thrombosis of the transverse sinuses [198, 199]. Consequently, the increase in blood pressure in the SSS is likely to be the same order of magnitude as that in the IJV; that is, about 2.21 mmHg, according to measurements made by Zamboni et al. [165].
Figure 3
Figure 3

Effect of stenosis on a vein. Q1, blood-flow rate through normal vein; Q2, blood-flow rate through stenotic vein; R1, hydraulic resistance of normal vein; R2, hydraulic resistance of stenotic vein; ΔP1, pressure drop through normal vein; and ΔP2, pressure drop through stenotic vein.

From Figure 1 it can be seen that the SSS acts as a collecting vessel for CSF from the SAS. The CSF bulk flow from the choroid plexus to the SSS via the AV, which in healthy individuals is around 3.3 to 5.5 mm3/beat (assuming 70 beats/min) [76], is very susceptible to changes in pressure [75]. In normal healthy individuals, the hydraulic resistance of the SAS is very low in comparison with the AV, which means that the outflow of CSF from the SAS to the SSS is almost entirely determined by the AV [76]. These open up when the pressure difference between the SAS and SSS is approximately 5 mmHg [75], allowing free absorption of CSF into the venous blood, a process that has been shown to be linear, with an average rate of 0.1031 ml/min/mmHg (0.0076 ml/min/mm H20) [75]. Consequently, an increase of 2.21 mmHg in the SSS pressure would equate to a reduction in CSF bulk flow of about 3.26 mm3/beat (assuming 70 beats/min), which is close to the mean value of 3.4 mm3/beat reported by Magnano et al. [77] for reduction in CSF bulk flow in patients with MS compared with healthy controls, but somewhat lower than the mean difference of 11.86 mm3/beat reported by Zamboni et al. [4]. Collectively, these findings support the opinion that venous hypertension in the dural sinuses is a feature of CCSVI.

Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency and cerebral blood flow

It is possible to gain an insight into the nature of the hemodynamic changes associated with MS, by undertaking simple hydrodynamic analysis of composite data published by Varga et al. [20]. These data are presented in Table 1, and represent measured blood flow in the periventricular WM.
Table 1

Published blood-flow data in the periventricular white matter for healthy controls and patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RR MS) [20]

Source

Parameter

Healthy controls, mean ± SD

Patients with RR MS, mean ± SD

Varga et al., 2009 [20]

CBF, ml/100 g/min

39.73 ± 5.0

33.53 ± 6.10

CBV, ml/100 g

2.62 ± 0.60

2.40 ± 0.40

 

MTT, s

3.94 ± 0.70

4.33 ± 0.50

Abbreviations: CBF, Cerebral blood flow; CBV, Cerebral blood volume; MTT, Mean transit time.

The data in Table 1 complies with the general relationship:
CBF = CBV MTT
(2)
From the data it can be seen that in patients with MS, there is a general reduction in the volume of the vascular bed, which, if approximated to a series of parallel round tubes, equates to a mean reduction in cross-sectional area of the vessels of about 8.4% in patients with MS. According to Poiseuille’s Law:
R ∝ 1 r 4
(3)

where R is the hydraulic resistance of the vessel (mmHg.min/ml) and r is the radius of the vessel (mm), it can be calculated that the 8.4% reduction in average cross-sectional area equates to an approximately 19.3% increase in hydraulic resistance. Given that the blood-flow rate is directly proportional to the hydraulic resistance, this means that the reduction in CBV seen in patients with MS, is more than enough to account for the 15.6% reduction in CBF reported by Varga et al.. According to equation 1, hypertension in the dural sinuses would tend to reduce the pressure gradient pushing the blood through the cerebral veins, which in turn would tend to inhibit blood flow. However, when we consider that the CPP is normally in the region of 70 to 90 mmHg, it is unlikely that venous hypertension of less than 5 mmHg, such as that associated with CCSVI, could account for the large reduction in WM CBF reported in patients with MS [18–21]. Hence, this suggests that the reduction in CBF in patients with MS is probably due to morphological changes in the cerebral vascular bed, rather than a straightforward reduction in perfusion pressure arising from raised pressure in the venous sinuses. However, this does not preclude the possibility that the reduction in CBF may also be due to changes in behavior of the Starling resistor associated with the cortical bridging veins.

Although the above analysis is somewhat simplistic, it does illustrate that cerebral vascular volumetric changes alone appear capable of accounting for the reduction in CBF in the periventricular NAWM in patients with MS. In addition, this finding mirrors those of researchers investigating: 1) reduced CBF [23, 83, 90, 91]; and 2) WM morphological changes around the periventricular veins [13, 14, 22, 23], in patients with leukoaraiosis. Although the above analysis assumes an overall reduction in CBV in patients with MS, this of course does not necessarily imply that all the vessels in the WM have uniformly narrowed, and the results reported by Putnam and Adler [6] regarding periventricular lesions in individuals with MS would suggest otherwise. However, in order to achieve an 8.4% overall reduction in CBV, systemic changes must be occurring in the WM vascular bed, rather than simply occlusions appearing at specific focal points. The finding by Varga et al. [20] of a 10% increase in MTT in patients with MS closely mirrors that of Mancini et al. [74], who reported an 8% increase in MTT. These results strongly suggest that the hydraulic resistance of the whole intracranial vascular circuit is significantly increased in patients with MS. Indeed, it may be the case that some vessels have disappeared completely, as reported by Zivadinov et al. [9], which would inevitably increase the hydraulic resistance of the cerebral vascular circuit.

Further evidence suggesting that occlusion of the cerebral-venous drainage pathways might not be responsible for reduced CBF in patients with MS comes from Moyer et al. [200], who compressed the jugular veins of patients with heart failure; Chai et al. [201], who performed jugular vein ligation in a swine model; and Bateman [202], who investigated idiopathic intracranial hypertension associated with venous outflow stenosis. All these researchers found occlusion of the venous pathways to be associated with CBF rates that were higher than normal. This counterintuitive finding could only be physically possible if the hydraulic resistance of the cerebral blood vessels were greatly reduced, suggesting that obstruction of the venous-drainage pathways results in vasodilatation and increased CBV. However, studies have found CBV to be reduced by 8.4 to 13.6% in patients with MS compared with healthy controls [18–20], suggesting that hyperemia may not in fact be a feature of this disease. Interestingly, Chai et al. [201] reported that cerebral oxygen consumption was significantly increased when venous ligation was applied, which suggests that venous hypertension might alter the metabolism of the brain. Although the effects of venous hypertension on cerebral metabolism are largely unexplored, it is known that the brain regulates blood flow according to its metabolic needs. Consequently, it is difficult to know the extent to which reduced CBF is initiated by venous hypertension or endothelial morphological changes, as opposed to downregulation of the metabolic activity of the brain.

