This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Peroxiredoxin 4: a multifunctional biomarker worthy of further exploration
© Schulte; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 26 August 2011
Accepted: 23 December 2011
Published: 23 December 2011
Currently, there is much interest in identifying clinically relevant biomarkers, as they have the potential to be high utility non-invasive tools for early diagnosis and reliable patient monitoring in numerous conditions. Since its discovery almost 15 years ago, research on the ubiquitous antioxidant enzyme peroxiredoxin 4 (Prx4) has culminated in the recognition that Prx4 levels are different in blood drawn from the healthy general population and patients with acute or chronic diseases. In this commentary, the most striking research data from different in vitro approaches, animal models and human observational studies are discussed collectively, highlighting the clinical importance of Prx4 as a multifunctional staging and prognosis biomarker. In this context, the oxidative state of patients may be reflected by intra- and extracellular Prx4 levels, redox state, oligomerization and nitro-oxidative modifications of the enzyme. A consolidated model of the potential role and origin of circulating Prx4 is presented to stimulate further investigations in light of the current biomarker situation.
Physiologically important processes such as redox signaling and host defense depend on balanced amounts of reactive oxygen species (ROS), including free radicals and stable oxidizing molecules, for example, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). In conditions of oxidative stress, increased ROS levels overwhelm antioxidant protection mechanisms, resulting in the development and progression of various diseases .
Peroxiredoxin 4 (Prx4; synonyms: AOE372, TRANK) is a ubiquitously expressed member of the peroxiredoxin family that is localized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and extracellular space [2, 3], with highest expression in the pancreas, liver and heart, and lowest expression in blood leukocytes and the brain [2, 4]. The enzyme diminishes oxidative stress by reducing hydrogen peroxide to water in a thiol-dependent catalytic cycle  and has been linked to the regulation of the key pro-inflammatory transcription factor, nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) [2, 4, 6]. In addition, redox-dependent and reversible conversion of homologous Prx1-4 from disulfide-linked homodimers to higher-order multimers and back provides a versatile mechanism to switch between peroxidase and chaperone activity, enabling interaction with binding partners including stress-responsive kinases, membrane proteins and immune-modulators, fine-tuning of H2O2 signaling  and, as published most recently, circadian clock oscillations . Disturbances in the aforementioned fundamental processes clearly result in numerous pathological conditions that could potentially be reflected by the measurement of involved Prx.
Among the six Prx isoforms in mammals, Prx4 emerges as the most attractive, easily accessible biomarker candidate as it was initially designated as a secretable peroxidase [2, 9], has recently been identified in the circulation of healthy and diseased individuals [10, 11] and, finally, has been linked to morbidity and mortality in patients with sepsis in the intensive care unit and patients with non-specific complaints in the emergency department [12, 13]. In addition, several studies have shown that the expression or oxidation state of Prx4 changes under pathological conditions such as cancer [14–20], diabetes [21–23] and infection [4, 6, 24–27].
Fast evolving genomic and proteomic studies constantly provide many new biomarker candidates, unavoidably lacking a differentiated evaluation of single candidates and possibly misdirecting promising fields of application. Hence, this commentary intends to discuss the available data on Prx4 at an early stage, focusing on the relevant clinical evidence that indicates strong biomarker potential in a number of conditions in critical care and the emergency room.
Clinical significance of Prx4 detection
Prx4 should be of special interest to clinicians as it may represent a new marker candidate that could be highly valuable in predicting the prognosis of an adverse outcome to risk stratify patients and to monitor therapy. Indeed, serum and expression levels, as well as post-translational modifications, of the enzyme have been linked to a number of different diseases, ranging from primary care to advanced critical care topics (see Additional file 1). The biomarker performance of Prx4 in these patients is truly encouraging, given the high heterogeneity and potential confounders, such as co-morbidities and medication. Indeed, Prx4 expression in the mouse liver was responsive to different drugs, including the analgesic paracetamol and the chemotherapeutic etoposide phosphate . Altogether, Prx4 is assumed to be important in many single settings, which is very promising, but requires further validation. The results found by Chang and colleagues , for instance, are methodologically questionable because they are based on an immunoassay that worked with diluted patient plasma directly coated to the solid phase, which strongly limits specific antibody binding. Moreover, findings from different cancer studies are in part contradictory, concluding either good [16, 18] or bad prognosis [14, 19] from increased Prx4 expression in tumor tissue. Specifically, sepsis , cancer  and cardiovascular disease  are candidate diseases where Prx4 measurement may be of particular use as they share redox and inflammatory dysregulation and frequently lack valid severity and risk assessment by non-invasive biomarkers.
Perspectives for Prx4 testing methods
An improved understanding of the redox regulation, structural assembly and activity of Prx4 would provide a better insight into analyzing Prx4 as a biomarker in tissue or serum. Conoidin A, a specific Prx activity inhibitor, is currently under evaluation . Tavender and Bulleid found Prx4 oxidation to be indicative of the degree of oxidative stress in the ER . Atherosclerotic plaque development (Full et al., unpublished data), viral infection of A549 lung adenocarcinoma epithelial cells  and stimulation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) with H2O2 and hydroperoxides  resulted in oxidation and a shifted isoelectric point of Prx4, respectively. Moreover, selective changes for either a putative 31-kDa precursor or 27-kDa secretable Prx4 have been reported in lung cancer  and spermatogenesis disorders [35, 36]. Consequently, detection of Prx4 hyperoxidation and oligomerization [3, 25, 37, 38] could be a meaningful, albeit challenging, measure of thiol-redox imbalances and should be integrated into Prx4 analysis. Existing expression data, however, require careful interpretation in light of a newly discovered 29.5-kDa splice variant of Prx4  that cannot be recognized by the antibodies used in the immunoassay that has been developed for the detection of Prx4 dimers and oligomers in serum .
Origin and drivers of circulating Prx4
Consequences of Prx4 modification
It seems reasonable by now to expand basic clinical research from exclusive expression studies to mechanisms of Prx4 release, oligomerization and oxidative modification in order to identify relevant biochemical interrelations and refine the actual biomarker value of Prx4. Present data indicate that Prx4, either intracellular or extracellular, has the potential to serve as a biomarker for both the early staging of disease severity and the prediction of the future disease course in different pathologies that involve dysregulation of the redox system, for example, as evident during inflammatory processes. Accordingly, it is recommended that promising results from recent studies be validated and clinical trials be performed in new indications to ultimately assess the overall use of Prx4 for risk stratification and therapy monitoring in comparison with existing standards.
The author is indebted to Dr Joachim Struck for reviewing the manuscript.
- Dalle-Donne I, Rossi R, Colombo R, Giustarini D, Milzani A: Biomarkers of oxidative damage in human disease. Clin Chem. 2006, 52 (4): 601-623. 10.1373/clinchem.2005.061408.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haridas V, Ni J, Meager A, Su J, Yu GL, Zhai Y, Kyaw H, Akama KT, Hu J, Van Eldik L, Aggarwal BB: TRANK, a novel cytokine that activates NF-kappa B and c-Jun N-terminal kinase. J Immunol. 1998, 161 (1): 1-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tavender TJ, Bulleid NJ: Peroxiredoxin IV protects cells from oxidative stress by removing H2O2 produced during disulphide formation. J Cell Sci. 2010, 123 (Pt 15): 2672-2679.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jin D-Y, Chae HZ, Rhee SG, Jeang K-T: Regulatory role for a novel human thioredoxin peroxidase in NF-kB activation. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272 (49): 30952-30961. 10.1074/jbc.272.49.30952.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wood ZA, Schröder E, Harris JR, Poole LB: Structure, mechanism and regulation of peroxiredoxins. Trends Biochem Sci. 2003, 28 (1): 32-40. 10.1016/S0968-0004(02)00003-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu S, Mu Y, Ao J, Chen X: Peroxiredoxin IV regulates pro-inflammatory responses in large yellow croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea) and protects against bacterial challenge. J Proteome Res. 2010, 9 (3): 1424-1436. 10.1021/pr900961x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rhee SG, Woo HA: Multiple functions of peroxiredoxins: peroxidases, sensors and regulators of the intracellular messenger H2O2, and protein chaperones. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011, 15 (3): 781-794. 10.1089/ars.2010.3393.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Neill JS, Reddy AB: Circadian clocks in human red blood cells. Nature. 2011, 469 (7331): 498-503. 10.1038/nature09702.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Okado-Matsumoto A, Matsumoto A, Fujii J, Taniguchi N: Peroxiredoxin IV is a secretable protein with heparin-binding properties under reduced conditions. J Biochem. 2000, 127 (3): 493-501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chang X, Cui Y, Zong M, Zhao Y, Yan X, Chen Y, Han J: Identification of proteins with increased expression in rheumatoid arthritis synovial tissues. J Rheumatol. 2009, 36 (5): 872-880. 10.3899/jrheum.080939.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schulte J, Struck J, Bergmann A, Köhrle J: Immunoluminometric assay for quantification of peroxiredoxin 4 in human serum. Clin Chim Acta. 2010, 411 (17-18): 1258-1263. 10.1016/j.cca.2010.05.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nickel CH, Ruedinger J, Misch F, Blume K, Maile S, Schulte J, Köhrle J, Hartmann O, Giersdorf S, Bingisser R: Copeptin and peroxiredoxin-4 independently predict mortality in patients with nonspecific complaints presenting to the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2011, 18 (8): 851-859. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01126.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schulte J, Struck J, Köhrle J, Müller B: Circulating levels of peroxiredoxin 4 as a novel biomarker of oxidative stress in patients with sepsis. Shock. 2011, 35 (5): 460-465. 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3182115f40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soini Y, Haapasaari KM, Vaarala MH, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T, Kärjä V, Karihtala P: 8-hydroxydeguanosine and nitrotyrosine are prognostic factors in urinary bladder carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2011, 4 (3): 267-275.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chen G, Gharib TG, Huang CC, Thomas DG, Shedden KA, Taylor JM, Kardia SL, Misek DE, Giordano TJ, Iannettoni MD, Orringer MB, Hanash SM, Beer DG: Proteomic analysis of lung adenocarcinoma: identification of a highly expressed set of proteins in tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2002, 8 (7): 2298-2305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karihtala P, Soini Y, Vaskivuo L, Bloigu R, Puistola U: DNA adduct 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, a novel putative marker of prognostic significance in ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009, 19 (6): 1047-1051. 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181ad0f0d.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karihtala P, Kauppila S, Soini Y, Jukkola-Vuorinen A: Oxidative stress and counteracting mechanisms in hormone receptor positive, triple-negative and basal-like breast carcinomas. BMC Cancer. 2011, 11: 262-10.1186/1471-2407-11-262.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Karihtala P, Mantyniemi A, Kang SW, Kinnula VL, Soini Y: Peroxiredoxins in breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2003, 9 (9): 3418-3424.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chang KP, Yu JS, Chien KY, Lee CW, Liang Y, Liao CT, Yen TC, Lee LY, Huang LL, Liu SC, Chang YS, Chi LM: Identification of PRDX4 and P4HA2 as metastasis-associated proteins in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma by comparative tissue proteomics of microdissected specimens using iTRAQ technology. J Proteome Res. 2011, 10 (11): 4935-4947. 10.1021/pr200311p.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Basu A, Banerjee H, Rojas H, Martinez SR, Roy S, Jia Z, Lilly MB, De León M, Casiano CA: Differential expression of peroxiredoxins in prostate cancer: consistent upregulation of PRDX3 and PRDX4. Prostate. 2011, 71 (7): 755-765. 10.1002/pros.21292.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dreja T, Jovanovic Z, Rasche A, Kluge R, Herwig R, Tung YC, Joost HG, Yeo GS, Al-Hasani H: Diet-induced gene expression of isolated pancreatic islets from a polygenic mouse model of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetologia. 2010, 53 (2): 309-320. 10.1007/s00125-009-1576-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jiang YL, Ning Y, Ma XL, Liu YY, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Shan CX, Xu YD, Yin LM, Yang YQ: Alteration of the proteome profile of the pancreas in diabetic rats induced by streptozotocin. Int J Mol Med. 2011, 28 (2): 153-160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xie X, Li S, Liu S, Lu Y, Shen P, Ji J: Proteomic analysis of mouse islets after multiple low-dose streptozotocin injection. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008, 1784 (2): 276-284.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang X, Zhang S, Sun C, Yuan ZG, Wu X, Wang D, Ding Z, Hu R: Proteomic profiles of mouse neuro n2a cells infected with variant virulence of rabies viruses. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011, 21 (4): 366-373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jamaluddin M, Wiktorowicz JE, Soman KV, Boldogh I, Forbus JD, Spratt H, Garofalo RP, Brasier AR: Role of peroxiredoxin 1 and peroxiredoxin 4 in protection of respiratory syncytial virus-induced cysteinyl oxidation of nuclear cytoskeletal proteins. J Virol. 2010, 84 (18): 9533-9545. 10.1128/JVI.01005-10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Knight M, Raghavan N, Goodall C, Cousin C, Ittiprasert W, Sayed A, Miller A, Williams DL, Bayne CJ: Biomphalaria glabrata peroxiredoxin: effect of Schistosoma mansoni infection on differential gene regulation. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2009, 167 (1): 20-31. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2009.04.002.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mota S, Mendes M, Freitas N, Penque D, Coelho AV, Cunha C: Proteome analysis of a human liver carcinoma cell line stably expressing hepatitis delta virus ribonucleoproteins. J Proteomics. 2009, 72 (4): 616-627. 10.1016/j.jprot.2008.12.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Young R, Hayes JD, Brown K, Wolf CR, Whitelaw CB: Peroxiredoxin gene expression signatures in liver reflect toxic insult. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2010, 8 (4): 512-517. 10.1089/adt.2009.0246.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anderson R, Schmidt R: Clinical biomarkers in sepsis. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2010, 2: 504-520.Google Scholar
- Reuter S, Gupta SC, Chaturvedi MM, Aggarwal BB: Oxidative stress, inflammation, and cancer: how are they linked?. Free Radic Biol Med. 2010, 49 (11): 1603-1616. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.09.006.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Uno K, Nicholls SJ: Biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in atherosclerosis. Biomark Med. 2010, 4 (3): 361-373. 10.2217/bmm.10.57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu G, Botting CH, Evans KM, Walton JAG, Xu G, Slawin AMZ, Westwood NJ: Optimisation of conoidin A, a peroxiredoxin inhibitor. Chem Med Chem. 2010, 5: 41-45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mitsumoto A, Takanezawa Y, Okawa K, Iwamatsu A, Nakagawa Y: Variants of peroxiredoxins expression in response to hydroperoxide stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2001, 30 (6): 625-635. 10.1016/S0891-5849(00)00503-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lehtonen ST, Svensk AM, Soini Y, Paakko P, Hirvikoski P, Kang SW, Saily M, Kinnula VL: Peroxiredoxins, a novel protein family in lung cancer. Int J Cancer. 2004, 111 (4): 514-521. 10.1002/ijc.20294.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huo R, He Y, Zhao C, Guo X-J, Lin M, Sha J-H: Identification of human spermatogenesis-related proteins by comparative proteomic analysis: a preliminary study. Fertil Steril. 2008, 90 (4): 1109-1118. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1342.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsuki S, Sasagawa I, Iuchi Y, Fujii J: Impaired expression of peroxiredoxin 4 in damaged testes by artificial cryptorchidism. Redox Rep. 2002, 7 (5): 276-278. 10.1179/135100002125000785.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ikeda Y, Ito R, Ihara H, Okada T, Fujii J: Expression of N-terminally truncated forms of rat peroxiredoxin-4 in insect cells. Protein Expr Purif. 2010, 72 (1): 1-7. 10.1016/j.pep.2010.02.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Flaherty C, Rico de Souza A: Hydrogen peroxide modifies human sperm peroxiredoxins in a dose-dependent manner. Biol Reprod. 2011, 84 (2): 238-247. 10.1095/biolreprod.110.085712.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yim SH, Kim YJ, Oh SY, Fujii J, Zhang Y, Gladyshev VN, Rhee SG: Identification and characterization of an alternatively transcribed form of peroxiredoxin IV that is specifically expressed in spermatids of the postpubertal mouse testis. J Biol Chem. 2011, 286 (45): 39002-39012. 10.1074/jbc.M111.257220.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pérez-Sánchez J, Bermejo-Nogales A, Calduch-Giner JA, Kaushik S, Sitjà-Bobadilla A: Molecular characterization and expression analysis of six peroxiredoxin paralogous genes in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata): insights from fish exposed to dietary, pathogen and confinement stressors. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2011, 31 (2): 294-302. 10.1016/j.fsi.2011.05.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qiu L, Ma Z, Jiang S, Wang W, Zhou F, Huang J, Li J, Yang Q: Molecular cloning and mRNA expression of peroxiredoxin gene in black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon). Mol Biol Rep. 2010, 37 (6): 2821-2827. 10.1007/s11033-009-9832-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hazane-Puch F, Benaraba R, Valenti K, Osman M, Laporte F, Favier A, Anderson RA, Roussel AM, Hininger-Favier I: Chromium III histidinate exposure modulates gene expression in HaCaT human keratinocytes exposed to oxidative stress. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2010, 137 (1): 23-39. 10.1007/s12011-009-8557-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diet A, Abbas K, Bouton C, Guillon B, Tomasello F, Fourquet S, Toledano MB, Drapier JC: Regulation of peroxiredoxins by nitric oxide in immunostimulated macrophages. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282 (50): 36199-36205. 10.1074/jbc.M706420200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pylväs M, Puistola U, Kauppila S, Soini Y, Karihtala P: Oxidative stress-induced antioxidant enzyme expression is an early phenomenon in ovarian carcinogenesis. Eur J Cancer. 2010, 46 (9): 1661-1667. 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hayder N, Bouhlel I, Skandrani I, Kadri M, Steiman R, Guiraud P, Mariotte AM, Ghedira K, Dijoux-Franca MG, Chekir-Ghedira L: In vitro antioxidant and antigenotoxic potentials of myricetin-3-o-galactoside and myricetin-3-o-rhamnoside from Myrtus communis: modulation of expression of genes involved in cell defence system using cDNA microarray. Toxicol In Vitro. 2008, 22 (3): 567-581. 10.1016/j.tiv.2007.11.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hansen J, Palmfeldt J, Vang S, Corydon TJ, Gregersen N, Bross P: Quantitative proteomics reveals cellular targets of celastrol. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (10): e26634-10.1371/journal.pone.0026634.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yerbury JJ, Stewart EM, Wyatt AR, Wilson MR: Quality control of protein folding in extracellular space. EMBO Rep. 2005, 6 (12): 1131-1136. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400586.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Palande K, Roovers O, Gits J, Verwijmeren C, Iuchi Y, Fujii J, Neel BG, Karisch R, Tavernier J, Touw IP: Peroxiredoxin-controlled G-CSF signalling at the endoplasmic reticulum-early endosome interface. J Cell Sci. 2011, 124 (Pt 21): 3695-3705.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Park JJ, Chang HW, Jeong EJ, Roh JL, Choi SH, Jeon SY, Ko GH, Kim SY: Peroxiredoxin IV protects cells from radiation-induced apoptosis in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009, 73 (4): 1196-1202. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.070.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang HQ, Du ZX, Liu BQ, Gao YY, Meng X, Guan Y, Zhang HY: TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand suppresses PRDX4 expression. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583 (9): 1511-1515. 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.04.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crowley-Weber CL, Payne CM, Gleason-Guzman M, Watts GS, Futscher B, Waltmire CN, Crowley C, Dvorakova K, Bernstein C, Craven M, Garewal H, Bernstein H: Development and molecular characterization of HCT-116 cell lines resistant to the tumor promoter and multiple stress-inducer, deoxycholate. Carcinogenesis. 2002, 23 (12): 2063-2080. 10.1093/carcin/23.12.2063.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee YS, Chang HW, Jeong JE, Lee SW, Kim SY: Proteomic analysis of two head and neck cancer cell lines presenting different radiation sensitivity. Acta Otolaryngol. 2008, 128 (1): 86-92. 10.1080/00016480601110196.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shen C, Nathan C: Nonredundant antioxidant defense by multiple two-cysteine peroxiredoxins in human prostate cancer cells. Mol Med. 2002, 8 (2): 95-102.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/9/137/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.