Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Multispectral fluorescence imaging of EGFR and PD-L1 for precision detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a preclinical and clinical study

BMC Medicine volume 22, Article number: 342 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Early detection and treatment are effective methods for the management of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), which can be facilitated by the detection of tumor-specific OSCC biomarkers. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are important therapeutic targets for OSCC. Multispectral fluorescence molecular imaging (FMI) can facilitate the detection of tumor multitarget expression with high sensitivity and safety. Hence, we developed Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 imaging probes, in combination with multispectral FMI, to sensitively and noninvasively identify EGFR and PD-L1 expression for the detection and comprehensive treatment of OSCC.

Methods

The expression of EGFR and PD-L1 was analyzed using bioinformatics data sources and specimens. Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 imaging probes were developed and tested on preclinical OSCC cell line and orthotopic OSCC mouse model, fresh OSCC patients’ biopsied samples, and further clinical mouthwash trials were conducted in OSCC patients.

Results

EGFR and PD-L1 were specifically expressed in human OSCC cell lines and tumor xenografts. Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 imaging probes can specifically target to the tumor sites in an in situ human OSCC mouse model with good safety. The detection sensitivity and specificity of Nimotuzumab-ICG in patients were 96.4% and 100%, and 95.2% and 88.9% for Atezolizumab-Cy5.5.

Conclusions

EGFR and PD-L1 are highly expressed in OSCC, the combination of which is important for a precise prognosis of OSCC. EGFR and PD-L1 expression can be sensitively detected using the newly synthesized multispectral fluorescence imaging probes Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5, which can facilitate the sensitive and specific detection of OSCC and improve treatment outcomes.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100045738. Registered 23 April 2021, https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=125220

Peer Review reports

Background

Oral malignancies account for 3–5% of all malignant tumors. Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a kind of oral malignant tumor with high malignant degree and poor prognosis. In 185 countries around the world, there are about 476,000 new cases of OSCC and about 226,000 deaths [1]. The overall mortality rate of oral and oropharyngeal cancers has increased by 0.5% per year over the past 10 years [2]. After comprehensive treatment, the 5-year survival rate remains at 50%, and the survival rate of patients with advanced disease decreases to 27% [3, 4]. The poor prognosis of patients with OSCC is partially due to a delayed diagnosis. Early screening and timely treatment can effectively prevent the progression of OSCC, thereby increasing the survival rate of patients [5, 6]. Currently, the diagnostic methods for OSCC mainly involve visual inspection and tactile examination of the oral cavity, head and neck lymph nodes, and traditional medical imaging such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [7]. However, some OSCCs appear similar to oral ulcers or underlying oral malignant diseases (OPMDs) [8, 9], leading to misdiagnosis. The gold standard for a definitive OSCC diagnosis is pathological examination, which is invasive, time-consuming, and involves complicated procedures [10,11,12]. Hence, there is an urgent need for new ways to detect tumors noninvasively and sensitively.

Near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging, through the injection or application of fluorescent imaging probes, allows tumors to be fluorescently lightened in the corresponding diseased areas, providing precise guidance for discriminating healthy and tumor tissues safely [13]. The most common NIR dyes used for in vivo NIRF tumor imaging are indocyanine green (ICG), Cy5, Cy5.5, Cy7 and IRDye800CW [14]. ICG is the amphiphilic small-molecule NIRF dye approved by the food and drug administration (FDA) for the surgical treatment of head and neck tumors [15]. ICG was first used for NIRF imaging in 9 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) [16]. Bredell et al. detected cervical sentinel lymph nodes in the soft tissue after peritumoral injection of ICG in patients with oropharyngeal cancer [17]. However, free ICG and other NIR dyes are non-specific and cannot be used for tumor-targeted imaging. NIR dyes can be coupled with tumor-specific ligands such as antibodies, metabolic substrates, cell surface peptides, and growth factors to recognize tumor cells [18,19,20,21]. In HNC, Cetuximab-800CW was evaluated by fluorescence-guided imaging (FGI) for high sensitivity to tumor detection [22, 23]. Multispectral fluorescence imaging (FMI) mainly uses broad-spectrum light and can simultaneously detect multiple biomarkers expressed in tumors. Chen et al. demonstrated the feasibility of detecting multiple targets in human for the first time in Barrett's neoplasia study. Multispectral FMI can facilitate precise and early detection of tumors [24]. Compared with target-FMI with a single tracer, multispectral FMI can improve the sensitivity and specificity of tumor identification [25]. For localized, small-scale tumors, the extracellular matrix (ECM) may prevent the penetration of intravenously administered macromolecules, leading to missed diagnoses of small lesions [26]. The use of micro-dose fluorescent imaging probes to spray or smear the diseased area enables almost instant imaging [27]. For OSCC, the entire oral mucosa can be topically applied with targeted imaging probes, and suspected cancer lesions can be directly lightened and correspondingly detected [28,29,30,31,32].

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are two key important therapeutic targets for OSCC. Targeted therapy, represented by EGFR antibody drugs, and immunotherapy, represented by anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies, have provided new strategies for the treatment of HNSCC. Cetuximab, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb), was the first FDA-approved molecular-targeted drug for the treatment of HNSCC [33] and has been approved as a first-line treatment for relapsed and/or metastatic HNSCC. Fluorescently labeled cetuximab can be utilized for targeted FMI of OSCC to evaluate the targeted recognition of anti-EGFR fluorescently labeled antibodies in and around the tumor after systemic administration [34]. de Wit JG et al. [23] reported that Cetuximab-800CW can be used for the detection of positive tumor margins through 66 OSCC tumors and can safely locate surgical margins during surgery. Nimotuzumab has a lower affinity than Cetuximab, and has less effect on the recognition and killing of normal tissue cells [35]. PD-L1 is a transmembrane receptor that, after binding to PD-L1/PD-L2, can prevent cellular immunity. PD-L1 antibody drugs can relieve this inhibition and enhance the cellular immune response against tumor cells by blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway [36]. The potential for imaging with Atezolizumab and its ability to predict responses to PD-L1 immunotherapy were initially assessed in a human study using zirconium-89-labeled Atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) [37]. Many cancers, including OSCC, are molecularly heterogeneous, and the detection of multiple targets is needed for more accurate clinical diagnosis and guidance for personalized therapy.

