Skip to main content
Download PDF

The effects of increased dose of hepatitis B vaccine on mother-to-child transmission and immune response for infants born to mothers with chronic hepatitis B infection: a prospective, multicenter, large-sample cohort study

BMC Medicine volume 19, Article number: 148 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Appropriate passive-active immunoprophylaxis effectively reduces mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of hepatitis B virus (HBV), but the immunoprophylaxis failure was still more than 5% under the current strategy. The study objective was to investigate the effects of high dose of HB vaccine on MTCT and immune response for infants born to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive mothers.

Methods

This was a prospective, multicenter, large-sample cohort study in four sites of China, and 955 pairs of HBsAg-positive mothers and their infants were enrolled in our investigation. The infants were given 10 μg or 20 μg HB vaccine (at age 0, 1, and 6 months) plus HB immunoglobulin (at age 0 and 1 month). Serum HBsAg, antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs), and/or HBV DNA levels in the infants were determined at age 12 months. The safety of 20 μg HB vaccine was evaluated by adverse events and observing the growth indexes of infants.

Results

Thirteen of 955 infants were HBsAg-positive at 12 months. Stratification analysis showed that immunoprophylaxis failure rates in the 20 μg group were not significantly different from the 10 μg group, whatever maternal HBV load was high or not. But the high dose of HB vaccine significantly reduced low-response rate (anti-HBs 10–100 IU/L) (P = 0.002) and middle-response rate (anti-HBs 100–1000 IU/L) (P = 0.022) and improved high-response rate (anti-HBs ≥ 1000 IU/L) (P < 0.0001) in infants born to mothers with HBV DNA < 5 log10 IU/mL. For infants born to mothers with HBV DNA ≥ 5 log10 IU/mL, 20 μg HB vaccine did not present these above response advantages. The 20 μg HB vaccine showed good safety for infants.

Conclusions

The 20 μg HB vaccine did not further reduce immunoprophylaxis failure of infants from HBsAg-positive mothers, but increased the high-response and decreased low-response rates for infants born to mothers with HBV DNA < 5 log10 IU/mL.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-PRC-09000459

Peer Review reports

Background

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a serious threat to public health and is associated with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in China. It is estimated that the prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in China is 5–6% at present, and about 70 million persons have chronic HBV infection, including 20–30 million chronic HB (CHB) patients [1, 2]. In high-endemic areas, mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) is the main route of HBV infection. According to guidelines for the prevention of CHB, passive-active combined immunization can reduce the rate of MTCT from 75–90% to 10%. Infants received 100 IU HB immunoglobulin (HBIG) intramuscularly and 10 μg HB vaccine within 12 h after birth, with additional HB vaccination at 1 and 6 months. However, immunoprophylaxis failure rate is 5–10% in infants born to mothers positive for HBsAg and HB e antigen (HBeAg) [3, 4].

HBIG injection in late pregnancy seems to have little effect on reducing MTCT of HBV [5,6,7]. At present, it is recommended that the pregnant women with high viral load take tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or telbivudine orally in the second or third trimester to reduce further the rate of MTCT, but the long-term safety of mothers and infants and hepatitis flare after postpartum discontinuation are controversial [8].

HB vaccine has 95% effectiveness in preventing HB infection and has a good safety record [1]. Many previous studies have shown that 20 μg HB vaccine can significantly improve the seroprotection in adults compare to 10 μg HB vaccine [9,10,11]. The current recommended dose of recombinant HB vaccine for infants in China is 10 μg [12]. In our previous study, after three doses of the HB vaccine, 1.4% of infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers did not achieve a protective level (anti-HBs ≤ 10 IU/L), and 3.7% of infants had a low response level (anti-HBs 10–99 IU/L) [13]. These infants face potential infective risk in their daily lives being in close contact with HBsAg-positive mothers. Vaccine type, low birth weight, and high maternal viral load have been identified as the most important risk factors for low immune response to HBV vaccine. In addition, host genetic background also plays an important role in determining the strength of immune response to vaccination, such as variants in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region, mitogen-activated protein kinase eight polymorphisms [14]. Few studies have been reported about the effects of increased dose of HB vaccine on infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers. Therefore, we conducted a prospective, multicenter, large-sample cohort study to evaluate the effects of increased dose of HB vaccine (20 μg) on MTCT of HBV and immune response in infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers.

Methods

Study design

This was a prospective, multicenter, large-sample study. Patients were recruited from 4 hospitals in Beijing, Shijiazhuang, Taiyuan, and Tongliao, China. We evaluated and compared the effects of 20 μg HB vaccine on infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers, including immunoprophylaxis failure, immune responses to vaccine, and vaccine safety. The HBsAg-positive mothers were enrolled at 24–28 weeks’ gestation, and peripheral blood samples were collected at parturition for chemical and hematological tests. Demographic information of their infants was recorded at birth, including sex, singleton status, gestational age, birth weight, delivery mode, and 1-min APGAR scores as the baseline data. The infants were divided into two groups according to their mothers’ wishes: 10 μg (0.5 mL) recombinant HB vaccine plus HBIG (10 μg group) and 20 μg (1 mL) recombinant HB vaccine plus HBIG (20 μg group). The details of informed consent are described in Additional file 1: Appendix 1, Methods. All the vaccinations were completed at the corresponding investigational sites, and the adverse events were recorded at each follow-up at 1, 6, and 12 months. At 12 months, peripheral serum samples were taken from infants after standard immunoprophylaxis, and their HBsAg, anti-HBs, HBeAg, anti-HBe, and HB core antibody (anti-HBc) were tested. If the infant was positive for HBsAg, HBV DNA was further tested. The fetal development and infant growth were evaluated at 12 months in both HB vaccine groups. The study protocol was approved by each institutional Ethics Committee and registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR, No. ChiCTR-PRC-09000459).

Patients

Patient screening began from January 2009 to September 2010, and the last patient visit was on October 2011. The inclusion criteria for the mothers were as follows: HBsAg positive for > 6 months; age 18–45 years; and willing to cooperate with collection of documented information from 24 to 28 weeks’ gestation, the corresponding intervention measures, follow-up, and detection according to the informed consent. Major exclusion criteria for mothers were (1) infection with hepatitis C/D, human immunodeficiency virus, Treponema pallidum or Toxoplasma gondii; (2) treated with HBIG or antiviral therapy including interferon within 6 months before or during pregnancy; (3) alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥ 2× upper limit of normal (ULN) or total bilirubin (TBIL) ≥ 2 mg/dL (34.2 μmol/L), indicating cirrhosis and other liver diseases; (4) malignant tumor or definite disease in the cardiovascular, respiratory, urinary, nervous, digestive, blood, endocrine, or metabolic systems; (5) long-term use of hormones or immunosuppressive agents; and (6) taking part in other studies. The major exclusion criteria for infants were (1) prematurity (born at less than 36 weeks’ gestation), (2) birth weight < 2000 g, (3) congenital malformation, and (4) taking part in other studies.

Immunization schedule

All infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers had the following prophylaxis schedule: the first dose of 200 IU HBIG (Chengdu Institute of Biological Products, China or Hualan Biological Engineering Inc., China) and the first dose of 10 μg (0.5 mL) or 20 μg (1 mL) recombinant HB vaccine (Hansenula yeast vaccine; Dalian Hissen Biopharm Co., China) were given intramuscularly within 2 h of birth at different sites. The second injection of the same dose of HBIG was administered at 1 month of age. The second and third doses of recombinant HB vaccines were given at 1 and 6 months of age, respectively.

Serum biochemistry and HBV markers

All serum specimens were tested in the hospital central laboratory. The presence of HBsAg, anti-HBs, HBeAg, anti-HBe, and anti-HBc was determined using an electrical chemiluminescence immunoassay (Roche Laboratories, Mannheim, Germany) or chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay kit (Architect i2000 analyzer; Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL, USA). All the serum samples for HBV DNA were tested by real-time polymerase chain reaction with a range of 2–8 log10 IU/mL (Hunan Shengxiang Bio-engineering). ALT was measured by a fully automatic biochemical analyzer (AU5400; Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan). ALT > 40 IU/L was considered abnormal.

Outcome assessment and definitions

The primary outcome was immunoprophylaxis failure, which was defined as infants who were HBsAg-positive at age 12 months [15, 16]. The secondary outcome was response status of infants to HB vaccine. All the HBsAg-negative infants (successful immunoprophylaxis) were divided into 4 groups as follows: anti-HBs < 10 IU/L was defined as non-responder, anti-HBs 10–100 IU/L was low-responder, anti-HBs 100–1000 IU/L was medium-responder, and anti-HBs ≥ 1000 IU/L was high-responder [13].

Statistical analysis

The database was established with EpiData 3.02. Continuous variables values were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD); categorical variables were expressed as percentages. The characteristics of infants who received different doses of the HB vaccine were compared by independent t-test and/or χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. The maternal HBV DNA level, ALT, and TBIL in two groups were compared by the Mann-Whitney U-test. The immunoprophylaxis failure rates (MTCT of HBV) in two doses of HB vaccines were cooperated, and the planned sample size of 955 patients was estimated to provide at least 85% power to detect an absolute difference of 3% in the proportion of infants with HBV infection at 12 months on the basis of two-tailed α = 0.05 and assuming an MTCT rate of 5% in the 10 μg HB vaccine group. A multivariate logistic regression model was fitted with a stepwise method (likelihood ratio test) using significant baseline characteristics (candidate variables such as mother age, HBV DNA ≥ 5 log10 IU/mL, and other clinical indicators with P < 0.20 in Table 1) that had been prefiltered in univariate analysis to identify factors independently associated with vaccine dose grouping. The response rates of different degrees in infants between two doses of groups were compared by χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. The developmental indexes of infants at 12 months between two groups were compared by independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) or GraphPad Prism version 5.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). A two-sided P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Table 1 Main characteristics of HBsAg-positive mothers and their babies from two different dose of HB vaccine
Full size table

Results

Study populations

The study was performed at 4 investigational sites in China. A total of 1004 infants born to 1001 HBsAg-positive mothers (3 mothers had twins) were enrolled, and the numbers of patients enrolled from each site were as follows: 668 in Beijing, 108 in Taiyuan, 125 in Shijiazhuang, and 100 in Tongliao. At 12 months, a total of 955 infants completed the study, there were 478 infants who completed the follow-up in the 10 μg group, and 477 infants completed the follow-up in 20 μg HB group (Fig. 1); the groupings of these infants in respective site are showed in Additional file 1: Appendix 2 Table S1. The demographic characteristics of infants at birth and their mothers with chronic HBV infection in each group are shown in Table 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The flow chart of subject recruitment for this study. Abbreviation: HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen

Full size image

As more HBeAg-positive mothers with or without high load of HBV DNA prefer to choose high dose of HB vaccine (20 μg) for their infants, therefore, both the HBeAg-positive rate and HBV DNA levels in mothers in the 20 μg group were higher than those in the 10 μg group (both P < 0.001, Table 1). Further, we used multivariable logistic analysis to screen the possible confounders (in Table 1) that lead to the differences between the high and low vaccine groups. Results showed that the high level of maternal HBV DNA ( ≥5 log10 IU/mL) was the independent factor of differences in baseline characteristics between two dose groups (P < 0.001) (OR = 0.481, 95% CI 0.362–0.639). Therefore, we did stratified analysis in the following investigation according to the maternal HBV DNA level.

The outcomes to HB vaccines in infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers

Of the 955 infants after the standard immunization schedule, 13 infants were positive for HBsAg at 12 months, who were considered as immunoprophylaxis failure, and 942 were negative for HBsAg, who were considered as immunoprophylaxis success. The total rate of immunoprophylaxis failure was 1.4% (13/955). The characteristics of infants and their mothers between the two outcomes are shown in Additional file 1: Appendix 2 Table S2; high level of maternal HBV DNA and HBeAg-positive were the major differences between immunoprophylaxis failure and success. Among the 13 HBsAg-positive infants, 5 were in the 10 μg group and 8 were in the 20 μg group. The baseline characteristics of the infants at birth and HBV infection status at age 12 months are shown in Table 2. At 12 months, all the 13 HBsAg-positive infants were positive for HBeAg and anti-HBc.

Table 2 Main characteristics of HBV-infected babies in two different doses of HB vaccine
Full size table

The response differences to HB vaccine between low-dose and high-dose groups

Regarding the influence of high level of maternal HBV DNA, we compared the immunoprophylaxis failure rate and response status of infants between 10 μg and 20 μg groups by stratified analysis. There were 601 infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers with HBV DNA < 5 log10 IU/mL, 350 were in the 10 μg group and 251 were in the 20 μg group. None of the infants was positive for HBsAg in the 10 μg group (0%, 0/350), and 1 was positive in the 20 μg group (0.4%, 1/251); the immunoprophylaxis failure rates between two groups were not significantly different (P = 0.418, Table 3). However, the high-response rate in the 20 μg group (42.2%, 106/251) was evidently higher than that in the 10 μg group (22.9%, 80/350) (P < 0.001); on the contrary, the low-response rate (P = 0.002) and middle-response rate (P = 0.022) in the 20 μg group were both lower than those in the 10 μg group (Table 3). There was no difference in non-response rate between two groups (Table 3).

Table 3 The response differences to HB vaccine in infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers in two groups
Full size table

In the 354 infants born to mothers with high load of HBV DNA (≥ 5 log10 IU/mL), 128 were in the 10 μg group and 226 were in the 20 μg group. Among them, 5 infants (3.9%, 5/128) were HBsAg-positive in the 10 μg group and 7 infants (3.1%, 7/226) were HBsAg-positive in the 20 μg group. The immunoprophylaxis failure rates between two groups were not obviously different (P = 0.922). Interestingly, there were no significant differences in response rates of various levels between two groups, from non-response to high-response (Table 3). These were different from the infants born to mothers with low load of HBV DNA.

High dose of HB vaccine safety for infants

Of the 955 infants who finished follow-up, the adverse events were reported in 9 infants: 4 in the 10 μg HB vaccine group (0.8%, 4/478) and 5 in the 20 μg HB vaccine group (1.0%, 5/477). Among the 9 infants, 5 had adverse injection reactions (local swelling and induration) to the first dose of vaccine (2 in the 10 μg group and 3 in the 20 μg group). Additionally, 2 cases developed fever (1 in each group), and 2 had hives (10 μg group). No severe adverse events were reported to vaccination.

We also evaluated the safety of 20 μg HB vaccine by observing the growth indexes of infants at age 12 months. There were no differences in these growth indexes between the two groups, except for body length, which was longer in the 20 μg vaccine group (P = 0.04) (Table 4), but still within the normal range of Chinese children’s growth and development indicators [17]. The results suggested that 20 μg HB vaccine is safe for infants.

Table 4 Developmental index of infants between two doses of HB vaccine at 12 months
Full size table

Discussion

This is a prospective, multicenter, large-sample cohort study. We compared the effects of increased dose (20 μg) and routine dose (10 μg) of HB vaccine combined with HBIG on infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers. Our results revealed that high dose of HB vaccine did not reduce MTCT of HBV, but could decrease low-response rate, middle-response rate, and increase high-response rate for those infants born to mothers with low viral load (HBV DNA < 5 log10 IU/mL). However, for those infants born to mothers with high viral load (HBV DNA ≥ 5 log10 IU/mL), the above response advantages of 20 μg HB vaccine were nearly not obvious.

Maternal HBV infection status, such as HBeAg positivity, HBV DNA, and intrauterine infection, is thought to be important for HBV MTCT [18,19,20]. Considering the importance of maternal virological factor, we performed stratified analysis to our findings according to the maternal HBV load. Data in each group showed that 20 μg HB vaccine did not significantly reduce the MTCT of HBV, whatever maternal HBV load was high or low. The reasons for immunoprophylaxis failure are not completely clear now. It is reported HBV breach of the placental barrier largely occurs in late pregnancy because of the thinner trophocyte layer, which forms the chorionic vascular membrane that facilitates HBV passage through the thinner placental barrier [21]. Therefore, administration of nucleoside analogs during late pregnancy, such as tenofovir dipivoxil fumarate and telbivudine, is beneficial for HBsAg-positive mothers with a high viral load and could effectively reduce the intrauterine HBV infection and increase the protection of vaccine and HBIG for infants [22,23,24].

Although 20 μg HB vaccine did not reduce MTCT of HBV, it did influence the immune response of infants, compared with 10 μg HB vaccine. For example, for the infants born to mothers with low level of HBV DNA (< 5 log10 IU/mL), 20 μg HB vaccine significantly increased the high-response rate and reduced the low-response rate. A related investigation on 1192 infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers reported that 20 μg HB vaccination reduced the risk of low responsiveness in infants with HLA-II risk genotype of HBsAg-positive mothers [25]. Some investigations on healthy individuals also demonstrated that 20 μg HB vaccine could increase the anti-HBs level compared with 10 μg HB vaccine [10, 11]. Therefore, some researchers think that for the immune non-responders and low-responders, more inoculations, a higher concentration of HB vaccine to increase the immunogenicity is reasonable [3], especially for those born to mothers whose HBV DNA are < 5 log10 IU/mL.

However, in those infants born to mothers with high viral loads (≥ 5 log10 IU/mL), 20 μg HB vaccine did not show the response advantages like those happened in infants born to mothers with low viral loads. Our results suggest that maternal HBV DNA levels might be related to the responses of their infants to HB vaccine, but the mechanism is still unknown. Lazizi et al. and Badur et al. demonstrated the relationship between unresponsiveness to HB vaccine in newborns and HBV DNA from maternal peripheral blood mononuclear cells [26, 27]. Some researchers have reported that transfer of maternal cells to newborn circulation participates in the immune response in an antigen-specific manner [28, 29]. Zhang et al. found that high maternal titer of anti-HBs can transplacentally impair immune response of infants towards HB vaccine [30]. Whether a similar mechanism can explain our results, it needs further research. In light of these findings, reducing maternal viral load in late pregnancy and increasing HB vaccine dose of infants might be advantageous to produce more effective immune response to HB vaccine for infants.

There were limitations in our study. We did not further test HBV DNA levels in HBsAg-negative infants at 12 months, although occult HBV infection has been reported at a low frequency in HB-vaccinated children, especially in those with absent or low anti-HBs levels [31, 32]. This factor might influence the accuracy of immunoprophylaxis failure and non-response rates of the HB vaccine. Additionally, the long-time prevention of 20 μg HB vaccine on these infants needed further follow-up and investigation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, increasing dose of HB vaccine (20 μg) did not further reduce the MTCT of HBV, but was helpful to enhance more effective immune response for infants born to mothers with low load of HBV DNA, by increasing high-response rate and decreasing low-response rate and middle-response rate. Our study is expected to provide clinical basis for further improving the strategy of enhancing protection of HB vaccine for infants in the perinatal period.

Availability of data and materials

In accordance with the current national law and consensus of researchers in this study, the data used in this study is only available for the researchers participating in this project. Thus, we are not allowed to distribute or make publicly available the data to other parties.

Abbreviations

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

anti-HBc:

Hepatitis B core antibody

anti-HBs:

Hepatitis B surface antibody

HB:

Hepatitis B

HBeAg:

HBV e antigen

HBIG:

Hepatitis B immunoglobulin

HBsAg:

HBV surface antigen

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency virus

MTCT:

Mother-to-child transmission

OR:

Odds ratios

SD:

Standard deviation

TBIL:

Total bilirubin

References

  1. Hepatitis B. World Health Organization Fact Sheets. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-b. Accessed 1 May 2020.

  2. Liu J, Liang W, Jing W, Liu M. Countdown to 2030: eliminating hepatitis B disease, China. Bull World Health Organ. 2019;97(3):230–8. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.18.219469.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ma L, Alla NR, Li X, Mynbaev OA, Shi Z. Mother-to-child transmission of HBV: review of current clinical management and prevention strategies. Rev Med Virol. 2014;24(6):396–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.1801.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Park JS, Pan CQ. Viral factors for HBV mother-to-child transmission. Hepatol Int. 2017;11(6):476–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-017-9825-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao M, Zou H, Chen Y, Zheng S, Duan Z. Efficacy of antepartum administration of hepatitis B immunoglobulin in preventing mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus. J Viral Hepat. 2019;26(9):1059–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvh.13123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Li XM, Shi MF, Yang YB, Shi ZJ, Hou HY, Shen HM, et al. Effect of hepatitis B immunoglobulin on interruption of HBV intrauterine infection. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10(21):3215–7. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v10.i21.3215.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Xiao XM, Li AZ, Chen X, Zhu YK, Miao J. Prevention of vertical hepatitis B transmission by hepatitis B immunoglobulin in the third trimester of pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;96(3):167–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.11.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dunkelberg JC, Berkley EM, Thiel KW, Leslie KK. Hepatitis B and C in pregnancy: a review and recommendations for care. J Perinatol. 2014;34(12):882–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.167.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. ul-Haq N, Hasnain SS, Umar M, Abbas Z, Valenzuela-Silva C, Lopez-Saura P. Immunogenicity of 10 and 20 microgram hepatitis B vaccine in a two-dose schedule. Vaccine. 2003;21(23):3179–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chiaramonte M, Majori S, Ngatchu T, Moschen ME, Baldo V, Renzulli G, et al. Two different dosages of yeast derived recombinant hepatitis B vaccines: a comparison of immunogenicity. Vaccine. 1996;14(2):135–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-410X(95)00148-T.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schiff GM, Sherwood JR, Zeldis JB, Krause DS. Comparative study of the immunogenicity and safety of two doses of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in healthy adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 1995;16(1):12–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/1054-139X(94)00105-N.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chinese Society of Infectios Diseases, Chinese Medical Association; Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association. The guidelines of prevention and treatment for chronic hepatitis B (2019 version). Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2019;27(12):938-61.

  13. Zou H, Chen Y, Duan Z, Zhang H. Protective effect of hepatitis B vaccine combined with two-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin on infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers. Plos One. 2011;6(10):e26748. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026748.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Cao MZ, Wu YH, Wen SM, Pan YC, Wang C, Kong F, et al. Mitogen-activated protein kinase eight polymorphisms are associated with immune responsiveness to HBV vaccinations in infants of HBsAg(+)/HBeAg(-) mothers. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):274. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3166-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pan CQ, Zou HB, Chen Y, Zhang X, Zhang H, Li J, et al. Cesarean section reduces perinatal transmission of hepatitis B virus infection from hepatitis B surface antigen-positive women to their infants. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(10):1349–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2013.04.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zou H, Chen Y, Duan Z, Zhang H, Pan C. Virologic factors associated with failure to passive-active immunoprophylaxis in infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers. J Viral Hepat. 2012;19(2):e18–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2893.2011.01492.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Capital Institute of Pediatrics,The Coordinating Study Group of Nine Cities on the Physical Growth and Development of Children. A national survey on physical growth and development of children under seven years of age in nine cities of China in 2015. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2018;56(3):192-9.

  18. Chen HL, Lin LH, Hu FC, Lee JT, Lin WT, Yang YJ, et al. Effects of maternal screening and universal immunization to prevent mother-to-infant transmission of HBV. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(4):773–81 e772. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2011.12.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yin YZ, Zhang J, Wu LL, Zhou J, Zhang PZ, Zhou SS. Development of strategies for screening, predicting, and diagnosing intrauterine HBV infection in infants born to HBsAg positive mothers. J Med Virol. 2013;85(10):1705–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.23667.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Joshi SS, Coffin CS. Hepatitis B and pregnancy: virologic and immunologic characteristics. Hepatol Commun. 2020;4(2):157–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep4.1460.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Yan Y, Xu D, Wang W. The role of placenta in hepatitis B virus intrauterine transmission. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1999;34(7):392–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang H, Pan CQ, Pang Q, Tian R, Yan M, Liu X. Telbivudine or lamivudine use in late pregnancy safely reduces perinatal transmission of hepatitis B virus in real-life practice. Hepatology. 2014;60(2):468–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.27034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pan CQ, Duan Z, Dai E, Zhang S, Han G, Wang Y, et al. Tenofovir to prevent hepatitis B transmission in mothers with high viral load. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(24):2324–34. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1508660.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li J, Chang MS, Tran TT, Nguyen MH. Management of chronic hepatitis B in pregnancy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017;51(9):789–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000000908.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cao M, Wu Y, Wen S, Pan Y, Wang C, Zhang X, et al. 20mug hepatitis B vaccination reduced the risk of low responsiveness in infants with HLA-II risk genotype of HBsAg positive mothers. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;63:243–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2018.06.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lazizi Y, Badur S, Perk Y, Ilter O, Pillot J. Selective unresponsiveness to HBsAg vaccine in newborns related with an in utero passage of hepatitis B virus DNA. Vaccine. 1997;15(10):1095–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(97)00005-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Badur S, Lazizi Y, Ugurlu M, Perk Y, Ilter O, Aydinli K, et al. Transplacental passage of hepatitis B virus DNA from hepatitis B e antigen-negative mothers and delayed immune response in newborns. J Infect Dis. 1994;169(3):704–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/169.3.704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang W, Guo Z, Zhang L, Liu Z, Li J, Ji Z, et al. Maternal immunization promotes the immune response of neonates towards hepatitis B vaccine. J Viral Hepat. 2013;20(12):875–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvh.12103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Reber AJ, Hippen AR, Hurley DJ. Effects of the ingestion of whole colostrum or cell-free colostrum on the capacity of leukocytes in newborn calves to stimulate or respond in one-way mixed leukocyte cultures. Am J Vet Res. 2005;66(11):1854–60. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1854.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang L, Gui XE, Teter C, Zhong H, Pang Z, Ding L, et al. Effects of hepatitis B immunization on prevention of mother-to-infant transmission of hepatitis B virus and on the immune response of infants towards hepatitis B vaccine. Vaccine. 2014;32(46):6091–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.08.078.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Su H, Zhang Y, Xu D, Wang B, Zhang L, Li D, et al. Occult hepatitis B virus infection in anti-HBs-positive infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers in China. Plos One. 2013;8(8):e70768. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070768.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Foaud H, Maklad S, Mahmoud F, El-Karaksy H. Occult hepatitis B virus infection in children born to HBsAg-positive mothers after neonatal passive-active immunoprophylaxis. Infection. 2015;43(3):307–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-015-0733-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the doctors, nurses, and patients who participated in our study.

Funding

This work was supported by National Science and Technology Key Project on “Major Infectious Diseases such as HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis Prevention and Treatment” (2017ZX10201201-001, 2017ZX10201201-002), Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Ascent Plan (DFL20151601); Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine (1212040205). Researchers are independent of the funders. The funder has no role in study design, data collection, analysis, and manuscript preparation.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xiaohui Zhang and Huaibin Zou contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Artificial Liver Treatment Center, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

    Xiaohui Zhang, Huaibin Zou, Yu Chen, Huimin Guo & Zhongping Duan

  2. Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Liver Failure and Artificial Liver Treatment Research, Beijing, China

    Xiaohui Zhang, Huaibin Zou, Yu Chen & Zhongping Duan

  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

    Hua Zhang, Ruihua Tian, Jun Meng & Yunxia Zhu

  4. Department of Liver Diseases, The Fifth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, China

    Erhei Dai & Baoshen Zhu

  5. Tongliao Infective Disease Hospital, Tongliao, China

    Zhongsheng Liu & Yanxia Jin

  6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taiyuan No. 3 Hospital, Taiyuan, China

    Yujie Li & Liping Feng

  7. Department of Microbiology and Center of Infectious Disease, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China

    Hui Zhuang & Jie Li

  8. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York University, Langone Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA

    Calvin Q. Pan

Authors
  1. Xiaohui Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huaibin Zou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hua Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ruihua Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jun Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yunxia Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Huimin Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Erhei Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Baoshen Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Zhongsheng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Yanxia Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Yujie Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Liping Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Hui Zhuang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Calvin Q. Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Jie Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Zhongping Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DZP and PC managed and supervised the study. CY, ZH (Hua Zhang), MJ, DEH, LZS, and LYJ supervised the study development of respective investigational sites. ZH (Hua Zhang), TRH, ZYX, GHM, ZBS, JYX, and FLP involved in the sample collection and assembly of the clinical data. ZXH and ZHB analyzed all the data. ZXH drafted the manuscript, and ZHB undertook the interpretation of the data. LJ and ZH (Hui Zhuang) gave suggestion of investigation, and LJ modified the draft. All the authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Calvin Q. Pan, Jie Li or Zhongping Duan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethical approval for this study was obtained by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University (NO 200907). Written consents were obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Appendix 1

. Methods. The main contents of informed consents; Statistics used in Table S2. Appendix 2. Table S1. The infants who completed the final follow-up at their respective investigational sites. Table S2. The comparison of characteristics of the failure infants and successful infants and their mothers.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Zou, H., Chen, Y. et al. The effects of increased dose of hepatitis B vaccine on mother-to-child transmission and immune response for infants born to mothers with chronic hepatitis B infection: a prospective, multicenter, large-sample cohort study. BMC Med 19, 148 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02025-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02025-1

Keywords

BMC Medicine

ISSN: 1741-7015

Contact us