- Open Access
The importance of including dynamic social networks when modeling epidemics of airborne infections: does increasing complexity increase accuracy?
© Blower and Go; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 27 April 2011
- Accepted: 19 July 2011
- Published: 19 July 2011
Mathematical models are useful tools for understanding and predicting epidemics. A recent innovative modeling study by Stehle and colleagues addressed the issue of how complex models need to be to ensure accuracy. The authors collected data on face-to-face contacts during a two-day conference. They then constructed a series of dynamic social contact networks, each of which was used to model an epidemic generated by a fast-spreading airborne pathogen. Intriguingly, Stehle and colleagues found that increasing model complexity did not always increase accuracy. Specifically, the most detailed contact network and a simplified version of this network generated very similar results. These results are extremely interesting and require further exploration to determine their generalizability.
Please see related article BMC Medicine, 2011, 9:87
- Social Contact
- Epidemic Model
- Contact Network
- Short Incubation Time
Mathematical models have long been used to predict epidemic dynamics; in fact, models were first used over 200 years ago to study the effect of vaccination on smallpox epidemics . Epidemic models can range from the very simple, consisting of only a few equations, to being so complex that they need to be simulated on supercomputers. Currently, a hotly debated issue in mathematical epidemiology is what degree of detail should be included in an epidemic model . Simple models are built on few assumptions and are therefore more transparent; hence they can provide clear insights into the factors that drive an epidemic. However, if a model represents reality too simply, it is unlikely to be a useful tool for understanding and predicting epidemics. Complex models include many details and therefore may appear to be more "realistic" and accurate than simple models. However, complex models are based on many assumptions that are generally not evaluated to determine whether they are correct, and they can also include hundreds of parameters whose values are unknown or only imprecisely known. Consequently, complex models are not necessarily more accurate than simple models. The recent research by Stehle et al.  addressed the issue of simplicity versus complexity, and their results show that increasing the complexity of a model does not always increase accuracy.
The main objective of the study conducted by Stehle et al.  was to determine how much information about the properties of the social contact network was necessary to accurately characterize an epidemic. They characterized epidemics in terms of the total number of infected individuals (that is, final size) and the number of days needed to reach the maximum incidence (that is, peak time). "Incidence" is defined as the number of individuals infected each day. Stehle et al. used their data set to construct a series of dynamic networks and then used these networks to simulate epidemics of two unspecified airborne pathogens. Both pathogens had similar biological properties, short incubation times (one to two days) and short infectious periods (two to four days). Networks were specified in terms of four properties: the number of contacts for each individual, the duration of contacts between participants, the order of contacts (that is, sequence) and the contact correlation. The value of the network's contact correlation was estimated by comparing network data collected on day 1 with network data collected on day 2. Specifically, they determined whether an individual who had a social contact with a particular individual on day 1 also had a contact with this individual on day 2. A total of nine networks were assessed, one of which was the observed network and the remaining eight of which were constructed by using the empirical data but varying the duration of contacts between participants, the order of contacts and the contact correlation. Unexpectedly, the results showed that even if the contact correlation is low in comparison with that of the observed network, the time needed for the epidemic to reach the maximum incidence is similar. However, if the contact correlation is much lower, the time required for the epidemic to reach the maximum incidence is considerably longer. Interestingly, Stehle et al. found that the network properties did not affect the final size of the epidemic if the attack rate (that is, the proportion of people infected by the end of the epidemic) was less than 10%. However, if the attack rate was greater than 10%, two properties of the network became important. They found that the lower the contact correlation, the larger the epidemic. In addition, the epidemic was even larger if the population average for the duration of contacts was used rather than the observed data for the duration of contacts between individuals. Notably, whether the network included the same order of contacts as observed in the data did not change the final size of the epidemic. The results of this study are new and surprising. They show that a more complex, detailed model may offer only a marginal improvement over simpler models that incorporate fewer, but key, details.
Stehle et al.  assessed the effects of dynamic social networks on the transmission of unspecified airborne pathogens with short incubation times and short infectious periods. The degree to which their results can be generalized to other pathogens and to other settings is not clear and should be the subject of future research. We suggest that it would be especially important to investigate other airborne pathogens that have longer incubation times and longer infectious periods, such as influenza, measles and tuberculosis; individuals with tuberculosis remain infectious for years. It would also be extremely interesting to use their modeling approach to try to determine the level of detail that must be included when modeling the transmission of sexually transmitted infections, such as HIV, using sexual contact networks . Stehle et al.  have made a very important contribution to the modeling debate on simplicity versus complexity. Their results have significant implications for both data collection and model construction. They have shown that even if it is possible to collect very detailed data, it may not be necessary. Furthermore, they have shown that parsimonious models can sometimes be as good as complex models.
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (to MHG and SB) and the John Simon Guggenheim Foundation (to SB). The sponsors had no role in the preparation, review or approval of the manuscript.
- Blower S, Bernoulli D: An attempt at a new analysis of the mortality caused by smallpox and of the advantages of inoculation to prevent it. Rev Med Virol. 2004, 14: 275-288. 10.1002/rmv.443.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smieszek T: A mechanistic model of infection: why duration and intensity of contacts should be included in models of disease spread. Theor Biol Med Model. 2009, 6: 25-10.1186/1742-4682-6-25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Stehle J, Voirin N, Barrat A, Cattuto C, Colizza V, Isella L, Regis C, Pinton J, Khanafer N, Van den Broeck W, Vanhems P: Simulation of an SEIR infectious disease model on the dynamic contact network of conference attendees. BMC Med.Google Scholar
- Read JM, Eames KT, Edmunds WJ: Dynamic social networks and the implications for the spread of infectious disease. J R Soc Interface. 2008, 5: 1001-1007. 10.1098/rsif.2008.0013.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Beutels P, Shkedy Z, Aerts M, Van Damme P: Social mixing patterns for transmission models of close contact infections: exploring self-evaluation and diary-based data collection through a web-based interface. Epidemiol Infect. 2006, 134: 1158-1166. 10.1017/S0950268806006418.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Edmunds WJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Nokes DJ: Who mixes with whom? A method to determine the contact patterns of adults that may lead to the spread of airborne infections. Proc Biol Sci. 1997, 264: 949-957. 10.1098/rspb.1997.0131.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cattuto C, Van den Broeck W, Barrat A, Colizza V, Pinton JF, Vespignani A: Dynamics of person-to-person interactions from distributed RFID sensor networks. PloS One. 2010, 5: e11596-10.1371/journal.pone.0011596.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Liljeros F, Edling CR, Amaral LA, Stanley HE, Aberg Y: The web of human sexual contacts. Nature. 2001, 411: 907-908. 10.1038/35082140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/9/88/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.