Hence, the aims of this study is to validate EGFR and PD-L1 as specific biomarkers for OSCC and develop multispectral Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 fluorescence imaging probes to quantify the dynamic expression of dual-target EGFR and PD-L1 from preclinical in vitro human OSCC cell lines, in vivo OSCC orthotopic mouse models, to clinical OSCC patient tumor specimens, and topical application as mouthwash in OSCC patients. The new imaging strategies, quick and sensitive detection methods, and experimental evidence for the sensitive detection of OSCC biomarkers provided in this study will help to provide guidance for the early detection of OSCC, targeted therapy and immunotherapy (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study flowchart

Full size image

Methods

Bioinformatics analysis

The data used to compare EGFR and PD-L1 expression in HNSCC and normal tissues are available in the gene expression profiling interactive analysis (GEPIA) database at http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn.

Clinical model prediction based on receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis

One hundred and twelve OSCC patients treated at the Chinese PLA General Hospital between December 2018 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The inclusion criteria were patients who underwent surgery for the first time at our hospital and were diagnosed with OSCC based on complete clinical and follow-up records. Exclusion criteria: (1) presence of other concomitant tumors; (2) presence of distant metastases; (3) history of preoperative antineoplastic therapy; (4) serious postoperative complications. The follow-up period was three years, and the patients were re-examined every three months. The time of recurrence, metastasis, or death was defined as the cutoff time. The follow-up period ended on December 1, 2022. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed based on EGFR and PD-L1 expression. EGFR and PD-L1 expression was evaluated by two independent pathologists in our hospital who were blinded to the study design. EGFR expression was detected using immunohistochemistry (IHC). The negative, weak positive, moderate positive, strong positive staining were respectively defined as —, + , +  + , +  +  + . PD-L1 expression was measured using PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx (Dako 22C3, Dako, Denmark) and ranged from 0 to 99% as determined using the Tumor Proportion Score (TPS).

EGFR and PD-L1 expression analysis via IHC of human OSCC

Analyses of EGFR and PD-L1 expression were conducted on biospecimens from the Department of Stomatology, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital. All biopsy specimens were diagnosed as OSCC by the Department of Pathology. The biospecimens were then embedded and sliced continuously. Tissue sections were incubated with bovine albumin (BSA, GC305010; Servicebio, Wuhan, China) for 30 min and Rabbit monoclonal antibody to EGFR (RRID: AB_869579; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and Rabbit monoclonal antibody to PD-L1 (RRID: AB_2687878; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at 4 °C overnight. The slides were then exposed to HRP peroxidase-labeled Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (RRID: AB_2811189; Servicebio, Wuhan, China) and incubated for 1 h. Subsequently, the sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for analysis. The expression levels of EGFR and PD-L1 were quantified using H-scores (0–300). Images were then captured using a scanner (Digital Sight DS-U3, Eclipse E100, Nikon, Japan), and H-scores were calculated by ImageJ Fiji (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).

Cell culture

Normal human oral keratinocytes (HOK) (ScienCell Research Laboratories Inc., USA) cells were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 (RPMI-1640) medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific Australia Pty Ltd., Australia) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Macgene Biotechnology, China). Human OSCC CAL27 cells (RRID: CVCL_1107; ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA), CAL27-Fluc cells (RRID: CVCL_1107; Cobioer Biosciences Co., Ltd., China) and HSC3 cells ((RRID: CVCL_1288; ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Thermo Fisher Scientific (CHINA) Co., Ltd., China) containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin–streptomycin. All cells were cultured in a Cell Culture Dish (Corning Inc., USA). All experiments were performed using mycoplasma-free cells. All human cell lines were authenticated using STR profiling within the last three years.

EGFR and PD-L1 expression analysis in different cells via western blotting and flow cytometry

HOK, CAL27, CAL27-Fluc and HSC3 cells were cultured and collected. Total protein was extracted from cells using precooled Pierce RIPA Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and Halt Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and western blotting was conducted utilizing Rabbit monoclonal antibody to EGFR (RRID: AB_869579) and PD-L1 monoclonal antibody (RRID: AB_2756526; Proteintech Group, Inc., USA), polyclonal rabbit β-actin antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, USA), and secondary antibody (1:10,000, Jackson ImmunoResearch, USA) were used for western blot. All four cell types (1 × 106) were incubated with FITC labeled Anti-EGFR antibody (RRID:AB_298005) and APC Anti-PD-L1 antibody (ab206967, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). After 30 min incubation, the cells were suspended in Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Ltd., China) and analyzed using flow cytometry (FACSCanto™ II; BD Biosciences, USA). FlowJo (version10.8.1) software was used for data analysis. The experiment was repeated three times, and the average of the results was taken.

Human OSCC orthotopic mouse model

All animal experiments were approved according to the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Permit No: IA21-2203–24) of the Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences. PBS (50 μL) containing 5 × 106 HSC3 or CAL27-Fluc cells were injected into the tongues of 6-week-old male BALB/c-nu/nu mice anesthetized with isoflurane (RWD Life Science, China). The feeding method is to give soft food or softened food with feed water. HSC3 and CAL27-Fluc tumor xenografts were harvested 7–10 days after inoculation; H&E staining was performed. Primary anti-EGFR antibody (RRID: AB_869579) and anti-PD-L1 antibody (RRID: AB_2687878) were used for immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence staining to analyze the expression of EGFR and PD-L1 in human OSCC tumor xenograft mouse models.

Synthesis of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5

ICG-NHS-ester (330 nM, dissolved in 300 μL DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich) was added to humanized monoclonal EGFR antibody (5 mg, 33 nM, Nimotuzumab, Biotech Pharma, China) (dye/antibody ratio was 1:20) in conjugation buffer (5 mL, 0.1 M PBS), and the solution was reacted in the dark at 25 °C with continuous oscillation overnight. The mixture was concentrated to 0.8 mL using a centrifugal filter unit (3 kDa MWCO, Amicon) and purified three times via centrifugation at 8,500 rpm for 15 min. Similarly, Cy5.5-NHS-ester (330 nM, dissolved in 300 μL 0.1 M PBS, New Research Bioscience, China) was added to humanized monoclonal anti-PD-L1 antibody (Atezolizumab, Roche Registration GmbH, Switzerland) in conjugation buffer (5 mL, 0.1 M PBS), and the solution was reacted in the dark at 25 °C with continuous oscillation overnight. The mixture was concentrated and purified thrice using a centrifugal filter unit (3 kDa MWCO, Amicon). The conjugation efficiency was calculated.

In vitro cell viability experiments and spectroscopic analysis

Logarithmic growth-phase HOK, CAL27-Fluc, and HSC3 cells were seeded (5 × 103/well) in 96-well culture plates (Corning Inc., USA) overnight. Nimotuzumab-ICG, Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 and the mixture were added into the culture plates at different concentrations (2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160, and 320 μg/mL), respectively. After 24 h incubation, cells were washed thrice with PBS and cultured in 10% CCK-8 medium (CA1210; Solarbio Science and Technology Co., Ltd., China) for 30 min; the absorbance at 450 nm was determined using a spectrophotometric microplate reader (Synergy HT; BioTek, USA).

