Skip to main content
Download PDF

Environmental pesticide exposure and non-Hodgkin lymphoma survival: a population-based study

BMC Medicine volume 20, Article number: 165 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

There is evidence indicating that pesticide exposure is a risk factor for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) development. However, the association between pesticide exposure and NHL survival is not well-established.

Methods

Using the California Cancer Registry, we identified patients with a first primary diagnosis of NHL from 2010 to 2016 and linked these patients with CalEnviroScreen 3.0 to obtain production agriculture pesticide exposure to 70 chemicals from the state-mandated Pesticide Use Reporting (PUR) by census tract from 2012 to 2014. In addition, data from PUR was integrated into a geographic information system that employs land-use data to estimate cumulative exposure to specific pesticides previously associated with NHL (glyphosate, organophosphorus, carbamate, phenoxyherbicide, and 2,4-dimethylamine salt) between 10 years prior up to 1 year after NHL diagnosis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the association between total pesticide exposure from CalEnviroScreen 3.0 and individual pesticide exposure from geographic land use data and lymphoma-specific and overall survival.

Results

Among 35,808 NHL patients identified, 44.2% were exposed to pesticide in their census tract of residence. Glyphosate, organophosphorus, carbamate, phenoxyherbicide, and 2,4-dimethylamine salt exposure was observed in 34.1%, 26.0%, 10.6%, 14.0%, and 12.8% of NHL patients, respectively. Total pesticide exposure at the time of diagnosis was not associated with lymphoma-specific or overall survival. In addition, no association was consistently found between glyphosate, organophosphorus, carbamate, phenoxyherbicide, and 2,4 dimethylamine salt exposure and lymphoma-specific or overall survival.

Conclusions

Although we found no consistent associations between agricultural pesticide exposure at the neighborhood level and worse survival, these results provide a platform for designing future studies to determine the association between pesticide and NHL.

Peer Review reports

Background

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), a diverse group of malignant neoplasms variously derived from the clonal expansion of B, T, or natural killer cells, is the most common hematologic malignancy, constituting 4.3% of new neoplasms in the United States and 3.3% of all cancer deaths [1]. It is generally associated with a favorable prognosis, with a 5-year relative survival of 73.2% [1]. While the etiology of most NHLs continues to be largely unknown, its pathogenesis likely represents a complex process involving the accumulation of multiple genetic mutations, together with underlying immune dysfunction [2].

Pesticide includes a diverse group of chemicals or biologic agents applied in agricultural, industrial/commercial, and residential settings to control pests [3, 4]. In the United States alone in 2012, over 1.1 billion pounds of pesticide was utilized [5]. Despite its widespread usage, pesticide exposure has been associated with multiple adverse health effects, including cancer development [6].

There is evidence indicating that pesticide exposure is a risk factor for NHL development. Occupational agricultural exposure has been associated with a higher incidence rate of NHL in multiple studies [7,8,9,10,11,12] and the International Agency for Research on Cancer determined exposure to three commonly used agricultural organophosphates (glyphosate, malathion, and diazinon) to be carcinogenic and associated with NHL development in 2015 [13]. Genotoxicity and reactive oxygen species generation in healthy cells by pesticide used for agricultural production is likely involved in the transformation of healthy lymphocytes into clonal ones. Prolonged environmental exposure to pesticide could lead to clonal expansion of cells with specific tumorigenic alterations and immunodeficiency, potentially contributing to pathogenesis and resistance [14,15,16]. Chronic exposure could also lead to adaptive mechanisms for DNA repair and antioxidant activity, undermining chemotherapy regimens [17]. Furthermore, there is a possibility that carcinogenic effects might not result from direct mutagenic or genotoxic mechanisms from the pesticide itself. For example, endocrine disruption or an indirect initiation of inflammation must be considered as tumor-promoting mechanisms of pesticide [18].

While emphasis has been placed on evaluating pesticide as a causative agent for NHL development, investigation on its association with NHL prognosis also has the potential to provide important insight into NHL etiology and pathogenesis. Only one study thus far has investigated the association between pesticide exposure and NHL treatment outcomes. In a French multicenter retrospective cohort study of 244 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), occupational exposure to pesticide was found to be associated with increased treatment failure and poorer event-free and overall survival compared to those not exposed to pesticide [19]. These findings have yet to be validated and suggest additional adverse implications of pesticide exposure, rationalizing further study. Therefore, we identified NHL patients from the California Cancer Registry and linked these individuals with the statewide pesticide use reporting database to determine the association of pesticide exposure with lymphoma-specific and overall survival.

Methods

Databases

The California Cancer Registry (CCR) is the statewide population-based cancer surveillance system which maintains records about all malignancies diagnosed in California, with the exception of basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. The CCR estimates that >98% of cancer diagnoses in California are captured. CCR data includes the date of diagnosis, primary anatomic site, histologic type, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, initial type of treatment, and sociodemographic information.

The pesticide use reporting (PUR) program contains records of all agricultural pesticide use in California since 1990 and is maintained by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation. Under this state-mandated program, all pesticide applications to parks, golf courses, cemeteries, rangeland, pastures, along roadside and railroads, and all postharvest pesticide treatments of agricultural commodities must be reported monthly. Primary exceptions to reporting requirements include residential and some industrial and institutional applications.

For this study, we utilized CalEnviroScreen 3.0, California’s science-based mapping tool developed by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and California Environment Protection Agency which uses the PUR database to obtain scores of average pollution burden for every census tract in the state.

In addition, data from PUR was integrated with data from land-use surveys [20, 21] (based on California’s Public Land Survey System (PLSS), specifying the exact location of crops on which pesticide was most likely used) to estimate cumulative exposure to specific pesticides. Specifically, the locations of agricultural pesticide applications were reported according to the PLSS, a grid that parcels land into sections with an area of approximately one square mile and is used in the 30 westernmost states formed from lands in the public domain. To improve the scale of available estimates, we combined this data with information from California land-use surveys, the countywide, large-scale surveys (1,24,000, or 1 inch = 2000 feet) of land use and crop cover conducted every 7–10 years. These data are available electronically with land-use types existing as contiguous polygons that are individually linked to their respective attribute information (e.g., land use type, acreage) in a database table. The reconciliation of these datasets was completed using geospatial software that allows for the generation of point estimates (and estimates of their variation) across a continuous spatial surface using the combined datasets. For each location (e.g., a residential address) we derived a summation of pesticide use from the surrounding area.

Patient cohort

Using the CCR, we identified patients with a first primary diagnosis of NHL from 1/1/2010 to 12/31/2016 using specific International Classification of Diseases-Oncology, 3rd edition (ICD-O-3) codes [22,23,24]. Patients with missing data, including date of diagnosis or date of follow-up (n=462), without a known cause of death (n=322) and those with human immunodeficiency virus infection (HIV)/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) (n=1338) or a second malignancy (n=3083) after NHL diagnosis were excluded.

Estimating pesticide exposure

Identified NHL patients were merged by census tract for CalEnviroScreen 3.0 pesticide data. Production agricultural pesticide exposure to 70 chemicals was obtained from 2012 to 2014; the total pounds of selected active ingredients for each census tract was divided by each census tract area to obtain total pounds (lbs) per square mile, averaged over the 3 years [25].

In addition, NHL patients were merged with data from PUR and land-use surveys to estimate for cumulative exposure to specific pesticides previously associated with increased NHL incidence, glyphosate [26, 27], organophosphorus [28,29,30], carbamate [12, 31], phenoxyherbicide [32,33,34], and 2,4-dimethylamine salt [30, 35]. Cumulative pesticide exposure was measured as lbs of pesticide applied per acre/month within 2000 meters from residence at diagnosis, between 10 years prior up to 1 year after NHL diagnosis to include a significant amount of lead time prior to diagnosis through treatment of NHL. Pesticide exposure was then categorically grouped into levels of low, mid, and high exposure based on the tertile distribution of exposure levels for each pesticide.

Covariates

From the CCR, we obtained patient demographics which include gender, race/ethnicity, age and stage at diagnosis, modality of initial therapy, health insurance status, neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES), and rural or urban medical service study area (MSSA) at diagnosis. Initial treatment was identified as either chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. In addition, patients were broadly categorized into the NHL subtypes of DLBCL, follicular lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, small lymphocytic lymphoma, lymphoblastic lymphoma, other B-cell lymphomas, T/NK-cell neoplasms, and unspecified lymphomas.

Statistical analyses

Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify the association between pesticide exposure and lymphoma-specific and overall survival. Models considered five common types of pesticide (glyphosate, organophosphorus, carbamate, phenoxyherbicide, and 2,4-dimethylamine salt) and NHL subtype separately. Models included variables with a priori reasons for inclusion based on previous studies: gender, race/ethnicity, age and stage at diagnosis, modality of initial therapy, health insurance status, neighborhood SES and rural or urban MSSA [36,37,38]. We also examined whether associations between pesticide exposure and survival differed by race/ethnicity in multivariable Cox models performed separately in Hispanic/Latino, non-Hispanic white, Asian/Pacific Islander, and African American patients.

Lymphoma-specific survival was measured from the date of diagnosis to the date of death from lymphoma whereas overall survival considered death from all causes. Patients who died from causes other than lymphoma were censored at the time of death in the analysis of lymphoma-specific survival. Patients alive at the study end date (12/31/2016) were censored at this time or at the date of last known contact. Median follow-up time was calculated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method [39, 40].

For all regression analyses, the proportional hazard assumption was assessed using Schoenfeld residuals [41]. Variables, including the stage at diagnosis and modality of initial treatment, that violated the proportional hazard assumption were included as stratification variables. Survival analyses were done using SAS 9.4 and all statistical tests were two-sided; a P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. This study was approved by the University of California, Davis Institutional Review Board.

Results

We identified 35,808 patients between 2010 and 2016 with a first primary diagnosis of NHL who met our criteria. Baseline demographics are shown in Table 1. Overall, 44.2% of all NHL patients were exposed to pesticide in their census tract of residence. Pesticide exposure was higher in Hispanic/Latino (46.5%) and non-Hispanic white (45.6%) than Asian/Pacific Islander (37.2%) and African American (34.9%) patients with NHL. Almost half (46.8%, 45.8%, 45.4%, 44.4%, and 42.2%) of NHL patients with Burkitt lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, small lymphocytic lymphoma, DLBCL, and T/NK-cell neoplasms had pesticide exposure, respectively.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients, California, 2010–2016
Full size table

Forty-four percent of patients with both limited and advanced NHL stage had pesticide exposure. Forty percent of NHL patients in the highest SES quintile had pesticide exposure compared to 44.2% in the lowest SES quintile. Pesticide exposure was found among 67.4% of NHL patients in rural and 40.9% in urban MSSA. Glyphosate, organophosphorus, carbamate, phenoxyherbicide, and 2,4-dimethylamine salt exposure were observed in 34.1%, 26.0%, 10.6%, 14.0%, and 12.8% of patients, respectively.

Median follow-up time was 2.99 years (95% CI: 2.95–3.04) for all patients with a primary diagnosis of NHL. Using CalEnviroScreen 3.0 data, we demonstrated no association between total pesticide exposure and worse lymphoma-specific survival (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.92–1.02) or overall survival (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.93–1.02). In addition, pesticide exposure was not associated with worse lymphoma-specific and overall survival when stratified by NHL subtypes (Table 2) or race/ethnicity (data not shown in Tables).

Table 2 Association between pesticide exposure* (versus no exposure) and lymphoma-specific and overall survival among non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients overall and by histologic subtype
Full size table

With the integration of land-use surveys which allowed for analysis of the effects of specific pesticides, glyphosate, organophosphorus, carbamate, phenoxyherbicide and 2,4-dimethylamine salt exposure was not associated with worse lymphoma-specific or overall survival (lymphoma-specific survival: glyphosate HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.96–1.06, organophosphorus HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.92–1.02, carbamate HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.88–1.03, phenoxyherbicide: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.94–1.08, 2,4-dimethylamine salt HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.92–1.07; overall survival: glyphosate HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.96–1.07, organophosphorus HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.95–1.03, carbamate HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.90–1.03, phenoxyherbicide: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.97–1.09, 2,4-dimethylamine salt HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.96–1.08) (Figs. 1 and 2). When examined by race/ethnicity, no consistent association between varying levels of pesticide exposure and lymphoma-specific or overall survival was found. Furthermore, when examined by pesticide tertile levels, all hazard ratios showed no association between varying levels of pesticide exposure and lymphoma-specific survival or overall survival.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Association between varying levels of individual pesticide exposure* (versus no exposure) and lymphoma-specific survival among non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Association between varying levels of individual pesticide exposure* (versus no exposure) and overall survival among non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients

Full size image

When examined by NHL histology, most pesticide exposure was not associated with worse lymphoma-specific survival, with the exception of carbamate exposure in lymphoblastic lymphoma (HR: 3.87; 95% CI: 1.66–9.01) (Table 3). With further stratification of carbamate exposure into tertile levels among lymphoblastic lymphoma patients, mid (HR: 6.77; 95% CI: 2.20–20.80), but not low (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.18–10.57) or high (HR: 4.19; 95% CI: 0.96–18.26) tertile levels were associated with worse lymphoma-specific survival (Additional file 1: Table S1). In contrast, phenoxyherbicide and 2,4-dimethylamine salt exposure was associated with superior lymphoma-specific survival in mantle cell lymphoma with hazard ratios of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.50–0.92) and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.92–1.02), respectively. The effect persisted with further stratification of phenoxyherbicide and 2,4-dimethylamine salt exposure into tertile levels among mantle cell lymphoma patients with superior lymphoma-specific survival observed with low (HR 0.51; 95% CI: 0.31–0.85), but not mid (HR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.50–1.45) or high (HR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.48–1.24) phenoxyherbicide tertiles and low (HR 0.47; 95% CI: 0.27–0.82), but not mid (HR 1.05; 95% CI: 0.62–1.78) nor high (HR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.49–1.35) 2,4-dimethylamine salt tertiles.

Table 3 Association between individual pesticide exposurea (versus no exposure) and lymphoma-specific and overall survival among non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients, stratified by histologic subtype
Full size table

Pesticide exposure was not associated with worse overall survival in any of the NHL histologies examined. In contrast, phenoxyherbicide exposure was associated with superior overall survival in mantle cell lymphoma (HR 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57–0.95). With further stratification of phenoxyherbicide exposure in tertile levels among mantle cell lymphoma patients, low (HR 0.63; 95% CI: 0.43–0.94), but not mid (HR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.47–1.24) nor high tertiles (HR 0.86; 95% CI: 0.58–1.27) were also associated with superior overall survival.

Discussion

In this large population-based study, we observed pesticide exposure to be prevalent among patients diagnosed with NHL, with high pesticide exposure particularly observed in Hispanics/Latinos and non-Hispanic whites. Using multiple measures of agricultural pesticide exposure, we did not observe pesticide exposure to be consistently associated with worse lymphoma-specific or overall survival.

Our study observed pesticide exposure among 46.5% of Hispanics/Latinos and 45.6% of non-Hispanic white NHL patients. Given the racial/ethnic distribution of hired agricultural workers in the United States (57% Hispanic/Latino and 32% non-Hispanic white), we would expect Hispanics/Latinos to have the highest exposure level. However, our neighborhood-level pesticide exposure does not capture occupational exposures outside the neighborhood or exposure to non-agricultural pesticides within the neighborhood, limiting our ability to fully capture pesticide exposure levels. Indeed, our analysis showed no consistent associations between pesticide exposure and worse lymphoma-specific and overall survival among each race/ethnicity.

Our findings are supported by an analysis of 232 NHL patients from the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort which found no association between organochlorine pesticide concentrations in adipose tissue and survival [42]. In contrast, a French multicenter retrospective cohort study of 244 DLBCL patients treated with anthracycline-based immunochemotherapy and with complete occupational histories observed increased treatment failure and poorer event-free and overall survival with occupational pesticide exposure [19]. The survival disadvantage was especially notable in patients with agricultural occupations compared with other exposed patients. In addition, these outcome differences persisted even though patients without pesticide exposure were more likely to present with disseminated disease and patients with and without exposure had no differences in demographic characteristics, initial presentation, international prognostic index, and treatment protocol. Our differences in findings may relate to the type of study design or our inability to classify groups with high personal pesticide exposure; our study included an unselected population of nearly all lymphoma patients in California, whereas the French study included a much smaller sample of patients from 6 medical centers. Given potential associations between pesticide exposure and NHL prognosis, more detailed studies are warranted.

Pesticides exert their toxic effect through various mechanisms such as reactive oxidative damage, chromosomal damage, and alteration of DNA repair mechanisms. Cytogenetic analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes in 120 Serbian people exposed to pesticide demonstrated higher levels of chromosomal aberrations when compared to those without pesticide exposure [43]. Similarly, evaluation of bone marrow samples from commercial, family, and organic farmers showed higher levels of chromosomal abnormalities in commercial and family farmers compared to organic farmers [44]. In addition, low concentrations of an organophosphorus, malathion, although not associated with cell death, was shown to upregulate oncogenes, downregulate tumor suppressor genes and induce gene expression of human B and T lymphocytes and immunoglobulin production which are involved in the initiation, progression, and pathogenesis of cancer [45]. These results highlight the need for further correlative and molecular studies, including DNA damage signature analysis and RNA sequencing, to identify biomarkers associated with pesticide exposure.

There are limitations to our study. Studies pertaining to the effects of pesticide are investigated worldwide due to its widespread use; pesticide usage patterns likely vary with different locations and the relative importance of residential pesticide exposure is limited to areas with prevalent pesticide use. Our study also utilized census tract as a proxy for pesticide exposure because of a lack of more detailed patient-reported data, such as direct vs. indirect exposure to pesticide (e.g., occupational exposure vs. exposure via aerosol or food contamination), differences in routine activity among patients in the same census tract, or duration of patient residency in a specified census tract. These factors are important in understanding the association between pesticide exposure and NHL. Furthermore, although the PUR database is regarded as one of the most extensive worldwide, guidelines for pesticide use reporting according to the California Department of Pesticide Regulation may limit its utility, as it does not capture details of residential exposure, which accounts for up to 10% of overall pesticide exposure in the United States [5]. Another limitation includes our short follow-up time (~3 years) for lymphoma-specific and overall survival which may underestimate the potential association between pesticide exposure and NHL prognosis.

Strengths of this study include the large population-based cohort of 35,808 patients with NHL which allowed for a robust multivariate analysis of outcomes. In addition, this study used pesticide usage data available from state resources which is an objective measurement of pesticide usage. Lastly, this is one of the few studies that specifically investigate the association between pesticide exposure and NHL treatment outcomes and survival, as previous studies primarily focused on the association between pesticide exposure and NHL incidence.

Conclusions

In summary, pesticide exposure is common among patients with NHL, particularly among Hispanics/Latinos and non-Hispanic whites. Although we found no consistent associations between agricultural pesticide exposure at the neighborhood level and worse survival, additional investigations with more details of personal pesticide exposure and longer follow-up time are warranted based on potential associations between pesticide exposure and NHL prognosis.

Availability of data and materials

Available upon request.

Abbreviations

AIDS:

Acquired immune deficiency syndrome

AJCC:

American Joint Committee on Cancer

CCR:

California Cancer Registry

DLBCL:

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency virus

HR:

Hazard ratio

lbs:

Total pounds

MSSA:

Medical service study area

NHL:

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma

PUR:

Pesticide Use Reporting

SES:

Socioeconomic status

References

  1. SEER Cancer Stat Facts: Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. National Cancer Institute. Bethesda M. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/nhl.html. Accessed 8 Aug 2021. 

  2. Ekström-Smedby K. Epidemiology and etiology of non-Hodgkin lymphoma – a review. Acta Oncol. 2006;45(3):258–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C R: Pest Management: National Association of State Department of Agriculture Research Foundation; 2014.

  4. About Pesticides. https://www.epa.gov/pesticides. Accessed 9 Aug 2021. 

  5. Atwood DaP-J, C: Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage 2008-2012 Estimates. 2017.

  6. Alavanja MCR, Bonner MR. Occupational pesticide exposures and cancer risk: a review. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2012;15(4):238–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Merhi M, Raynal H, Cahuzac E, Vinson F, Cravedi JP, Gamet-Payrastre L. Occupational exposure to pesticides and risk of hematopoietic cancers: meta-analysis of case-control studies. Cancer Causes Control. 2007;18(10):1209–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sathiakumar N, Delzell E, Cole P. Mortality among workers at two triazine herbicide manufacturing plants. Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(2):143–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fritschi L, Benke G, Hughes AM, Kricker A, Turner J, Vajdic CM, et al. Occupational exposure to pesticides and risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162(9):849–57.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Waddell BL, Zahm SH, Baris D, Weisenburger DD, Holmes F, Burmeister LF, et al. Agricultural use of organophosphate pesticides and the risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among male farmers (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2001;12(6):509–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Leon ME, Schinasi LH, Lebailly P, Beane Freeman LE, Nordby KC, Ferro G, et al. Pesticide use and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoid malignancies in agricultural cohorts from France, Norway and the USA: a pooled analysis from the AGRICOH consortium. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48(5):1519–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McDuffie HH, Pahwa P, McLaughlin JR, Spinelli JJ, Fincham S, Dosman JA, et al. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and specific pesticide exposures in men: cross-Canada study of pesticides and health. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2001;10(11):1155–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cancer IAfRo: IARC Monographs Volume 112: evaluation of five organophosphate insecticides and herbicides. In. Edited by Organization WH; 2015.

  14. Ahmadi N, Mandegary A, Jamshidzadeh A, Mohammadi-Sardoo M, Mohammadi-Sardo M, Salari E, et al. Hematological abnormality, oxidative stress, and Genotoxicity induction in the greenhouse pesticide sprayers; investigating the role of NQO1 gene polymorphism. Toxics. 2018;6(1):13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Canales-Aguirre A, Padilla-Camberos E, Gómez-Pinedo U, Salado-Ponce H, Feria-Velasco A, De Celis R. Genotoxic effect of chronic exposure to DDT on lymphocytes, oral mucosa and breast cells of female rats. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8(2):540–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lioi MB, Scarfì MR, Santoro A, Barbieri R, Zeni O, Di Berardino D, et al. Genotoxicity and oxidative stress induced by pesticide exposure in bovine lymphocyte cultures in vitro. Mutat Res. 1998;403(1-2):13–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaur K, Kaur R. Occupational pesticide exposure, impaired DNA repair, and diseases. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2018;22(2):74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang J, Zhang J, Liu R, Gan J, Liu J, Liu W. Endocrine-disrupting effects of pesticides through interference with human glucocorticoid receptor. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50(1):435–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lamure S, Carles C, Aquereburu Q, Quittet P, Tchernonog E, Paul F, et al. Association of Occupational Pesticide Exposure with Immunochemotherapy Response and Survival among Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell lymphoma. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(4):e192093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tayour C, Ritz B, Langholz B, Mills PK, Wu A, Wilson JP, et al. A case-control study of breast cancer risk and ambient exposure to pesticides. Environ Epidemiol. 2019;3(5):e070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Park AS, Ritz B, Yu F, Cockburn M, Heck JE. Prenatal pesticide exposure and childhood leukemia - a California statewide case-control study. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020;226:113486.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morton LM, Turner JJ, Cerhan JR, Linet MS, Treseler PA, Clarke CA, et al. Proposed classification of lymphoid neoplasms for epidemiologic research from the pathology working Group of the International Lymphoma Epidemiology Consortium (InterLymph). Blood. 2007;110(2):695–708.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Guidelines for ICD-O-3 implementation. https://www.naaccr.org. Accessed 9 Aug 2021.

  24. Organization. WH. International classification of diseases for oncology, 3rd edition (ICD-O-3). Geneva: WHO; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  25. CalEnvioScreen 3.0. https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/calenviroscreen/report/ces3report.pdf#page=59. Accessed 9 Aug 2021.

  26. Eriksson M, Hardell L, Carlberg M, Akerman M. Pesticide exposure as risk factor for non-Hodgkin lymphoma including histopathological subgroup analysis. Int J Cancer. 2008;123(7):1657–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cocco P, Satta G, Dubois S, Pili C, Pilleri M, Zucca M, et al. Lymphoma risk and occupational exposure to pesticides: results of the Epilymph study. Occup Environ Med. 2013;70(2):91–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoar Zahm S, Weisenburger DD, Cantor KP, Holmes FF, Blair A. Role of the herbicide atrazine in the development of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1993;19(2):108–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Orsi L, Delabre L, Monnereau A, Delval P, Berthou C, Fenaux P, et al. Occupational exposure to pesticides and lymphoid neoplasms among men: results of a French case-control study. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66(5):291–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pahwa M, Harris SA, Hohenadel K, McLaughlin JR, Spinelli JJ, Pahwa P, et al. Pesticide use, immunologic conditions, and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Canadian men in six provinces. Int J Cancer. 2012;131(11):2650–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zheng T, Zahm SH, Cantor KP, Weisenburger DD, Zhang Y, Blair A. Agricultural exposure to Carbamate pesticides and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. J Occup Environ Med. 2001;43:641–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Woods JS, Polissar L, Severson RK, Heuser LS, Kulander BG. Soft tissue sarcoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in relation to phenoxyherbicide and chlorinated phenol exposure in western Washington. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1987;78(5):899–910.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cantor KP, Blair A, Everett G, Gibson R, Burmeister LF, Brown LM, et al. Pesticides and other agricultural risk factors for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among men in Iowa and Minnesota. Cancer Res. 1992;52(9):2447–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hoar SK, Blair A, Holmes FF, Boysen CD, Robel RJ, Hoover R, et al. Agricultural herbicide use and risk of lymphoma and soft-tissue sarcoma. Jama. 1986;256(9):1141–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mills PK, Yang R, Riordan D. Lymphohematopoietic cancers in the united farm Workers of America (UFW), 1988-2001. Cancer Causes Control. 2005;16(7):823–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Abrahão R, Cooley JJP, Maguire FB, Parikh-Patel A, Morris CR, Schwarz EB, et al. Stage at diagnosis and survival among adolescents and young adults with lymphomas following the affordable care act implementation in California. Int J Cancer. 2022;150(7):1113–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Maguire FB, Li Q, Morris CR, Parikh-Patel A, Rosenberg AS, Keegan THM. Treatment patterns and survival in older adults with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a population-based study. J Registry Manag. 2020;47(3):135–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kent EE, Morris RA, Largent JA, Ziogas A, Sender LS, Anton-Culver H. Socioeconomic impacts on survival differ by race/ethnicity among adolescents and young adults with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2010;2010:824691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Clark TG, Bradburn MJ, Love SB, Altman DG. Survival analysis part I: basic concepts and first analyses. Br J Cancer. 2003;89(2):232–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Schemper M, Smith TL. A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(4):343–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Schoenfeld D. Chi-squared goodness-of-fit tests for the proportional hazards regression model. Biometrika. 1980;67(1):145–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Roswall N, Sørensen M, Bräuner EV, Tjønneland A, Raaschou-Nielsen O. No association between Organochlorine concentrations in adipose tissue and survival after non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2018;27(2):224–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pajic J, Jovicic D, Milovanovic APS. Cytogenetic surveillance of persons occupationally exposed to genotoxic chemicals. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2018;73(5):313–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Costa MB, Farias IR, da Silva MC, Filho L, de Paula BD, de Oliveira RTG, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities and dysregulated DNA repair gene expression in farmers exposed to pesticides. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021;82:103564.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Anjitha R, Antony A, Shilpa O, Anupama KP, Mallikarjunaiah S, Gurushankara HP. Malathion induced cancer-linked gene expression in human lymphocytes. Environ Res. 2020;182:109131.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The collection of cancer incidence data used in this study was supported by the California Department of Public Health pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 103885; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) National Program of Cancer Registries, under cooperative agreement 5NU58DP006344; the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program under contract HHSN261201800032I awarded to the University of California, San Francisco, contract HHSN261201800015I awarded to the University of Southern California, and contract HHSN261201800009I awarded to the Public Health Institute. The ideas and opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the State of California, Department of Public Health, the National Cancer Institute, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or their Contractors and Subcontractors. Likewise, it should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS, or the U.S. Government.

Funding

This work was supported by the UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center (P30CA093373)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Christina Poh

  2. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA

    Christina Poh

  3. Division of Hematology/Oncology, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA

    John D. McPherson, Joseph Tuscano, Qian Li & Theresa Keegan

  4. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA

    John D. McPherson

  5. Veterans Administration, Northern California Healthcare System, Sacramento, CA, USA

    Joseph Tuscano

  6. California Cancer Reporting and Epidemiologic Surveillance Program, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA

    Arti Parikh-Patel

  7. Department of Environmental Toxicology and the Center for Health and the Environment, UC Davis, Davis, CA, USA

    Christoph F. A. Vogel

  8. Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Myles Cockburn

Authors
  1. Christina Poh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John D. McPherson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joseph Tuscano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qian Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Arti Parikh-Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Christoph F. A. Vogel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Myles Cockburn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Theresa Keegan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CP drafted the manuscript. TK developed the concept and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. QL analyzed the data. JDM, JT, AP, CFAV, and MC contributed to the design of the study. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Poh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not required for this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Association between individual pesticide exposure and lymphoma-specific and overall survival among non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients, stratified by histologic subtype and varying pesticide exposure levels.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poh, C., McPherson, J.D., Tuscano, J. et al. Environmental pesticide exposure and non-Hodgkin lymphoma survival: a population-based study. BMC Med 20, 165 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02348-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02348-7

Keywords

  • Pesticide
  • Lymphoma
  • Survival

BMC Medicine

ISSN: 1741-7015

Contact us