Skip to main content
Download PDF

A novel 450-nm laser-mediated sinoporphyrin sodium-based photodynamic therapy induces autophagic cell death in gastric cancer through regulation of the ROS/PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway

BMC Medicine volume 20, Article number: 475 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has become an ideal and promising therapeutic method for fighting cancer, but its common application in clinical practice is prevented by the limitations of expensive devices in light sources and phototoxicity in photosensitizers. The aim of this study was to explore the antitumor efficiency of the novel 450-nm blue laser (BL) combined with sinoporphyrin sodium (DVDMS)-mediated PDT against human gastric cancer (GC) in vitro and in vivo, focusing on autophagy pathway.

Methods

Cell viability was detected by Cell Counting Kit-8 and colony formation assays in HGC27, MGC803, AGS, and GES-1 cells. Cell apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry and western blotting. The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was measured by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Autophagy was determined by transmission electron microscopy and western blotting. The antitumor effect of BL-PDT in vivo was detected by a subcutaneous tumor model in nude mice.

Results

The novel 450-nm laser-mediated DVDMS-based PDT caused remarkable growth inhibition and apoptosis induction in GC cells in vitro by the production of excessive ROS. Autophagy flux was induced by BL-PDT in GC cells, as determined by LC3 conversion assay, LC3 turnover assay, and mRFP-GFP-LC3 puncta assay. Furthermore, autophagy induction was demonstrated to positively contribute to BL-PDT-induced apoptotic effects on GC cells. Mechanically, ROS/PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway was identified to involve in the regulation of BL-PDT-induced autophagy as determined by transcriptomic analysis and functional studies. Consistently, xenograft studies confirmed the significant antitumor effect of BL-PDT and its favorable safety in vivo.

Conclusions

The novel 450-nm laser-mediated DVDMS-based PDT may be a safe and effective approach against GC. Our results thus provide compelling evidence for the therapeutic application of BL-PDT in human GC.

Peer Review reports

Background

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common and intractable malignant tumors worldwide; it has high morbidity and mortality and seriously affects the physical and mental health of human beings [1, 2]. According to statistics, there were over a million new cases of GC and seven hundred thousand deaths (equating to one in every twelve deaths) from the disease worldwide in 2018 [3]. However, these statistics are far higher in East Asian countries (especially Korea, Japan, and China) than in North America, Northern Europe, and African regions due to environmental and dietary differences [4, 5]. In recent years, with the progress of endoscopic technology and diagnostic methods, an increasing number of GC patients have been identified, but many sufferers are in the middle and late stages owing to the lack of early symptoms [1]. Surgical operation with curative intent is the primary therapeutic regimen for patients with early-stage GC, while palliative chemoradiotherapy and molecular targeted therapy are regarded as the main therapeutic options for advanced patients [6, 7]. Despite the constant innovations and improvements in the treatment of GC, the prognosis of patients is still not optimistic, especially in advanced stages [8]. Thus, to enhance the quality of life and survival time of patients with GC, there is an urgent need to explore more effective and safe innovative treatments for GC.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an emerging and promising noninvasive treatment strategy for malignancy and other diseases, including cancer of the stomach [9]. As early as 1900, the German scientist Raab found that combining a harmless dye (acridine) with visible light could kill paramecia, which was the first report of PDT and opened new avenues for the exploration of anticancer therapies [10]. Compared with traditional antitumor therapies, PDT shows strong selective toxicity for cancer cells and satisfactory safety for normal tissues, as well as less resistance and no long-term side effects [11]. PDT takes advantage of the cytotoxicity of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are generated by a specific wavelength light irradiating some kind of photosensitizers in the presence of sufficient oxygen [12]. Of note, these components are not cytotoxic when present alone, and only when combined will they lead to tumor cell death [13]. Although clinical studies of PDT in the treatment of GC have been reported before, it cannot be widely promoted in clinical practice due to the limitations of expensive devices in light sources and phototoxicity in photosensitizers [14,15,16]. Therefore, it is particularly important to explore novel light sources and photosensitizers of PDT.

In terms of photosensitizers, good chemical stability, high water solubility and photodynamic effect, low dark toxicity, and rapid clearance in patients should be the central characteristics of an ideal photosensitizer [12, 17]. As a novel sodium salt of the ether-linked porphyrin dimer, sinoporphyrin sodium (DVDMS) was isolated and purified from Photofrin II and showed great potential in PDT [18, 19]. DVDMS has stronger photodynamic effect and lower skin phototoxicity than traditional photosensitizers such as Photofrin and Hiporfin in several xenograft tumors, which has also been proven in our previous studies [20,21,22,23]. In addition, DVDMS has better water solubility and chemical stability and has been approved by the Chinese State Food and Drug Administration for performing phase II clinical trials in some advanced tumors.

In terms of light sources, the commonly used light source of PDT in clinical practice and research is a red laser (RL) with a 630-nm wavelength, which shows strong tissue penetration but is prone to energy attenuation, especially in a liquid environment [24]. Based on the long-term systematic and in-depth study of laser characteristics with different wavelengths, our team successfully developed the world’s first 450-nm laser surgery system, which can not only be used for vaporization and cutting in surgery, but can also serve as a new type of light source for PDT, and has been approved by the China National Medical Products Administration (20213010922). Our previous studies have shown that the 450-nm laser has the advantages of high-efficiency tissue vaporization, low laser tissue penetration, and good tissue solidification in different tissue-cutting processes, which could be a novel alternative to surgery for superficial diseases [25,26,27]. Based on the safety and efficacy of this wavelength laser, we intend to explore the effect of a low-dose 450-nm laser in PDT of superficial intracavitary tumors. From our previous investigation of the absorption spectra of porphyrin compounds, we found that the porphyrin photosensitizer has a good absorption effect at the wavelength of 450 nm [18]. In this study, using the novel light source and effective photosensitizer, we first explored the potential antitumor effect of the 450-nm laser-mediated DVDMS-based PDT for human gastric cancer and investigated the underlying molecular mechanism focusing on autophagic and apoptotic signaling pathway.

Methods

Sensitizers

Sinoporphyrin sodium (DVDMS, molecular formula: C68H66N8O9Na4, molecular weight: 1230.265 Da, purity: 98.5%) was produced by Jiangxi Qinglong High Technology Co., Ltd. (Yichun, China), dissolved in 0.9% sodium chloride to form a solution with a final concentration of 1.25 mg/mL, sterilized by a 0.22-μm filter, and stored in the dark at −20 °C. The chemical structure and absorption spectrum of DVDMS are presented in Fig. 1A, B.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The chemical structure, absorption spectrum, and cellular uptake of DVDMS. A The chemical structure of DVDMS. B The absorption spectrum of DVDMS. C Representative fluorescence images of the intracellular uptake of DVDMS after different incubation time points. Scale bar = 10 μm. D, E Flow cytometry analysis of the intracellular uptake of DVDMS for various times (n = 3, mean ± SD)

Full size image

Cell culture

The human GC cell lines HGC27 and AGS were purchased from the Cell Bank of Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China), and the human GC cell line MGC803 and human gastric epithelium cell line GES-1 were obtained from the Key Laboratory for Tumor Precision Medicine of Shaanxi Province (Xi’an, China). HGC27 and MGC803 cells were cultured in the RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma-Aldrich, WI, USA), AGS cells were maintained in Ham’s/F-12 medium (Procell, Wuhan, China), and GES-1 cells were grown in Eagle’s minimum essential medium (DMEM, Sigma-Aldrich, WI, USA), containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Biological Industries, Israel) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (New Cell & Molecular Biotech, Suzhou, China). All cells were incubated in a water-saturated atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C and were collected at the peak of the logarithmic growth phase for experiments.

Reagents and irradiation

The Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay kit was purchased from TargetMol (MA, USA), 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) assay kit was from Beyotime (Shanghai, China), N-acetylcysteine (NAC) was from Selleck (Shanghai, China), and 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) was from KeyGen BioTECH (Nanjing, China). The Annexin V-FITC/PI Apoptosis detection kit was purchased from BD Bioscience (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), chloroquine (CQ) phosphate salt was from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany), and 2-(4-Amidinophenyl)-6-indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride (DAPI) was from Solarbio (Beijing, China). We obtained 3-methyladenine (3-MA), LY294002, and 740 Y-P from MedChemExpress (Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA). All the other reagents were analytical grade commercial products.

Semiconductor lasers (excitation wavelength: 450 nm and 630 nm, respectively; manufacturer: Blueray Medical Ltd., Xi’an, China) were carried out as the source for the evocation of the photodynamic effect.

Detection of intracellular DVDMS uptake

All cell lines (HGC27, MGC803, AGS, and GES-1) were planted in 24-well plates (1 × 105 cells/well) and 6-well plates (3 × 105 cells/well), respectively, and incubated with DVDMS (1 μM) in the dark at 37 °C for indicated time periods. For measurement of the intracellular uptake of DVDMS, cells were collected at different incubation time points (0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 h) and detected with flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, BD, USA) and fluorescence microscopy (Olympus, Japan). The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of DVDMS in cells was recorded under uniform detection conditions.

Cell viability assay

Cell viability was estimated using CCK-8, colony formation, and EdU assays. The GC cell lines HGC27, MGC803, AGS, and gastric epithelium cell line GES-1 were cultured in 96-well plates (5 × 103 cells/well) and incubated with DVDMS at various concentrations (0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 μM) at 37 °C in darkness for 4 h and then exposed to an energy density of 10 mW/cm2 in a BL (wavelength 450 nm) for 600 s to achieve a final laser dose of 6 J/cm2. Meanwhile, DVDMS alone with the same concentration gradient was incubated separately to detect the cytotoxicity. After PDT for 24 h, CCK-8 was mixed with each well to detect cell viability and GraphPad Prism 8.0 software was performed to calculate the IC50. Notably, the IC50 of each cell line was selected as the appropriate incubation concentration of DVDMS in subsequent experiments. And then, the PDT effects of BL (450 nm) and RL (630 nm), or DVDMS and 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) on cells were compared under the same drug dose (IC50) and irradiation power (6 J/cm2), and morphological changes in the cells were observed under a microscope. In addition, the light dose correction (LDC) of BL and RL should be considered according to the method proposed by Schaberle [28].

A colony formation assay was carried out to assess the long-term proliferative potential of all GC cell lines after PDT. Meanwhile, the maximum IC50 of GC cell lines was used as the incubation concentration of DVDMS to observe the PDT effect on the proliferation of normal gastric mucosal cells. The treated cells were seeded in 6-well plates (600 cells/well) and cultured for 10 days. During this period, the culture medium was replaced with a fresh medium every 3 days. After visible colonies formed, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 10 min and incubated with 0.1% crystal violet solution for 20 min. The number of stained colonies containing more than 50 cells was observed and manually counted under a microscope.

For the EdU assay, cells were seeded in 24-well plates at a density of 1 × 105 cells/well. After PDT, the cells were incubated with EdU working solution for 2 h, fixed with 4% PFA, and permeated with 0.3% Triton X-100 PBS. And then, a series of reaction solutions were added to the well and the nuclei were finally stained with Hoechst. After that, the results of cell proliferation were visualized by a fluorescence microscope.

Measurement of intracellular ROS production

Briefly, cells were incubated with serum-free medium containing 10 μM DCFH-DA in the dark for 30 min prior to PDT. After treatment, the fluorescence intensity was observed immediately with a fluorescence microscope and then detected by flow cytometry. In addition, an electron spin resonance (ESR) spectrometer (A300-9.5/12, Bruker, Germany) was used to detect the different types of ROS, and 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidone (TEMP) and 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO) were selected as capture agents to identify singlet oxygen (1O2) and hydroxyl radicals (·OH), respectively.

For inhibitory experiments, cells were preincubated with 5 mM NAC (a ROS scavenger) for 1 h and washed with PBS three times after 1 h of PDT. Then, the fluorescence intensity and cell viability were assessed using the same method as above.

RNA sequencing

According to the instructions of Novogene Co., Ltd. Tianjin Sequencing Center, the total RNA extracts of HGC27 and MGC803 cells treated with BL-PDT were separated with TRIzol, isolated by chloroform, and extracted using ethanol, respectively. The cDNA library construction, library purification, and transcriptome sequencing were then carried out for deep data analysis. Of note, three duplicate samples from each group were used for RNA-sequencing analysis.

Apoptosis assay

The apoptotic ratios of HGC27, MGC803, and AGS cells treated with BL-PDT were detected via flow cytometry. The cells were respectively implanted into 6-well plates at a density of 3 × 105 cells/well. After BL-PDT for 24 h, the cells were washed twice with precooled PBS, collected in 1.5-mL tubes, and centrifuged at 500 g (4 °C) for 5 min. Subsequently, the cells were resuspended in 100 μL of a binding buffer and mixed with 4 μL of Annexin V-FITC and 4 μL of propidium iodide (PI) for 15 min. After that, 400 μL of binding buffer was added for dilution and flow cytometry was performed to measure the proportions of apoptotic cells.

Transfection and evaluation of fluorescent dots

According to the instructions of Hanbio Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), all GC cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 20 × 105 cells/well overnight. The appropriate concentrations of mRFP-GFP-LC3 adenovirus and polyethyleneimine were mixed and incubated for 20 min at room temperature and then slowly added to the serum-free medium, which was used to replace the original cell culture medium. After 24 h of transfection, the fresh serum medium was replaced. After 4 h of stabilization, the cells were digested by trypsin and planted in 24-well plates containing climbing sheets. After the growth of cell adhesion, PDT was performed. Then, the cells were incubated in the dark at 37 °C for 24 h, observed under a confocal fluorescence microscope, and analyzed by ImageJ software. In merged images, yellow fluorescent spots in transfected cells demonstrated autophagosomes, red spots indicated autophagic lysosomes, and the enhancement of both yellow and red fluorescent dots indicated increased autophagic flux.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis

After treatment with BL-PDT for 12 h, the cells were harvested and fixed with ice-cold 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 2 h at 4 °C. Then, the fixed cells were post-treated with 1% buffered osmium tetroxide for 1 h at 4 °C and dehydrated by subsequently passing through a graded series of ethanol. After fixation and embedding, the cell samples were sectioned into thin pieces, stained with 3% uranyl acetate/lead citrate, and finally visualized with an H-7650 TEM (Hitachi, Japan).

Western blot assay

The expression levels of involved proteins were measured by western blotting analysis and analyzed by ImageJ software. Briefly, the cell samples at 24 h after BL-PDT were collected and lysed in 1 × radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer with 1% phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride for 20 min on ice. After quantification by a bicinchoninic acid assay kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China), lysates were boiled for 10 min at 100 °C, and aliquots of 20 μg of protein were separated by 10% or 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes that were then blocked with 5% skim milk for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with primary antibodies on a shaker (4 °C, overnight). After 3 times of washing with TBST and 2 h of incubation with the corresponding secondary antibody at room temperature, the immunoblots on the membranes were observed using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The primary antibodies included LC3 and PARP antibodies (all from Cell Signaling Technology, USA); p62, Beclin-1, Bax, Bcl-2, Caspase 3, and Caspase 9 antibodies (all from Abcam, UK); and PI3K, p-PI3K, Akt, p-Akt, mTOR, and p-mTOR antibodies (all from Abmart, China). Mouse anti-human β-Actin antibody and goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibody were purchased from Abcam.

Animal experiment

BALB/c mice (age 4–5 weeks, male, 18–20 g body weight) were purchased from the Shanghai Experimental Animal Center of the Chinese Academic of Sciences (Shanghai, China) and housed in an air-conditioned animal center at 22 °C ± 2 °C with free access to food and water. All in vivo experimental procedures were approved by the ethics committee of Xi’an Jiao Tong University (Xi’an, China). After 1 week of adaptation, 6 × 106 MGC803 cells were subcutaneously injected into the right dorsal region of BALB/c mice. The body weight and tumor size of each animal were measured every other day, and the total volume was calculated as V = (length × width2)/2. When tumors reached an average volume of 100 mm3 (approximately 10–12 days post-injection), the mice were randomly divided into four groups: (1) control (0.9% saline, 0.1 mL), (2) 450-nm laser (60 J/cm2), (3) DVDMS (2 mg/kg, 0.1 mL), and (4) PDT (DVDMS + 450-nm laser). DVDMS was injected into the caudal vein, and irradiation was performed 24 h after injection [18]. Fourteen days after treatment, all the mice were sacrificed, and the entire tumors were collected and weighed.

In addition, the effects of 450-nm and 630-nm laser-mediated DVDMS-PDT on GC growth were also compared in vivo. The mice were randomly divided into three groups: (1) DVDMS (2 mg/kg, 0.1 mL), (2) RL-PDT (DVDMS + 630-nm laser (60 J/cm2)), and (3) PDT (DVDMS + 450-nm laser (60 J/cm2)), and the remaining steps were the same as above.

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis

After being fixed in 4% PFA for at least 24 h, the tumor tissue and major organs of each animal were embedded in paraffin, sliced into thick sections, and stained with H&E. Histopathological changes were observed with an inverted fluorescence microscope. For IHC examination, sliced tumor tissues were incubated with primary antibodies (LC3-II, p-Akt, and Ki-67) for 20 h at 4 °C and secondary antibody for 1 h. After visualization with diaminobenzidine solution conjugated with hematoxylin, the images were observed with a microscope and analyzed by ImageJ software.

Statistical analysis

All quantitative results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was carried out with GraphPad Prism 8.0 software by the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test and log-rank test. Statistical significance is expressed as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.

Results

Intracellular uptake of DVDMS

The intracellular uptake of DVDMS was assessed by detecting the MFI using fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. The red fluorescence of DVDMS was obviously detected in GC cells after incubation for 4 h (Fig. 1C and Additional file 1: Fig. S1A-B). Similarly, the results of flow cytometry showed that the accumulation of DVDMS in GC cells (HGC27, MGC803, and AGS) was more than 90% after 4 h of incubation (Fig. 1D, E). Conversely, the accumulation in normal gastric epithelial cell (GES-1) increased slowly, when compared with cancer cells (Fig. 1D, E). Thus, 4-h incubation of DVDMS was chosen for further experiments.

Cytotoxic and anti-proliferative effects of PDT on GC cells

Next, we aimed to determine the PDT effects of the novel 450-nm laser (BL) combined DVDMS on GC. As clearly seen in Fig. 2A, PDT significantly inhibited GC cell proliferation in a DVDMS dose-dependent manner, and the proliferation of GES-1 cells was not significantly inhibited by PDT. And DVDMS at the same concentration alone without irradiation did not show obvious cytotoxicity in any cell line. According to the cell viability assay data, the IC50 of each cell line was calculated and used in subsequent experiments (HGC27: 0.13 μM; MGC803: 0.12 μM; AGS: 0.084 μM). Of note, a combination of BL and DVDMS showed better PDT effects than traditional 630 nm (RL) and 5-ALA under the same conditions (Fig. 2B and Additional file 1: Fig. S1C). Morphologically, more obvious changes, such as condensed chromatin and nuclear fragmentation, were observed in the BL-PDT group than in the RL-PDT group, while no visible changes were found in the control, laser, or DVDMS alone groups (Fig. 2C). The strong anti-proliferative effects of BL-PDT on GC cells were further confirmed by colony formation test and EdU assay (Fig. 2D, E and Additional file 1: Fig. S1D-F). Interestingly, the proliferation ability of normal gastric mucosal was not affected by any type of PDT (Fig. 2D, E and Additional file 1: Fig. S1D-F).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Anti-proliferative effects of PDT on GC cells. A Photodynamic effect and cytotoxicity of DVDMS on cells for 24 h (n = 3, mean ± SD). B Comparison of cytotoxic effect after different treatments for 24 h (n = 3, mean ± SD). C Representative morphology images of GC cells after different treatments for 24 h. Scale bar = 10 μm. D Colony formation test after treating with BL-PDT and RL-PDT. E EdU assay after treating with BL-PDT and RL-PDT. Scale bar = 50 μm. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001

Full size image

Of note, the real effect in PDT is recommended to be evaluated by the actual light dose absorbed by the photosensitizer, which can be calibrated by the relative parameter LDC. According to the method proposed by Schaberle [28], the LDC values of BL and RL are calculated as 0.48 (BL) and 0.11 (RL), respectively. Hence, to achieve the same PDT effect as BL, the output energy of RL needs to be increased by more than 4 times.

PDT induces ROS production in GC cells

It is well known that the mechanistic basis of cell damage induced by PDT is closely associated with the generation of intracellular ROS. Consistent with previous studies, we found that BL-PDT significantly increased the fluorescence intensity of the intracellular ROS probe compared to the other treatments under the fluorescence microscope (Fig. 3A, B). Moreover, the ESR results indicated that more 1O2 and ·OH were produced in the BL-PDT group (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, the results of flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy showed that the amount of ROS in the BL-PDT group decreased significantly after adding the ROS scavenger NAC (Fig. 3D and Additional file 1: Fig. S2A-B). Functionally, inhibitory effects of BL-PDT on the cell survival rate and proliferation rate were greatly rescued by NAC, suggesting the vital role of ROS in mediating cell growth inhibition (Fig. 3E, F and Additional file 1: Fig. S2C-E).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effects of PDT on ROS production in GC cells. A, B Representative fluorescence images and quantitative analysis of intracellular ROS detection. Scale bar = 50 μm (n = 3, mean ± SD). C ESR spectra of TEMP/1O2 and DMPO/·OH after different treatments. D Flow cytometry analysis of the ROS amount after adding NAC (incubation 2 h). E Colony formation test of HGC27 cells after adding NAC (incubation 2 h). F EdU assay of HGC27 cells after adding NAC (incubation 2 h). Scale bar = 50 μm. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001

Full size image

Differentially expressed genes and enrichment analysis in GC cells after 450-nm laser/DVDMS-mediated PDT

To explore the molecular changes in GC cells induced by BL-PDT, RNA-seq was performed. The results showed that significant differences in gene expression occurred after treatment (Fig. 4A and Additional file 1: Fig. S3A), in which 4995 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) including 2683 upregulated genes and 2312 downregulated genes were identified in HGC27 cells, and 4417 DEGs including 2183 upregulated genes and 2234 downregulated genes in MGC803 cells as shown in the volcano plot (Fig. 4B and Additional file 1: Fig. S3B). Enrichment analysis by GO indicated that most of the DEGs were enriched in cell autophagy and apoptosis processes (Fig. 4C and Additional file 1: Fig. S3C), and similar results were also observed in the gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of KEGG (Fig. 4D).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Apoptotic effects of 450-nm laser/DVDMS-mediated PDT on GC cells. A, B Heatmap and volcano plot of the DEGs in HGC27 cells between BL-PDT group vs. BL group. C, D GO and KEGG enrichment analysis of the DEGs in HGC27 cells. E, F Flow cytometry analysis of the apoptosis in GC cells after the treatment of 24 h (n = 3, mean ± SD). G Western blotting analysis of the expression levels of apoptosis-related proteins after the treatment of 24 h. H Quantitative analysis of G (n = 3, mean ± SD). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001

Full size image

450-nm laser/DVDMS-mediated PDT induces apoptosis in GC cells

To explore whether BL-PDT-mediated inhibition of GC cell growth is related to apoptosis, we performed Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide (PI) double staining combined with flow cytometry to detect and analyze the apoptotic rate of cells. The results showed that the apoptotic cells in the BL-PDT group were significantly increased compared with the other groups (Fig. 4E, F and Additional file 1: Fig. S3D). Consistently, the western blotting analysis also demonstrated that BL-PDT downregulated the expression of Bcl-2, pro-caspase 3, pro-caspase 9, and PARP and upregulated the expression of Bax, cleaved-caspase 9, and cleaved-PARP in GC cells (Fig. 4G, H and Additional file 1: Fig. S3E-F).

450-nm laser/DVDMS-mediated PDT activates autophagy in GC cells

Then, we investigated whether BL-PDT could initiate autophagy in the three GC cell lines. First, to assess the autophagic flux of GC cells upon BL-PDT, cells were transfected with an adenovirus encoding mRFP-GFP-LC3. Compared to the other groups, the BL-PDT group had a significantly increased number of red spots inside these three GC cell lines after 24 h of treatment, suggesting a complete autophagic flux induced by BL-PDT (Fig. 5A, B and Additional file 1: Fig. S4A). Then, the intracellular ultrastructure of the GC cells treated with BL-PDT was detected by TEM, which is a classic method for determining autophagy. And the typical autophagic double membrane-containing vacuoles were observed in the cytoplasm of GC cells after BL-PDT (Fig. 5C and Additional file 1: Fig. S4B). In the control group (450-nm laser alone), the morphology of the cytoplasm and organelles was normal, and no obvious autophagic vacuoles were observed.

Fig. 5
figure 5

450-nm laser/DVDMS-mediated PDT induced autophagy flux in GC cells. A Representative fluorescence images of autophagy dots in GC cells after the treatment of 24 h. Scale bar = 10 μm. B Quantitative analysis of A (n = 3, mean ± SD). C Typical TEM images of the autophagic vacuoles (indicated by the red arrow) after PDT for 24 h. D Western blotting analysis of the expression levels of autophagy-related proteins after the treatment of 24 h. E Quantitative analysis of D (n = 3, mean ± SD). F Western blotting analysis of the effect of inhibitor CQ for 4 h on autophagy. G Quantitative analysis of F (n = 3, mean ± SD). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001

Full size image

Next, we explored the effect of BL-PDT on the expression of key autophagy-related molecules in GC cells by western blotting. The results indicated that BL-PDT significantly enhanced the accumulation of LC3-II and Beclin-1 and reduced the expression of p62 in GC cells (Fig. 5D, E and Additional file 1: Fig. S4C). Moreover, a strong accumulation of LC3-II was observed after adding the lysosomal inhibitor CQ, indicating the activation of autophagy (Fig. 5F, G, and Additional file 1: Fig. S4D).

Autophagy positively contributes to 450-nm laser/DVDMS-mediated PDT-induced apoptosis in GC cells

To further illustrate the relationship between autophagy and apoptosis induced by BL-PDT, the inhibitor 3-MA of autophagy initiation was applied. The results showed that BL-PDT-induced downregulation of p62 and upregulation of Beclin-1 and LC-3 II were markedly reversed (Fig. 6A, B and Additional file 1: Fig. S4E). Consistently, the number of red fluorescent spots inside GC cells was decreased after adding 3-MA (Fig. 6C, D and Additional file 1: Fig. S4F). In addition, 3-MA treatment significantly reversed the expression of apoptosis-related molecules induced by BL-PDT (Fig. 6E, F and Additional file 1: Fig. S4G), increased the cell survival rates (Additional file 1: Fig. S4H), and decreased cell apoptosis rates (Fig. 6G, H and Additional file 1: Fig. S4I). Interestingly, no significant change of the intracellular ROS level was observed (Additional file 1: Fig. S4J-K). Thus, these results indicated that cell autophagy was indeed activated by 450-nm laser/DVDMS-mediated PDT and played a positive role in the process of apoptosis.

Fig. 6
figure 6

450-nm laser/DVDMS-mediated PDT induced autophagic cell death in GC cells. A Western blotting analysis of the effect of inhibitor 3-MA for 12 h on autophagy. B Quantitative analysis of A (n = 3, mean ± SD). C Representative fluorescence images of autophagy dots after adding inhibitor 3-MA. Scale bar = 10 μm. D Quantitative analysis of C (n = 3, mean ± SD). E Western blotting analysis of the effect of autophagy on BL-PDT inducing apoptosis after adding inhibitor 3-MA. F Quantitative analysis of E (n = 3, mean ± SD). G, H Flow cytometry analysis of the apoptosis after adding inhibitor 3-MA (n = 3, mean ± SD). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001

Full size image

450-nm laser/DVDMS-mediated PDT induces autophagy via regulating the ROS/PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway

As the classic pathway of autophagy, the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway was found to be involved in BL-PDT induced autophagy by KEGG enrichment analysis (Fig. 7A). The protein expression levels of p-PI3K, p-Akt, and p-mTOR in the BL-PDT group were significantly decreased compared with those in the laser or DVDMS alone group, which indicated that the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway was inhibited by BL-PDT (Fig. 7B, C and Additional file 1: Fig. S5A). Then, the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 and activator 740 Y-P were used to elucidate the involvement of this pathway. The results showed that the combination of BL-PDT and LY294002 could play a synergistic effect in inhibiting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway and the process of autophagy, while 740 Y-P rescued this effect (Fig. 7D, E and Additional file 1: Fig. S5B-D). Moreover, the expression levels of autophagy-associated proteins were reversed, the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway was reactivated, and autophagic vacuoles in the cytoplasm were decreased after adding ROS scavenger NAC (Fig. 7F–H and Additional file 1: Fig. S5B-D). The above results indicated that 450-nm laser/DVDMS-mediated PDT induced autophagy by producing ROS and inhibiting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Inhibition of the ROS/PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway by 450-nm laser/DVDMS-mediated PDT. A KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of differentially expressed transcripts in HGC27 cells. B Western blotting analysis of the expression levels of pathway-related proteins after the treatment of 24 h. C Quantitative analysis of B (n = 3, mean ± SD). D Western blotting analysis of the expression levels of autophagy- and pathway-related proteins after adding inhibitor LY294002 and activator 740 Y-P for 24 h. E Quantitative analysis of D (n = 3, mean ± SD). F Western blotting analysis of the expression levels of autophagy- and pathway-related proteins after adding ROS scavenger NAC (incubation 2 h). G Quantitative analysis of F (n = 3, mean ± SD). H TEM images of the autophagic vacuoles (indicated by the red arrow) after adding NAC. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001

Full size image

450-nm laser/DVDMS-mediated PDT inhibits tumor growth in vivo

To explore the antitumor efficiency of BL-PDT in vivo, MGC803 cell subcutaneous xenograft models were constructed in BALB/c nude mice. Typically, xenografted mice received an injection of DVDMS in the caudal vein on day 14, followed by irradiation on the xenografts with a 450-nm laser on the next day (Fig. 8A). The results indicated that tumor growth in the BL-PDT group was significantly inhibited compared with the RL-PDT group or those non-PDT groups (Fig. 8B, C and Additional file 1: Fig. S5F-G). Moreover, the tumor volumes and weights were significantly reduced in the BL-PDT group (Fig. 8E, F and Additional file 1: Fig. S5I-J), while no significant changes were observed in the body weight of nude mice among each group (Fig. 8D and Additional file 1: Fig S5H).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Anticancer effect of 450-nm laser/DVDMS-mediated PDT in vivo. A Schematic of time schedule for tumor implantation, DVDMS injection, laser irradiation, and monitoring of tumor growth. B Representative photos of tumor-bearing mice after different treatments. C Photographs of tumor tissues after different treatments. D, E Relative body weight and tumor volume changes of mice during different treatments. F Tumor weight changes after different treatments. G H&E staining and IHC analysis of tumors of the mice after different treatments. Scale bar = 50 μm. H Quantitative analysis of G (n = 3, mean ± SD). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001

Full size image

Then, the tumor tissues and important organs of the model mice were analyzed by H&E and IHC. We observed significantly increased expression of LC3-II and decreased expression of p-Akt and Ki-67 in the BL-PDT group (Fig. 8G, H), while no remarkable pathological differences in vital organs (heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney) were found among each group (Additional file 1: Fig. S5E). Taken together, the above results indicated that BL-PDT could safely and effectively inhibit the growth of GC in vivo.

Discussion

Currently, GC is a major global health problem, with an increasing incidence rate and social impact worldwide, especially in Asian countries [29, 30]. For patients with well-differentiated early-stage GC confined to the mucosa or submucosa, a favorable prognosis might be achieved by endoscopic submucosal dissection or suitable surgical operation [31, 32]. Once the tumor infiltrates the muscle layer or metastases, radical operation combined with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and targeted therapy based on risk factors just can control the patient’s disease as much as possible [33]. As a promising therapy with high efficiency, minimal invasiveness, and few side effects, PDT is considered as an optional diagnostic and therapeutic regimen for GC in many countries, whether patients are in an early or advanced stage [14, 34, 35]. Specifically in our study, the results demonstrated that the 450-nm laser-mediated PDT exerted significant anticancer effects on human GC cells in vitro and in vivo, while it had little toxicity on human gastric mucosal epithelial cells and nude mice. Moreover, we particularly found that BL-PDT might induce remarkable autophagy by regulation of the ROS/PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in human GC cells, as illustrated in the schematic diagram in Fig. 9. Hence, in the future, 450-nm laser/DVDMS-mediated PDT will have a broad clinical application in GC treatment.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Schematic model of the proposed mechanism of the novel 450-nm laser/DVDMS-mediated PDT in GC cells

Full size image

As reported in previous studies, ROS is one of the main initiators of PDT-induced cancer cell damage [36, 37]. Substantial ROS contributed by PDT may damage cellular lipids, proteins, and DNA; lead to mitochondrial or endoplasmic reticulum (ER) dysfunction; and trigger critical cellular signaling pathways, including apoptosis and autophagy [38]. But in fact, there may be a feedback loop between the accumulation of ROS and the activation of autophagy. As one of the main degradation systems of damaged, denatured, and senescent substances in cells, autophagy could remove not only oxidized/damaged proteins but also bulky ROS-generating organelles (such as mitochondria and peroxisome) to restrict the production and function of ROS [39]. And the study of Scherz-Shouval et al. demonstrated that the low levels of ROS could induce autophagy, which, in turn, degrades catalase, thereby increasing the levels of H2O2 and ROS, which further induces autophagy [40]. Hence, the accumulation of ROS and activation of autophagy may have a dual role of mutual promotion and inhibition in triggering subsequent cell reaction. In this study, we found that the ROS in GC cells was significantly enhanced after BL-PDT treatment, while the ROS scavenger NAC could reverse this phenotype. Hence, the loss of cell viability should be related to PDT-mediated intracellular ROS production. Nevertheless, the potential mechanism of ROS-induced cell injury and decreased proliferation is not completely clear.

In a study of PDT for human colorectal cancer, large amounts of ROS could induce extensive autophagy via activation of the ROS/JNK signaling pathway, while the anticancer efficiency mediated by verteporfin (VP)-PDT was markedly reduced by the additional use of antioxidants and autophagic inhibitors [41], whereas Mao et al. reported that the combination of carboplatin and 9-hydroxypheophorbide α-PDT could inhibit the epithelial-mesenchymal transformation of human laryngeal cancer cells through ROS-mediated inhibition of the MEK/ERK signaling pathway [42]. In addition, Huang and his colleagues demonstrated that pyropheophorbide-α methyl ester-mediated PDT could suppress the migration/invasion of breast tumor by inhibiting Akt-NF-κB-dependent MMP-9 expression via ROS [43]. In the present study, 450-nm laser/DVDMS-mediated PDT induced autophagy and apoptosis, which might involve the inhibition of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. However, further studies are still needed to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the ROS-mediated regulation of phosphorylation of PI3K.

Effective treatment delivery and exertion in PDT requires the coordination of a light source, photosensitizer, and delivery device appropriate to the target tissue. The wavelength of most PDT light sources used in the clinical setting is 630–850 nm, which has a strong tissue penetration but is easy to attenuate in a liquid environment. As far as photosensitizers are concerned, the light absorption intensity of porphyrin photosensitizers including DVDMS commonly used in clinical practice or experimental study is not quite ideal at 630–880nm [18]. In photodynamic diagnosis and therapy, it is usually necessary to pursue lower light dose and less drug dose to minimize adverse reactions of patients on the premise of PDT effectiveness. Thrillingly, compared with the traditional phototherapeutic laser source, the novel 450-nm laser can more appropriately combine with porphyrin photosensitizer and play a better PDT effect in a variety of tumors under lower light doses and drugs, including gastric cancer, bladder cancer, kidney cancer, and colon cancer (unpublished data). However, it is worth noting that the photodynamic effect is based on the number of photons absorbed by the photosensitizer, which depends on the spectral overlap between the output power of the light source and the optical absorption spectrum of the photosensitizer [28]. Although the novel 450-nm laser is more suitable for the light absorption spectrum of porphyrin photosensitizer, the light dose in clinical photodynamic diagnosis and therapy should be determined by the actual number of photons absorbed, which is helpful to accurately evaluate and compare the PDT effect of different light sources or photosensitizers. In addition, as mentioned above, the 450-nm laser was primarily developed for vaporization and cutting in surgery and also had favorable organizational penetration [26]. If a photosensitizer is given at the same time as a 450-nm laser is used to resect the superficial tumors, the invisible tumor or carcinoma in situ will be killed by the photodynamic effect. We are now performing the single-center clinical trial to evaluate these effects on early gastric cancer and bladder cancer.

More importantly, in addition to producing ROS to directly kill tumor cells, PDT can trigger both humoral and cellular immunity responses by inducing the body to produce a variety of cytokines [44, 45]. Moreover, PDT also has been proven to induce the immunogenic cell death (ICD) of tumor cells through promoting the endogenous antigen release of dying cells and stimulating the activation and infiltration of antigen-specific T cells, as well as their proliferation [46]. In our study, we compared the effects of 450-nm and 630-nm laser-induced PDT in vivo. Interestingly, 450-nm laser-mediated PDT significantly inhibited tumor growth when compared with a 630-nm laser which was known to have a better tissue penetration depth. So, does 450-nm laser-mediated PDT induce more ICD than 630 nm? How does 450-nm laser-mediated PDT simulate the immune response? Further more in-depth studies are needed to solve those questions.

Conclusions

Collectively, our results showed that the combination of the novel 450-nm laser and photosensitizer DVDMS could generate a stronger photodynamic effect by activating autophagy to trigger apoptosis via regulation of the ROS/PI3K/Akt/mTOR molecular signaling pathway. Our study provides scientific experimental evidence that the novel 450-nm laser-mediated DVDMS-based PDT might be an alternative novel therapeutic strategy for GC in the future.

Availability of data and materials

All data supporting the study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. The datasets generated and used in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

1O2 :

Singlet oxygen

3-MA:

3-Methyladenine

5-ALA:

5-Aminolevulinic acid

BL:

Blue laser

CCK-8:

Cell Counting Kit-8

CQ:

Chloroquine

DCFH-DA:

2′',7′'-Dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate

DEGs:

Differentially expressed genes

DMPO:

5,5-Dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide

DVDMS:

Sinoporphyrin sodium

EdU:

5-Ethynyl-2′’-deoxyuridine

ER:

Endoplasmic reticulum

ESR:

Electron spin resonance

GC:

Gastric cancer

GSEA:

Gene set enrichment analysis

H&E:

Hematoxylin and eosin

ICD:

Immunogenic cell death

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

LDC:

Light dose correction

MFI:

Mean fluorescence intensity

MPPa:

Pyropheophorbide-α methyl ester

NAC:

N-Acetylcysteine

·OH:

Hydroxyl radicals

PDT:

Photodynamic therapy

PFA:

Paraformaldehyde

PI:

Propidium iodide

RL:

Red laser

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

SD:

Standard deviation

TEM:

Transmission electron microscopy

TEMP:

2,2,6,6-Tetramethyl-4-piperidone

VP:

Verteporfin

References

  1. Wu H, Fu M, Liu J, Chong W, Fang Z, Du F, et al. The role and application of small extracellular vesicles in gastric cancer. Mol Cancer. 2021;20(1):71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Qin Y, Tong X, Fan J, Liu Z, Zhao R, Zhang T, et al. Global burden and trends in incidence, mortality, and disability of stomach cancer from 1990 to 2017. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2021;12(10):e00406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jin GF, Lv J, Yang M, Wang MY, Zhu M, Wang TOP, et al. Genetic risk, incident gastric cancer, and healthy lifestyle: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies and prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(10):1378–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang TY, Cai H, Sasazuki S, Tsugane S, Zheng W, Cho ER, et al. Fruit and vegetable consumption, Helicobacter pylori antibodies, and gastric cancer risk: a pooled analysis of prospective studies in China, Japan, and Korea. Int J Cancer. 2017;140(3):591–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Joshi SS, Badgwell BD. Current treatment and recent progress in gastric cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):264–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rausei S, Lianos GD. Treatment of gastric cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(9):2627.

  8. Fornaro L, Vasile E, Aprile G, Goetze TO, Vivaldi C, Falcone A, et al. Locally advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer: recent therapeutic advances and research directions. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;69:90–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rabenstein T, May A, Gossner L, Manner H, Pech O, Gunter E, et al. Invisible gastric carcinoma detected by random biopsy: long-term results after photodynamic therapy. Endoscopy. 2008;40(11):899–904.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Raab O. Uber die wirkung fluoreszierender stoffe auf infusorien. Z Biol. 1900;39:524–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Li WP, Yen CJ, Wu BS, Wong TW. Recent advances in photodynamic therapy for deep-seated tumors with the aid of nanomedicine. Biomedicines. 2021;9(1):69.

  12. Lan M, Zhao S, Liu W, Lee CS, Zhang W, Wang P. Photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8(13):e1900132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Agostinis P, Berg K, Cengel KA, Foster TH, Girotti AW, Gollnick SO, et al. Photodynamic therapy of cancer: an update. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(4):250–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oinuma T, Nakamura T, Nishiwaki Y. Report on the national survey of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for gastric cancer in Japan (a secondary publication). Laser Ther. 2016;25(2):87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma CH, Ma HH, Deng XB, Yu R, Song KW, Wei KK, et al. Photodynamic therapy in combination with chemotherapy, targeted, and immunotherapy as a successful therapeutic approach for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: a case report and literature review. Photobiomod Photomed. 2022;40(5):308–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Casas A. Clinical uses of 5-aminolaevulinic acid in photodynamic treatment and photodetection of cancer: a review. Cancer Lett. 2020;490:165–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang J, Jiang C, Figueiro Longo JP, Azevedo RB, Zhang H, Muehlmann LA. An updated overview on the development of new photosensitizers for anticancer photodynamic therapy. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2018;8(2):137–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang XB, Hu JM, Wang P, Zhang SL, Liu YC, Xiong WL, et al. Analysis of the in vivo and in vitro effects of photodynamic therapy on breast cancer by using a sensitizer, sinoporphyrin sodium. Theranostics. 2015;5(7):772–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shi R, Li C, Jiang ZH, Li WF, Wang AP, Wei JF. Preclinical study of antineoplastic sinoporphyrin sodium-PDT via in vitro and in vivo models. Molecules. 2017;22(1):112.

  20. Xiong WL, Wang XB, Hu JM, Liu YC, Liu QH, Wang P. Comparative study of two kinds of repeated photodynamic therapy strategies in breast cancer by using a sensitizer, sinoporphyrin sodium. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2016;160:299–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu B, Li SX, Yu L, Hu W, Sheng DD, Hou J, et al. Inhibition of autophagy with chloroquine enhanced sinoporphyrin sodium mediated photodynamic therapy-induced apoptosis in human colorectal cancer cells. Int J Biol Sci. 2019;15(1):12–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu YC, Wang P, Liu QH, Wang XB. Sinoporphyrin sodium triggered sono-photodynamic effects on breast cancer both in vitro and in vivo. Ultrason Sonochem. 2016;31:437–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yano S, Hirohara S, Obata M, Hagiya Y, Ogura S, Ikeda A, et al. Current states and future views in photodynamic therapy. J Photoch Photobio C. 2011;12(1):46–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brown SB, Brown EA, Walker I. The present and future role of photodynamic therapy in cancer treatment. Lancet Oncol. 2004;5(8):497–508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jiang DL, Yang Z, Liu GX, Wu K, Fan J, Wu D, et al. A novel 450-nm blue laser system for surgical applications: efficacy of specific laser-tissue interactions in bladder soft tissue. Lasers Med Sci. 2019;34(4):807–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu X, Jiang DL, Liu GX, Wu K, Fan J, Wu D, et al. A novel 450 nm semiconductor blue laser system for application in colon endoscopic surgery: an ex vivo study of laser-tissue interactions. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2019;37(1):25–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu X, Jiang D, Liu G, Mu L, Zeng J, Yang L, et al. In vitro evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a high-power 450-nm semiconductor blue laser in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia. Lasers Med Sci. 2022;37(1):555–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schaberle FA. Assessment of the actual light dose in photodynamic therapy. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2018;23:75–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Thrift AP, El-Serag HB. Burden of gastric cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(3):534–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Collaborators GBDSC. The global, regional, and national burden of stomach cancer in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study 2017. Lancet. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(1):42–54.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ono H, Yao KS, Fujishiro M, Oda I, Uedo N, Nimura S, et al. Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer (second edition). Dig Endosc. 2021;33(1):4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Choi IJ, Lee JH, Kim YI, Kim CG, Cho SJ, Lee JY, et al. Long-term outcome comparison of endoscopic resection and surgery in early gastric cancer meeting the absolute indication for endoscopic resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(2):333–341.e331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cats A, Jansen EPM, van Grieken NCT, Sikorska K, Lind P, Nordsmark M, et al. Chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy after surgery and preoperative chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer (CRITICS): an international, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(5):616–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Namikawa T, Yatabe T, Inoue K, Shuin T, Hanazaki K. Clinical applications of 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated fluorescence for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(29):8769–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nakamura T, Oinuma T, Yamagishi H, Masuyama H, Terano A. Evaluation of a novel high-resolution magnifying videoendoscope that is capable of photodynamic diagnosis and therapy for gastric cancer. Photodiagn Photodyn. 2015;12(1):115–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhou Z, Song J, Nie L, Chen X. Reactive oxygen species generating systems meeting challenges of photodynamic cancer therapy. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45(23):6597–626.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhao L, Li J, Su Y, Yang L, Chen L, Qiang L, et al. MTH1 inhibitor amplifies the lethality of reactive oxygen species to tumor in photodynamic therapy. Sci Adv. 2020;6(10):eaaz0575.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Dewaele M, Martinet W, Rubio N, Verfaillie T, de Witte PA, Piette J, et al. Autophagy pathways activated in response to PDT contribute to cell resistance against ROS damage. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15(6):1402–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhou J, Li XY, Liu YJ, Feng J, Wu Y, Shen HM, et al. Full-coverage regulations of autophagy by ROS: from induction to maturation. Autophagy. 2022;18(6):1240–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Scherz-Shouval R, Elazar Z. ROS, mitochondria and the regulation of autophagy. Trends Cell Biol. 2007;17(9):422–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Song C, Xu W, Wu H, Wang X, Gong Q, Liu C, et al. Photodynamic therapy induces autophagy-mediated cell death in human colorectal cancer cells via activation of the ROS/JNK signaling pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(10):938.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Mao W, Sun Y, Zhang H, Cao L, Wang J, He P. A combined modality of carboplatin and photodynamic therapy suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition and matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2)/MMP-9 expression in HEp-2 human laryngeal cancer cells via ROS-mediated inhibition of MEK/ERK signalling pathway. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;31(8):1697–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Huang LY, Lin HD, Chen Q, Yu LH, Bai DQ. MPPa-PDT suppresses breast tumor migration/invasion by inhibiting Akt-NF-kappa B-dependent MMP-9 expression via ROS. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Alzeibak R, Mishchenko TA, Shilyagina NY, Balalaeva IV, Vedunova MV, Krysko DV. Targeting immunogenic cancer cell death by photodynamic therapy: past, present and future. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(1):e001926.

