Skip to main content
  • Correspondence
  • Open access
  • Published:

Importance of accurate and accessible recording of healthcare contacts in mental health

A Correspondence to this article was published on 11 September 2023

The Original Article was published on 30 April 2020

Peer Review reports

Thank you for drawing our attention to the correspondence article by Taxiarchi et al. [1]. Our original study [2] used linked primary care electronic health records (QResearch) and secondary care data (Hospital Episode Statistics) to assess whether there were records of children and young people (CYP) visiting NHS-funded paediatric or psychiatric specialists in secondary care within the 12 months before or up to 6 months after their first primary care antidepressant prescription.

Taxiarchi et al.’s [1] work looks at a group of CYP in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) in a similar period who had a coded record in their primary care data of being “Seen in child and adolescent psychiatry clinic” or “Seen by child and adolescent psychiatrist” and identifies whether there was a relevant inpatient or outpatient hospital episode recorded in the 12 months before this. This estimates that 27.5% (or at most, 56.0% in a sensitivity analysis looking at 24 months before the primary care record) of those with a CPRD record of having seen a child and adolescent psychiatrist had a corresponding HES record. We highlighted the limitation in our paper that it was “possible that we did not capture all interactions with specialists” [2], and Taxiarchi et al.’s [1] work may point to the extent of contact with the private sector, which is not included in HES data.

These studies are looking at different outcomes for different populations in different datasets, but both highlight the importance of accurate and accessible recording of healthcare contacts in order to describe and quantify healthcare utilisation. In response to the commentary article published at the time [3], we highlighted the information gap that exists when trying to assess issues around mental health care, in particular for children and adolescents [4]. When the Mental Health Services Dataset (MHSDS) was available as linked data to CPRD, it did not contain information from Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) [5].

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Taxiarchi VP, Chew-Graham CA, Pierce M. Substantially more children receiving antidepressants see a specialist than reported by Jack et al. BMC Med. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-03043-x.

  2. Jack RH, Joseph RM, Coupland C. et al. Secondary care specialist visits made by children and young people prescribed antidepressants in primary care: a descriptive study using the QResearch database. BMC Med. 2020;18,93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01560-7.

  3. Walkup JT, Strawn JR. High-quality antidepressant prescribing: please consider whether “perfection is the enemy of progress.” BMC Med. 2020;18:150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01621-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Joseph RM, Jack RH, Hollis C, Coupland C. High-quality antidepressant prescribing in children and young people: value of observational research. 2020. https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4992928. Accessed 16 Aug 2023.

  5. Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Mental Health Data Set and CPRD primary care data Documentation (set 18). 2019. https://cprd.com/sites/default/files/2022-02/Documentation_MHDS_set18_v1.4.pdf. Accessed 16 Aug 2023.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The original work was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and conducted by the NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre. RM is supported by the NIHR MindTech MedTech and in Vitro Fertilisation Collaboration and the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands. AC is supported by the NIHR Oxford Cognitive Health Clinical Research Facility, by an NIHR Research Professorship (grant RP-2017–08-ST2-006), and by the NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre (grant NIHR203316). The views represented are the views of the authors alone and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Health in England, NHS, or the National Institute for Health Research.

The funder had no role in the original design, analysis, and interpretation of the data or in writing either manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RHJ wrote the original draft, with all other authors reviewing and editing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth H. Jack.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

CH was the chair of the NICE guideline for psychosis in children and young people (CG155) and a member of the NICE ADHD Guideline update committee (NG87).

SC has received honoraria for talks/lectures from the Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health (ACAMH), British Association of Psychopharmacology (BAP), Canadian ADHD Alliance Resource (CADDRA), and Healthcare Convention.

AC has received research, educational and consultancy fees from INCiPiT (Italian Network for Paediatric Trials), CARIPLO Foundation, Lundbeck, and Angelini Pharma.

JHC is a professor of clinical epidemiology and general practice at the University of Oxford and co-director of QResearch®—a not-for-profit organisation which is a joint partnership between the University of Oxford and Egton Medical Information Systems (the leading commercial supplier of IT for 60% of general practices in the UK). JHC was also a paid director of ClinRisk Ltd. which produces open and closed source software to ensure the reliable and updatable implementation of clinical risk equations within clinical computer systems to help improve patient care.

RHJ, CACC, RMJ, RM, and RDK declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jack, R.H., Coupland, C.A.C., Joseph, R.M. et al. Importance of accurate and accessible recording of healthcare contacts in mental health. BMC Med 21, 346 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-03044-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-03044-w

Keywords