Skip to main content

Table 1 Results of the Mendelian randomization sensitivity analyses associating the liability for one standard deviation increase in attained educational level, household income, Townsend deprivation index, and intelligence with the odds of ADHD

From: The impact and causal directions for the associations between diagnosis of ADHD, socioeconomic status, and intelligence by use of a bi-directional two-sample Mendelian randomization design

Exposure

Method

OR (95% C))

p-value

Education (219 SNPs)

Weighted median

0.34 (0.27, 0.43)

<0.001

MR-Egger

0.39 (0.18, 0.85)

0.018

MR-PRESSO (3 outliers)

0.30 (0.25, 0.36)

<0.001

Contamination mixture

0.23 (0.17, 0.32)

<0.001

MR-Mode

0.58 (0.27, 1.26)

0.168

MR-Mix

0.37 (0.23, 0.59)

<0.001

GSMR

0.29 (0.25–0.34)

<0.001

Household income (42 SNPs)

Weighted median

0.49 (0.34, 0.72)

<0.001

MR-Egger

1.64 (0.38, 7.00)

0.508

MR-PRESSO (1 outlier)

0.38 (0.29, 0.51)

<0.001

Contamination mixture

0.37 (0.25, 0.54)

<0.001

MR-Mode

0.69 (0.34, 1.40)

0.308

MR-Mix

0.37 (0.23, 0.60)

<0.001

GSMR

0.28 (0.21, 0.38)

<0.001

Townsend deprivation index (17 SNPs)

Weighted median

5.51 (2.22, 13.71)

<0.001

MR-Egger

0.04 (0.00, 229.4)

0.482

MR-PRESSO (2 outliers)

4.86 (2.11, 11.19)

0.002

Contamination mixture

8.25 (3.78, 27.39)

0.001

MR-Mode

8.94 (1.58, 50.69)

0.025

MR-Mix

1.00 (1.00, 1.00)

0.99

GSMR

4.92 (2.95, 8.21)

<0.001

Intelligence (132 SNPs)

Weighted median

0.59 (0.48, 0.73)

<0.001

MR-Egger

0.68 (0.27, 1.72)

0.416

MR-PRESSO (4 outliers)

0.58 (0.48, 0.69)

<0.001

Contamination mixture

0.53 (0.44, 0.62)

<0.001

MR-Mode

0.59 (0.37, 0.97)

0.037

MR-Mix

0.50 (0.31–0.81)

0.005

GSMR

0.53 (0.46–0.60)

<0.001