  45. Tan L, Shen X, He Z, Lu Y. The role of photodynamic therapy in triggering cell death and facilitating antitumor immunology. Front Oncol. 2022;12:863107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lu Y, Xu F, Wang Y, Shi C, Sha Y, He G, et al. Cancer immunogenic cell death via photo-pyroptosis with light-sensitive Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase inhibitor conjugate. Biomaterials. 2021;278:121167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the time and energy contributed by all the researchers.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC No. 82073304 to JZ and 82172684 to DLH), the Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi (No. 2021ZDLSF02-16 to DLH), and the National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2019YFC0121501 to DLH).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xing Li and Lijiang Gu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, 277 Yan-ta West Road, Xi’an, 710061, Shaanxi, China

    Xing Li, Lijiang Gu, Yuhang Chen, Yibo Mei, Jinlai Zhou, Minghai Ma, Jianbin Ma, Yue Chong, Xinyang Wang, Peng Guo, Dalin He & Jin Zeng

  2. Key Laboratory of Medicinal Resources and Natural Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Ministry of Education, National Engineering Laboratory for Resource Developing of Endangered Chinese Crude Drugs in Northwest of China, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, 710062, Shaanxi, China

    Xiaobing Wang

  3. Key Laboratory for Tumor Precision Medicine of Shaanxi Province, Xi’an, 710061, Shaanxi, China

    Xinyang Wang, Peng Guo, Dalin He & Jin Zeng

  4. Oncology Research Lab, Key Laboratory of Environment and Genes Related to Diseases, Ministry of Education, Xi’an, 710061, Shaanxi, China

    Xinyang Wang, Peng Guo, Dalin He & Jin Zeng

Authors
  1. Xing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lijiang Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuhang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaobing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yibo Mei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jinlai Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Minghai Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jianbin Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yue Chong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xinyang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Peng Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Dalin He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jin Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: XL, JZ, and DLH; methodology: XL, LJG, YHC, XBW, YBM, JLZ, MHM, JBM, PG, and JZ; data curation: XL, LJG, YHC, and YBM; formal analysis: XL, LJG, YHC, MHM, JBM, and JZ; investigation and project administration: XL, LJG, YHC, XBW, XYW, PG, JZ, and DLH; resources: JZ and DLH; software: XL, LJG, YHC, and YC; supervision: JZ and DLH; writing—original draft: XL, LJG, YHC, XBW, YBM, JLZ, JZ, and DLH; writing—review and editing: XL, LJG, YHC, XBW, YBM, JBM, XYW, PG, JZ, and DLH. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dalin He or Jin Zeng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The animal experimental protocols were approved by Xi’an Jiao Tong University (No: 2021-674), and all efforts were made to minimize the pain of animals and reduce the number of animals used in experiments.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Fig. S1.

Cellular uptake of DVDMS and cytotoxic effects of PDT in GC cells. (A and B) Representative fluorescence images and quantitative analysis of the intracellular uptake of DVDMS after different incubation time points. Scale bar = 10 μm. (n = 3, mean ± SD). (C) Photodynamic effect and cytotoxicity of DVDMS and 5-ALA on cells for 24 h. (n = 3, mean ± SD). (D and F) Colony formation test and quantitative analysis after treating with BL-PDT and RL-PDT. (n = 3, mean ± SD). (E) EdU assay after treating with BL-PDT and RL-PDT. Scale bar = 50 μm. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001. Fig. S2. Effects of PDT on ROS production in GC cells. (A) Representative fluorescence images of intracellular ROS detection after adding NAC (incubation 2 h). Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of the ROS amount in AGS cells after adding NAC (incubation 2 h). (n = 3, mean ± SD). (C) Viability test of GC cells after adding NAC (incubation 2 h). (n = 3, mean ± SD). (D) Colony formation test of GC cells after adding NAC (incubation 2 h). (E) EdU assay of GC cells after adding NAC (incubation 2 h). Scale bar = 50 μm. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001. Fig. S3. Apoptotic effects of 450 nm laser/DVDMS-mediated PDT on GC cells. (A and B) Heatmap and volcano plot of the DEGs in MGC803 cells between BL-PDT group vs. BL group. (C) GO enrichment analysis of the DEGs in MGC803 cells. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of the apoptosis in AGS cells after the treatment of 24 h. (n = 3, mean ± SD). (E) Western blotting analysis of the expression levels of apoptosis related proteins in AGS cells after the treatment of 24 h. (F) Quantitative analysis of (E). (n = 3, mean ± SD). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001. Fig. S4. 450 nm laser/DVDMS-mediated PDT induced autophagic cell death in GC cells. (A) Representative fluorescence images and quantitative analysis of autophagy dots in AGS cells after the treatment of 24 h. (n = 3, mean ± SD). Scale bar = 10 μm. (B) Typical TEM images of the autophagic vacuoles (indicated by the red arrow) in AGS cells after PDT for 24 h. (C) Western blotting analysis of the expression levels of autophagy related proteins after the treatment of 24 h. (n = 3, mean ± SD). (D) Western blotting analysis of the effect of inhibitor CQ for 4 h on autophagy in AGS cells. (n = 3, mean ± SD). (E) Western blotting analysis of the effect of inhibitor 3-MA for 12 h on autophagy in AGS cells. (n = 3, mean ± SD). (F) Representative fluorescence images and quantitative analysis of autophagy puncta after adding inhibitor 3-MA for 12 h in AGS cells. (n = 3, mean ± SD). Scale bar = 10 μm. (G) Western blotting analysis of the effect of autophagy on BL-PDT inducing apoptosis after adding inhibitor 3-MA in AGS cells. (n = 3, mean ± SD). (H) Viability test of GC cells after adding inhibitor 3-MA. (n = 3, mean ± SD). (I) Flow cytometry analysis of the apoptosis after adding inhibitor 3-MA in AGS cells. (n = 3, mean ± SD). (J) Flow cytometry analysis of the ROS amount in HGC27 cells with different treatments. (K) Quantitative analysis of (J). (n = 3, mean ± SD). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001. Fig. S5. Effects of 450 nm laser/DVDMS-mediated PDT on ROS/PI3K/Akt/ mTOR signaling pathway and histopathologic change of organs. (A) Western blotting analysis of the expression levels of pathway related proteins in AGS cells after the treatment of 24 h. (n = 3, mean ± SD). (B) TEM images of the autophagic vacuoles (indicated by the red arrow) after adding NAC in AGS cells. (C) Western blotting analysis of the expression levels of autophagy and pathway related proteins after adding LY294002, 740 Y-P and NAC in AGS cells. (D) Quantitative analysis of (C). (n = 3, mean ± SD). (E) H&E staining of vital organs of the mice after different treatments. Scale bar = 200 μm. (F) Representative photos of tumor bearing mice after treating with BL-PDT and RL-PDT. (G) Photographs of tumor tissues after treating with BL-PDT and RL-PDT. (H and I) Relative body weight and tumor volume changes of mice during different treatments. (J) Tumor weight changes after treating with BL-PDT and RL-PDT. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.

Additional file 2.

Original images of Western blotting results.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Gu, L., Chen, Y. et al. A novel 450-nm laser-mediated sinoporphyrin sodium-based photodynamic therapy induces autophagic cell death in gastric cancer through regulation of the ROS/PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. BMC Med 20, 475 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02676-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02676-8

Keywords

  • PDT
  • GC
  • ROS
  • Autophagy
  • Apoptosis

BMC Medicine

ISSN: 1741-7015

Contact us