Skip to main content
Download PDF

Plasma protein N-glycome composition associates with postprandial lipaemic response

BMC Medicine volume 21, Article number: 231 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

A dysregulated postprandial metabolic response is a risk factor for chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The plasma protein N-glycome is implicated in both lipid metabolism and T2DM risk. Hence, we first investigate the relationship between the N-glycome and postprandial metabolism and then explore the mediatory role of the plasma N-glycome in the relationship between postprandial lipaemia and T2DM.

Methods

We included 995 individuals from the ZOE-PREDICT 1 study with plasma N-glycans measured by ultra-performance liquid chromatography at fasting and triglyceride, insulin, and glucose levels measured at fasting and following a mixed-meal challenge. Linear mixed models were used to investigate the associations between plasma protein N-glycosylation and metabolic response (fasting, postprandial (Cmax), or change from fasting). A mediation analysis was used to further explore the relationship of the N-glycome in the prediabetes (HbA1c = 39–47 mmol/mol (5.7–6.5%))–postprandial lipaemia association.

Results

We identified 36 out of 55 glycans significantly associated with postprandial triglycerides (Cmax β ranging from -0.28 for low-branched glycans to 0.30 for GP26) after adjusting for covariates and multiple testing (padjusted < 0.05). N-glycome composition explained 12.6% of the variance in postprandial triglycerides not already explained by traditional risk factors. Twenty-seven glycans were also associated with postprandial glucose and 12 with postprandial insulin. Additionally, 3 of the postprandial triglyceride–associated glycans (GP9, GP11, and GP32) also correlate with prediabetes and partially mediate the relationship between prediabetes and postprandial triglycerides.

Conclusions

This study provides a comprehensive overview of the interconnections between plasma protein N-glycosylation and postprandial responses, demonstrating the incremental predictive benefit of N-glycans. We also suggest a considerable proportion of the effect of prediabetes on postprandial triglycerides is mediated by some plasma N-glycans.

Peer Review reports

Background

The majority of the population spend most of their waking day in a postprandial state, a dynamic, non-steady state with rapid fluctuations in glucose, insulin, triglycerides, and inflammatory levels [1]. These postprandial excursions are significant indicators of overall metabolic control [1], and postprandial lipaemia and glycaemia are independent risk factors for the development of cardiovascular and other chronic diseases [2] due to their downstream effects on lipoprotein remodelling, inflammation, oxidative stress, and haemostatic remodelling [3].

Glycosylation is an essential and highly regulated posttranslational modification present on most human proteins [4]. N-glycosylation is the most common form of glycosylation and is highly responsive to genetic, epigenetic, and environmental stimuli [4]. The N-glycome integrates information on immunological (immunoglobulins), inflammatory (acute phase reactants, immunoglobulins), and metabolic (apolipoproteins, AGP) components [4]. One measure of N-glycosylation, glycoprotein acetylation (GlycA), reflects the concentration and glycosylation state of many acute phase glycoproteins, including α1-acid glycoprotein and haptoglobin [4]. Recent studies report GlycA to be a marker of inflammation [5] and found it to associate with CVD [6], type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [7], and triglyceride levels [8]. Moreover, GlycA levels have been shown to change postprandially [2] illustrating the effect diet can have on glycosylation levels. However, to date, there are no published studies investigating the correlations of the complete N-glycome and postprandial responses.

We have previously reported that the complete N-glycome is associated with T2DM, and changes in plasma protein N-glycome composition were found to predict incident T2DM up to 10-years prior to disease onset [9]. These plasma N-glycome changes are gradual and show continuous deterioration toward the clinical manifestation of diabetes [10]. Moreover, previous research suggests that individuals with T2DM are dyslipidaemic, and postprandial levels of triglycerides are an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis in individuals with T2DM [11].

Here, we aimed to explore the correlations and predictive capacity of the N-glycome and postprandial triglyceride, glucose, and insulin responses in the ZOE PREDICT-1 study [1]. Then, given the causal links between glycans and diabetes and correlations with lipid metabolism, we focus on lipaemia and further investigate the mediatory role of the N-glycome in the prediabetes–postprandial lipaemia association.

Methods

A flowchart of the study design is presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the study analytical pipeline and ZOE PREDICT-1 baseline clinical visit

Full size image

Study population

The ZOE PREDICT-1 study was a single-arm nutritional intervention study—conducted between 5 June 2018 and 8 May 2019—designed to quantify and predict individual variations in postprandial triglyceride, glucose, and insulin responses to standardised meals [1]. Study participants were aged between 18 and 65 years recruited from the TwinsUK registry [12] and the general population using online advertising. Participants attended a full day clinical visit consisting of test meal challenges followed by a 13-day home-based phase, as previously described [1].

Data relevant to this analysis pertain to the day 1 baseline clinical measurement visit at St. Thomas’ Hospital, illustrated within Fig. 1 [13]; see Additional file 1: Supplementary methods. Outcome variables were blood triglyceride, glucose, and insulin measured at specific timepoints and increments following test meal challenges [1]. For each of these variables, we considered (i) the baseline fasting measures, (ii) the peak concentration (Cmax) (over the 6-h visit for triglycerides, and 2 h for insulin and glucose, if participants had measurements at each increment), and (iii) the magnitude of increase (delta = peak − baseline), based on our previous reports (see Berry et al. [1]). Given that the ZOE PREDICT-1 study recruited generally healthy individuals, to model the relationship with diabetes, we used impaired fasting glucose, otherwise known as prediabetes. Using HbA1c levels, participants were classified as prediabetic cases if their HbA1c was within 39–47 mmol/mol (5.7–6.5%) [14]; otherwise, they were considered as controls.

Plasma protein N-glycan profiling

Plasma N-glycans were profiled at fasting and again 4 h after the consumption of the first metabolic challenge meal in a sub-sample of the population. Detailed description of plasma protein N-glycan profiling is included in Additional file 1: Supplementary methods. Briefly, plasma samples (V = 10 μl) were denatured and treated with amidase PNGase F (Promega, USA) to cleave N-glycans from plasma proteins. Released plasma protein N-glycans were labelled with a fluorescent label 2-aminobenzamide (2-AB) and subsequently purified by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography solid-phase extraction (HILIC-SPE) using a 0.2-μm wwPTFE filter plate (Pall Corporation, USA). Fluorescently labelled and purified N-glycans were profiled by HILIC on Acquity ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) H-Class instrument (Waters, USA). The instrument consisted of a quaternary solvent manager, a sample manager and a fluorescence detector, controlled by Empower 3 software, build 3471 (Waters, USA). For separation of plasma N-glycans, Waters BEH Glycan chromatography column was used. The resulting chromatograms were all separated in the same manner into 39 glycan peaks (GP1–GP39) (Additional file 2: Supplementary Fig. 1). The amount of glycans in each peak was expressed as a percentage of the total integrated area. A list of N-glycan structures corresponding to each glycan peak is available in Additional file 3: Supplementary table 1. Given that individual glycans share common glycosylation features, including galactosylation, fucosylation, bisecting GlcNAc, and sialylation, derived traits were constructed to represent the proportion of these features. Sixteen derived glycan traits were approximated from the proportion of directly measured glycan peaks (GP1-GP39), each of which combined the glycans with the same structural characteristics (Additional file 3: Supplementary table 2).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were computed using R statistical software, version 3.5.1 [15]. Normalisation and batch correction were performed on UPLC glycan measurements to remove experimental variation. Total area normalisation was performed to make the measurements comparable, followed by the log transformation to obtain normally distributed data. Batch correction was performed using the ComBat function in the R package ‘sva’ [16] by modelling the plate on which the sample was analysed as the batch covariate. Subsequently, the values were transformed back to the original scale.

The association of postprandial responses (fasted, peak (Cmax), and delta values) with each plasma glycan was tested using linear mixed models, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and family relatedness as a random effect (Fig. 1). The values were transformed to standard normal distribution prior to fitting by using the ‘rntransform’ function in the R package ‘GenABEL’ [17]. We controlled for false discovery rate using Benjamini–Hochberg procedure (padjusted < 0.05) [18].

We then investigated to which extent the baseline fasted plasma N-glycans could predict postprandial response (either peak (Cmax) or delta) using elastic net regression (R package ‘glmnet’ [19]). Several models including different sets of predictors were built for comparison:

$$1.\,traditional\,risk\,factors \left(age+sex+BMI\right)$$
$$2.\,N-glycome$$
$$3.\,traditional\,risk\,factors+N-glycome$$
$$4.\,traditional\,risk\,factors+GlycA$$
$$5.\,traditional\,risk\,factors+N-glycome+GlycA$$

Regularisation was applied to all included predictors. Prior to model training, a linear mixed model was used to account for the twin pairs (random effect) in the sample set. The residuals of the model were then centred and scaled. A 10-fold cross validation procedure was used to evaluate the performance, and the average prediction from all test folds was used to calculate R2.

Next, we assessed the relationship between prediabetes and postprandial triglycerides (Cmax) and which postprandial triglyceride-associated glycans also associated with prediabetes using linear mixed models adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and family. After which, we explored the mediatory role of plasma N-glycans (indirect effect) in the relationship between prediabetes and triglycerides. As outlined by Baron and Kenny [20], this multi-step process includes (step one) determining the correlation between prediabetes and triglycerides (the direct effect), (step two) prediabetes and N-glycans, and (step three) N-glycans and triglycerides (while including prediabetes). Mediation analysis was performed using the ‘mediate’ function in the R package ‘mediation’ (version 4.5.0) [21], adjusting for age, sex, and BMI. The significance of the indirect effect of triglycerides on prediabetes status was determined using bootstrapping procedure, where unstandardised indirect effects was computed for each of 1000 bootstrapped samples. A p value < 0.05 indicates a significant mediatory effect. The 95% confidence interval was determined by taking the indirect effect values at the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles. The variance accounted for (VAF) was determined as the ratio of indirect-to-total effect \(\frac{Indirect effect}{Total effect}\) and describes the proportion of the variance explained by the mediation process (the proportion of the effect of prediabetes on triglycerides that goes through N-glycans).

In a sub-analysis, we further investigated postprandial changes in plasma protein N-glycans using a linear mixed model where time was modelled as a fixed effect, while the individual ID was considered as a random effect.

Results

We included 995 healthy adults (716 women and 279 men), including 122 twin pairs, with an average age of 45.6 ± 12 years, and a mean BMI of 25.6 ± 5 kg/m2 from the ZOE-PREDICT 1 study. Demographic characteristics, cardiometabolic blood biomarkers, and metrics of postprandial responses are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Descriptive characteristics of the study participants (n = 995)
Full size table

Association of plasma protein N-glycosylation with postprandial lipaemia

We first examined the associations between plasma protein N-glycans and postprandial levels of triglycerides, glucose, and insulin (both Cmax and change from fasting). Postprandial triglyceride response (Cmax) showed the strongest association with the plasma protein N-glycome. Indeed, significant associations were observed between triglyceride peak concentrations (Cmax 0-6 h) and 36 out of 55 glycan traits (65.5%), after adjusting for covariates and multiple testing (Additional file 3: Supplementary table 3, Fig. 2). The strongest associations were with glycan peaks GP26 (glycan structures FA3G3S2 and A3G3S2) (β = 0.30 (SE = 0.03), padjusted = 1.49 × 10−15) and GP30 (A3G3S3 and A3F1G3S3) (β = 0.28 (0.03), padjusted = 2.55 × 10−15), and levels of low-branched glycans (β =  − 0.28 (0.03), padjusted = 2.55 × 10−15) as well as trigalactosylated (G3; β = 0.26 (0.03), padjusted = 6.78 × 10−14), trisialylated (S3) (β = 0.26 (0.03), padjusted = 1.56 × 10−13), and high-branched glycans (β = 0.26 (0.03), padjusted = 2.32 × 10−13). Consistent, although weaker, associations were observed for both fasting and delta triglyceride concentrations (see Additional file 3: Supplementary table 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Association of plasma N-glycans with postprandial triglyceride levels. Effect size is represented in standard deviation units. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. AF, antennary fucosylation; B, bisecting GlcNAc; CF, core fucosylation; GP, glycan peak; G0, agalactosylation; G1, monogalactosylation; G2, digalactosylation; G3, trigalactosylation; G4, tetragalactoslation; HM, high mannose; HB, high branching; LB, low branching; S0, asialylation; S1, monosialylation; S2, disialylation; S3, trisialylation; S4, tetrasialylation. N-glycan structures corresponding to each glycan peak (GP) are listed in Supplementary table 1. Transparent bars represent non-significant associations at padjusted threshold < 0.05

Full size image

The associations between the of plasma protein N-glycome composition and glycaemic and insulin response were less widespread across the N-glycome and are described in the Additional file 4: Supplementary results. Briefly, 27 and 12 glycan traits were significantly associated with glucose and insulin peaks (Cmax), respectively, after adjusting for covariates and multiple testing (Additional file 3: Supplementary table 4, Supplementary table 5, and Additional file 2: Supplementary Fig. 2).

Predictive capacity of plasma protein N-glycosylation on postprandial peaks (Cmax)

For triglycerides, the plasma protein N-glycome explained an additional 12.6% of the variance in postprandial lipaemic peak (Cmax) compared to a traditional risk factor model (age, sex, and BMI). Alone the N-glycome explained 20% of peak postprandial triglyceride response, while a model combining the traditional risk factors and the N-glycome explained 21%. The further addition of GlycA to the model increases the variance explained to 33.6% (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The variance explained for lipaemic response across various prediction models. Bars depict R2 in descending order, while error bars depict standard deviation. BMI, body mass index; GlycA, glycoprotein acetylation

Full size image

We also tested the predictive capacity of postprandial glycaemic and insulin responses using fasted protein N-glycome composition. The results of which are described in Additional file 4: Supplementary results. Briefly, traditional risk factors could predict 5% of postprandial glucose peak, while the plasma N-glycome could predict 7%, combined this accumulated to 8%, and the further addition of GlycA increased this to 9%. While for insulin, traditional risk factors predicted 10% of postprandial insulin peak, and the N-glycome alone predicted 8%, combined this equated to 11% (Additional file 2: Supplementary Fig. 3).

Relationship between triglycerides, plasma protein N-glycosylation and prediabetic status

In line with previous literature [11], while adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and family, we found that prediabetes status (HbA1c = 39–47 mmol/mol (5.7–6.5%)) was significantly associated with postprandial triglyceride concentrations (Cmax) (Beta [95% CI] = 0.18 [0.02, 0.33]; p = 2.51 × 10−2) (step 1). We have previously reported correlations between insulin resistance/T2DM and several plasma glycans [10]; hence, we tested the 36 glycans that were associated with peak postprandial triglycerides (Cmax) with prediabetes using linear mixed effect models. After adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and family, 2 glycans, GP9 and GP11, were negatively associated with prediabetes, and GP32 was positively associated (step 2). These 3 glycans were also associated with postprandial triglycerides while further adjusting for prediabetes (step 3). Following causal mediation analyses, all 3 significantly mediated the relationship between prediabetes and postprandial triglyceride response (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Mediation analysis diagram. Prediabetes was modelled as the exposure. Postprandial Triglyceride peak (Cmax) was the outcome and N-glycans associated with both exposure and outcome were modelled as mediators. Coefficients depicted are beta [95% CI]

Full size image

Postprandial alterations in plasma protein N-glycosylation

Next, in a sub-analysis, we explored the postprandial changes in the plasma protein N-glycome in 38 participants that had glycan data available at 2 time points (fasted and 4 h after the consumption of the first metabolic challenge meal) using a linear-mixed model. We observed significant postprandial decreases in GP19 (M9) (β =  − 0.23 (standard error = 0.08), padjusted = 0.032) and GP32 (A3G3S3) (β =  − 0.22 (standard error = 0.08), padjusted = 0.021), while accounting for covariates and multiple testing (Fig. 5). Results were consistent when further accounting for the 2 twin pairs within this sample.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Postprandial change in relative abundance of plasma protein N-glycans GP19 and GP32. Green lines denote an increase in glycan abundance, while red lines indicate a decrease. Mean values are shown in black

Full size image

Discussion

This is the first study to comprehensively assess the link between plasma protein N-glycosylation and postprandial metabolic responses. We find that the fasting plasma protein N-glycome is strongly associated with postprandial peak triglyceride levels, particularly glycan structures FA3G3S2 and A3G3S2, A3G3S3 and A3F1G3S3, and levels of low-branched glycans. Moreover, we find that the plasma N-glycome can explain an extra 12.6% of the variance in peak postprandial triglycerides, compared to traditional risk factors. We further showed that 3 plasma N-glycans correlated with prediabetes status and in fact these mediate between 11 and 27% of the effect of prediabetes on peak postprandial triglyceride levels. Lastly, we are the first to report that 2 plasma N-glycans, high mannose M9, and high-branched A3G3S3 decrease following a meal challenge.

The plasma protein glycans we report to be univariately associated with postprandial lipaemia are complex, highly-branched, trigalactosylated, and highly sialylated structures—FA3G3S2, A3G3S2, A3G3S3, A3F1G3S3, alongside a single high mannose glycan—M9. Consistent effects with branched, highly galactosylated and sialylated glycans were also observed for postprandial glycaemic and insulin response. This detrimental health effect of these glycan structure is consistent with previous evidence, which has reported associations with these glycan structures and increased risk of incident T2DM, poorer metabolic control, and an increase in cardiovascular events [9, 10, 22].

Interestingly, we also find postprandial changes in two of these glycan structures, GP19 (M9) and GP32 (A3G3S3). Dietary intake is a known contributor to the glycosylation of proteins, particularly higher sialylation with healthier dietary patterns [23]. But, to date, this is the first study to demonstrate acute effects. The M9 glycan (GP19) is known to predominantly originate from apolipoprotein B-100. Apolipoprotein B-100 is the core structural protein of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles [24]. Lipoproteins have been shown to be dysfunctional and of altered composition/size in T2DM [25, 26], and their apolipoprotein and remodelling protein constituents can be readily glycosylated [27]. In our data, we report a postprandial decrease in M9 reflecting reduced liver secretion of VLDL particles in response to increased postprandial insulin levels and increased influx of chylomicron particles carrying exogenous triglycerides [28]. A3G3S3 (GP32) has multiple protein sources [29], and reduced levels might reflect the recruitment of alpha-1 acid glycoprotein in response to the increased nutrient flux [30, 31]. The lack of postprandial changes in the other plasma glycan structures is likely due to the short period between the two measurements (4 h), since most of the plasma glycoproteins have a half-life ranging from 2 to 5 days (except transferrin (8–10 days) and immunoglobulin G (~ 23 days)).

We further examined, in a multivariable model, whether the fasting composition of the plasma N-glycome could predict postprandial metabolic response to standardized meals. We found that the N-glycome explained 20% of the variance in peak triglyceride concentrations, more than double that of a traditional risk factor model (age, sex, and BMI (9%)). Moreover, we highlight the incremental utility of the N-glycome and GlycA in the prediction of peak triglyceride concentrations. Where a model integrating traditional risk factors, the N-glycome, and GlycA exhibited the best overall performance, explaining more than one third (34%) of the variation. This is likely due to complementary information on inflammatory and metabolic status of an individual that the N-glycome and GlycA incorporate, which are both significant determinants of cardiometabolic risk [9, 32, 33].

Numerous studies have found strong links between insulin resistance or prediabetes on postprandial lipaemia [11, 34,35,36]. Importantly, we have previously shown that several glycans including GP10, GP16, GP18, GP19, GP20, and GP34 are significantly associated with insulin resistance and T2DM [10], and in this study, we report an association between prediabetes and peak postprandial triglyceride concentrations We therefore investigated if the effect of prediabetes on postprandial triglyceride levels could be mediated in-part by the three specific glycans related to prediabetes (GP9, GP11, and GP32) which are also associated with postprandial triglycerides. Indeed, all 3 plasma N-glycans were significantly mediating this relationship. This is consistent with previous research which implicate inflammation and vascular function as possible mediators of the pathological impact of postprandial lipemia, and glycosylation is known to play a significant role in these processes [6, 37, 38]. Given the correlation between prediabetes and postprandial lipaemia, and postprandial decreases in M9, a glycan linked with apolipoproteins, the mediatory role of N-glycans in the prediabetes and lipaemia association may also be due to impaired lipoprotein structure and function owing to modified glycosylation [25,26,27]. However, we are unable to know whether fasted N-glycans are causal in this relationship. To dissect the directionality of this relationship, studies designed specifically to measure exposure, mediator, and outcome in that specific temporal order, while accounting for all potential confounders are necessary [39].

This study identifies a significant relationship between the N-glycome, postprandial lipaemia, and prediabetes. However, despite the integral nature of glucose and insulin levels to T2DM development, our work suggests that the N-glycome is less involved in postprandial glucose and insulin responses, suggesting that the mechanisms at play are mainly inflammatory and vascular. Indeed, the relationship between insulin/glucose and prediabetes is considered direct (inadequate insulin secretion and inefficient insulin sensitivity of the liver, which fails to downregulate glucose levels). However, this finding may also be explained by the generally healthy nature of the study participants with an average peak postprandial glucose concentration of 7.33 mmol/L while glycosylation is induced by levels > 7.8–8.9 mmol/L [40].

Our study has several strengths—it used a mixed nutrient sequential test meal challenge. While studying the impact of nutrition and dietary components on risk profiles, most research has taken a very simplistic approach, examining the effect of a single determinant in isolation. However, the combined impact of multiple factors, representing a more realistic scenario should be considered. It is also the first study to thoroughly explore the link between plasma protein N-glycosylation and postprandial metabolic responses, where it revealed extensive associations between the two. It also demonstrated the value of fasting plasma N-glycome composition in predicting postprandial lipaemic response and proposed for the first time that plasma protein glycosylation may mediate the effect of glucose dysregulation on postprandial lipemia.

The current study also has several limitations—firstly, the plasma protein N-glycome was not profiled at all available time points, which disabled us from exploring the full longitudinal dynamics of glycosylation changes in respect to postprandial metabolic response. Second, as the ZOE PREDICT-1 trial participants were generally healthy, we were unable to explore direct relationships with T2DM and instead were only able to explore impaired fasting glucose (prediabetes). Third, our mediation analysis also had some limitations, including (i) a relatively low sample size for such analysis (only 237 participants with prediabetes) and (ii) no evidence of temporal relationship between exposure, mediator, and outcome, which would, again, require longitudinal glycomic data to confirm the exact triangular relationship. Fourth, the design of our study prevents any inferences of directionality or causality. Fifth, our study sample is predominantly female (72%), thus limiting the generalisability of our findings. Sixth, the scope of our study did not include functional elucidation of plausible pathways that could explain the observed changes in glycosylation. Therefore, mechanisms remain speculative and future studies should seek to explore this. Lastly, although our outcome (triglyceride response) was the response of a tightly controlled intervention (standardised meal), the potential endogenous factors that may influence lipid metabolism are vast (reviewed in [41]) and include multiple psychological factors, visceral adiposity, and sex, requiring in-depth focussed research to elucidate.

Conclusions

This study comprehensively studies the interconnections between the plasma protein N-glycome and postprandial responses, demonstrates the incremental improvement of the N-glycome in predicting lipaemic response, and suggests a mediatory role within the relationship between prediabetes and postprandial lipaemia. Further in-depth analyses are necessary to understand causality and confounding within this relationship and the mechanistic role of specific N-glycans or glycosylation features in the relationship between and impaired fasting glucose and postprandial triglycerides.

Availability of data and materials

The data used in this study are held by the department of Twin Research at King’s College London. The data can be released to bona fide researchers using our normal procedures overseen by the Wellcome Trust and its guidelines as part of our core funding (https://twinsuk.ac.uk/resources-for-researchers/access-our-data/).

Abbreviations

2-AB:

2-Aminobenzamide

BMI:

Body mass index

GlycA:

Glycoprotein acetylation

GP:

Glycan peak

HILIC-SPE:

Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography solid-phase extraction

T2DM:

Type-2 diabetes mellitus

UPLC:

Ultra-performance liquid chromatography

VAF:

Variance accounted for

VLDL:

Very low-density lipoprotein

References

  1. Berry SE, Valdes AM, Drew DA, Asnicar F, Mazidi M, Wolf J, Capdevila J, Hadjigeorgiou G, Davies R, Al Khatib H, et al. Human postprandial responses to food and potential for precision nutrition. Nat Med. 2020;26(6):964–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Mazidi M, Valdes AM, Ordovas JM, Hall WL, Pujol JC, Wolf J, Hadjigeorgiou G, Segata N, Sattar N, Koivula R, et al. Meal-induced inflammation: postprandial insights from the Personalised REsponses to DIetary Composition Trial (PREDICT) study in 1000 participants. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021;114(3):1028–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Jackson KG, Poppitt SD, Minihane AM. Postprandial lipemia and cardiovascular disease risk: interrelationships between dietary, physiological and genetic determinants. Atherosclerosis. 2012;220(1):22–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ajit Varki, Richard D. Cummings, Jeffrey D. Esko, Pamela Stanley, Gerald W. Hart, Markus Aebi, Debra Mohnen, Taroh Kinoshita, Nicolle H. Packer, James H. Prestegard et al. Essentials of Glycobiology. edn. Edited by Varki A, Cummings RD, Esko JD, Stanley P, Hart GW, Aebi M, Mohnen D, Kinoshita T, Packer NH, Prestegard JH et al. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Copyright © 2022 by the Consortium of Glycobiology Editors. La Jolla, California. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York. 2022.

  5. Ballout RA, Remaley AT. GlycA: a new biomarker for systemic inflammation and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment. J Lab Precis Med. 2020;5:17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Menni C, Gudelj I, Macdonald-Dunlop E, Mangino M, Zierer J, Bešić E, Joshi PK, Trbojević-Akmačić I, Chowienczyk PJ, Spector TD, et al. Glycosylation profile of immunoglobulin g is cross-sectionally associated with cardiovascular disease risk score and subclinical atherosclerosis in two independent cohorts. Circ Res. 2018;122(11):1555–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Dierckx T, Verstockt B, Vermeire S, van Weyenbergh J. GlycA, a nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy measure for protein glycosylation, is a viable biomarker for disease activity in IBD. J Crohns Colitis. 2019;13(3):389–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiesa ST, Charakida M, Georgiopoulos G, Roberts JD, Stafford SJ, Park C, Mykkänen J, Kähönen M, Lehtimäki T, Ala-Korpela M, et al. Glycoprotein acetyls: a novel inflammatory biomarker of early cardiovascular risk in the young. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(4):e024380.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wittenbecher C, Štambuk T, Kuxhaus O, Rudman N, Vučković F, Štambuk J, Schiborn C, Rahelić D, Dietrich S, Gornik O, et al. Plasma N-glycans as emerging biomarkers of cardiometabolic risk: a prospective investigation in the EPIC-Potsdam cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(3):661–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cvetko A, Mangino M, Tijardović M, Kifer D, Falchi M, Keser T, Perola M, Spector TD, Lauc G, Menni C, et al. Plasma N-glycome shows continuous deterioration as the diagnosis of insulin resistance approaches. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021;9(1):e002263.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Aslam M, Aggarwal S, Sharma KK, Galav V, Madhu SV. Postprandial hypertriglyceridemia predicts development of insulin resistance glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0145730.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Verdi S, Abbasian G, Bowyer RCE, Lachance G, Yarand D, Christofidou P, Mangino M, Menni C, Bell JT, Falchi M, et al. TwinsUK: the UK Adult Twin Registry Update. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2019;22(6):523–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Louca P, Berry SE, Bermingham K, Franks PW, Wolf J, Spector TD, Valdes AM, Chowienczyk P, Menni C. Postprandial responses to a standardised meal in hypertension: the mediatory role of visceral fat mass. Nutrients. 2022;14(21):4499.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(Suppl 1):S81-90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 3.6.3. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leek JT, Johnson WE, Parker HS, Jaffe AE, Storey JD. The sva package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(6):882–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Aulchenko YS, Ripke S, Isaacs A, van Duijn CM. GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(10):1294–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc: Ser B (Methodol). 1995;57(1):289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw. 2010;33(1):1–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tingley D, Yamamoto T, Hirose K, Keele L, Imai K. mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. J Stat Softw. 2014;59(5):38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Keser T, Gornik I, Vučković F, Selak N, Pavić T, Lukić E, Gudelj I, Gašparović H, Biočina B, Tilin T, et al. Increased plasma N-glycome complexity is associated with higher risk of type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2017;60(12):2352–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim T, Xie Y, Li Q, Artegoitia VM, Lebrilla CB, Keim NL, Adams SH, Krishnan S. Diet affects glycosylation of serum proteins in women at risk for cardiometabolic disease. Eur J Nutr. 2021;60(7):3727–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Feingold KR, et al. Introduction to lipids and lipoproteins. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, et al., editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth: MDText.com, Inc. Copyright © 2000–2022, MDText.com, Inc; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yoshino G, Hirano T, Kazumi T. Dyslipidemia in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1996;33(1):1–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kane JP, Pullinger CR, Goldfine ID, Malloy MJ. Dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus: role of lipoprotein species and interrelated pathways of lipid metabolism in diabetes mellitus. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2021;61:21–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pirillo A, Svecla M, Catapano AL, Holleboom AG, Norata GD. Impact of protein glycosylation on lipoprotein metabolism and atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Res. 2021;117(4):1033–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Leavens KF, Birnbaum MJ. Insulin signaling to hepatic lipid metabolism in health and disease. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2011;46(3):200–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Clerc F, Reiding KR, Jansen BC, Kammeijer GS, Bondt A, Wuhrer M. Human plasma protein N-glycosylation. Glycoconj J. 2016;33(3):309–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ruiz M. Into the labyrinth of the lipocalin α1-acid glycoprotein. Front Physiol. 2021;12:686251.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hochepied T, Berger FG, Baumann H, Libert C. Alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein: an acute phase protein with inflammatory and immunomodulating properties. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2003;14(1):25–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Knezevic A, Gornik O, Polasek O, Pucic M, Redzic I, Novokmet M, Rudd PM, Wright AF, Campbell H, Rudan I, et al. Effects of aging, body mass index, plasma lipid profiles, and smoking on human plasma N-glycans. Glycobiology. 2010;20(8):959–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Akinkuolie AO, Buring JE, Ridker PM, Mora S. A novel protein glycan biomarker and future cardiovascular disease events. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(5):e001221.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Chakraborty M, Singh P, Dsouza JMP, Pethusamy K, Thatkar PV. Fasting and postprandial lipid parameters: a comparative evaluation of cardiovascular risk assessment in prediabetes and diabetes. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(1):287–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Madhu SV, Kant S, Srivastava S, Kant R, Sharma SB, Bhadoria DP. Postprandial lipaemia in patients with impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;80(3):380–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lambadiari V, Korakas E, Tsimihodimos V. The impact of dietary glycemic index and glycemic load on postprandial lipid kinetics, dyslipidemia and cardiovascular risk. Nutrients. 2020;12(8):2204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Novokmet M, Lukić E, Vučković F, Ðurić Ž, Keser T, Rajšl K, Remondini D, Castellani G, Gašparović H, Gornik O, et al. Changes in IgG and total plasma protein glycomes in acute systemic inflammation. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4347.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Preston RJ, Rawley O, Gleeson EM, O’Donnell JS. Elucidating the role of carbohydrate determinants in regulating hemostasis: insights and opportunities. Blood. 2013;121(19):3801–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Li Y, Yoshida K, Kaufman JS, Mathur MB. A brief primer on conducting regression-based causal mediation analysis. Psychol Trauma. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001421.

  40. Dimitriadis GD, Maratou E, Kountouri A, Board M, Lambadiari V. Regulation of postabsorptive and postprandial glucose metabolism by insulin-dependent and insulin-independent mechanisms: an integrative approach. Nutrients. 2021;13(1):159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Lopez-Miranda J, Williams C, Lairon D. Dietary, physiological, genetic and pathological influences on postprandial lipid metabolism. Br J Nutr. 2007;98(3):458–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank all the participants of the PREDICT 1 study, the staff of ZOE Ltd, the Department of Twin Research and Massachusetts General Hospital, and all the members of the Berry, Segata, and Spector labs for their work in running of the study and data processing.

Funding

This work was supported by the Chronic Disease Research Foundation (CDRF) and in part by the Wellcome Trust [Grant number: 212904/Z/18/Z]. For the purpose of open access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any author accepted manuscript version arising from this submission. Glycosylation analysis was supported by the European Structural and Investment Funds IRI “CardioMetabolic” grant (KK.01.2.1.02.0321), Centre of Competence in Molecular Diagnostics (#KK.01.2.2.03.0006), and Croatian National Centre of Research Excellence in Personalized Healthcare grant (#KK.01.1.1.01.0010) to GL. CM is funded by the CDRF and by the MRC Aim-Hy project grant. PL is supported by the CDRF (CDRF–15/2018). The work of doctoral student Helena Deriš has been supported in part by the “Young researchers' career development project—training of doctoral students” of the Croatian Science Foundation.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Panayiotis Louca, Tamara Štambuk, Azra Frkatović-Hodžić, Gordan Lauc and Cristina Menni have equal contributions.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital Campus, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK

    Panayiotis Louca, Ana Nogal, Massimo Mangino, Tim D. Spector & Cristina Menni

  2. Genos Glycoscience Research Laboratory, Zagreb, Croatia

    Tamara Štambuk, Azra Frkatović-Hodžić, Helena Deriš, Martina Vinicki & Gordan Lauc

  3. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Foundation Trust, London, SE1 9RT, UK

    Massimo Mangino

  4. Department of Nutritional Sciences, King’s College London, Franklin Wilkins Building, London, SE1 9NH, UK

    Sarah E. Berry

  5. ZOE Ltd, London, UK

    George Hadjigeorgiou & Jonathan Wolf

  6. Lund University Diabetes Center, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden

    Paul W. Franks

  7. Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden

    Paul W. Franks

  8. Academic Rheumatology Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham City Hospital, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

    Ana M. Valdes

  9. University of Zagreb Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Zagreb, Croatia

    Gordan Lauc

Authors
  1. Panayiotis Louca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tamara Štambuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Azra Frkatović-Hodžić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ana Nogal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Massimo Mangino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sarah E. Berry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Helena Deriš
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. George Hadjigeorgiou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jonathan Wolf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Martina Vinicki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Paul W. Franks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ana M. Valdes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Tim D. Spector
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Gordan Lauc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Cristina Menni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

G. L. and C. M. conceived and designed the experiment; T. S. and A. F–H. ran the analyses and verified the underlying data; P. L., T. S., A. FH., and C. M. wrote the original manuscript. M. M., A. N., S. E. B., H. D., G. H., J. W., M. V., P. W. F., A. M. V., and T. D. S. contributed methods/materials/analysis tools. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina Menni.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

In accordance with the declaration of Helsinki, all participants provided informed written consent, and the study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee and Integrated Research Application System (IRAS 236407). The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT03479866) https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03479866.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

GL is the founder and CEO of Genos Ltd, a private research organisation that specialises in high throughput glycomics analysis and has several patents in this field. TŠ, AF, HD, and MV are employees of Genos Ltd. TDS is co-founder and shareholder of ZOE Ltd. AMV and SEB receive options and are consultants for ZOE Ltd. JW is an employee of ZOE Ltd. All other authors have nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Supplementary methods.

Additional file 2: Supplementary Figure 1.

Representative HILIC-UPLC-FLR chromatogram of plasma protein N-glycome. Supplementary Figure 2. Association of plasma glycans with postprandial glucose and insulin levels. Supplementary Figure 3. The variance explained for glycaemic response and insulin response across various prediction models.

Additional file 3: Supplementary Table 1.

List of glycan structures corresponding to every individual plasma protein glycan peak. Supplementary Table 2. Plasma protein derived glycan traits calculated out of 39 initial plasma glycan peaks. Supplementary Table 3. Associations between plasma protein N-glycome and triglycerides. Supplementary Table 4. Associations between plasma protein N-glycome and glucose. Supplementary table 5. Associations between plasma protein N-glycome and insulin.

Additional file 4.

Supplementary results.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Louca, P., Štambuk, T., Frkatović-Hodžić, A. et al. Plasma protein N-glycome composition associates with postprandial lipaemic response. BMC Med 21, 231 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-02938-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-02938-z

Keywords

BMC Medicine

ISSN: 1741-7015

Contact us