Skip to main content
Download PDF

New insights into the health effects of dietary saturated and omega-6 and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids

BMC Medicine volume 10, Article number: 50 (2012) Cite this article

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases and cancers are leading causes of morbidity and mortality. Reducing dietary saturated fat and replacing it with polyunsaturated fat is still the main dietary strategy to prevent cardiovascular diseases, although major flaws have been reported in the analyses supporting this approach. Recent studies introducing the concept of myocardial preconditioning have opened new avenues to understand the complex interplay between the various lipids and the risk of cardiovascular diseases. The optimal dietary fat profile includes a low intake of both saturated and omega-6 fatty acids and a moderate intake of omega-3 fatty acids. This profile is quite similar to the Mediterranean diet. On the other hand, recent studies have found a positive association between omega-6 and breast cancer risk. In contrast, omega-3 fatty acids do have anticancer properties. It has been shown that certain (Mediterranean) polyphenols significantly increase the endogenous synthesis of omega-3 whereas high intake of omega-6 decreases it. Finally, epidemiological studies suggest that a high omega-3 to omega-6 ratio may be the optimal strategy to decrease breast cancer risk. Thus, the present high intake of omega-6 in many countries is definitely not the optimal strategy to prevent cardiovascular disease and cancers. A moderate intake of plant and marine omega-3 in the context of the traditional Mediterranean diet (low in saturated and omega-6 fatty acids but high in plant monounsaturated fat) appears to be the best approach to reduce the risk of both cardiovascular diseases and cancers, in particular breast cancer.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death in most countries. Reducing saturated fatty acid (SFA) intakes is still at the heart of dietary recommendations to reduce CVD, mainly because of its effect on blood cholesterol [1]. This view has recently been challenged. First, a review of epidemiological studies failed to conclude that SFAs are associated with an increased risk of CVD [2]. Second, the validity of meta-analyses of clinical trials showing that CVD can be prevented by replacing SFAs with polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) has been questioned [3, 4] because they omitted relevant trials with unfavorable outcomes (selection bias) and included others that were poorly designed (no randomization) [5, 6]. Third, it has been claimed that the effect of diet on a single biomarker (such as plasma cholesterol) is insufficient evidence to assess CVD risk [7]. Fourth, the hypothetical protective effect of omega-6 PUFAs has been said to be considerably exaggerated [8, 9], because of the failure to draw a line between the trials that selectively increased omega-6 PUFAs and those that substantially increased omega-3 PUFAs - known to reduce CVD risk [10, 11] - together with omega-6 PUFAs to replace SFAs [3, 4]. Finally, clinical and epidemiological studies exploring the dietary fat issue failed to provide a clear biological understanding of the effect of the various dietary fats on the risk of CVD.

There is one exception: the Mediterranean diet [12], which is a complex interplay between the different series of dietary lipids, including conjugated or non-conjugated (animal or industrial) trans fatty acids, short-, medium- and long-chain SFAs, various series - at least the omega-7 and omega-9 - of monounsaturated fatty acids, and the various series of PUFAs, including omega-3 and omega-6 [12, 13]. All these lipids and their interactions should be taken into account when analyzing the effect of dietary fat on CVD complications and mortality. Besides the Mediterranean diet, this complexity makes the interpretation of epidemiological data very difficult and explains the ceaseless controversy about dietary fats and the risk of CVD. However, recent studies in experimental nutrition using the concept of myocardial preconditioning [14] have provided new and critical insights into the biological effects of dietary fat on CVD complications and mortality.

Dietary fat, myocardial preconditioning and cardiovascular disease

Preconditioning - that is, the ability of the myocardium to withstand an ischemia-reperfusion injury - is a major concept in cardiology [14]. The extent of cell death during and after myocardial ischemia is actually the primary determinant of the outcome of a heart attack. Ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac pump failure are among the main clinical complications that are prevented by the initiation of myocardial preconditioning. Drug makers have failed to identify pharmacological methods able to induce chronic preconditioning [15]. In contrast, there are strong clinical and experimental data suggesting that lifestyle - including moderate alcohol drinking and physical exercise - is a potent preconditioner [16, 17]. Also, polyphenols present in certain plants - and abundant in red wine - induce preconditioning [18]. Although obtained in experimental conditions, data regarding chronic myocardial preconditioning as induced by lifestyle and nutrition are highly consistent with our general clinical knowledge regarding the effects of lifestyle and nutrition on CVD complications and mortality. The next question is whether myocardial preconditioning could shed light on the role of dietary fat in CVD.

In fact, two recent studies on rat models have provided major findings by comparing the effects of different dietary fat profiles on the induction of myocardial preconditioning [19, 20]. In both studies, the investigators compared the effects of diets that were high in SFAs or omega-6 but poor in omega-3 with diets that were poor in SFAs and omega-6 but rich in omega-3. In both studies, the best protection was obtained in the groups of rats receiving the diet high in omega-3 PUFAs but relatively poor in SFAs and omega-6 PUFAs, while the diet rich in omega-6 but relatively poor in SFAs and omega-3 PUFAs provided no protection [19] or a protection halfway between the diets rich in SFAs, on one hand, and in omega-3, on the other hand [20]. Thus, as compared with the common Western diet - rich in either SFAs or omega-6 PUFAs but poor in omega-3 PUFAs - an optimal dietary pattern aimed at reducing CVD complications and mortality should include a reduced intake of both SFAs and omega-6, in addition to increased plant and marine omega-3 PUFAs. Not surprisingly, this dietary fatty acid profile is similar - but not identical - to that of the Mediterranean diet, which also is rich in plant monounsaturated fat and poor in industrial trans fatty acids [12, 13].

These data should help identify the optimal dietary fatty acid profile to reduce the risk and the complications of CVD. Thus, maintaining high [8] or increasing - as proposed by certain experts [6, 9] - the intake of omega-6 in lieu of SFAs is definitely not the optimal strategy to prevent CVD complications.

Dietary fat and cancer

In animal studies, omega-6 PUFAs have a strong mammary tumor-enhancing effect [21, 22]. In order to exert their carcinogenic effects, they must first undergo an oxidative metabolization, mainly through the lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase pathways [23, 24]. The main substrate of these oxidative pathways is arachidonic acid, which is mainly produced from dietary linoleic acid, the most common omega-6 PUFAs in Western foods and cooking fats. Several recent epidemiologic studies have found a positive association between dietary omega-6 PUFAs and breast cancer risk [25–30]. Certain analyses took into account a genetic predisposition related to omega-6 metabolism. To determine whether 5-lipoxygenase (LOX)-mediated dietary omega-6 metabolism might influence breast cancer risk, investigators examined genetic variants of the LOX enzyme in combination with linoleic acid intakes [25]. They found that women with a genetic aberration affecting the LOX enzyme whose diet provided a high level of omega-6 (linoleic acid) had a significantly increased breast cancer risk [25]. However, when women with the same high-risk genetic profile had a diet lower in linoleic acid, their genotype had no significant effect on their breast cancer risk. This demonstration that a diet-gene interaction increases the risk of cancer may explain why some previous studies were inconsistent or conflicting. Other recent studies have shown interactions between heterocyclic amines and omega-6 PUFAs on the one hand [26], and between omega-3 and omega-6 on the other hand [27], in determining the risk of invasive breast cancer. Other factors, such as the obesity status [28], were shown to affect the association between dietary PUFAs and breast cancer risk. Finally, the food sources of omega-3 and omega-6 PUFAs, as well as their relative amounts in the diet of individuals, appear to be very important for breast cancer risk [29, 30].

Thus, there are several recent and concordant studies that strongly suggest that dietary omega-6 PUFAs - the consumption of which is encouraged worldwide to decrease blood cholesterol - increase the risk of breast cancers. In the same line of reasoning, it is important to recall that the most frequently prescribed cholesterol-lowering drugs (including statins) increase the blood concentration of arachidonic acid, the main omega-6 PUFA in cell membranes [31]. Also, studies have suggested that low cholesterol and/or cholesterol-lowering are associated with an increased risk of cancers [32]. Thus, despite the fact that many confounders tend to obscure the effects of cholesterol-lowering drugs on the clinical occurrence of cancers, the association of high intake of omega-6 and statins - both aimed at reducing blood cholesterol to prevent CVD - may add up to increase cancer risk, in particular breast cancer risk. Further studies are urgently needed to explore the issue.

It could be said that most data regarding the effects of dietary omega-6 PUFAs on cancers are observational [25–30] and do not demonstrate cause-effect relationship. Only randomized trials can demonstrate causality. In fact, two dietary trials not initially designed to test a diet-cancer hypothesis, the Veterans Los Angeles trial [33] and the Lyon Diet Heart Study [34], provided some information about dietary omega-6 and cancers. In the Los Angeles trial, there was a huge increase in dietary omega-6 in the experimental group compared with the control group (15% total energy versus 5%) and there was a significant increase in the incidence of new cancers and in cancer mortality in the high omega-6 group [33]. By contrast, in the Lyon trial, the intake of omega-6 was slightly but significantly reduced in the experimental group (3.6% total energy versus 5.3%) and there was a significant decrease in cancer incidence in the low omega-6 group [34]. These two trials with very different amounts of omega-6 in the experimental groups do not definitely demonstrate that omega-6 fatty acids per se increase the risk of cancer - other dietary factors and various interactions (including drug treatment as mentioned above) likely played a role in the clinical surfacing of new cancers and their severity - but they clearly signal that lipid profiles with high or relatively high (> 5% energy) omega-6 tend to increase the risk of cancers, which is in line with the observational studies discussed above.

At the same time, omega-3 PUFAs were shown to have chemopreventive properties against various cancers and their complications, including colon and breast cancer [35, 36]. It is therefore important to design dietary strategies that will result in increased omega-3 in diet, blood and tissues, associated with decreased omega-6. In addition to increasing the dietary intake of omega-3, it is possible to stimulate the endogenous synthesis of very long-chain omega-3 PUFAS - often called 'marine' omega-3 - out of their plant substrate alpha-linolenic acid, through the consumption of plant pigments such as the polyphenols found, for instance, in grapes and red wine [37–39]. Both alpha-linolenic acid and the polyphenol anthocyanins are present in quite large amounts in the traditional Mediterranean diet, also poor in omega-6, which may at least partly explain the remarkable protection this diet provides against cancers [40, 41]. In contrast, the main dietary omega-6 linoleic acid inhibits synthesis and cell incorporation of long-chain omega-3 PUFAs [42, 43] which is in line with the effects of omega-6 on cancer risk as discussed above.

The association of oleic acid - the main fatty acid of olive oil, a major component of the Mediterranean diet - with breast cancer risk has been analyzed in several studies [44–46] and provided conflicting data. In fact, it is only when the level of oleic acid in blood or cells was used in the analyses (and not as a nutrient through a frequency questionnaire) that it was positively associated with cancer risk [46]. The level of oleic acid in blood and tissue is more dependent on endogenous metabolism than on dietary intake. The main enzymatic system regulating oleic acid level is the delta-9 desaturase - also called stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase - and its activity depends on dietary (carbohydrate intake), hormonal (insulin) and lifestyle (physical exercise) factors [47]. Thus, blood concentration of oleic acid is not a surrogate of the consumption of oleic acid but rather a biomarker of lifestyle associated with insulin resistance, which is by itself positively associated with the risk of breast cancer [48]. Finally, dietary oleic acid is not necessarily a marker of olive oil consumption as it is also one of the main fatty acids of meat. It is critical in epidemiologic studies analyzing the relationships between oleic acid intake and any clinical outcome to include the geographic area of the studied population: in the Mediterranean area, the dietary source of oleic acid is mainly olive oil (a plant food) whereas in most Western countries, animal foods are the main sources of oleic acid. Importantly, olive oils contain more than the sole lipids; certain phytonutrients such as polyphenols may also interfere with the risk of cancers [49]. Thus, when analyzing the relationships between breast cancer and dietary habits, the type of fatty foods - plant versus animal - is as important as the type of fatty acids.

Summary and prospects

From the most recent experimental and epidemiological studies, we conclude that the optimal dietary fat pattern to reduce the risk of both CVD and most cancers should include a low intake of SFAs and omega-6 PUFAs. Small amounts (1% to 2% of energy intake) of the essential linoleic acid - easy to find in most Western foods - are sufficient to prevent omega-6 deficiency [50, 51]. The amounts of omega-6 in most Western foods are so high that it could be difficult to obtain an intake of omega-6 lower than 4% of energy [52], which would probably be the optimal level. The high average intake of omega-6 PUFAs in Western countries [53, 54] may explain the persistently high rate of CVD complications and the increased incidence of certain cancers, including breast cancer. The intake of omega-3 PUFAs, from plant and marine sources, should be moderate (a minimum of 3 g/day in average for an adult with at least 2 g/day of the essential alpha-linolenic acid), which is far from the case at present in many populations [53, 54].

Finally, regarding the intake of oleic acid, it is critical to differentiate the food sources, since the health effects of oleic acid obtained from meat or from olive oil are different. To simplify the dietary advice aimed at protecting health - and help consumers to understand it - the best approach is probably the traditional Mediterranean diet model. No dietary pattern has been so extensively studied, and no other has been shown to provide so many benefits without any adverse effects.

Abbreviations

CVD:

cardiovascular disease

LOX:

5-lipoxygenase

PUFA:

polyunsaturated fatty acid

SFA:

saturated fatty acid.

References

  1. 1.

    Smith SC, Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, Braun LT, Creager MA, Franklin BA, Gibbons RJ, Grundy SM, Hiratzka LF, Jones DW, Lloyd-Jones DM, Minissian M, Mosca L, Peterson ED, Sacco RL, Spertus J, Stein JH, Taubert KA: AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011, 58: 2432-2446. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.824.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Siri-Tarino PW, Sun Q, Hu FB, Krauss RM: Meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies evaluating the association of saturated fat with cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010, 91: 535-546. 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27725.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ramsden CE, Hibbeln JR, Majchrzak SF, Davis JM: N-6 fatty acid-specific and mixed polyunsaturated dietary interventions have different effects on CHD risk: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Nutr. 2010, 104: 1586-1600. 10.1017/S0007114510004010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ramsden CE, Hibbeln JR, Majchrzak SF: All PUFAs are not created equal: absence of CHD benefit specific to linoleic acid in randomized controlled trials and prospective observational cohorts. World Rev Nutr Diet. 2011, 102: 30-43.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jakobsen MU, O'Reilly EJ, Heitmann BL, Pereira MA, Bälter K, Fraser GE, Goldbourt U, Hallmans G, Knekt P, Liu S, Pietinen P, Spiegelman D, Stevens J, Virtamo J, Willett WC, Ascherio A: Major types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a pooled analysis of 11 cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009, 89: 1425-1432. 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27124.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mozaffarian D, Micha R, Wallace S: Effects on coronary heart disease of increasing polyunsaturated fat in place of saturated fat: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS Med. 2010, 7: e1000252-10.1371/journal.pmed.1000252.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Astrup A, Dyerberg J, Elwood P, Hermansen K, Hu FB, Jakobsen MU, Kok FJ, Krauss RM, Lecerf JM, LeGrand P, Nestel P, Risérus U, Sanders T, Sinclair A, Stender S, Tholstrup T, Willett WC: The role of reducing intakes of saturated fat in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: where does the evidence stand in 2010?. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011, 93: 684-688. 10.3945/ajcn.110.004622.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Harris WS, Mozaffarian D, Rimm E, Kris-Etherton P, Rudel LL, Appel LJ, Engler MM, Engler MB, Sacks F: Omega-6 fatty acids and risk for cardiovascular disease: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Nutrition Subcommittee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation. 2009, 119: 902-907. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191627.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Katan MB: Omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids and coronary heart disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009, 89: 1283-1284. 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27744.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    De Caterina R: n-3 fatty acids in cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2011, 364: 2439-2450. 10.1056/NEJMra1008153.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Deckelbaum RJ, Leaf A, Mozaffarian D, Jacobson TA, Harris WS, Akabas SR: Conclusions and recommendations from the symposium, Beyond Cholesterol: Prevention and Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease with n-3 Fatty Acids. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008, 87: 2010S-2012S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    de Lorgeril M, Salen P: The Mediterranean diet: rationale and evidence for its benefit. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2008, 10: 518-522. 10.1007/s11883-008-0080-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    de Lorgeril M, Salen P: Mediterranean diet in secondary prevention of CHD. Public Health Nutr. 2011, 14: 2333-2337. 10.1017/S136898001100259X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA: New insights into potential mechanisms of ischemic preconditioning. Circulation. 1991, 84: 442-445.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Luca MC, Liuni A, Muxel S, Münzel T, Forconi S, Gori T, Parker JD: Chronic pharmacological preconditioning against ischemia. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2011, 49: 287-293.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Guiraud A, de Lorgeril M, Boucher F, Berthonneche C, Rakotovao A, de Leiris J: Cardioprotective effect of chronic low dose ethanol drinking: insights into the concept of ethanol preconditioning. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2004, 36: 561-566. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2004.02.003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Starnes JW, Taylor RP: Exercise-induced cardioprotection: endogenous mechanisms. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007, 39: 1537-1543. 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180d099d4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Toufektsian MC, de Lorgeril M, Nagy N, Salen P, Donati MB, Giordano L, Mock HP, Peterek S, Matros A, Petroni K, Pilu R, Rotilio D, Tonelli C, de Leiris J, Boucher F, Martin C: Chronic dietary intake of plant-derived anthocyanins protects the rat heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Nutr. 2008, 138: 747-752.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Abdukeyum GG, Owen AJ, McLennan PL: Dietary (n-3) long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids inhibit ischemia and reperfusion arrhythmia and infarction in rat heart not enhanced by ischemic preconditioning. J Nutr. 2008, 138: 1902-1909.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Zeghichi-Hamri S, de Lorgeril M, Salen P, Chibane M, de Leiris J, Boucher F, Laporte F: Protective effect of dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on myocardial resistance to ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. Nutr Res. 2010, 30: 849-857. 10.1016/j.nutres.2010.10.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Braden LM, Carroll KK: Dietary polyunsaturated fat in relation to mammary carcinogenesis in rats. Lipids. 1986, 21: 285-288. 10.1007/BF02536414.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hubbard NE, Erickson KL: Enhancement of metastasis from a transplantable mouse mammary tumor by dietary linoleic acid. Cancer Res. 1987, 47: 6171-6175.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Fürstenberger G, Krieg P, Müller-Decker K, Habenicht AJ: What are cyclooxygenases and lipoxygenases doing in the driver's seat of carcinogenesis?. Int J Cancer. 2006, 119: 2247-2254. 10.1002/ijc.22153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zha S, Yegnasubramanian V, Nelson WG, Isaacs WB, De Marzo AM: Cyclooxygenases in cancer: progress and perspective. Cancer Lett. 2004, 215: 1-20. 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.06.014.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wang J, John EM, Ingles SA: 5-lipoxygenase and 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein gene polymorphisms, dietary linoleic acid, and risk for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008, 17: 2748-2754. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0439.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sonestedt E, Ericson U, Gullberg B, Skog K, Olsson H, Wirfält E: Do both heterocyclic amines and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids contribute to the incidence of breast cancer in postmenopausal women of the Malmö diet and cancer cohort?. Int J Cancer. 2008, 123: 1637-1643. 10.1002/ijc.23394.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gago-Dominguez M, Yuan JM, Sun CL, Lee HP, Yu MC: Opposing effects of dietary n-3 and n-6 fatty acids on mammary carcinogenesis: The Singapore Chinese Health Study. Br J Cancer. 2003, 89: 1686-1692. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601340.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chajès V, Torres-Mejia G, Biessy C, Ortega-Olvera C, Angeles-Llerenas A, Ferrari P, Lazcano-Ponce E, Romieu I: ω-3 and ω-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid intakes and the risk of breast cancer in Mexican women: impact of obesity status. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012, 21: 319-326. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0896.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Murff HJ, Shu XO, Li H, Yang G, Wu X, Cai H, Wen W, Gao YT, Zheng W: Dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids and breast cancer risk in Chinese women: a prospective cohort study. Int J Cancer. 2011, 128: 1434-1441. 10.1002/ijc.25703.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Thiébaut AC, Chajès V, Gerber M, Boutron-Ruault MC, Joulin V, Lenoir G, Berrino F, Riboli E, Bénichou J, Clavel-Chapelon F: Dietary intakes of omega-6 and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and the risk of breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2009, 124: 924-931. 10.1002/ijc.23980.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    de Lorgeril M, Salen P, Guiraud A, Zeghichi S, Boucher F, de Leiris J: Lipid-lowering drugs and essential omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids in patients with coronary heart disease. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2005, 15: 36-41. 10.1016/j.numecd.2004.09.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ravnskov U, McCully KS, Rosch PJ: The statin-low cholesterol-cancer conundrum. QJM. 2012, 105 (4): 383-388. 10.1093/qjmed/hcr243.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Pearce ML, Dayton S: Incidence of cancer in men on a diet high in polyunsaturated fat. Lancet. 1971, 1: 464-467.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    de Lorgeril M, Salen P, Martin JL, Monjaud I, Boucher P, Mamelle N: Mediterranean dietary pattern in a randomized trial: prolonged survival and possible reduced cancer rate. Arch Intern Med. 1998, 158: 1181-1187. 10.1001/archinte.158.11.1181.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cockbain AJ, Toogood GJ, Hull MA: Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids for the treatment and prevention of colorectal cancer. Gut. 2012, 61: 135-149. 10.1136/gut.2010.233718.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Patterson RE, Flatt SW, Newman VA, Natarajan L, Rock CL, Thomson CA, Caan BJ, Parker BA, Pierce JP: Marine fatty acid intake is associated with breast cancer prognosis. J Nutr. 2011, 141: 201-206. 10.3945/jn.110.128777.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Toufektsian MC, Salen P, Laporte F, Tonelli C, de Lorgeril M: Dietary flavonoids increase plasma very long-chain (n-3) fatty acids in rats. J Nutr. 2011, 141: 37-41. 10.3945/jn.110.127225.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    di Giuseppe R, de Lorgeril M, Salen P, Laporte F, Di Castelnuovo A, Krogh V, Siani A, Arnout J, Cappuccio FP, van Dongen M, Donati MB, de Gaetano G, Iacoviello L, European Collaborative Group of the IMMIDIET Project: Alcohol consumption and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in healthy men and women from 3 European populations. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009, 89: 354-362.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    de Lorgeril M, Salen P, Martin JL, Boucher F, de Leiris J: Interactions of wine drinking with omega-3 fatty acids in patients with coronary heart disease: a fish-like effect of moderate wine drinking. Am Heart J. 2008, 155: 175-181. 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.08.009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Trichopoulou A, Bamia C, Lagiou P, Trichopoulos D: Conformity to traditional Mediterranean diet and breast cancer risk in the Greek EPIC (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition) cohort. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010, 92: 620-625. 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29619.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Buckland G, Agudo A, Luján L, Jakszyn P, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Palli D, Boeing H, Carneiro F, Krogh V, Sacerdote C, Tumino R, Panico S, Nesi G, Manjer J, Regnér S, Johansson I, Stenling R, Sanchez MJ, Dorronsoro M, Barricarte A, Navarro C, Quirós JR, Allen NE, Key TJ, Bingham S, Kaaks R, Overvad K, Jensen M, Olsen A, Tjønneland , et al: Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and risk of gastric adenocarcinoma within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010, 91: 381-390. 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28209.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Cleland LG, James MJ, Neumann MA, D'Angelo M, Gibson RA: Linoleate inhibits EPA incorporation from dietary fish-oil supplements in human subjects. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992, 55: 395-399.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Tu WC, Cook-Johnson RJ, James MJ, Mühlhäusler BS, Gibson RA: Omega-3 long chain fatty acid synthesis is regulated more by substrate levels than gene expression. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2010, 83: 61-68. 10.1016/j.plefa.2010.04.001.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Voorrips LE, Brants HA, Kardinaal AF, Hiddink GJ, van den Brandt PA, Goldbohm RA: Intake of conjugated linoleic acid, fat, and other fatty acids in relation to postmenopausal breast cancer: the Netherlands Cohort Study on Diet and Cancer. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002, 76: 873-882.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Wolk A, Bergström R, Hunter D, Willett W, Ljung H, Holmberg L, Bergkvist L, Bruce A, Adami HO: A prospective study of association of monounsaturated fat and other types of fat with risk of breast cancer. Arch Intern Med. 1998, 158: 41-45. 10.1001/archinte.158.1.41.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Pala V, Krogh V, Muti P, Chajès V, Riboli E, Micheli A, Saadatian M, Sieri S, Berrino F: Erythrocyte membrane fatty acids and subsequent breast cancer: a prospective Italian study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001, 93: 1088-1095. 10.1093/jnci/93.14.1088.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Chajès V, Joulin V, Clavel-Chapelon F: The fatty acid desaturation index of blood lipids, as a biomarker of hepatic stearoyl-CoA desaturase expression, is a predictive factor of breast cancer risk. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2011, 22: 6-10. 10.1097/MOL.0b013e3283404552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Sieri S, Muti P, Claudia A, Berrino F, Pala V, Grioni S, Abagnato CA, Blandino G, Contiero P, Schunemann HJ, Krogh V: Prospective study on the role of glucose metabolism in breast cancer occurrence. Int J Cancer. 2012, 130: 921-929. 10.1002/ijc.26071.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Escrich E, Moral R, Solanas M: Olive oil, an essential component of the Mediterranean diet, and breast cancer. Public Health Nutr. 2011, 14: 2323-2332. 10.1017/S1368980011002588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hansen AE, Haggard ME, Boelsche AN, Adam DJ, Wiese HF: Essential fatty acids in infant nutrition. III. Clinical manifestations of linoleic acid deficiency. J Nutr. 1958, 66: 565-576.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Gibson R, Makrides M: Letter to the Editor. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2011, 85: 403-404. 10.1016/j.plefa.2011.09.002.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    de Lorgeril M, Renaud S, Mamelle N, Salen P, Martin JL, Monjaud I, Guidollet J, Touboul P, Delaye J: Mediterranean alpha-linolenic acid-rich diet in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Lancet. 1994, 343: 1454-1459. 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92580-1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Blasbalg TL, Hibbeln JR, Ramsden CE, Majchrzak SF, Rawlings RR: Changes in consumption of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids in the United States during the 20th century. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011, 93: 950-962. 10.3945/ajcn.110.006643.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Meyer BJ, Mann NJ, Lewis JL, Milligan GC, Sinclair AJ, Howe PR: Dietary intakes and food sources of omega-6 and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Lipids. 2003, 391-398. 38

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/10/50/prepub

Download references

Acknowledgements

MdeL and PS received grants from the European Community.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire Cœur & Nutrition, TIMC-IMAG, Université Joseph Fourier-CNRS, Faculté de Médecine, Grenoble, France

    Michel de Lorgeril & Patricia Salen

Authors
  1. Michel de Lorgeril
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patricia Salen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel de Lorgeril.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

MdeL drafted the manuscript. PS critically revised the manuscript and gave final approval for publication.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Lorgeril, M., Salen, P. New insights into the health effects of dietary saturated and omega-6 and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. BMC Med 10, 50 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-50

Download citation

Keywords

  • Oleic Acid
  • Breast Cancer Risk
  • Trans Fatty Acid
  • Mediterranean Diet
  • Traditional Mediterranean Diet

BMC Medicine

ISSN: 1741-7015

Contact us