Skip to main content

Sugar intake and all-cause mortality—differences between sugar-sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and pure fruit juices

The Original Article was published on 24 April 2020


In 2015, the World Health Organization (WHO) published the guideline “Sugars intake for adults and children” [1]. In this guideline, the WHO recommends a daily free sugar intake of less than 10% of total energy intake in both adults and children in order to reduce noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), with a particular focus on the prevention and control of unhealthy weight gain and dental caries. Free sugars refer both to added sugars and sugars naturally present in, for example, pure fruit juice, but not to sugars in intact fruits. Based on this guideline, a few countries consider pure fruit juice (without any added ingredients) nutritionally similar to sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), such as sodas with added sugars, in their dietary guidelines. However, most countries state in their dietary guidelines that pure fruit juice can (partially) replace whole fruit [2]. Artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs), which contain no or less sugars or calories, are not included in dietary guidelines worldwide. Current scientific evidence is mainly focused on SSBs and their health effects, while studies on pure fruit juices and ASBs are more scarce and inconsistent. The conflicting dietary guidelines for pure fruit juice and the absence of dietary guidelines for ASBs emphasize the need for more research on the health effect of these types of beverages.

The UK Biobank study

The paper presented by Anderson et al. [3] studied whether SSBs, ASBs, and pure fruit juice consumption were associated with all-cause mortality in a very large prospective population-based cohort study. An important strength of this study is the distinction between SSBs, ASBs, and pure fruit juices. Many studies combine these different types of beverages and thereby mask possible differences. Moreover, specifically for fruit juice, many studies do not distinguish between pure fruit juice and sweetened fruit juice, and therefore, also no distinction can be made between added sugars and natural sugars in fruit juices. This study showed that consumption of SSBs was associated with all-cause mortality independent of total sugar intake and total energy intake, whereas pure fruit juice consumption was not associated with all-cause mortality. This finding implies different health effects for the consumption of pure fruit juice and SSBs. The fact that SSBs contain added sugars and pure fruit juice contains natural sugars could be one of the possible explanations for the different associations with all-cause mortality. Furthermore, in contrast to SSBs, pure fruit juice contains polyphenols which are associated with a lower all-cause mortality risk [4]. ASBs also initially appeared to be associated with all-cause mortality in the highest intake category (more than two ASBs per day). However, sensitivity analyses suggested reverse causation and residual confounding.


While still more research is needed on the association of both pure fruit juice and ASB consumption with all-cause mortality risk, Anderson et al. provide an important contribution to the current scientific evidence in this field by finding different associations for all-cause mortality between consumption of SSBs and consumption of pure fruit juice. Since the association between SSB consumption and all-cause mortality is well established [3, 5, 6], it is very important to include the advice to reduce the consumption of SSBs in dietary guidelines. However, there is too little evidence to assume that pure fruit juice and SSBs are nutritionally similar and have the same health effects. Nevertheless, this does also not imply that pure fruit juice should be encouraged as a substitute for SSBs, since it still contains comparable amounts of sugar. As recommended by the WHO [1], drinking water instead of SSBs to reduce sugar intake would be the best advice. However, the current state of evidence does not make it possible yet to draw up dietary guidelines for ASBs.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable



Artificially sweetened beverages


Noncommunicable diseases


Sugar-sweetened beverages


The World Health Organization


  1. WHO. Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Herforth A, Arimond M, Álvarez-Sánchez C, Coates J, Christianson K, Muehlhoff E. A global review of food-based dietary guidelines. Adv Nutr. 2019;10:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson JJ, Gray SR, Welsh P, Mackay DF, Celis-Morales CA, Lyall DM, et al. The associations of sugar-sweetened, artificially-sweetened and naturally sweet juices with all-cause mortality in 198,285 UK Biobank participants: prospective cohort study. BMC Med. 2020.

  4. Liu XM, Liu YJ, Huang Y, Yu HJ, Yuan S, Tang BW, et al. Dietary total flavonoids intake and risk of mortality from all causes and cardiovascular disease in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017;61:6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mullee A, Romaguera D, Pearson-Stuttard J, Viallon V, Stepien M, Freisling H, et al. Association between soft drink consumption and mortality in 10 European countries. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Malik VS, Li Y, Pan A, De Koning L, Schernhammer E, Willett WC, Hu FB. Long-term consumption of sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened beverages and risk of mortality in US adults. Circulation. 2019;139:18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable


Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



FRS wrote the comment. JMAB commented on earlier versions and approved the final version. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Floor R. Scheffers.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scheffers, F.R., Boer, J.M.A. Sugar intake and all-cause mortality—differences between sugar-sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and pure fruit juices. BMC Med 18, 112 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: