Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Safety, activity, and molecular heterogeneity following neoadjuvant non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer (Opti-HER HEART): an open-label, single-group, multicenter, phase 2 trial

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3, 4, 5,
  • 2, 6,
  • 5, 7,
  • 5,
  • 3,
  • 8,
  • 9,
  • 3, 4,
  • 10,
  • 11,
  • 12,
  • 13,
  • 14,
  • 15,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 16,
  • 17 and
  • 3, 4, 5Email authorView ORCID ID profile
BMC Medicine201917:8

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1233-1

  • Received: 20 August 2018
  • Accepted: 10 December 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

The Opti-HER HEART trial aimed to optimize activity while minimizing cardiac risk by combining trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and paclitaxel with non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer.

Methods

Patients with stage II–IIIB HER2-positive breast cancer received neoadjuvant trastuzumab, pertuzumab, paclitaxel, and a non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin every three weeks for six cycles. The primary endpoint was cardiac safety during neoadjuvant therapy. Type A (symptomatic congestive heart failure) and B (asymptomatic reduction of left ventricular ejection fraction) cardiac events were evaluated. Secondary endpoints included the evaluation of the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and overall response rate, among others. As an ad-hoc exploratory analysis, the expression of 55 breast cancer-related genes, including the PAM50 genes, was measured in 58 baseline tumor samples and 60 surgical specimens.

Results

Eighty-three patients were recruited. The incidence of cardiac events during neoadjuvant treatment was 2.4%. No type A cardiac event was observed. The overall pCR rate was 56.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 45.3–67.5%). The HER2-enriched subtype, which represented 52.0% of all baseline samples, was associated with a higher pCR rate compared to non-HER2-enriched tumors (83.3% vs. 46.3%; odds ratio 5.76, 95% CI 1.71–19.42). The association of subtype with pCR was independent of known clinicopathological variables, including hormone receptor status. Compared to baseline samples, surgical specimens showed a significant downregulation of proliferation-related genes (MKI67 and CCNB1) and ERBB2 levels, and a significant upregulation of luminal-related (ESR1 and PGR) and immune (CD8A) genes.

Conclusions

The combination of dual HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab with paclitaxel and non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is associated with a low rate of cardiac events. The HER2-enriched subtype is associated with a high rate of pCR.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01669239, Registered 20 August 2012.

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • PAM50
  • HER2
  • intrinsic subtypes
  • cardiac safety
  • HER2-enriched
  • neoadjuvant

Background

Trastuzumab in combination with pertuzumab and chemotherapy improves survival in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (BC) [1, 2]. In locally advanced HER2-positive BC, the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) increases pathological complete response (pCR) rates [35]. Moreover, dual HER2 blockage in combination with chemotherapy has been recently explored in the adjuvant setting of early-stage BC in the APHINITY trial [6]. The addition of 1 year of adjuvant pertuzumab to standard chemotherapy plus trastuzumab led to a 19% relative risk reduction in invasive disease-free survival [6]. Based on this data, dual HER2 blockade in combination with chemotherapy is the standard of care in first-line advanced disease and will become more widely used in early BC.

In this context, cardiac dysfunction induced by anti-HER2-based chemotherapy needs attention [7]. In the pivotal first-line metastatic trial that led to the approval of trastuzumab, a New York Heart Association class III–IV cardiac toxicity of 13% and 27% was observed with trastuzumab in combination with paclitaxel or doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide, respectively [8]. According to this data, concomitant administration of trastuzumab and anthracyclines is not recommended. However, recent data suggests that the combination of trastuzumab with anthracyclines might be safe. The use of liposomal anthracyclines, such as pegylated [9] or non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD) [10], have shown equal efficacy in phase III trials compared to conventional anthracyclines in metastatic BC patients. Their formulation offers the advantages of lower specific toxicities and, possibly, an increase in efficacy [1116]. The data regarding cardiotoxicity were particularly encouraging, with a lower incidence of asymptomatic and symptomatic cardiac toxicity. In 2010, a systematic review on the cardiotoxicity of different anthracycline compounds confirmed that liposomal anthracyclines reduced the overall risk of cardiotoxicity (relative risk 0.38; p < 0.001) and the risk of clinical heart failure (relative risk 0.20; p = 0.02) [17]. Furthermore, concomitant administration of neoadjuvant trastuzumab with a conventional anthracycline [18] or trastuzumab/pertuzumab with an anthracycline/taxane combination [4] in early BC was found to be associated with a reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in 4.6% and 5.6% of patients, respectively.

Thus far, no studies have assessed the combination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab with liposomal anthracyclines, and therefore further elucidation of the cardiac safety of dual HER2 blockade in combination with liposomal anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy is required. In the Opti-HER HEART trial, we evaluated the cardiac safety and activity following six cycles of trastuzumab and pertuzumab, paclitaxel, and NPLD.

Methods

Study design and participants

The Opti-HER HEART trial is an open-label, multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm phase 2 study. Female patients aged between 18 and 74 years with histologically confirmed stage II–IIIB HER2-positive BC eligible for definitive surgery and adequate organic and cardiac function (LVEF ≥ 55%) were enrolled. HER2-positive was defined by the ASCO/CAP 2013 Guidelines and confirmed according to local assessment [19]. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are provided in Additional file 1.

Due to the lack of phase 1 data on the proposed regimen, the trial included a safety run-in consisting of a stage of intensified cardiac and hematological safety monitoring for the first 10 patients [20]. This safety monitoring involved clinical evaluation, an electrocardiogram, weekly hematological evaluation, and LVEF assessment before each cycle of study medication and every three months during the adjuvant period, until completion of 12 months from the day of the first administered study drug. LVEF assessment was determined by echocardiogram or multiple-gated acquisition scan, using the same technique in each patient across all the trial assessments. The pre-planned safety interim analysis was evaluated by an independent data monitoring committee (sponsor representatives, investigators, plus an independent cardiology expert), which deemed the trial safe and supported its continuation to full recruitment. However, primary G-CSF prophylaxis was recommended for the following 73 patients included in the trial.

All patients provided written informed consent, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committees from all participating institutions and Spanish Health Authorities. The study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice principles, the Declaration of Helsinki, and all local regulations.

Procedures

Patients received six 21-day cycles of NPLD (50 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on day 1), paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 8, and 15), trastuzumab (4 mg/kg i.v. cycle 1 on day 1, followed by 2 mg/kg i.v. weekly), and pertuzumab (840 mg i.v. fixed-dose cycle 1 on day 1, followed by 420 mg fixed-dose cycle 2 on day 1 to cycle 6 on day 1) as NAC followed by surgery. Patients who completed study treatment or experienced intolerable toxicity underwent surgery according to local practices. Asymptomatic LVEF reductions were managed according to a protocol-specified cardiac toxicity algorithm (Additional file 2: Figure S1). After surgery, adjuvant treatment was administered as per investigator preference, with a recommendation to complete a total of 1 year of trastuzumab treatment.

Outcomes

The primary objective was cardiac safety of neoadjuvant treatment assessed by incidence of New York Heart Association class III and IV heart failure (type A cardiac events) [21] and LVEF reduction [21] (10 percentage-points from baseline and to a value of < 50% or any absolute decrease in LVEF ≥ 20%) by echocardiography or multiple-gated acquisition scan (type B cardiac events). LVEF assessments were conducted at screening/baseline, within 2 days before day 1 of cycles 3 and 5 during the neoadjuvant period, within 9 days before surgery, and then every 3 months during the adjuvant treatment period, for a total of 12 months.

Secondary objectives included the assessment of activity, and the overall cardiac and non-cardiac safety and tolerability profile of the regimen up to 1 year after inclusion in the study. Safety was assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Activity was based on pCR rate in the breast and lymph nodes (ypT0/is ypN0), overall response rate by imaging per RECISTv1.1 criteria, and breast conservation rate.

Gene expression

A section of the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tissue was examined with hematoxylin and eosin staining to confirm the presence of invasive tumor cells and to determine the minimum tumor surface area. Surgical samples without invasive tumor cells were also profiled. At least two 10 μm formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded slides were used to purify total RNA using the High Pure FFPET RNA isolation kit (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Macrodissection was performed in baseline and surgical samples (when needed) to avoid contamination with normal breast tissue [22]. A minimum of ~100 ng of total RNA was used to measure the expression of 55 BC-related genes using the nCounter platform (Nanostring Technologies, Seattle, WA, USA), including the 50 genes of the PAM50 subtype predictor, androgen receptor, and four immune genes (CD4, CD8, PD1 and PDL1). Data was normalized using five housekeeping genes, and log2 transformed. Intrinsic molecular subtypes were identified using the research-based PAM50 predictor as previously described [23].

Statistical analysis

Eighty-three patients were required to reject, with 80% confidence, the null hypothesis that the addition of NPLD to a neoadjuvant regimen containing paclitaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab does not increase the incidence of cardiac events above the historical control [10, 2428] of 18% (consisting of 3% symptomatic and 15% asymptomatic events), at the 0.05 level of significance. The intention-to-treat population included all enrolled patients. The safety population is the subset of patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and have at least one safety assessment. Analysis of the primary safety outcome included the safety and intention-to-treat population.

The association between two variables was evaluated using Student’s t test, Pearson’s χ2 test, or Fisher’s exact test. Odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided and considered significant when p ≤ 0.05. To identify genes differentially expressed between paired baseline and surgical samples, a paired two-class significance analysis of microarrays was used with a false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 1%. All statistical analyses were performed using the R v3.2.3 software.

Results

Clinicopathological characteristics

From June 2013 to January 2015, 83 patients with stage II–IIIB HER2-positive BC and adequate cardiac function were enrolled in 18 sites in Spain (Fig. 1). Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The mean age of patients was 49.5 (standard deviation, 10.9) years, with the most frequent age group (n = 45; 54.2%) being 45–64 years of age. The mean body mass index was 26.4 kg/m2 (standard deviation, 5.9) and 21.7% were active smokers; 9.6% (n = 8) of patients were under treatment for arterial hypertension, 4.8% (n = 4) for diabetes mellitus, and 9.6% (n = 8) for dyslipidemia. Most patients were pre-menopausal (n = 54; 65.1%) and had hormone receptor (HR)-positive disease (n = 57; 68.7%), clinically node-positive disease (n = 39; 46.9%), or T2 tumors (n = 70; 84.3%); stage III disease occurred in 21.7% (n = 18) of patients.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

CONSORT diagram

Table 1

Patient demographics at baseline

 

n

%

83

Age, median and range

49 (22–78)

Tumor size, median (mm) and range

30 (20–80)

Clinical nodal status

 N0

40

48.2

 N1

30

36.1

 N2

8

9.6

 N3

1

1.2

 Nx

4

4.9

Hormone receptor status

 Negative

26

31.3

 Positive

57

68.7

Menopausal status

 Pre-menopausal

54

65.1

 Post-menopausal

29

34.9

Tumor stage

 II

65

78.3

 III

18

21.7

Histologic grade

 1

5

6.0

 2

28

33.7

 3

32

38.6

 Unknown

18

21.7

Treatment safety

Overall, 78 (93.9%) patients underwent surgery (Fig. 1), of whom 72 (86.7%) completed six cycles of treatment, and six patients stopped treatment before completion of the six cycles due to toxicity. Overall, five patients discontinued treatment, one (1.2%) due to objective disease progression, one (1.2%) following the first cycle due to a paclitaxel-associated hypersensitivity reaction, and one (1.2%) died after the first cycle due to acute respiratory failure at home; no necropsy was performed.

The mean LVEF at baseline was 66% (range 57–88%). For 27.7% (n = 23) of patients at least one LVEF assessment was missing or not performed within the protocol-specified interval. In 79.5% (n = 67) of patients, the final treatment value (the last available LVEF value up to the end of the study treatment period) was almost unchanged compared with baseline (no change, or increase or decrease from baseline by ten percentage points).

The study met its primary endpoint with an incidence of cardiac events during NAC of 2.4% (95% CI 0.2–8.4%). All cardiac events were type B and occurred in two patients, with an absolute decrease in LVEF up to 45% and 38% (Fig. 2); 1 patient with a type B cardiac event was able to receive standard adjuvant trastuzumab after surgery and the second was lost to follow-up after consent withdrawal. During adjuvant treatment with trastuzumab, 4 further patients (5.1%, 95% CI 1.4–12.6) presented a type B cardiac event; the LVEF value recovered to ≥ 50% in 100% of those patients.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) changes during neoadjuvant treatment and adjuvant period: from global population in red and from each of six patients who had > 10% drop in LVEF during the study period

The most frequent grade 3–4 adverse event during NAC was neutropenia (n = 28, 34%), which was less frequent in patients receiving G-CSF prophylaxis (25% vs. 67%) and was complicated with febrile neutropenia in five patients (6.0%). Other common adverse events were asthenia (n = 11; 13.3%), mucositis (n = 8; 9.6%), and diarrhea (n = 6; 7.2%). The most common of adverse events are presented in Table 2.
Table 2

Most common adverse events

 

Grade 1–2

Grade 3

Grade 4

n

%

n

%

n

%

Hematologic

 Neutropenia

10

12.0

19

22.9

9

10.8

 Anemia

24

28.9

4

4.8

0

0.0

 Thrombocytopenia

1

1.2

0

0.0

0

0.0

 Febrile neutropenia

0

0.0

4

4.8

1

1.2

Non-hematologic

 Increased ALT concentration

1

1.2

0

0.0

0

0.0

 Increased AST concentration

1

1.2

0

0.0

0

0.0

 Asthenia/Fatigue

61

73.5

11

13.3

0

0.0

 Nausea

46

55.4

4

4.8

0

0.0

 Diarrhea

63

75.9

6

7.2

0

0.0

 Vomiting

28

33.8

1

1.2

0

0.0

 Mucositis

44

53.0

8

9.6

0

0.0

 Peripheral edema

2

2.4

0

0.0

0

0.0

 Peripheral sensory neuropathy

15

18.1

5

6.0

0

0.0

 Dry skin

11

13.2

0

0.0

0

0.0

 Left ventricular dysfunction

2

2.4

1

1.2

0

0.0

Treatment activity

Forty-seven (56.6%; 95% CI 45.3–67.5%) patients achieved a pCR in the breast and axilla. Patients with HR-negative disease had a significantly higher overall pCR rate than patients with HR-positive disease (76.9% vs. 47.3%, OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2–8.7). No other clinicopathological variable (i.e., age, tumor size, menopausal status, nodal status, or histological grade) was associated with pCR. The overall response rate was 91.3% (n = 74 of 81 evaluable patients). Only one patient had disease progression on study treatment and underwent a different therapy. Mastectomy was planned in 35 patients before NAC; of these, 4 (11.4%) patients were able to receive breast conserving surgery after NAC.

Intrinsic subtype identification at baseline

A total of 58 (69.8%) baseline tumors were profiled for gene expression. No statistically significant differences were observed between baseline characteristics of this subset of samples and the overall study cohort (Additional file 3: Table S1). The majority of tumor samples (n = 30; 52.0%) were identified as HER2-enriched (Fig. 3a), followed by basal-like (n = 7; 12.07%), luminal A (n = 6; 10.3%), and luminal B (n = 6; 10.3%). As expected, the intrinsic subtype differed between HR-positive (Fig. 3b) and HR-negative (Fig. 3c) disease (p = 0.021). Of note, no luminal tumor was identified in HR-negative disease, and only 1 basal-like sample was identified in HR-positive disease. Interestingly, the HER2-enriched subtype was identified in 52.5% (n = 21) and 50% (n = 9) of HR-positive and HR-negative disease, respectively.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Molecular heterogeneity of HER2-positive breast cancer. Intrinsic subtype distribution in baseline tumors (a), according to hormonal receptor status (b, c), and in surgical tumors (d). e Pathological complete response (pCR) rates of the intrinsic subtypes identified at baseline

Intrinsic subtype identification at surgery

A total of 60 (76.9%) surgical specimens were profiled regardless of the type of pathological response (Fig. 3d). The vast majority of samples (n = 46; 76.6%) were classified as normal-like, followed by luminal A (n = 12; 20%), luminal B (n = 1; 1.7%), and HER2-enriched (n = 1; 1.7%). As expected, the normal-like subtype was identified in a higher proportion of samples achieving a pCR (89.3%) compared to samples with residual disease (30.7%; p < 0.001) (Additional file 4: Figure S2). Five cases (12.2%) that achieved a pCR were identified as luminal A (n = 4) and HER2-enriched (n = 1).

