Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Initiation and duration of folic acid supplementation in preventing congenital malformations

BMC Medicine volume 21, Article number: 292 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Folic acid (FA) supplementation is associated with a lower risk of the neural tube and heart defects and is recommended for women of childbearing age. Although there are detailed recommendations, differences in the initiation time and duration of FA supplementation remain poorly studied.

Methods

A multicentre prospective study of 17,713 women was conducted. The incidence of congenital malformations in women taking a recommended dosage (e.g. 0.4 or 0.8 mg/day) of FA was compared with that in women without supplementation. The predicted probability of malformations by the initiation time and duration of FA use was estimated to determine optimal options.

Results

Periconceptional FA supplementation was associated with a lower and insignificant risk of congenital malformations (1.59% vs. 2.37%; odds ratio [OR] 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44–1.08), heart defects (3.8 vs. 8.0 per 1000 infants; OR, 0.47; 0.21–1.02), and neural tube defects (7.0 vs. 11.5 per 10,000 infants; OR, 0.64; 0.08–5.15). FA use after pregnancy provided greater protection against total malformations. Statistically significant associations were found in women who initiated FA supplementation in the first month of gestation (OR, 0.55; 95% CI: 0.33–0.91) and in those who supplemented for 1 to 2 months (OR, 0.59; 95% CI: 0.36–0.98). Similar results were found for heart defects. The optimal initiation time was 1.5 (optimal range: 1.1 to 1.9) months before pregnancy and a duration of 4.0 (3.7 to 4.4) months was reasonable to achieve the lowest risk of congenital malformations. Heart defect prevention required an earlier initiation (2.2 vs. 1.1 months before pregnancy) and a longer duration (4.7 vs. 3.7 months) than the prevention of other malformations.

Conclusions

The timely initiation of FA supplementation for gestation was associated with a decreased risk of congenital malformations, which was mainly attributed to its protection against heart defects. The initiation of FA supplementation 1.5 months before conception with a duration of 4 months is the preferred option for congenital malformation prevention.

Trial registration

Chictr.org.cn identifier: ChiCTR-SOC-17010976.

Peer Review reports

Background

Congenital malformations are structural or functional defects that occur during prenatal development and are associated with infantile short-term death and long-term disabilities [1]. It has been estimated that at least 7.9 million people are born with a birth defect every year worldwide and 3.3 million of them die annually before 5 years of age [2]. Although the exact mechanisms of the majority of congenital malformations remain unknown, some specific congenital anomalies could be prevented by periconceptional intervention, such as folic acid (FA) supplementation to protect against neural tube defects (NTDs) [3]. In addition to protection against NTDs, FA supplementation is associated with a lower risk of the cardiac, urinary tract, and limb defects [4,5,6]. Based on these primary prevention effects, periconceptional FA use has been recommended by the US government and the World Health Organization for all women of childbearing age since 1992 [7, 8].

The recommendations made FA widely available for women of childbearing age and have led to substantial achievements in preventing NTDs [3]. However, inconsistent and imprecise results were found for the difference in the initiation of therapy, and there are no studies on the duration of supplementation [3]. Furthermore, although the China Maternal and Child Health Association guidelines provide detailed recommendations on the initiation time and duration of FA supplementation [9], comparative studies of the preventive effects of FA supplementation in different scenarios are rarely reported.

Given that the sensitive and vulnerable early period of foetal development is between the 3rd and the 8th weeks of gestation [5] and that a sustained period (e.g. 12 weeks) of FA is required to achieve an effective red-blood-cell (RBC) folate level for attenuating the risk of NTDs [10, 11], the guideline recommended starting FA 3 months before conception or initiating supplementation immediately after pregnancy [9]. However, as most pregnant women in China have their first prenatal care visit after the 7thweek of gestation [12], this may delay the initiation of FA. Inappropriate FA supplementation may reduce the effectiveness of prevention (e.g. inadequate supplementation) [13], increase the financial burden, or even endanger the health of the foetus (e.g. excessive supplementation), including increasing the risk of childhood asthma and congenital malformations [14, 15]. Therefore, the determination of the optimal initiation time and duration is critical for better protection efficacy and to prevent side effects from excessive supplementation [16]. We conducted a multicentre prospective cohort study to determine the optimal initiation time and duration of FA supplementation for preventing congenital malformations.

Methods

Study design

This was a multicentre prospective cohort study of early pregnancy ultrasound screening, maternal exposures and risk of congenital malformations. This investigation was conducted between August 2017 and August 2020 [17]. Pregnant women with a singleton pregnancy who underwent early pregnancy ultrasound examinations at 23 tertiary hospitals between 11 and 13 weeks of gestation were recruited from August 2017 to March 2019. Data on maternal general characteristics (e.g. age, education level, region, history of adverse pregnancy outcomes), periconceptional maternal exposure and early pregnancy complications and treatments (e.g. medicine exposure, vaginal bleeding, FA supplementation, or progesterone supplementation) were collected by trained clinicians through face-to-face interviews at recruitment.

Congenital malformations were diagnosed through routine prenatal and postnatal exams (e.g. ultrasound examinations, serum marker detections, physical examinations, and abnormality surveillance) and checked by reviewing medical records. We excluded women who were lost to follow-up from the analysis.

Folic acid supplementation

During recruitment, women were surveyed regarding whether they received supplementation (e.g. FA alone or FA-containing multivitamin supplementation) by showing them a list of common FA products. Details (e.g. times and quantities of FA prescriptions) were extracted from the medical records to determine the initiation time and estimate the duration of supplementation. Daily intake of the recommended dosages (0.4 or 0.8 mg) of FA for at least 1 month was defined as having the supplementation. Since 12 weeks of supplementation is critical for effective folate concentrations and 3 months before pregnancy up to the third month of the pregnancy are key supplemental points in the guideline [9,10,11], we classified the women who took FA into three categories: preconception initiation for more than 3 months, preconception supplementation within 3 months, or FA supplementation after becoming pregnant according to the initiation time. The time of pregnancy was estimated based on a reliable last menstrual period and/or confirmed by the size of the gestational sac or embryo measured by ultrasound in early pregnancy. We also subgrouped the women by duration into groups with durations ≤ or > 3 months. Women without FA supplementation were referred to as the no supplement group.

No women in the no supplement group took periconceptional FA in the current pregnancy. Among the included women, 16 women whose supplementation information was not available were marked as the FA unknown group. These women and an additional 252 persons whose supplemental details were missing were excluded from the assessment of the association of the initiation time and duration of FA use with congenital malformations.

Congenital malformations

Congenital malformations were diagnosed by a standardized protocol. Five routine exams were performed during the follow-up period, including serum testing for Down syndrome screening, first (11–13 weeks of gestation) and second trimester (24–28 weeks of gestation) ultrasound examinations, postpartum physical examinations (birth to discharge) and the birth defect monitoring (discharge to the sixth week after birth) [17, 18]. For those suspected of congenital malformations, further examinations, including detailed echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, serum/amniotic fluid genetic testing, or pathological anatomy, were performed to confirm the specifics of the malformations or to exclude a diagnosis. All malformations were adjudicated by a member of the quality control committee by reviewing medical records.

All malformations were coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. In the present study, cardiovascular anomalies (IDC-10 codes: Q20 to Q28) and NTD, including anencephaly (Q00.0 to Q00.1) and spina bifida (Q05.0 to Q05.9, Q07.01, and Q07.03), were considered secondary outcomes.

Potential confounders

Data on variables that might be potential confounders were collected, including general characteristics (e.g. maternal age, region, ethnicity, maternal education level, family income level, conception mode, and parity), history of adverse pregnancy outcomes, early pregnancy conditions, and medicine exposure. A history of adverse pregnancy outcomes included miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, infertility, induced labour, congenital malformations, or preterm birth in previous pregnancies. Early pregnant conditions referred to influenza/cold, a fever ≥ 38 ℃, skin rash, vaginal bleeding, thyroid dysfunction, gestational hyperglycaemia/diabetes, gastrointestinal diseases, and gynaecological inflammation or diseases.

Data analyses

The incidence and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated for total and various organ malformations. Differences in the proportion of general characteristics and congenital malformations between women with and without FA supplementation were compared by chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests.

The primary analyses were conducted to study the association between FA category (e.g. yes vs. no; various FA groups vs. no FA) and the risk of congenital malformations. The analyses aimed to compare the difference in the effectiveness of FA supplementation in preventing congenital malformations at the main guideline-recommended initiation and duration of supplementation. Binary logistic regression was performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for congenital malformations in women with supplementation relative to those without supplementation. Adjusted ORs were evaluated after controlling for region, ethnicity, medicine exposure, maternal education level, family income level adverse pregnancy outcome history, early pregnancy conditions, conception mode, parity, and maternal age.

Sensitivity analyses restricted to natural conception, Han ethnicity, and women without a malformation history were performed to test the robustness of the results. Since a history of adverse pregnancy outcome (e.g. infertility [19], malformation history), gestational conditions (e.g. influenza) [20], medicine exposure [21], multiparity [22], and advanced maternal age [23] are associated with a higher risk of congenital malformations, stratification analyses were conducted according to these variables.

To compare the disparity in the protection of FA supplementation against congenital malformations between women with pre- and post-conception initiation, we evaluated the association according to the initiation of the supplementation (e.g. pre- or post-conception). Further analyses were performed in women who started FA before pregnancy (e.g. > or ≤ 3 months before pregnancy). In these analyses, we grouped the women according to the month they started FA supplementation to understand the change in the protective effect.

The secondary analyses focused on the association of continuous initiation and the duration of FA supplementation with congenital malformations. The malformation risks were compared among women with varying combinations of the initiation time and duration of FA supplementation. The association was further estimated through the nonlinear fitting of the predicted probability of binary logistic regression. The details of the fit curves were summarized, and the models were considered to be good if an R-squared value > 0.75 was obtained. The best options for the initiation time and duration were selected based on the lowest risk of malformations. Optional ranges in which the malformation risk was noninferior to the lowest level were identified, with a margin of 50% of the standard error.

The FA supplementation and reduction risk for heart defects and NTDs were estimated. Sensitivity and stratification analyses (pre- or post-conception FA) were conducted for heart defects but not for NTDs, as there was only one NTD in women without FA supplementation. There might be different optimal initiation times between heart defects and the other malformations. Therefore, further analyses on the FA initiation time and duration of FA supplementation were performed between heart defects and other malformations.

All analyses were conducted in SAS version 9.3, Microsoft Office Excel, and Stata (version 14.0, Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA). A two-sided P < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.

Results

General characteristics of the women

The main characteristics were balanced between the women who were included and excluded in the analysis (Additional file 1: Table S1). Among the 16,751 included women, 15,848 (94.6%) received FA (Fig. 1). The majority of the studied women was of Han ethnicity and had conceived naturally. Differences in all characteristics except for region and ethnicity were found between women with and without supplementation (Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of study

Full size image
Table 1 General characteristics and incidence of congenital malformations between women with and without folic acid supplementation
Full size table

At the end of follow-up, 273 congenital malformations were confirmed, with an incidence of 16.3 (95% CI, 14.5–18.3) per 1000 infants. Among them, 67 were heart defects (4.0 per 1000 infants, 95% CI: 3.2–5.1), and 12 NTDs were identified (7.0 per 10,000 infants, 95% CI: 3.0–11.0; Additional file 1: Table S2).

FA supplementation and risk of congenital malformations

Women with FA supplementation had a lower incidence of congenital malformations than those without the supplementation (1.59% vs. 2.37%; adjusted OR, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.44–1.08; Fig. 2). Compared with women without supplementation, women with FA initiated after becoming pregnant had the lowest risk (OR, 0.63; 95% CI: 0.40–1.01; Fig. 2). No significant differences in protection were found between women with FA supplementation duration of ≤ 3 and > 3 months (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Association between folic acid supplementation and risk of congenital malformations. Odds ratios for the risk of malformations were estimated in women with folic acid compared with those without supplementation after controlling for region, maternal age, ethnicity, parity, conception mode, education level, family income, history of adverse pregnancy outcomes, medicine exposure, and early pregnancy conditions

Full size image

Sensitivity analyses that were restricted to women with Han ethnicity and those without a history of congenital malformations did not show significant changes. However, FA supplementation was associated with a decreased risk of congenital malformations in women who conceived naturally (OR, 0.63; 95% CI: 0.40–0.99; Additional file 1: Tables S3).

Stratification analyses indicated that no significant associations existed between variants of FA supplementation and congenital malformations in women with a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes, those who had a medicine exposure, multiparous women, and those with advanced age (e.g. > 35 years) (Additional file 1: Tables S4-S7). However, the protection effect of FA was detected in women with early pregnancy conditions (Additional file 1: Table S8).

Pre- and post-conception FA supplementation

Compared with women without FA supplementation, the risk of congenital malformations was lower in women who started FA after pregnancy. The association was (marginally) statistically significant in the sensitive analyses (Additional file 1: Table S3). Further analyses indicated that, among women who initiated FA after becoming pregnant, an earlier initiation (e.g. the first month of gestation, OR, 0.55; 95% CI: 0.33–0.91) and a moderate duration (e.g. 1.01–2 months, OR, 0.59; 95% CI: 0.36–0.98) were associated with a reduced risk of congenital malformations relative to those without supplementation (Table 2). Preconceptional initiation of FA, including in subgroups of women who started the supplementation > or ≤ 3 months before pregnancy, was not significantly associated with congenital malformations (Additional file 1: Tables S9-11).

Table 2 Post-conception folic acid supplementation and risk of congenital malformations
Full size table

Optimal options for the initiation time and duration of FA supplementation

Among the various initiation time and duration combinations, women who started FA supplementation 2.5 months before pregnancy with a duration of 5.5 months, those who initiated FA 1.5 months before pregnancy with a duration of 4.5 months, and women who started FA after becoming pregnant and with a duration of 2.5 months had similar and better performance (Additional file 2: Figure S1).

The initiation and duration of FA supplementation and the predicted probability of congenital malformations presented a well-fitted quadratic regression relationship (Additional file 1: Table S12). The best optimal initiation time of FA supplementation was 1.5 months before pregnancy, with an optional range from 1.1 to 1.9 months before pregnancy. During this period, women with FA supplementation had the lowest risk of congenital malformations at 1.52%. The optimal option for the duration of FA supplementation was 4.0 (3.7 to 4.4) months (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Predicted probability of congenital malformations by the initiation and duration of folic acid supplementation. The predicted probabilities of congenital malformations in women without folic acid supplementation were 2.35% and 2.37% in the initiation (A) and duration (B) analyses, respectively. The tolerable risk was 1.519% and 1.492% for the initiation and duration of folic acid supplementation, respectively

Full size image

FA supplementation and risk of heart defects and NTDs

FA supplementation was marginally significantly associated with the risk of heart defects (3.8 vs. 8.0 per 1000 infants; adjusted OR, 0.47; 95% CI: 0.21–1.02; Table 3). Similar results were found in sensitivity analyses (Additional file 1: Tables S13). Women who initiated FA after pregnancy had a better preventive effect against heart defects than those who started FA supplementation before pregnancy (Table 4). FA supplementation started in the second month of gestation was significantly associated with a reduced risk of heart defects (OR, 0.37; 95% CI: 0.14–0.98). Although no significant associations were found, women who initiated FA between 2 and 1 month before pregnancy had the lowest risk of having an infant with a heart defect (OR, 0.29; 95% CI: 0.06–1.43; Table 4). FA supplementation was not associated with NTDs. However, women who started the supplementation after pregnancy had a 67% lower risk of NTDs relative to those without supplementation (Table 3).

Table 3 Folic acid supplementation and risk of heart defects and neural tube defects
Full size table
Table 4 Pre- and post-conception folic acid supplementation and risk of heart defects
Full size table

Disparities in the optimal options for the initiation time and duration were found between heart defects and the other malformations: the options for initiation were 2.2 (1.7 to 2.7) and 1.1 (0.6 to 1.5) months before pregnancy, while the durations were 4.7 (4.2 to 5.1) and 3.7 (3.4 to 4.0) months, respectively (Additional file 2: Figures S2-S4). The models fit well, with all R-squared values > 0.80 (Additional file 1: Table S12).

Discussion

Principal findings of the study

Periconceptional FA supplementation had a protective effect against total congenital malformations and heart defects but not against NTDs. The reduction in the risk of congenital malformations reached significance when supplementation was initiated after pregnancy. The optimal initiation time of FA supplementation was 1.5 months before pregnancy with a 4-month duration to obtain the lowest incidence of malformations. An earlier initiation and a longer duration of FA supplementation were needed for heart defect prevention than for the prevention of other malformations.

Context within previous literature

The association between FA supplementation and a reduced risk of NTDs was first reported by Smithells in 1980 [24]. Since then, this effect has been demonstrated by one randomized controlled trial and a substantial number of observational studies [25,26,27,28,29]. In the present study, women who initiated FA supplementation after pregnancy had a 67% lower risk of NTDs. However, FA supplementation was not associated with a significantly reduced risk of NTDs. This was consistent with the results of women in the southern region in previous studies in China [30, 31]. The process of neural tube closure is complex and is influenced by poor nutritional status, especially low folate intake. However, the prevention effect of FA supplementation is mainly significant in countries with the mandatory fortification of food with FA, and some NTDs are not preventable by FA supplementation [32].

In China, no mandatory folate fortification of food is performed. Dietary intake of folate may reduce the risk of NTDs and weaken the prevention effects of FA [33]. South China has a wider variety of foods and a better economic level than North China. Together with the disparity in dietary habits, pregnant women in South China are more likely to reach the effective threshold (25.5 nmol/L) for NTD prevention from their diet [34]. Previous studies have shown that the plasma folate levels in South China are higher than those in North (25.9 nmol/L vs. 13.3 nmol/L) [35]. Therefore, FA may be more effective in women in North China than in those in South China [31]. This may be the main reason for the null association found in the present study since only 18.8% of the subjects were from the northern region. In addition, as we recruited pregnant women mainly from tertiary care hospitals, the sample had a high proportion (76.8%) of women with an education level higher than high school. These women might also not have significant benefits from FA supplementation [36]. The sensitivity of different NTD types [31], and the small number of NTD cases due to inadequate sample size in the current study may also have contributed to the null association.

Although there are controversial correlations, the majority of evidence supports the conclusion that the FA use is associated with a decreased risk of heart defects [37]. In a recent study, the causal association between periconception RBC folate levels and heart desease in offspring was verified by the Mendelian randomization method [38]. In the Hungarian study, Czeizel contributed the unexpected reduction of birth defects to the preventative effect of FA supplementation against cardiovascular anomalies [5]. In this study, similar reduction risks of heart defects and total malformations were observed for some variants of FA supplementations. The mechanism remains poorly understood. Maternal FA supplementation may be involved in the intrauterine growth and development of the foetal heart through its effect on the methylation of genes associated with heart defects (e.g. the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), axis inhibitor 1 (AXIN1), and T-Box transcription factor 20 (TBX20) genes) [39].

In the current study, specific characteristics were found for the preventative effect of FA against heart defects. Compared with women who initiated FA after conception, the protection was similar for women who started FA within 3 months of conception. The optimal initiation time for the prevention of heart defects was 1 month earlier than that for the other malformations. This was consistent with the pooled result showing that long-term prepregnancy FA supplementation had the highest protection effect of heart defects [40].

Foetal heart development is sensitive to preconceptional medicine exposure, and higher target RBC folate levels are needed for heart defect prevention [38]. Serum plasma plateaued after 12 weeks of supplementation but RBC folate levels did not by the end of 24 weeks [41]. FA attenuates the increased heart defect risk induced by FA antagonists [42] and may reduce the teratogenic harm of high fever [43, 44]. In the current study, FA showed a protective effect against congenital malformations among women who had early pregnancy conditions but not for those with a healthy pregnancy. Therefore, an earlier initiation of FA supplementation may help to counteract the harms of prepregnancy exposure, protect against cardiovascular teratogenic effects and better achieve a higher and more effective RBC folate level. Further studies on reasons for this protection are warranted.

We identified that pregnant women who started FA supplementation 1.5 months before conception and had a 4-month duration had the best preventive effect against congenital malformations. This is in line with the results in a previous study [13]. In that study, compared with women who started FA 4–8 weeks after their last menstrual period, women who initiated FA supplementation 6 weeks before conception and who maintained it for 18 weeks (calculation from 4–8 weeks before pregnancy until the average gestation of 12.1 weeks at the first visit) had higher serum and RBC folate levels and a higher proportion of reaching an effective RBC folate level of > 906 nmol/L. Although the options for the initiation and duration varied, the optimal ending time of the supplementation was consistent, anchored at 10.7 to 11.1 weeks of gestation. This ending time of supplementation is convincing since the stage covers the most sensitive period of organogenesis in foetal development (e.g. between the 3rd and 8th week of gestation) [5, 45].

Clinical implications of the findings

FA supplementation is a routine measure for the prevention of malformations in women of childbearing age in China [46, 47]. In contrast, the potential harms of FA are of high concern [3]. Excessive FA supplementation is associated with an increased risk of asthma and congenital malformations and might affect the long-term health outcomes of offspring [14, 15, 48]. Therefore, the initiation and duration of supplementation is critical for clinical practice in the context of cost–benefit balance and intervention safety. Our findings provide evidence for guiding the prescription of FA in obstetrics clinical practice and for improving the guidelines of FA supplementation. To better prevent congenital malformations, clinicians should evaluate the risk of malformations and promptly prescribe FA supplementation for women of childbearing age. Since prenatal care usually begins after the 7th week of gestation, a feasible measure is to advise women to supplement FA for 1 month before starting to prepare for pregnancy.

An optimal duration of the FA supplementation is the key to achieve an effective level of RBC folate for the prevention of congenital malformations and to prevent the potential harms of excessive supplementations. We first identified the optimal option through quantitative analyses. This finding also presented economic significance for vulnerable women who are sensitive to the affordability of FA. Finally, the reasons for the disparity in the initiation time and duration between heart defects and the other malformations remain unknown. We could predict that the effective RBC folate level for the prevention of heart defects is approximately 1200 nmol/L, which is the level after 20 weeks of supplementation (equal to a duration of 4.7 months) of 400 µg [44].

Strengths and limitations

Observation studies are the first choice in assessing the protective effect of FA [3]. In this multicentre prospective study, we accurately measured details of FA supplementation, prospectively and extensively collected data on congenital malformations, and assessed causality after controlling for many possible confounders. These merits ensure the accuracy and authenticity of the association. The large sample size provided statistical power to detect specific associations of variants of FA supplementation with the risk of congenital malformations.

There were some limitations in the present study. First, pregnant women were recruited at tertiary hospitals. The sample might have a better socialeconomic status [12]. These women might have better awareness and other factors that might be associated with the risk of malformations. In addition, the number of heart defects used to fit the initiation and duration of FA supplementation and the predicted probability was small and could therefore slightly affect the optimal values and their ranges. Thus, estimations of the effect of FA supplementation in preventing congenital malformations might be performed with caution and further studies with large sample sizes are warranted. Second, the 252 women whose details of FA supplementation were not available were considered to meet the definition and were included in the assessment of the association between FA and congenital malformations, which may have had an extremely slight effect on the results. Third, we were unable to further compare the preventive effect between the two doses (0.4 vs. 0.8 mg) since the data were not available. Finally, FA use was confirmed through medical records. The non-standardised medical records might lead to potential errors in the estimation of FA use among hospitals. In addition, although the regular intake rates were high (83.3 ~ 94.6%) in women who received FA [46, 49], we acknowledged that there might be different compliance of pill intake among the participants, thus inducing potential classification bias.

Conclusions

The timely post-conceptional supplementation of 0.4 or 0.8 mg FA was associated with a lower risk of congenital malformations, mainly contributing to its protection against heart defects. Women who initiated FA supplementation 1.5 months before pregnancy and maintained it for 4 months had the best protective effect. An earlier initiation of FA supplementation is recommended for the prevention of heart defects. These findings provide evidence for guiding the prescription of FA in obstetrics clinical practice and for improving guidelines in balancing the cost–benefit and avoiding potential harms of excessive FA.

Availability of data and materials

The data collected for the current study would be shared by contacting the corresponding author (JNW, wjnhmm@126.com) with reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AXIN1:

Axis inhibitor 1

CI:

Confidence interval

FA:

Folic acid

MTHFR:

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase

NTD:

Neural tube defect

OR:

Odds ratio

RBC:

Red blood cell

TBX20:

T-Box transcription factor 20

References

  1. Sarmah S, Muralidharan P, Marrs JA. Common congenital anomalies: environmental causes and prevention with folic acid containing multivitamins. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2016;108:274–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Christianson AL, Howson CP, Modell B. March of dimes global report on birth defects. The hidden toll of dying and disabled children. White Plains, New York. 2006. http://www.marchofdimes.org/materials/global-report-on-birth-defectsthe-hidden-toll-of-dying-and-disabled-children-executive-summary.pdf

  3. Viswanathan M, Treiman KA, Kish-Doto J, Middleton JC, Coker-Schwimmer EJ, Nicholson WK. Folic acid supplementation for the prevention of neural tube defects: an updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Tak Force. JAMA. 2017;317(2):190–203.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng Z, Gu R, Lian Z, Gu HF. Evaluation of the association between maternal folic acid supplementation and the risk of congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr J. 2022;21(1):20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Czeizel AE. Periconceptional folic acid and multivitamin supplementation for the prevention of neural tube defects and other congenital abnormalities. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2009;85:260–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolf HT, Hegaard HK, Huusom LD, Pinborg AB. Multivitamin use and adverse birth outcomes in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(4):404.e1-404.e30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Centers for Disease Control. Recommendations for the use of folic acid to reduce the number of cases of spina bifida and other neural tube defects. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1992;41(RR-14):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organization. Periconceptional Folic Acid Supplementation to Prevent Neural Tube Defects. 2017. http://www.who.int/elena/titles/folate_periconceptional/en/.

  9. Guideline for the prevention of neural tube defects by periconceptional folic acid supplementation (2017). The Folic Acid Supplementation Working Group, Birth Defects Prevention and Molecular Genetics Branch, China Maternal and Child Health Association. Chin J Reprod Health. 2017;28(5):401–10.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crider KS, Devine O, Hao L, et al. Population of red blood cell folate concentration for prevention of neural tube defects: Bayesian medel. BMJ. 2014;349:g4554.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hurthouse NA, Gray AR, Miller JC, et al. Folate status of reproductive age women and neural tube defect risk- the effect of long term folic acid supplementation at dose of 140 ug and 400 ug per day. Nutrients. 2011;3:49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wu JN, Pérez-López FR, Peng T, Xie F, Li MQ. Association of early pregnancy free and total triiodothyronine with subsequent risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Endocr Pract. 2023;29(1):40–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cawley S, McCartney D, Woodside JV, et al. Optimization of folic acid supplementation in the prevention of neural tube defects. J Public Health (Oxf). 2018;40(4):827–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chu S, Zhang J. Periconceptional folic acid supplementation is a risk factor for childhood asthma: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):220.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Su J, Gao S, Yan R, et al. Is the tradeoff between folic acid or/and multivitamin supplementation against birth defects in early pregnancy reconsidered? Evidence based on a Chinese birth cohort study. Nutrients. 2023;15(2):279.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ballestin SS, Campos MIG, Ballestin JB, Bartolome MJL. Is supplementation with micronutrients still necessary during pregnancy? A review. Nutrients. 2021;13(9):3134.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ji CY, Jiang XL, Yin LL, et al. Relationship between fetal ultrasonic soft markers and adverse pregnancy outcomes during the first trimester. Chin J Ultrasonogr. 2022;31(8):717–23.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yang M, Fan XB, Wu JN, Wang JM. Association of assisted reproductive technology and multiple pregnancies with the risks of birth defects and stillbirth: a retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):8296.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1803–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Luteijn JM, Brown MJ, Dolk H. Influenza and congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(4):809–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Seo GH, Kim TH, Chung JH. Antothyroid drugs and congenital malformations: a nationwide Korean cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168(6):405–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Feng Y, Yu D, Chen T, et al. Maternal parity and the risk of congenital heart defects in offspring: a dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiological observational studies. Plos One. 2014;9(10):e108944.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Goetzinger KR, Shanks AL, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Advanced maternal age and the risk of major congenital anomalies. Am J Perinatol. 2017;34(3):217–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Smithells RW, Sheppard S, Schorah CJ, et al. Possible prevention of neural tube defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation. Lancet. 1980;315:339–40.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Czeizel AE, Dudas I. Prevention of the first occurrence of neural tube defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(26):1832–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Milunsky A, Jick H, Jick SS, et al. Multivitamin/folic acid supplementation in early pregnancy reduces the prevalence of neural tube defects. JAMA. 1989;262(20):2847–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Agopian AJ, Tinker SC, Lupo PJ, Canfield MA, Mitchell LE. National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Proportion of neural tube defects attributable to known risk factors. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2013;97(1):42–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Hernandez-Diaz S, Werler MM, Walker AM, Mitchell AA. Neural tube defects in relation to use of folic acid antagonists during pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153(10):961–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mulinare J, Cordero JF, Erickson JD, Berry RJ. Periconceptional use of multivitamins and the occurrence of neural tube defects. JAMA. 1988;260(21):3141–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Berry RJ, Li Z, Erickson JD. Prevention of neural tube defects with folic acid in China. China-US Collaborative Project for Neural Tube Defect Prevention. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1485–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou Y, Crider KS, Yeung LF, et al. Periconceptional folic acid use prevents both rare and common neural tube defects in China. Birth Defects Res. 2022;114(5–6):184–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nikolopoulou E, Galea GL, Rolo A, et al. Neural tube closure: cellular, molecular and biomechanical mechanisms. Development. 2017;144(4):552–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Werler MM, Shapiro S, Mitchell AA. Periconceptional folic acid exposure and risk of occurrent neural tube defects. JAMA. 1993;269(10):1257–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen MY, Rose CE, Qi YP, et al. Defining the plasma folate concentration associated with the red blood cell folate concentration threshold for optimal neural tube defects prevention: a population-based, randomized trial of folic acid supplementation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109(5):1452–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhao Y, Hao L, Zhang L, et al. Plasma folate status and dietary folate intake among Chinese women of childbearing age. Matern Child Nutr. 2009;5(2):104–16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Shaw GM, Schaffer D, Velie EM, Morland K, Harris JA. Periconceptional vitamin use, dietary folate, and the occurrence of neural tube defects. Epidemiology. 1995;6(3):219–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bailey LB, Berry RJ. Folic acid supplementation and the occurrence of congenital heart defects, orofacial clefts, multiple births, and miscarriage. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81(suppl):1213S-S1217.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen H, Zhang Y, Wang D, et al. Periconception red blood cell folate and offspring congenital heart disease: nested case-control and Mendelian randomization studies. Ann Intern Med. 2022;175(9):1212–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. González-Peña SM, Calvo-Anguiano G, Martínez-de-Villarreal LE, et al. Maternal folic acid intake and methylation status of genes associated with ventricular septal defects in children case-control study. Nutrients. 2021;13(6):2071.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Cheng Z, Gu R, Lian Z, et al. Evaluation of the association between maternal folic acid supplementation and the risk of congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr J. 2022;21:20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Lamers Y, Prinz-Langenohl R, Brämswig S, et al. Red blood cell folate concentrations increase more after supplementation with [6S]-5-methyltetrahydrofolate than with folic acid in women of childbearing age. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84:156–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hernandez-Diaz S, Werler MM, Walker AM, Mitchell AA. Folic acid antagonists during pregnancy and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1608–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Acs N, Banhidy F, Puho E, Czeizel AE. Maternal influenza during pregnancy and risk of congenital abnormalities on offspring. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2005;73:989–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Botto LD, Erickson JD, Mulinare J, et al. Maternal fever, multivitamin use, and selected birth defects: evidence of interaction? Epidemiology. 2002;13:485–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wiebrecht A, Gaus W, Becker S, Hummelsberger J, Kuhimann. Safety aspects of Chinese herbal medicine in pregnancy re-evaluation of experimental data of two animal studies and the clinical experience. Complement Ther Med. 2014;22:954–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen J, Zhang SK, Wang QM, et al. Investigation on folic acid supplementation status among Chinese women in the first trimester of pregnancy. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016;96(15):1215–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang J, Jin L, Wang D, et al. Maternal periconceptional folic acid supplements use and fetus risk for limb defects. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2021;35:645–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Plumptre L, Masih SP, Ly A, et al. High concentrations of folate and unmetabolized folic acid in a cohort of pregnant Canadian women and umbilical cord blood. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102(4):848–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Jin R, Qu Y, Li J, Ma S, Ma L, Jiang Y. Current status of folic acid supplementation in women at child-bearing age in suburban area of Beijing. Chin J Epidemiol. 2017;38(10):1347–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants of the study. We appreciate Prof. Faustino R. Pérez-López from Aragón Health Research Institute for his language editing on the manuscript. We appreciate collaborators of this study: Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University (Jiang-Nan Wu, Ting Peng, Jing Dong); The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Xue-Dong Deng, Lin-Liang Yin, Chun-Ya Ji, Zhong Yang, Qi Pan); Suzhou Wuzhong People’s Hospital (Gui-Hua Wu); Chengdu Women and Children's Central Hospital (Liu-Ying Zhou); Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital (Mei Li); Nanjing Gaochun People's Hospital (Yue-Qin Chen); Sichuan Maternal and Child Health Hospital (Jia-Xiang Yang); Nanjing Pukou District Central Hospital (Bai-Song Liang); Nanjing Gulou Hospital (Tong Ru); Dalian Maternal and Child Health Hospital (Chun-Li Jing); Qinghai Red Cross Hospital (Weng-Rong Zhou); Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Li Cao); Taizhou People's Hospital (Qin Li); Baotou Central Hospital (Gui-Ping Li); West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University (Tai-Zhu Yang); Northwest Women and Children's Hospital (Xin-Ru Gao); Shanxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital (Li-Ling Shi); Shanghai Changning Maternal and Child hospital (Yu-Qing Zhou); General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University (Xue-Qin Ji); The affiliated Hospital of Nantong University (Bo Liang); Taiyuan Maternal and Child Health Hospital (Qing Han); The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical College (Ling Ren); Lianyungang Maternal and Child Health Hospital (Wen-Rong Wang); and Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Guo-Wei Tao).

Funding

This work was supported by Suzhou Gusu Health Talents Program (GSWS2019006, GSWS2020055); Jiangsu Provincial Maternal and Child Health Scientific Project (F202044); Suzhou Rejuvenating Health through Science and Education Youth Science Project (KJXW2021032); Scientific Program from Gusu School Nanjing Medical University (GSKY20210232); and company General Electric.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jing Dong, Lin-Liang Yin, and Xue-Dong Deng contribute equally and are co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Center of Diagnosis and Treatment for Cervical Disease, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China

    Jing Dong

  2. Center for Medical Ultrasound, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, 215006, China

    Lin-Liang Yin, Xue-Dong Deng, Chun-Ya Ji, Qi Pan & Zhong Yang

  3. Department of Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China

    Ting Peng

  4. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China

    Jiang-Nan Wu

Authors
  1. Jing Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lin-Liang Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xue-Dong Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chun-Ya Ji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qi Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhong Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ting Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jiang-Nan Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

for the Early Pregnancy Ultrasound Screening, Maternal Exposures and Congenital Malformation Risk collaborators

  • Jiang-Nan Wu
  • , Ting Peng
  • , Jing Dong
  • , Xue-Dong Deng
  • , Lin-Liang Yin
  • , Chun-Ya Ji
  • , Zhong Yang
  • , Qi Pan
  • , Gui-Hua Wu
  • , Liu-Ying Zhou
  • , Mei Li
  • , Yue-Qin Chen
  • , Jia-Xiang Yang
  • , Bai-Song Liang
  • , Tong Ru
  • , Chun-Li Jing
  • , Weng-Rong Zhou
  • , Li Cao
  • , Qin Li
  • , Gui-Ping Li
  • , Tai-Zhu Yang
  • , Xin-Ru Gao
  • , Li-Ling Shi
  • , Yu-Qing Zhou
  • , Xue-Qin Ji
  • , Bo Liang
  • , Qing Han
  • , Ling Ren
  • , Wen-Rong Wang
  •  & Guo-Wei Tao

Contributions

JD: conceptualization and writing-original draft. LLY and XDD: investigation, writing-review and editing, data curation, and supervision. CYJ, QP, and ZY: investigation and data curation. TP: conceptualization, writing-review and editing. JNW: conceptualization, investigation, writing-original draft, data curation, writing-review and editing, supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ting Peng or Jiang-Nan Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was registered at www.chictr.org.cn on March 25, 2017 (ChiCTR-SOC-17010976). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Suzhou Municipal Hospital (K2016038). Written informed consent was obtained for recruitment.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1. 

General characteristics between included and excluded women. Table S2. Incidence of organ congenital malformations and its association with folic acid supplementation. Table S3. Sensitivity analyses for the association between folic acid and congenital malformations. Table S4. The association between folic acid supplement and congenital malformations according to history of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Table S5. The association between variants of folic acid supplementation and congenital malformations according to medicine exposure. Table S6. The association between folic acid supplementation and congenital malformations according to parity. Table S7. The association between folic acid supplementation and congenital malformations according to maternal age. Table S8. The association between folic acid supplementation and congenital malformations according to early pregnant conditions. Table S9. Pre-conception initiation of folic acid supplementation and congenital malformations. Table S10. Folic acid supplementation and risk of congenital malformations in women who started the supplementation earlier than three months before pregnancy. Table S11.  Folic acid supplementation and risk of congenital malformations in women who started the supplementation within three months before pregnancy. Table S12. Details of the fit curves between initiation and duration of folic acid supplementation and malformation risk. Table S13. Sensitivity analyses for the association between folic acid supplementation and risk of heart defects.

Additional file 2: Figure S1.

Combinations of initiation and duration of folic acidsupplementation with the predicted probability of congenital malformations. Figure S2. Combinations of initiation and duration of folic acid with the predicted probability of heart defects and the other malformations. Figure S3. Predictive probability of heart defects and the other malformations by the initiation of folic acid supplementation. Figure S4. Predictive probability of heart defects and the other malformations by the duration of folic acid supplementation. 

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dong, J., Yin, LL., Deng, XD. et al. Initiation and duration of folic acid supplementation in preventing congenital malformations. BMC Med 21, 292 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-03000-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-03000-8

Keywords

BMC Medicine

ISSN: 1741-7015

Contact us