Conclusions

Although much research work has been undertaken into the contribution of venous abnormalities to various neurological conditions, there has generally been a lack of any hydrodynamic analysis to interpret the data collected. Without such analysis, it is possible to misinterpret results and come to potentially erroneous conclusions [174]. In the analytical review presented here, we have sought to redress this issue, and have been able to show that CCSVI-like anomalies in the extracranial venous system are unlikely to account for the reduction in CBF reported in patients with MS. Rather, our analysis suggests that other pathophysiological mechanisms must be a work, which are increasing the hydraulic resistance of the cerebral vascular bed in patients with MS. Similarly, changes in the cerebral microvasculature seem to be responsible for reduced CBF in leukoaraiosis. CBF in the WM is markedly reduced in both MS and leukoaraiosis, and in both conditions, lesions exhibit signs of ischemia, although to a lesser extent in the case of MS. Under conditions of hypoperfusion, the laws governing mass transfer indicate that the cerebral veins are more likely to be affected by hypoxic stress compared with the arterioles and capillaries, and this might, in part, explain why the plaques in MS tend to be perivenular in nature. With respect to this, the hydrodynamic properties of the periventricular veins appear to make these vessels particularly vulnerable to plaque formation.

Venous hypertension in the dural sinuses seems to be associated with marked changes in intracranial compliance. There is sound theoretical reason to believe that this will alter the dynamics of the intracranial CSF system, which in turn may affect the finely tuned intracranial windkessel mechanism. With respect to this, MS and NPH appear to share some similar characteristics. In particular, both conditions seem to be characterized by increased CSF pulsatility in the AoS.

Despite conflicting studies, there is increasing evidence that CCSVI is a real physiological phenomenon, and that it is in some way associated with MS. The evidence from CSF-related studies in patients with MS, and the hydrodynamic analysis presented here, suggests that CCSVI causes venous hypertension in the dural sinuses. However, the role that CCSVI might play in the pathophysiology of MS remains unclear, and more work is urgently needed to understand the clinical relevance of this condition.

Abbreviations

ADC: 

Apparent diffusion coefficient

AoS: 

Aqueduct of Sylvius

AV: 

Arachnoid villi

AVD: 

Arteriovenous delay

BBB: 

Blood–brain barrier

CBF: 

Cerebral blood flow

CBV: 

Cerebral blood volume

CCSVI: 

Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency

CNS: 

Central nervous system

CPP: 

Cerebral perfusion pressure

CSF: 

Cerebrospinal fluid

DVA: 

Developmental venous anomaly

ECDS: 

Echo color doppler sonography

GM: 

Grey matter

HIF: 

Hypoxia-inducible factor

ICP: 

Intracranial pressure

IJV: 

Internal jugular veins

JVR: 

Jugular venous reflux

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

MS: 

Multiple sclerosis

MTT: 

Mean transit time

NAWM: 

Normal-appearing white matter

NPH: 

Normal-pressure hydrocephalus

PVC: 

Periventricular venous collagenosis

RR: 

Relapsing–remitting

SAS: 

Sub-arachnoid space

SSS: 

Superior sagittal sinus

SWI: 

Susceptibility-weighted imaging

VVV: 

Venous vasculature visibility

WM: 

White matter.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Robert Zivadinov for his helpful insights regarding the formation of grey matter lesions in patients with MS. The study was self-funded.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Medical Biophysics Laboratory, School of Engineering, Design and Technology, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP, UK

