- Open Access
Correction to: Outcomes of notifications to health practitioner boards: a retrospective cohort study
BMC Medicine volume 16, Article number: 38 (2018)
- The original article was published in BMC Medicine 2016 14:198
The original article  contains a major error whereby all rates in Table 2 are mistakenly presented as 50% of their true values; this error was caused by a miscalculation in annualising the original values that represented the rates.
The correct version of Table 2 can be seen below whereby each rate is presented without having been divided by two, and each rate’s units are expressed as being ‘per 1000 practitioner years’ rather than ‘per 1000 practitioners per year’. This Table should be taken into account over the version of Table 2 seen in the original article .
The error had no effect on the statistical significance of any values presented, nor did it affect other results reported in the paper.
Further to the above, a list of corrections to the main body relating to the errors in the original Figure 2 is located below:
Results: There were 8307 notifications. The notification rate was highest among doctors (IR = 29.0 per 1000 practitioner years) and dentists (IR = 41.4) and lowest among nurses and midwives (IR = 4.1).
In 2011–2012, 8307 notifications pertaining to 6920 practitioners were lodged with AHPRA. The overall rate was 12.7 notifications per 1000 practitioner years (95% CI, 12.4 to 12.9).
Notification rates differed by profession, age, sex, and jurisdiction (Table 2). After adjusting for all of the variables shown in Table 2 plus jurisdiction, dentists had the highest rate of notifications (41.4 per 1000 practitioner years), followed by doctors (29.0 per 1000 practitioner years). Nurses and midwives had the lowest rate of notifications (4.1 per 1000 practitioner years). Risk of notification generally increased with age – practitioners aged ≤ 25 years were at lowest risk (5.2 per 1000 practitioner years) and practitioners aged 56–65 years were at highest risk (16.4 per 1000 practitioner years). Men were at much higher risk of notification than women (17.9 vs. 7.9 per 1000 practitioner years). Notification rates did not differ by remoteness of practice location (P = 0.48), but did by jurisdiction (P < 0.0001).
This study of notifications lodged over a 2-year period against practitioners from 10 health professions found an overall rate of 13 notifications per 1000 practitioner years.
Finally, the authors would like to note that in Reference 31 (see reference  here), the author ‘Patterson’ should instead be displayed as ‘Paterson’.
Spittal MJ, et al. Outcomes of notifications to health practitioner boards: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Med. 2016;14:198.
Paterson R. The good doctor: what patients want. Auckland: Auckland University Press; 2012.
The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0748-6.
About this article
Cite this article
Spittal, M.J., Studdert, D.M., Paterson, R. et al. Correction to: Outcomes of notifications to health practitioner boards: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Med 16, 38 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1030-x