Skip to main content
Download PDF

Sleep and liver function biomarkers in relation to risk of incident liver cancer: a nationwide prospective cohort study

BMC Medicine volume 22, Article number: 261 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

To assess the largely undetermined separate and joint effects of sleep and liver function biomarkers on liver cancer.

Methods

Data of 356,894 participants without cancer at baseline in the UK Biobank were analyzed. Sleep score was evaluated using five sleep traits (sleep duration, chronotype, insomnia, snoring, and excessive daytime sleepiness) and dichotomized into healthy or unhealthy sleep. Circulating liver function biomarkers were measured. Cox proportional hazard model was performed to investigate the independent and joint associations of sleep and liver function biomarkers with liver cancer incidence.

Results

After a median follow-up time of 13.1 years, 394 cases of incident liver cancer were documented. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for liver cancer was 1.46 (95% confidence interval: 1.15–1.85) associated with unhealthy sleep (vs. healthy sleep), and was 1.17 (1.15–1.20), 1.20 (1.18–1.22), 1.69 (1.47–1.93), 1.06 (1.06–1.07), 1.08 (1.07–1.09), 1.81 (1.37–2.39), or 0.29 (0.18–0.46) associated with each 10-unit increase in alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total protein (TP), or albumin (ALB), respectively. Individuals with unhealthy sleep and high (≥ median) ALT, AST, TBIL, GGT, ALP, or TP or low (< median) ALB level had the highest HR of 3.65 (2.43–5.48), 4.03 (2.69–6.03), 1.97 (1.40–2.77), 4.69 (2.98–7.37), 2.51 (1.75–3.59), 2.09 (1.51–2.89), or 2.22 (1.55–3.17) for liver cancer, respectively. Significant additive interaction of unhealthy sleep with high TP level on liver cancer was observed with relative excess risk due to an interaction of 0.80 (0.19–1.41).

Conclusions

Unhealthy sleep was associated with an increased risk of liver cancer, especially in participants with lower ALB levels or higher levels of ALT, AST, TBIL, GGT, ALP, or particularly TP.

Peer Review reports

Background

Liver cancer ranks as the seventh most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer-related death [1]. In 2020, there were 905,700 new cases and 830,200 deaths from liver cancer globally. Furthermore, the incidence and mortality of liver cancer are predicted to increase by over 55% by 2040 [2]. Unhealthy lifestyle factors, such as weight gain, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, physical inactivity, and unhealthy dietary patterns, have been associated with increased liver cancer risk [3,4,5,6]. Sleep is a crucial aspect of lifestyle and a healthy sleep is essential for physical and mental health [7]. Unhealthy sleep patterns, such as unfavorable sleep duration, snoring, and insomnia, have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality from lung, colorectal, and all-caused cancer [8,9,10,11,12,13]. For instance, a prospective study of 469,691 individuals in the UK Biobank indicated that unfavorable sleep duration and evening chronotype were associated with an increased risk of lung cancer [8]. In addition, Song et al. investigated the association between sleep quality and incident all-caused cancer risk based on 10,036 participants from an elderly cohort and found that poor sleep quality was positively associated with the long-term risk of developing cancer [10]. Although these studies provided considerable insight that unhealthy sleep could increase the risk of cancer, evidence concerning the liver cancer risk from sleep remains absent.

Liver function biomarkers, such as alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), albumin (ALB), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total bilirubin (TBIL), and total protein (TP), are critical indicators of liver biosynthesis, metabolism, detoxification, as well as overall nutritional and immune status [14]. These markers are usually included in routine blood tests and are widely used to assess liver health and liver cancer risk [15, 16]. Based on 235 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and 259 healthy controls with negative alpha-fetoprotein, Li and colleagues found that GGT/ALP combined with GGT/ALT and ALT/AST were effective diagnostic markers of alpha-fetoprotein-negative HCC, especially in patients with normal liver function or early stage [17]. Another clinical study of 414 HCC patients in Anhui, China, aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of serum AST/ALT and GGT levels revealed that ALT, AST, and GGT were potential indicators of liver cancer progression [18]. Nevertheless, these studies were somewhat restricted by small-sized/unrepresentative samples or ultimate liver cancer mortality outcomes. Therefore, it is essential to investigate the relationships between the liver function biomarkers and the risk of incident liver cancer in the general population with a large sample size.

In the current study, we conducted systematic analyses based on the UK Biobank, a nationwide large-scale general population-based prospective cohort, to investigate the relationships of sleep traits and comprehensive sleep score with the risk of incident liver cancer. Potential associations between liver function biomarkers and the risk of incident liver cancer were also evaluated. Furthermore, we examined the joint associations of sleep and liver function biomarkers with the risk of incident liver cancer and assessed the potential additive interactions.

Methods

Study participants

The UK Biobank is a prospective cohort with over 500,000 participants of adults aged 37 ~ 73 years old recruited from 22 centers across the UK between 2006 and 2010 (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/media/gnkeyh2q/study-rationale.pdf). Participants completed questionnaires, interviews, and physical measurements at baseline assessments. Blood samples were collected from all participants at recruitment for detecting circulating biomarkers. All participants consented to the use of their de-identified data and access to their national health-related hospital and death records. Detailed study design and methods of the cohort were described elsewhere [19].

We excluded participants with prevalent cancer at recruitment (n = 45,782); missing data on any of the five sleep traits (n = 41,130); or missing data on any of the seven liver function biomarkers (n = 58,505). Eventually, a total of 356,894 participants were included in our analysis. A detailed study design and workflow of this study is displayed in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of the study design and workflow. Abbreviations: ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase; TBIL, total bilirubin; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; TP, total protein; ALB, albumin

Full size image

Definition of sleep trait and sleep score

All sleep traits were collected through a touchscreen questionnaire. A sleep score was created by combining five independent sleep traits including sleep duration, morning/evening chronotype, insomnia, snoring, and excessive daytime sleepiness [20, 21]. Online supplemental Additional file 1: Table S1 provides a detailed questionnaire and definition of each item. Healthy sleep traits were defined as favorable sleep duration (sleep 7 ~ 8 h/day); morning chronotype (“morning” person or more a “morning” than an “evening” person); no usual insomnia (“never/rarely” or “sometimes”); no snoring; and no dozing (“never/rarely” or “sometimes”). Each of the independent sleep traits was coded 1 if meeting the healthy criterion and 0 if not. The sleep score was obtained by summing up the 5 independent sleep traits, and all participants were subsequently categorized into two sleep groups accordingly: “healthy sleep” (sleep score ≥ 4) and “unhealthy sleep” (sleep score 0 ~ 3) [20,21,22].

Blood collection and laboratory methods

Blood samples were collected from all participants at recruitment, then labeled, centrifuged, and stored at – 80 ℃. Circulating levels of ALT, AST, GGT, and ALP were determined using the enzymatic rate method (Beckman Coulter AU5800); TBIL, TP, and ALB were determined using the colorimetric method; and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) was determined using the immuno-turbidimetric method. A detailed introduction of the assay performance has been published elsewhere [23]. The average within-laboratory coefficients of variation in quality-control samples for ALT, AST, TBIL, GGT, ALP, TP, ALB, and CRP ranged from 1.16 ~ 2.91%, 1.33 ~ 2.13%, 1.48 ~ 1.92%, 1.44 ~ 2.84%, 2.84 ~ 3.08%, 1.09 ~ 1.22%, 2.09 ~ 2.20%, and 1.69 ~ 2.31%, respectively [23].

According to the published literature, the reproducibilities of all liver biomarkers in the subsample of participants with repeat measurements were fair to good (intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.40 ~ 0.74) or excellent (intraclass correlation coefficients: ≥ 0.75) in the UK Biobank [16, 24]. Therefore, the concentration of liver function biomarkers at baseline were justifiably used for analysis in this study in accordance with previous studies [25, 26].

Assessment of outcome

Incidence of liver cancer was collected until July 19, 2022. The identification of cancer cases in the UK Biobank cohort was carried out by connecting with the national cancer registries of England, Wales, and Scotland. All diseases were confirmed according to the 10th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), and liver cancer was defined as ICD-10 code C22 [2]. Participants were followed up from the enrollment until the time of liver cancer diagnosis or censoring. Censoring was defined as the time of death, withdrawal from the study, or the end of follow-up, whichever came first.

Covariates

To reduce the effect of potential confounding, demographics and contextual covariates were selected based on published literature and statistic consideration [6, 22, 27, 28], including age at recruitment (continuous), sex (male/female), ethnicity (White/others), body mass index (BMI; continuous), smoking status (never/former/current), alcohol consumption (never or seldom/1 ~ 4 times per week/almost daily), healthy diet (yes/no; healthy diet takes 10 diet components [fruits, vegetables, fish, dairy, vegetable oils, processed meats, unprocessed meats, whole grains, refined grains, and sugar-sweetened beverages] into account) [29], physical activity (low/moderate/high) [30], any treatment/medication taken (never/ever), Townsend deprivation index (indicative of socioeconomic status; continuous), family history of cancer (yes/no), and CRP (continuous).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were presented and stratified by the participants with or without incident liver cancer. T-test/chi-squared test was used to compare the differences in demographic characteristics and levels of liver function biomarkers between participants with and without incident liver cancer for continuous/categorical variables. Spearman’s correlation analysis was used to estimate the correlation between liver function biomarkers.

Cox proportional hazard model was performed to assess the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the risk of incident liver cancer associated with sleep score and independent sleep traits, whereas the model 1 was a crude model; the model 2 was adjusted for age (continuous), sex (male/female), ethnicity (White/others), BMI (continuous), smoking status (never/former/current), alcohol consumption (never or seldom/1 ~ 4 times per week/almost daily), healthy diet (yes/no), and physical activity (low/moderate/high); and the model 3 was further adjusted for any treatment/medication taken (never/ever), Townsend deprivation index (continuous), family history of cancer (yes/no), and CRP (continuous) based on model 2. The Kaplan–Meier curves of the cumulative risks and event rates were also presented along with the corresponding HR and 95% CI. We further investigated the association of sleep duration with the risk of incident liver cancer across different sleep durations with the favorable sleep duration (7 ~ 8 h) serving as a reference group [8, 20].

Associations of liver function biomarkers with the risk of liver cancer incidence were estimated by Cox proportional hazard models with adjustment for confounders mentioned above. We also estimated the HR (95% CI) of liver cancer incidence risk for the second (25th ~ 50th percentile), third (50th ~ 75th percentile), and fourth (the highest; ≥ 75th percentile) quartiles of these liver function biomarkers compared to the first (the lowest; < 25th percentile) quartile. Restricted cubic spline regression was used to investigate the dose–response relationships between liver function biomarkers and the risk of incident liver cancer. In addition, stratified analyses were conducted according to several major characteristics, including age at recruitment (< 60/ ≥ 60 years), sex (male/female), ethnicity (White/others), BMI (< 25/ ≥ 25 kg/m2), smoking status (never/former/current), and alcohol consumption (never or seldom/1 ~ 4 times per week/almost daily). The modification effect was estimated by adding a product term of liver function biomarker and stratified variable into the statistic model.

To examine the robustness of the associations between sleep or liver function biomarkers and incident liver cancer, we performed sensitivity analysis by (1) excluding incident liver cancer in the first 2 years of follow-up (to minimize the possibility of reverse causality); (2) excluding individuals with liver disease at baseline; (3) additionally adjusting for the liver function biomarkers, which were included as categorical variables rather than continuous variables to avoid collinearity, when assessing the association between sleep and incident liver cancer; (4) additionally adjusting for sleep score (healthy/unhealthy) and the other liver function biomarkers when assessing the association between one liver function biomarker and incident liver cancer; (5) performing inverse probability weighting (IPW) analysis to account for missing data and avoid potential selection bias; and (6) conducting competing risk model to account for mortality.

To investigate the joint associations of sleep and liver function biomarkers with liver cancer incidence risk, all participants were divided into four groups based on sleep score (healthy sleep: sleep score ≥ 4; unhealthy sleep: sleep score 0 ~ 3) and liver function biomarker levels (high: ≥ median concentration; low: < median concentration). We evaluated the HR (95% CI) of liver cancer incidence risk in the other three groups, using participants with healthy sleep and whose liver function biomarker levels tended to be at a lower risk of liver cancer incidence as the reference group. The additive interaction was assessed by using two indexes: relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) and attributable proportion due to interaction (AP), and the 95% CIs of RERI and AP include 0 indicating no additive interaction [31].

Schoenfeld residuals were used to test the proportional hazard assumption and no violation was found. All analyses were performed in R software, version 4.2.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing). All statistical tests were two-sided, and P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Cox regression was performed using the R package survival, and additive interaction was estimated using the R package epiR.

Results

Characteristics of study participants

Demographic characteristics of participants included in the study are displayed in Table 1. After a median follow-up time of 13.1 years, 394 cases of incident liver cancer (168 in men and 280 in women) were documented. Compared with participants without incident liver cancer, those with incident liver cancer had higher BMI levels, higher CRP levels, worse socioeconomic status, and less physical activity and were older, more likely to consume alcohol, and less likely to have never smoked or never taken any treatment/medication. Additionally, the proportion of the population with unhealthy sleep scores, unfavorable sleep duration, or insomnia was higher in participants with incident liver cancer compared to participants without incident liver cancer. Moreover, all liver function biomarkers at baseline were higher in incident liver cancer individuals except that ALB was lower. These liver function biomarkers were significantly correlated with each other (all P < 0.001) (Table 2).

Table 1 Demographic characteristics at baseline of participants included in the study (N = 356,894)
Full size table
Table 2 Basic statistics of liver function biomarkers and correlation matrix (N = 356,894)
Full size table

Association between sleep and liver cancer incidence

Table 3 presents the associations of sleep traits and sleep score with liver cancer incidence risk. Across all three models, an unhealthy sleep (vs. healthy sleep) was found to be associated with an increased risk of liver cancer incidence. The HR (95% CI) for liver cancer incidence was 1.35 (1.11, 1.64) for individuals with unhealthy sleep compared to those with healthy sleep (Model 1). The association did not appreciably change with adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, healthy diet, and physical activity (Model 2; HR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.14, 1.79), and with additional adjustment for any treatment/medication taken, Townsend deprivation index, family history of cancer, and C-reaction protein (Model 3; HR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.15, 1.85). Moreover, for a per 1-unit increase in sleep score, the multivariate-adjusted HR (95% CI) for incident liver cancer was 1.24 (1.11, 1.39) (Additional file 1: Table S2). For independent sleep trait, in the multivariable-adjusted model (Model 3), unfavorable sleep duration, insomnia, and snoring were each independently associated with 29% (HR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.65), 43% (HR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.83), and 30% (HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.67) increased risk of liver cancer incidence, respectively. Kaplan–Meier curves generally revealed similar results (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Furthermore, compared with the favorable sleep duration (7 ~ 8 h), sleep duration < 6 h or > 9 h was associated with 95% (Model 3; HR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.30, 2.93) or 77% (Model 3; HR = 1.77, 95% CI: 0.93, 3.38) increased risk of liver cancer incidence, respectively, revealing a U-shaped association between sleep duration and risk of liver cancer incidence (Additional file 1: Fig. S2).

Table 3 Association of sleep with the risk of incident liver cancer (N = 356,894)
Full size table

Associations between liver function biomarkers and liver cancer incidence

Circulating levels of liver function biomarkers were significantly and linearly (all P total < 0.001 and all P nonlinear > 0.1; Additional file 1: Fig. S3) associated with liver cancer incidence in dose–response manners (all P and P trend < 0.05) (Table 4). Compared with individuals with the lowest quartile (Q1) of liver function biomarkers, the HRs (95% CIs) of those in the highest quartile (Q4) were 3.25 (2.18, 4.84) for ALT, 3.55 (2.45, 5.15) for AST, 1.68 (1.18, 2.38) for TBIL, 5.17 (3.22, 8.32) for GGT, 2.12 (1.49, 3.00) for ALP, 2.13 (1.51, 3.01) for TP, and 0.66 (0.47, 0.94) for ALB. In the multivariable model with continuous liver function biomarkers, for each 10-unit increase in ALT, AST, TBIL, GGT, ALP, TP, or ALB, the risk of liver cancer incidence increased by 17% (HR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.15, 1.20), 20% (HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.18, 1.22), 69% (HR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.47, 1.93), 6% (HR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.07), 8% (HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.09), 82% (HR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.37, 2.39), or decreased by 71% (HR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.18, 0.46), respectively. Further stratified analysis showed that sex, BMI, smoking status, and alcohol consumption significantly modified the relationships of ALB, AST, ALT, and GGT with liver cancer incidence, respectively (P for modification < 0.05), while these relationships were persistently significant in the corresponding subgroups (Additional file 1: Table S3).

Table 4 Associations of liver function biomarkers with the risk of incident liver cancer (N = 356,894)
Full size table

Sensitivity analysis

As shown in the supplementary materials (Additional file 1: Table S4 ~ Table S13), the associations of sleep or liver function biomarkers with liver cancer incidence did not change apparently after excluding participants with incident liver cancer in the first 2 years of follow-up, excluding individuals with liver disease at baseline, conducting additional model adjustment, performing IPW analysis, or conducting competing risk model.

Joint associations of sleep and liver function biomarkers with liver cancer incidence

Joint associations of unhealthy sleep and liver function biomarkers with liver cancer incidence were observed (Fig. 2). Individuals with unhealthy sleep and high level of ALT (HR = 3.65, 95% CI: 2.43, 5.48), AST (HR = 4.03, 95% CI: 2.69, 6.03), TBIL (HR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.40, 2.77), GGT (HR = 4.69, 95% CI: 2.98, 7.37), ALP (HR = 2.51, 95% CI: 1.75, 3.59), or TP (HR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.51, 2.89) or low level of ALB (HR = 2.22, 95% CI:1.55, 3.17) were at the highest risk for liver cancer incidence compared with those with healthy sleep and low level of ALT, AST, TBIL, GGT, ALP, or TP or high level of ALB. Positive additive interaction of unhealthy sleep with high TP level was indicated by the significant RERI and AP. For unhealthy sleep with a high TP level, the RERI was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.19, 1.41), which suggested that there would be a 0.80 relative excess risk from the additive interaction, accounting for 38% (AP = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.64) of the risk of liver cancer incidence in individuals exposed to both unhealthy sleep and high TP level. Moreover, 30% (AP = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.005, 0.59) of the risk of liver cancer incidence was ascribed to the interaction of unhealthy sleep and high TBIL level.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Risk of incident liver cancer according to sleep and liver function biomarkers (N = 356,894). Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; RERI, relative excess risk due to the interaction; AP, attributable proportion due to the interaction; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase; TBIL, total bilirubin; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; TP, total protein; ALB, albumin. Median concentration was used as the cut-off concentration for high or low classification of the liver function biomarker. Models were adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, healthy diet, physical activity, any treatment/medication taken, Townsend deprivation index, family history of cancer, and CRP

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, we found that unhealthy sleep, particularly unfavorable sleep duration, insomnia, and snoring, was associated with an increased risk of liver cancer incidence. In addition, participants with higher levels of ALT, AST, TBIL, GGT, ALP, or TP or lower levels of ALB tend to have a higher risk of liver cancer incidence. The most substantial relative increase in the risk of liver cancer incidence was observed in individuals with unhealthy sleep and high levels of ALT, AST, TBIL, GGT, ALP, or TP or low levels of ALB. Furthermore, our study provided quantitative data regarding the additive interaction effect between unhealthy sleep and high TP levels on liver cancer incidence. Our findings contribute to the understanding of the relationships of sleep and liver function biomarkers with liver cancer incidence, and significant public health implications for the identification of susceptible populations and for the early prevention of liver cancer.

Accumulating evidence has demonstrated the adverse impact of unhealthy sleep on liver health [32,33,34,35]. Unhealthy sleep characteristics, including circadian rhythm abnormalities, sleep-disordered breathing, increased daytime somnolence, restless legs syndrome, nocturnal desaturations, and insomnia with nocturnal awakenings, could be frequently observed in chronic liver disease patients [32]. A crucial review summarized the epidemiology and pathophysiology of sleep–wake disturbance in liver disease, discussed the pathways involved, and indicated that altered melatonin metabolism, neuromuscular complications, and aberrant thermoregulation contributed to the development of liver disease driven by sleep–wake disorders [33]. However, evidence regarding the impact of sleep disturbance on liver cancer remains lacking. One of the few existing studies in this field was the Women’s Health Initiative Study conducted on 139,368 US postmenopausal women, and it found that sleep duration ≥ 9 h was associated with a moderately increased risk of liver cancer incidence in obese women [36]. In contrast, our study identified a significant association between unhealthy sleep, particularly unfavorable sleep duration, insomnia, and snoring, and increased risk of liver cancer incidence in a large prospective cohort with representative general population, systematic sleep evaluation, and relatively complete and precise diseases/death record. Notably, our study revealed a U-shaped relationship between sleep duration and liver cancer risk, indicating that both too short and too long sleep durations might be associated with increased risk of liver cancer incidence. At present, evidence on the impact of the sleep duration on the risk of cancer is still controversial. For instance, the U-shaped association between sleep duration and risk of colorectal or lung cancer was observed in large prospective cohort studies [8, 37]. On the other hand, there was no significant association of sleep duration with breast or prostate cancer risk according to published literature [38, 39]. The difference may be attributed to the different pathogeneses of these cancers, and disruption of the immune–inflammatory balance may be a reasonable biologic mechanism underlying the carcinogenic effect of short and long sleep durations [40, 41].

Moreover, our study revealed that ALT, AST, TBIL, GGT, ALP, and TP were positively associated with increased risk of liver cancer incidence while the association of ALB was inverse. Our findings were supported by most of the studies concerning the associations between liver function biomarkers and the risk of cancer or mortality [42,43,44]. According to published prospective cohort studies assessing the associations of these liver function biomarkers with all-cause mortality in the general populations, GGT and ALP were associated with increased all-cause mortality, while there were geographical variations in the association of ALT with all-cause mortality [45]. In addition, elevated GGT and AST/ALT were independent risk factors for predicting overall survival rate in primary hepatic carcinoma patients, and elevated levels of these biomarkers suggested poor prognosis [18]. Moreover, the inverse association of ALB with liver cancer incidence observed in our study was also generally supported by previous findings on the inverse associations of ALB with liver disease and liver cancer [46,47,48], as well as with other cancers [49,50,51]. As a cohort study of 82,061 Chinese participants found, ALB level was inversely associated with the incident risk of overall, lung, colorectal, and liver cancer in linear dose-dependent manners [46]. What's more, several studies indicated the therapeutic implications of human serum ALB due to its wide range of important physiologic functions, including oncotic effect, immunomodulation, antioxidant effect, endothelial stabilization, and binding to multiple drugs, toxins, and other molecules [47, 48]. Our findings of the significant relationships between these routine liver function biomarkers and risk of liver cancer incidence indicated the potential protective effects of controlling the levels of these liver function biomarkers, and it may be helpful in screening people at high liver cancer risk during routine liver function tests.

Furthermore, we conducted a novel investigation into the joint associations of sleep and liver function biomarkers with liver cancer incidence, as well as potential additive interactions. Our findings showed that individuals with unhealthy sleep and high levels of ALT, AST, TBIL, GGT, ALP, or TP or low level of ALB had a significantly increased risk of liver cancer incidence compared to those with healthy sleep and low levels of ALT, AST, TBIL, GGT, ALP, or TP or high level of ALB. Moreover, the joint effect of unhealthy sleep and high level of TP was greater than the sum of the two individual effects, and 38% of liver cancer risk could be attributed to the additive interaction. Our findings could aid in highlighting the joint associations of sleep and liver function biomarkers with liver cancer risk, and significant public health implications for the identification of susceptible populations and for the early prevention of liver cancer. Specifically, adhering to a healthy sleep and controlling routine liver function biomarkers levels will be beneficial in reducing liver cancer incidence risk.

Our study has several significant strengths, including the large nationwide general population sample, prospective study design, systematic assessment of sleep, uniform measurement of biomarkers, adequate adjustment for potential confounders, and relatively complete diseases/death records. In addition, we demonstrated the compelling associations of sleep and liver function biomarkers and their joint association with the risk of liver cancer incidence, providing potent evidence that adhering to healthy sleep and controlling liver function biomarkers levels may be a promising strategy for reducing liver cancer incidence risk. Moreover, we comprehensively investigated the association between sleep and liver cancer in terms of overall sleep score and independent sleep traits and found that unhealthy sleep, particularly unfavorable sleep duration, insomnia, and snoring, increased the risk of liver cancer incidence. However, our study also has some limitations. First, only the liver function biomarkers levels at baseline were used in the current study, which may be subject to random error and may lead to the misclassification of these biomarkers across the long follow-up period. Nevertheless, the reproductivities of these liver function biomarkers have been identified by previous studies to be fair to excellent so that the liver function biomarkers at baseline can also be representative and acceptable and capable of capturing the long-term effect on liver cancer [16]. Second, the incidence of liver cancer in this study is limited. Therefore, although the results of this study are robust, more studies conducted in populations with higher incidence of liver cancer are encouraged to validate our findings. Finally, as an observational study, we could not exclude the potential inverse association and residual confoundings, even though we scientifically adjusted for potential confounders as much as possible and conducted essential sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

Unhealthy sleep, as well as increased levels of ALT, AST, TBIL, GGT, ALP, and TP and decreased levels of ALB, were significantly associated with increased risk of liver cancer incidence. Participants with unhealthy sleep and jointly had lower levels of ALB or higher levels of ALT, AST, TBIL, GGT, ALP, or particularly TP were at higher risk of liver cancer incidence. Our findings suggest that adhering to healthy sleep and controlling liver function biomarker levels may be a promising strategy for reducing the risk of liver cancer incidence.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ALB:

Albumin

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

ALT:

Alanine transaminase

AP:

Attributable proportion due to the interaction

AST:

Aspartate transaminase

BMI:

Body mass index

CI:

Confidence interval

CRP:

C-reaction protein

GGT:

Gamma-glutamyl transferase

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HR:

Hazard ratio

ICD:

International classification of diseases

RERI:

Relative excess risk due to the interaction

SD:

Standard deviation

TBIL:

Total bilirubin

TP:

Total protein

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rumgay H, Arnold M, Ferlay J, Lesi O, Cabasag CJ, Vignat J, Laversanne M, McGlynn KA, Soerjomataram I. Global burden of primary liver cancer in 2020 and predictions to 2040. J Hepatol. 2022;77(6):1598–606.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Grewal P, Viswanathen VA. Liver cancer and alcohol. Clin Liver Dis. 2012;16(4):839–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang W-S, Zeng X-F, Liu Z-N, Zhao Q-H, Tan Y-T, Gao J, Li H-L, Xiang Y-B. Diet and liver cancer risk: a narrative review of epidemiological evidence. Br J Nutr. 2020;124(3):330–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marengo A, Rosso C, Bugianesi E. Liver cancer: connections with obesity, fatty liver, and cirrhosis. Annu Rev Med. 2016;67:103–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zelber-Sagi S, Noureddin M, Shibolet O. Lifestyle and hepatocellular carcinoma what is the evidence and prevention recommendations. Cancers (Basel). 2021;14(1):103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaput J-P, Gray CE, Poitras VJ, Carson V, Gruber R, Olds T, Weiss SK, Connor Gorber S, Kho ME, Sampson M, et al. Systematic review of the relationships between sleep duration and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(6 Suppl 3):S266-82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Xie J, Zhu M, Ji M, Fan J, Huang Y, Wei X, Jiang X, Xu J, Yin R, Wang Y, et al. Relationships between sleep traits and lung cancer risk: a prospective cohort study in UK Biobank. Sleep. 2021;44(9):zsab089.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang X, Giovannucci EL, Wu K, Gao X, Hu F, Ogino S, Schernhammer ES, Fuchs CS, Redline S, Willett WC, et al. Associations of self-reported sleep duration and snoring with colorectal cancer risk in men and women. Sleep. 2013;36(5):681–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Song C, Zhang R, Wang C, Fu R, Song W, Dou K, Wang S. Sleep quality and risk of cancer: findings from the English longitudinal study of aging. Sleep. 2021;44(3):zsaa192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shi T, Min M, Sun C, Zhang Y, Liang M, Sun Y. Does insomnia predict a high risk of cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Sleep Res. 2020;29(1):e12876.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mogavero MP, DelRosso LM, Fanfulla F, Bruni O, Ferri R. Sleep disorders and cancer: state of the art and future perspectives. Sleep Med Rev. 2021;56:101409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ning D, Fang Y, Zhang W. Association of habitual sleep duration and its trajectory with the risk of cancer according to sex and body mass index in a population-based cohort. Cancer. 2023;129(22):3582–94.

  14. Liu W, Cao S, Shi D, Yu L, Qiu W, Chen W, Wang B. Single-chemical and mixture effects of multiple volatile organic compounds exposure on liver injury and risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in a representative general adult population. Chemosphere. 2023;339:139753.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Newsome PN, Cramb R, Davison SM, Dillon JF, Foulerton M, Godfrey EM, Hall R, Harrower U, Hudson M, Langford A, et al. Guidelines on the management of abnormal liver blood tests. Gut. 2018;67(1):6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. He MM, Fang Z, Hang D, Wang F, Polychronidis G, Wang L, Lo CH, Wang K, Zhong R, Knudsen MD, et al. Circulating liver function markers and colorectal cancer risk: a prospective cohort study in the UK Biobank. Int J Cancer. 2021;148(8):1867–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li J, Tao H, Zhang E, Huang Z. Diagnostic value of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to alkaline phosphatase ratio combined with gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to aspartate aminotransferase ratio and alanine aminotransferase to aspartate aminotransferase ratio in alpha-fetoprotein-negative hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Med. 2021;10(14):4844–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang L-X, Lv Y, Xu AM, Wang H-Z. The prognostic significance of serum gamma-glutamyltransferase levels and AST/ALT in primary hepatic carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):841.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sudlow C, Gallacher J, Allen N, Beral V, Burton P, Danesh J, Downey P, Elliott P, Green J, Landray M, et al. UK Biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 2015;12(3):e1001779.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fan M, Sun D, Zhou T, Heianza Y, Lv J, Li L, Qi L. Sleep patterns, genetic susceptibility, and incident cardiovascular disease: a prospective study of 385 292 UK biobank participants. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(11):1182–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Li X, Xue QC, Wang MY, Zhou T, Ma H, Heianza Y, Qi L. Adherence to a healthy sleep pattern and incident heart failure a prospective study of 408 802 UK Biobank participants. Circulation. 2021;143(1):97–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang B-H, Duncan MJ, Cistulli PA, Nassar N, Hamer M, Stamatakis E. Sleep and physical activity in relation to all-cause, cardiovascular disease and cancer mortality risk. Br J Sports Med. 2022;56(13):718–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. UK Biobank Biomarker Project - Companion document to accompany serum biomarker data. Prepared for: UK Biobank Showcase. Version 1.0. 2019. https://biobank.ndph.ox.ac.uk/showcase/showcase/docs/serum_biochemistry.pdf.

  24. Ford JC, O’Rourke K, Veinot JP, Walley VM. Histologic estimation of coronary artery stenoses: reproducibility and the effect of training. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2000;9(5):251–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Du W, Guan H, Wan X, Zhu Z, Yu H, Luo P, Chen L, Su J, Lu Y, Hang D, et al. Circulating liver function markers and the risk of COPD in the UK Biobank. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1121900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen J, Dan L, Tu X, Sun Y, Deng M, Chen X, Hesketh T, Li R, Wang X, Li X. Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and liver function markers are associated with Crohn’s disease but not Ulcerative Colitis: a prospective cohort study. Hepatol Int. 2023;17(1):202–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Murphy N, Carreras-Torres R, Song MY, Chan AT, Martin RM, Papadimitriou N, Dimou N, Tsilidis KK, Banbury B, Bradbury KE, et al. Circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 associate with risk of colorectal cancer based on serologic and mendelian randomization analyses. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(5):1300–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Greenland S. Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. Am J Public Health. 1989;79(3):340–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Said MA, Verweij N, van der Harst P. Associations of combined genetic and lifestyle risks with incident cardiovascular disease and diabetes in the UK Biobank Study. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3(8):693–702.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Guidelines for data processing and analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) – short and long forms. 2005. https://biobank.ndph.ox.ac.uk/showcase/ukb/docs/ipaq_analysis.pdf.

  31. Assmann SF, Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Mundt KA. Confidence intervals for measures of interaction. Epidemiology. 1996;7(3):286–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. De Cruz S, Espiritu JRD, Zeidler M, Wang TS. Sleep disorders in chronic liver disease. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;33(1):26–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Marjot T, Ray DW, Williams FR, Tomlinson JW, Armstrong MJ. Sleep and liver disease: a bidirectional relationship. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6(10):850–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Plotogea O-M, Ilie M, Bungau S, Chiotoroiu AL, Stanescu AMA, Diaconu CC. Comprehensive overview of sleep disorders in patients with chronic liver disease. Brain Sci. 2021;11(2):142.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Shen N, Wang P, Yan W. Sleep duration and the risk of fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31956.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Royse KE, El-Serag HB, Chen L, White DL, Hale L, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Jiao L. Sleep duration and risk of liver cancer in postmenopausal women: the women’s health initiative study. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017;26(12):1270–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jiao L, Duan Z, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Hale L, White DL, El-Serag HB. Sleep duration and incidence of colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women. Br J Cancer. 2013;108(1):213–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Markt SC, Flynn-Evans EE, Valdimarsdottir UA, Sigurdardottir LG, Tamimi RM, Batista JL, Haneuse S, Lockley SW, Stampfer M, Wilson KM, et al. Sleep duration and disruption and prostate cancer risk: a 23-year prospective study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25(2):302–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Qin Y, Zhou Y, Zhang X, Wei X, He J. Sleep duration and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Cancer. 2014;134(5):1166–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Irwin MR, Olmstead R, Carroll JE. Sleep disturbance, sleep duration, and inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies and experimental sleep deprivation. Biol Psychiatry. 2016;80(1):40–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bollinger T, Bollinger A, Oster H, Solbach W. Sleep, immunity, and circadian clocks: a mechanistic model. Gerontology. 2010;56(6):574–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Koehler EM, Sanna D, Hansen BE, van Rooij FJ, Heeringa J, Hofman A, Tiemeier H, Stricker BH, Schouten JNL, Janssen HLA. Serum liver enzymes are associated with all-cause mortality in an elderly population. Liver Int. 2014;34(2):296–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Strasak AM, Rapp K, Brant LJ, Hilbe W, Gregory M, Oberaigner W, Ruttmann E, Concin H, Diem G, Pfeiffer KP, et al. Association of gamma-glutamyltransferase and risk of cancer incidence in men: a prospective study. Cancer Res. 2008;68(10):3970–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Katzke V, Johnson T, Sookthai D, Hüsing A, Kühn T, Kaaks R. Circulating liver enzymes and risks of chronic diseases and mortality in the prospective EPIC-Heidelberg case-cohort study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(3):e033532.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kunutsor SK, Apekey TA, Seddoh D, Walley J. Liver enzymes and risk of all-cause mortality in general populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(1):187–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang Z, Zheng Y, Wu Z, Wen Y, Wang G, Chen S, Tan F, Li J, Wu S, Dai M, et al. Association between pre-diagnostic serum albumin and cancer risk: results from a prospective population-based study. Cancer Med. 2021;10(12):4054–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Spinella R, Sawhney R, Jalan R. Albumin in chronic liver disease: structure, functions and therapeutic implications. Hepatol Int. 2016;10(1):124–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Jagdish RK, Maras JS, Sarin SK. Albumin in advanced liver diseases: the good and bad of a drug! Hepatology. 2021;74(5):2848–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Stevens RG, Jones DY, Micozzi MS, Taylor PR. Body iron stores and the risk of cancer. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(16):1047–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kühn T, Sookthai D, Graf ME, Schübel R, Freisling H, Johnson T, Katzke V, Kaaks R. Albumin, bilirubin, uric acid and cancer risk: results from a prospective population-based study. Br J Cancer. 2017;117(10):1572–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Ko WF, Helzlsouer KJ, Comstock GW. Serum albumin, bilirubin, and uric acid and the anatomic site-specific incidence of colon cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86(24):1874–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted using the UK Biobank Resource (application number: 88159). The authors thank the investigators and participants involved in the UK Biobank for their contributions to this study.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant Number 82203996] and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [Grant Numbers 2022T150230; 2021M691131].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China

    Jiahao Song, Lieyang Fan, Xuefeng Lai, Wei Liu, Linling Yu, Ruyi Liang, Yongfang Zhang, Shuhui Wan, Yueru Yang & Bin Wang

  2. Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education & Ministry of Environmental Protection, and State Key Laboratory of Environmental Health (Incubating), School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China

    Jiahao Song, Lieyang Fan, Xuefeng Lai, Wei Liu, Linling Yu, Ruyi Liang, Yongfang Zhang, Shuhui Wan, Yueru Yang & Bin Wang

  3. Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2P5, AB, Canada

    Da Shi

  4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China

    Hao Wang

Authors
  1. Jiahao Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lieyang Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Da Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xuefeng Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Linling Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ruyi Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yongfang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Shuhui Wan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yueru Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Bin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.S.: conceptualization, methodology, data analysis, manuscript draft. L.F., D.S., X.L., H.W., W.L, L.Y., R.L., Y.Z., S.W., and Y.Y.: methodology, writing—review and editing. B.W.: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, funding acquisition, manuscript revision and review. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

UK Biobank has ethical approval from the North West Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee (reference 16/NW/0274).

Consent for publication

All participants consented to the use of their de-identified data and access to their national health-related hospital and death records.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

12916_2024_3440_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Additional file 1: Table S1. Definition of the sleep traits and healthy sleep scoring system in the UK Biobank. Table S2. Association of sleep score with the risk of incident liver cancer (N = 356,850). Table S3. Stratified analyses of the associations between liver function biomarkers and the risk of incident liver cancer (N = 356,894). Table S4. Association of sleep with the risk of incident liver cancer after excluding incident liver cancer in the first 2 years of follow-up (N = 356,850). Table S5. Associations of liver function biomarkers with the risk of incident liver cancer after excluding incident liver cancer in the first 2 years of follow-up (N = 356,850). Table S6. Association of sleep with the risk of incident liver cancer after excluding individuals with liver disease at baseline (N = 356,858). Table S7. Associations of liver function biomarkers with the risk for incident liver cancer after excluding individuals with liver disease at baseline (N = 356,858). Table S8. Association of sleep with the risk of incident liver cancer after further adjustment (N = 356,894). Table S9. Associations of liver function biomarkers with the risk for incident liver cancer after further adjustment (N = 356,894). Table S10. Association of sleep with the risk of incident liver cancer by inverse probability weighting analysis (N = 356,894). Table S11. Associations of liver function biomarkers with the risk for incident liver cancer by inverse probability weighting analysis (N = 356,894). Table S12. Association of sleep with the risk of incident liver cancer in mortality competing risk model (N = 356,894). Table S13. Associations of liver function biomarkers with the risk for incident liver cancer in mortality competing risk model (N = 356,894). Fig. S1. Kaplan–Meier curves of sleep and independent sleep traits with incident liver cancer. Fig. S2. Association of sleep duration with the risk of incident liver cancer across different hours (N = 356,894). Fig. S3. Associations between liver function biomarkers and the risk of incident liver cancer by restricted cubic spline regression (N = 356,894)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, J., Fan, L., Shi, D. et al. Sleep and liver function biomarkers in relation to risk of incident liver cancer: a nationwide prospective cohort study. BMC Med 22, 261 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03440-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03440-w

Keywords

BMC Medicine

ISSN: 1741-7015

Contact us