Treatment activity based on baseline intrinsic subtype

Rates of pCR varied significantly according to intrinsic subtype (p < 0.001) determined at baseline. The highest rate of pCR was observed in the basal-like subtype (85.7%), followed by HER2-enriched (83.3%), normal-like (44.4%), luminal A (33.3%), and luminal B (16.6%). HER2-enriched tumors were found to be associated with higher pCR rates compared with non-HER2-enriched tumors (83.3% vs. 46.5%; OR 5.7, 95% CI 1.7–19.4, p = 0.004), even after adjusting for HR status, tumor size, age, and nodal status (OR 13.5, 95% CI 2.5–72.5, p = 0.002). Within HR-positive disease, the pCR rates of HER2-enriched and non-HER2-enriched tumors were 76.1% and 31.5%, respectively.

Treatment activity based on baseline single gene expression

We evaluated the association between the expression (as a continuous variable) of each gene measured at baseline and pCR (Additional file 5: Figure S3). The expression of 8 and 6 genes was found significantly associated with pCR and residual disease, respectively (FDR ≤ 1%). Among them, amplicon 17q12-21 genes, such as ERBB2 and GRB7, and immune genes related to CD8 T-cell infiltration, such as CD8A and PD1, were associated with a higher likelihood of achieving a pCR. On the contrary, luminal-related genes, such as ESR1, PGR, NAT1, and BCL2, were associated with residual disease at surgery.

Additionally, we assessed the association of each individual gene with pCR after adjusting for clinicopathological parameters such as HR status, tumor size, age, and nodal status. Eight of the 14 genes (57.1%) remained significantly associated with pCR (Additional file 5: Figure S3). A similar analysis was performed after adjusting for the previous clinicopathological variables and intrinsic subtype (HER2-enriched vs. non-HER2-enriched). Only CD8A remained significantly associated with pCR.

Single gene expression changes between baseline and surgery

To identify genes whose expression changed between baseline and surgical specimens, we performed a paired two-class significance analysis of microarrays. A total of 49 of the 55 genes (89.1%) were found to change their expression between the two time-points (FDR ≤ 1%; Additional file 6: Table S2). Compared to baseline samples, 36 and 13 genes were found to be under- and overexpressed in surgical specimens, respectively. For example, there was an increase in the expression of both hormone receptors (i.e., ESR1 and PGR) and CD8A, and a decrease in the expression of ERBB2 and proliferation-related genes (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Six differentially expressed genes between baseline and surgical specimens. a ESR1, b PGR, c ERBB2, d CD8A, e MKI67, f CCNB1

Finally, we repeated the same analysis focusing on 19 surgical samples with residual disease (i.e., after excluding the samples that achieved a pCR). A total of 22 genes were found to have a significant change in expression. Compared to baseline samples, 2 genes (i.e., EGFR and SFRP1) were more expressed in residual tumors, and 20 genes were less expressed, including ERBB2 and MKI67.

Discussion

Results from the Opti-HER HEART trial suggest that a regimen that includes the most active drugs for HER2-positive disease (trastuzumab, pertuzumab, paclitaxel, and anthracycline) is effective and is associated with a low rate of cardiac events. Among 83 patients recruited, no episode of symptomatic heart failure was observed, and only 2.4% experienced an asymptomatic cardiac event during NAC. Our results confirm that a dual blockade in combination with anthracycline and taxanes is associated with a low incidence of asymptomatic LVEF decline or symptomatic heart failure [29].

Recently, four further studies have assessed the concurrent administration of trastuzumab and pertuzumab with anthracyclines. In arm A of the phase 2 TRYPHAENA trial, 75 patients received six cycles of trastuzumab and pertuzumab in combination with 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) followed by docetaxel [4]. Four (5.6%) patients experienced a reduction in LVEF of ≥ 10 percentage points from baseline to < 50%, and no patient experienced symptomatic cardiac toxicity. During post-treatment follow-up, 2 out of 72 (2.8%) patients had left ventricular systolic dysfunction of any grade; 8 (11.1%) patients experienced a LVEF reduction of 10% from baseline to < 50% [30]. In the HER2-positive cohort from the GeparSepto trial [31], 396 patients received four cycles of weekly paclitaxel (either solvent-based or nab-paclitaxel, according to randomization) followed by four cycles of epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide, with concurrent trastuzumab and pertuzumab. A LVEF reduction from baseline occurred in 7.6% of patients, with 2.0% of patients showing a reduction to < 50%, representing a ≥ 10% reduction from baseline. Foldi et al. [32] treated 50 patients with weekly paclitaxel followed by FEC in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Overall, 14 of 50 patients experienced a ≥ 10% reduction in LVEF during the treatment and 48-week cardiac monitoring period. Only one patient had an LVEF reduction to below the limit of 50% [33]. In arm B of the TRAIN-2 study [32], 219 patients were randomized to receive three cycles of FEC followed by six cycles paclitaxel and carboplatin in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab concurrent with all chemotherapy cycles. The overall incidence of clinically significant decline in LVEF (10 percentage points from baseline to an absolute value below 50%) was 5%.

Regarding non-cardiac toxicities, the combination was well tolerated; nevertheless, G-CSF administration should be strongly considered due to high rates of grade 3–4 neutropenia without this supportive treatment. Other adverse effects were manageable and are concordant with those reported in the TRYPHAENA [4] and BERENICE trials [34].

The pCR rate of 56.6% obtained in our study is similar to those observed in the TRYPHAENA [4] (56.2% in arm A), BERENICE (61.8% in cohort A) [34], and KRISTINE [35] trials (56.0% in the TCH+P arm). Interestingly, no difference in pCR rates was observed across these studies despite the different proportions of HR-positive versus HR-negative disease. The proportion of HR-positive disease was higher in our study (68.7%) than in the KRISTINE (62%), BERENICE (64.3% in Cohort A), and TRYPHAENA (53.4% in Arm A) trials. The pCR rates according to HR status were also similar across the four studies. In HR-negative disease, the pCR rates were 76.9%, 79.4% (pCR in the breast-only group), 81.5%, and 72.4% in the Opti-HER HEART, TRYPHAENA, BERENICE, and KRISTINE trials, respectively. The pCR rates in HR-positive disease were 47.3%, 46.2% (pCR in the breast-only group), 51.6%, and 44.0% in the Opti-HER HEART, TRYPHAENA, BERENICE, and KRISTINE trials, respectively.

To contextualize the activity results of the Opti-HER HEART trial, we have reviewed the literature and combined the results of 16 neoadjuvant HER2-positive trials incudling a total of 2923 patients [4, 23, 34, 3644] (Additional file 6: Table S2). Treatment activity was based on the type of chemotherapy (no chemotherapy, taxane only, or anthracycline/taxane based) and of anti-HER2 treatment (trastuzumab only or dual HER2 blockade). The pCR rates achieved with dual HER2 blockade in the absence of chemotherapy (29.3%; 95% CI 23.4–35.9) in an unselected population were comparable to the pCR rates achieved with a 12-week treatment of a taxane (either docetaxel or paclitaxel) in combination with trastuzumab (34.6%; 95% CI 29.7–39.6) (Fig. 5). The pCR rate achieved with anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy in combination with trastuzumab (40.9%; 95% CI 38.4–43.4) was higher than the pCR rate following dual HER2 blockade without chemotherapy (29.3%). Moreover, treatment with a taxane alone in combination with dual HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and lapatinib or pertuzumab obtained higher pCR rates compared to anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy in combination with trastuzumab (51.2% vs. 40.9%). Finally, anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy in combination with dual HER2 blockade led to higher pCR rates compared to taxane-only in combination with dual HER2 blockade (63.5% vs. 51.2%). These results, together with those from pivotal adjuvant trial [6], suggest that multi-agent chemotherapy and dual HER2 blockade should be considered the standard of care for most patients with early-stage HER2-positive disease, although strategies to de-escalate treatment in HER2-positive disease, such as paclitaxel in combination with trastuzumab, might be considered for most patients with small node-negative disease [45, 46].
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Rates of pathological complete response (pCR) according to the type of chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy using data from 15 neoadjuvant clinical trials in HER2-positive breast cancer. Bars denote 95% CIs. T taxane, L lapatinib, H herceptin (trastuzumab), A/T anthracycline/taxane based

Our study further supports that HER2-positive disease is biologically heterogeneous and that this heterogeneity is not completely captured by HR status [23, 4750]. Among the different intrinsic molecular subtypes of BC, the HER2-enriched was the most prevalent, being significantly associated with higher pCR rates compared to non-HER2-enriched (83.3% vs. 46.4%). Of note, the pCR rate of the HER2-enriched subtype in our study is similar to that obtained with paclitaxel, trastuzumab, and lapatinib in CALGB40601 (83.3% vs. 80.0%) [43], and higher than the pCR rate obtained with lapatinib and trastuzumab without chemotherapy in the SOLTI-PAMELA trial (83.3% vs. 40.6%) [23]. These data suggest that, in the presence of dual HER2 blockade, the HER2-enriched subtype is still chemo-sensitive but might not benefit from additional chemotherapy beyond just a single taxane. Further studies are needed to define the clinical utility of the intrinsic subtypes within HER2-positive disease.

In the last few years, most studies have focused on the intrinsic subtypes of primary untreated HER2-positive tumors [23, 4851]. However, less is known regarding the subtype distribution in residual tumor samples treated with chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy. Similarly to the CALGB40601 study [43], most residual specimens were classified as luminal A or normal-like. Although the normal-like subtype has been associated with lower tumor cellularity at surgery, the presence of luminal A tumors fits with the observed increased expression of ESR1 and PGR, and decreased expression of proliferation-related genes like CCNB1 and MKI67. Whether this is due to changes in the biology of tumor cells at baseline or to selection of clones by NAC cannot be addressed herein and remains unknown. In addition, it is unclear why five cases that achieved a pCR were identified as non-normal subtypes.

Two interesting findings regarding immune gene expression were identified in our study. First, we observed an association between the mRNA expression levels of CD8A and PD1 measured at baseline and the likelihood of achieving a pCR. CD8A provided additional information beyond intrinsic subtype in a multivariable model. This is concordant with findings obtained in tumor samples from the CALGB40601 [43], ACOSOG Z1041 [52], and CHER-LOBb [53] studies using different immune-related gene expression signatures. These data suggest that integration of intrinsic subtype with immune gene expression, or tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [54, 55], might better predict the probability of achieving a pCR. Second, we observed that immune genes, such as CD8A and PD1, were significantly upregulated in surgical specimens compared to baseline samples, indicating that immune activation is a dynamic phenomenon during treatment.

A limitation of our trial is that long-term cardiac safety was not evaluated and no survival outcome data is available. Furthermore, given the relatively small sample size, the number of observed events results in a lack of precision of the estimated rate, exacerbated by the fact that patients had a low probability of cardiac events due to their mean age and lack of risk factors.

Moreover, the genomic correlative analyses were exploratory and did not include all specimens of the study (69.9% baseline and 76.9% surgical specimens). Additionally, a rather small number of genes was evaluated. Therefore, we were limited regarding the ability to derive new gene signatures and identify new biological processes associated with treatment response. To overcome this issue, we are currently performing RNA-seq analysis in all samples obtained from this study.

Conclusions

The combination of trastuzumab, pertuzumab, paclitaxel, and NPLD is associated with a low rate of cardiac events. Among the different molecular subtypes of HER2-positive disease, the HER2-enriched is associated with a very high rate of pCR (~80%). Exploiting the biology of post-treatment samples warrants further investigation.

Abbreviations

BC: 

breast cancer

CI: 

confidence interval

HR: 

hormone receptors

i.v.: 

intravenously

FDR: 

false discovery rate

FEC: 

fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide

LVEF: 

left ventricular ejection fraction

NAC: 

neoadjuvant chemotherapy

NPLD: 

non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin

OR: 

odds ratio

pCR: 

pathological complete response

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank all the patients and family members for participating in the study.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from TEVA. Trastuzumab and pertuzumab were kindly provided by Roche and non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin by TEVA. This study was funded, in part, by an unrestricted grant from Roche, Pas a Pas, Save the Mama, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) through the Plan Estatal de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnica y de Innovacion 2013-2016 (PI16/00904) (AP). TEVA and Roche had no role in the management of this trial. The decisions and responsibilities of this trial were all under the sponsor: SOLTI Group.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

JG, MO, AL-C, and APr were responsible for trial conception and design. MO, JP, IC, EC, MM, JAV, IR, RA, APe, JM, SM, and JCQ collected the data. XG, JC, TP, LP, MM-A, and DM assembled the data. APr, TP, LP, MM-A, and DM took part in correlative science studies. TP, LP, DM, and APr analyzed the data. XG, TP, Apr, and JC drafted the report. All authors critically reviewed drafts of the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hospital Vall d’Hebron (Barcelona) AC/R(AG)143/2012(3455). All patients provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Advisory role of AP for Nanostring Technologies. Advisory Role of JG for Roche. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
(2)
Vall d’ Hebron University Hospital/Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
(3)
August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
(4)
Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
(5)
SOLTI Breast Cancer Research Group, Barcelona, Spain
(6)
Instituto Oncológico Baselga, Hospital Quirón, Barcelona, Spain
(7)
Institut Oncològic Rosell, Hospital General Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
(8)
Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Madrid, Spain
(9)
Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
(10)
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
(11)
Hospital Universitario Sant Joan De Reus, Reus, Spain
(12)
Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
(13)
Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma, Spain
(14)
Hospital Universitario Virgen Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
(15)
Hospital Universitari Arnau Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
(16)
Hospital Sagrado Corazón, Barcelona, Spain
(17)
Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain

References

  1. Swain SM, Baselga J, Kim SB, Ro J, Semiglazov V, Campone M, Ciruelos E, Ferrero JM, Schneeweiss A, Heeson S, et al. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(8):724–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Baselga J, Cortes J, Kim SB, Im SA, Hegg R, Im YH, Roman L, Pedrini JL, Pienkowski T, Knott A, et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(2):109–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Amiri-Kordestani L, Wedam S, Zhang L, Tang S, Tilley A, Ibrahim A, Justice R, Pazdur R, Cortazar P. First FDA approval of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: pertuzumab for the treatment of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(21):5359–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Schneeweiss A, Chia S, Hickish T, Harvey V, Eniu A, Hegg R, Tausch C, Seo JH, Tsai YF, Ratnayake J, et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in combination with standard neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free chemotherapy regimens in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a randomized phase II cardiac safety study (TRYPHAENA). Ann Oncol. 2013;24(9):2278–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, Roman L, Tseng LM, Liu MC, Lluch A, Staroslawska E. de la Haba-Rodriguez J, Im SA et al: Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(1):25–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. von Minckwitz G, Procter M, de Azambuja E, Zardavas D, Benyunes M, Viale G, Suter T, Arahmani A, Rouchet N, Clark E, et al. Adjuvant Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017.Google Scholar
  7. Seidman A, Hudis C, Pierri MK, Shak S, Paton V, Ashby M, Murphy M, Stewart SJ, Keefe D. Cardiac dysfunction in the trastuzumab clinical trials experience. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(5):1215–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, Fleming T, Eiermann W, Wolter J, Pegram M, et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(11):783–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Martin M, Sanchez-Rovira P, Munoz M, Baena-Canada JM, Mel JR, Margeli M, Ramos M, Martinez E, Garcia-Saenz JA, Casado A, et al. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients: efficacy and cardiac safety from the GEICAM/2004-05 study. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(12):2591–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Baselga J, Manikhas A, Cortes J, Llombart A, Roman L, Semiglazov VF, Byakhov M, Lokanatha D, Forenza S, Goldfarb RH, et al. Phase III trial of nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with trastuzumab and paclitaxel in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(3):592–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Vici P, Colucci G, Giotta F, Sergi D, Filippelli G, Perri P, Botti C, Vizza E, Carpino A, Pizzuti L, et al. A multicenter prospective phase II randomized trial of epirubicin/vinorelbine versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/vinorelbine as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer. A GOIM study. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2011;30:39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Vici P, Pizzuti L, Gamucci T, Sergi D, Conti F, Zampa G, Del Medico P, De Vita R, Pozzi M, Botti C, et al. Non-pegylated liposomal Doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide in sequential regimens with taxanes as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. J Cancer. 2014;5(6):398–405.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris KA, Harney E, Small EJ. Liposomal doxorubicin for the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Clin Prostate Cancer. 2002;1(1):37–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. O'Brien ME, Wigler N, Inbar M, Rosso R, Grischke E, Santoro A, Catane R, Kieback DG, Tomczak P, Ackland SP, et al. Reduced cardiotoxicity and comparable efficacy in a phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (CAELYX/Doxil) versus conventional doxorubicin for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004;15(3):440–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Chan S, Davidson N, Juozaityte E, Erdkamp F, Pluzanska A, Azarnia N, Lee LW. Phase III trial of liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide compared with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004;15(10):1527–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Sparano JA, Makhson AN, Semiglazov VF, Tjulandin SA, Balashova OI, Bondarenko IN, Bogdanova NV, Manikhas GM, Oliynychenko GP, Chatikhine VA, et al. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus docetaxel significantly improves time to progression without additive cardiotoxicity compared with docetaxel monotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer previously treated with neoadjuvant-adjuvant anthracycline therapy: results from a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(27):4522–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. van Dalen EC, Michiels EMC, Caron HN, Kremer LCM: Different anthracycline derivates for reducing cardiotoxicity in cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010(5).Google Scholar
  18. Buzdar AU, Suman VJ, Meric-Bernstam F, Leitch AM, Ellis MJ, Boughey JC, Unzeitig G, Royce M, McCall LM, Ewer MS, et al. Fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC-75) followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab versus paclitaxel plus trastuzumab followed by FEC-75 plus trastuzumab as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (Z1041): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(13):1317–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, Allred DC, Bartlett JM, Bilous M, Fitzgibbons P, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(31):3997–4013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Gavilá J, Fernández-Abad M, Pérez J, Guerrero Á, Oliveira M, Llobet-Canela M, Llombart A. P200 Neoadjuvant therapy in HER2+ breast cancer: Opti-HER Heart run-in phase safety data (SOLTI-1002). Breast. 2015;24:S93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. LEVIN R, DOLGIN M, FOX C, GORLIN R. The Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association: Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis of Diseases of the Heart and Great Vessels. LWW Handbooks. 1994;9:344.Google Scholar
  22. Prat A, Galván P, Jimenez B, Buckingham W, Jeiranian HA, Schaper C, Vidal M, Álvarez M, Díaz S, Ellis C. Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using core needle biopsy samples with the prosigna assay. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(3):560–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Llombart-Cussac A, Cortes J, Pare L, Galvan P, Bermejo B, Martinez N, Vidal M, Pernas S, Lopez R, Munoz M, et al. HER2-enriched subtype as a predictor of pathological complete response following trastuzumab and lapatinib without chemotherapy in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer (PAMELA): an open-label, single-group, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017.Google Scholar
  24. Gavila J, Guerrero A, Climent MA, Fernandez A, Gozalbo F, Carrascosa M, Camps J, Guillem V, Ruiz A. Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with concurrent liposomal-encapsulated doxorubicin, paclitaxel and trastuzumab for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer in clinical practice. Int J Clin Oncol. 2015;20(3):480–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Cortes J, Di Cosimo S, Climent MA, Cortes-Funes H, Lluch A, Gascon P, Mayordomo JI, Gil M, Benavides M, Cirera L, et al. Nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (TLC-D99), paclitaxel, and trastuzumab in HER-2-overexpressing breast cancer: a multicenter phase I/II study. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(1):307–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Buzdar AU, Ibrahim NK, Francis D, Booser DJ, Thomas ES, Theriault RL, Pusztai L, Green MC, Arun BK, Giordano SH, et al. Significantly higher pathologic complete remission rate after neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, paclitaxel, and epirubicin chemotherapy: results of a randomized trial in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(16):3676–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Buzdar AU, Valero V, Ibrahim NK, Francis D, Broglio KR, Theriault RL, Pusztai L, Green MC, Singletary SE, Hunt KK, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy with paclitaxel followed by 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy and concurrent trastuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer: an update of the initial randomized study population and data of additional patients treated with the same regimen. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(1):228–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V, Manikhas A, Lluch A, Tjulandin S, Zambetti M, Vazquez F, Byakhow M, Lichinitser M, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. Lancet. 2010;375(9712):377–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Lenihan D, Suter T, Brammer M, Neate C, Ross G, Baselga J. Pooled analysis of cardiac safety in patients with cancer treated with pertuzumab. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(3):791–800.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Schneeweiss A, Chia S, Hickish T, Harvey V, Eniu A, Waldron-Lynch M, Eng-Wong J, Kirk S, Cortes J. Long-term efficacy analysis of the randomised, phase II TRYPHAENA cardiac safety study: Evaluating pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus standard neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free chemotherapy regimens in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2018;89:27–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Loibl S, Jackisch C, Schneeweiss A, Schmatloch S, Aktas B, Denkert C, Wiebringhaus H, Kümmel S, Warm M, Paepke S. Dual HER2-blockade with pertuzumab and trastuzumab in HER2-positive early breast cancer: a subanalysis of data from the randomized phase III GeparSepto trial. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(3):497–504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Ramshorst MS, van Werkhoven E, Mandjes IA, Kemper I, Dezentje VO, Oving IM, Honkoop AH, Tick LW, Van de Wouw AW, Mandigers CM. A phase III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without anthracyclines in the presence of dual HER2-blockade for HER2+ breast cancer: The TRAIN-2 study (BOOG 2012-03). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2017.Google Scholar
  33. Foldi J, Mougalian S, Silber A, Lannin D, Killelea B, Chagpar A, Horowitz N, Frederick C, Rispoli L, Burrello T. Single-arm, neoadjuvant, phase II trial of pertuzumab and trastuzumab administered concomitantly with weekly paclitaxel followed by 5-fluoruracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) for stage I–III HER2-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;169(2):333–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Swain S, Ewer M, Viale G, Delaloge S, Ferrero J-M, Verrill M, Colomer R, Vieira C, Werner T, Douthwaite H. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and standard anthracycline-and taxane-based chemotherapy for the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with HER2-positive localized breast cancer (BERENICE): a phase II, open-label, multicenter, multinational cardiac safety study. Ann Oncol. 2017;29(3):646–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Hurvitz SA, Martin M, Symmans WF, Jung KH, Huang C-S, Thompson AM, Harbeck N, Valero V, Stroyakovskiy D, Wildiers H. Pathologic complete response (pCR) rates after neoadjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1 [K])+ pertuzumab (P) vs docetaxel+ carboplatin+ trastuzumab+ P (TCHP) treatment in patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) early breast cancer (EBC)(KRISTINE). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2016.Google Scholar
  36. Baselga J, Bradbury I, Eidtmann H, Di Cosimo S, de Azambuja E, Aura C, Gómez H, Dinh P, Fauria K, Van Dooren V, et al. Lapatinib with trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (NeoALTTO): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. The Lancet. 2012;379(9816):633–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Guarneri V, Frassoldati A, Bottini A, Cagossi K, Bisagni G, Sarti S, Ravaioli A, Cavanna L, Giardina G, Musolino A, et al. Preoperative Chemotherapy Plus Trastuzumab, Lapatinib, or Both in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Operable Breast Cancer: Results of the Randomized Phase II CHER-LOB Study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(16):1989–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Untch M, Loibl S, Bischoff J, Eidtmann H, Kaufmann M, Blohmer J-U, Hilfrich J, Strumberg D, Fasching PA, Kreienberg R, et al. Lapatinib versus trastuzumab in combination with neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy (GeparQuinto, GBG 44): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 13(2):135–44.Google Scholar
  39. Robidoux A, Tang G, Rastogi P, Geyer CE Jr, Azar CA, Atkins JN, Fehrenbacher L, Bear HD, Baez-Diaz L, Sarwar S, et al. Lapatinib as a component of neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive operable breast cancer (NSABP protocol B-41): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 14(12):1183–92.Google Scholar
  40. von Minckwitz G, Schneeweiss A, Loibl S, Salat C, Denkert C, Rezai M, Blohmer JU, Jackisch C, Paepke S, Gerber B, et al. Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 15(7):747–56.Google Scholar
  41. Untch M, Fasching PA, Konecny GE, Hasmüller S, Lebeau A, Kreienberg R, Camara O, Müller V, du Bois A, Kühn T et al: Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Trastuzumab Predicts Favorable Survival in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Overexpressing Breast Cancer: Results From the TECHNO Trial of the AGO and GBG Study Groups. J Clin Oncol 2011, 29(25):3351-3357.Google Scholar
  42. Untch M, Rezai M, Loibl S, Fasching PA, Huober J, Tesch H, Bauerfeind I, Hilfrich J, Eidtmann H, Gerber B, et al. Neoadjuvant Treatment With Trastuzumab in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Results From the GeparQuattro Study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(12):2024–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Carey LA, Berry DA, Cirrincione CT, Barry WT, Pitcher BN, Harris LN, Ollila DW, Krop IE, Henry NL, Weckstein DJ, et al. Molecular Heterogeneity and Response to Neoadjuvant Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Targeting in CALGB 40601, a Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel Plus Trastuzumab With or Without Lapatinib. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(6):542–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Fumagalli D, Venet D, Ignatiadis M, Azim HA, Maetens M, Rothé F, Salgado R, Bradbury I, Pusztai L, Harbeck N. RNA sequencing to predict response to neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy: a secondary analysis of the NeoALTTO randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(2):227–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Tolaney SM, Barry WT, Guo H, Dillon D, Dang CT, Yardley DA, Moy B, Marcom PK, Albain KS, Rugo HS. Seven-year (yr) follow-up of adjuvant paclitaxel (T) and trastuzumab (H)(APT trial) for node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer (BC). In: American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2017.Google Scholar
  46. Veeraraghavan J, De Angelis C, Reis-Filho JS, Pascual T, Prat A, Rimawi MF, Osborne CK, Schiff R. De-escalation of treatment in HER2-positive breast cancer: Determinants of response and mechanisms of resistance. Breast. 2017.Google Scholar
  47. Prat A, Perou CM. Deconstructing the molecular portraits of breast cancer. Mol Oncol. 2011;5(1):5–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Prat A, Bianchini G, Thomas M, Belousov A, Cheang MC, Koehler A, Gomez P, Semiglazov V, Eiermann W, Tjulandin S, et al. Research-based PAM50 subtype predictor identifies higher responses and improved survival outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer in the NOAH study. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(2):511–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Prat A, Pineda E, Adamo B, Galvan P, Fernandez A, Gaba L, Diez M, Viladot M, Arance A, Munoz M. Clinical implications of the intrinsic molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Breast. 2015;24(Suppl 2):S26–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Prat A, Carey LA, Adamo B, Vidal M, Tabernero J, Cortés J, Parker JS, Perou CM, Baselga J. Molecular features and survival outcomes of the intrinsic subtypes within HER2-positive breast cancer. JNCI. 2014;106(8).Google Scholar
  51. Prat A, Fan C, Fernandez A, Hoadley KA, Martinello R, Vidal M, Viladot M, Pineda E, Arance A, Munoz M, et al. Response and survival of breast cancer intrinsic subtypes following multi-agent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BMC Med. 2015;13:303.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Lesurf R, Griffith OL, Griffith M, Hundal J, Trani L, Watson MA, Aft R, Ellis MJ, Ota D, Suman VJ, et al. Genomic characterization of HER2-positive breast cancer and response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy-results from the ACOSOG Z1041 (Alliance) trial. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(5):1070–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Dieci MV, Prat A, Tagliafico E, Pare L, Ficarra G, Bisagni G, Piacentini F, Generali DG, Conte P, Guarneri V. Integrated evaluation of PAM50 subtypes and immune modulation of pCR in HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and HER2-targeted agents in the CherLOB trial. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(10):1867–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Prat A, Navarro A, Pare L, Reguart N, Galvan P, Pascual T, Martinez A, Nuciforo P, Comerma L, Alos L, et al. Immune-Related Gene Expression Profiling After PD-1 Blockade in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, and Melanoma. Cancer Res. 2017;77(13):3540–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Danaher P, Warren S, Dennis L, D'Amico L, White A, Disis ML, Geller MA, Odunsi K, Beechem J, Fling SP. Gene expression markers of Tumor Infiltrating Leukocytes. J Immunother Cancer. 2017;5:18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement