Skip to main content

Table 3 Regression analysis between log(ntr) and explanatory variables including log(Nim), log(f20° ), and log(GDP )

From: Quantifying the risk of local Zika virus transmission in the contiguous US during the 2015–2016 ZIKV epidemic

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

log(Nim)

0.72∗∗∗ (0.69, 0.74)

0.48∗∗∗ (0.45, 0.51)

0.49∗∗∗ (0.46, 0.52)

log(f20°)

2.18∗∗∗ (1.89, 2.48)

3.40∗∗∗ (3.01, 3.78)

 

log(GDP)

− 13.29∗∗∗ (− 14.20, − 12.38)

  

R squared

74.9%

57.9%

47.5%

  1. In model 1, all three explanatory variables log(Nim), log(f20°), and log(GDP) are included. Model 2 includes log(Nim) and log(f20° ). Model 3 only includes log(Nim). For each model, we report the regression coefficient (95% CI) for each of the explanatory variables along with R squared, based on n = 1220 cells
  2. ntr average number of local ZIKV transmissions within each 0.25° × 0.25° cell from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2016, Nim number of ZIKV importations, f20° fraction of days with temperature higher than 20 °C, GDP gross domestic product per capita in purchasing power parity
  3. ***p < 0.001
Back to article page

BMC Medicine

ISSN: 1741-7015

Contact us