Skip to main content

Africa’s response to COVID-19


As the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) continues to spread, countries in sub-Saharan Africa are still experiencing outbreaks of other infectious diseases; the top causes of outbreaks from 2016 to 2018 were cholera, measles, and viral hemorrhagic diseases, such as Ebola virus disease, yellow fever, dengue fever, Lassa fever, and Rift Valley fever. These outbreaks have occurred alongside humanitarian crises and other public health emergencies in the region [1].

At the end of 2019, almost all African countries had undertaken a Joint External Evaluation (JEE) of the International Health Regulations (IHR). This process helped countries identify the gaps in their ability to prevent, detect, and respond to public health threats. Many countries had developed competencies in real-time surveillance and immunization, but overall, there was a pressing need for improving the resilience of the health sector in order to ensure effective outbreak response [2]. In response to recommendations from the JEEs, countries were supported to develop multisectoral National Action Plan for Health Security (NAPHS), addressing the gaps identified by the JEE and aligning with the various country sectoral plans.

This state of heightened alert across Africa has helped to prolong the containment phase of COVID-19 in many African countries. At the start of the pandemic in China, WHO’s African regional office and the Africa Centres for Disease Control provided guidance and technical and financial support to prepare countries. In our recent paper [3], we observed that Africa is better prepared than ever before because of our stronger national public health institutes, the rapid scale-up of testing capacity, better coordination at the continental level, and the capacity of built-in surveillance and contact tracing which has occurred since the 2013–2016 West African Ebola outbreak.

The first case of COVID-19 was reported in the African region on the 14th of February in Egypt, and in Sub-Saharan Africa on the 27th of February in Nigeria [3, 4]. This was over 1 month after the first case of the disease was reported in China, giving the region lead time to prepare for a large outbreak. As local transmission supersedes imported cases and the doubling time shortens to below 7 days in more than 95% of the affected countries [4], countries are now bracing for the impact of the pandemic.

Despite widespread misinformation about the immunity of Africans to COVID-19, overall poor health is driving mortality globally. Reports from other continents are showing higher morbidity and mortality in people of African heritage. While the observed disproportionality in adverse outcomes may be due to the impact of health disparities, poorer access to health care, and lower socioeconomic factors, the implication for African countries is clear.

At the end of April 2020, the continent has recorded a cumulative total of 20,652 cases and 861 associated deaths (case fatality ratio 4.2%) have been reported across 45 countries, the highest mortality have been recorded in Algeria 12.6% (425/3382), Liberia 9.7% (12/124), Democratic Republic of the Congo 6.1% (28/459), Mali 5.9% (23/389), Burkina Faso 6.6% (42/632), and Niger 4.2% (29/696) [3].

Leveraging on Africa’s existing resources and innovation for COVID-19 response

African countries have focused on intensive surveillance and case-finding, leveraging the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response framework (IDSR) [5], which all countries in the WHO AFRO region have adopted over the past 20 years. IDSR provides a framework for case-based and syndromic surveillance of forty conditions including influenza-like illness and severe acute respiratory illness. It provides an entry point for identifying, characterizing, and responding to community transmission of COVID-19.

The progressive scaling up of molecular testing across the continent has been impressive. Countries (such as South Africa and Nigeria) are leveraging and integrating molecular laboratory diagnostic capacity that exists for specific disease programs like drug-resistant tuberculosis, Lassa fever, and HIV, to scale-up testing for COVID-19. While access to diagnostic reagents becomes difficult, countries like Ghana are pioneering pooled testing of COVID-19 samples, therefore speeding up processing time and population coverage [6].

Public health and social measures have also been implemented across Africa. Countries have shut borders, introduced self-isolation for exposed persons, and established centers for quarantining of cases [3]. Countries and communities are on “lockdown.” As these public health measures flatten the rate of transmission, it is expected that the health system will have fewer cases of severely ill patients.

The gaps in service provision by the public health care system are being met by private hospitals accredited by government authorities to provide safe care. Access to advanced care in the public health system is limited; there are over 10 countries where there are few critical care beds, fewer experts with the training for managing critical patients with complex respiratory needs, and no ventilators [7]. Access to treatment, late presentation, and high levels of undiagnosed non-communicable diseases are likely to be the most important factors that will determine increased risk of mortality. Private health care providers are bridging the major gap that remains in the public health care sector to lead treatment facilities designated to provide care to the most critical patients.

In response to the lockdowns and the challenges of responding to the pandemic, innovative use of technology and new ways of working in health and other non-health sectors are being piloted. For instance, drones are being used to transport test kits and samples from hard-to-reach areas, thus reducing the sample transport time from many hours to minutes; there is a boom in locally manufactured face masks; an explosion of locally produced soap and hand sanitizers; and training, meetings, and workshops have moved online. Many governments have realized the need to improve hazard payments and provide insurance for staff on the frontline of the infection. African businesses have teamed up to donate in cash and kind to support country efforts, such as the $70 million donated by a coalition in Nigeria [8].

The open, frequent, and transparent communication of testing results within most African countries has kept the world abreast of the progress of the diseases despite the challenges of access to testing in many countries. The emergence of trusted voices and leadership by national public health institutes like the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control [9], the five regional Centres for Disease Control, and the apex Africa Centre for Disease Control after the West African Ebola outbreak [10] has added technical rigor and improved the quality of response by guiding political leaders to make better decisions on public health and social measures. Social influencers and celebrities have joined voices to public health experts urging people to practice social distancing.


Despite the resilience of the people and some progress in public health systems, African countries will still be stretched as the pandemic spreads across the continent and as the containment measures succumb to the pressures of time, limited resources, and increased rate of infections. In the meantime, African countries are leveraging investments in syndromic surveillance and case-finding through IDSR; scaling molecular testing capacity developed for other diseases; deploying trainees in field epidemiology training programs to lead the field response; and using her most precious resource—her young people—to undertake contact tracing, staff isolation centers and provide the supportive care that is available. The management of these resources has shown to be the best fit in national public health institutes, which have been rapidly established and strengthened in the last decade in Africa.

So far, the response in Africa has been marked by innovation and resilience in the face of almost insurmountable odds and in the resounding collapse of multilateralism. However, as always, Africa will survive.

Availability of data and materials

Not Applicable.



Coronavirus disease


Human immunodeficiency virus


Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response


International Health Regulations


Joint External Evaluation


National Action Plan for Health Security


  1. Talisuna AO, Okiro EA, Yahaya AA, Stephen M, Bonkoungou B, Musa EO, et al. Spatial and temporal distribution of infectious disease epidemics, disasters and other potential public health emergencies in the World Health Organization Africa region, 2016–2018. Glob Health. 2020;16, 9(1) Available from: [cited 2020 May 3].

  2. Talisuna A, Yahaya AA, Rajatonirina SC, Stephen M, Oke A, Mpairwe A, et al. Joint external evaluation of the International Health Regulation (2005) capacities: current status and lessons learnt in the WHO African region. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(6):e001312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization. Weekly bulletin on outbreaks and other emergencies. 2020. Available from:

    Google Scholar 

  4. Resolve to Save Lives. Global situation update. 2020. Available from: [cited 2020 May 3].

  5. Fall IS, Rajatonirina S, Yahaya AA, Zabulon Y, Nsubuga P, Nanyunja M, et al. Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) strategy: current status, challenges and perspectives for the future in Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(4):e001427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Should African countries embrace Ghana’s Covid-19 ‘pooled testing’? myjoyonline. 2020 30; Available from: [cited 2020 Mar 5].

  7. Ruth Maclean, Simon Mark. 10 African countries have no ventilators. That’s Only part of the problem. The New York Times. 2020; Available from: Accessed 3 May 2020.

  8. Coalition against COVID-19 (CACOVID). 2020. Available from: [cited 2020 Mar 5].

  9. Njidda AM, Oyebanji O, Obasanya J, Ojo O, Adedeji A, Mba N, et al. The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(2):e000712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Meda N, Dabis F, Desenclos J-C, Crespin X, Delfraissy J-F. Network for strong, national, public health institutes in west Africa. Lancet. 2016;387(10034):2196–7 Available from: [cited 2020 May 3].

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank Oyeronke Oyebanji for providing support in the development of the manuscript.


Not Applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



CI and EA conceptualized and developed the outline for this manuscript. EA developed the first draft. CI contributed to the first draft and further review. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chikwe Ihekweazu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ihekweazu, C., Agogo, E. Africa’s response to COVID-19. BMC Med 18, 151 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: