Skip to main content
Download PDF

Causal role of high body mass index in multiple chronic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization studies

BMC Medicine volume 19, Article number: 320 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Obesity is a worldwide epidemic that has been associated with a plurality of diseases in observational studies. The aim of this study was to summarize the evidence from Mendelian randomization (MR) studies of the association between body mass index (BMI) and chronic diseases.

Methods

PubMed and Embase were searched for MR studies on adult BMI in relation to major chronic diseases, including diabetes mellitus; diseases of the circulatory, respiratory, digestive, musculoskeletal, and nervous systems; and neoplasms. A meta-analysis was performed for each disease by using results from published MR studies and corresponding de novo analyses based on summary-level genetic data from the FinnGen consortium (n = 218,792 individuals).

Results

In a meta-analysis of results from published MR studies and de novo analyses of the FinnGen consortium, genetically predicted higher BMI was associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus, 14 circulatory disease outcomes, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, five digestive system diseases, three musculoskeletal system diseases, and multiple sclerosis as well as cancers of the digestive system (six cancer sites), uterus, kidney, and bladder. In contrast, genetically predicted higher adult BMI was associated with a decreased risk of Dupuytren’s disease, osteoporosis, and breast, prostate, and non-melanoma cancer, and not associated with Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or Parkinson’s disease.

Conclusions

The totality of the evidence from MR studies supports a causal role of excess adiposity in a plurality of chronic diseases. Hence, continued efforts to reduce the prevalence of overweight and obesity are a major public health goal.

Peer Review reports

Background

Obesity is a worldwide epidemic that has been associated with an increased risk of a plurality of chronic diseases in traditional observational studies [1,2,3,4,5,6]. These observational findings [1,2,3,4,5,6] may represent the causal effect of obesity on disease risk or confounding from other risk factors, such as a poor diet and physical inactivity. During the last years, an increasing number of Mendelian randomization (MR) studies of adiposity, mostly defined by body mass index (BMI), in relation to chronic diseases have been published [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. MR is an instrumental variable analysis that exploits genetic variants with a robust impact on the exposure (e.g., BMI) as proxy markers for the exposure to test whether the exposure has a causal relationship with disease risk [54]. Compared with conventional observational studies, MR studies are less susceptible to confounding as genes are randomly assorted when passed from parents to descendants [54]. Additionally, MR studies are not biased by reverse causality as genes are constant and not modified by disease development.

The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analyses of MR studies to determine the causal role of excess adiposity in chronic diseases. Meta-analyses were performed using results from published MR studies and complemented with results from de novo MR analyses of pertinent disease outcomes in the FinnGen consortium.

Methods

Literature search and inclusion criteria

A search in the PubMed and Embase databases using the query “(Mendelian randomization) AND (body mass index OR overweight OR obesity or adiposity)” was performed on October 3, 2021. Eligible for inclusion were original articles that reported estimates from an MR analysis of genetically predicted adulthood BMI in relation to one or more chronic diseases in the following disease groups: diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2); disease of the circulatory, respiratory, digestive, musculoskeletal, or nervous system; or site-specific cancer. When more than one study was published on the same outcome and study population, the study based on the largest number of cases or the largest number of genetic variants (if the sample size was the same) was included. No restriction based on the number of cases was imposed.

Data extraction and quality assessment

Data were extracted and entered in predefined tables by one author (SCL) and independently reviewed by another author (SB). From each MR study, the following information was extracted: the last name of the first author and year of publication; the number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) used as instrumental variables in the analysis, the source for the SNPs, and the exposure unit; consortium, study, or studies from which the SNP-outcome association estimates were obtained; the number of cases and non-cases or the total number of participants; ancestry of the study population; and the relative risk estimate (generally odds ratio [OR]) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the BMI-outcome association from the primary analysis. The study quality was assessed by adapting a modified version of the Strengthening the Reporting of Mendelian Randomization Studies (STROBE-MR) Guidelines [55, 56].

Statistical analysis

In most studies, the relative risk estimate was expressed per 1 standard deviation (SD; ~4.8 kg/m2) increase in genetically predicted BMI. For studies using another unit (e.g., 1 kg/m2), the estimate was rescaled to 1 SD increase in BMI. Meta-analysis was performed for each outcome using results of published MR studies and de novo MR analyses of summary-level genetic data from the R5 release of the FinnGen consortium (n = 218,792 individuals) [57]. For the de novo MR analyses of FinnGen data, independent SNPs (low linkage disequilibrium R2 < 0.001) associated with BMI at P < 5 × 10−8 in a genome-wide association meta-analysis of the Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits consortium and the UK Biobank (n = 806,810 individuals) [58] were obtained from a recent MR study [49]. All BMI-associated SNPs were harmonized with the outcome data in FinnGen to ensure that effect estimates of each SNP on BMI and the outcome corresponded to the same effect allele. Analyses of FinnGen data were performed for all relevant diseases except aortic valve stenosis and osteoarthritis which were not available in the FinnGen database. Considering potential differential associations of BMI with disease risk in populations of different origins, sensitivity analyses confined to data based on European populations were conducted. Meta-analyses of results in non-European populations were not possible due to a lack of data from more than one study on the same disease. Heterogeneity between studies was quantified using the I2 statistic [59]. Values <25%, 25–75%, and >75% were considered low, moderate, and high heterogeneity. All statistical analyses were conducted in Stata (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) using the mrrobust and metan commands.

Results

Literature search and study selection

The PubMed and Embase searches resulted in 1469 unique hits of which 116 articles reported results from an MR study of BMI in relation to one or more of the pertinent disease outcomes. An overview of study selection is presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the study selection

Full size image

Study quality and description

The results from the evaluation of study quality are provided in Additional file 1: Table S1. All studies indicated Mendelian randomization in the title and/or abstract, provided a rationale for the study and the objective, and provided information on the data sources used. In two studies, information on the number of cases and non-cases for the disease outcome(s) was not found [25, 29, 30]. Most studies obtained genetic instruments for BMI from a genome-wide association study based on the Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits consortium with or without UK Biobank [58, 60, 61] and used 14 to several hundred SNPs as instrumental variables. The remaining studies used one to few selected SNPs in relevant obesity loci (e.g., FTO). Most recent MR studies used a strict linkage disequilibrium cut-off (R2 < 0.001) to select independent SNPs as instrumental variables for BMI, but some studies selected all conditional independent SNPs identified in the genome-wide association study. The majority of MR studies were based on outcome data from one or few studies (e.g., Danish, Swedish, and Chinese cohorts), a large-scale genetic consortium, or the UK Biobank. For several outcomes, two or more studies were published based on outcome data from the same source population (e.g., same consortium or UK Biobank). One two-sample MR study did not indicate the statistical method used for the primary analysis [14], and eight studies did report results of sensitivity analyses based on robust MR methods (e.g., weighted median and MR-Egger regression) [9, 11, 17, 24, 25, 35, 40, 41].

The number of MR studies based on independent study samples for each disease category was two for diabetes mellitus [7, 8], 13 for circulatory system diseases [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21], three for respiratory diseases [8, 22, 23], six for digestive system diseases [24,25,26,27,28,29], five for musculoskeletal system diseases [30,31,32,33,34] plus FinnGen consortium (for osteoporosis), five for nervous system diseases [35,36,37,38,39], and 14 for neoplasms [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. Among the selected studies, six studies included East-Asian (Chinese [11, 25, 42] and Japanese [48, 50]) or Chilean [53] individuals, whereas the remaining studies included individuals of European ancestry or mixed (trans-ancestry) populations. Details and results of published MR studies included in the meta-analyses as well as results from de novo MR analyses of FinnGen data are provided in Additional file 1: Table S2.

Diabetes mellitus

Genetically predicted higher BMI was associated with an increased risk of type 1 diabetes mellitus in UK Biobank but not in the FinnGen consortium, with high heterogeneity between studies (Additional file 1: Table S2). On the other hand, there was a consistent association of genetically predicted adulthood BMI with type 2 diabetes, with a combined OR of 2.03 (95% CI 1.88–2.19) (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Diseases of the circulatory system

Genetically predicted higher BMI was associated with increased risk of all 14 studied diseases of the circulatory system (Fig. 2, Additional file 1: Table S2). The strongest associations were for aortic valve stenosis (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.46–2.79), followed by heart failure (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.57–1.82) and hypertension (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.59–1.78). The associations were weaker for all stroke types, with ORs ranging from 1.16 (95% CI 1.10–1.23) for ischemic stroke to 1.21 (95% CI 1.02–1.44) for intracerebral hemorrhage. Excluding the study based on a Chinese population had a minor impact on the results for peripheral artery disease (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.55–1.75). High heterogeneity between studies was only observed in the analyses of aortic valve stenosis, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension, but this was due to different magnitude of positive associations rather than a lack of association in one of the studies (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Meta-analysis results for genetically predicted BMI in relation to diseases of the circulatory system. Results are scaled per 1 SD increase of BMI. Analyses of coronary artery disease and peripheral artery disease include individuals of both European (the vast majority) and non-European ancestry; analyses of other outcomes include individuals of European ancestry only

Full size image

Diseases of the respiratory system

MR studies on diseases of the respiratory system were scarce, with results reported only for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) mortality (Additional file 1: Table S2). In a meta-analysis of available independent study samples, the OR was 1.36 (95% CI 1.29–1.43) for asthma and 1.65 (95% CI 1.47–1.85) for COPD, with no heterogeneity among studies.

Diseases of the digestive system

Genetically predicted higher BMI was associated with an increased risk of diverticular disease, gallstone disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, Crohn’s disease, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, but with a lower risk of ulcerative colitis (Fig. 3, Additional file 1: Table S2). The strongest association was for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.22–2.69). Results for gallstone disease remained essentially unchanged after removing the study based on a Chinese population (Additional file 1: Table S2). Moderate heterogeneity between studies was only observed in the analysis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Meta-analysis results for genetically predicted BMI in relation to diseases of the digestive system. Results are scaled per 1 SD increase of BMI. All analyses include individuals of European ancestry only. GERD gastroesophageal reflux disease, NA not available, NAFLD nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Full size image

Diseases of the musculoskeletal system

Published MR studies of BMI and diseases of the musculoskeletal diseases were available for Dupuytren’s disease, gout, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis (Additional file 1: Table S2). Higher genetically predicted BMI was associated with a decreased risk of Dupuytren’s disease but with an increased risk of the other three musculoskeletal diseases. The combined ORs were 0.77 (95% CI 0.69–0.87) for Dupuytren’s disease, 1.92 (95% CI 1.60–2.30) for gout, 1.55 (95% CI 1.43–1.69) for osteoarthritis, and 1.27 (95% CI 1.17–1.39) for rheumatoid arthritis. There was high heterogeneity between studies on Dupuytren’s disease and moderate heterogeneity between studies on gout and rheumatoid arthritis. MR analysis of osteoporosis in the FinnGen consortium showed an OR of 0.81 (95% CI 0.65–0.99) per 1 SD increase in genetically predicted BMI (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Diseases of the nervous system

Genetically predicted BMI was associated with multiple sclerosis (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.14–1.39) but not Alzheimer’s disease or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Additional file 1: Table S2). There was heterogeneity between estimates for Parkinson’s disease, with an inverse association of genetically predicted BMI and Parkinson’s disease found in the FinnGen consortium (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60–0.96) but not in the Parkinson’s disease genome-wide association study (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.83–1.12). The combined OR of Parkinson’s disease was 0.90 (95% CI 0.79–1.02).

Neoplasms

Meta-analysis results showed that genetically predicted BMI was associated with an increased risk of cancers of the digestive system (i.e., esophageal, stomach, colorectal, pancreatic, liver, and gallbladder/biliary tract cancer), uterus (endometrial and cervical cancer), ovary, kidney, and bladder, but with a decreased risk of breast, prostate, and non-melanoma skin cancer (Fig. 4). There was no consistent and overall association with other cancers (Fig. 3, Additional file 1: Table S2). Results remained except for ovarian cancer when confining the study populations to individuals of European ancestry, but the magnitude of the association became weaker for colorectal cancer and stronger for stomach, endometrial, and cervical cancer (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Meta-analysis results for genetically predicted BMI in relation to neoplasms. Results are scaled per 1 SD increase of BMI. Analyses include individuals of European ancestry only if not otherwise indicated (i.e., trans-ancestry). NA not available

Full size image

Discussion

This contemporary meta-analysis of MR studies of genetically predicted BMI in relation to 56 chronic diseases provides evidence in support of causal associations of excess adiposity with increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus, 14 circulatory system diseases, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, five digestive system diseases, three musculoskeletal system diseases, multiple sclerosis, and cancers of the digestive system (six cancer sites), uterus, kidney, and bladder. In contrast, MR evidence indicates that high BMI is associated with a decreased risk of breast, prostate, and non-melanoma skin cancer, Dupuytren’s disease, and osteoporosis, and not likely associated with risk of Alzheimer disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or Parkinson’s disease.

This meta-analysis of MR studies found consistent associations of higher genetically predicted BMI and increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases. However, conflicting results were found for adulthood BMI in relation to type 1 diabetes mellitus. The inconsistent results might be related to different ages at onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus in the UK Biobank and FinnGen populations or that genetic instruments for adulthood BMI rather than childhood BMI were used. An MR study of genetically predicted childhood BMI showed a positive association with childhood-onset (<17 years) type 1 diabetes mellitus (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.06–1.64 per SD score increase in BMI based on 32 SNPs) [62]. Excess adiposity may increase the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases by increasing fasting glucose, insulin, and triglyceride levels; raising blood pressure; and promoting systemic inflammation [63,64,65]. An MR study based on consortia data found that the genetic association of BMI with risk of coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, and stroke was partly mediated by systolic blood pressure and type 2 diabetes mellitus, but not materially mediated by lipids or smoking [19].

Higher genetically predicted BMI was associated with increased risk of several diseases of the respiratory, digestive, and musculoskeletal systems, including asthma, gallbladder disease, diverticular disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, gout, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis. The associations may be related to an obesity-related reduction in lung volume (for asthma), joint loading (for osteoarthritis), and alterations in microbiota composition, inflammatory mediators, and hormone levels. In contrast, higher genetically predicted BMI was associated with a modest lower risk of osteoporosis, possibly explained by mechanical stresses mediated through gravitational action. This finding confirms previous MR studies that have shown a positive association between genetically predicted BMI and bone mineral density [66, 67]. Genetically predicted BMI was also inversely associated with the risk of Dupuytren’s disease in an MR study based on data from a genome-wide association study on this outcome [30]. The mechanism behind this association is unclear but might be related to lower testosterone levels with increasing BMI [30]. For the two inflammatory bowel diseases, the direction of the association with genetically predicted BMI differed for Crohn’s disease (positive association) and ulcerative colitis (inverse association). A previous meta-analysis of observational studies found that BMI was positively associated with the risk of Crohn’s disease but unrelated to ulcerative colitis [68]. Hence, the observed inverse association between genetically predicted BMI and ulcerative colitis in the present meta-analysis of two MR studies may be a spurious finding. In fact, the inverse association was only significant in the IBD consortium but not in the FinnGen consortium.

This meta-analysis of MR studies provided evidence that excess adiposity increases the risk of multiple sclerosis but not Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or Parkinson’s disease. If anything, a suggestive inverse association was observed between genetically predicted BMI and Parkinson’s disease. This finding is consistent with the results of a previous meta-analysis that found that being underweight was associated with an increased risk of Parkinson’s disease [69].

The opposite direction of the associations of genetically predicted BMI with different cancers suggests different causal pathways for BMI and various cancers. The increased risk of cancers of the digestive system, uterus, kidney, and bladder may be mediated by alterations in insulin signaling, growth factors, adipose tissue-derived inflammation, and hormone levels. Higher genetically predicted BMI has been shown to relate to lower serum testosterone levels [70], and testosterone levels are positively associated with risk of breast, prostate, and skin cancer [71, 72]. Thus, the observed inverse associations of genetically predicted BMI with these cancers might, at least in part, be explained by lower testosterone levels in overweight and obese individuals. In premenopausal women, high BMI may lower breast cancer risk via decreased estradiol levels [73].

Heterogeneity was observed between estimates from individual studies in analyses of genetically predicted BMI and several disease outcomes (e.g., diabetes, aortic valve stenosis, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and stomach, endometrial, bladder, head and neck, and lung cancer). The detected heterogeneity was mainly caused by the different magnitude of the associations across studies and may be related to different genetic instruments used or to different study populations with different characteristics.

A strength of MR studies is that confounding and reverse causation bias are reduced as BMI is proxied by genetic variants that generally are not related to self-selected behaviors and environmental exposures and are not modified by disease development. The validity of MR findings relies on the absence of pleiotropy (i.e., where a genetic variant is associated with more than one phenotype). Researchers of most MR studies included in the meta-analysis performed sensitivity analyses and found limited evidence that the associations were biased by pleiotropy. Another limitation in MR studies of obesity and other harmful exposures in relation to late-onset diseases is competing risk bias, which is a potential type of survival bias. It cannot be ruled out that this bias might have affected the results in some of the studies. A further shortcoming is that most MR studies comprised individuals of European ancestry and therefore cannot infer causality of the role of excess adiposity in chronic diseases in non-European populations.

Conclusions

The totality of the evidence from published and de novo Mendelian randomization analyses supports a causal role of excess adiposity in a plurality of chronic diseases. Hence, continued efforts to reduce the prevalence of overweight and obesity are a major public health goal.

Availability of data and materials

All the data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its supplementary files.

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

CI :

Confidence interval

MR:

Mendelian randomization

OR :

Odds ratio

SD :

Standard deviation

SNPs:

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms

References

  1. Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, Heller RF, Zwahlen M. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet. 2008;371(9612):569–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60269-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guh DP, Zhang W, Bansback N, Amarsi Z, Birmingham CL, Anis AH. The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(1):88. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. WHO Consultation on Obesity (1999: Geneva, Switzerland) & World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic: report of a WHO consultation. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2000. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42330. Accessed 18 Aug 2021.

  4. Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, Graham I, Reiner Z, Verschuren M, Albus C, Benlian P, Boysen G, Cifkova R et al: European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J, 33(13):1635-1701.

  5. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Diet, nutrition, physical activity and cancer: a global perspective. In: The Third Expert Report: World Cancer Research Fund International; 2018. Available at http://dietandcancerreport.org/:. Accessed 18 Aug 2021.

  6. Choi EK, Park HB, Lee KH, Park JH, Eisenhut M, van der Vliet HJ, et al. Body mass index and 20 specific cancers: re-analyses of dose-response meta-analyses of observational studies. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(3):749–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx819.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yuan S, Larsson SC. An atlas on risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a wide-angled Mendelian randomisation study. Diabetologia. 2020;63(11):2359–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-020-05253-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hypponen E, Mulugeta A, Zhou A, Santhanakrishnan VK. A data-driven approach for studying the role of body mass in multiple diseases: a phenome-wide registry-based case-control study in the UK Biobank. Lancet Digit Health. 2019;1(3):e116–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30028-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nordestgaard BG, Palmer TM, Benn M, Zacho J, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Davey Smith G, et al. The effect of elevated body mass index on ischemic heart disease risk: causal estimates from a Mendelian randomisation approach. PLoS Med. 2012;9(5):e1001212. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001212.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Klovaite J, Benn M, Nordestgaard BG. Obesity as a causal risk factor for deep venous thrombosis: a Mendelian randomization study. J Intern Med. 2015;277(5):573–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12299.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang Y, Xu M, Xie L, Wang T, Huang X, Lv X, et al. Obesity and peripheral arterial disease: a Mendelian randomization analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2016;247:218–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.12.034.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chatterjee NA, Giulianini F, Geelhoed B, Lunetta KL, Misialek JR, Niemeijer MN, et al. Genetic obesity and the risk of atrial fibrillation: causal estimates from Mendelian randomization. Circulation. 2017;135(8):741–54. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024921.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van ‘t Hof FN, Vaucher J, Holmes MV, de Wilde A, Baas AF, Blankensteijn JD, et al. Genetic variants associated with type 2 diabetes and adiposity and risk of intracranial and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017;25(6):758–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lindstrom S, Germain M, Crous-Bou M, Smith EN, Morange PE, van Hylckama VA, et al. Assessing the causal relationship between obesity and venous thromboembolism through a Mendelian Randomization study. Hum Genet. 2017;136(7):897–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-017-1811-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Larsson SC, Bäck M, Rees JMB, Mason AM, Burgess S. Body mass index and body composition in relation to 14 cardiovascular conditions in UK Biobank: a Mendelian randomization study. Eur Heart J. 2019;41(2):221–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz388.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shah S, Henry A, Roselli C, Lin H, Sveinbjornsson G, Fatemifar G, et al. Genome-wide association and Mendelian randomisation analysis provide insights into the pathogenesis of heart failure. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):163. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13690-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaltoft M, Langsted A, Nordestgaard BG. Obesity as a causal risk factor for aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(2):163–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.050.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Harshfield EL, Georgakis MK, Malik R, Dichgans M, Markus HS. Modifiable lifestyle factors and risk of stroke: a Mendelian randomization analysis. Stroke. 2021;52(3):931–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031710.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gill D, Zuber V, Dawson J, Pearson-Stuttard J, Carter AR, Sanderson E, et al. Risk factors mediating the effect of body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio on cardiovascular outcomes: Mendelian randomization analysis. Int J Obes (Lond). 2021;45(7):1428–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00807-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Giontella A, Lotta LA, Overton JD, Baras A, Regeneron Genetics C, Minuz P, et al. Causal effect of adiposity measures on blood pressure traits in 2 urban Swedish cohorts: a Mendelian randomization study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(13):e020405. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020405.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Karhunen V, Bakker MK, Ruigrok YM, Gill D, Larsson SC. Modifiable Risk Factors for Intracranial Aneurysm and Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Mendelian Randomization Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(22):e022277. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022277.

  22. Sun YQ, Brumpton BM, Langhammer A, Chen Y, Kvaloy K, Mai XM. Adiposity and asthma in adults: a bidirectional Mendelian randomisation analysis of The HUNT Study. Thorax. 2020;75(3):202–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-213678.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Au Yeung SL, Li AM, Schooling CM. A life course approach to elucidate the role of adiposity in asthma risk: evidence from a Mendelian randomisation study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021;75(3):277–81. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2020-213745.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stender S, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjaerg-Hansen A. Elevated body mass index as a causal risk factor for symptomatic gallstone disease: a Mendelian randomization study. Hepatology. 2013;58(6):2133–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.26563.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pang Y, Kartsonaki C, Lv J, Millwood IY, Yu C, Guo Y, et al. Observational and genetic associations of body mass index and hepatobiliary diseases in a relatively lean Chinese population. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(10):e2018721. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18721.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Carreras-Torres R, Ibanez-Sanz G, Obon-Santacana M, Duell EJ, Moreno V. Identifying environmental risk factors for inflammatory bowel diseases: a Mendelian randomization study. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):19273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76361-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yuan S, Gill D, Giovannucci EL, Larsson SC. Obesity, type 2 diabetes, lifestyle factors, and risk of gallstone disease: a Mendelian randomization investigation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;S1542-3565(21):00001-X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.12.034 Online ahead of print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yuan S, Larsson SC. Genetically predicted adiposity, diabetes, and lifestyle factors in relation to diverticular disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;S1542-3565(21):00641–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2021.06.013 Online ahead of print.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Green HD, Beaumont RN, Wood AR, Hamilton B, Jones SE, Goodhand JR, et al. Genetic evidence that higher central adiposity causes gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a Mendelian randomization study. Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49(4):1270–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa082.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Majeed M, Wiberg A, Ng M, Holmes MV, Furniss D. The relationship between body mass index and the risk of development of Dupuytren’s disease: a Mendelian randomization study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2021;46(4):406–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193420958553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Larsson SC, Burgess S, Michaelsson K. Genetic association between adiposity and gout: a Mendelian randomization study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(12):2145–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/key229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hindy G, Akesson KE, Melander O, Aragam KG, Haas ME, Nilsson PM, et al. Cardiometabolic polygenic risk scores and osteoarthritis outcomes: a Mendelian randomization study using data from the Malmo Diet and Cancer Study and the UK Biobank. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(6):925–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40812.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Funck-Brentano T, Nethander M, Moverare-Skrtic S, Richette P, Ohlsson C. Causal factors for knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis: a Mendelian randomization study in the UK Biobank. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(10):1634–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40928.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tang B, Shi H, Alfredsson L, Klareskog L, Padyukov L, Jiang X. Obesity-related traits and the development of rheumatoid arthritis: evidence from genetic data. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021;73(2):203–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.41517.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nordestgaard LT, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG, Frikke-Schmidt R. Body mass index and risk of Alzheimer’s disease: a Mendelian randomization study of 399,536 individuals. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(7):2310–20. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-00195.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Larsson SC, Traylor M, Malik R, Dichgans M, Burgess S, Markus HS. CoStream consortium obotIGoAsP: modifiable pathways in Alzheimer’s disease: Mendelian randomisation analysis. BMJ. 2017;359:j5375. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j5375.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Zeng P, Yu X, Xu H. Association between premorbid body mass index and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: causal inference through genetic approaches. Front Neurol. 2019;10:543. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00543.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Yuan S, Xiong Y, Larsson SC. An atlas on risk factors for multiple sclerosis: a Mendelian randomization study. J Neurol. 2020;268(1):114–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10119-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Noyce AJ, Bandres-Ciga S, Kim J, Heilbron K, Kia D, Hemani G, et al. The Parkinson’s disease Mendelian randomization research portal. Mov Disord. 2019;34(12):1864–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27873.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Thrift AP, Shaheen NJ, Gammon MD, Bernstein L, Reid BJ, Onstad L, et al. Obesity and risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett’s esophagus: a Mendelian randomization study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(11). https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju252.

  41. Benn M, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Smith GD, Nordestgaard BG. High body mass index and cancer risk-a Mendelian randomisation study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31(9):879–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-016-0147-5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Mao Y, Yan C, Lu Q, Zhu M, Yu F, Wang C, et al. Genetically predicted high body mass index is associated with increased gastric cancer risk. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017;25(9):1061–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2017.103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Johansson M, Carreras-Torres R, Scelo G, Purdue MP, Mariosa D, Muller DC, et al. The influence of obesity-related factors in the etiology of renal cell carcinoma-a Mendelian randomization study. PLoS Med. 2019;16(1):e1002724. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002724.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Saunders CN, Cornish AJ, Kinnersley B, Law PJ, Claus EB, Il'yasova D, et al. Lack of association between modifiable exposures and glioma risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis. Neuro Oncol. 2020;22(2):207–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noz209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Lu Y, Gentiluomo M, Lorenzo-Bermejo J, Morelli L, Obazee O, Campa D, et al. Mendelian randomisation study of the effects of known and putative risk factors on pancreatic cancer. J Med Genet. 2020;57(12):820–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Dusingize JC, Olsen CM, An J, Pandeya N, Law MH, Thompson BS, et al. Body mass index and height and risk of cutaneous melanoma: Mendelian randomization analyses. Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49(4):1236–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Went M, Cornish AJ, Law PJ, Kinnersley B, van Duin M, Weinhold N, et al. Search for multiple myeloma risk factors using Mendelian randomization. Blood Adv. 2020;4(10):2172–9. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001502.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Masuda T, Ogawa K, Kamatani Y, Murakami Y, Kimura T, Okada Y. A Mendelian randomization study identified obesity as a causal risk factor of uterine endometrial cancer in Japanese. Cancer Sci. 2020;111(12):4646–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.14667.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Bull CJ, Bell JA, Murphy N, Sanderson E, Davey Smith G, Timpson NJ, et al. Adiposity, metabolites, and colorectal cancer risk: Mendelian randomization study. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):396. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01855-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Suzuki S, Goto A, Nakatochi M, Narita A, Yamaji T, Sawada N, et al. Body mass index and colorectal cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization study. Cancer Sci. 2021;112(4):1579–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.14824.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Vithayathil M, Carter P, Kar S, Mason AM, Burgess S, Larsson SC. Body size and composition and risk of site-specific cancers in the UK Biobank and large international consortia: a Mendelian randomisation study. PLoS Med. 2021;18(7):e1003706. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003706.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhou W, Liu G, Hung RJ, Haycock PC, Aldrich MC, Andrew AS, et al. Causal relationships between body mass index, smoking and lung cancer: univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization. Int J Cancer. 2021;148(5):1077–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33292.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Barahona Ponce C, Scherer D, Brinster R, Boekstegers F, Marcelain K, Garate-Calderon V, et al. Gallstones, body mass index, C-reactive protein, and gallbladder cancer: Mendelian randomization analysis of Chilean and European Genotype Data. Hepatology. 2021;73(5):1783–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.31537.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S. Mendelian randomization: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyg070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Smith GD, Davies NM, Egger M, Gallo V, Golub R, Higgins JP, et al. STROBE-MR: guidelines for strengthening the reporting of Mendelian randomization studies. PeerJ Preprints. 2019;7:e27857v1.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Burgess S, Davey Smith G, Davies NM, Dudbridge F, Gill D, Glymour MM, et al. Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations. Wellcome Open Res. 2019;4:186. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15555.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. FinnGen consortium. FinnGen Documentation of R5 release, 2021. Web: https://finngen.gitbook.io/documentation/ [access date 12 Aug 2021].

  58. Pulit SL, Stoneman C, Morris AP, Wood AR, Glastonbury CA, Tyrrell J, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for body fat distribution in 694 649 individuals of European ancestry. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28(1):166–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddy327.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Locke AE, Kahali B, Berndt SI, Justice AE, Pers TH, Day FR, et al. Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology. Nature. 2015;518(7538):197–206. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14177.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Yengo L, Sidorenko J, Kemper KE, Zheng Z, Wood AR, Weedon MN, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for height and body mass index in approximately 700000 individuals of European ancestry. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27(20):3641–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddy271.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Censin JC, Nowak C, Cooper N, Bergsten P, Todd JA, Fall T. Childhood adiposity and risk of type 1 diabetes: a Mendelian randomization study. PLoS Med. 2017;14(8):e1002362. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002362.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Fall T, Hagg S, Ploner A, Magi R, Fischer K, Draisma HH, et al. Age- and sex-specific causal effects of adiposity on cardiovascular risk factors. Diabetes. 2015;64(5):1841–52. https://doi.org/10.2337/db14-0988.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Holmes MV, Lange LA, Palmer T, Lanktree MB, North KE, Almoguera B, et al. Causal effects of body mass index on cardiometabolic traits and events: a Mendelian randomization analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;94(2):198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.12.014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Emdin CA, Khera AV, Natarajan P, Klarin D, Zekavat SM, Hsiao AJ, et al. Genetic association of waist-to-hip ratio with cardiometabolic traits, type 2 diabetes, and coronary heart disease. JAMA. 2017;317(6):626–34. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.21042.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Song J, Zhang R, Lv L, Liang J, Wang W, Liu R, et al. The relationship between body mass index and bone mineral density: a Mendelian randomization study. Calcif Tissue Int. 2020;107(5):440–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-020-00736-w.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Ma B, Li C, Pan J, Zhang S, Dong H, Wu Y, et al. Causal associations of anthropometric measurements with fracture risk and bone mineral density: a Mendelian randomization study. J Bone Miner Res. 2021;36(7):1281–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4296.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Rahmani J, Kord-Varkaneh H, Hekmatdoost A, Thompson J, Clark C, Salehisahlabadi A, et al. Body mass index and risk of inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies of over a million participants. Obes Rev. 2019;20(9):1312–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12875.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Rahmani J, Roudsari AH, Bawadi H, Clark C, Ryan PM, Salehisahlabadi A, et al. Body mass index and risk of Parkinson, Alzheimer, dementia, and dementia mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies among 5 million participants. Nutr Neurosci. 2020:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/1028415X.2020.1758888.

  70. Eriksson J, Haring R, Grarup N, Vandenput L, Wallaschofski H, Lorentzen E, et al. Causal relationship between obesity and serum testosterone status in men: a bi-directional Mendelian randomization analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0176277. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176277.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Ruth KS, Day FR, Tyrrell J, Thompson DJ, Wood AR, Mahajan A, et al. Using human genetics to understand the disease impacts of testosterone in men and women. Nat Med. 2020;26(2):252–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0751-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Watts EL, Perez-Cornago A, Knuppel A, Tsilidis KK, Key TJ, Travis RC. Prospective analyses of testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin with the risk of 19 types of cancer in men and postmenopausal women in UK Biobank. Int J Cancer. 2021;149(3):573–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33555.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Garcia-Estevez L, Cortes J, Perez S, Calvo I, Gallegos I, Moreno-Bueno G. Obesity and breast cancer: a paradoxical and controversial relationship influenced by menopausal status. Front Oncol. 2021;11:705911. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.705911.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the FinnGen consortium for making summary-level data from this consortium publicly available.

Funding

This work was supported by research grants from the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet; 2016-01042 and 2019-00977), the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (Forte; 2018-00123), and the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation (Hjärt-Lungfonden; 20190247). Stephen Burgess is supported by Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (204623/Z/16/Z). Open Access funding provided by Karolinska Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unit of Medical Epidemiology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

    Susanna C. Larsson

  2. Unit of Cardiovascular and Nutritional Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Susanna C. Larsson

  3. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Stephen Burgess

  4. MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Stephen Burgess

Authors
  1. Susanna C. Larsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephen Burgess
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SCL had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis; SCL did the literature search, extracted the data, performed the statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript; SB reviewed the data extraction and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. Both authors contributed to data interpretation and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanna C. Larsson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The analyses based on summary-level genetic data were approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (ethics approval number 2019-02793).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Tables S1-S2

. Table S1 – Study quality assessment. Table S2 – Mendelian randomization studies included in the meta-analyses of genetically predicted body mass index in relation to diabetes mellitus, diseases of the circulatory, respiratory, digestive, musculoskeletal, and nervous systems, and neoplasms.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Larsson, S.C., Burgess, S. Causal role of high body mass index in multiple chronic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization studies. BMC Med 19, 320 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02188-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02188-x

Keywords

  • Body mass index
  • Cancer
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Chronic diseases
  • Obesity

BMC Medicine

ISSN: 1741-7015

Contact us