The spectra of excitation light and absorption light of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 were tested by fluorescence spectrophotometer (F-7000, Hitachi, Japan) (The scanning speed is 1200 nm/min, the spectral bandwidth is 10 nm, and the sampling interval is 0.2 nm) and near-infrared spectrophotometer (UV-3600 Plus, Shimadzu, Japan), respectively.

In Vivo and Ex vivo fluorescence molecular imaging (FMI) and safety evaluation

CAL27-Fluc OSCC tumor-bearing mice were injected with Nimotuzumab-ICG (0.2 mg) and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 (0.2 mg), and their mixture via the caudal vein. The block group (normal mice) was intraperitoneally injected with Nimotuzumab (0.2 mg) and Atezolizumab (0.2 mg) 1 h before the intravenous injection of the imaging probes. FMI images were captured at different time points (pre-, 2, 6, 12, and 48 h) using an IVIS® Spectrum/CT (Caliper Life Sciences, USA), and the tumor to background ratio (TBR) was calculated using the region of interest (ROI) measurement tool with Fiji software.

After 24 h, the mice were sacrificed, and the serum were collected for detection of liver function indices, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) using an automatic blood biochemical auto analyzer (7600; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The tongues, hearts, livers, spleens and kidneys were collected for ex vivo FMI by IVIS® SpectrumCT. H&E staining was performed on organs after ex vivo imaging. Resected fresh CAL27-Fluc tumor-bearing mouse tongue tumor specimens were analyzed using immunofluorescence (IF) staining for EGFR and PD-L1 expression.

Probe fluorescence imaging of fresh human specimens

First, 10 fresh OSCC specimens were pre-tested to determine the optimal incubation concentration of the probe, and then a formal fluorescence imaging experiment on 20 OSCC specimens was followed.. A total of 30 resected fresh human OSCC specimens were rinsed in 5% goat serum (SL038, Solarbio Science and Technology Co., Ltd., China) to remove debris and mixed and incubated with Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 at 20 °C for 3 min. Subsequently, the specimens were washed with PBS 3 times. A homemade multispectral fluorescence imaging system (Key Lab of Molecular Imaging, CAS) was used to perform imaging experiments on the specimens. The device can achieve optical resolution of 50 μm, bandwidth of 5 nm, imaging field of 12.5 × 12.5 cm2, 50 fps time resolution (adjustable according to actual conditions), real-time imaging of white light image, near-infrared dual imaging channels of 665 nm and 785 nm simultaneously. After imaging experiments, the specimens were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (P1110; Macgene Biotechnology) for subsequent H&E, EGFR, and PD-L1 IHC and IF staining.

Fluorescence imaging of OSCC in human patients

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chinese PLA General Hospital (No. S2021-097–01) and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration Number: ChiCTR2100045738). All human patients signed informed consent, and the patients gargled 5 mL of Nimotuzumab-ICG (0.4 mg/mL) and Atezolizumab-ICG (0.4 mg/mL) for approximately 30 s. Next, the patients gargled ultrapure water for 30 s three times, and the interval between Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-ICG imaging was 1 h. White-light and fluorescence images were obtained using a commercialized Digital Precision Medicine imaging device H2800 (DPM, Beijing, China). After surgical treatment, fresh specimens were obtained for the probe-spraying experiment, H&E staining, EGFR, PD-L1 IHC staining, and IF staining. EGFR and PD-L1 expression were defined as —, + , +  + , +  +  + for negative, weak positive, medium positive, and strong positive expression.

Statistical analysis

The optimal cutoff values for the expression of EGFR and PD-L1 were determined from the ROC curves. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 21.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and GraphPad Prism software (version 9; GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Differences between paired data were tested using the Wilcoxon test. Statistical significance was set as *P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001.

Results

Validation of EGFR and PD-L1 as specific OSCC biomarkers

According to the GEPIA dataset, the expression levels of EGFR and PD-L1 were significantly higher in HNSCC tumors than para tumor tissues (Fig. 2A). The EGFR and PD-L1 gene expression profiles across all HNSCC tumor samples (n = 519) and paired normal tissues (n = 44) were expressed as log2[transcripts per million (TPM) + 1]]. Patients with OSCC had high EGFR and PD-L1 expression. The expression of EGFR and PD-L1 is associated with the prognosis of patients with HNSCC. The correlation between EGFR expression and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in 493 patients with HNSCC, and PD-L1 expression, DFS, and OS in 466 patients with HNSCC were analyzed using the GEPIA dataset. EGFR overexpression was significantly associated with OS (*P = 0.045), whereas high expression of PD-L1 was associated with shorter DFS (*P = 0.01) (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Expression and analysis of EGFR and PD-L1 in HNSCC in GEPIA database and OSCC patients. A Statistical analysis of EGFR and PD-L1 expression in HNSCC tumors and normal tissues obtained from the GEPIA database. Log2(TPM + 1) was used for the log-scale. HNSCC, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas. B The correlation of EGFR and PD-L1 expression related to disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). C Receiver operating characteristic analysis of EGFR and PD-L1. FPR, False Positive Rate; TPR, True Positive Rate; AUC, Area Under Curve. D Representative EGFR and PD-L1 IHC and H&E histology obtained from OSCC biospecimens. Scale bar of overview, 2 mm. Scale bar of tumor and para tumor, 100 μm. (E) IHC H-scores of EGFR and PD-L1 expression in IHC samples (n = 59 patients). **** p < 0.0001

Full size image

The statistical data for OSCC patients (n = 112) are shown in Supplementary Table 1. The areas under the curve corresponding to high expression of EGFR and PD-L1 were 0.791 and 0.641, respectively, but the corresponding curve area for the combined prediction is 0.836 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.744 to 0.928), suggesting that the combination of EGFR and PD-L1 dual-targets is important for the precise prognosis of OSCC (Fig. 2C).

To confirm that EGFR and PD-L1 are specific biomarkers for OSCC, biospecimen slides from patients with OSCC (n = 59) were immunohistochemically stained with anti-EGFR and anti-PD-L1 antibodies. The demographics of patients with OSCC (n = 59) are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1. EGFR and PD-L1 expression levels were distinctly higher in OSCC tumors than in para tumor tissues (Fig. 2D). We clearly distinguished tumor tissues from normal tissues by immunohistochemical staining for EGFR and PD-L1. The EGFR H-Score and PD-L1 H-Score in OSCC and para tumor tissues were 141.2 vs. 67.19 and 116.2 vs. 69.66, respectively (**** P < 0.0001) (Fig. 2E).

Detection of EGFR and PD-L1 expression in in vitro OSCC cells and in vivo orthotopic OSCC tumor model

The expression of EGFR and PD-L1 was relatively higher in CAL27, CAL27-Fluc, and HSC3 cells than in HOK cells, used as control (Fig. 3A). EGFR and PD-L1 protein expression was significantly higher in CAL27 (~ 4.75-fold, **** P < 0.0001, ~ 1.19-fold, * P < 0.05), CAL27-Fluc (~ 2.36-fold, *** P < 0.001, ~ 1.85-fold, **** P < 0.0001), and HSC3 (~ 2.65-fold, **** P < 0.0001, ~ 2.34-fold, **** P < 0.0001) cells than in HOK cells (Fig. 3B). IHC staining showed that EGFR and PD-L1 were both highly expressed in the tumor area in both CAL27-Fluc and HSC3 mouse models (Fig. 3C). EGFR and PD-L1 double IF staining also confirmed their high expression in the CAL27-Fluc mouse tumor xenografts (Fig. 3D). In general, our experiments confirmed that EGFR and PD-L1 were expressed at relatively higher levels in OSCC tumor tissues than in normal tissues.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Detection of EGFR and PD-L1 Expression in in vitro OSCC cells and in vivo orthotopic OSCC tumor model. A FACS analysis of HOK, CAL27, CAL27-fLUC, and HSC3 cells for detection of EGFR and PD-L1 expression. B Western blotting analysis of EGFR and PD-L1 expression in HOK, CAL27, CAL27-fLUC, and HSC3 cell lines. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. C H&E, EGFR and PD-L1 IHC staining of OSCC tumor xenograft. Scale bar, 200 μm. D White light, H&E, immunofluorescence staining (IF) obtained from CAL27-fLUC tumor xenografts. H&E Scale bar, 1,000 μm. Both PD-L1 and EGFR are over-expressed in the cell membrane and stained in green and red, respectively; the nucleus is stained in blue. Scale bar, 500 and 20 μm

Full size image

Characterization of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 imaging probes

Nimotuzumab and Atezolizumab were reacted with ICG-NHS and Cy5.5-NHS to yield Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5, respectively (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). The conjugation efficiency was 93.42% and 92.02%, respectively. Nimotuzumab-ICG had an excitation wavelength of 808 nm and absorption peak at 790 nm, which were partially offset from those of free ICG (Excitation: 815 nm), indicating that the dye was conjugated to Nimotuzumab. The spectral characterization of Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 also showed a shift from the excitation wavelength of free Cy5.5 (Excitation: 691 nm), indicating that the dye was linked to Atezolizumab, with excitation and absorption peak of Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 were 670 nm and 679 nm, respectively (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). The cell viability of different human OSCC cells was not influenced when the concentrations of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5, were lower than 320 μg/mL. These results suggest that Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 were relatively biocompatible and safe for further in vivo study (Additional file 1: Fig. S3).The in vivo toxicity of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 was evaluated in healthy male BALB/c-nu/nu mice; The mice were euthanized 24 h post-injection of PBS, Nimotuzumab-ICG, Atezolizumab-Cy5.5, and Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 injection (4 mg/kg). Serum assessment showed that the ALT and AST levels were within the normal range in all four groups (Additional file 1: Fig. S4). In addition, no obvious histopathological changes were observed in the major organs (heart, liver, kidney, or spleen) (Additional File 1: Fig. S5). Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 were further tested for in vivo transoral toxicity and proved to be safe (Additional file 1: Table S2). These results demonstrated that Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 were well-developed and safe.

The in vivo biodistribution and tumor targeting of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5

An orthotopic human CAL27-Fluc OSCC tumor mouse model was established and bioluminescence imaging (BLI) was performed to locate the OSCC tumor xenograft (Additional file 1: Fig. S6). CAL27-Fluc oral tumor-bearing mice were divided into different groups: Nimotuzumab-ICG, Atezolizumab-Cy5.5, Nimotuzumab-ICG + Atezolizumab-Cy5.5, and corresponding blocking groups. The fluorescence signals of ICG and Cy5.5 were detected at 785 nm and 665 nm, respectively (Fig. 4A). The fluorescence signal in the Nimotuzumab-ICG group was detected at 2 h post-injection, peaked at 12 h post-injection, gradually decreased, and remained detected 48 h post-injection. The fluorescence signal of the Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 group was detected at 2 h post-injection and peaked at 12 h post-injection. After the simultaneous injection of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5, both fluorescence signals were detected at 2 h and peaked at 12 h post-injection. The FMI TBR of the target group was higher than that of the corresponding block group at the corresponding time points. The difference in the TBR was more significant at 12 h than other time points. (Fig. 4B). After 48 h of in vivo observation, the tumors and major organs were dissected for ex vivo FMI. The fluorescence signal of the tumor region in the targeted group was higher than that in the blocking group. The fluorescence signals of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 were stronger in the liver and certain signals in the kidney, indicating that the imaging probes were mainly metabolized through the liver and some through kidney. Animal study suggested that Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 dual-targeting imaging probes possessed good OSCC tumor-targeting capability and safety, making them suitable for further clinical application and translation.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Biodistribution of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 in an orthotopic OSCC mouse model. A In vivo FMI of an OSCC orthotopic mouse model injected with Nimotuzumab-ICG, Atezolizumab-Cy5.5, or a combination of both, respectively. The blocking group represents the pre-administration of corresponding antibody drugs Ex vivo FMI of the tongue with OSCC tumor and major organs 48 h post-injection. B TBR analysis of in vivo FMI signal intensity in different groups at different time points. The TBR was significantly different at 12 h postinjection. FMI, fluorescence molecular imaging; TBR, tumor to background ratio. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01

Full size image

Identification of EGFR and PD-L1 expression on OSCC patients’ fresh biopsied samples using Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 imaging probes

For the identification of multitarget expression, a homemade multispectral fluorescence imaging system was developed and used to conduct imaging experiments on patient specimens, and white light and multispectral fluorescence images were obtained. Figure 5A shows the working model diagram and prototype of the multispectral fluorescence imaging system. Fresh OSCC specimens from 10 patients were topically treated with Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 with different concentrations. The optimal incubation concentration of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 was found to be 0.4 mg/mL (Additional file 1: Fig. S7) for 3 min (Additional file 1: Fig. S8). The obvious fluorescence signals of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 from the OSCC tumor region could be specifically detected, while adjacent normal areas did not show fluorescence signals (Fig. 5B). Quantitative analysis showed that Nimotuzumab-ICG imaging discriminated between tumor and para tumor. Under 785 nm NIR, the TBR of the tumor was higher than para tumor (30.05 ± 1.87 vs 20.27 ± 2.35, ** P < 0.01). In addition, under 665 nm + 785 nm NIR, the TBR of tumors was higher than that of para tumor (27.59 ± 1.33 vs 16.81 ± 1.39, *** P < 0.001). Similarly, Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 could clearly distinguish tumors from parathyroid tumors. Under 665 nm NIR and 665 nm + 785 nm NIR, the TBR of tumor and para tumor were (23.18 ± 2.52 vs 14.07 ± 1.51, ** P < 0.01) and (20.15 ± 1.55 vs 11.32 ± 1.02, ** P < 0.01), respectively. This observation was further confirmed by H&E, EGFR, and PD-L1 immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence staining of patient’s specimens. The expression levels of EGFR and PD-L1 in OSCC tumor tissues were also observed based on the fluorescence intensity produced by excitation light irradiation at 665 nm and 785 nm. The higher the fluorescence intensity, the higher were the biomarker expression levels (Fig. 5C). Therefore, we further performed multiplexed fluorescence imaging of EGFR and PD-L1 in 30 fresh OSCC patients’ specimens. FMI results, immunohistochemical staining, and immunofluorescence staining showed that the sensitivity and specificity of Nimotuzumab-ICG were 96.4% (95%CI: 79.8% ~ 99.8%) (27/28) and 100% (95%CI: 19.8% ~ 100%) (2/2), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 were 95.2% (95%CI: 74.1% ~ 99.7%) (20/21) and 88.9% (95%CI: 50.7% ~ 99.4%) (8/9), respectively. The high imaging sensitivity and specificity of the imaging probes with high safety indicate the feasibility of topical application in human patients with OSCC in situ.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 imaging probes were used to detect fresh OSCC biopsy samples. A The working model diagram and prototype of the home-made multispectral fluorescence imaging system. B Representative NIR and NIR overlay image of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 staining of fresh OSCC biospecimen from patients. Orange and white arrows correspond to the position and orientation of the cross-sectional fluorescence intensity profiles of the NIR and NIR overlay regions, respectively. Quantitative analysis showed that the fluorescence intensity in the tumor area and the para tumor area. NIR, Near-infrared. C White light, H&E, EGFR IHC, PD-L1 IHC, and IF staining of fresh biospecimen from OSCC patients. Scale bar, 1,000 μm and 100 μm

Full size image

Fluorescence imaging of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-ICG in OSCC patients in situ

Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-ICG were topically applied as mouthwashes to 8 OSCC patients with OSCC. The fluorescence imaging of EGFR and PD-L1 dual targets was mainly performed using the Digital Precision Medicine imaging device H2800 (DPM, Beijing, China), which possesses an endoscopic detector that can be applied to patients’ mouths. Quantitative analysis after gargling with Nimotuzumab-ICG (0.4 mg/ml) showed that EGFR expression was specifically highly expressed in tumor tissues but not in normal mucosa tissues (Fig. 6A, top, 23.9 ± 1.17 vs 3.01 ± 0.24, **** P < 0.0001). After surgical treatment, tissue specimens were subjected to ex vivo fluorescence imaging, H&E staining, and immunohistochemical staining. Quantitative analysis showed that the TBR in the tumor was higher than that in the para tumor (Fig. 6A, bottom, 48.02 ± 4.65 vs 19.27 ± 1.973, *** P < 0.001). Similarly, after gargling with Atezolizumab-ICG (0.4 mg/ml), quantitative analysis showed that the TBR in the tumor was higher than that in the para tumor in both in situ and ex vivo experiments. The TBR of the tumor and para tumor were 23.4 ± 2.19 vs 5.34 ± 0.61, (*** P < 0.001) and 27.47 ± 2.43 vs 17.06 ± 1.52 (** P < 0.01), respectively (Fig. 6B). The fluorescence imaging data of 8 cases of OSCC are summarized in Additional file 1: Table S3. The ex vivo FMI, HE, and IHC data were almost consistent with in vivo FMI observations, showing that specific tumor areas can be fluorescently illuminated by the targeted imaging probes.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Fluorescence imaging of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-ICG in OSCC human patients. A White light, NIR, and NIR overlay images were obtained by oral gargling experiment of Nimotuzumab-ICG on OSCC patients in clinical application. A dotted white line was drawn from tumor area to para tumor tissue to calculate the counts of fluoresce signal. The expression of EGFR was further imaged with Nimotuzumab-ICG in fresh biopsied specimens of OSCC patients, and verified using IHC and H&E staining. Scale bar, 2000 μm. B White light, NIR, and NIR overlay images were obtained by oral gargling experiment of Atezolizumab-ICG on OSCC patients for clinical application. The expression of PD-L1 was imaged with Atezolizumab-ICG in fresh biopsied specimens of OSCC patients, and verified using IHC. Scale bar, 2000 μm. C Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-ICG were used in the oral gargling experiment, and white light, NIR, and overlayed NIR images of both the left (with OSCC area) and right (with lichen planus) buccal mucosa were obtained. The fluorescence intensity was measured, calculated, and verified via pathology. D H&E, EGFR IHC, PD-L1 IHC, and IF staining were performed on fresh OSCC specimens on the patient's left buccal mucosa. The yellow line indicated the gross tumor range in fresh surgical specimens. The black line shows the tumor areas in H&E staining and IHC staining, while the white line shows the tumor areas in IF staining. Scale bar, 2,000 μm

Full size image

Interestingly, a patient had buccal mucosal SCC on the left side and buccal mucosal lichen planus on the right side of the mouth. After gargling with Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-ICG imaging probes, fluorescence signal was observed in the left buccal mucosa, whereas no trace of fluorescence signal was observed in the right buccal mucosa (Fig. 6C). The data validated the specificity of the Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-ICG probes for the detection of OSCC. These in vivo observations were further verified via subsequent IHC and IF experiments (Fig. 6D).

Discussion

Sensitive detection of tumor-specific biomarkers can facilitate the early and accurate detection of OSCC and provide guidance for precision therapy. At present, a number of studies have demonstrated the feasibility of OSCC fluorescence guided localization and guidance of surgical margin resection. Early diagnosis of OSCC was achieved through oral spray fluorescence recognition imaging [29, 30]. EGFR and PD-L1 are key targets in OSCC. Herein, we developed Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 imaging probes combined with multispectral FMI to facilitate the noninvasive detection of EGFR and PD-L1 with high sensitivity, specificity and safety. We further translated our dual-target imaging strategy from preclinical OSCC bearing animal studies to clinical patients with OSCC, which showed great potential for the comprehensive management of OSCC for early detection and image-guided therapy, including targeted therapy, surgery, and immunotherapy.

EGFR and PD-L1 are important therapeutic targets in OSCC. EGFR, a transmembrane glycoprotein, is highly expressed in 90% of HNSCC cases and is a strong prognostic indicator of head and neck cancer [38, 39]. Maurizi et al. found that EGFR levels are associated with the risk of recurrence and death [40]. PD-L1 is also highly expressed on the surface of HNSCC [41]. The expression of PD-L1 in various solid tumors, such as esophageal, gastric, and thyroid cancers, is associated with poor prognosis [42, 43]. Bioinformatics analysis from GEPIA Datasets and immunohistochemical staining of 59 human OSCC biological specimens from the Chinese PLA General Hospital showed that EGFR and PD-L1 were highly expressed in OSCC. The dataset obtained based on GEPIA also verified that high EGFR expression in HNSCC was correlated with OS. Overexpression of PD-L1 in HNSCC is associated with DFS, not OS, which is consistent with previous findings [44]. However, whether the expression of EGFR or PD-L1 in HNSCC is correlated with OS or DFS may be subjected to differences due to the sample numbers and follow-up time. Based on a 3-year retrospective analysis of 112 patients with OSCC treated at the Chinese PLA General Hospital, a ROC curve was used to predict the clinical model. The combination analysis of EGFR and PD-L1 expression in predicting the 3-year OS of patients with OSCC can improve the prediction accuracy. Therefore, both EGFR and PD-L1 can not only be used as prognostic markers for OSCC but also as potential markers for guiding antitumor therapy.

Multiplexed FMI technology provides good opportunities for noninvasive and multitarget detection with high sensitivity and safety. A variety of malignant tumors, including OSCC, have tumor molecular heterogeneity [45], The multispectral fluorescence probes make up for the situation that the imaging of a single mode or the recognition of a single target makes the ability of tumor characterization and boundary analysis relatively challenging. And multispectral is more powerful than single spectrum in defining tumor heterogenous properties and boundary analysis [24]. And thus the detection of multitargets is most likely to improve both the sensitivity and specificity of tumor recognition and for accurate clinical diagnosis and guidance of treatment. The fluorescence-labeled anti-EGFR antibody Cetuximab-IRDye800CW has been used to locate tumors and surrounding tissues in advanced HNSCC [34]. Intravenous injection of Cetuximab-IRDye800 in patients with HNSCC achieved high sensitivity and specificity and successfully distinguished tumors from normal tissues in FMI-guided surgical studies [46, 47]. As a humanized monoclonal antibody, Nimotuzumab has a high affinity and can bind to the extracellular domain of EGFR and inhibit EGF binding [48] Nimotuzumab has been approved in several countries for the treatment of HNSCC [49] and glioma [50] based on clinical trials of various malignancies [51]. Nimotuzumab has the advantage of low toxicity compared with Cetuximab [35]. Therefore, in this study, we developed a novel EGFR targeting Nimotuzumab-ICG fluorescence imaging probe. In OSCC tumor tissues with high EGFR expression, Nimotuzumab-ICG showed a higher fluorescence imaging signal and better image contrast than images of tumors with low or no EGFR expression. Moreover, we developed an Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 fluorescence imaging probe targeting the PD-L1 molecule, which can realize noninvasive and dynamic imaging of PD-L1 expression and provide guidance for safe immunotherapy. Targeted molecular imaging of PD-L1 is an effective method for dynamic and noninvasive evaluation of PD-L1 expression; however, the main administration method is the intravenous route [37, 52,53,54]. In this study, we administered imaging probes through topically administration [27,28,29,30,31,32], which can achieve almost instant imaging of EGFR and PD-L1 by spraying the target area with micro-doses of fluorescent imaging probes and detecting suspected cancer lesions. Multispectral FMI imaging of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 is a new non-invasive, sensitive and specific way to identify tumors. Ultimately, we will be able to offer more precise and personalized treatments.

To further promote clinical translation, we applied our imaging probes as mouthwashes to 8 OSCC patients. Since the homemade multispectral fluorescence imaging system is still in the prototype stage, it cannot be used in the surgery room. Hence, we utilized the commercialized Digital Precision Medicine imaging device H2800, though this system has only one channel for detecting ICG fluorescence signal. Hence, we developed Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-ICG imaging probes and applied them consecutively to OSCC patients through a mouthwash. Our imaging method is quick sensitive and specific in detecting EGFR and PD-L1 expression in patients with OSCC, which was further validated by post-surgical histology and immunohistochemistry. Moreover, our imaging strategy can discriminate tumor lesions from other oral diseases, such as buccal mucosa lichen planus. For the future clinical application of homemade multispectral fluorescence imaging system can not only provide early identification and diagnosis of OSCC, but also provide guidance for clinical surgical boundary recognition and anti-tumor targeted therapy and immunotherapy. In addition, it is still necessary to further optimize the imaging algorithm and autofocus algorithm, eliminate the image distortion caused by oral haze, and continuously improve the image recognition ability.

Conclusions

We developed a multispectral FMI imaging strategy that demonstrated the feasibility of concurrently detecting multiple tumor biomarkers and the potential for the early detection of tumors that are molecularly heterogeneous. We synthesized the multispectral fluorescence imaging probes Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 with OSCC targeted imaging performance and good biosafety. Make up for the situation that the imaging method of a single mode or the recognition of a single target makes the ability of tumor characterization and boundary analysis relatively Challenging. Combined with the homemade multispectral fluorescence imaging system, the EGFR and PD-L1 expression can be identified and quantified from preclinical OSCC tumor-bearing mouse models to clinical OSCC patients, which facilitates early cancer detection and provide guidance for anti-tumor targeted therapy, image-guided surgery, and immunotherapy of OSCC. We demonstrated a proof-of-concept for detecting multiple targets concurrently in patients with OSCC neoplasia, which is promising for a wide range of clinical applications, including early screening and surveillance, biopsy guidance, quick staining of fresh biopsies, in vivo diagnosis, and intraoperative margin delineation.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during our study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

OSCC:

Oral squamous cell carcinoma

EGFR:

Epidermal growth factor receptor

PD-L1:

Programmed death-ligand 1

FMI:

Fluorescence molecular imaging

CT:

Computed Tomography

MRI:

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

NIRF:

Near-infrared fluorescence

ICG:

Indocyanine green

HNSCC:

Head and Neck squamous cell carcinoma

ROC:

Receiver operator characteristic

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

H&E:

Hematoxylin and eosin

ROI:

Region of interest

TBR:

Tumor to background ratio

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:7–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gyawali B, Shimokata T, Honda K, Ando Y. Chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;44:10–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sadreddini S, Baradaran B, Aghebati-Maleki A, Sadreddini S, Shanehbandi D, Fotouhi A, et al. Immune checkpoint blockade opens a new way to cancer immunotherapy. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:8541–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Madhura MG, Rao RS, Patil S, Fageeh HN, Alhazmi A, Awan KH. Advanced diagnostic aids for oral cancer. Dis Mon. 2020;66: 101034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Silverman S Jr, Kerr AR, Epstein JB. Oral and pharyngeal cancer control and early detection. J Cancer Educ. 2010;25:279–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhatia N, Lalla Y, Vu AN, Farah CS. Advances in optical adjunctive AIDs for visualisation and detection of oral malignant and potentially malignant lesions. Int J Dent. 2013;2013:194029.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Glen P, Botha E. Early detection and prevention of head and neck cancers. Br Dent J. 2022;233:726–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Y, Zhang X, Wang S, Li Z, Hu X, Yang X, et al. Identification of metabolism-associated biomarkers for early and precise diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Biomolecules. 2022;12:400.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Steigen SE, Søland TM, Nginamau ES, Laurvik H, Costea DE, Johannessen AC, et al. Grading of oral squamous cell carcinomas-Intra and interrater agreeability: Simpler is better? J Oral Pathol Med. 2020;49:630–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wick MR. The hematoxylin and eosin stain in anatomic pathology-An often-neglected focus of quality assurance in the laboratory. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2019;36:303–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lajolo C, Gioco G, Rupe C, Patini R, Rizzo I, Romeo U, et al. Patient perception after oral biopsies: an observational outpatient study. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25:5687–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Keereweer S, Kerrebijn JD, van Driel PB, Xie B, Kaijzel EL, Snoeks TJ, et al. Optical image-guided surgery–where do we stand? Mol Imaging Biol. 2011;13:199–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Koller M, Qiu SQ, Linssen MD, Jansen L, Kelder W, de Vries J, et al. Implementation and benchmarking of a novel analytical framework to clinically evaluate tumor-specific fluorescent tracers. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):3739.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Nagaya T, Nakamura YA, Choyke PL, Kobayashi H. Fluorescence-Guided Surgery. Front. Oncol. 2017;7:314.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yokoyama J, Fujimaki M, Ohba S, Anzai T, Yoshii R, Ito S, et al. A feasibility study of NIR fluorescent image-guided surgery in head and neck cancer based on the assessment of optimum surgical time as revealed through dynamic imaging. Onco Targets Ther. 2013;6:325–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bredell MG. Sentinel lymph node mapping by indocyanin green fluorescence imaging in oropharyngeal cancer - preliminary experience. Head Neck Oncol. 2010;2:31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu M, Rettig MP, Sudlow G, Wang B, Akers WJ, Cao D, et al. Preclinical evaluation of Mab CC188 for ovarian cancer imaging. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:1351–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Andreev OA, Dupuy AD, Segala M, Sandugu S, Serra DA, Chichester CO, et al. Mechanism and uses of a membrane peptide that targets tumors and other acidic tissues in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:7893–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang JA, Kong WH, Sung DK, Kim H, Kim TH, Lee KC, et al. Hyaluronic acid-tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand conjugate for targeted treatment of liver fibrosis. Acta Biomater. 2015;12:174–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Keereweer S, Mol IM, Kerrebijn JD, Van Driel PB, Xie B, de BaatenburgJong RJ, et al. Targeting integrins and enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect for optical imaging of oral cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2012;105:714–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Voskuil FJ, de Jongh SJ, Hooghiemstra WTR, Linssen MD, Steinkamp PJ, de Visscher SAHJ, et al. Fluorescence-guided imaging for resection margin evaluation in head and neck cancer patients using cetuximab-800CW: a quantitative dose-escalation study. Theranostics. 2020;10(9):3994–4005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. de Wit JG, Vonk J, Voskuil FJ, de Visscher SAHJ, Schepman KP, Hooghiemstra WTR, et al. EGFR-targeted fluorescence molecular imaging for intraoperative margin assessment in oral cancer patients: a phase II trial. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):4952.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen J, Jiang Y, Chang TS, Joshi B, Zhou J, Rubenstein JH, et al. Multiplexed endoscopic imaging of Barrett’s neoplasia using targeted fluorescent heptapeptides in a phase 1 proof-of-concept study. Gut. 2021;70:1010–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hu Z, Fang C, Li B, Zhang Z, Cao C, Cai M, et al. First-in-human liver-tumour surgery guided by multispectral fluorescence imaging in the visible and near-infrared-I/II windows. Nat Biomed Eng. 2020;4(3):259–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Netti PA, Berk DA, Swartz MA, Grodzinsky AJ, Jain RK. Role of extracellular matrix assembly in interstitial transport in solid tumors. Cancer Res. 2000;60:2497–503.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosenthal EL, Warram JM, de Boer E, Basilion JP, Biel MA, Bogyo M, et al. Successful translation of fluorescence navigation during oncologic surgery: a consensus report. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:144–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lu G, Fakurnejad S, Martin BA, Van Den Berg NS, Van Keulen S, Nishio N, et al. Predicting therapeutic antibody delivery human head and neck cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:2582–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kossatz S, Pirovano G, De DemétrioSouza França P, Strome AL, Sunny SP, Zanoni DK, et al. Validation of the use of a fluorescent PARP1 inhibitor for the detection of oral, oropharyngeal and oesophageal epithelial cancers. Nat Biomed Eng. 2020;4:272–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. de DemétrioSouza França P, Kossatz S, Brand C, KarassawaZanoni D, Roberts S, Guru N, et al. A phase I study of a PARP1-targeted topical fluorophore for the detection of oral cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:3618-3630.26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang J, Li S, Wang K, Zhu L, Yang L, Zhu Y, et al. A c-MET-targeted topical fluorescent pRObe cMBP-ICG improves oral squamous cell carcinoma detection in humans. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023;30:641–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Buckle T, van Alphen M, van Oosterom MN, van Beurden F, Heimburger N, van der Wal JE, et al. Translation of c-met targeted image-guided surgery solutions in oral cavity cancer-initial proof of concept data. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:2674.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vermorken JB, Specenier P. Optimal treatment for recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl 7):252–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. de Boer E, Warram JM, Tucker MD, Hartman YE, Moore LS, de Jong JS, et al. In Vivo Fluorescence Immunohistochemistry: Localization of Fluorescently Labeled Cetuximab in Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Sci Rep. 2015;5:10169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Allan DG. Nimotuzumab: evidence of clinical benefit without rash. Oncologist. 2005;10:760–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mahoney KM, Rennert PD, Freeman GJ. Combination cancer immunotherapy and new immunomodulatory targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;14:561–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bensch F, van der Veen EL, Lub-de Hooge MN, Jorritsma-Smit A, Boellaard R, Kok IC, et al. 89Zr-atezolizumab imaging as a non-invasive approach to assess clinical response to PD-L1 blockade in cancer. Nat Med. 2018;24:1852–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Zanotti L, Paderno A, Piazza C, Pagan E, Bignotti E, Romani C, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor detection in serum and saliva as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in oral cancer. Laryngoscope. 2017;127:E408–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Nicholson RI, Gee JM, Harper ME. EGFR and cancer prognosis. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37(Suppl 4):S9-15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Maurizi M, Almadori G, Ferrandina G, Distefano M, Romanini ME, Cadoni G, et al. Prognostic significance of epidermal growth factor receptor in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 1996;74:1253–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang X, Teng F, Kong L, Yu J. PD-L1 expression in human cancers and its association with clinical outcomes. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:5023–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wu P, Wu D, Li L, Chai Y, Huang J. PD-L1 and survival in solid tumors: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0131403.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Chowdhury S, Veyhl J, Jessa F, Polyakova O, Alenzi A, MacMillan C, et al. Programmed death-ligand 1 overexpression is a prognostic marker for aggressive papillary thyroid cancer and its variants. Oncotarget. 2016;7:32318–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Ukpo OC, Thorstad WL, Lewis JS Jr. B7–H1 expression model for immune evasion in human papilloma virus-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2013;7:113–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Turajlic S, Sottoriva A, Graham T, Swanton C. Resolving genetic heterogeneity in cancer. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20(7):404–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Rosenthal EL, Warram JM, de Boer E, Chung TK, Korb ML, Brandwein-Gensler M, et al. Safety and tumor specificity of cetuximab-IRDye800 for surgical navigation in head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:3658–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Warram JM, de Boer E, van Dam GM, Moore LS, Bevans SL, Walsh EM, et al. Fluorescence imaging to localize head and neck squamous cell carcinoma for enhanced pathological assessment. J Pathol Clin Res. 2016;2:104–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Mateo C, Moreno E, Amour K, Lombardero J, Harris W, Pérez R. Humanization of a mouse monoclonal antibody that blocks the epidermal growth factor receptor: recovery of antagonistic activity. Immunotechnology. 1997;3:71–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Crombet T, Osorio M, Cruz T, Roca C, del Castillo R, Mon R, et al. Use of the humanized anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody h-R3 in combination with radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1646–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ramos TC, Figueredo J, Catala M, González S, Selva JC, Cruz TM, et al. Treatment of high-grade glioma patients with the humanized anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody h-R3: report from a phase I/II trial. Cancer Biol Ther. 2006;5:375–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Bayés M, Rabasseda X, Prous JR. Gateways to clinical trials. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2007;29:697–735.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Peng Z, Lu C, Shi G, Yin L, Liang X, Song G, et al. Sensitive and quantitative in vivo analysis of PD-L1 using magnetic particle imaging and imaging-guided immunotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50:1291–305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. An Y, Bian C, Yan D, Wang H, Wang Y, Du Y, et al. A Fast and Automated FMT/XCT Reconstruction Strategy Based on Standardized Imaging Space. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2022;41:657–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Du Y, Jin Y, Sun W, Fang J, Zheng J, Tian J. Advances in molecular imaging of immune checkpoint targets in malignancies: current and future prospect. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:4294–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Weisheng Wen, Jingqiu Bu, Lei Zhang, Peng Chen, Qing Xi, Huawei Liu, Yipeng Ren, Lin Feng, Fei Chen, Lejun Xing, Bo Wei and Ye Tao for the support during the fresh OSCC patients’ biospecimens collection, Rui Wu for manuscript proofreading.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82272111, 92159303, 62027901), the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant number 2023YFC3402800), and Beijing Natural Science Foundation under Grant (L232097).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Nenghao Jin, Yu An, Yu Tian and Zeyu Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China

    Nenghao Jin & Yu Tian

  2. Department of Stomatology, The First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China

    Nenghao Jin

  3. CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China

    Nenghao Jin, Kunshan He, Chongwei Chi, Jie Tian & Yang Du

  4. Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine (Beihang University), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’ S Republic of China, School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China

    Yu An, Zeyu Zhang, Wei Mu & Jie Tian

  5. Department of Stomatology, Beijing Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China

    Yu Tian

  6. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100080, China

    Chongwei Chi & Yang Du

  7. State Key Laboratory of Computer Science and Beijing Key Lab of Human-Computer Interaction, Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China

    Kunshan He

Authors
  1. Nenghao Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu An
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yu Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zeyu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kunshan He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chongwei Chi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Wei Mu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jie Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yang Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NH J drafted the manuscript. NH J and Y T performed the experiments, collected OSCC tissue specimen. Y A developed a home-made multispectral fluorescence imaging system. NH J, ZY Z and KS H analyzed the data. CW C performed part of the experiments. W M, J T and Y D designed the study and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wei Mu, Jie Tian or Yang Du.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital (No. S2021-097–01). All participants provided written informed consent. The animal experiments were approved by the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Permit No: IA21-2203–24) at the Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the experiments were conducted in conformity with approved guidelines. Author confirm that all the experiments on the use of human tissue samples confirm that all experiment were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki’s guidelines and regulations. The study was approved and the participants gave their informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

12916_2024_3559_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Additional file 1: Table S1. Demographics of OSCC patients. Table S2. Results of the Acute Oral Toxicity Test. Table S3. Clinical data of mouthwash trials for OSCC patients. Fig. S1. Synthesis of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5. Fig. S2. Excitation and absorption spectra of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 under excitation light at 780 nm and 640 nm, respectively. Fig. S3. HOK, HSC3 and CAL27-fLUC cell lines were treated with cell viability at different concentrations of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5. Fig. S4. Serum assessment of liver function markers. Fig. S5. The in vivo toxicity of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5 were evaluated in healthy BALB/c-nu/nu male mice. H&E staining of heart, liver, kidney and spleen in different groups. Scale bar, 100 μm. Fig. S6. Bioluminescence imagingexperiments demonstrated the location of tongue tumors in a mouse model. Fig. S7. Optimal concentration analysis of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5. Fig. S8. Analysis of optimum incubation time of Nimotuzumab-ICG and Atezolizumab-Cy5.5

Additional file 2. Original images of Western blotting

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, N., An, Y., Tian, Y. et al. Multispectral fluorescence imaging of EGFR and PD-L1 for precision detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a preclinical and clinical study. BMC Med 22, 342 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03559-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03559-w

Keywords

BMC Medicine

ISSN: 1741-7015

Contact us