References

  1. Frydrychowski AF, Winklewski PJ, Guminski W: Influence of acute jugular vein compression on the cerebral blood flow velocity, pial artery pulsation and width of subarachnoid space in humans. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e48245-10.1371/journal.pone.0048245.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateman GA: The pathophysiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: cerebral ischemia or altered venous hemodynamics?. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008, 29: 198-203. 10.3174/ajnr.A0739.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateman GA: Pulse-wave encephalopathy: a comparative study of the hydrodynamics of leukoaraiosis and normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neuroradiology. 2002, 44: 740-748. 10.1007/s00234-002-0812-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Zamboni P, Menegatti E, Weinstock-Guttman B, Schirda C, Cox JL, Malagoni AM, Hojanacki D, Kennedy C, Carl E, Dwyer MG, Bergsland N, Galeotti R, Hussein S, Bartolomei I, Salvi F, Zivadinov R: The severity of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis is related to altered cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. Funct Neurol. 2009, 24: 133-138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bateman GA, Levi CR, Schofield P, Wang Y, Lovett EC: The venous manifestations of pulse wave encephalopathy: windkessel dysfunction in normal aging and senile dementia. Neuroradiology. 2008, 50: 491-497. 10.1007/s00234-008-0374-x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Putnam TJ, Adler A: Vascular architecture of the lesions of multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol Psychiat. 1937, 38: 1-5. 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1937.02260190011001.Google Scholar
  7. Zamboni P, Galeotti R, Menegatti E, Malagoni AM, Tacconi G, Dall'Ara S, Bartolomei I, Salvi F: Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009, 80: 392-399.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Zamboni P, Menegatti E, Conforti P, Shepherd S, Tessari M, Beggs C: Assessment of cerebral venous return by a novel plethysmography method. J Vasc Surg. 2012, 56: 677-685. 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.01.074.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Zivadinov R, Poloni GU, Marr K, Schirda CV, Magnano CR, Carl E, Bergsland N, Hojnacki D, Kennedy C, Beggs CB, Dwyer MG, Weinstock-Guttman B: Decreased brain venous vasculature visibility on susceptibility-weighted imaging venography in patients with multiple sclerosis is related to chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency. BMC Neurol. 2011, 11: 128-10.1186/1471-2377-11-128.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Dawson JW: The histology of disseminated sclerosis. Trans Roy Soc Edinb. 1916, 50: 517-10.1017/S0080456800027174.Google Scholar
  11. Putnam TJ: Evidences of vascular occlusion in multiple sclerosis and encephalomyelitis. Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1937, 6: 1298-1321.Google Scholar
  12. Brown WR, Moody DM, Thore CR, Challa VR, Anstrom JA: Vascular dementia in leukoaraiosis may be a consequence of capillary loss not only in the lesions, but in normal-appearing white matter and cortex as well. J Neurol Sci. 2007, 257: 62-66. 10.1016/j.jns.2007.01.015.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Moody DM, Brown WR, Challa VR, Anderson RL: Periventricular venous collagenosis: association with leukoaraiosis. Radiology. 1995, 194: 469-476.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown WR, Moody DM, Thore CR, Anstrom JA, Challa VR: Microvascular changes in the white mater in dementia. J Neurol Sci. 2009, 283: 28-31. 10.1016/j.jns.2009.02.328.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Chung CP, Hu HH: Pathogenesis of leukoaraiosis: role of jugular venous reflux. Med Hypotheses. 2010, 75: 85-90. 10.1016/j.mehy.2010.01.042.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chung CP, Wang PN, Wu YH, Tsao YC, Sheng WY, Lin KN, Lin SJ, Hu HH: More severe white matter changes in the elderly with jugular venous reflux. Ann Neurol. 2011, 69: 553-559. 10.1002/ana.22276.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bateman GA: Pulse wave encephalopathy: a spectrum hypothesis incorporating Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia and normal pressure hydrocephalus. Med Hypotheses. 2004, 62: 182-187. 10.1016/S0306-9877(03)00330-X.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Law M, Saindane AM, Ge Y, Babb JS, Johnson G, Mannon LJ, Herbert J, Grossman RI: Microvascular abnormality in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: perfusion MR imaging findings in normal-appearing white matter. Radiology. 2004, 231: 645-652. 10.1148/radiol.2313030996.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ge Y, Law M, Johnson G, Herbert J, Babb JS, Mannon LJ, Grossman RI: Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions: characterizing hemodynamic impairment and inflammatory activity. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005, 26: 1539-1547.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Varga AW, Johnson G, Babb JS, Herbert J, Grossman RI, Inglese M: White matter hemodynamic abnormalities precede sub-cortical gray matter changes in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2009, 282: 28-33. 10.1016/j.jns.2008.12.036.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Adhya S, Johnson G, Herbert J, Jaggi H, Babb JS, Grossman RI, Inglese M: Pattern of hemodynamic impairment in multiple sclerosis: dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T. NeuroImage. 2006, 33: 1029-1035. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.008.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Moody DM, Brown WR, Challa VR, Ghazi-Birry HS, Reboussin DM: Cerebral microvascular alterations in aging, leukoaraiosis, and Alzheimer's disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997, 826: 103-116. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48464.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Brown WR, Thore CR: Review: cerebral microvascular pathology in ageing and neurodegeneration. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2011, 37: 56-74. 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2010.01139.x.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Dalton CM, Brex PA, Jenkins R, Fox NC, Miszkiel KA, Crum WR, O'Riordan JI, Plant GT, Thompson AJ, Miller DH: Progressive ventricular enlargement in patients with clinically isolated syndromes is associated with the early development of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002, 73: 141-147. 10.1136/jnnp.73.2.141.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Dalton CM, Miszkiel KA, O'Connor PW, Plant GT, Rice GP, Miller DH: Ventricular enlargement in MS: one-year change at various stages of disease. Neurology. 2006, 66: 693-698. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000201183.87175.9f.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bradley WG: Normal pressure hydrocephalus: new concepts on etiology and diagnosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000, 21: 1586-1590.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kitagaki H, Mori E, Ishii K, Yamaji S, Hirono N, Imamura T: CSF spaces in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: morphology and volumetry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998, 19: 1277-1284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Benedetti MG, Piperno R, Simoncini L, Bonato P, Tonini A, Giannini S: Gait abnormalities in minimally impaired multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler. 1999, 5: 363-368.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Briley DP, Wasay M, Sergent S, Thomas S: Cerebral white matter changes (leukoaraiosis), stroke, and gait disturbance. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997, 45: 1434-1438.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sakakibara R, Hattori T, Uchiyama T, Yamanishi T: Urinary function in elderly people with and without leukoaraiosis: relation to cognitive and gait function. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999, 67: 658-660. 10.1136/jnnp.67.5.658.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Mori E: Gait disturbance in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain Nerve. 2008, 60: 219-224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Chiaravalloti ND, DeLuca J: Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2008, 7: 1139-1151. 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70259-X.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Saito M, Nishio Y, Kanno S, Uchiyama M, Hayashi A, Takagi M, Kikuchi H, Yamasaki H, Shimomura T, Iizuka O, Mori E: Cognitive profile of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2011, 1: 202-211. 10.1159/000328924.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Fowler CJ, Panicker JN, Drake M, Harris C, Harrison SC, Kirby M, Lucas M, Macleod N, Mangnall J, North A, Porter B, Reid S, Russell N, Watkiss K, Wells M: A UK consensus on the management of the bladder in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009, 80: 470-477.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sakakibara R, Kanda T, Sekido T, Uchiyama T, Awa Y, Ito T, Liu Z, Yamamoto T, Yamanishi T, Yuasa T, Shirai K, Hattori T: Mechanism of bladder dysfunction in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008, 27: 507-510. 10.1002/nau.20547.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ge Y, Grossman RI, Udupa JK, Babb JS, Nyul LG, Kolson DL: Brain atrophy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: fractional volumetric analysis of gray matter and white matter. Radiology. 2001, 220: 606-610. 10.1148/radiol.2203001776.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ge Y, Grossman RI, Udupa JK, Wei L, Mannon LJ, Polansky M, Kolson DL: Brain atrophy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: longitudinal quantitative analysis. Radiology. 2000, 214: 665-670.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Bradley WG, Whittemore AR, Kortman KE, Watanabe AS, Homyak M, Teresi LM, Davis SJ: Marked cerebrospinal fluid void: indicator of successful shunt in patients with suspected normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Radiology. 1991, 178: 459-466.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Bradley WG: Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and shunt responsiveness in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002, 77: 507-508. 10.4065/77.6.507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. O'Sullivan M, Morris RG, Huckstep B, Jones DK, Williams SC, Markus HS: Diffusion tensor MRI correlates with executive dysfunction in patients with ischaemic leukoaraiosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004, 75: 441-447. 10.1136/jnnp.2003.014910.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Bruck W: The pathology of multiple sclerosis is the result of focal inflammatory demyelination with axonal damage. J Neurol. 2005, 252: v3-v9. 10.1007/s00415-005-5002-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Fernandez M, Giuliani A, Pirondi S, D'Intino G, Giardino L, Aloe L, Levi-Montalcini R, Calza L: Thyroid hormone administration enhances remyelination in chronic demyelinating inflammatory disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101: 16363-16368. 10.1073/pnas.0407262101.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Sloane JA, Batt C, Ma Y, Harris ZM, Trapp B, Vartanian T: Hyaluronan blocks oligodendrocyte progenitor maturation and remyelination through TLR2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010, 107: 11555-11560. 10.1073/pnas.1006496107.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Schwartz GL, Fornage M, Mosley T, Turner ST: Treatment of leukoaraiosis. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2005, 7: 173-177. 10.1007/s11936-005-0045-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Fog T: On the vessel-plaque relations in the brain in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 1963, 39: 258-262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Schelling F: Damaging venous reflux into the skull or spine: relevance to multiple sclerosis. Med Hypotheses. 1986, 21: 141-148. 10.1016/0306-9877(86)90003-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Talbert DG: Raised venous pressure as a factor in multiple sclerosis. Med Hypotheses. 2008, 70: 1112-1117. 10.1016/j.mehy.2007.10.009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Adams CW, Abdulla YH, Torres EM, Poston RN: Periventricular lesions in multiple sclerosis: their perivenous origin and relationship to granular ependymitis. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1987, 13: 141-152. 10.1111/j.1365-2990.1987.tb00177.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Adams CW: Perivascular iron deposition and other vascular damage in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988, 51: 260-265. 10.1136/jnnp.51.2.260.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Kidd D, Barkhof F, McConnell R, Algra PR, Allen IV, Revesz T: Cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 1999, 122: 17-26. 10.1093/brain/122.1.17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kermode AG, Thompson AJ, Tofts P, MacManus DG, Kendall BE, Kingsley DP, Moseley IF, Rudge P, McDonald WI: Breakdown of the blood–brain barrier precedes symptoms and other MRI signs of new lesions in multiple sclerosis. Pathogenetic and clinical implications. Brain. 1990, 113: 1477-1489. 10.1093/brain/113.5.1477.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Tan IL, van Schijndel RA, Pouwels PJ, van Walderveen MA, Reichenbach JR, Manoliu RA, Barkhof F: MR venography of multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000, 21: 1039-1042.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Tallantyre EC, Dixon JE, Donaldson I, Owens T, Morgan PS, Morris PG, Evangelou N: Ultra-high-field imaging distinguishes MS lesions from asymptomatic white matter lesions. Neurology. 2011, 76: 534-539. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820b7630.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Duvernoy HM, Delon S, Vannson JL: Cortical blood vessels of the human brain. Brain Res Bull. 1981, 7: 519-579. 10.1016/0361-9230(81)90007-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Gilmore CP, Donaldson I, Bo L, Owens T, Lowe J, Evangelou N: Regional variations in the extent and pattern of grey matter demyelination in multiple sclerosis: a comparison between the cerebral cortex, cerebellar cortex, deep grey matter nuclei and the spinal cord. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009, 80: 182-187. 10.1136/jnnp.2008.148767.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Young NP, Weinshenker BG, Parisi JE, Scheithauer B, Giannini C, Roemer SF, Thomsen KM, Mandrekar JN, Erickson BJ, Lucchinetti CF: Perivenous demyelination: association with clinically defined acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and comparison with pathologically confirmed multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2010, 133: 333-348. 10.1093/brain/awp321.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Pitt D, Boster A, Pei W, Wohleb E, Jasne A, Zachariah CR, Rammohan K, Knopp MV, Schmalbrock P: Imaging cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis with ultra-high-field magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Neurol. 2010, 67: 812-818. 10.1001/archneurol.2010.148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Sospedra M, Martin R: Immunology of multiple sclerosis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005, 23: 683-747. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115707.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Martin R, McFarland HF, McFarlin DE: Immunological aspects of demyelinating diseases. Annu Rev Immunol. 1992, 10: 153-187. 10.1146/annurev.iy.10.040192.001101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. D'Haeseleer M, Cambron M, Vanopdenbosch L, De Keyser J: Vascular aspects of multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2011, 10: 657-666. 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70105-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. De Keyser J, Steen C, Mostert JP, Koch MW: Hypoperfusion of the cerebral white matter in multiple sclerosis: possible mechanisms and pathophysiological significance. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008, 28: 1645-1651. 10.1038/jcbfm.2008.72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Lassmann H: Hypoxia-like tissue injury as a component of multiple sclerosis lesions. J Neurol Sci. 2003, 206: 187-191. 10.1016/S0022-510X(02)00421-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Al-Omari MH, Rousan LA: Internal jugular vein morphology and hemodynamics in patients with multiple sclerosis. Int Angiol. 2010, 29: 115-120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Beggs C, Shepherd S, Zamboni P: Cerebral venous outflow resistance and interpretation of cervical plethysmography data with respect to the diagnosis of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency. Phlebology. 2012, Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  65. Zamboni P, Menegatti E, Weinstock-Guttman B, Dwyer MG, Schirda CV, Malagoni AM, Hojnacki D, Kennedy C, Carl E, Bergsland N, Magnano C, Bartolomei I, Salvi F, Zivadinov R: Hypoperfusion of brain parenchyma is associated with the severity of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional preliminary report. BMC Med. 2011, 9: 22-10.1186/1741-7015-9-22.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Ge Y, Zohrabian VM, Osa EO, Xu J, Jaggi H, Herbert J, Haacke EM, Grossman RI: Diminished visibility of cerebral venous vasculature in multiple sclerosis by susceptibility-weighted imaging at 3.0 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009, 29: 1190-1194. 10.1002/jmri.21758.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Beggs CB, Shepherd SJ, Dwyer MG, Polak P, Magnano C, Carl E, Poloni G, Weinstein-Guttman B, Zivadinov R: Sensitivity and specificity of SWI venography for detection of cerebral venous alterations in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Res. 2012, 34: 793-801. 10.1179/1743132812Y.0000000048.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Brooks DJ, Leenders KL, Head G, Marshall J, Legg NJ, Jones T: Studies on regional cerebral oxygen utilisation and cognitive function in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984, 47: 1182-1191. 10.1136/jnnp.47.11.1182.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Lycke J, Wikkelso C, Bergh AC, Jacobsson L, Andersen O: Regional cerebral blood flow in multiple sclerosis measured by single photon emission tomography with technetium-99m hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime. Eur Neurol. 1993, 33: 163-167. 10.1159/000116926.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Sun X, Tanaka M, Kondo S, Okamoto K, Hirai S: Clinical significance of reduced cerebral metabolism in multiple sclerosis: a combined PET and MRI study. Ann Nucl Med. 1998, 12: 89-94. 10.1007/BF03164835.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Swank RL, Roth JG, Woody DC: Cerebral blood flow and red cell delivery in normal subjects and in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Res. 1983, 5: 37-59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Rashid W, Parkes LM, Ingle GT, Chard DT, Toosy AT, Altmann DR, Symms MR, Tofts PS, Thompson AJ, Miller DH: Abnormalities of cerebral perfusion in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004, 75: 1288-1293. 10.1136/jnnp.2003.026021.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Inglese M, Adhya S, Johnson G, Babb JS, Miles L, Jaggi H, Herbert J, Grossman RI: Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging correlates of neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008, 28: 164-171. 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Mancini M, Morra VB, Di Donato O, Maglio V, Lanzillo R, Liuzzi R, Salvatore E, Brunetti A, Iaccarino V, Salvatore M: Multiple sclerosis: cerebral circulation time. Radiology. 2012, 262: 947-955. 10.1148/radiol.11111239.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Cutler RW, Page L, Galicich J, Watters GV: Formation and absorption of cerebrospinal fluid in man. Brain. 1968, 91: 707-720. 10.1093/brain/91.4.707.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Ekstedt J: CSF hydrodynamic studies in man. 2. Normal hydrodynamic variables related to CSF pressure and flow. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1978, 41: 345-353. 10.1136/jnnp.41.4.345.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Magnano C, Schirda C, Weinstock-Guttman B, Wack DS, Lindzen E, Hojnacki D, Bergsland N, Kennedy C, Belov P, Dwyer MG, Poloni GU, Beggs CB, Zivadinov R: Cine cerebrospinal fluid imaging in multiple sclerosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012, 36: 825-834. 10.1002/jmri.23730.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Popescu BF, Lucchinetti CF: Meningeal and cortical grey matter pathology in multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol. 2012, 12: 11-10.1186/1471-2377-12-11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Kutzelnigg A, Lassmann H: Cortical demyelination in multiple sclerosis: a substrate for cognitive deficits?. J Neurol Sci. 2006, 245: 123-126. 10.1016/j.jns.2005.09.021.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Helenius J, Soinne L, Salonen O, Kaste M, Tatlisumak T: Leukoaraiosis, ischemic stroke, and normal white matter on diffusion-weighted MRI. Stroke. 2002, 33: 45-50. 10.1161/hs0102.101228.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Ylikoski R, Ylikoski A, Erkinjuntti T, Sulkava R, Raininko R, Tilvis R: White matter changes in healthy elderly persons correlate with attention and speed of mental processing. Arch Neurol. 1993, 50: 818-824. 10.1001/archneur.1993.00540080029009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. van Gijn J: Leukoaraiosis and vascular dementia. Neurology. 1998, 51: S3-S8. 10.1212/WNL.51.3_Suppl_3.S3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Kawamura J, Meyer JS, Terayama Y, Weathers S: Leukoaraiosis correlates with cerebral hypoperfusion in vascular dementia. Stroke. 1991, 22: 609-614. 10.1161/01.STR.22.5.609.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Inzitari D, Cadelo M, Marranci ML, Pracucci G, Pantoni L: Vascular deaths in elderly neurological patients with leukoaraiosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997, 62: 177-181. 10.1136/jnnp.62.2.177.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  85. Kawamura J, Meyer JS, Ichijo M, Kobari M, Terayama Y, Weathers S: Correlations of leuko-araiosis with cerebral atrophy and perfusion in elderly normal subjects and demented patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993, 56: 182-187. 10.1136/jnnp.56.2.182.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Simon J: Ischemia and multiple sclerosis: perfusion MR imaging provides insight into an underexplored pathophysiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005, 26: 1306-1308.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Jack CR, O'Brien PC, Rettman DW, Shiung MM, Xu Y, Muthupillai R, Manduca A, Avula R, Erickson BJ: FLAIR histogram segmentation for measurement of leukoaraiosis volume. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001, 14: 668-676. 10.1002/jmri.10011.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  88. Pantoni L, Garcia JH: Pathogenesis of leukoaraiosis: a review. Stroke. 1997, 28: 652-659. 10.1161/01.STR.28.3.652.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Inzitari D, Mascalchi M, Giordano GP, Marini P, Sita D, Abbamondi AL: Histopathological correlates of leuko-araiosis in patients with ischemic stroke. Eur Neurol. 1989, 29: 23-26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. O'Sullivan M, Lythgoe DJ, Pereira AC, Summers PE, Jarosz JM, Williams SC, Markus HS: Patterns of cerebral blood flow reduction in patients with ischemic leukoaraiosis. Neurology. 2002, 59: 321-326. 10.1212/WNL.59.3.321.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Markus HS, Lythgoe DJ, Ostegaard L, O'Sullivan M, Williams SC: Reduced cerebral blood flow in white matter in ischaemic leukoaraiosis demonstrated using quantitative exogenous contrast based perfusion MRI. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000, 69: 48-53. 10.1136/jnnp.69.1.48.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  92. Inzitari D, Diaz F, Fox A, Hachinski VC, Steingart A, Lau C, Donald A, Wade J, Mulic H, Merskey H: Vascular risk factors and leuko-araiosis. Arch Neurol. 1987, 44: 42-47. 10.1001/archneur.1987.00520130034014.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Inzitari D, Giordano GP, Ancona AL, Pracucci G, Mascalchi M, Amaducci L: Leukoaraiosis, intracerebral hemorrhage, and arterial hypertension. Stroke. 1990, 21: 1419-1423. 10.1161/01.STR.21.10.1419.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Wiszniewska M, Devuyst G, Bogousslavsky J, Ghika J, van Melle G: What is the significance of leukoaraiosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke?. Arch Neurol. 2000, 57: 967-973. 10.1001/archneur.57.7.967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Furuta A, Ishii N, Nishihara Y, Horie A: Medullary arteries in aging and dementia. Stroke. 1991, 22: 442-446. 10.1161/01.STR.22.4.442.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Fazekas F, Kleinert R, Offenbacher H, Schmidt R, Kleinert G, Payer F, Radner H, Lechner H: Pathologic correlates of incidental MRI white matter signal hyperintensities. Neurology. 1993, 43: 1683-1689. 10.1212/WNL.43.9.1683.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. van Swieten JC, van den Hout JH, van Ketel BA, Hijdra A, Wokke JH, van Gijn J: Periventricular lesions in the white matter on magnetic resonance imaging in the elderly. A morphometric correlation with arteriolosclerosis and dilated perivascular spaces. Brain. 1991, 114: 761-774. 10.1093/brain/114.2.761.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Brown WR, Moody DM, Challa VR, Thore CR, Anstrom JA: Venous collagenosis and arteriolar tortuosity in leukoaraiosis. J Neurol Sci. 2002, 203–204: 159-163.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Moody DM, Santamore WP, Bell MA: Does tortuosity in cerebral arterioles impair down-autoregulation in hypertensives and elderly normotensives? A hypothesis and computer model. Clin Neurosurg. 1991, 37: 372-387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Thore CR, Anstrom JA, Moody DM, Challa VR, Marion MC, Brown WR: Morphometric analysis of arteriolar tortuosity in human cerebral white matter of preterm, young, and aged subjects. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2007, 66: 337-345. 10.1097/nen.0b013e3180537147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Chung CP, Lin YJ, Chao AC, Lin SJ, Chen YY, Wang YJ, Hu HH: Jugular venous hemodynamic changes with aging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010, 36: 1776-1782. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.07.006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Bateman GA: Vascular compliance in normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000, 21: 1574-1585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Bateman GA: Vascular hydraulics associated with idiopathic and secondary intracranial hypertension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002, 23: 1180-1186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Guyton AC, Hall JE: Textbook of Medical Physiology. 2000, Philadelphia: Saunders, 10Google Scholar
  105. Shaaban AM, Duerinckx AJ: Wall shear stress and early atherosclerosis: a review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000, 174: 1657-1665. 10.2214/ajr.174.6.1741657.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Kiefer M, Unterberg A: The differential diagnosis and treatment of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012, 109: 15-25. quiz 26PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  107. Tsunoda A, Mitsuoka H, Bandai H, Endo T, Arai H, Sato K: Intracranial cerebrospinal fluid measurement studies in suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, secondary normal pressure hydrocephalus, and brain atrophy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002, 73: 552-555. 10.1136/jnnp.73.5.552.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  108. Hakim S, Adams RD: The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. J Neurol Sci. 1965, 2: 307-327. 10.1016/0022-510X(65)90016-X.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Hankey GJ, Wardlaw JM: Clinical Neurology. 2002, London: Manson PublishingGoogle Scholar
  110. Bateman GA: The reversibility of reduced cortical vein compliance in normal-pressure hydrocephalus following shunt insertion. Neuroradiology. 2003, 45: 65-70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Egnor M, Zheng L, Rosiello A, Gutman F, Davis R: A model of pulsations in communicating hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2002, 36: 281-303. 10.1159/000063533.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. El Sankari S, Gondry-Jouet C, Fichten A, Godefroy O, Serot JM, Deramond H, Meyer ME, Baledent O: Cerebrospinal fluid and blood flow in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a differential diagnosis from idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2011, 8: 12-10.1186/2045-8118-8-12.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  113. Miyati T, Mase M, Kasai H, Hara M, Yamada K, Shibamoto Y, Soellinger M, Baltes C, Luechinger R: Noninvasive MRI assessment of intracranial compliance in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007, 26: 274-278. 10.1002/jmri.20999.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Mase M, Miyati T, Kasai H, Demura K, Osawa T, Hara M, Shibamoto Y, Yamada K: Noninvasive estimation of intracranial compliance in idiopathic NPH using MRI. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2008, 102: 115-118. 10.1007/978-3-211-85578-2_23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Williams H: The venous hypothesis of hydrocephalus. Med Hypotheses. 2008, 70: 743-747. 10.1016/j.mehy.2007.08.013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Williams H: A unifying hypothesis for hydrocephalus, Chiari malformation, syringomyelia, anencephaly and spina bifida. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res. 2008, 5: 7-10.1186/1743-8454-5-7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  117. Rekate HL: A consensus on the classification of hydrocephalus: its utility in the assessment of abnormalities of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. Childs Nerv Syst. 2011, 27: 1535-1541. 10.1007/s00381-011-1558-y.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  118. Bradley WG: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: new findings and thoughts on etiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008, 29: 1-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Nakahara Y, Ogata A, Takase Y, Maeda K, Okamoto H, Matsushima T, Sakata S: Treatment of dural arteriovenous fistula presenting as typical symptoms of hydrocephalus caused by venous congestion: case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2011, 51: 229-232. 10.2176/nmc.51.229.Google Scholar
  120. Graff-Radford NR, Rezai K, Godersky JC, Eslinger P, Damasio H, Kirchner PT: Regional cerebral blood flow in normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987, 50: 1589-1596. 10.1136/jnnp.50.12.1589.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  121. Owler BK, Momjian S, Czosnyka Z, Czosnyka M, Péna A, Harris NG, Smielewski P, Fryer T, Donovan T, Coles J, Carpenter A, Pickard JD: Normal pressure hydrocephalus and cerebral blood flow: a PET study of baseline values. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004, 24: 17-23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Momjian S, Owler BK, Czosnyka Z, Czosnyka M, Pena A, Pickard JD: Pattern of white matter regional cerebral blood flow and autoregulation in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain. 2004, 127: 965-972. 10.1093/brain/awh131.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Larsson A, Bergh AC, Bilting M, Arlig A, Jacobsson L, Stephensen H, Wikkelso C: Regional cerebral blood flow in normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnostic and prognostic aspects. Eur J Nucl Med. 1994, 21: 118-123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Tullberg M, Jensen C, Ekholm S, Wikkelso C: Normal pressure hydrocephalus: vascular white matter changes on MR images must not exclude patients from shunt surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001, 22: 1665-1673.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Luetmer PH, Huston J, Friedman JA, Dixon GR, Petersen RC, Jack CR, McClelland RL, Ebersold MJ: Measurement of cerebrospinal fluid flow at the cerebral aqueduct by use of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: technique validation and utility in diagnosing idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2002, 50: 534-543. discussion 543–534PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Schroth G, Klose U: Cerebrospinal fluid flow. III. Pathological cerebrospinal fluid pulsations. Neuroradiology. 1992, 35: 16-24. 10.1007/BF00588272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Gideon P, Stahlberg F, Thomsen C, Gjerris F, Sorensen PS, Henriksen O: Cerebrospinal fluid flow and production in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus studied by MRI. Neuroradiology. 1994, 36: 210-215. 10.1007/BF00588133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Kim DS, Choi JU, Huh R, Yun PH, Kim DI: Quantitative assessment of cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics using a phase-contrast cine MR image in hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst. 1999, 15: 461-467. 10.1007/s003810050440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Bradley WG, Scalzo D, Queralt J, Nitz WN, Atkinson DJ, Wong P: Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging. Radiology. 1996, 198: 523-529.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Tullberg M, Mansson JE, Fredman P, Lekman A, Blennow K, Ekman R, Rosengren LE, Tisell M, Wikkelso C: CSF sulfatide distinguishes between normal pressure hydrocephalus and subcortical arteriosclerotic encephalopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000, 69: 74-81. 10.1136/jnnp.69.1.74.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  131. McCormick JM, Yamada K, Rekate HL, Miyake H: Time course of intraventricular pressure change in a canine model of hydrocephalus: its relationship to sagittal sinus elastance. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1992, 18: 127-133. 10.1159/000120650.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Olivero WC, Rekate HL, Chizeck HJ, Ko W, McCormick JM: Relationship between intracranial and sagittal sinus pressure in normal and hydrocephalic dogs. Pediatr Neurosci. 1988, 14: 196-201. 10.1159/000120388.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Algin O, Hakyemez B, Ocakoglu G, Parlak M: MR cisternography: is it useful in the diagnosis of normal-pressure hydrocephalus and the selection of "good shunt responders"?. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011, 17: 105-111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. Tator CH, Fleming JF, Sheppard RH, Turner VM: A radioisotopic test for communicating hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. 1968, 28: 327-340. 10.3171/jns.1968.28.4.0327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Wuerfel J, Paul F, Zipp F: Cerebral blood perfusion changes in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2007, 259: 16-20. 10.1016/j.jns.2007.02.011.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, McFarland HF, Paty DW, Polman CH, Reingold SC, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Sibley W, Thompson A, van den Noort S, Weinshenker BY, Wolinsky JS: Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2001, 50: 121-127. 10.1002/ana.1032.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Hulst HE, Geurts JJ: Gray matter imaging in multiple sclerosis: what have we learned?. BMC Neurol. 2011, 11: 153-10.1186/1471-2377-11-153.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  138. Minagar A, Alexander SJ: Blood–brain barrier disruption in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2003, 9: 540-549. 10.1191/1352458503ms965oa.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Kirk J, Plumb J, Mirakhur M, McQuaid S: Tight junctional abnormality in multiple sclerosis white matter affects all calibres of vessel and is associated with blood–brain barrier leakage and active demyelination. J Pathol. 2003, 201: 319-327. 10.1002/path.1434.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Wakefield AJ, More LJ, Difford J, McLaughlin JE: Immunohistochemical study of vascular injury in acute multiple sclerosis. J Clin Pathol. 1994, 47: 129-133. 10.1136/jcp.47.2.129.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  141. Aboul-Enein F, Lassmann H: Mitochondrial damage and histotoxic hypoxia: a pathway of tissue injury in inflammatory brain disease?. Acta Neuropathol. 2005, 109: 49-55. 10.1007/s00401-004-0954-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Ge Y, Zohrabian VM, Grossman RI: Seven-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: new vision of microvascular abnormalities in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 2008, 65: 812-816. 10.1001/archneur.65.6.812.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  143. Werring DJ, Brassat D, Droogan AG, Clark CA, Symms MR, Barker GJ, MacManus DG, Thompson AJ, Miller DH: The pathogenesis of lesions and normal-appearing white matter changes in multiple sclerosis: a serial diffusion MRI study. Brain. 2000, 123: 1667-1676. 10.1093/brain/123.8.1667.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. Wuerfel J, Bellmann-Strobl J, Brunecker P, Aktas O, McFarland H, Villringer A, Zipp F: Changes in cerebral perfusion precede plaque formation in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal perfusion MRI study. Brain. 2004, 127: 111-119. 10.1093/brain/awh007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Lochhead JJ, McCaffrey G, Quigley CE, Finch J, DeMarco KM, Nametz N, Davis TP: Oxidative stress increases blood–brain barrier permeability and induces alterations in occludin during hypoxia-reoxygenation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010, 30: 1625-1636. 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.29.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  146. Witt KA, Mark KS, Hom S, Davis TP: Effects of hypoxia-reoxygenation on rat blood–brain barrier permeability and tight junctional protein expression. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003, 285: H2820-H2831.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. Witt KA, Mark KS, Sandoval KE, Davis TP: Reoxygenation stress on blood–brain barrier paracellular permeability and edema in the rat. Microvasc Res. 2008, 75: 91-96. 10.1016/j.mvr.2007.06.004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. Plumb J, McQuaid S, Mirakhur M, Kirk J: Abnormal endothelial tight junctions in active lesions and normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis. Brain Pathol. 2002, 12: 154-169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Leech S, Kirk J, Plumb J, McQuaid S: Persistent endothelial abnormalities and blood–brain barrier leak in primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2007, 33: 86-98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. Kobari M, Meyer JS, Ichijo M, Oravez WT: Leukoaraiosis: correlation of MR and CT findings with blood flow, atrophy, and cognition. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1990, 11: 273-281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. Schmidt R, Enzinger C, Ropele S, Schmidt H, Fazekas F: Subcortical vascular cognitive impairment: similarities and differences with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2006, 245: 3-7. 10.1016/j.jns.2005.06.018.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. Graumann U, Reynolds R, Steck AJ, Schaeren-Wiemers N: Molecular changes in normal appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis are characteristic of neuroprotective mechanisms against hypoxic insult. Brain Pathol. 2003, 13: 554-573.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Fernando MS, Simpson JE, Matthews F, Brayne C, Lewis CE, Barber R, Kalaria RN, Forster G, Esteves F, Wharton SB, Shaw PJ, O'Brien JT, Ince PG, MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing Neuropathology Study Group: White matter lesions in an unselected cohort of the elderly: molecular pathology suggests origin from chronic hypoperfusion injury. Stroke. 2006, 37: 1391-1398. 10.1161/01.STR.0000221308.94473.14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. ten Dam VH, van den Heuvel DM, de Craen AJ, Bollen EL, Murray HM, Westendorp RG, Blauw GJ, van Buchem MA: Decline in total cerebral blood flow is linked with increase in periventricular but not deep white matter hyperintensities. Radiology. 2007, 243: 198-203. 10.1148/radiol.2431052111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. Schlesinger B: The venous drainage of the brain, with special reference to the galenic system. Brain. 1939, 62: 274-291. 10.1093/brain/62.3.274.Google Scholar
  156. San Millan Ruiz D, Delavelle J, Yilmaz H, Gailloud P, Piovan E, Bertramello A, Pizzini F, Rufenacht DA: Parenchymal abnormalities associated with developmental venous anomalies. Neuroradiology. 2007, 49: 987-995. 10.1007/s00234-007-0279-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. Dillon WP: Cryptic vascular malformations: controversies in terminology, diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997, 18: 1839-1846.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. Luce JM, Huseby JS, Kirk W, Butler J: A Starling resistor regulates cerebral venous outflow in dogs. J Appl Physiol. 1982, 53: 1496-1503.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. Vignes JR, Dagain A, Guerin J, Liguoro D: A hypothesis of cerebral venous system regulation based on a study of the junction between the cortical bridging veins and the superior sagittal sinus. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg. 2007, 107: 1205-1210. 10.3171/JNS-07/12/1205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  160. Holt JP: The collapse factor in the measurement of venous pressure. Am J Physiol. 1941, 134: 292-299.Google Scholar
  161. Katz AI, Chen Y, Moreno AH: Flow through a collapsible tube. Experimental analysis and mathematical model. Biophys J. 1969, 9: 1261-1279. 10.1016/S0006-3495(69)86451-9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  162. Lyon CK, Scott JB, Anderson DK, Wang CY: Flow through collapsible tubes at high Reynolds numbers. Circ Res. 1981, 49: 988-996. 10.1161/01.RES.49.4.988.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. Lyon CK, Scott JB, Wang CY: Flow through collapsible tubes at low Reynolds numbers. Applicability of the waterfall model. Circ Res. 1980, 47: 68-73. 10.1161/01.RES.47.1.68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. Schaller B: Physiology of cerebral venous blood flow: from experimental data in animals to normal function in humans. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2004, 46: 243-260. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.04.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. Zamboni P, Galeotti R, Menegatti E, Malagoni AM, Gianesini S, Bartolomei I, Mascoli F, Salvi F: A prospective open-label study of endovascular treatment of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg. 2009, 50: 1348-1358. 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.07.096. e1341-1343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. Egnor M, Rosiello A, Zheng L: A model of intracranial pulsations. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2001, 35: 284-298. 10.1159/000050440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. Wagshul ME, Eide PK, Madsen JR: The pulsating brain: a review of experimental and clinical studies of intracranial pulsatility. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2011, 8: 5-10.1186/2045-8118-8-5.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  168. Kim J, Thacker NA, Bromiley PA, Jackson A: Prediction of the jugular venous waveform using a model of CSF dynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007, 28: 983-989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  169. Ambarki K, Baledent O, Kongolo G, Bouzerar R, Fall S, Meyer ME: A new lumped-parameter model of cerebrospinal hydrodynamics during the cardiac cycle in healthy volunteers. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007, 54: 483-491.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  170. Alperin N, Vikingstad EM, Gomez-Anson B, Levin DN: Hemodynamically independent analysis of cerebrospinal fluid and brain motion observed with dynamic phase contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1996, 35: 741-754. 10.1002/mrm.1910350516.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. Kitano M, Oldendorf WH, Cassen B: The elasticity of the cranial blood pool. J Nucl Med. 1964, 5: 613-625.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  172. Zamboni P, Galeotti R: The chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency syndrome. Phlebology. 2010, 25: 269-279. 10.1258/phleb.2010.009083.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  173. Doepp F, Paul F, Valdueza JM, Schmierer K, Schreiber SJ: No cerebrocervical venous congestion in patients with multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2010, 68: 173-183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  174. Beggs CB: Multiple sclerosis appears to be associated with cerebral venous abnormalities. Ann Neurol. 2010, 68: 560-561. 10.1002/ana.22159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  175. Doepp F, Wurfel JT, Pfueller CF, Valdueza JM, Petersen D, Paul F, Schreiber SJ: Venous drainage in multiple sclerosis: a combined MRI and ultrasound study. Neurology. 2011, 77: 1745-1751. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318236f0ea.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  176. Mayer CA, Pfeilschifter W, Lorenz MW, Nedelmann M, Bechmann I, Steinmetz H, Ziemann U: The perfect crime? CCSVI not leaving a trace in MS. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011, 82: 436-440. 10.1136/jnnp.2010.231613.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  177. Khan O, Filippi M, Freedman MS, Barkhof F, Dore-Duffy P, Lassmann H, Trapp B, Bar-Or A, Zak I, Siegel MJ, Lisak R: Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency and multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2010, 67: 286-290. 10.1002/ana.22001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  178. Wattjes MP, Doepp F, Bendszus M, Fiehler J: Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency" in multiple sclerosis - is multiple sclerosis a disease of the cerebrospinal venous outflow system?. Rofo. 2011, 183: 523-530. 10.1055/s-0031-1273292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  179. Baracchini C, Atzori M, Gallo P: CCSVI and MS: no meaning, no fact. Neurol Sci. 2012, Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  180. Zivadinov R, Marr K, Cutter G, Ramanathan M, Benedict RH, Kennedy C, Elfadil M, Yeh AE, Reuther J, Brooks C, Hunt K, Andrews M, Carl E, Dwyer MG, Hojnacki D, Weinstock-Guttman B: Prevalence, sensitivity, and specificity of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in MS. Neurology. 2011, 77: 138-144. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318212a901.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  181. Simka M, Kostecki J, Zaniewski M, Majewski E, Hartel M: Extracranial Doppler sonographic criteria of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in the patients with multiple sclerosis. Int Angiol. 2010, 29: 109-114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  182. Zaniewski M, Kostecki J, Kuczmik W, Ziaja D, Opala G, Swiat M, Korzeniowski T, Majewski E, Urbanek T, Pawlicki K: Neck duplex Doppler ultrasound evaluation for assessing chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in multiple sclerosis patients. Phlebology. 2012, Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  183. Utriainen D, Feng W, Elias S, Latif Z, Hubbard D, Haacke EM: Using magnetic resonance imaging as a means to study chronic cerebral spinal venous insufficiency in multiple sclerosis patients. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012, 15: 101-112. 10.1053/j.tvir.2012.02.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  184. Haacke EM, Feng W, Utriainen D, Trifan G, Wu Z, Latif Z, Katkuri Y, Hewett J, Hubbard D: Patients with multiple sclerosis with structural venous abnormalities on MR imaging exhibit an abnormal flow distribution of the internal jugular veins. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012, 23: 60-68. 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.09.027. e61-63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  185. Yamout B, Herlopian A, Issa Z, Habib RH, Fawaz A, Salame J, Wadih A, Awdeh H, Muallem N, Raad R, Al-Kutoubi A: Extracranial venous stenosis is an unlikely cause of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2010, 16: 1341-1348. 10.1177/1352458510385268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  186. Bastianello S, Romani A, Viselner G, Tibaldi EC, Giugni E, Altieri M, Cecconi P, Mendozzi L, Farina M, Mariani D, Galassi A, Quattrini C, Mancini M, Bresciamorra V, Lagace A, McDonald S, Bono G, Bergamaschi R: Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in multiple sclerosis: clinical correlates from a multicentre study. BMC Neurol. 2011, 11: 132-10.1186/1471-2377-11-132.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  187. Krogias C, Schroder A, Wiendl H, Hohlfeld R, Gold R: Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency" and multiple sclerosis: critical analysis and first observation in an unselected cohort of MS patients. Nervenarzt. 2010, 81: 740-746. 10.1007/s00115-010-2972-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  188. Baracchini C, Perini P, Causin F, Calabrese M, Rinaldi F, Gallo P: Progressive multiple sclerosis is not associated with chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency. Neurology. 2011, 77: 844-850. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822c6208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  189. Wattjes MP, van Oosten BW, de Graaf WL, Seewann A, Bot JC, van den Berg R, Uitdehaag BM, Polman CH, Barkhof F: No association of abnormal cranial venous drainage with multiple sclerosis: a magnetic resonance venography and flow-quantification study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011, 82: 429-435. 10.1136/jnnp.2010.223479.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  190. Sundstrom P, Wahlin A, Ambarki K, Birgander R, Eklund A, Malm J: Venous and cerebrospinal fluid flow in multiple sclerosis: a case–control study. Ann Neurol. 2010, 68: 255-259. 10.1002/ana.22132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  191. Centonze D, Floris R, Stefanini M, Rossi S, Fabiano S, Castelli M, Marziali S, Spinelli A, Motta C, Garaci FG, Bernardi G, Simonetti G: Proposed chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency criteria do not predict multiple sclerosis risk or severity. Ann Neurol. 2011, 70: 51-58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  192. Laupacis A, Lillie E, Dueck A, Straus S, Perrier L, Burton JM, Aviv R, Thorpe K, Feasby T, Spears J: Association between chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency and multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2011, 183: E1203-E1212. 10.1503/cmaj.111074.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  193. Parvey HR, Eisenberg RL, Giyanani V, Krebs CA: Duplex sonography of the portal venous system: pitfalls and limitations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989, 152: 765-770. 10.2214/ajr.152.4.765.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  194. Taffoni MJ, Ravenel JG, Ackerman SJ: Prospective comparison of indirect CT venography versus venous sonography in ICU patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005, 185: 457-462. 10.2214/ajr.185.2.01850457.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  195. Menegatti E, Genova V, Tessari M, Malagoni AM, Bartolomei I, Zuolo M, Galeotti R, Salvi F, Zamboni P: The reproducibility of colour Doppler in chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency associated with multiple sclerosis. Int Angiol. 2010, 29: 121-126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  196. Monti L, Menci E, Ulivelli M, Cerase A, Bartalini S, Piu P, Marotti N, Leonini S, Galluzzi P, Romano DG, Casasco AE, Venturi C: Quantitative ColourDopplerSonography evaluation of cerebral venous outflow: a comparative study between patients with multiple sclerosis and controls. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e25012-10.1371/journal.pone.0025012.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  197. Zamboni P, Consorti G, Galeotti R, Gianesini S, Menegatti E, Tacconi G, Carinci F: Venous collateral circulation of the extracranial cerebrospinal outflow routes. Curr Neurovasc Res. 2009, 6: 204-212. 10.2174/156720209788970054.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  198. Higgins JN, Pickard JD: Lateral sinus stenoses in idiopathic intracranial hypertension resolving after CSF diversion. Neurology. 2004, 62: 1907-1908. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000125285.44539.D7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  199. Higgins JN, Owler BK, Cousins C, Pickard JD: Venous sinus stenting for refractory benign intracranial hypertension. Lancet. 2002, 359: 228-230. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07440-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  200. Moyer JH, Miller SI, Snyder H: Effect of increased jugular pressure on cerebral hemodynamics. J Appl Physiol. 1954, 7: 245-247.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  201. Chai PJ, Skaryak LA, Ungerleider RM, Greeley WJ, Kern FH, Schulman SR, Hansell DR, Auten RL, Mahaffey SF, Meliones JN: Jugular ligation does not increase intracranial pressure but does increase bihemispheric cerebral blood flow and metabolism. Crit Care Med. 1995, 23: 1864-1871. 10.1097/00003246-199511000-00013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  202. Bateman GA: Arterial inflow and venous outflow in idiopathic intracranial hypertension associated with venous outflow stenoses. J Clin Neurosci. 2008, 15: 402-408. 10.1016/j.jocn.2007.03.018.PubMedGoogle Scholar

    203. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/142/prepub

Copyright

© Beggs; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Medicine

ISSN: 1741-7015

Contact us