Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more
Open Access

Low levels of IgM antibodies recognizing oxidation-specific epitopes are associated with human non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

  • Tim Hendrikx1, 2, 3,
  • Martin L. Watzenböck2, 3,
  • Sofie M. A. Walenbergh1,
  • Shahzada Amir2, 3,
  • Sabrina Gruber2, 3,
  • Maria Ozsvar Kozma2, 3,
  • Heike I. Grabsch1,
  • Ger H. Koek1,
  • Marieke J. Pierik1,
  • Katharina Staufer2,
  • Michael Trauner2,
  • Satish C. Kalhan4,
  • Daisy Jonkers1,
  • Marten H. Hofker5,
  • Christoph J. Binder2, 3 and
  • Ronit Shiri-Sverdlov1Email author
BMC Medicine201614:107

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0652-0

Received: 24 February 2016

Accepted: 29 June 2016

Published: 22 July 2016

Abstract

Background

Lipid oxidation of membrane phospholipids is accompanied by the formation of oxidation-specific epitopes (OSE). These epitopes are recognized by specific antibodies and represent danger-associated molecular patterns that are generated during chronic inflammatory processes. In a murine model for hepatic inflammation during non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), increased antibody levels targeting OSE were found to be protective. Here, our aim was to determine an association between OSE-specific antibody titers and NAFLD in humans.

Methods

IgM and IgG levels with specificity for various OSE were assessed in the plasma of patients with NAFLD (n = 71) and healthy controls (n = 68). Antibody titers were comprehensively analyzed in patients with NAFLD after classification by histological evaluation of liver biopsies. Statistical analysis was performed to determine significant correlations and odds ratios. To study the specificity for NAFLD, plasma antibody titers were measured in patients with hepatitis C (n = 40) and inflammatory bowel disease (n = 62).

Results

IgM titers against OSE were lower in patients with NAFLD compared to controls. Further biopsy-based classification of patients with NAFLD did not show any difference in IgM levels. Plasma IgM titers towards the P1 mimotope demonstrated an inverse correlation with markers for obesity, systemic inflammation, and liver damage. In contrast, hepatitis C and increased disease activity during inflammatory bowel disease was not associated with reduced IgM titers.

Conclusions

Our data highlight the importance of immune recognition of OSE by IgM antibodies in the pathophysiology of NAFLD.

Keywords

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitisLipid oxidationAdaptive immune responseFatty liverIgM

Background

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) constitutes a spectrum of liver diseases characterized by hepatic lipid accumulation (steatosis), which when combined with hepatic inflammation is known as non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Steatosis is generally considered to be a benign and reversible condition that is present in about two thirds of patients with the metabolic syndrome [1]. The presence of inflammation in a fatty liver is thought to drive disease progression, including the development of fibrosis, cirrhosis, or hepatocellular carcinoma, ultimately requiring liver transplantation [2]. The mechanisms leading to hepatic inflammation are currently not fully understood. Hence, therapy options are limited and accurate, early, non-invasive diagnostic tools are lacking [3].

Immune reactions triggered by oxidative stress have been shown to be involved during the progression of NAFLD to fibrosis [4]. Moreover, oxidized low-density lipoproteins (OxLDL) are known to play a major role in atherosclerosis and various other related metabolic disturbances, such as NASH [5]. The oxidation of LDL is accompanied by the formation of various epitopes on the surface of OxLDL, called oxidation-specific epitopes (OSE) [6]. These epitopes include protein adducts with lipid peroxidation breakdown products, such as malondialdehyde (MDA), malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde (MAA), and 4-hydroxynonenal, as well as with phosphocholine (PC)-containing oxidized phospholipids [6]. OSE on the surface of OxLDL are recognized by both innate and acquired humoral immunity, including specific antibodies that are found in the plasma of humans and animal models [6, 7]. Evidence for a protective role of OSE-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies in NASH is based on our findings that increased IgM levels protect from hepatic inflammation in hyperlipidemic mice [8]. To summarize, immunized Ldlr −/− mice with heat-inactivated pneumococci, which induce the production of anti-OxLDL IgM due to molecular mimicry with OxLDL, had less hepatic inflammation than control mice after a Western diet. Moreover, we recently showed that increased levels of IgM antibodies as a result of Siglec-G deficiency inhibits diet-induced hepatic inflammation and atherosclerosis in Ldlr −/− mice [9]. However, the relationship between plasma antibody levels targeting OSE and hepatic inflammation during NAFLD has not been investigated in humans so far.

Here, we aimed to determine an association between plasma antibodies targeting OSE and NAFLD in humans. For this purpose, IgM and IgG antibody titers against different model epitopes of oxidized lipids were measured in the plasma of patients with NAFLD and compared to those in control subjects. Liver biopsies from patients with biopsy-proven NASH were examined for the presence of MDA epitopes by immunohistochemistry. Additionally, to test the specificity of our findings for NAFLD, antibody levels were determined in two cohorts consisting of patients with hepatitis C and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our data highlight the importance of immune recognition of OSE by IgM antibodies in NAFLD and suggest that low IgM levels against end products of lipid oxidation during fatty liver disease are a consequence of obesity.

Methods

Antigens and antibodies

Human MDA-LDL, MAA-LDL, CuOx-LDL, and PC-BSA were prepared as previously described [10]. MDA2 (a kind gift from Dr J. L. Witztum, San Diego, CA, USA) is a murine IgG monoclonal antibody against MDA-lysine epitopes. Linear peptide P1 (HSWTNSWMATFL) was purchased from Peptide 2.0 Inc. (Chantilly, VA, USA).

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry for MDA using the monoclonal antibody MDA2 was performed on 10 liver biopsies diagnosed as NASH, originating from the Maastricht Pathology Tissue Collection. Collection, storage, and use of tissue and patient data were performed in agreement with the “Code for Proper Secondary Use of Human Tissue in the Netherlands” (http://www.federa.org). The staining was performed as described previously (antibody dilution 1:2000) and biopsies were evaluated for the presence of MDA [10].

Chemiluminescent ELISA

Chemiluminescent ELISA was performed as previously described [10]. In brief, purified anti-human IgM (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA, USA) and antigens (MDA-LDL, MAA-LDL, CuOx-LDL, PC-BSA) at concentrations of 5 μg/ml in 50 μl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-EDTA were added to each well of a 96-well white, round-bottom microtitration plate (MicrofluorII roundbottom; Thermo, Rochester, New York, USA) and incubated overnight at 4 °C. P1 peptide (Peptide 2.0 Inc.) was coated at 10 μg/ml in NaHCO3 (pH 8.5) coating buffer and incubated overnight at 4 °C. After washing and blocking with Tris-buffered saline (TBS) with or without EDTA (pH 7.4, containing 1 % bovine serum albumin (BSA), 30 min at room temperature), the plate was incubated with plasma samples in their respective dilutions (total IgM: 1:40,000; MDA-LDL, MAA-LDL, P-1, Cu-OxLDL, PC-BSA IgM/IgG: 1:200) in 1 % BSA in TBS with EDTA (pH 7.4) for 2 h at room temperature or overnight at 4 °C. Alkaline phosphatase (AP)-labeled goat anti-human IgM (μ-chain specific; Sigma-Aldrich, Vienna, Austria; 1:50,000 in TBS-BSA) or AP-labeled goat anti-human IgG (γ-chain specific; Sigma-Aldrich, Vienna, Austria; 1:50,000 in TBS-BSA) was used for detection. AP-conjugated secondary reagents were detected using Lumi-Phos (Lumigen, Southfield, Michigan, USA; 33 % solution in water) and a Synergy 2 Luminometer (BioTek, Winooski, Vermont, USA). Washing steps were performed on an ELx405 Select Deep Well Microplate Washer (BioTek, Winooski, Vermont, USA) with PBS or PBS-EDTA. Internal controls were included on each microtiter plate to detect potential variations between microtiter plates. The intra-assay coefficients of variation for all assays were 5–15 %.

NAFLD cohort for antibody measurements

Healthy controls (n = 68) were recruited by advertisement and patients classified as NAFLD (n = 53) were recruited from the metabolic clinics of the Cleveland Clinic and MetroHealth Medical Center in Cleveland, OH, USA. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the Cleveland Clinic and MetroHealth Medical Center. A detailed clinical history was obtained for each participant, followed by a physical examination. Hepatic ultrasonography was performed on all participants by the same investigator (S. Dasarathy) in order to confirm the absence of steatosis in controls. Moreover, plasma transaminase levels were determined in all participants. Where steatosis and increased plasma transaminase levels were detected, a liver biopsy was taken for further characterization of NAFLD. Liver biopsies from patients were reviewed in a blinded manner by the same pathologist and NASH was defined as an NAFLD activity score ≥4 and a histologic diagnosis of NASH by the pathologist. Participants with other forms of chronic liver disease were excluded by screening for autoimmune liver disease (autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, sclerosing cholangitis), for metabolic liver disease (hemochromatosis, Wilson’s disease), for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, and for viral hepatitis (hepatitis B and hepatitis C). Participants with a history of daily alcohol intake (women >20 g, men >30 g), intravenous drug use, or a history of bowel surgery were also excluded. None of the participants were on any medications known to cause hepatic steatosis or taking vitamin supplements. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants after having the procedure fully explained. Blood and liver sampling was done as described before [1113]. Plasma samples were used to perform the antibody determinations. Relevant clinical data, including gender, age, weight, and height, together with inflammatory and liver blood test results, were collected at the time of liver biopsy and are represented in Table 1. The body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the formula: weight (kg)/[height (m)]2. Further clinical and biochemical data for all patients are summarized in Table 1 (Additional file 1).
Table 1

Clinical and biological characteristics of patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis for antibody measurements

 

Participant characteristics (mean ± SD)

 

Controls

(n = 68)

NAFLD

(simple steatosis) (n = 18)

NAFLD

(NASH) (n = 53)

Male/female

27/41

9/9

24/29

Age (y)

40.9 ± 12

45.7 ± 13

45.9 ± 10

BMI (kg/m2)

26.3 ± 4.9

33.6 ± 5.6

34.3 ± 4.7

Waist circumference (cm)

89.4 ± 13.7

108.5 ± 12.9

109.0 ± 14.3

Triglycerides (mg/dL)

  

Median

75

151

160

Interquartile range

48

66

118.5

Cholesterol (mg/dL)

181.33 ± 32.9

197.8 ± 53.2

196.2 ± 43.5

HDL (mg/dL)

54.8 ± 17.7

41.44 ± 8.0

42.87 ± 8.9

LDL (mg/dL)

105.65 ± 26.9

135.3 ± 47.2

122.9 ± 36.3

 

Markers of inflammation and liver blood tests (mean (IQR))

TNF-α (pg/ml)

2.5 (0.7)

3 (2.3)

3 (1.9)

MCP-1 (pg/ml)

96.9 (27)

122.4 (24.05)

120.1 (37.95)

IL-1β (pg/ml)

0.42 (0.87)

0.27 (0.36)

0.17 (0.64)

IL-6 (pg/ml)

13.2 (35.8)

16.1 (8.1)

24.5 (45.25)

IL-8 (pg/ml)

5.4 (4)

5.34 (3.5)

7.7 (8.05)

γGT (IU/L)

-

51.6 (22.7)

55.6 (32)

Leptin

11.1 (8.8)

23.0 (15.8)

30.5 (18.5)

AST (IU/L)

21 (9)

28 (11.8)

49 (56.5)

ALT (IU/L)

18 (8)

38 (22.8)

66 (99.5)

AST/ALT ratio

1.3 (0.25)

0.8 (0.2)

0.8 (0.4)

AST aspartate transaminase, ALT alanine transaminase, BMI body mass index, γGT gamma-glutamyltransferase, HDL high-density lipoprotein, IL interleukin, IQR interquartile range, LDL low-density lipoprotein, MCP-1 monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, NAFLD non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, NASH non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, TNF-α tumor necrosis factor alpha

Hepatitis C cohort

Healthy controls (n = 20) were recruited by advertisement and patients with chronic hepatitis C (n = 20) were recruited from the Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the Medical University of Vienna. Hepatic ultrasonography and liver biopsy was performed on all participants prior to scheduled antiviral therapy. Moreover, plasma transaminase levels were determined in all participants. Liver biopsies of patients were reviewed in a blinded manner by two independent pathologists. Participants with other forms of chronic liver disease or with a history of daily alcohol intake were excluded by screening. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants after having the procedure fully explained. Further clinical data for the patients are summarized in Table 2 (Additional file 2).
Table 2

Clinical characteristics of patients with hepatitis C

 

Participant characteristics (mean ± SD)

 

Controls

(n = 20)

Hepatitis C

(n = 20)

Male/female

12/8

11/9

Age (y)

48.4 ± 14

48.2 ± 12

Triglycerides (mg/dL)

95.1 ± 52.3

111.25 ± 57.3

Cholesterol (mg/dL)

197.05 ± 31

162.6 ± 40.9

HDL (mg/dL)

71.2 ± 14.5

43.2 ± 16.2

LDL (mg/dL)

106.83 ± 27.1

97.1 ± 38.5

γGT (IU/L)

18.5 ± 6.5

265.1 ± 344.1

AST (IU/L)

24.9 ± 13

113.7 ± 94

ALT (IU/L)

22.7 ± 10.4

127.1 ± 86.3

AST/ALT ratio

1.13 ± 0.27

0.95 ± 0.55

AST aspartate transaminase, ALT alanine transaminase, γGT gamma-glutamyltransferase, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Between September 2009 and December 2010, consecutive patients with IBD were recruited during routine follow-up at the Gastroenterology Outpatient Clinic of the MUMC+ and participated in a prospective 1-year follow-up study [14]. All patients had an established diagnosis of IBD based on clinical, endoscopic, histological, and/or radiological criteria. Demographic and clinical data were obtained using the MUMC+ computer-based medical registration database. Disease phenotype at the time of diagnosis was determined by the Montreal classification [15]. The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of MUMC+ and written informed consent was obtained prior to participation. A subset of patients who underwent an endoscopy for clinical reasons was included for the present study. Disease activity was assessed during endoscopy by an experienced gastroenterologist (MP) as inactive (0), mild (1), moderate (2), or severe (3) (Additional file 3).

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are presented as means and standard deviations or as medians and interquartile ranges for skewed distributions. Categorical data are presented as absolute frequencies and percentages. Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test (for non-normally distributed data) was used to compare a variable between two subgroups. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the association between P1-specific IgM levels and NAFLD in the specific cohort after adjusting for age, gender, BMI, and total IgM levels. All reported p-values are two-tailed and considered significant at p < 0.05. Statistical procedures were carried out using Graphad Prism 6 or IBM SPSS 20.

Results

MDA epitopes are present in livers of patients with NASH

To determine whether OSE are generated during the spectrum of NAFLD, immunohistochemical staining for MDA epitopes with the monoclonal antibody MDA2 was performed on liver biopsies of patients with biopsy-proven NASH. As illustrated in Fig. 1ac, small clusters of MDA2-positive staining were detected between swollen hepatocytes of liver biopsies from patients with NASH, indicating the presence of MDA epitopes.
Fig. 1

Malondialdehyde (MDA) epitopes in livers of patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and relationship between plasma immunoglobulin M (IgM) titers and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Immunohistochemical detection of MDA epitopes in liver sections (magnification 20×) of a a negative control and b two patients with NASH – arrows indicate localization of MDA2-positive staining in the liver tissue. Plasma IgM antibody titers against c MDA-low-density lipoprotein (LDL), d malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde (MAA)-LDL, e P1 mimotope, f CuOx-LDL, g PC-BSA, and h total IgM levels in patients with NAFLD and healthy controls. i Ratio of anti-P1 IgM titers to total IgM levels in patients with NAFLD and controls. Data are expressed in log10 relative light units (RLU)/100 ms. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

IgM antibody titers towards different OSE are lower in patients with NAFLD

To investigate the potential relationship between antibodies specifically targeting epitopes of OxLDL and NAFLD, IgM and IgG antibody titers against MDA, MAA (an immunodominant advanced MDA-lysine adduct), P1 (a highly specific peptide mimotope of MAA [10]), Cu-OxLDL, and PC-BSA were measured in the plasma of patients with NAFLD (n = 71) and control participants with confirmed absence of steatosis (n = 68). The values of the different measurements were tested for normality with Shapiro–Wilks test and the results indicated that data were not normally distributed for most of the measurements in either of the groups (Additional file 4: Table S1). Therefore, all data were logarithmically transformed (log10) and represented using a log10 scale in Fig. 1. The observed relative lights units can be found in Additional file 4: Table S2.

In line with our expectations, patients with NAFLD had significantly lower IgM titers than controls against MDA-LDL (4.755 versus 4.819 log10 RLU/100 ms, p = 0.0019; Fig. 1c, Additional file 4: Table S2), MAA-LDL (4.801 versus 4.868 log10 RLU/100 ms, p = 0.0026; Fig. 1d, Additional file 4: Table S2), P1 (3.877 versus 4.08 log10 RLU/100 ms, p < 0.0001; Fig. 1e, Additional file 4: Table S2), CuOx-LDL (4.46 versus 4.612 log10 RLU/100 ms, p = 0.0004; Fig. 1f, Additional file 4: Table S2), and PC-BSA (4.255 versus 4.383 log10 RLU/100 ms, p = 0.0096; Fig. 1g, Additional file 4: Table S2). No differences were found in specific IgG antibody titers towards the different epitopes of OxLDL in patients with NAFLD compared to controls (Additional file 4: Table S3).

Interestingly, total IgM antibodies were also significantly lower in patients with NAFLD compared to healthy participants (3.773 versus 3.712 log10 RLU/100 ms, p = 0.0044; Fig. 1h, Additional file 4: Table S2). Notably, IgM titers towards the specific P1 mimotope, which showed the strongest reduction in patients with NAFLD compared to controls, remained significant after adjusting for total IgM levels (0.3074 versus 0.1658 (ratio), p = 0.0002, Fig. 1i). These data point towards a negative association between IgM antibodies and oxidized lipids and fatty liver disease, and indicate an important role for lipid oxidation in NAFLD.

Plasma anti-P1 IgM levels are reduced in the early phase of NAFLD and are not influenced by inflammation or fibrosis

Because anti-P1 IgM levels showed the strongest reduction in patients with NAFLD and due to its high clinical reproducibility, further analyses were conducted using the anti-P1 IgM measurements. To determine in which phase in the disease spectrum of NAFLD that plasma IgM titers towards P1 are reduced, participants were divided according to their ALT levels (<25, 25–50, >50 IU/L) because a normal ALT level is expected to be <50 IU/L. Interestingly, P1-IgM levels were reduced in participants with moderately elevated ALT levels (25–50 IU/L) or high ALT levels (>50 IU/L) when compared with the P1-IgM levels of participants with ALT levels <25 IU/L (Fig. 2a). Moreover, more than 90 % of control participants were classified as having low ALT levels. These data suggest that IgM titers are already lower in early phases of NAFLD, before liver damage is detected based on ALT levels.
Fig. 2

Relationship between plasma P1-immunoglobulin (IgM) levels and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) upon further characterization of liver biopsies. a IgM titers towards P1 in controls and patients with NAFLD grouped based on their ALT levels. b Plasma IgM antibody titers against the P1 mimotope in patients with NAFLD in which the liver biopsy was evaluated and scored as simple steatosis versus non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Anti-P1 IgM titers after scoring liver biopsies for c steatosis, d inflammation, e hepatocyte ballooning, f applying the NAFLD activity score (NAS), and g scoring fibrosis. Data are expressed in relative light units (RLU)/100 ms and presented as means. **p < 0.01

Next, we evaluated the relationship between IgM to P1 and different classifications based on histological scoring of liver biopsies taken from patients with NAFLD. First, the potential of anti-P1 IgM to distinguish simple steatosis from NASH was tested. Whereas IgM titers were lower in NAFLD compared with controls, no difference was observed in specific IgM levels between patients with steatosis and NASH (Fig. 2b). Moreover, no differences were observed in plasma P1-IgM titers after classifying the patients according to a score for steatosis (Fig. 2c), inflammation (Fig. 2d), hepatocyte ballooning (Fig. 2e), the NAFLD activity score (NAS) (Fig. 2f), or for fibrosis (Fig. 2g). These data further suggest that antibodies recognizing oxidized lipids are involved during early processes in the development of NAFLD.

Low IgM titers against the P1 mimotope have a high predictive value for the presence of NAFLD

To determine the power of low plasma IgM titers against the P1 mimotope to predict the presence of fatty liver disease, age, gender, BMI, total IgM levels, and anti-P1 IgM levels were combined in a single logistic regression model. To account for skewness in their distribution, base-2 logarithms of P1-specific IgM levels were used in the model. Thus, adjusted odds ratios (OR) for this variable reflect the change in odds for an increase of one log2 (the equivalent of a doubling of the value) in the measure. Without adjustment for other risk factors, age (OR = 1.206; confidence interval = 1.039–1.4), BMI (OR = 1.353; confidence interval = 1.228–1.491), total IgM (OR = 0.619; confidence interval = 0.431–0.888), and P1-IgM (OR = 0.428; confidence interval = 0.282–0.65) were all significant predictors for the presence of NAFLD, and female gender was not (Additional file 4: Table S4). Importantly, P1-IgM levels (OR = 0.419; confidence interval = 0.216–0.813) were still a significant predictor for the presence of NAFLD after adjustment for age, gender, BMI, and total IgM (Fig. 3a, Additional file 4: Table S5). Moreover, adjusting for waist circumference instead of BMI in our model did not change the significance for anti-P1 IgM levels (OR = 0.432; confidence interval = 0.261–0.813) in predicting the presence of NAFLD (Additional file 4: Table S6 and Additional file 5: Figure S1). In line with our expectations, BMI (OR = 1.343; confidence interval = 1.211–1.49) and waist circumference (OR = 1.666; confidence interval = 1.354–2.049) were still significant predictors for NAFLD after adjustment, whereas other variables lost their significance (Additional file 4: Tables S5 and S6).
Fig. 3

Single logistic regression model, odds ratio determination, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for P1-specific IgM levels in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). a Odds ratios for the predictive power of anti-P1 immunoglobulin (IgM) titers (log2 scale) for fatty liver disease after adjustment for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and total IgM. b ROC curve analysis for the diagnosis of NAFLD with P1-IgM. c IgM titers towards P1 were divided into quartiles (black: controls; red: NAFLD) and d the odds ratios P1-IgM (log2 scale) for NAFLD were computed across these quartiles after adjusting for age, gender, BMI, and total IgM levels. CI confidence interval

A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic value of anti-P1 IgM titers for NAFLD. An area under the curve (AUC) of 0.703 (confidence interval: 0.617–0.790) for the diagnosis of NAFLD using IgM titers towards P1 was found (Fig. 3b). In addition, the measurements of IgM against P1 were divided into quartiles and the OR for NAFLD were computed across these quartiles after adjusting for age, gender, BMI, and total IgM levels (Fig. 3c, Table 3). Our results indicate that participants in quartile 1 (lowest P1-IgM levels) had an odds ratio of 5.8 (p = 0.01, confidence interval: 1.209–27.818), indicating an increased likelihood of NAFLD with decreasing P1-IgM levels, independent of age, gender, BMI, and total IgM levels (Fig. 3d, Table 3). Taken together, these data indicate that P1-specific IgM titers have a high predictive value for the presence of NAFLD, independent of total IgM levels.
Table 3

Odds ratios of P1-specific immunoglobulin M levels for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

 

Odds ratio

95 % confidence interval

Quartile 1

5.8

1.209–27.818

Quartile 2

2.431

0.613–9.647

Quartile 3

1.371

0.357–5.26

Quartile 4

1

 

Adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, and total immunoglobulin M

Anti-P1 IgM titers are not correlated with lipid levels and negatively correlate with markers for liver damage and systemic markers of inflammation

First, the correlation between P1-IgM and plasma lipid levels in all participants was tested. No correlation was found between IgM levels towards P1 and plasma triglycerides (Pearson R: −0.11, Fig. 4a), cholesterol (Pearson R: −0.09, Fig. 4b), or LDL (Pearson R: −0.03, Fig. 4c), well-known indicators for steatosis and risk factors for NAFLD. Next, we assessed the potential correlation with markers for obesity: BMI, waist circumference, and leptin concentration. A strong inverse correlation was observed between P1-IgM and BMI (Pearson R: −0.28, p = 0.0009, Fig. 4d), waist circumference (Pearson R: −0.22, p = 0.02, Fig. 4e), and leptin concentration (Pearson R: −0.32, p = 0.0026, Fig. 4f). These data are in line with a previously reported study showing elevated serum leptin levels during NAFLD [16]. Moreover, obesity, which is a known risk factor for NAFLD, has been associated with increased leptin levels [17]. Additionally, we tested the correlation between P1-IgM and circulatory markers for liver damage, inflammation, and adipokines. Interestingly, a strong inverse correlation was found between P1-IgM levels and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1; Pearson R: −0.39, p = 0.0006, Fig. 4g), IL-6 (Pearson R: −0.24, p = 0.041, Fig. 4h), and cathepsin D (Pearson R −0.25, p = 0.0033, Fig. 4I), which we recently validated as a marker for pediatric NASH. Moreover, anti-P1-IgM titers were inversely correlated with alanine aminotransferase (ALT; Pearson R: −0.17, p = 0.047, Additional file 6: Figure S2A) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST; Pearson R: −0.18, p = 0.037, Additional file 6: Figure S2B) and a trend was observed with gamma-glutamyltransferase (γGT; Pearson R: −0.11, Additional file 6: Figure S2C). These data indicate that increased liver damage, assessed by AST and ALT levels, is associated with reduced levels of IgM antibody titers towards OSE. No correlation was found with IL-1β (Pearson R: 0.16, Additional file 6: Figure S2D) or IL-8 (Pearson R: −0.10, Additional file 6: Figure S2E). Taken together, these data suggest that immune recognition of oxidized lipids is affected during obesity and plays an important role during related diseases, such as the early stages of hepatic inflammation in NAFLD. These results also suggest an indicative role of low P1-IgM levels in regard to systemic markers of inflammation and liver damage.
Fig. 4

Correlation between plasma P1-immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels and plasma lipids and systemic markers of inflammation. Shown are the Pearson R correlation between plasma IgM titers towards P1 and a plasma triglycerides (TG), b cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), d body mass index (BMI), e waist circumference, f leptin, and the markers for inflammation g monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP1), h interleukin 6 (IL-6), and i cathepsin D. RLU relative light unit

Low OSE-specific IgM levels are not associated with hepatitis C or IBD-dependent inflammation

To determine the association between plasma P1-IgM levels and other chronic inflammatory diseases, a separate analysis was conducted on two cohorts consisting of patients with hepatitis C or autoimmune IBD. Total and OSE-specific IgM and IgG antibody titers were assessed in both cohorts. Total IgM titers were unchanged between patients with hepatitis C and controls (167 versus 117 mg/dL, Fig. 5a, Additional file 4: Table S7) whereas total IgG levels were higher in patients with hepatitis C than in controls (1506 versus 1091 mg/dL, Additional file 4: Table S7). Importantly, in contrast to our findings in NAFLD, IgM titers towards P1 were higher in patients with hepatitis C than in controls (99,785 versus 62,828 RLU/100 ms, p < 0.0001, Fig. 5b, Additional file 4: Table S7). Adjusting for total IgM antibody levels resulted in no significant differences between the two groups (686 versus 644 (ratio), Fig. 5c). OSE-specific IgG levels were higher in patients with hepatitis C than in controls (Additional file 4: Table S8). These data further suggest that low levels of IgM antibodies targeting oxidized lipids are specific for obesity-related diseases such as NAFLD.
Fig. 5

Plasma immunoglobulin M (IgM) titers in cohorts consisting of patients with hepatitis C or patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). a Total, b anti-P1 IgM titers, and c P1/total IgM ratio in healthy controls and patients with hepatitis C. Relationship between the activity score during IBD and d total IgM, e P1-specific IgM, and f P1/total IgM ratio. Inactive disease was given score 0, mild to moderate disease activity was given a score of 1–2, and severe activity was given a score of 3. Data are expressed in mg/dl or relative light units (RLU)/100 ms and presented as means and standard deviations. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001

In the IBD cohort (n = 62; mean male age 49.4 years and female age 54.8 years), 46 had Crohn’s disease (8 ileal, 17 colonic, and 21 ileocolonic), 15 ulcerative colitis (1 procolitis, 10 distal, and 4 pancolitis), and one patient had indeterminate colitis. IBD is characterized by fluctuations in the inflammatory state of the gut [18]. The patients were classified during endoscopy according to the activity state of inflammation at the time of blood sampling with a score ranging from 0 to 3, in which 0 means inactive (n = 23), 1–2 refers to mild to moderate activity (n = 10), and 3 indicates severely active disease (n = 29). In contrast to our measurements in patients with NAFLD, total IgM levels were not influenced by the inflammatory activity state in patients with IBD (36,025 versus 37,013 versus 40,280 RLU/100 ms, Fig. 5d). Next, IgM antibody titers towards the P1 mimotope were determined in these patients, reflecting the IgM titers against OSE. In contrast to the decreased levels found in the plasma of patients with NAFLD, slightly higher P1-specific IgM titers were found in the plasma of patients classified with high activity IBD (score 3) compared to patients with inactive disease (score 0) (31,052 versus 21,121 RLU/100 ms, p = 0.0383, Fig. 5e). We could not detect a difference in P1-specific IgM in patients scored as 0 and 1–2 (21,121 versus 23,060 RLU/100 ms, Fig. 5e), nor between patients scored as 1–2 and 3 (23,060 versus 31,052 RLU/100 ms, Fig. 5e), respectively. Additionally, no difference was observed between the groups after normalization for total IgM levels (0.628 versus 0.608 versus 0.755 (ratio), Fig. 5f). These data suggest that decreased IgM antibody titers towards MDA-type epitopes are more specifically associated with lipid-induced inflammation, as present in obesity-related diseases like atherosclerosis and in the spectrum of NAFLD.

Discussion

The multifactorial mechanisms responsible for the worsening of NAFLD are still poorly understood. Although inflammation is believed to set the stage for further progression into fibrosis and cirrhosis, relevant insights into underlying pathways are missing. Hence, therapy options are only partially effective and accurate, non-invasive diagnostic tools to detect early signs of fatty liver disease are lacking. In the present study, we assessed the relationship between antibodies specific for model epitopes of oxidized lipids and human NAFLD. Our data indicate an inverse association between OSE-specific IgM titers and NAFLD, while no association was observed with hepatitis C or IBD.

Elevated IgM antibody levels to epitopes of OxLDL due to immunization strategies have been reported in mouse models of atherosclerosis with distinct athero-protective functions [1922]. It has also been demonstrated that immunization with autologous MDA-LDL reduces atherosclerotic lesion formation in rabbits and mice [23, 24]. MDA epitopes were found to be highly expressed in atherosclerotic lesions [10] and antibodies recognizing immunogenic lipid peroxidation end products have also been intensively studied in patients with cardiovascular disease. IgM titers were found to be inversely associated with CVD events and low levels of OSE-specific IgM were shown to be associated with an increased risk for myocardial infarction [25, 26]. Also, during NASH, lipid peroxidation as a result of steatosis and the consequential formation of OSE such as MDA have been implicated. In addition, IgM antibodies targeting these OSE have been proposed to be protective against hepatic inflammation [8]. In line with our current data, we have previously shown that immunization of hyperlipidemic Ldlr −/− mice leads to reduced hepatic inflammation upon high-cholesterol diet due to increased IgM titers towards PC, another OSE [8]. We have recently shown that deficiency of Siglec-G, a negative regulator of B-cells that results in increased B-1 cells and OSE-specific IgM antibodies, inhibits diet-induced hepatic inflammation and atherosclerosis [9]. Taken together, our current findings further support the idea that IgM targeting OxLDL and/or specific OSE play an important role during chronic fatty liver disease.

Immune reactions triggered by oxidative stress have been shown to be involved during the progression of NAFLD to fibrosis [4]. In line with data from patients with alcoholic liver disease [27], increased IgG levels against antigens derived from lipid peroxidation, such as proteins adducted with MDA, have been found in patients with established fibrosis [4]. An explanation for this association may be the potential dual effect of MDA adducts on hepatic stellate cells. It was shown that MDA is specifically recognized by hepatic stellate cells via an interaction with CD36 scavenger receptors [28], thereby potentially stimulating the production of collagen and fibronectin, and promoting an immune response towards MDA as human hepatic stellate cells can promote lymphocyte proliferation [29]. Another study demonstrated that serum IgA levels are elevated in patients with late-stage NASH in comparison with those with early-stage NASH [30]. More recently, a study by McPherson et al. indicated that serum IgA levels are frequently elevated in patients with NAFLD and could be useful to predict advanced fibrosis [31]. These findings were confirmed in a study by Maleki et al., showing that IgA levels are useful to evaluate the severity of liver fibrosis [32]. In both studies, total IgM levels were determined in addition to IgA levels. In line with our data, no differences were observed in the levels of total IgM antibodies in patients with late-stage NASH compared to patients with early-stage NASH, or between patients with different stages of fibrosis [30, 31]. Nevertheless, because IgM antibody titers targeting OSE were not determined in these studies it is not possible to conclude any association between levels of OSE-specific IgM to NASH development in these cohorts. Additional investigations of IgM antibodies towards different OSE, and in particular the P1 mimotope, in multiple larger cohorts are necessary to confirm the inverse correlation with NAFLD. It will be particularly interesting to follow up anti-OSE-IgM levels in patients with NAFLD and NASH who undergo treatment or lifestyle changes.

Recently, Tsiantoulas et al. showed that MDA epitopes are present on circulating microparticles and are recognized by specific IgM antibodies, thereby potentially dampening their pro-inflammatory effects [33]. Microparticles are part of a group of extracellular vesicles (0.1–1 μm in diameter) produced and released by budding from the plasma membrane upon activation or apoptosis of different cell types, including monocytes [34]. Microparticles have been found to play an important role in NAFLD and related diseases (reviewed in [35]). Patients with NASH were shown to have increased numbers of circulating microparticles from invariant natural killer T cells and macrophages/monocytes (CD14+), dominant cell types in mediating the pathogenesis of NASH [36]. Moreover, the level of microparticles, which was shown to correlate positively with ALT and disease severity, has been proposed as a new biomarker for NASH [36]. Another study has recently demonstrated that lipids induce microparticle release from hepatocytes, which activate macrophages and lead to an inflammatory response in NASH [37]. In line with our described findings, one may hypothesize that increased levels of microparticles due to lipid overload during the onset of NAFLD and NASH result in a consumption of OSE-specific IgM. Further studies are needed to address the role and interplay between microparticles and OSE-specific antibodies in the pathogenesis of fatty liver disease.

The similarities between atherosclerosis and NAFLD, and our observations regarding the correlations with BMI and waist circumference allow us to hypothesize that low IgM titers towards oxidized lipids are a consequence of obesity and are specifically associated with related diseases. In contrast to lipid-induced inflammation during obesity, IBD is believed to result from an inappropriate inflammatory response to intestinal microbes in a genetically susceptible host [18]. Altered serum IgG levels have previously been found in patients with IBD [38, 39]: serum IgG subclass IgG1 and IgG3 levels were elevated in ulcerative colitis, and IgG2 and IgG4 levels were increased in patients with Crohn’s disease. In line with our findings, no significant differences were found in total IgM concentration, whereas anti-OSE-IgM titers were not determined [38]. Further, different serum immunoglobulins were recently reported in patients with IBD in a cross-sectional study [40]. Similar to our observation, no correlation was found between disease activity during IBD and IgM levels [40].

Importantly, increased serum levels of MDA and lipid oxidation were found to be present in individuals with chronic hepatitis C [41], which might be reflected in a different host immune response towards epitopes of lipid oxidation, thereby limiting the specificity for our findings towards NAFLD. In line with previous reported findings, total and OSE-specific IgG antibodies were increased in patients with hepatitis C compared to healthy controls [4245], indicative of an increased immune response towards oxidative lipids in hepatitis C. Moreover, in contrast to our findings in NAFLD, IgM titers towards P1 are increased in patients with hepatitis C compared to controls. However, adjusting for total IgM antibody levels indicates no differences between the two groups. Besides our findings in patients with IBD, these data indicate that reduced levels of IgM antibodies targeting oxidation products of lipids are not specific to fatty liver disease but rather associated with obesity-related diseases such as atherosclerosis and NAFLD/NASH. Nevertheless, additional validation in other cohorts with different chronic liver diseases is needed to support the specificity of low OSE-specific IgM titers in NAFLD.

So far, the reason behind the lower OSE-specific IgM levels in comparison to healthy participants is not clear. Similar to the view in CVD [26], one possible explanation is that, during NAFLD, there is increased consumption of IgM antibodies due to increased levels of OSE and ultimately increased clearance and/or uptake in the vessel wall. Alternatively, it is possible that genetic variation leading to lower basal IgM levels are the underlying cause for patients being at higher risk for developing lipid-induced related diseases such as atherosclerosis and NAFLD/NASH. In the latter case, low OSE-specific IgM levels should be considered a risk factor for developing fatty liver disease. Further research is needed to understand why basal differences in OSE-specific IgM levels exist and whether this can be seen as a risk factor for NAFLD.

Conclusions

In the current manuscript we point out that IgM titers to epitopes on oxidized lipids are negatively associated with NAFLD using the P1 mimotope, which serves as a highly reproducible antigen to assess antibody titers in patients. While the link between anti-P1 IgM measurements and NAFLD, which is independent of classical risk factors for NAFLD, provides critical insights into the pathophysiology of chronic fatty liver disease, plasma levels of anti-P1 IgM are not suitable as a biomarker for the progression of NAFLD. This conclusion is based on the inability of anti-P1 IgM titers to distinguish steatosis from NASH, the correlation between P1 IgM titers to BMI, and the large overlap between NAFLD and control participants for the different measurements. Of note, our findings suggest that obesity/hyperlipidemia is a causal factor for reduced IgM levels, rendering people more prone to develop fatty liver disease and related disorders such as atherosclerosis. Additional studies assessing IgM antibodies towards different OSE, and in particular the P1 mimotope, in multiple larger cohorts are necessary to confirm the inverse correlation with NAFLD and to address the potential causal link with obesity.

Abbreviations

ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; AP, alkaline phosphatase; AUC, area under curve; BMI, body mass index; BSA, bovine serum albumin; CuOx-LDL, Copper oxidized low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; Ig, immunoglobulin; IL-1β, interleukin 1 beta; IL-6, interleukin 6; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MAA, malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1; MDA, malondialdehyde; NALFD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NAS, NAFLD activity score; NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; OR, odds ratio; OSE, oxidation-specific epitope; OxLDL, oxidized low-density lipoprotein; PC, phosphocholine; RLU, relative light units; ROC, receiver operating characteristic (curve); TBS, Tris-buffered saline; γGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase.

Declarations

Funding

This research was supported by Cardiovascular Research the Netherlands (CVON 2012-03, IN-CONTROL), the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) (Vidi 016.126.327), and by the SFB Lipotox F30 of the Austrian Science Fund. TH was supported by a Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds travel grant.

Authors’ contributions

TH: study concept and design; acquisition of data; analysis and interpretation of data; drafting of the manuscript; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; statistical analysis; obtained funding. MW: critical revision of the manuscript; analysis and interpretation of data; statistical analysis. CJB, RS: study concept and design; analysis and interpretation of data; drafting of the manuscript; critical revision of the manuscript; obtained funding; administrative, technical, or material support; study supervision. SW, SA, SG, MOK, SK, HG, GK, MP, DJ, KS, MT, MH: critical revision of the manuscript; technical or material support. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departments of Molecular Genetics, Pathology, and Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM) and School of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University and Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC)
(2)
Departments of Laboratory Medicine, Surgery, and Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology And Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna
(3)
Center for Molecular Medicine (CeMM) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences
(4)
Department of Pathobiology, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
(5)
Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen

References

  1. Byrne CD, Targher G. NAFLD: A multisystem disease. J Hepatol. 2015;62(1S):S47–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Michelotti GA, Machado MV, Diehl AM. NAFLD, NASH and liver cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10(11):656–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ratziu V, Goodman Z, Sanyal A. Current efforts and trends in the treatment of NASH. J Hepatol. 2015;62(1S):S65–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Albano E, Mottaran E, Vidali M, Reale E, Saksena S, Occhino G, et al. Immune response towards lipid peroxidation products as a predictor of progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease to advanced fibrosis. Gut. 2005;54(7):987–93.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Walenbergh SM, Koek GH, Bieghs V, Shiri-Sverdlov R. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: the role of oxidized low-density lipoproteins. J Hepatol. 2013;58(4):801–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chou MY, Fogelstrand L, Hartvigsen K, Hansen LF, Woelkers D, Shaw PX, et al. Oxidation-specific epitopes are dominant targets of innate natural antibodies in mice and humans. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(5):1335–49.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Binder CJ. Natural IgM antibodies against oxidation-specific epitopes. J Clin Immunol. 2010;30 Suppl 1:S56–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bieghs V, van Gorp PJ, Walenbergh SM, Gijbels MJ, Verheyen F, Buurman WA, et al. Specific immunization strategies against oxidized low-density lipoprotein: a novel way to reduce nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in mice. Hepatology. 2012;56(3):894–903.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Gruber S, Hendrikx T, Tsiantoulas D, Ozsvar-Kozma M, Goderle L, Mallat Z, Witztum JL, Shiri-Sverdlov R, Nitschke L, Binder CJ. Sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin G promotes atherosclerosis and liver inflammation by suppressing the protective functions of B-1 cells. Cell Rep. 2016;14(10):2348–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Amir S, Hartvigsen K, Gonen A, Leibundgut G, Que X, Jensen-Jarolim E, et al. Peptide mimotopes of malondialdehyde epitopes for clinical applications in cardiovascular disease. J Lipid Res. 2012;53(7):1316–26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Kalhan SC, Guo L, Edmison J, Dasarathy S, McCullough AJ, Hanson RW, et al. Plasma metabolomic profile in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Metabolism. 2011;60(3):404–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kasumov T, Edmison JM, Dasarathy S, Bennett C, Lopez R, Kalhan SC. Plasma levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine in patients with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Metabolism. 2011;60(6):776–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, Behling C, Contos MJ, Cummings OW, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41(6):1313–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bodelier AG, Pierik MJ, van den Heuvel T, Bovee-Oudenhoven IM, de Boer E, Hameeteman W, et al. Pancreatitis-associated protein has no additional value as a marker of disease activity in a real-life cohort of IBD patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;26(8):902–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Satsangi J, Silverberg MS, Vermeire S, Colombel JF. The Montreal classification of inflammatory bowel disease: controversies, consensus, and implications. Gut. 2006;55(6):749–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Chitturi S, Farrell G, Frost L, Kriketos A, Lin R, Fung C, et al. Serum leptin in NASH correlates with hepatic steatosis but not fibrosis: a manifestation of lipotoxicity? Hepatology. 2002;36(2):403–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Considine RV, Sinha MK, Heiman ML, Kriauciunas A, Stephens TW, Nyce MR, et al. Serum immunoreactive-leptin concentrations in normal-weight and obese humans. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(5):292–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Abraham C, Cho JH. Inflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(21):2066–78.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Binder CJ, Horkko S, Dewan A, Chang MK, Kieu EP, Goodyear CS, et al. Pneumococcal vaccination decreases atherosclerotic lesion formation: molecular mimicry between Streptococcus pneumoniae and oxidized LDL. Nat Med. 2003;9(6):736–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cesena FH, Dimayuga PC, Yano J, Zhao X, Kirzner J, Zhou J, et al. Immune-modulation by polyclonal IgM treatment reduces atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic apoE-/- mice. Atherosclerosis. 2012;220(1):59–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kyaw T, Tay C, Krishnamurthi S, Kanellakis P, Agrotis A, Tipping P, et al. B1a B lymphocytes are atheroprotective by secreting natural IgM that increases IgM deposits and reduces necrotic cores in atherosclerotic lesions. Circ Res. 2011;109(8):830–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lewis MJ, Malik TH, Ehrenstein MR, Boyle JJ, Botto M, Haskard DO. Immunoglobulin M is required for protection against atherosclerosis in low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice. Circulation. 2009;120(5):417–26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Freigang S, Horkko S, Miller E, Witztum JL, Palinski W. Immunization of LDL receptor-deficient mice with homologous malondialdehyde-modified and native LDL reduces progression of atherosclerosis by mechanisms other than induction of high titers of antibodies to oxidative neoepitopes. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18(12):1972–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Palinski W, Miller E, Witztum JL. Immunization of low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-deficient rabbits with homologous malondialdehyde-modified LDL reduces atherogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(3):821–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Ravandi A, Boekholdt SM, Mallat Z, Talmud PJ, Kastelein JJ, Wareham NJ, et al. Relationship of IgG and IgM autoantibodies and immune complexes to oxidized LDL with markers of oxidation and inflammation and cardiovascular events: results from the EPIC-Norfolk Study. J Lipid Res. 2011;52(10):1829–36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Tsimikas S, Brilakis ES, Lennon RJ, Miller ER, Witztum JL, McConnell JP, et al. Relationship of IgG and IgM autoantibodies to oxidized low density lipoprotein with coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events. J Lipid Res. 2007;48(2):425–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rolla R, Vay D, Mottaran E, Parodi M, Vidali M, Sartori M, et al. Antiphospholipid antibodies associated with alcoholic liver disease specifically recognise oxidised phospholipids. Gut. 2001;49(6):852–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Schneiderhan W, Schmid-Kotsas A, Zhao J, Grunert A, Nussler A, Weidenbach H, et al. Oxidized low-density lipoproteins bind to the scavenger receptor, CD36, of hepatic stellate cells and stimulate extracellular matrix synthesis. Hepatology. 2001;34(4 Pt 1):729–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Vinas O, Bataller R, Sancho-Bru P, Gines P, Berenguer C, Enrich C, et al. Human hepatic stellate cells show features of antigen-presenting cells and stimulate lymphocyte proliferation. Hepatology. 2003;38(4):919–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Tomita K, Teratani T, Yokoyama H, Suzuki T, Irie R, Ebinuma H, et al. Serum immunoglobulin a concentration is an independent predictor of liver fibrosis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis before the cirrhotic stage. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56(12):3648–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. McPherson S, Henderson E, Burt AD, Day CP, Anstee QM. Serum immunoglobulin levels predict fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2014;60(5):1055–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Maleki I, Aminafshari MR, Taghvaei T, Hosseini V, Rafiei A, Torabizadeh Z, et al. Serum immunoglobulin A concentration is a reliable biomarker for liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(35):12566–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsiantoulas D, Perkmann T, Afonyushkin T, Mangold A, Prohaska TA, Papac-Milicevic N, et al. Circulating microparticles carry oxidation-specific epitopes and are recognized by natural IgM antibodies. J Lipid Res. 2015;56(2):440–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Kornek M, Schuppan D. Microparticles: Modulators and biomarkers of liver disease. J Hepatol. 2012;57(5):1144–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hirsova P, Ibrahim SH, Gores GJ, Malhi H. Lipotoxic lethal and sublethal stress signaling in hepatocytes: relevance to NASH pathogenesis. J Lipid Res. 2016. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  36. Kornek M, Lynch M, Mehta SH, Lai M, Exley M, Afdhal NH, et al. Circulating microparticles as disease-specific biomarkers of severity of inflammation in patients with hepatitis C or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(2):448–58.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Hirsova P, Ibrahim SH, Krishnan A, Verma VK, Bronk SF, Werneburg NW, Charlton MR, Shah VH, Malhi H, Gores GJ. Lipid-induced signaling causes release of inflammatory extracellular vesicles from hepatocytes. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(4):956–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Gouni-Berthold I, Baumeister B, Berthold HK, Schmidt C. Immunoglobulins and IgG subclasses in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999;46(27):1720–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. MacDermott RP, Nash GS, Auer IO, Shlien R, Lewis BS, Madassery J, et al. Alterations in serum immunoglobulin G subclasses in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 1989;96(3):764–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Rai T, Wu X, Shen B. Frequency and risk factors of low immunoglobulin levels in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2015;3(2):115–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. De Maria N, Colantoni A, Fagiuoli S, Liu GJ, Rogers BK, Farinati F, et al. Association between reactive oxygen species and disease activity in chronic hepatitis C. Free Radic Biol Med. 1996;21(3):291–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Vidali M, Occhino G, Ivaldi A, Rigamonti C, Sartori M, Albano E. Combination of oxidative stress and steatosis is a risk factor for fibrosis in alcohol-drinking patients with chronic hepatitis C. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(1):147–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ortarik Z, Toyran A, Sen S, Mart Komurcu SZ, Guvener E. [Evaluation of serum IgG, IgA and IgM levels as indicators of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection]. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2011;45(2):296–305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Gonzalez-Quintela A, Alende MR, Gamallo R, Gonzalez-Gil P, Lopez-Ben S, Tome S, et al. Serum immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, IgM) in chronic hepatitis C. A comparison with non-cirrhotic alcoholic liver disease. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;50(54):2121–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Watt K, Uhanova J, Gong Y, Kaita K, Doucette K, Pettigrew N, et al. Serum immunoglobulins predict the extent of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J Viral Hepat. 2004;11(3):251–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement