Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 27 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ian Clark |
| 3 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carmine Pariante |
| 6 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Urs Nater |
| 2 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Maes |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 2 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 16 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Urs Nater |
| 18 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carmine Pariante |
| 25 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Maes |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 25 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 3 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Maes |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 3 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 8 Mar 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 8 Mar 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-64 |
You can find further information about peer review here.