Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Is Graves’ disease a primary immunodeficiency? New immunological perspectives on an endocrine disease

Contributed equally
BMC Medicine201715:174

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0939-9

Received: 9 June 2017

Accepted: 4 September 2017

Published: 25 September 2017

Abstract

Background

Uncertainty about factors influencing the susceptibility and triggers for Graves’ disease persists, along with a wide variation in the response to anti-thyroid drugs, currently at approximately 50% of non-responders. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize immunological concepts, with a combined endocrine and immunological perspective, to highlight potential new areas of research.

Main text

Relevant studies were identified through a systematic literature search using the PubMed and EMBASE databases in March 2016. No cut-offs regarding dates were imposed. We used the terms “Graves’ Disease” or “Basedow” or “thyrotoxicosis” together with the terms “etiology”, “pathophysiology”, “immunodeficiency”, “causality”, and “autoimmunity”. The terms “orbitopathy”, “ophthalmopathy”, and “amiodarone” were excluded. Articles in English, French, German, Croatian, Spanish, and Italian were eligible for inclusion.

Conclusions

While concepts such as the impact of iodine, smoking, human leucocyte antigen, infections, and ethnicity are established, new ideas have emerged. Pertaining evidence suggests the involvement of autoimmunity and immunodeficiency in the pathophysiology of Graves’ disease. Recent studies point to specific immunological mechanisms triggering the onset of disease, which may also serve as targets for more specific therapies.

Keywords

Graves’ diseaseReviewEtiologyPathophysiologyPrimary immunodeficiency

Background

Primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs) are genetically determined diseases impacting the normal function of the immune system due to mutations in immune system genes. More than 250 PID entities have been defined to date, with the number rapidly evolving. Many patients with a PID show their first clinical manifestation in adulthood and, in some patients, the PID is never diagnosed since it is not searched for. PIDs may clinically manifest in both childhood or adulthood and patients may present with a susceptibility to infection. However, a significant number of PID patients present with autoimmune disease (AID) alone. The association of PIDs with AIDs is mechanistically complex and multifactorial (Table 1) [1]. The clinical penetrance of PID-associated gene mutations is far below 100% and novel mutations may occur during spermatogenesis or during oogenesis, implying that lack of a familial history does not argue against PIDs in a patient with autoimmunity.
Table 1

Interplay of autoimmunity and immunodeficiency regarding Graves’ disease

Primary immunodeficiency

Phenotype

Involved cell types

Protein/Synapse

Gene

Mechanism

Association with Graves’ disease

Reference

Selective IgA deficiency

Celiac disease, type 1 diabetes mellitus, impaired mucosal defense, most common PID

B cells

Granulocytes

Ligation with its receptor (FcαRI) leads to ADCC, granulocyte degranulation, phagocytosis and neutrophil oxidative burst

Most commonly HLA haplotype 8.1

Ligation with its receptor (FcαRI) leads to ADCC, granulocyte degranulation, phagocytosis and neutrophil oxidative burst

++

[95, 96]

Severe combined immunodeficiency

Recurrent infections, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis, ITP, AH, AITD

T cells

Low expression of T cell receptor

CD3γ gene

Impaired negative selection in thymus

+

[59]

Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome

Autoimmunity and polyclonal lymphocyte accumulation with lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly

T cells

Intra-thymic apoptosis via FASL to its receptor FAS (CD95) and subsequent activation of caspases 8 and 3 with impaired T cell apoptosis

Heterogeneous mutations of FAS signaling pathway

(1) Molecular mimicry or

(2) Slowing down of apoptosis and/or exposure of apoptosis related autoantigens

+

[6264]

IPEX syndrome

Immune dysregulation (eczema), polyendocrinopathy (T1DM), enteropathy

Treg cells Thymus

Loss of essential transcription factor

FOXP3 on X chromosome

Greatly reduced Treg cell number

++

[65]

IPEX-like

IPEX-like phenotype

Treg cells

IL-2-receptor-α chain (CD25)

CD25 deficiency due to autosomal recessive mutations

Normal Treg in numbers but deficient stimulation by defective IL-10 expression

+/–

[6770]

Common variable immunodeficiency

Various autoimmune diseases (ITP, AIHA, psoriasis, AITD, arthritis) and antibody deficiencies,organ infiltration (bone marrow, kidney, brain, liver, spleen) by granulomatous-lymphocytic infiltration

APCs

Treg cells

B cells

Naïve T cells

CTLA-4 binds to CD80/CD86 (B7) on APCs, leading to lower levels of co-stimulatory B7, failure to activate CD28 (the ligand for B7) on T cells

CTLA-4 germline mutations with incomplete penetrance

Treg cells increased, but dysfunctional (decreased CTLA-4 ligand binding)

+

[71, 75]

Systemic lupus erythematosus -like

Recurrent infections; cutaneous, discoid lupus most common presentation, malar rash, oral ulcers, recurrent fever and vasculitis

Macrophages

Apoptotic B cells

MFG-E8 (mice) and complement factor C1q

Homozygous nonsense and missense mutations on chromosome 1p (C1q)

Impaired debris removal,

autoantibodies against C1q correlates with thyroid function in AITD

+

[7679]

Common variable immunodeficiency

See above

APCs

Treg cells

B cells

naïve T cells

BAFF

BAFF-R P21R variant

BAFF (SNPs rs1041569 & rs2893321)P21R (TNF-RSF13C allele)

Higher levels stimulate B cell survival, increase of TR antibody levels

++

[102104, 106, 107]

Hyper-IgM syndrome

Elevated serum IgM, but deficiency in IgG/A/E, recurrent respiratory and gastrointestinal infections with pyogenic bacteria and opportunistic organisms (e.g., P. jirovecii)

APCs

T cells

B cells

Thyrocytes

CD40

Autosomal recessive CD40 gene mutations

Upregulation of CD40 on thyrocytes, increased co-stimulatory effects and immunoglobulin class switching

+

[5, 14, 54, 108]

Common variable immunodeficiency

See above

APCs

Treg cells

B cells

Naïve T cells

Miscellaneous

Decreased methylation of various genes

Higher ICAM-1, decreased B cell class switching

+/–

[109, 120, 121]

Skewed X-chromosome inactivation

Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome: PID with eczema, thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea

Thymus

T cells

B cells

Miscellaneous

Genes for Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein, CD40L or the IL-2 receptor-\( \gamma \) chain

Reduced thymic expression of X chromosome-dependent self-antigens primes inadequate T cell apoptosis

++

[118, 119]

Trisomy 21

Down syndrome: increased susceptibility to leukemia, but reduced incidence of solid tumors

Thymus T cells

IFN-γ

AIRE and FOXP3 on X chromosome

Increased production of IFN-γ with augmented Th1 responses

Reduced activity of Treg cells

++

[51, 53, 66]

ADCC antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity, AIHA autoimmune hemolytic anemia, AITD autoimmune thyroid disease, AH autoimmune hepatitis, APC antigen presenting cell, BAFF B-lymphocyte activating factor, CD cluster of differentiation, CTLA cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein, FasL type-II transmembrane protein of TNF family, FOXP3 forkhead box P3, HLA human leukocyte antigen, IL interleukin, IFN interferon, IPEX immunodysregulation polyendocrinopathy enteropathy X-linked, ITP immune thrombocytopenic purpura, MFG-E8 Milk fat globule epidermal growth factor 8, PID primary immunodeficiency, T1DM type 1 diabetes mellitus, TR thyrotropin related

Main text

Literature search and inclusion criteria

Relevant studies were identified through a systematic literature search using the PubMed and EMBASE databases in March 2016. No cut-offs regarding dates were imposed. We used the terms “Graves’ Disease” or “Basedow” or “thyrotoxicosis” together with the terms “etiology”, “pathophysiology”, “immunodeficiency”, “causality”, and “autoimmunity”. The terms “orbitopathy”, “ophthalmopathy”, and “amiodarone” were excluded. Articles in English, French, German, Croatian, Spanish, and Italian were eligible for inclusion.

Immunologic view on exogenous factors associated with Graves’ disease (GD)

In iodine-sufficient areas, GD is the most common cause of primary hyperthyroidism in the younger population [2]. It is an autoimmune disorder characterized by the presence of thyrotropin-related antibodies (TRAb) that stimulate thyroidal cells, resulting in an overproduction of thyroid hormones [3].

The global prevalence of GD has been reported to range from 0.5% to 2% of the population, with an incidence of 1 in 4000 persons per year [4, 5]. Similar to other AIDs, GD is predominantly found in females – with a female-to-male ratio of four to six – and occurs predominantly in the third and fourth decade of life [5]. Age is an important factor determining the response to treatment, as indicated by a recent report showing that the overall remission rate after anti-thyroid drug (ATD) treatment in a cohort of 268 children was 15% [6], markedly lower than the 40–60% usually seen in adults [4]. As GD tends to relapse more often in the young, it can be speculated that these individuals harbor a strong genetic susceptibility. This notion is supported by the finding that monozygotic twins share concordance for GD in roughly 75% of cases [710]. Geographic variations in the incidence of GD may be due to genetic variations and/or exposure to local factors, but immigrants from lower risk regions acquire a similar risk over time as people in the new area of residence [11]. Analyses of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data from the United States have also demonstrated racial variations in prevalence; indeed, African Americans were more likely to develop thyrotoxicosis (odds ratio (OR) 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.5–5.7) compared to Caucasians, whereas there was no difference in prevalence between Hispanics and Caucasians [12].

The overall effect size for genetic markers in most studies is rather weak, with OR ranging from 2 to 4 for genes in the human leucocyte antigen (HLA) complex and from 1.1 to 2.6 for other genes [1315], thus providing evidence of the involvement of other factors [14]. Various factors have been suggested to be causative (Figs. 1 and 2) of GD, and will be discussed in more detail in this review. The great disadvantage in all these genome-wide association studies (GWAS) is the fact that GD is likely a heterogeneous disease and might represent a common final path of various and different gene mutations. Therefore, the pooling of patients with various genetic etiologies of GD will dilute the impact of specific gene mutations.
Fig. 1

Interplay of factors influencing the pathophysiology of Graves’ disease. Ab antibodies, APC antigen presenting cell, BAFF B-lymphocyte activating factor, CD cluster of differentiation, CTLA cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein, CXCL C-X-C motif chemokine, FCRL Fc receptor-like protein 3, FOXP3 forkhead box P3, HCV hepatitis C virus, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, HLA human leukocyte antigen, IL interleukin, IFN interferon, OPN osteopontin, PTPN protein tyrosine phosphatase, TG thyroglobulin, TPO thyroperoxidase, TRAb thyrotropin related antibodies, TSH-R thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor

Fig. 2

Interplay of etiological factors associated with Graves’ disease at the molecular level. Green arrows, stimulatory effects; red arrows, inhibitory effects; purple, thyrocytes; yellow, membrane receptors; blue, T cells; light brown, B cells; dark brown, miscellaneous. Ab antibodies, APC antigen presenting cell, ATD anti-thyroid drug, BAFF B-lymphocyte activating factor, CD cluster of differentiation, CTLA cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein, CXCL C-X-C motif chemokine, FasL type-II transmembrane protein of TNF family, fT4 free thyroxine, HLA human leukocyte antigen, ICAM-1 and B7 adhesion molecules, IL interleukin, IFN interferon, NF-κB nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells, OPN osteopontin, TNF tumor necrosis factor, TRAb thyrotropin related antibodies, TSH-R thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor

Environmental and dietary factors

Many environmental influences that may alter the immune system and have an impact on the pathogenesis of GD have so far been identified (Fig. 1).

An increased incidence of GD in the postpartum period has long been known [16, 17]. During pregnancy, increased immune-regulation occurs to avoid immune attack towards the haplo-identical fetal tissue through a shift from a type 1 helper T cell response (Th1, responsible for immune rejection of non-matched organ transplants) to a type 2 helper T cell (Th2) response that favors antibody production. Thus, theoretically, this could favor autoantibody and therefore TRAb production [17]. Further, there is increased activity of regulatory T cells (Treg) during pregnancy, impairing auto-immune responses via several different pathways [18, 19]. This immuno-suppressive milieu is abrogated after birth, which might explain the onset of autoimmunity in the postpartum period.

Alemtuzumab, a humanized anti-CD52 antibody originally designed for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, is associated with a higher risk for onset of GD [20]. Alemtuzumab depletes both T and B lymphocytes and thus creates a drastic immunodeficient state. This clinical association demonstrates, as a proof of concept, that immunodeficiency and autoimmunity are two sides of the same coin. Alemtuzumab-induced B cell depletion leads to a reactive increase in the B-lymphocyte activating factor (BAFF) in serum. BAFF promotes survival of B cells in general but of autoimmune B cells in particular and thus favors autoantibody production [2123]. In addition, the BAFF-driven B cell reconstitution following alemtuzumab treatment leads to a transient phase where most of the peripheral blood B cells have an immature, transitional B cell phenotype. Transitional B cells carry B cell receptors with a higher reactivity against self-antigens compared to mature, naïve B cells [24].

An association of GD with smoking has been found in several studies, with a meta-analysis reporting an OR of 3.30 (95% confidence interval 2.09–5.22) [25] and being more pronounced in women [26]. Smoke may damage cells directly, leading to increased accessibility of thyroid gland-derived auto-antigens and may also alter levels of numerous cytokines and soluble cytokine receptors [11]. Another possibility might be the induction of epigenetic changes through smoking [27]. Nicotine, per se, has immunologic functions through the binding to cholinergic receptors on monocytes. Nicotine downregulates the release of innate immune system stimulating high-mobility group box 1 protein by monocytes [28].

Selenium supplementation has been shown to have beneficial effects on mild Graves’ orbitopathy [29]. Yet, whether there are also protective effects on GD relapse rates remains unclear, but an ongoing randomized controlled trial might shed more light on this topic [30]. Selenium deficiency is thought to favor autoimmunity by tipping the Th cell balance towards a Th1 predominance, increased pro-inflammatory cytokines, and reducing the number of Treg cells [31].

Exposure to radiation, such as neck irradiation or nuclear fallout, can prime AIDs through destruction of thyrocytes with consequent release of otherwise immunologically ignored antigens [32]. Radiation of the thymus may also impair thymus function and thus the generation of Treg cells. In a mouse model, the latter mechanism seemed to be triggering radiation-induced autoimmunity rather than radiation-induced release of organ-derived antigens [33]. Nevertheless, results are contradictory as some studies report an increased incidence of GD following irradiation whereas others do not [3436].

Infections

GD has been reported to occur at a higher frequency after a mean of 17 months following initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in HIV patients [37]. This coincides with HAART-induced immune reconstitution, as a sequela of massive production of naïve T cells from the thymus. IL-7 may be the T-cell counterpart of the aforementioned BAFF, as it is highly increased in states of T cell lymphopenia [38] and is involved in survival/proliferation of autoreactive T cells [39]. Recently, a therapeutic trial of three doses of recombinant IL-7 applied to increase peripheral T cell numbers in patients with T cell lymphopenia led to induction of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in one out of nine patients [40]. At the same time, immune reconstitution is associated with a lower number of Treg cells, which may further increase the risk of autoimmunity [41].

In the late 1970s, an increased rate of infection with Yersinia enterocolitica in patients with GD was discovered [4244], but the cross-reacting proteins had not been identified until recently [45]. In 2013, Hargreaves et al. [45] showed that TRAb acquire activity only after early precursor B cells undergo somatic hyper-mutation and the mutated antibodies begin to recognize the outer membrane porins A, C, and F of Y. enterocolitica. The authors speculate that memory B cells acquire cross-reactivity with the ability to recognize both the initial pathogen and the thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor (TSH-R).

Besides its association with cryoglobulinemic vasculitis and Sjögren’s syndrome, infection with hepatitis C (HepC) virus predisposes to GD [46]. Interestingly, autoimmune thyroid diseases, and GD in particular, are more frequent in patients with HepC as compared to HepB patients following treatment with interferon (IFN) [47]. One reason for this might be that the HepC virus and thyroid proteins share homologies [48]. The link of type I IFNs to AID is most strikingly demonstrated in a subgroup of monogenic PIDs that share an overexpression of IFN-regulated genes, the so-called interferonopathies [49]. Many of those clinically share chilblain lupus-like skin lesions and calcifications in the central nervous system. A recent analysis of autoimmunity in these patients also described autoimmune thyroiditis in a boy with a genetically proven monogenic interferonopathy [50].

In this respect, it is very interesting that patients with trisomy 21 have a higher incidence of GD [51, 52] and show many features of an interferonopathy. This may be partly linked to the fact that the IFN type I receptor is located on chromosome 21. This increased gene load of IFN-Rs may lead to a constant activation of the IFN pathway [53].

Immunologic view on genetic factors associated with GD

Association with HLA

HLAs on chromosome 6, which are highly polymorphic between individuals, have a pivotal role within the immune system. HLA-A to -C (MHC class I) molecules present antigens to CD8+ T cells and are expressed on almost all tissues. HLA-D (MHC class II) molecules present their antigens to CD4+ T cells and are primarily expressed on antigen presenting cells (APCs) such as dendritic cells or B cells [54]. As already stated, they confer the highest susceptibility for GD of all identified genes based on GWAS analyses [14]. Their sequence diversity largely results from mutations altering the antigen-presenting pocket of the MHC protein. Thus, one hypothesis holds that genetic alterations in regions coding for the structure of the pocket lead to the MHC-presentation of autoantigens to CD4+ T cells. Moreover, interactions between HLA receptors and autoantigens may further multiply the possibilities. This is supported by the fact that the thyroglobulin (TG) gene itself contains GD-susceptible polymorphisms [55, 56]; only certain TG peptides can bind strongly to a corresponding disease-susceptible HLA-DR3 pocket, whereas others do not. Moreover, this results in reduced thymic-negative selection of autoreactive T cells [57, 58].

Mutations associated with impaired central T cell tolerance

T cells whose T cell receptor (TCR) recognizes autoantigens are deleted by apoptosis in the thymus in a process called negative selection. This process requires correct expression of the TCR and normal T cell signaling. CD3 is expressed on all T lymphocytes and critically regulates TCR signaling, thereby regulating the response to antigen encounters as well as positive and negative selection in the thymus. Mutations in the CD3γ gene on peripheral T cells lead to low expression of TCR and thus to impaired negative selection of autoimmune T cells in the thymus. Nine patients with familial autoimmune thyroiditis with deficiencies in CD3γ have been identified to date [59]. These patients also have susceptibility to infections due to diminished T cell stimulation by antigens [59]. The protein tyrosine phosphatase-22 gene (PTPN22) encodes lymphoid tyrosine phosphatase, which suppresses TCR signaling on central and peripheral T cells in vitro via the C-src tyrosine kinase and halts IL-2 production in mice [54]. Consequently, expansion of T cells is inhibited. Loss-of-function mutations in PTPN22 increases GD susceptibility, with an OR of 1.5 to 1.9 [54]. However, the exact mechanism by which this occurs has not been identified to date, and associations between these loss-of-function mutations in PTPN22 and the incidence of GD vary considerably between ethnicities [54, 60].

The autoimmune regulator (AIRE) is a transcription factor that ensures thymic expression of normally extrathymic antigens such as insulin. Human AIRE deficiency leads to organ-specific autoimmunity, and is believed to be a consequence of dysfunctional central immunologic tolerance. AIRE deficiency is often associated with autoimmune adrenalitis; however, GD is not associated with AIRE polymorphisms [61].

Thymic negative selection occurs by activation-induced apoptosis of T cells that recognize autoantigens with their TCR. This process is executed by the binding of FASL to its receptor FAS (CD95) and subsequent activation of caspase 8 and 3, which then leads to T cell apoptosis. Mutations in FAS and FASL lead to autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome, a primary immunodeficiency associated with autoimmune cytopenia but also additional autoimmune features. Interestingly, it has been shown that 24/28 patients with GD have impaired in vitro T cell apoptosis following FAS ligation [62].

In GD, it has been shown that intra-thyroid T cells release apoptosis-inhibiting factors such as caspase 8 inhibitor protein and antiapoptotic BCL-proteins [63]. This might explain why thyrocytes from GD patients survive the autoimmune T cell response, whereas those from patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT) do not [64].

Mutations associated with impaired peripheral T cell tolerance

Autoreactive T cells can be found in the peripheral blood of healthy persons and are kept in check by Treg cells that inhibit, through various mechanisms, autoreactive T cell activation. These Treg cells express the transcription factor forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), which is essential for the generation and maintenance of Treg cells.

Mutations in FOXP3 (located on the X chromosome) lead to immunodysregulation polyendocrinopathy enteropathy X-linked (IPEX) syndrome, a systemic AID immunologically characterized by the loss of Treg cells and clinically manifesting as eczema, enteropathy, and autoimmune endocrinopathy, which may include both hypo- and hyperthyroidism [65].

As outlined earlier, patients with trisomy 21 do not only have an increased incidence of GD, but also an earlier disease onset and more associated AIDs as compared to the general population [52]. However, this cannot be solely attributed to the constitutional activation of the IFN pathway – although these patients exhibit an increased number of Treg cells with normal proliferative capabilities in peripheral blood, their cells have a markedly reduced inhibitory activity [66].

Human Treg cells are the only T cells that express high levels of the IL-2 receptor α chain (CD25) in the naïve (non-activated) state; IL-2 is essential in maintaining the normal life cycle of Treg cells. Human CD25 deficiency causes an IPEX-like phenotype [67]. Further, Treg cells have been shown to be lower in numbers and to be dysfunctional in patients with GD [68]. A polymorphism in the CD25 gene was found to be associated with GD in untreated Russian patients [69], whereas these results could not be replicated in Han Chinese [70].

Treg cells acquire regulatory/suppressive function through the high expression of CTLA-4. CTLA-4 binds to CD80/CD86 (B7) on APCs and may trans-endocytose it [71]. Therefore, APCs express lower levels of the co-stimulatory B7 proteins and fail to activate CD28 (the ligand for B7) on T cells. Thus, the lower the expression of CTLA-4 on Treg cells, the lower the number of activated naïve T cells. This principle has already been introduced into clinical practice in the form of ipilimumab, a CTLA-4 blocking monoclonal antibody that boosts the activation of melanoma-specific T cells [72]. However, therapeutic use of ipilimumab has been shown to induce autoimmune hyperthyroidism [73]. The programmed cell death protein 1 has similar functions as CTLA-4 and its blockade also causes GD [74]. CTLA-4 expression may be lowered due to heterozygous germline mutations (CTLA-4 haploinsufficiency). Thus, these patients do not only develop various autoimmune and lymphoproliferative diseases, but often have antibody deficiency. Therefore, although the numbers of peripheral Treg cells may even be increased in these patients, they are dysfunctional since they display decreased CTLA-4 ligand binding and impaired trans-endocytosis of CD80 and CD86 from APCs [75].

Mutations in the cell debris removal machinery

It is vital that debris from apoptosis, necrosis, and circulating immune complexes are properly disposed of throughout life. This system is maintained by proteins such as MFG-E8 and complement factor C1q [76].

A deficiency in the removal machinery of apoptotic cells leads to systemic lupus-like autoimmunity. This is exemplarily shown in lupus-like disease in humans with C1q deficiency [77] and in mice deficient for MFG-E8 [78]. Interestingly, autoantibodies against C1q correlate with thyroid function in autoimmune thyroid disease [79].

Microvesicles are released into the circulation from multiple cell types during apoptosis and reflect metabolic stress. A very recent case–control study from Sweden investigated the number of microvesicles (i.e., diameter < 1 μm) in the blood of patients with GD, which was seen to be increased in the blood of GD patients compared with healthy controls and to remain elevated after medical therapy, albeit at a lower level [80]. This concept might as well offer a new biomarker to guide future treatment decisions in patients with GD.

Increased IFN levels

Although it has been known since 1962 that TRAb have a causal role in hyperthyroidism, it took almost another 30 years until the precise nature of their involvement was further elucidated [81]. Interestingly, anti-TG and anti-thyroperoxidase antibodies can precede autoimmune thyroid pathologies by years, while TRAb appear in serum only a few months prior to a diagnosis of GD [3]. This underscores the fact that their involvement occurs only at the very end of the autoimmune reaction culminating in the onset of GD. TRAb can have stimulating (TSAb), blocking (TBAb), or neutral (TBII) abilities. Nevertheless, roughly 5% of patients are negative for these antibodies (even those positive for anti-thyroperoxidase antibodies) [82]. Most researchers believe that these patients have circulating antibodies that are not detected by currently available assays or that production is confined to the thyroid gland and adjacent lymph nodes [83, 84]. Furthermore, it has been shown that TRAb-negative patients have less severe hyperthyroidism and fewer of them subsequently develop Graves’ orbitopathy [83].

Based on these facts, GD has long been viewed solely as a Th2-induced B cell illness. However, evidence outlined below suggests that the initial phase is governed predominantly by Th1 cells infiltrating the thyroid. IFN-γ and TNF-α produced by APCs and B cells stimulate the secretion of C-X-C motif chemokine 10 (CXCL10) by thyrocytes in vitro [85]. It is believed that CXCL10 may then attract Th cells by binding to its cognate receptor (CXCR3), and that this effect is more prominent in patients with higher CXCL10 serum levels [86]. These T cells cross-react with B cells for the production of TSAb, constituting the IgG1 subclass [82]. This concept is supported by the fact that induction of GD by TSH-R-encoding adenoviruses is dampened if the genes encoding IL-4 or IFN-γ are absent in corresponding knockout mice, indicating that both Th1 and Th2 cytokines are needed [87]. In addition, CXCL10 serum levels are much higher in GD patients in the active phase of the disease and decrease during treatment with ATD both in vitro and in vivo and after radioactive iodine therapy. Serum CXCL10, in particular, drops dramatically after thyroidectomy, suggesting that thyrocytes are the main source of its production [3].

Later on in the mechanism, intrathyroidal Th2 cells inhibit Th1 responses through the secretion of IL-10, IL-5, and IL-4 [88]. These cytokines might prevent autoimmune destruction of the thyroid gland by placing Th1 cells into an anergic state and inhibiting macrophage activation by preventing further IFN-γ secretion [89]. Furthermore, they might protect thyrocytes from apoptosis via the Fas/FasL (CD95/CD95L) system through upregulation of two anti-apoptotic proteins, BCL-XL and cFLIP, leading to increased production and release of the caspase 8 inhibitor protein into the serum [63, 89]. This mechanism might explain why thyrocytes from GD patients survive the autoimmune response, whereas those from patients with HT do not [64]. Additionally, the increased Th2 response leads to an increased production of TBAb, composed by all IgG subclasses [88].

Another novel cytokine is osteopontin (OPN), first discovered in 1986 in osteoblasts, but not until recently has its role in AID been further elucidated. OPN is released by various cell types, including chondrocytes, dendritic cells, T cells, and macrophages, after stimulation by pro-inflammatory events or cytokines (i.e., angiotensin II, TGF-β, TNF-α, IL-1b, nitric oxide, hyperglycemia, and hypoxia) [90]. It exerts its effects via the NF-κB pathway and consecutive production of IFN-γ and IL-12 stimulating Th1 cells. Further, OPN secreted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) also induces expression of CD40L on Th cells in vitro, which in turn stimulates B cells [91, 92]. Thus far, there are only a few case–control studies analyzing the effect of OPN on the development of GD. Its production seems to be positively correlated with the CCL20 cytokine secreted by Th cells in the plasma of GD patients [93]. Additionally, OPN can induce expression of CCL21 from cultured PBMCs in a dose- and time-dependent manner [94], and its plasma levels are positively correlated with biochemical disease severity in GD [90]. Taken together, these results suggest that OPN could be used as a biomarker of GD.

Mutations affecting B cell function – primary antibody deficiencies

Selective IgA-deficiency is the most prevalent form of antibody deficiency worldwide. The diagnosis is made when IgA is not detectable in serum (<0.07 g/L, 10-fold lower than the lower limit of serum IgA in healthy controls), while serum IgG and IgM are normal. Selective IgA deficiency is particularly common in Caucasians, with a prevalence of roughly 1 in 500 in Europe [95]. Although many patients with selective IgA deficiency do not have symptoms, some display recurrent infections of the gastrointestinal tract and airways. Of note, considerable numbers of subjects develop AIDs such as celiac disease, type 1 diabetes mellitus, SLE, and GD [95]. Selective IgA deficiency is not due to mutations in the gene encoding for IgA, but is associated with specific HLA genotypes [96]. A recent GWAS analysis showed association of selective IgA deficiency with alterations in various genes involved in intestinal IgA production and Treg cell function [97]. The association of selective IgA deficiency with Treg cell function might partly explain the clinical association with AIDs in general and GD in particular.

A highly debatable aspect may provide a plausible connection between GD and immunoglobulin G4-related disease, which represents a newly defined AID sub-entity that can affect various tissues and whose pathogenesis is still poorly understood [98]. Diagnostic criteria are an elevated serum IgG4 and high numbers of IgG4-positive plasma cells in biopsies. Increased IgG4 levels in sera from GD patients have been reported [99]. Importantly, IgG4 levels may be falsely measured as too low due to a ‘hook’ effect in current assays [100]. On the other hand, a recent extensive report did not find the typical histopathological changes in thyroid samples from GD patients that would be needed to fulfill diagnostic criteria [101].

As mentioned above, BAFF is a B cell survival factor that may be involved in the pathogenesis of GD [102]. In a mouse model of GD, administration of a scavenging BAFF antibody led to amelioration of hyperthyroidism and reduction of TRAb levels in the blood, whereas plasma cell counts in the spleen were unchanged [103]. In humans, BAFF serum levels in GD patients are elevated compared to healthy controls [104]. Interestingly, BAFF levels decline in patients after treatment with corticosteroids [105]. Recently, the BAFF rs2893321 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) was described and shown to increase the risk of GD, showing an association with lower TRAb levels in men, but not in women [106]. Similarly, a polymorphism in the BAFF receptor at amino acid position 21 (P21R) has been functionally analyzed in detail [107]. This polymorphism results in a BAFF receptor expressed as a monomer instead of a trimer, and hence promotes a reduced response to BAFF signals. The P21R variant is enriched in cohorts of patients with antibody deficiency and is under-represented in patients with chronic lymphatic leukemia. Nevertheless, whether the P21R BAFF receptor variant is associated with GD has not yet been analyzed.

CD40, which is present on many APCs including macrophages and B cells, belongs to the TNF-receptor superfamily and provides co-stimulatory effects following binding to CD40L/CD154 on activated T cells, inducing immunoglobulin class switching [5]. Loss-of-function mutations in the CD40L/CD40 pathway lead to hyper-IgM syndrome [108]. These patients can present with AIDs as well as with recurrent infections. Several SNPs in CD40/CD40L increase vulnerability to GD by upregulation of CD40 on thyrocytes and/or B cells, leading to amplified secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines [14, 54].

Many new concepts concerning immune tolerance and autoimmunity have emerged in recent years, and these have been illustrated in Fig. 2. In our view, a single ideal target that would be a therapeutic breakthrough has not been tackled so far.

Immunologic view on epigenetic factors associated with GD

As mentioned above, concordance of GD in monozygotic twins is 75%, indicating that epigenetic modifications have an important role in GD. A significant impact of epigenetic modifications has been described in patients with PIDs. Indeed, a recent in-depth analysis of epigenetic modifications in two monozygotic twins discordant for antibody deficiency showed a gain in DNA methylation of several genes critically involved in B cell function in the twin with antibody deficiency [109].

In general, epigenetic changes (for instance, histone methylation) can either intensify or reduce gene expression, depending on the number and location of the added methyl groups. This process is executed by histone methyltransferases, which use S-adenosyl-methionine to add up to three methyl groups on lysine or arginine residues [110]. In patients with GD, one report found an interaction between a non-coding homozygous SNP in intron 1 of the TSH-receptor gene in human thymus cells (from children who underwent thoracic surgery) associated with reduced TSH-R expression and histone methylation patterns that could be influenced by the addition of IFN-α to cell cultures [111]. This mechanism could expedite the release of auto-reactive T cells from central tolerance. Especially in the case of the TSH-receptor gene, this leads to diminished apoptosis of autoreactive T cells in the thymus [15, 112, 113].

Micro-RNAs are also involved in epigenetic regulation. MicroRNAs are usually 22 nucleotides long and decrease translation of a given gene by interfering with its mRNA, either by cleaving mRNA when both sequences match fully, or by simply repressing translation if the sequences only match partially [114]. Using microRNA assays, one analysis showed that the number and function of CD4+ CD25+ FOXP3+ Treg cells was significantly reduced in the blood of GD patients [115]. Likewise, the retinoic acid pathway was suppressed in those Treg cells and could be restored by in vitro application of the agonist all-trans retinoic acid.

Positively charged histones that strongly bind to the negatively charged DNA and hamper DNA transcription represent another possible mechanism of epigenetic transformation. Acetylation of lysine residues at the ends of the histones decreases their positive charge and promotes DNA transformation from its condensed heterochromatin to its unfolded euchromatin structure [116]. The process is facilitated by histone acetyltransferase and histone deacetylase, with the acetyl groups being provided by acetyl coenzyme-A. We found only one study evaluating the extent of histone acetylation in GD [117], where a decreased histone 4 acetylation in PBMCs was reported. The clinical significance of this finding is yet unclear, as patients with many other AIDs present with altered acetylation patterns.

DNA methylation also serves to inactivate one X chromosome in females. Initially, X inactivation was thought to be a random event. However, different degrees of escape combined with predominant inactivation of one X chromosome might explain the increased susceptibility of females to AIDs. A case–control study from the United States found a skewed inactivation of the X chromosome (arbitrarily defined as > 80%) in patients with GD and HT [118]. Although it is still not clear how the skewed inactivation influences the risk of GD, it is assumed that reduced expression of X chromosome-dependent self-antigens in the thymus primes inadequate T cell apoptosis [119]. Further, several PID genes are X-linked such as the genes for Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein, CD40L, or the IL-2 receptor gamma chain.

Differential histone methylation patterns may also be involved in peripheral tolerance. A report demonstrated specific patterns of hyper- and hypomethylation of histones in genes involved in T cell signaling (i.e., CD247, LCK, ZAP70, CD3D, CD3E, CD3G, CTLA4, and CD8A) in CD8+ and CD4+ T cells purified from whole blood [119]. Given the many signaling pathways involved, this results in vast possibilities with regard to potential influences on immune regulation.

The most potent form of epigenetic change is DNA methylation by a group of DNA methyltransferases at the 5’ carbon on the pyrimidine ring of cytosine using S-adenosyl-methionine as a co-factor [114]. This methylation process is usually permanent and results in a more condensed chromatin with reduced gene transcription. Many gene promoters in AIDs are hypomethylated, consequently enhancing transcription (e.g., PRF1 in SLE) [120]. A recent Chinese case–control study of genome-wide methylation reported that untreated female GD patients had significantly decreased methylation of the ICAM-1 gene in leukocytes from whole blood [121]; as a consequence, they had higher ICAM-1 mRNA expression levels than normal controls. The authors concluded that this overall increased expression of ICAM-1 on blood cells may support the inflammatory process. However, this association has only been found in females and the results will also need to be replicated in patients of non-Asian descent.

As most studies reviewed here are based on a case–control design, the possibility cannot be excluded that epigenetic changes have occurred spontaneously during the course of treatment, have even been introduced by therapy, or that other co-variables, such as smoking, also play a role. Additionally, hyperthyroidism itself may be inducing epigenetic changes. Nevertheless, we are not aware of any longitudinal reports to date that might shed new light on this topic.

Discussion

Summary of evidence

Although there has been extensive research on the etiology of GD in the last decades, it has not been possible to identify a single causative agent, likely reflecting the fine balance between anergy and autoimmunity challenging our immune system throughout life.

Genetic influences have been extensively studied. Disappointingly, effect sizes of genetic predictors remain rather weak, with ORs of approximately 2, albeit with HLA-loci being the strongest. In a recent systematic review, we summarized the different genetic susceptibility factors [122]. Environmental influences seem to account for approximately 20% of the disease susceptibility. A modification of risk factors before disease onset would require a public health interventions and is unlikely to be accomplished. On the other hand, specific interventions altering environmental influences after onset may be beneficial in ameliorating disease course. Influences of overlapping factors, such as antibodies and cytokines, are hard to quantify. Nonetheless, they might offer a valuable link between the genetic and environmental factors as they are the most amenable to modification.

A diverse and multi-faceted etiology is more likely than a single causative agent, reflecting GD as a heterogeneous syndrome harboring elements of both immunodeficiency and autoimmunity. Consequently, future therapeutic strategies must consider multiple approaches to tackle this condition.

Therapeutic outlook

Since their advent in the 1940s, ATDs have served as the backbone of GD treatment, although drug withdrawal results in high relapse rates (ranging from 30% to 60%) [4, 123]. Since their inception, it has been debated whether these drugs themselves harbor immunosuppressive properties, a hypothesis that has been supported by in vivo studies reporting reduced ICAM-1, IL-2, and IL-6 serum levels [4, 124]. Additionally, there is evidence from in vitro studies describing increased apoptosis of intrathyroidal lymphocytes and increased numbers of Treg cells, along with decreased HLA class II expression and decreased numbers of Th cells and natural killer cells during ATD therapy [124].

However, some findings contradict this hypothesis. First, in vivo immune changes are superimposed by a simultaneous resolution of hyperthyroidism. Secondly, if a true immunosuppressive effect of ATDs were to be present, one would expect a dose-dependent increase in remission rates. However, a Cochrane meta-analysis found that neither longer treatments nor higher doses with a block-and-replace regimen provided any benefit, but were instead associated with a higher rate of side effects [125].

Various cytokines could serve as biomarkers for GD or may even provide a therapeutic angle, for instance, by damping their action by anti-cytokine antibodies (ACAs) [126]. In AIDs, ACAs seem to have both beneficial and detrimental effects. A prototypic disease in this regard is pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, in which autoantibodies are directed against granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor [127], inhibiting the differentiation and function of alveolar macrophages and resulting in deposition of lipids and proteins within the alveoli, causing recurrent infections and respiratory insufficiency. There are studies showing an inverse correlation between disease severity and ACA levels, for instance, in rheumatoid arthritis or Guillain–Barré syndrome, but there is also evidence indicating an increased disease severity with higher levels of ACAs, for instance in SLE [126]. In this light, a phase II multi-center trial in rheumatoid arthritis resistant to anti-TNF-α antibody treatment showed promising results [128] – patients treated with a TNF-kinoid not only developed neutralizing antibodies, but also had a trend towards improved clinical symptoms.

Reports with rituximab treatment (anti-CD20 antibody) in GD with or without ophthalmopathy have not been able to match expectations with regards to reduction in hyperthyroidism relapses or improved ophthalmopathy superior to that seen with glucocorticoids [87, 129, 130], likely due to the fact that rituximab targets only immature B cells, whereas mature plasma cells producing TRAb remain unharmed.

The fact that epigenetic modifications contribute to disease susceptibility and that the regulating steps are controlled by enzymes offers a potential new therapeutic approach [27]. In oncological indications such drugs have already been approved for treatment [131]. Although epigenetic drugs lack cellular specificity and thus have an increased potential for toxicity, they offer the advantage of intervening at a very early stage of the disease process [113].

TRAb are regarded as an integral part of the final common pathway since their presence inevitably leads to GD [13, 87]. Therefore, it could be envisaged that clearing these antibodies from circulation would result in rapid amelioration of disease. A method to clear the TRAb from the peripheral circulation could be the use of monoclonal antibodies directed against TRAb themselves. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no such reports in the medical literature, except for an isolated publication from 1984 describing the formation of antibodies by injecting TRAb sera from patients into rabbits [132]. Nevertheless, in similar attempts in GD patients suffering from orbitopathy, administration of intravenous immunoglobulins of human origin did not show superior results compared with intravenous glucocorticoid treatment [133, 134]. Treatment with small molecule ligands blocking transduction of TSH-R signals through the binding to transmembrane helices and preventing their outward movement is further options, as is the use of antibodies that imitate TBII activity and prevent binding of TSAb by occupying the TSH-R [135]. An advantage of the final two options is the possibility of a combined effect on both thyroidal and orbital disease.

Conclusions

Emerging evidence suggests that AIDs and diseases of immunodeficiency are not two distinct phenomena, but are in fact two sides of the same coin. This relationship has been repeatedly established in monogenetic diseases as IPEX (FOXP3 mutations) and in autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1 (AIRE mutations). Moreover, polygenetic AIDs such as CVID or IgA-deficiency also exhibit multiple autoimmune phenomena, resulting in SLE, rheumatoid arthritis, and enteropathy. Thus, we believe that patients with GD in fact have either a genetically determined or secondarily acquired immunodeficiency that results in autoimmunity once certain triggering events occur.

Whereas both morbidity and mortality are high in other AIDs, GD is clinically much less severe. This being the case, there has been no urgent need for advances in the therapeutic regimen. Nonetheless, we believe that the current treatment approaches have a lack of specificity and can have undesired consequences (e.g., persistent hypoparathyroidism and laryngeal palsy in surgery or worsening of Graves’ orbitopathy in radioactive iodine treatment). There is thus a need for concerted efforts that warrant further investments.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Editorial review was performed by Prasad Kulkarni, PhD, CMPP of Asclepius Medical Communications LLC, Ridgewood, New Jersey, USA, and was funded by the authors.

Funding

This study was supported in part by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF Professorships for PS PP00P3_150531/1 and MR PP00P3_144863) and the Research Council of the Kantonsspital Aarau (1410.000.044). Funders had no role in the design, analysis, or writing of this article.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Authors’ contributions

TS, AK, BM, and PS initially conceptualized this review. MR rendered support related to the discussion of the immunological aspects of the disease. All authors searched the literature and reviewed the references retrieved through the search. TS wrote the first draft of the manuscript and had primary responsibility for final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

All authors declare they have no competing interest.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Medical University Department, Clinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Kantonsspital Aarau
(2)
Medical Clinic, Department for Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Kantonsspital Luzern
(3)
Medical Faculty of the University of Basel
(4)
Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, University Hospital and University Basel
(5)
Medical Outpatient Clinic and Immunodeficiency Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital and University Basel

References

  1. Arkwright PD, Abinun M, Cant AJ. Autoimmunity in human primary immunodeficiency diseases. Blood. 2002;99:2694–702.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Genovese BM, Noureldine SI, Gleeson EM, Tufano RP, Kandil E. What is the best definitive treatment for Graves' disease? A systematic review of the existing literature. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:660–7. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2606-x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonelli A, Ferrari SM, Corrado A, Di Domenicantonio A, Fallahi P. Autoimmune thyroid disorders. Autoimmun Rev. 2015;14:174–80. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2014.10.016.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Brent GA. Clinical practice. Graves' disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2594–605. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp0801880.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Orgiazzi J. Thyroid autoimmunity. Presse Med. 2012;41:25. doi:10.1016/j.lpm.2012.10.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Rabon S, Burton AM, White PC. Graves' disease in children: long term outcomes of medical therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2016;85(4):632–5. doi:10.1111/cen.13099.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Brix TH, Kyvik KO, Christensen K, Hegedus L. Evidence for a major role of heredity in Graves' disease: a population-based study of two Danish twin cohorts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:930–4. doi:10.1210/jcem.86.2.7242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brix TH, Christensen K, Holm NV, Harvald B, Hegedus L. A population-based study of Graves' disease in Danish twins. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1998;48:397–400.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Brix TH, Hegedus L. Twin studies as a model for exploring the aetiology of autoimmune thyroid disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2012;76:457–64. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04318.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hall R, Stanbury JB. Familial studies of autoimmune thyroiditis. Clin Exp Immunol. 1967;2:719–25.PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Prummel M, Strieder T, Wiersinga W. The environment and autoimmune thyroid diseases. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004;150:605–18. doi:10.1530/eje.0.1500605.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. McLeod DS, Cooper DS, Ladenson PW, Whiteman DC, Jordan SJ. Race/Ethnicity and the prevalence of thyrotoxicosis in young Americans. Thyroid. 2015;25:621–8. doi:10.1089/thy.2014.0504.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Irvine WJ, Gray RS, Morris PJ, Ting A. Correlation of HLA and thyroid antibodies with clinical course of thyrotoxicosis treated with antithyroid drugs. Lancet. 1977;29;2(8044):898–900.Google Scholar
  14. Tomer Y. Mechanisms of autoimmune thyroid diseases: from genetics to epigenetics. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis. 2014;9:147–56. doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-012513-104713.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee HJ, Li CW, Hammerstad SS, Stefan M, Tomer Y. Immunogenetics of autoimmune thyroid diseases: A comprehensive review. J Autoimmun. 2015;64:82–90. doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2015.07.009.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kourtis AP, Read JS, Jamieson DJ. Pregnancy and infection. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2211–8. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1213566.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Weetman AP. Immunity, thyroid function and pregnancy: molecular mechanisms. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2010;6:311–8. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2010.46.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Figueiredo AS, Schumacher A. The T helper type 17/regulatory T cell paradigm in pregnancy. Immunology. 2016;148:13–21. doi:10.1111/imm.12595.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ruocco MG, Chaouat G, Florez L, Bensussan A, Klatzmann D. Regulatory T-cells in pregnancy: historical perspective, state of the art, and burning questions. Front Immunol. 2014;5:389. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2014.00389.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Aranha AA, Amer S, Reda ES, Broadley SA, Davoren PM. Autoimmune thyroid disease in the use of alemtuzumab for multiple sclerosis: a review. Endocr Pract. 2013;19:821–8. doi:10.4158/EP13020.RA.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Thompson SA, Jones JL, Cox AL, Compston DA, Coles AJ. B-cell reconstitution and BAFF after alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) treatment of multiple sclerosis. J Clin Immunol. 2010;30:99–105. doi:10.1007/s10875-009-9327-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. MacKay F, Woodcock SA, Lawton P, Ambrose C, Baetscher M, Schneider P, et al. Mice transgenic for BAFF develop lymphocytic disorders along with autoimmune manifestations. J Exp Med. 1999;190:1697–710.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu Z, Davidson A. BAFF and selection of autoreactive B cells. Trends Immunol. 2011;32:388–94. doi:10.1016/j.it.2011.06.004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Meffre E, Wardemann H. B-cell tolerance checkpoints in health and autoimmunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2008;20:632–8. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2008.09.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Vestergaard P. Smoking and thyroid disorders--a meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002;146:153–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Wiersinga WM. Smoking and thyroid. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013;79:145–51. doi:10.1111/cen.12222.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Rodriguez-Paredes M, Esteller M. Cancer epigenetics reaches mainstream oncology. Nat Med. 2011;17:330–9. doi:10.1038/nm.2305.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang H, Liao H, Ochani M, Justiniani M, Lin X, Yang L, et al. Cholinergic agonists inhibit HMGB1 release and improve survival in experimental sepsis. Nat Med. 2004;10:1216–21. doi:10.1038/nm1124.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Marcocci C, Kahaly GJ, Krassas GE, Bartalena L, Prummel M, Stahl M, et al. Selenium and the course of mild Graves' orbitopathy. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1920–31. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1012985.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Watt T, Cramon P, Bjorner JB, Bonnema SJ, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Gluud C, et al. Selenium supplementation for patients with Graves' hyperthyroidism (the GRASS trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:119. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-119.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Duntas LH. The role of iodine and selenium in autoimmune thyroiditis. Horm Metab Res. 2015;47:721–6. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1559631.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Goodnow CC. Pathways for self-tolerance and the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Lancet. 2001;357:2115–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Sakaguchi N, Miyai K, Sakaguchi S. Ionizing radiation and autoimmunity. Induction of autoimmune disease in mice by high dose fractionated total lymphoid irradiation and its prevention by inoculating normal T cells. J Immunol. 1994;152:2586–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. DeGroot LJ. Effects of irradiation on the thyroid gland. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1993;22:607–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Constine LS, McDougall IR. Radiation therapy for Hodgkin's disease followed by hypothyroidism and then Graves' hyperthyroidism. Clin Nucl Med. 1982;7:69–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Ostroumova E, Rozhko A, Hatch M, Furukawa K, Polyanskaya O, McConnell RJ, et al. Measures of thyroid function among Belarusian children and adolescents exposed to iodine-131 from the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear plant. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121:865–71. doi:10.1289/ehp.1205783.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Weetman A. Immune reconstitution syndrome and the thyroid. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;23:693–702. doi:10.1016/j.beem.2009.07.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Fry TJ, Connick E, Falloon J, Lederman MM, Liewehr DJ, Spritzler J, et al. A potential role for interleukin-7 in T-cell homeostasis. Blood. 2001;97:2983–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang XS, Li BZ, Hu LF, Wen PF, Zhang M, Pan HF, Ye DQ. Perspectives of the relationship between IL-7 and autoimmune diseases. Clin Rheumatol. 2013;32:1703–9. doi:10.1007/s10067-013-2360-x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Sheikh V, Porter BO, DerSimonian R, Kovacs SB, Thompson WL, Perez-Diez A, et al. Administration of interleukin-7 increases CD4 T cells in idiopathic CD4 lymphocytopenia. Blood. 2016;127:977–88. doi:10.1182/blood-2015-05-645077.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Andersson J, Boasso A, Nilsson J, Zhang R, Shire NJ, Lindback S, et al. The prevalence of regulatory T cells in lymphoid tissue is correlated with viral load in HIV-infected patients. J Immunol. 2005;174:3143–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Shenkman L, Bottone EJ. Antibodies to Yersinia enterocolitica in thyroid disease. Ann Intern Med. 1976;85:735–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Bech K, Hannover Larsen J, Mlholm Hansen J, Nerup J. Yersinia enterocolitica infection and thyroid disorders. Lancet. 1974;304:951–2. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(74)91152-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Bech K, Nerup J, Larsen JH. Yersinia enterocolitica infection and thyroid diseases. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1977;84:87–92.Google Scholar
  45. Hargreaves CE, Grasso M, Hampe CS, Stenkova A, Atkinson S, Joshua GW, et al. Yersinia enterocolitica provides the link between thyroid-stimulating antibodies and their germline counterparts in Graves' disease. J Immunol. 2013;190:5373–81. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1203412.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Mandac JC, Chaudhry S, Sherman KE, Tomer Y. The clinical and physiological spectrum of interferon-alpha induced thyroiditis: toward a new classification. Hepatology. 2006;43:661–72. doi:10.1002/hep.21146.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Monzani F, Caraccio N, Dardano A, Ferrannini E. Thyroid autoimmunity and dysfunction associated with type I interferon therapy. Clin Exp Med. 2004;3:199–210. doi:10.1007/s10238-004-0026-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Martocchia A, Falaschi P. Amino acid sequence homologies between HCV polyprotein and thyroid antigens. Intern Emerg Med. 2007;2:65–7. doi:10.1007/s11739-007-0018-x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Crow YJ, Manel N. Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome and the type I interferonopathies. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15:429–40. doi:10.1038/nri3850.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Cattalini M, Galli J, Andreoli L, Olivieri I, Ariaudo G, Fredi M, et al. Exploring autoimmunity in a cohort of children with genetically confirmed Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome. J Clin Immunol. 2016;36:693–9. doi:10.1007/s10875-016-0325-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Aversa T, Lombardo F, Valenzise M, Messina MF, Sferlazzas C, Salzano G, et al. Peculiarities of autoimmune thyroid diseases in children with Turner or Down syndrome: an overview. Ital J Pediatr. 2015;41:39. doi:10.1186/s13052-015-0146-2.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. de Luca F, Corrias A, Salerno M, Wasniewska M, Gastaldi R, Cassio A, et al. Peculiarities of Graves' disease in children and adolescents with Down's syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2010;162:591–5. doi:10.1530/EJE-09-0751.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Sullivan KD, Lewis HC, Hill AA, Pandey A, Jackson LP, Cabral JM, et al. Trisomy 21 consistently activates the interferon response. Elife. 2016;5, e16220. doi:10.7554/eLife.16220.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Ploski R, Szymanski K, Bednarczuk T. The genetic basis of graves' disease. Curr Genomics. 2011;12:542–63. doi:10.2174/138920211798120772.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Tomer Y, Ban Y, Concepcion E, Barbesino G, Villanueva R, Greenberg DA, Davies TF. Common and unique susceptibility loci in Graves and Hashimoto diseases: results of whole-genome screening in a data set of 102 multiplex families. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73:736–47. doi:10.1086/378588.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Ban Y, Greenberg DA, Concepcion E, Skrabanek L, Villanueva R, Tomer Y. Amino acid substitutions in the thyroglobulin gene are associated with susceptibility to human and murine autoimmune thyroid disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:15119–24. doi:10.1073/pnas.2434175100.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Jacobson EM, Yang H, Menconi F, Wang R, Osman R, Skrabanek L, et al. Employing a recombinant HLA-DR3 expression system to dissect major histocompatibility complex II-thyroglobulin peptide dynamism: a genetic, biochemical, and reverse immunological perspective. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:34231–43. doi:10.1074/jbc.M109.041574.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Kanistras I, Hatzioannou A, Lymberi P. A novel pathogenic peptide of thyroglobulin (2208-2227) induces autoreactive T-cell and B-cell responses in both high and low responder mouse strains. Immunology. 2014;142:300–6. doi:10.1111/imm.12254.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Gokturk B, Keles S, Kirac M, Artac H, Tokgoz H, Guner SN, et al. CD3G gene defects in familial autoimmune thyroiditis. Scand J Immunol. 2014;80:354–61. doi:10.1111/sji.12200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Marino M, Latrofa F, Menconi F, Chiovato L, Vitti P. Role of genetic and non-genetic factors in the etiology of Graves' disease. J Endocrinol Invest. 2015;38:283–94. doi:10.1007/s40618-014-0214-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Colobran R, Gimenez-Barcons M, Marin-Sanchez A, Porta-Pardo E, Pujol-Borrell R. AIRE genetic variants and predisposition to polygenic autoimmune disease: The case of Graves' disease and a systematic literature review. Hum Immunol. 2016;77:643–51. doi:10.1016/j.humimm.2016.06.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Bona G, Defranco S, Chiocchetti A, Indelicato M, Biava A, Difranco D, et al. Defective function of Fas in T cells from paediatric patients with autoimmune thyroid diseases. Clin Exp Immunol. 2003;133:430–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Fountoulakis S, Vartholomatos G, Kolaitis N, Frillingos S, Philippou G, Tsatsoulis A. Differential expression of Fas system apoptotic molecules in peripheral lymphocytes from patients with Graves' disease and Hashimoto's thyroiditis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008;158:853–9. doi:10.1530/EJE-08-0092.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Salmaso C, Bagnasco M, Pesce G, Montagna P, Brizzolara R, Altrinetti V, et al. Regulation of apoptosis in endocrine autoimmunity: insights from Hashimoto's thyroiditis and Graves' disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;966:496–501.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Bacchetta R, Barzaghi F, Roncarolo MG. From IPEX syndrome to FOXP3 mutation: a lesson on immune dysregulation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016. doi:10.1111/nyas.13011.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Pellegrini FP, Marinoni M, Frangione V, Tedeschi A, Gandini V, Ciglia F, et al. Down syndrome, autoimmunity and T regulatory cells. Clin Exp Immunol. 2012;169:238–43. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2012.04610.x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Caudy AA, Reddy ST, Chatila T, Atkinson JP, Verbsky JW. CD25 deficiency causes an immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked-like syndrome, and defective IL-10 expression from CD4 lymphocytes. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;119:482–7. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2006.10.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Mao C, Wang S, Xiao Y, Xu J, Jiang Q, Jin M, et al. Impairment of regulatory capacity of CD4 + CD25+ regulatory T cells mediated by dendritic cell polarization and hyperthyroidism in Graves' disease. J Immunol. 2011;186:4734–43. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0904135.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Chistiakov DA, Chistiakova EI, Voronova NV, Turakulov RI, Savost'anov KV. A variant of the Il2ra / Cd25 gene predisposing to graves' disease is associated with increased levels of soluble interleukin-2 receptor. Scand J Immunol. 2011;74:496–501. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3083.2011.02608.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Song ZY, Liu W, Xue LQ, Pan CM, Wang HN, Gu ZH, et al. Dense mapping of IL2RA shows no association with Graves' disease in Chinese Han population. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013;79:267–74. doi:10.1111/cen.12115.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Qureshi OS, Zheng Y, Nakamura K, Attridge K, Manzotti C, Schmidt EM, et al. Trans-endocytosis of CD80 and CD86: a molecular basis for the cell-extrinsic function of CTLA-4. Science. 2011;332:600–3. doi:10.1126/science.1202947.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Zarour HM. Reversing T-cell dysfunction and exhaustion in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:1856–64. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1849.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Corsello SM, Barnabei A, Marchetti P, de Vecchis L, Salvatori R, Torino F. Endocrine side effects induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:1361–75. doi:10.1210/jc.2012-4075.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Narita T, Oiso N, Taketomo Y, Okahashi K, Yamauchi K, Sato M, et al. Serological aggravation of autoimmune thyroid disease in two cases receiving nivolumab. J Dermatol. 2016;43:210–4. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.13028.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Schubert D, Bode C, Kenefeck R, Hou TZ, Wing JB, Kennedy A, et al. Autosomal dominant immune dysregulation syndrome in humans with CTLA4 mutations. Nat Med. 2014;20:1410–6. doi:10.1038/nm.3746.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Wickman G, Julian L, Olson MF. How apoptotic cells aid in the removal of their own cold dead bodies. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19:735–42. doi:10.1038/cdd.2012.25.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. van Schaarenburg RA, Schejbel L, Truedsson L, Topaloglu R, Al-Mayouf SM, Riordan A, et al. Marked variability in clinical presentation and outcome of patients with C1q immunodeficiency. J Autoimmun. 2015;62:39–44. doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2015.06.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Hanayama R, Tanaka M, Miyasaka K, Aozasa K, Koike M, Uchiyama Y, Nagata S. Autoimmune disease and impaired uptake of apoptotic cells in MFG-E8-deficient mice. Science. 2004;304:1147–50. doi:10.1126/science.1094359.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Potlukova E, Jiskra J, Limanova Z, Kralikova P, Smutek D, Mareckova H, et al. Autoantibodies against complement C1q correlate with the thyroid function in patients with autoimmune thyroid disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008;153:96–101. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03670.x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Mobarrez F, Abraham-Nordling M, Aguilera-Gatica K, Friberg I, Antovic A, Pisetsky DS, et al. The expression of microvesicles in the blood of patients with Graves' disease and its relationship to treatment. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2016;84:729–35. doi:10.1111/cen.12872.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Weetman AP. Grave's disease 1835-2002. Horm Res. 2003;59 Suppl 1:114–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Kristensen B. Regulatory B and T cell responses in patients with autoimmune thyroid disease and healthy controls. Dan Med J. 2016;63(2):1–27.Google Scholar
  83. Vos XG, Smit N, Endert E, Tijssen JG, Wiersinga WM. Frequency and characteristics of TBII-seronegative patients in a population with untreated Graves' hyperthyroidism: a prospective study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2008;69:311–7. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03192.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Rees SB, McLachlan SM, Furmaniak J. Autoantibodies to the thyrotropin receptor. Endocr Rev. 1988;9:106–21. doi:10.1210/edrv-9-1-106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Ruffilli I, Ferrari SM, Colaci M, Ferri C, Fallahi P, Antonelli A. IP-10 in autoimmune thyroiditis. Horm Metab Res. 2014;46:597–602. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1382053.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Leporati P, Groppelli G, Zerbini F, Rotondi M, Chiovato L. Etiopathogenesis of Basedow's disease. Trends and current aspects. Nuklearmedizin. 2015;54:204–10. doi:10.3413/Nukmed-0739-15-04.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. McLachlan SM, Rapoport B. Breaking tolerance to thyroid antigens: changing concepts in thyroid autoimmunity. Endocr Rev. 2014;35:59–105. doi:10.1210/er.2013-1055.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. McLachlan SM. Guest Editorial: Graves’ Disease: The TH1/TH2 Paradigm versus the “Hygiene” Hypothesis and Defective Immune Regulation. Thyroid. 2003;13:127–8. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00768.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Stassi G, de Maria R. Autoimmune thyroid disease: new models of cell death in autoimmunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:195–204. doi:10.1038/nri750.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Reza S, Shaukat A, Arain TM, Riaz QS, Mahmud M. Expression of osteopontin in patients with thyroid dysfunction. PLoS One. 2013;8, e56533. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056533.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Xu L, Ma X, Wang Y, Li X, Qi Y, Cui B, et al. The expression and pathophysiological role of osteopontin in Graves' disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:E1866–70. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-1339.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Qi Y, Li X, Ma X, Xu L, Zhang X, Jiang X, et al. The role of osteopontin in the induction of the CD40 ligand in Graves' disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2014;80:128–34. doi:10.1111/cen.12229.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Li X, Qi Y, Ma X, Huang F, Guo H, Jiang X, et al. Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 20, a potential biomarker for Graves' disease, is regulated by osteopontin. PLoS One. 2013;8, e64277. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064277.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Qi Y, Li X, Zhang Q, Huang F, Lin D, Zhou Y, et al. Increased chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 21 expression and its correlation with osteopontin in Graves' disease. Endocrine. 2015;50:123–9. doi:10.1007/s12020-015-0552-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Singh K, Chang C, Gershwin ME. IgA deficiency and autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13:163–77. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2013.10.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Mohammadi J, Ramanujam R, Jarefors S, Rezaei N, Aghamohammadi A, Gregersen PK, Hammarstrom L. IgA deficiency and the MHC: assessment of relative risk and microheterogeneity within the HLA A1 B8, DR3 (8.1) haplotype. J Clin Immunol. 2010;30:138–43. doi:10.1007/s10875-009-9336-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Bronson PG, Chang D, Bhangale T, Seldin MF, Ortmann W, Ferreira RC, et al. Common variants at PVT1, ATG13-AMBRA1, AHI1 and CLEC16A are associated with selective IgA deficiency. Nat Genet. 2016. doi:10.1038/ng.3675.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  98. Della-Torre E, Lanzillotta M, Doglioni C. Immunology of IgG4-related disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 2015;181:191–206. doi:10.1111/cei.12641.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Takeshima K, Inaba H, Furukawa Y, Nishi M, Yamaoka H, Miyamoto W, et al. Elevated serum immunoglobulin G4 levels in patients with Graves' disease and their clinical implications. Thyroid. 2014;24:736–43. doi:10.1089/thy.2013.0448.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Khosroshahi A, Cheryk LA, Carruthers MN, Edwards JA, Bloch DB, Stone JH. Brief Report: spuriously low serum IgG4 concentrations caused by the prozone phenomenon in patients with IgG4-related disease. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:213–7. doi:10.1002/art.38193.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Nishihara E, Hirokawa M, Ito M, Fukata S, Nakamura H, Amino N, Miyauchi A. Graves' disease patients with persistent hyperthyroidism and diffuse lymphoplasmacytic infiltration in the thyroid show no histopathological compatibility with IgG4-related disease. PLoS One. 2015;10, e0134143. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134143.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Thompson JS, Schneider P, Kalled SL, Wang L, Lefevre EA, Cachero TG, et al. BAFF binds to the tumor necrosis factor receptor-like molecule B cell maturation antigen and is important for maintaining the peripheral B cell population. J Exp Med. 2000;192:129–35.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Gilbert JA, Kalled SL, Moorhead J, Hess DM, Rennert P, Li Z, et al. Treatment of autoimmune hyperthyroidism in a murine model of Graves' disease with tumor necrosis factor-family ligand inhibitors suggests a key role for B cell activating factor in disease pathology. Endocrinology. 2006;147:4561–8. doi:10.1210/en.2006-0507.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Fabris M, Grimaldi F, Villalta D, Picierno A, Fabro C, Bolzan M, et al. BLyS and April serum levels in patients with autoimmune thyroid diseases. Autoimmun Rev. 2010;9:165–9. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2009.07.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Vannucchi G, Covelli D, Curro N, Dazzi D, Maffini A, Campi I, et al. Serum BAFF concentrations in patients with Graves' disease and orbitopathy before and after immunosuppressive therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:E755–9. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-2614.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Lin JD, Yang SF, Wang YH, Fang WF, Lin YC, Lin YF, et al. Analysis of Associations of human BAFF gene polymorphisms with autoimmune thyroid diseases. PLoS One. 2016;11, e0154436. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154436.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Pieper K, Rizzi M, Speletas M, Smulski CR, Sic H, Kraus H, et al. A common single nucleotide polymorphism impairs B-cell activating factor receptor's multimerization, contributing to common variable immunodeficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133:1222–5. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2013.11.021.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Qamar N, Fuleihan RL. The hyper IgM syndromes. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2014;46:120–30. doi:10.1007/s12016-013-8378-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Rodriguez-Cortez VC, Del P-ML, Rodriguez-Ubreva J, Ciudad L, Gomez-Cabrero D, Company C, et al. Monozygotic twins discordant for common variable immunodeficiency reveal impaired DNA demethylation during naive-to-memory B-cell transition. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7335. doi:10.1038/ncomms8335.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Wood A, Shilatifard A. Posttranslational modifications of histones by methylation. Adv Protein Chem. 2004;67:201–22. doi:10.1016/S0065-3233(04)67008-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Stefan M, Wei C, Lombardi A, Li CW, Concepcion ES, Inabnet WB, et al. Genetic-epigenetic dysregulation of thymic TSH receptor gene expression triggers thyroid autoimmunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:12562–7. doi:10.1073/pnas.1408821111.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Savino W. The thymus is a common target organ in infectious diseases. PLoS Pathog. 2006;2, e62. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.0020062.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Gupta B, Hawkins RD. Epigenomics of autoimmune diseases. Immunol Cell Biol. 2015;93:271–6. doi:10.1038/icb.2015.18.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Aslani S, Mahmoudi M, Karami J, Jamshidi AR, Malekshahi Z, Nicknam MH. Epigenetic alterations underlying autoimmune diseases. Autoimmunity. 2016;49:69–83. doi:10.3109/08916934.2015.1134511.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. Wang Z, Fan X, Zhang R, Lin Z, Lu T, Bai X, et al. Integrative analysis of mRNA and miRNA array data reveals the suppression of retinoic acid pathway in regulatory T cells of Graves' disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:7. doi:10.1210/jc.2014-1883.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Shahbazian MD, Grunstein M. Functions of site-specific histone acetylation and deacetylation. Annu Rev Biochem. 2007;76:75–100. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.052705.162114.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Yan N, Zhou JZ, Zhang JA, Cai T, Zhang W, Wang Y, et al. Histone hypoacetylation and increased histone deacetylases in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with Graves' disease. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015;414:143–7. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2015.05.037.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Yin X, Latif R, Tomer Y, Davies TF. Thyroid epigenetics: X chromosome inactivation in patients with autoimmune thyroid disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1110:193–200. doi:10.1196/annals.1423.021.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Limbach M, Saare M, Tserel L, Kisand K, Eglit T, Sauer S, et al. Epigenetic profiling in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from Graves' disease patients reveals changes in genes associated with T cell receptor signaling. J Autoimmun. 2016;67:46–56. doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2015.09.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  120. Canas CA, Canas F, Bonilla-Abadia F, Ospina FE, Tobon GJ. Epigenetics changes associated to environmental triggers in autoimmunity. Autoimmunity. 2016;49:1–11. doi:10.3109/08916934.2015.1086996.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  121. Cai TT, Muhali FS, Song RH, Qin Q, Wang X, Shi LF, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis in Graves' disease. Genomics. 2015;105:204–10. doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2015.01.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  122. Struja T, Fehlberg H, Kutz A, Guebelin L, Degen C, Muller B, Schuetz P. Can we predict relapse in Graves' disease? Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017;176(1):87–97. doi:10.1530/EJE-16-0725.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  123. DeGroot LJ. Diagnosis and treatment of Graves' disease. In: de Groot LJ, Beck-Peccoz P, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Grossman A, Hershman JM, et al., editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc; 2000.Google Scholar
  124. Cooper DS. Antithyroid drugs. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:905–17. doi:10.1056/NEJMra042972.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  125. Abraham P, Avenell A, McGeoch SC, Clark LF, Bevan JS. Antithyroid drug regimen for treating Graves' hyperthyroidism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1, CD003420. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003420.pub4.Google Scholar
  126. Cappellano G, Orilieri E, Woldetsadik AD, Boggio E, Soluri MF, Comi C, et al. Anti-cytokine autoantibodies in autoimmune diseases. Am J Clin Exp Immunol. 2012;1:136–46.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  127. Piccoli L, Campo I, Fregni CS, Rodriguez BMF, Minola A, Sallusto F, et al. Neutralization and clearance of GM-CSF by autoantibodies in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7375. doi:10.1038/ncomms8375.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  128. Durez P, Vandepapeliere P, Miranda P, Toncheva A, Berman A, Kehler T, et al. Therapeutic vaccination with TNF-Kinoid in TNF antagonist-resistant rheumatoid arthritis: a phase II randomized, controlled clinical trial. PLoS One. 2014;9, e113465. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113465.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Struja T, Guebelin L, Kutz A, Fehlberg H, Mueller B, Schuetz P. Does immunosuppressive therapy improve outcomes in Graves' disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thyroid. 2016;26:634–40. doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0647.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  130. Stiebel-Kalish H, Robenshtok E, Hasanreisoglu M, Ezrachi D, Shimon I, Leibovici L. Treatment modalities for Graves' ophthalmopathy: systematic review and metaanalysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:2708–16. doi:10.1210/jc.2009-0376.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  131. Ganesan A. Multitarget drugs: an epigenetic epiphany. ChemMedChem. 2016;11(12):1227–41. doi:10.1002/cmdc.201500394.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  132. Baker Jr J, Lukes YG, Burman KD. Production, isolation, and characterization of rabbit anti-idiotypic antibodies directed against human antithyrotrophin receptor antibodies. J Clin Invest. 1984;74:488–95. doi:10.1172/JCI111446.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Kahaly G, Pitz S, Muller-Forell W, Hommel G. Randomized trial of intravenous immunoglobulins versus prednisolone in Graves' ophthalmopathy. Clin Exp Immunol. 1996;106:197–202.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Baschieri L, Antonelli A, Nardi S, Alberti B, Lepri A, Canapicchi R, Fallahi P. Intravenous immunoglobulin versus corticosteroid in treatment of Graves' ophthalmopathy. Thyroid. 1997;7:579–85. doi:10.1089/thy.1997.7.579.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  135. Davies TF, Latif R. Targeting the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor with small molecule ligands and antibodies. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2015;19:835–47. doi:10.1517/14728222.2015.1018181.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement