Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Antibiotic use during pregnancy: how bad is it?

BMC Medicine201614:91

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0636-0

Received: 5 February 2016

Accepted: 3 June 2016

Published: 17 June 2016

Abstract

Background

Our microbial companions (the “microbiota”) are extremely important for the preservation of human health. Although changes in bacterial communities (dysbiosis) are commonly associated with disease, such changes have also been described in healthy pregnancies, where the microbiome plays an essential role in maternal and child health outcomes, including normal immune and metabolic function in later life. Nevertheless, this new understanding of the importance of the microbiome has not yet influenced contemporary clinical practice regarding antibiotic use during pregnancy.

Discussion

Antibiotic treatment during pregnancy is widespread in Western countries, and accounts for 80 % of prescribed medications in pregnancy. However, antibiotic treatment, while at times lifesaving, can also have detrimental consequences. A single course of antibiotics perturbs bacterial communities, with evidence that the microbial ecosystem does not return completely to baseline following treatment. Antibiotics in pregnancy should be used only when indicated, choosing those with the narrowest range possible.

Summary

Bacteria are essential for normal human development and, while antibiotic treatment during pregnancy has an important role in controlling and preventing infections, it may have undesired effects regarding the maternal and fetoplacental microbiomes. We expect that microbiota manipulation in pregnancy, through the use of probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation, will be the subject of increasing clinical interest.

Keywords

Microbiome Gut Fetus Placenta Amniotic fluid Pregnancy Antibiotics Immune system

Background

The human body is home to a variety of microorganisms, termed the microbiota, consisting of up to 100 trillion bacterial cells, most of which reside in the gut. Large sequencing efforts, such as the Human Microbiome Project, have characterized the microbiota of the major sites (gut, mouth, skin, airways, and vagina) of the human body in healthy individuals and demonstrated that different body sites harbor diverse populations of microbes [1]. Our microbial companions are extremely important for the preservation of human health, and a growing number of studies describe how changes in these bacterial communities are linked to disease states such as obesity [2], diabetes [3], atherosclerosis [4], and autoimmune disorders [5], among others. These shifts in community structure are termed dysbiosis. Although dysbiosis is commonly associated with disease, it has also been described in healthy pregnancies in which there is a bidirectional relationship between pregnancy and the microbiome, whereby pregnancy affects the composition of the microbiome and the microbiome plays a role in maternal and child health outcomes [4]. These shifts in microbial composition occur in several sites in the body of the pregnant woman.

Maternal gut and vaginal microbiome changes during normal pregnancy and pregnancy complications

Pregnancy is characterized by profound hormonal, immunological, and metabolic changes aimed at supporting the growth of the fetoplacental unit [6]. Interestingly, a healthy pregnancy also induces dramatic changes in the maternal gut microbiota over the course of gestation, with a great expansion of diversity between individuals, an overall increase in Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, and reduced diversity within each microbiome. Similarly, the vaginal microbiome in pregnancy is different from that of non-pregnant women, with lesser diversity and richness, and with a dominance of Lactobacillus species, Clostridiales, Bacteroidales, and Actinomycetales [7]. When transferred to germ-free mice, third trimester microbiota induced greater adiposity and low-grade inflammation compared to first trimester microbiota [4], and it was recently suggested that alteration of the gut microbiota during pregnancy may also induce complications of pregnancy such as excessive maternal weight gain [8].

Maternal pregnancy complications significantly influence the bacterial composition and diversity of the stool microbiota of premature infants, with these changes persisting during the first year after birth [9]. Antibiotic usage during pregnancy undoubtedly affects the bacterial environment of the mother and of the fetus.

Bacteria of the fetoplacental unit – more fact than fiction?

We are rapidly progressing towards understanding the role of bacteria in novel target organs traditionally considered “sterile”, including the central nervous system [10], blood [11], the lower airways [12], the sub-epidermis [13], and the fetoplacental unit [14]. ‘The fetus lies in a sterile environment’ declared the French pediatrician Henry Tissier of the Pasteur Institute in 1900 [15]; since then, the placenta was traditionally believed to form a sterile barrier between the colonized maternal urogenital tract and the fetus. However, recent studies have challenged this assumption. The first demonstration of bacteria in the placenta in the modern scientific literature was published in 1982 by Kovalovszki et al. [16]. Subsequent publications have described the placental microbiome, using culture-dependent and -independent methods, and suggested its relative similarity to the oral microbiome, with bacteria such as Prevotella tannerae and Neisseria being present in the placenta [14] (Fig. 1). Specific components of the placental microbiome have been linked to particular pregnancy complications (Table 1, Fig. 2). Several mechanisms of amniotic fluid colonization have been proposed, including the translocation of vaginal bacteria [17] via the bloodstream or from the oral cavity [18]. Other possible routes include hematogenous spread or bacterial migration from the lower gastrointestinal tract to the lower genitourinary tract (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

The fetoplacental microbiome of healthy pregnancy and its origins. Bacteria and their genes have been isolated from human placentas, amniotic fluid, fetal membranes, and fetal gastrointestinal tract in healthy, normal pregnancies. These bacteria have three main routes of entry: the oro-fetoplacental route, the gastrointestinal-fetoplacental route, and the genitourinary-fetoplacental route. Examples of specific bacteria are indicated

Table 1

Summary of studies providing evidence for bacteria in the human fetoplacental unit in both complicated and uncomplicated pregnancies (marks published evidence)

Pregnancy state

Method

Placenta

Amniotic fluid

Fetal membranes

Reference

Normal pregnancy

Microscopy

[26, 3740]

Bacterial cultures

[16, 37, 39, 4150]

Culture independent methods

[14, 26, 37, 38, 41, 43, 45, 5062]

Premature rupture of membranes and preterm labor

Microscopy

 

[41, 61]

Bacterial cultures

 

[16, 20, 39, 44, 50, 52, 57, 6369]

Culture independent methods

[14, 16, 19, 20, 39, 42, 46, 50, 52, 53, 61, 70]

Intrauterine growth restriction

Bacterial cultures

 

 

[71]

Culture independent methods

 

 

[45, 72]

Pre-eclampsia

Bacterial cultures

 

[46, 72, 73]

Culture independent methods

 

[49, 51, 58, 62, 72, 73]

Fig. 2

The fetoplacental microbiome in various pregnancy complications involving the placenta. Examples of specific disease-associated species are shown. a Bacteria are found in the placenta (Streptococcus avermitilis), fetal membranes (Fusobacterium nucleatum), and amniotic fluid (Ureaplasma parvum) in cases of premature labor and premature rupture of membranes. b Bacteria are present in amniotic fluid (Mycoplasma hominis) in small-for-gestational-age (intrauterine growth restriction) fetuses. c Bacteria are present in the placenta (Gardnerella vaginalis) and amniotic fluid (Sneathia/Leptotrichia spp) in cases of preeclampsia. A pregnant woman is illustrated, exhibiting headache, edema, and petechia

The fetal membranes consist of the amniotic membrane, which contains the amniotic fluid, and the chorion, which is in proximity with the decidua parietalis. It has been shown that certain bacteria may be present in fetal membranes without leading to an inflammatory response [16]; Galask et al. [19] demonstrated that bacteria can traverse intact fetal membranes. Other bacteria resident in the fetal membranes are thought to play a role in amniotic inflammation, and thus in the initiation of labor [20].

Some of the studies described above demonstrated very low levels of bacterial DNA in the fetoplacental components. As detection methods become more sensitive, even more rigorous precautions must be taken against contamination when screening for bacterial colonization [21]. Nevertheless, despite the possibility of sample contamination, the physiological and beneficial presence of bacteria in the placenta is gaining widespread acceptance.

Antibiotic use in pregnancy - an opinion

Perhaps the most clinically relevant aspect of the pregnancy microbiome is antibiotic treatment during pregnancy. Antibiotics account for 80 % of all prescribed medication in pregnancy [22], yet surprisingly, few published human studies have carefully evaluated the direct effects of antibiotics during pregnancy on either the maternal or fetal microbiome, or evaluated long-term sequelae of such antibiotic use. Thus, there may be a reason for caution in prescribing antibiotics during pregnancy.

In pregnant NOD mice, antibiotic treatment caused alteration of gut microbiota and immunological changes in the intestine of the offspring [23]. In pregnant women, it was demonstrated that antibiotic administration during pregnancy leads to alterations in the vaginal microbiome prior to birth, with long-term effects on the early microbial colonization of the newborn [24] and an association with childhood obesity [25].

There are several components to this issue. Antibiotic treatment of infectious diseases is one of the greatest advances of modern medicine. Accordingly, antibiotics are widely prescribed during pregnancy as the most important modality for treating and preventing infections. It is estimated that one in five pregnant women in Europe is prescribed at least one antibiotic during pregnancy; in the United States, the rate is double [26]. Nevertheless, prescription of antibiotics should be carefully considered on an individual basis, weighing its benefits versus drawbacks for both the fetus and the mother. It has been shown that administration of certain antibiotics is linked to a significantly higher rate of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis, although antibiotic treatment is also associated with a reduced rate of lung complications and major cerebral abnormalities, relative to non-antibiotic treated controls [27]. A more recent study published in 2008 demonstrated that the prescription of antibiotics for women in spontaneous preterm labor with intact membranes was associated with an increased risk of cerebral palsy and functional impairment among their children at 7 years of age [28].

As discussed above, the healthy microbiome is important for maintaining a normal pregnancy and, therefore, it has been suggested that we may be using too many antibiotics during pregnancy [29]. A large systematic review concluded that antibiotics during the second and third trimester do not reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes and morbidity [30]. In addition, even a short course of antibiotics perturbs bacterial communities in human hosts [30]. In one study, it was shown that, within 30 days following cessation of antibiotic treatment, fecal microbiota reached an average similarity of 88 % to baseline, with the level rising to 89 % within 60 days [31]; however, the microbiota did not completely return to baseline over the timescale studied. Thus, antibiotics cause an immediate perturbation of the ecosystem, followed by incomplete recovery of the gut microbiome. The response to a given antibiotic is individualized, and may be influenced by prior exposure to the same drug. Accordingly, even a short course of antibiotics may sometimes have a long lasting residual effect on the microbiome, with possible metabolic or immune consequences.

The use of antibiotics during pregnancy has also been associated with increased risk of asthma in early childhood [3234], increased risk of childhood epilepsy, and increased risk of childhood obesity [25]. Of course, the argument could be made that the primary maternal infection was the cause for the increased risk of these conditions, rather than the treatment itself. Nevertheless, we suggest that antibiotics in pregnancy may affect the bacterial ecosystem of the mother as well as that of the fetus, and therefore that their use should be carefully considered based on what is known, and what remains unknown, regarding their effects.

Recent studies have demonstrated that priming of the immune system and microbiota-driven immune changes begin in utero and are not – as traditionally believed – induced postnatally by the newborn’s microbiota [35]. These new insights suggest that the maternal microbiota during pregnancy actually drives early postnatal innate immune development [36]. It is becoming clearer that the maternal microbiota, in concert with maternal antibodies, are important in preparing the fetus for host-microbial symbiosis later in life. The mechanisms of this phenomenon are now being explored and involve microbial molecular transfer (without any live bacteria). In addition, maternal antibodies have a dual effect, promoting pathogen neutralization whilst simultaneously enhancing microbial molecular transfer. Gomez de Aguero et al. [36] recently showed that pups of mothers transiently colonized during pregnancy have a greater capacity to avoid inflammation in response to bacterial molecules and penetration of intestinal microbes. Thus, the maternal microbiota plays a role in shaping the postnatal immune system and interferences with maternal microbiota during pregnancy may hinder the natural process of prenatal immune priming.

We believe that the issue of antibiotics during pregnancy is one of the greatest challenges of human microbiome research and certainly deserves increased focus in the form of observational and interventional studies to unravel the role of these drugs in human development.

Summary and future directions

One may argue for the importance of antibiotics during pregnancy to prevent or treat bacterial infections. Indeed, antibiotics have an important role in improving and promoting health in pregnant women. Nevertheless, as with other therapeutic modalities, overuse may be counter-productive. The realization that antibiotic use in pregnancy may interfere with the delicate balance between the pregnant woman’s microbiota, which is important for normal fetal development, may gradually decrease the enormous, and possibly excessive, utilization of these drugs during pregnancy. In case of proven maternal infection, narrow spectrum antibiotics should be preferred due to their less extensive effects on the microbiome, taking into account the association of prenatal antibiotics with increased risk of childhood asthma, epilepsy, and obesity. Future studies should focus on maternal microbiome manipulations such as personalized probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation, and their effect on pregnancy outcome, as well as on the use of specific microbial profiling for diagnosis of pregnancy complications and prediction of long-term outcomes of newborn and maternal health.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Noa Ilan for preparing the illustrations.

Funding

The work of OK is supported by the Marie Curie International Reintegration Grant (FP7-PEOPLE-2013-CIG-630956), the Ministry of Health, State of Israel (3-0000-10451), and the Canadian-Israel Health Initiative, jointly funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Israel Science Foundation, the International Development Research Centre, Canada, and the Azrieli Foundation.

Authors’ contributions

AAK and OK wrote the manuscript and agreed upon the final version of the paper.

Author information

AAK is a physician-scientist, head of the Pediatric Hematology and Blood Coagulation Service at the Galilee Medical Center. He is currently performing PhD research at the Microbiome Research Lab, Bar-Ilan University. OK is a microbiologist, a principal investigator involved in human microbiome research, and head of the Microbiome Research Lab at Bar-Ilan University.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Blood Coagulation Service and Pediatric Hematology Clinic, Galilee Medical Center
(2)
Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee, Bar-Ilan University

References

  1. Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012;486(7402):207–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ley RE. Obesity and the human microbiome. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010;26(1):5–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Tilg H, Moschen AR. Microbiota and diabetes: an evolving relationship. Gut. 2014;63(9):1513–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Koren O, Goodrich JK, Cullender TC, Spor A, Laitinen K, Backhed HK, Gonzalez A, Werner JJ, Angenent LT, Knight R, et al. Host remodeling of the gut microbiome and metabolic changes during pregnancy. Cell. 2012;150(3):470–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Markle JG, Frank DN, Mortin-Toth S, Robertson CE, Feazel LM, Rolle-Kampczyk U, von Bergen M, McCoy KD, Macpherson AJ, Danska JS. Sex differences in the gut microbiome drive hormone-dependent regulation of autoimmunity. Science. 2013;339(6123):1084–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Newbern D, Freemark M. Placental hormones and the control of maternal metabolism and fetal growth. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2011;18(6):409–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Aagaard K, Riehle K, Ma J, Segata N, Mistretta TA, Coarfa C, Raza S, Rosenbaum S, Van den Veyver I, Milosavljevic A, et al. A metagenomic approach to characterization of the vaginal microbiome signature in pregnancy. PLoS One. 2012;7(6), e36466.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhang D, Huang Y, Ye D. Intestinal dysbiosis: an emerging cause of pregnancy complications? Med Hypotheses. 2015;84(3):223–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chernikova DA, Koestler DC, Hoen AG, Housman ML, Hibberd PL, Moore JH, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, Zain-Ul-Abideen M, Madan JC. Fetal exposures and perinatal influences on the stool microbiota of premature infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(1):99–105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Branton WG, Ellestad KK, Maingat F, Wheatley BM, Rud E, Warren RL, Holt RA, Surette MG, Power C. Brain microbial populations in HIV/AIDS: alpha-proteobacteria predominate independent of host immune status. PLoS One. 2013;8(1), e54673.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Potgieter M, Bester J, Kell DB, Pretorius E. The dormant blood microbiome in chronic, inflammatory diseases. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2015;39(4):567–91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Marsland BJ, Gollwitzer ES. Host-microorganism interactions in lung diseases. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(12):827–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Nakatsuji T, Chiang HI, Jiang SB, Nagarajan H, Zengler K, Gallo RL. The microbiome extends to subepidermal compartments of normal skin. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1431.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Aagaard K, Ma J, Antony KM, Ganu R, Petrosino J, Versalovic J. The placenta harbors a unique microbiome. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(237):237ra265.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Tissier H. Recherches sur la flore intestinale des nourrissons (e'tat normal et pathologique). Paris: G. Carre and C. Naud. 1900.Google Scholar
  16. Kovalovszki L, Villanyi Z, Pataki I, Veszelowvsky I, Nagy ZB. Isolation of aerobic bacteria from the placenta. Acta Paediatr Acad Sci Hung. 1982;23(3):357–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371(9606):75–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Goepfert AR, Jeffcoat MK, Andrews WW, Faye-Petersen O, Cliver SP, Goldenberg RL, Hauth JC. Periodontal disease and upper genital tract inflammation in early spontaneous preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(4):777–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Galask RP, Varner MW, Petzold CR, Wilbur SL. Bacterial attachment to the chorioamniotic membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;148(7):915–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Doyle RM, Alber DG, Jones HE, Harris K, Fitzgerald F, Peebles D, Klein N. Term and preterm labour are associated with distinct microbial community structures in placental membranes which are independent of mode of delivery. Placenta. 2014;35(12):1099–101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kliman HJ. Comment on “the placenta harbors a unique microbiome”. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(254):254le254.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Bookstaver PB, Bland CM, Griffin B, Stover KR, Eiland LS, McLaughlin M. A review of antibiotic use in pregnancy. Pharmacotherapy. 2015;35(11):1052–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Tormo-Badia N, Hakansson A, Vasudevan K, Molin G, Ahrne S, Cilio CM. Antibiotic treatment of pregnant non-obese diabetic mice leads to altered gut microbiota and intestinal immunological changes in the offspring. Scand J Immunol. 2014;80(4):250–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Stokholm J, Schjorring S, Eskildsen CE, Pedersen L, Bischoff AL, Folsgaard N, Carson CG, Chawes BL, Bonnelykke K, Molgaard A, et al. Antibiotic use during pregnancy alters the commensal vaginal microbiota. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(7):629–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mueller NT, Whyatt R, Hoepner L, Oberfield S, Dominguez-Bello MG, Widen EM, Hassoun A, Perera F, Rundle A. Prenatal exposure to antibiotics, cesarean section and risk of childhood obesity. Int J Obesity. 2015;39(4):665–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Roberts DJ, Celi AC, Riley LE, Onderdonk AB, Boyd TK, Johnson LC, Lieberman E. Acute histologic chorioamnionitis at term: nearly always noninfectious. PLoS One. 2012;7(3), e31819.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Kenyon SL, Taylor DJ, Tarnow-Mordi W, ORACLE Collaborative Group. Broad-spectrum antibiotics for preterm, prelabour rupture of fetal membranes: the ORACLE I randomised trial. ORACLE Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2001;357(9261):979–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kenyon S, Pike K, Jones DR, Brocklehurst P, Marlow N, Salt A, Taylor DJ. Childhood outcomes after prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with spontaneous preterm labour: 7-year follow-up of the ORACLE II trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9646):1319–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ledger WJ, Blaser MJ. Are we using too many antibiotics during pregnancy? BJOG. 2013;120(12):1450–2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Flenady V, Hawley G, Stock OM, Kenyon S, Badawi N. Prophylactic antibiotics for inhibiting preterm labour with intact membranes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;12, CD000246.Google Scholar
  31. De La Cochetiere MF, Durand T, Lepage P, Bourreille A, Galmiche JP, Dore J. Resilience of the dominant human fecal microbiota upon short-course antibiotic challenge. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(11):5588–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Lapin B, Piorkowski J, Ownby D, Freels S, Chavez N, Hernandez E, Wagner-Cassanova C, Pelzel D, Vergara C, Persky V. Relationship between prenatal antibiotic use and asthma in at-risk children. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015;114(3):203–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Metsala J, Lundqvist A, Virta LJ, Kaila M, Gissler M, Virtanen SM. Prenatal and post-natal exposure to antibiotics and risk of asthma in childhood. Clin Exp Allergy. 2015;45(1):137–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Stensballe LG, Simonsen J, Jensen SM, Bonnelykke K, Bisgaard H. Use of antibiotics during pregnancy increases the risk of asthma in early childhood. J Pediatr. 2013;162(4):832–8. e3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rakoff-Nahoum S, Kong Y, Kleinstein SH, Subramanian S, Ahern PP, Gordon JI, Medzhitov R. Analysis of gene-environment interactions in postnatal development of the mammalian intestine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(7):1929–36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Gomez de Aguero M, Ganal-Vonarburg SC, Fuhrer T, Rupp S, Uchimura Y, Li H, Steinert A, Heikenwalder M, Hapfelmeier S, Sauer U, et al. The maternal microbiota drives early postnatal innate immune development. Science. 2016;351(6279):1296–302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Bearfield C, Davenport ES, Sivapathasundaram V, Allaker RP. Possible association between amniotic fluid micro-organism infection and microflora in the mouth. BJOG. 2002;109(5):527–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Cahill RJ, Tan S, Dougan G, O’Gaora P, Pickard D, Kennea N, Sullivan MH, Feldman RG, Edwards AD. Universal DNA primers amplify bacterial DNA from human fetal membranes and link Fusobacterium nucleatum with prolonged preterm membrane rupture. Mol Hum Reprod. 2005;11(10):761–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim MJ, Romero R, Gervasi MT, Kim JS, Yoo W, Lee DC, Mittal P, Erez O, Kusanovic JP, Hassan SS, et al. Widespread microbial invasion of the chorioamniotic membranes is a consequence and not a cause of intra-amniotic infection. Lab Invest. 2009;89(8):924–36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Stout MJ, Conlon B, Landeau M, Lee I, Bower C, Zhao Q, Roehl KA, Nelson DM, Macones GA, Mysorekar IU. Identification of intracellular bacteria in the basal plate of the human placenta in term and preterm gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(3):e1–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Barak S, Oettinger-Barak O, Machtei EE, Sprecher H, Ohel G. Evidence of periopathogenic microorganisms in placentas of women with preeclampsia. J Periodontol. 2007;78(4):670–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Bhola K, Al-Kindi H, Fadia M, Kent AL, Collignon P, Dahlstrom JE. Placental cultures in the era of peripartum antibiotic use. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;48(2):179–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Daoud GA, Suzuki Y, Yamamoto T, Suzuki T, Suzumori N, Tanemura M. Establishment of a polymerase chain reaction method for detection of Escherichia coli in amniotic fluid in patients with chorioamnionitis. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2008;24(2):132–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Gomez R, Romero R, Nien JK, Medina L, Carstens M, Kim YM, Espinoza J, Chaiworapongsa T, Gonzalez R, Iams JD,et al. Antibiotic administration to patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes does not eradicate intra-amniotic infection. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;20(2):167–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Nguyen DP, Gerber S, Hohlfeld P, Sandrine G, Witkin SS. Mycoplasma hominis in mid-trimester amniotic fluid: relation to pregnancy outcome. J Perinat Med. 2004;32(4):323–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Onderdonk AB, Hecht JL, McElrath TF, Delaney ML, Allred EN, Leviton A, Investigators ES. Colonization of second-trimester placenta parenchyma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(1):52. e1–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Pankuch GA, Appelbaum PC, Lorenz RP, Botti JJ, Schachter J, Naeye RL. Placental microbiology and histology and the pathogenesis of chorioamnionitis. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;64(6):802–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Patrascu A, Berceanu S, Popescu CF, Gheorman V, Berceanu C. Clinical and histopathological correlations of the modifications of fetal membranes in amniochorial infection. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2009;50(1):67–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Queiros da Mota V, Prodhom G, Yan P, Hohlfheld P, Greub G, Rouleau C. Correlation between placental bacterial culture results and histological chorioamnionitis: a prospective study on 376 placentas. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66(3):243–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Romero R, Miranda J, Chaiworapongsa T, Chaemsaithong P, Gotsch F, Dong Z, Ahmed AI, Yoon BH, Hassan SS, Kim CJ,et al. A novel molecular microbiologic technique for the rapid diagnosis of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and intra-amniotic infection in preterm labor with intact membranes. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014;71(4):330–58.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Amarasekara R, Jayasekara RW, Senanayake H, Dissanayake VH. Microbiome of the placenta in pre-eclampsia supports the role of bacteria in the multifactorial cause of pre-eclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(5):662–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Antony KM, Ma J, Mitchell KB, Racusin DA, Versalovic J, Aagaard K. The preterm placental microbiome varies in association with excess maternal gestational weight gain. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(5):653. e1–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Blanchard A, Hamrick W, Duffy L, Baldus K, Cassell GH. Use of the polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycoplasma fermentans and Mycoplasma genitalium in the urogenital tract and amniotic fluid. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;17 Suppl 1:S272–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Clark P, Trickett A, Stark D, Vowels M. Factors affecting microbial contamination rate of cord blood collected for transplantation. Transfusion. 2012;52(8):1770–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Gerber S, Vial Y, Hohlfeld P, Witkin SS. Detection of Ureaplasma urealyticum in second-trimester amniotic fluid by polymerase chain reaction correlates with subsequent preterm labor and delivery. J Infect Dis. 2003;187(3):518–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Harvey BS, Koeuth T, Versalovic J, Woods CR, Lupski JR. Vertical transmission of Citrobacter diversus documented by DNA fingerprinting. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1995;16(10):564–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Hitti J, Riley DE, Krohn MA, Hillier SL, Agnew KJ, Krieger JN, Eschenbach DA. Broad-spectrum bacterial rDNA polymerase chain reaction assay for detecting amniotic fluid infection among women in premature labor. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24(6):1228–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Jalava J, Mantymaa ML, Ekblad U, Toivanen P, Skurnik M, Lassila O, Alanen A. Bacterial 16S rDNA polymerase chain reaction in the detection of intra-amniotic infection. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103(7):664–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Markenson GR, Adams LA, Hoffman DE, Reece MT. Prevalence of Mycoplasma bacteria in amniotic fluid at the time of genetic amniocentesis using the polymerase chain reaction. J Reprod Med. 2003;48(10):775–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Mostajeran F, Arbabi B. Is there any difference between preeclamptic and healthy pregnant women regarding the presence of periopathogenic bacteria in the placenta? Int J Prev Med. 2013;4(3):322–6.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Satokari R, Gronroos T, Laitinen K, Salminen S, Isolauri E. Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus DNA in the human placenta. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009;48(1):8–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Watt S, Lanotte P, Mereghetti L, Moulin-Schouleur M, Picard B, Quentin R. Escherichia coli strains from pregnant women and neonates: intraspecies genetic distribution and prevalence of virulence factors. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(5):1929–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Gomez R, Romero R, Nien JK, Medina L, Carstens M, Kim YM, Chaiworapongsa T, Espinoza J, Gonzalez R. Idiopathic vaginal bleeding during pregnancy as the only clinical manifestation of intrauterine infection. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;18(1):31–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Han YW, Ikegami A, Bissada NF, Herbst M, Redline RW, Ashmead GG. Transmission of an uncultivated Bergeyella strain from the oral cavity to amniotic fluid in a case of preterm birth. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(4):1475–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Hassan S, Romero R, Hendler I, Gomez R, Khalek N, Espinoza J, Nien JK, Berry SM, Bujold E, Camacho N, et al. A sonographic short cervix as the only clinical manifestation of intra-amniotic infection. J Perinat Med. 2006;34(1):13–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Kim KW, Romero R, Park HS, Park CW, Shim SS, Jun JK, Yoon BH. A rapid matrix metalloproteinase-8 bedside test for the detection of intraamniotic inflammation in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(3):292. e1–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Kirchner L, Helmer H, Heinze G, Wald M, Brunbauer M, Weninger M, Zaknun D. Amnionitis with Ureaplasma urealyticum or other microbes leads to increased morbidity and prolonged hospitalization in very low birth weight infants. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;134(1):44–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Musilova I, Pliskova L, Kutova R, Jacobsson B, Paterova P, Kacerovsky M. Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnancies complicated by preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(7):1036–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Yoon BH, Romero R, Park JS, Kim M, Oh SY, Kim CJ, Jun JK. The relationship among inflammatory lesions of the umbilical cord (funisitis), umbilical cord plasma interleukin 6 concentration, amniotic fluid infection, and neonatal sepsis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(5):1124–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Han YW, Shen T, Chung P, Buhimschi IA, Buhimschi CS. Uncultivated bacteria as etiologic agents of intra-amniotic inflammation leading to preterm birth. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(1):38–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. DiGiulio DB, Gervasi MT, Romero R, Vaisbuch E, Mazaki-Tovi S, Kusanovic JP, Seok KS, Gomez R, Mittal P, Gotsch F, et al. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in pregnancies with small-for-gestational-age fetuses. J Perinat Med. 2010;38(5):495–502.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  72. DiGiulio DB, Gervasi M, Romero R, Mazaki-Tovi S, Vaisbuch E, Kusanovic JP, Seok KS, Gomez R, Mittal P, Gotsch F, et al. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in preeclampsia as assessed by cultivation and sequence-based methods. J Perinat Med. 2010;38(5):503–13.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Onderdonk AB, Delaney ML, DuBois AM, Allred EN, Leviton A. Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborns (ELGAN) Study Investigators. Detection of bacteria in placental tissues obtained from extremely low gestational age neonates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(1):110. e1–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016