Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Atorvastatin-pretreated mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles promote cardiac repair after myocardial infarction via shifting macrophage polarization by targeting microRNA-139-3p/Stat1 pathway

BMC Medicine volume 21, Article number: 96 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) pretreated with atorvastatin (ATV) (MSCATV-EV) have a superior cardiac repair effect on acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The mechanisms, however, have not been fully elucidated. This study aims to explore whether inflammation alleviation of infarct region via macrophage polarization plays a key role in the efficacy of MSCATV-EV.

Methods

MSCATV-EV or MSC-EV were intramyocardially injected 30 min after coronary ligation in AMI rats. Macrophage infiltration and polarization (day 3), cardiac function (days 0, 3, 7, 28), and infarct size (day 28) were measured. EV small RNA sequencing and bioinformatics analysis were conducted for differentially expressed miRNAs between MSCATV-EV and MSC-EV. Macrophages were isolated from rat bone marrow for molecular mechanism analysis. miRNA mimics or inhibitors were transfected into EVs or macrophages to analyze its effects on macrophage polarization and cardiac repair in vitro and in vivo.

Results

MSCATV-EV significantly reduced the amount of CD68+ total macrophages and increased CD206+ M2 macrophages of infarct zone on day 3 after AMI compared with MSC-EV group (P < 0.01–0.0001). On day 28, MSCATV-EV much more significantly improved the cardiac function than MSC-EV with the infarct size markedly reduced (P < 0.05–0.0001). In vitro, MSCATV-EV also significantly reduced the protein and mRNA expressions of M1 markers but increased those of M2 markers in lipopolysaccharide-treated macrophages (P < 0.05–0.0001). EV miR-139-3p was identified as a potential cardiac repair factor mediating macrophage polarization. Knockdown of miR-139-3p in MSCATV-EV significantly attenuated while overexpression of it in MSC-EV enhanced the effect on promoting M2 polarization by suppressing downstream signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (Stat1). Furthermore, MSCATV-EV loaded with miR-139-3p inhibitors decreased while MSC-EV loaded with miR-139-3p mimics increased the expressions of M2 markers and cardioprotective efficacy.

Conclusions

We uncovered a novel mechanism that MSCATV-EV remarkably facilitate cardiac repair in AMI by promoting macrophage polarization via miR-139-3p/Stat1 pathway, which has the great potential for clinical translation.

Peer Review reports

Background

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a life-threatening disease because of loss of cardiac muscles and its exceedingly limited capacity of regeneration. Stem cells, especially bone marrow stem cell transplantation, have been embraced as a potential alternative to repair the broken heart. Although animal studies showed an effective improvement in cardiac function of AMI models with the stem cell therapy [1, 2], the weak efficacy of therapeutic benefit have been observed in clinical trials [3,4,5], which suggests that the effects of stem cell therapy remain to be enhanced. In recent years, the paracrine effect has been regarded as an attributor of cardioprotection in stem cell therapy, which is mainly mediated by extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived by stem cells [6,7,8,9]. According to the MISEV2018 guideline, EVs are the generic term for particles naturally released from the cells, which are delimited by a lipid bilayer and cannot replicate [10]. Referring to their size, EV subtypes are classified as small EVs (sEVs) (< 100 nm or < 200 nm) and medium/large EVs (> 200 nm) [10]. EVs carry abundant cargo of mRNAs, non-coding RNAs such as microRNAs (miRNAs), proteins, lipids, etc., from their parent cells [10,11,12]. These bioactive molecules in EV cargo and their roles in cell-cell communication have stoked up interest in stem cell-derived EVs as potential therapeutic tools for ischemic heart injury and ischemic-reperfusion injury [13,14,15]. Cell-free therapy with EVs not only has shown similar effects as stem cells in cardiac repair for AMI [16,17,18] but also has several advantages over cells, including product stability, immune tolerability, effectiveness through systemic delivery, and capability of crossing the blood-brain barrier [19]. However, the weak effectiveness of cell-free therapy still remains to be the main limitation as same as stem cell therapy itself is [20].

Our previous studies have found that mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation based on the pleiotropic effects of atorvastatin (ATV) can improve heart function after AMI [21,22,23,24,25]. ATV-pretreated MSCs (MSCATV) also enhanced the effect of cardiac repair [26]. The combination of ATV treatment with MSCATV further augmented the therapeutic efficacy [23, 27]. Moreover, EVs derived from MSCATV (MSCATV-EV) alone [28] or in combination with MSCATV [29] remarkably enhanced heart function and minimized infarct size due to angiogenesis via the upregulated lncRNA H19 in EVs. Besides H19, miRNAs may also be induced by ATV and exert an important role in the cardiac repair process of MSCATV-EV. Therefore, we extend our work by further exploring the probable key roles of miRNAs contained in MSCATV-EV in cardiac repair for AMI. Likewise, macrophages polarization have drawn much attention recently on their plasticity in ischemic heart disease [30, 31]. In the early stage of AMI, pro-inflammatory macrophages (M1) are the predominant subtype and responsible for cell debris clearance, while in the later stage, M2 macrophages start to take responsibility for the healing process of infarcted myocardium [32,33,34,35]. It is a promising strategy to modulate and balance macrophage polarization for healing the infarcted myocardium. Furthermore, we hypothesized that miRNAs in MSCATV-EV might mediate the beneficial macrophage polarization in the setting of AMI.

This study aims to detect and screen the differentially expressed miRNAs in MSCATV-EV through EV small RNA sequencing, and to explore the important roles of the key miRNAs in shifting macrophage polarization for myocardial repair after AMI. We found that EV transfer of miR-139-3p by MSCATV-EV into macrophages targeted to inhibit signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (Stat1) expression and activation to promote M2 macrophage polarization, remarkably enhancing the efficacy of cardiac repair for AMI.

Methods

Detailed descriptions of experimental procedures are available in the Additional file 1: Supplementary data [23, 28, 29, 36].

Primary cell isolation and culture

Rat bone marrow-derived MSCs

Bone marrow-derived MSCs were isolated as described previously [28]. Briefly, femurs and tibias from male Sprague-Dawley rats (60–80 g) were flushed with Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium (IMDM, Invitrogen, USA) to collect total bone marrow cells, which were then cultured with IMDM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, USA). The medium was changed every 3 days along with non-adherent cells removed. MSCs were passaged when reached 80% to 90% confluence. MSCs at passages 3–4 were used for the study. For ATV pretreatment, MSCs were treated with 1 μmol/L ATV (Sigma, USA) in IMDM containing 10% FBS for 24 h. The concentration of ATV is based on our previous study [28]. The control groups were treated with equal volumes of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Then, cells were washed with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) three times and cultured with fresh FBS-free IMDM for another 48 h. The conditioned supernatant was collected for EV isolation.

Rat bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs)

Total bone marrow cells were harvested by the same method and cultured with complete Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium containing 20 ng/mL recombinant macrophage colony stimulating factor (CSF) (PeproTech) [37]. Six days later, the differentiated macrophages (BMDMs) were generated and then incubated with 100 ng/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to induce M1 populations or with 10 ng/mL interleukin (IL)-4 plus 10 ng/ml IL-13 to induce M2 populations for at least 24 h [37, 38]. For EV incubation experiments, we used three different concentrations (2 μg/mL, 20 μg/mL, 40 μg/mL) of MSC-derived EVs (MSC-EV) or MSCATV-EV to treat BMDMs for 24 h and then examined the expression of M2 macrophage marker to select an optimal concentration. To better mimic the inflammatory microenvironment of infarcted hearts, we further stimulated BMDMs with 100 ng/mL LPS for 6 h and then incubated the cells with the optimal concentration of MSC-EV or MSCATV-EV for another 48 h.

EV isolation

We used differential centrifugation to isolate EVs as described before [28, 39]. In brief, after MSCs were treated with ATV for 24 h and/or transfected with miR-139-3p mimics or inhibitors for 10 h, the conditioned medium was harvested for further centrifugation. Every step of centrifugation was under 4 °C condition. The conditioned medium was first centrifuged at 300 g for 10 min and then 2000 g for 20 min to remove cells and debris, which was followed by centrifugation at 16500 g for 30 min to remove macrovesicles. Then, the supernatant was ultracentrifuged twice at 120,000 g for 70 min. The final EV pellets were resuspended with 50–100 μL PBS and stored at – 80 °C. MicroBCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA) was used to test the protein concentrations of EVs.

Rat AMI model

In vivo, animal experiments were performed on 6- to 8-week-old littermate male Sprague-Dawley rats. To induce AMI model, rats were anesthetized, ventilated via tracheal intubations connected to a rodent ventilator, and then performed with a thoracotomy to expose the heart [17, 28]. The left anterior descending coronary artery was ligated with a 6-0 silk suture. The induction of AMI was verified by color change to pale in the region below the ligation site. Thirty minutes later, various EVs (105 μg, in 100 μL PBS) or an equivalent volume of PBS were injected at three different points around the border zone of infarction [28]. The concentration of EVs used in our animal experiments refers to the report by de Couto et al. [17]. All animal studies were approved by the Fuwai Hospital Experimental Animals Ethics Committee, which complies with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals. The ARRIVE guidelines were followed (Additional file 2).

Cardiac function measurements

Transthoracic echocardiography imaging system (Vevo 2000, Visual Sonics, Toronto, Canada) was used with two-dimensional M-mode analysis to evaluate rat cardiac function at baseline (before AMI, day 0), and days 3, 7, and 28 after AMI. Three consecutive cycles for each animal and time point were captured to measure left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESd) and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDd). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), and left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) were calculated and then averaged as previously described [26].

Histological analysis

On days 3, 7, and 28 after AMI, animals were anesthetized with isoflurane to harvest hearts for histological analysis. The animal hearts were arrested in diastole by perfusing with 5% KCl. Heart tissues in the upper part of ligation were excised. The hearts were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 4 μm-thick serial sections. The heart tissue sections were stained with Masson’s trichrome kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (Sigma) to evaluate the infarct size and myocardial fibrosis. The percentage of infarct area was calculated by the ratio of fibrotic area (blue) to entire LV cross-sectional area measured by the Image J software (Version 1.52a).

EV small RNA sequencing

MSC-EV and MSCATV-EV were isolated. The isolation of total RNA in the EVs, small RNA library construction, and EV small RNA sequencing were conducted by RiboBio Company (Guangzhou, China). Briefly, total RNAs of EVs were extracted by HiPure Liquid RNA/miRNA Kit (Magen, Guangzhou, China). The RNAs were ligated with 3′ and 5′ adapter at first, then reverse transcribed to cDNA and further amplified by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The PCR products were purified by electrophoresis following instructions of NEBNext® Multiplex Small RNA Library Prep Set for Illumina® (NEB, USA). The purified small RNA library products were evaluated by Qubit®2.0 (Life Technologies, USA) or Agilent 2200 TapeStation (Agilent Technologies, USA) and sequenced using Illumina HiSeq™ 2500 platform.

Raw reads of the small RNA sequencing were filtered by removal of the adapters, poly ‘N’, reads with less than 17 nucleotide or low quality, etc., to obtain the clean reads. The clean reads were aligned to rat reference genome to map the whole genome distribution and to several non-coding RNA (ncRNA) databases (miRBase, Rfam, and piRNABank) to annotate various ncRNA (miRNA, rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, snoRNA, Y_RNA and piRNA) [40,41,42]. miRNA expressions were calculated by reads per million (RPM) values: RPM = (number of reads mapping to miRNA/number of reads in clean data) × 106. Differential miRNA expression between two sets of samples was calculated by edgeR algorithm according to the criteria of |log2(Fold Change)| ≥ 1 and P value < 0.05. TargetScan, miRDB, miRTarBase, and miRWalk were used to predict targets gene of selected miRNA and to do further gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis.

miRNA transfections

Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, USA), miRNA mimics, or inhibitors (GenePharma, Shanghai) were diluted with opti-MEM respectively. Then, mix the diluted lipofectamine 3000 with miRNA mimics or inhibitors and incubate them in room temperature for 20 min. Add the mixture into medium of cultured MSCs or BMDMs for 10 h to obtain MSC-EV-miR mimic or MSCATV-EV-miR inhibitor as described above for mechanistic experiments.

Statistical analysis

Data were presented with mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences of continuous variables among groups were tested by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Statistical analyses were carried out using the Graphpad Prism 7.0 software. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Characterization and optimal concentration of MSCATV-EV

MSCs were obtained from rat bone marrow and then pretreated with ATV for 24 h to isolate MSCATV-EV (Fig. 1A). Flow cytometry showed the isolated passage 3-4 rat MSCs highly expressed surface markers CD29 and CD90 with no difference in morphology after treatment with ATV or DMSO (Fig. 1B, C). The cell viability of MSC or MSCATV was in a similarly good condition after 72 h treatment (Additional file 3: Fig. S1). MSC-derived EVs displayed a cup-shaped membrane structure under transmission electron microscopy with a diameter of 100–200 nm (Fig. 1D), which are classified as sEVs, and expressed the marker proteins Alix, CD63, TSG101, and CD81 (Fig. 1E) [43].

Fig. 1
figure 1

The characterization of atorvastatin-pretreated bone marrow MSC-derived EVs (MSCATV-EV) in rats. A The schematic protocol of EVs isolated from rat bone marrow MSCs with or without ATV pretreatment. B Flow cytometry analysis of surface markers on rat bone marrow MSCs. C Morphology of MSCs treated with DMSO or ATV under the microscope. D Transmission electron microscopy scanning for the morphology of EVs. E Western blot analysis for the protein markers of EVs. F Western blot analysis for the protein expressions of Arg1 (a marker of M2 macrophages) and iNOS (a marker of M1 macrophages) in rat BMDMs treated with different concentrations (2 μg/mL, 20 μg/mL, 40 μg/mL) of MSC-EV or MSCATV-EV for 24 h. G Western blot analysis for the protein expressions of Arg1 and iNOS in rat BMDMs stimulated with LPS for 6 h and then incubated with 40 μg/mL MSC-EV or MSCATV-EV for another 48 h. Arg1, arginase 1; ATV, atorvastatin; BMDMs, bone marrow-derived macrophages; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; EV, extracellular vesicle; IMDM, Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells

Full size image

To determine the effective concentration of EVs in vivo, we used different concentrations (2 μg/mL, 20 μg/mL, 40 μg/mL) of MSC-EV or MSCATV-EV to treat rat BMDMs for 24 h. The results of western blot showed that 40 μg/mL MSCATV-EV significantly increased the protein expression of arginase 1 (Arg1, a marker of M2 macrophages [38]) and decreased that of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS, a marker of M1 macrophages [38]) (Fig. 1F). To simulate the inflammatory microenvironment during myocardial infarction, we further stimulated BMDMs with 100 ng/mL LPS for 6 h and then treated the cells with 40 μg/mL MSC-EV or MSCATV-EV for another 48 h. The results showed that MSCATV-EV more significantly increased the protein expression of Arg1 and decreased that of iNOS than MSC-EV (Fig. 1G). Therefore, we chose the latter protocol with an EV concentration of 40 μg/mL in the following macrophage polarization experiments.

The effects of MSCATV-EV on enhancing cardiac function and promoting M2 macrophage polarization in AMI hearts

AS shown in Fig. 2A, B and Additional file 1: Table S1, MSCATV-EV significantly enhanced both LVEF and LVFS values compared with both groups of MSC-EV and AMI (52.89 ± 5.40% vs. 29.31 ± 2.64% and 21.66% ± 1.54%, 37.70 ± 2.73% vs. 24.86 ± 2.10% and 17.95% ± 2.33%, respectively; all P < 0.0001) on day 28 post-AMI with both of LVESV and LVEDV significantly reduced (all P < 0.0001). MSCATV-EV also significantly diminished infarct size in comparison with both groups of MSC-EV and AMI (10.22 ± 2.82% vs. 18.12 ± 4.64% and 30.06% ± 6.84%, P < 0.05 and P <0.0001, respectively) on day 28 (Fig. 2C, D). These results indicated that MSCATV-EV were able to improve cardiac function, attenuate left ventricular remodeling, and reduce the infarct size much more effectively than MSC-EV.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The superior effects of MSCATV-EV on ventricular function, MI size, macrophage infiltration and M2 polarization in AMI rats. A Representative M-mode echocardiogram of each group on day 28 after AMI. B The dynamic changes in LVEF, LVFS, LVESV, and LVEDV of each group on days 0, 3, 7, 28 after AMI, n = 6–7 per group. C Representatives of heart cross sections with Masson trichrome staining on day 28. D Quantification of infarct size of each group in C, n = 6–7 per group. E Representative confocal images of CD68+ or CD206+ macrophages within the infarct border zone on day 3 post-AMI. F Quantification of CD68+ or CD206+ macrophages in E, n = 6-7 per group. G Western blot analysis of iNOS and Arg1 expressions in infarcted myocardium of each group. H Quantification of iNOS and Arg1 expressions in G, n = 3 per group. I The mRNA expressions of M1 (iNOS, IL-12, TNF-α) and M2 (Arg1, IL-10, CD206) macrophage markers in infarcted zone measured by qPCR, n = 3–4 per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. Arg1, arginase 1; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; ATV, atorvastatin; EV, extracellular vesicle; IL, interleukin; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; LVEDV, left ventricular end diastolic volume; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESV, left ventricular end-systolic volume; LVFS, left ventricular fractional shortening; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha

Full size image

To explore whether MSCATV-EV treatment affects the accumulation and polarization of macrophages, we labeled total macrophages with CD68 and M2 macrophages with CD206 in the infarcted region on day 3 post-AMI by immunofluorescence. The results showed that MSCATV-EV significantly decreased the CD68+ macrophage infiltration within the infarct border zone compared with both MSC-EV and AMI groups (both P < 0.0001) with CD206+ (M2) macrophages infiltration significantly increased (P < 0.01–0.0001) (Fig. 2E, F; Additional file 1: Table S1). Next, we detected the protein and mRNA expressions of M1 and M2 macrophage markers in the infarcted myocardium. Compared with both groups of MSC-EV and AMI, MSCATV- EV significantly increased the protein expression of Arg1 but decreased that of iNOS (P < 0.05–0.01) (Fig. 2G, H; Additional file 1: Table S1). Furthermore, the mRNA expressions of Arg1, IL-10, and CD206 were also more significantly elevated and those of iNOS, IL-12, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) more significantly attenuated in MSCATV-EV group than both groups of MSC-EV and AMI (P < 0.05–0.001) (Fig. 2I; Additional file 1: Table S1). These results suggested that MSCATV-EV not only significantly reduced macrophage infiltration but also increased the proportion of M2 macrophages in the acute phase of the AMI region.

MSCATV-EV potently transformed M1 macrophages to M2 phenotype in vitro

In vitro, we first examined the internalization of MSC-EV or MSCATV-EV by rat BMDMs. Immunocytochemistry images showed that BMDMs efficiently internalized PKH67-labeled MSC-EV or MSCATV-EV at 4 h after incubation (Fig. 3A). High-content screening system dynamically observed the intake of EVs by BMDM (Additional file 4: Supplementary Video). Then, we induced M1 and M2 macrophage phenotypes to compare the effects of MSCATV-EV and MSC-EV on macrophage polarization. Compared with control group, the significantly elevated protein and/or mRNA expressions of iNOS, IL-12, or TNF-α in M1 group (all P < 0.0001) represented the successful formation of M1 macrophage model in vitro, and those of Arg1, IL-10, or CD206 in M2 group (all P < 0.0001) suggested the formation of M2 macrophage model (Fig. 3B–D; Additional file 1: Table S2). Furthermore, compared with M1 BMDMs group, the protein expression of Arg1 was significantly increased in both LPS+MSC- EV and LPS+MSCATV-EV BMDMs groups (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively) with the latter increased more than the former group (P < 0.01), while that of iNOS decreased only in the LPS+MSCATV-EV group (P < 0.001) indicating more potent effect of MSCATV-EV than MSC-EV on M1 to M2 macrophage polarization (Fig. 3B, C; Additional file 1: Table S2). Similarly, LPS+MSCATV-EV also more significantly elevated the mRNA expressions of M2 markers (Arg1, IL-10, and CD206; P < 0.01-0.001) but more significantly reduced those of M1 markers (iNOS, IL-12, and TNF-α; all P < 0.05) than LPS+MSC-EV, (Fig. 3D; Additional file 1: Table S2). These data suggested that MSCATV-EV more efficiently shifted macrophage polarization from M1 to M2 than MSC-EV in vitro.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The effects of MSCATV-EV and MSC-EV on macrophage polarization shifts in vitro. A PKH-67 labeled MSCATV-EV or MSC-EV (green) intake by rat BMDMs (red). B Western blot analysis for protein expressions of iNOS and Arg1 in BMDMs. C Quantification of iNOS and Arg1 expressions in B, n = 3 per group. D qPCR analysis for mRNA expressions of macrophage markers (M1: iNOS, IL-12, TNF-α; M2: Arg1, IL-10, CD206) in BMDMs described in B, n = 4 per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. Arg1, arginase 1; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; ATV, atorvastatin; BMDMs, bone marrow-derived macrophages; EV, extracellular vesicle; IL, interleukin; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha

Full size image

MSCATV-EV have a distinct miRNA signature

The RNA cargo of EVs varies with cell origin and environmental stimulus and alters recipient cell function [13]. To reveal the miRNA profiles in MSCATV- EV and understand how they modulate macrophage polarization, we performed small RNA sequencing on MSCATV-EV and MSC-EV. The molecule size ranges of RNA samples from MSCATV-EV and MSC-EV were established by Agilent 2200 TapeStation Instrument (Additional file 5: Fig. S2). ncRNA annotation showed that the read accounts mapping to diverse types of ncRNA were similar between MSCATV- EV and MSC- EV; most reads mapped to tRNA, piRNA, and rRNA, while fewer reads mapped to miRNA, snRNA, and snoRNA, etc. (Additional file 6: Fig. S3; Additional file 1: Table S3). We dug into the reads that aligned to miRNA annotations. Differential expression analysis found three upregulated (miR-139-3p, miR-320-3p, miR-501-3p) and six downregulated known mature miRNAs (miR-200c-3p, miR-205, miR-340-3p, let-7f-5p, let-7a-1-3p, let-7c-2-3p) in MSCATV-EV compared with MSC-EV (Fig. 4A, B; Additional file 1: Table S4). qPCR analysis validated the significantly differential expressions of these nine miRNAs between MSCATV-EV and MSC-EV (Fig. 4C; Additional file 1: Table S4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Small RNA sequencing analysis identifies miR-139-3p as an extracellular vesicle miRNA candidate. A, B Hierarchical clustering heat map (A) and volcano plot (B) showing 9 differentially expressed miRNAs between MSC-EV and MSCATV–EV. C Verification for the mRNA expressions in MSC-EV and MSCATV–EV by qPCR analysis, n = 3–4 per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. D, E GO (D) and KEGG (E) enrichment analysis of target genes of three upregulated miRNAs (miR-139-3p, miR-320-3p, miR-501-3p) between MSC-EV and MSCATV–EV. F Interaction network between target genes of three upregulated miRNAs (miR-139-3p, miR-320-3p, miR-501-3p) and upregulated genes in patients suffered from first acute myocardial infarction (GEO: GSE24591). G Interaction network between target genes of three upregulated miRNAs (miR-139-3p, miR-320-3p, miR-501-3p) and downregulated genes in human monocyte-derived M2 macrophages (GEO: GSE32164). H The intersection between the three upregulated miRNAs of miR-139-3p, miR-320-3p, miR-501-3p, and 25 downregulated miRNAs in patients suffered from first acute myocardial infarction (GEO: GSE24591) is miR-139-3p. ATV, atorvastatin; EV, extracellular vesicle; GEO, gene expression omnibus; GO, gene ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; miRNA, micro-RNA; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction

Full size image

To screen a miRNA that is both cardioprotective and polarization-related, we predicted target genes of the three upregulated miRNAs (miR-139-3p, miR-320-3p, miR-501-3p) using TargetScan, miRDB, miRTarBase, and miRWalk. GO and KEGG functional analysis on the target genes enriched in multiple pathways such as establishment or maintenance of cell polarity, angiogenesis, apoptosis, autophagy, and phagocytosis, etc. (Fig. 4D, E). Next, we retrieved two human datasets in the gene expression omnibus (GEO) database: GSE24591, a gene and miRNA expression profiling of patients affected by first AMI; GSE32164, a gene expression profiling of human monocyte-derived macrophage polarization. Comparing the target genes of the three miRNAs with the upregulated genes of AMI patients (GSE24591), we noticed that many of the target genes were upregulated in AMI patients relative to normal people (Fig. 4F; Additional file 7: Fig. S4). These results suggest that miR-139-3p, miR-320-3p, and miR-501-3p might be potential cardioprotective factors. Then, we compared the target genes with downregulated genes in human M2 macrophages (GSE32164). The results showed that multiple target genes of the three miRNAs were downregulated in human M2 macrophages, which implies miR-139-3p, miR-320-3p, and miR-501-3p possibly correlate with M2 polarization (Fig. 4G, Additional file 8: Fig. S5). To determine the most significant miRNA to study, we compared three upregulated miRNAs in MSCATV-EV with 25 downregulated miRNAs in AMI patients (GSE24591) (Additional file 1: Table S5). Intriguingly, miR-139-3p stood out as the only one in their intersection (Fig. 4H). We searched another MI dataset GSE123342 to validate and also found that the expression of miR-139 decreased in AMI patients (Additional file 1: Table S6). Additional file 9: Fig. S6 showed the consensus sequence of miR-139 in miRNA-seq of MSC-EV and MSCATV-EV mapped to rno-miR-139. These data indicate that miR-139-3p, upregulated in MSCATV-EV, is likely to be a cardioprotective factor in AMI and promote M2 polarization.

miR-139-3p is a mediator of MSCATV-EV -modulated M2 macrophage polarization by targeting Stat1 in vitro

To investigate the effect of EV miR-139-3p on macrophage polarization, we knocked down and overexpressed miR-139-3p in MSCs with or without ATV pretreatment, isolated corresponding EVs of MSCATV-EV-miR inhibitor and MSC-EV-miR mimic, and incubated LPS-stimulated BMDMs with these EVs (Fig. 5A). Compared with LPS+MSCATV-EV or LPS+MSCATV-EV-NC inhibitor group, the protein expression of Arg1 in BMDMs was reduced but that of iNOS increased in LPS+MSCATV-EV-miR inhibitor group; in contrast, LPS+MSC-EV-miR mimic treatment significantly enhanced the protein expression of Arg1 and attenuated that of iNOS in BMDMs relative to LPS+MSC-EV-NC mimic group (Fig. 5B, C; Additional file 1: Table S7). Similarly, knockdown of miR-139-3p in MSCATV-EV decreased the mRNA expression of Arg1, IL-10, and CD206 but increased that of iNOS, IL-12, and TNF-α in LPS-stimulated BMDMs, while overexpression of miR-139-3p in MSC-EV elevated the mRNA expression of Arg1, IL-10, and CD206 but reduced that of iNOS, IL-12, and TNF-α (Fig. 5D; Additional file 1: Table S7). Furthermore, we directly transfected LPS-induced BMDMs with miR-139-3p mimic (Fig. 5E). Compared with M1 group, miR-139-3p mimic significantly increased the protein or mRNA expression of Arg1, IL-10, and CD206 but decreased that of iNOS, IL-12, and TNF-α in BMDMs (Fig. 5F–H; Additional file 1: Table S8). These results proved that upregulated miR-139-3p mediates MSCATV-EV function on promoting M2 polarization.

Fig. 5
figure 5

miR-139-3p is an effector of MSCATV–EV-mediated macrophage polarization by targeting Stat1 in vitro. A Schematic protocol of isolating MSCATV-EV-miR inhibitor and MSC-EV-miR mimic and incubating LPS-pretreated rat BMDMs. B The protein expressions of macrophage M1 marker iNOS and M2 marker Arg1 in the BMDMs as described in A. C Quantification of iNOS and Arg1 expressions in B, n = 3 per group. D qPCR analysis for the mRNA expressions of macrophage markers (M1: iNOS, IL-12, TNF-α; M2: Arg1, IL-10, CD206) in the BMDMs described in A, n = 3–4 per group. E Schematic protocol of miR-139-3p mimics being directly transfected into LPS-pretreated BMDMs. F The protein expressions of macrophage M1 marker iNOS and M2 marker Arg1 in the BMDMs described in E. G Quantification of iNOS and Arg1 expressions in F, n = 3 per group. H qPCR analysis for the mRNA expressions of macrophage markers (M1: iNOS, IL-12, TNF-α; M2: Arg1, IL-10, CD206) in the BMDMs described in E, n = 3–4 per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. I, J The protein expression of Stat1 in rat BMDMs transfected with miR-139-3p mimics or inhibitors, n = 3 per group. K, L The protein expressions of iNOS, Arg1, and phosphorylated Stat1 in BMDMs stimulated with LPS and transfected with miR-139-3p mimics or inhibitors, n = 3 per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. Arg1, arginase 1; ATV, atorvastatin; BMDMs, bone marrow-derived macrophages; EV, extracellular vesicle; IL, interleukin; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; miR, micro-RNA; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; Stat1, signal transducer and activator of transcription 1; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha

Full size image

To identify the target genes of miR-139-3p in MSCATV-EV-treated macrophages, we predicted them in miRWalk, TargetScan, miRDB, and miRTarBase. Notably, TargetScan predicted that Stat1 is a possible target gene of miR-139-3p (Additional file 10: Fig. S7A; Additional file 1: Table S9). As is well known, Stat1 activation drives M1 macrophage polarization [44]. We further performed the luciferase reporter assay to verify the pairing of miR-139-3p and 3′UTR target region of Stat1 transcript. The results showed that miR-139-3p mimic decreased luciferase activity in Stat1 wild type 3′UTR group but had no effect in Stat1 mutated 3′UTR group (Additional file 10: Fig. S7B). We also transfected BMDMs with miR-139-3p mimic or inhibitor. miR-139-3p mimic decreased the protein expression of total Stat1 compared with control or miR-139-3p inhibitor group (Fig. 5I, J; Additional file 1: Table S10). Besides, miR-139-3p mimic significantly attenuated LPS-induced elevation of Stat1 phosphorylation with expression of iNOS decreased while expression of Arg1 increased in BMDMs (Fig. 5K, L; Additional file 1: Table S11). These data suggested that miR-139-3p promotes M2 macrophage polarization by suppressing the expression and activation of Stat1 in macrophages.

miR-139-3p in MSCATV-EV confers cardioprotection in AMI rats

To validate whether EVmiR-139-3p mediates the cardioprotective effects of MSCATV-EV in vivo, we transfected MSCATV-EV with miR-139-3p inhibitor (MSCATV-EV-miR inhibitor) and MSC-EV with miR-139-3p mimic (MSC-EV-miR mimic), then injected them into infarct border zone of myocardium 30 min after AMI in rats. As shown in Fig. 6 and Additional file 1: Table S12, on day 3 post-AMI, MSCATV-EV-miR inhibitor significantly increased the total macrophage marker of CD68+ and decreased the M2 marker of CD206+ in the border zone compared with both groups of MSCATV-EV and MSC-EV-miR mimic (P < 0.01–0.0001) (Fig. 6A, D). On day 28 after AMI, MSCATV-EV-miR inhibitor significantly reduced the cardiac function of LVEF compared with both groups of MSCATV-EV and MSC-EV-miR mimic (P < 0.01 and 0.05) (Fig. 6B, E), while significantly increased the infarct size compared with MSCATV-EV group (20.27 ± 2.78% vs. 10.41 ± 2.76%, P < 0.01) but not significantly with MSC-EV-miR mimic group (20.27 ± 2.78% vs. 14.24 ± 2.55%, P = no significance) (Fig. 6C, F). Furthermore, MSCATV-EV as well as MSC-EV-miR mimic both significantly upregulated the protein expression of Arg1 (both P < 0.05) but downregulated that of iNOS and phosphorylated Stat1 in comparison with AMI group (all P < 0.01–0.05). In contrast, knocking down miR-139-3p in MSCATV-EV significantly decreased the protein expression of Arg1 (P < 0.05) but increased that of iNOS and phosphorylated Stat1 in the infarcted region (all P < 0.05) in comparison with MSCATV-EV (Fig. 6G, H). Similarly, and consistently, miR-139-3p inhibitor significantly impaired the superior effects of MSCATV-EV on promoting the mRNA expressions of the macrophage M2 markers of Arg1, IL-10, and CD206 and on suppressing those M1 markers of iNOS, IL-12, or TNF-α in infarcted region (all P < 0.05), while miR-139-3p mimic significantly enhanced the efficacy of MSC-EV reaching a similar level of MSCATV-EV (Fig. 6I).

Fig. 6
figure 6

MSCATV-EV transfer of miR-139-3p enhances M2 macrophage polarization in infarcted region of AMI rats. A Representative confocal images of CD68+ (M1) and CD206+ (M2) macrophages within the infarct zone on day 3 after AMI. B Quantification of CD68+ or CD206+ macrophages in A, n = 6–7 per group. C Representative M-mode echocardiogram of each group on day 28 after AMI. D Comparisons of LVEF and LVFS in each group based on the echocardiographic images, n = 6–7 per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. E Representatives cross sections of AMI heart with Masson trichrome staining on day 28. F Quantification of infarct size of each group in E, n = 6–7 per group. G Western blot analysis of iNOS, Arg1, and p-Stat1 expressions in infarct myocardium of each group. H Quantification of iNOS, Arg1, and p-Stat1 expressions in G, n = 3 per group. I The mRNA expressions of macrophage M1 (iNOS, IL-12, TNF-α) and M2 (Arg1, IL-10, CD206) markers in infarcted region measured by qPCR, n = 3-4 per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. MSCATV-EV-miR inhibitor, MSCATV-EV with miR-139-3p inhibitor; MSC-EV-miR mimic, MSC-EV with miR-139-3p mimic. Arg1, arginase 1; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; ATV, atorvastatin; DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; EV, extracellular vesicle; IL, interleukin; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVFS, left ventricular fractional shortening; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; p-Stat1, phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 1; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; Stat1, signal transducer and activator of transcription 1; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha

Full size image

Taken together, all these results above suggested that MSCATV-EV delivered the upregulated miR-139-3p into infarcted myocardium to prevent from macrophage infiltration and inhibit Stat1 activation in infiltrated macrophages, shifting macrophage polarization from M1 to M2, which alleviates inflammation and enhances cardiac repair after AMI (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Schematic summary of our main findings. Intramyocardial injection of rat bone marrow MSCATV-EV in border zone delivers the upregulated miR-139-3p into infiltrated macrophages and promotes M2 macrophage polarization by suppressing Stat1 expression and activation, facilitating cardiac repair after infarction. ATV, atorvastatin; EVs, extracellular vesicles; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; Stat1, signal transducer and activator of transcription 1

Full size image

Discussion

The main findings in the present study are as follows: (1) intramyocardial injection of MSCATV-EV was found to remarkably decrease CD68+ total macrophage infiltration in the infarcted region with the number of CD206+ (M2) macrophages increased and to markedly improve heart function with infarct size reduced; (2) MSCATV-EV was shown to shift macrophage polarization from M1 to M2 in vitro; (3) upregulated miR-139-3p in MSCATV-EV was revealed to be delivered into macrophages to promote M2 polarization via inhibiting Stat1 expression and activation; (4) knockdown of miR-139-3p in MSCATV-EV was verified to eliminate its macrophage M2 polarization shifting and cardioprotective effects in AMI rats. This study was the first to reveal the miRNA profiles of MSCATV-EV and find miR-139-3p is a cardioprotective mediator of promoting macrophage M2 polarization from M1 by targeting Stat1, providing new insights into the mechanisms of MSCATV-EV in superior effects on cardiac repair for AMI.

Shifting macrophage polarization from M1 to M2 is a promising way to promote myocardial repair after AMI [45,46,47,48]. In the first 3 days after AMI, proinflammatory M1 macrophages dominate in the infarct region to remove cell debris and degrade extracellular matrix by secreting cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and matrix metalloproteinases [30], whereas the persistent M1 macrophages can expand inflammation to damage nonischemic myocardium and hinder myocardial repair [49]. On days 5 to 7 post-AMI, anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages become dominant and produce restorative factors such as IL-10, vascular endothelial growth factor, and transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) to promote cardiac repair [30, 31, 35]. Previous studies have reported that EVs secreted by cardiosphere-derived cells or MSCs (untreated) promoted M2 macrophage polarization in a rat or mouse myocardial ischemia-reperfusion model, with LVEF values of 10 to 12 percentage points increase [17, 50]. Another study showed that LPS-pretreated MSCs facilitate M2 macrophage polarization in a mouse AMI model, however without the data of cardiac function [51]. Our findings in the present study indicate that MSCATV-EV can not only restrict total macrophage infiltration in the infarct region of acute stage AMI but also effectively shift its macrophages from M1 to M2 polarization, resulting in prominent improvements of cardiac function with as high as by 31.2% and even 23.6% increase in LVEF value compared with both AMI and MSC-EV groups (52.89% vs. 21.66% and 29.31%) with infarct size reduced by 19.8% and 7.9% (10.22% vs. 30.06% and 18.12%) respectively. Most importantly, pretreatment of MSCs with ATV is the safest and the most acceptable, feasible and straightforward strategy in clinical translation so far.

Mechanistically, stem cell-derived EVs deliver various molecules that affect macrophage polarization, such as EV miR-181b from cardiosphere-derived cells and miR-182 from MSC-derived EVs [17, 50]. We previously explored the long ncRNA profiles in MSCATV-EV and proved that ATV pretreatment makes MSC-derived EVs rich of H19, which promotes angiogenesis and reduces cardiomyocyte apoptosis in the infarcted rat hearts [28]. However, the miRNA profiles of MSCATV-EV had not been revealed before. In this study, we discovered that ATV pretreatment induced miR-139-3p secretion from MSCs and EVs produced from ATV-pretreated MSCs transported miR-139-3p into macrophages to enhance M2 polarization. Although we did not explore how ATV induces miR-139-3p secretion from MSCs, previous studies have reported that statins inhibit enhancer of zeste homolog 2 expression, which is known to downregulate miR-139 [52,53,54,55,56]. Additionally, Papangeli, I. et al. has also reported that ATV can increase miR-139-5p expression in human umbilical vein endothelial cells [57]. Hence, it is a logical mechanism by which ATV pretreatment enhances secretion of EV miR-139-3p from MSCs.

miR-139(-3p/-5p) is a well-known tumor suppressor and a promising but not well-studied cardiac protector [58,59,60]. It was downregulated in several cardiovascular diseases. For example, the expression of miR-139-3p was reported to be decreased in the peripheral blood of patients suffering from the first AMI (GSE24591); the expression of miR-139-5p also decreased in the ischemic left ventricular myocardium during heart-lung transplantation, in the myocardium of patients died within 7 days after AMI, and in the coronary artery tissues of patients with coronary atherosclerosis [56, 61, 62]; the expression of miR-139 decreased as well in hearts of patients with primary dilated cardiomyopathy [63]. However, all of these studies did not further explore how miR-139(-3p/-5p) influences those cardiovascular diseases. The present study explored the mechanisms of superior efficacy of MSCATV-EVs for cardiac repair after AMI and revealed for the first time that upregulated miR-139-3p in MSCATV-EVs was delivered into macrophages to shift macrophage polarization from M1 to M2 via suppressing the expression and activation of Stat1. We preliminarily validated that miR-139-3p was a potential cardiac reparative factor for AMI as many blood monocyte-derived macrophages were infiltrated in the infarct region during the early stage of AMI.

Stat1 activation is well known to promote M1 macrophage polarization and its suppression facilitates M2 polarization [44, 64]. One study recently reported that miR-139-5p inhibited apoptosis of human arterial smooth muscle cells in the process of atherosclerosis via downregulating Stat1 [56]. Another study reported miR-139/Stat3 axis was involved in osteoclastogenesis in lung adenocarcinoma microenvironment [65]. We for the first time found in this study that miR-139-3p specifically inhibited the expression and activation of Stat1 to promote M2 macrophage polarization for cardiac repair by MSCATV-EV delivery after AMI. In addition, miR-139-3p/-5p may also affect macrophage functions of other aspects such as macrophage migration and secretion of inflammatory factors [66, 67]. We also found miR-139-3p mimics in MSC-EV as well as miR-139-3p in MSCATV-EV both reduced the total macrophage infiltration in the infarct region on day 3 after AMI, while knocking down miR-139-3p in MSCATV-EV reversed the beneficial effects, further verifying for the first time miR-139-3p to be able to restrict excessive inflammation in the acute stage of infarcted hearts. As far as we know, this is the first study to prove the key roles of miR-139-3p/Stat1 pathway in macrophage polarization shifting and excessive infiltration restricting in the infarct region post-AMI.

Clinical implications and limitations

Given the above findings, MSCATV-EV is expected to have great potential for clinical translation in the treatment of AMI patients, since MSC pretreatment with ATV, a commonly used clinical medication, is the safest and the most acceptable, feasible, and straightforward modification, particularly favoring the clinical translation for AMI treatment [51, 68].

Despite these promising results, there remain some limitations in the present study. First, given the pleiotropic effect of miRNA, it is possible that miR-139-3p targets multiple genes and affects various cell functions (Additional file 1: Table S13). Here, we investigated only the polarization effects of EV miR-139-3p on macrophages not including other cardiac cells, such as cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts, and we did not explore other possible target genes of miR-139-3p that might regulate macrophage polarization. Secondly, other differentially expressed miRNAs in MSCATV-EV may also exert a role in cardioprotection. Finally, it is unclear whether the potent cardiac repair effects of MSCATV-EV in experimental study could be observed in patients and whether intravenous administration of MSCATV-EV works. These are worth to be further investigated in the future.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrated that intramyocardial injection of MSCATV-EV in the infarct region could not only restricted macrophage infiltration but also delivered EV miR-139-3p to macrophages, which further inhibits the expression and activation of Stat1 to promote M2 macrophage polarization, remarkably facilitating cardiac repair after AMI. This study provides new insights into the mechanisms for the superior effects of MSCATV-EV to MSC-EV in cardiac repair of rat AMI, which has the great potential for clinical translation.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AMI:

Acute myocardial infarction

Arg1:

Arginase 1

ATV:

Atorvastatin

BMDMs:

Bone marrow-derived macrophages

CSF:

Colony stimulating factor

DMSO:

Dimethyl sulfoxide

EVs:

Extracellular vesicles

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

GEO:

Gene expression omnibus

GO:

Gene ontology

IL:

Interleukin

IMDM:

Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium

iNOS:

Inducible nitric oxide synthase

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

LVEDd:

Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension

LVEDV:

Left ventricular end-diastolic volume

LVEF:

Left ventricular ejection fraction

LVESd:

Left ventricular end-systolic dimension

LVESV:

Left ventricular end-systolic volume

LVFS:

Left ventricular fractional shortening

miRNAs:

microRNAs

MSCATV :

Atorvastatin-pretreated mesenchymal stem cells

MSCATV-EV:

Extracellular vesicles derived from mesenchymal stem cells pretreated with atorvastatin

MSC-EV:

Extracellular vesicles derived from mesenchymal stem cells

MSCs:

Mesenchymal stem cells

NC:

Negative control

ncRNA:

Non-coding RNA

PBS:

Phosphate buffer saline

qPCR:

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction

RPM:

Reads per million

SD:

Standard deviation

sEVs:

Small extracellular vesicles

Stat1:

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor alpha

References

  1. Golpanian S, Schulman IH, Ebert RF, Heldman AW, DiFede DL, Yang PC, et al. Concise review: review and perspective of cell dosage and routes of administration from preclinical and clinical studies of stem cell therapy for heart disease. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2016;5(2):186–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tompkins BA, Balkan W, Winkler J, Gyongyosi M, Goliasch G, Fernandez-Aviles F, et al. Preclinical studies of stem cell therapy for heart disease. Circ Res. 2018;122(7):1006–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Blau HM, Daley GQ. Stem cells in the treatment of disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(18):1748–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nguyen PK, Rhee JW, Wu JC. Adult stem cell therapy and heart failure, 2000 to 2016: a systematic review. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(7):831–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Fernandez-Aviles F, Sanz-Ruiz R, Climent AM, Badimon L, Bolli R, Charron D, et al. Global position paper on cardiovascular regenerative medicine. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(33):2532–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Garikipati VNS, Shoja-Taheri F, Davis ME, Kishore R. Extracellular vesicles and the application of system biology and computational modeling in cardiac repair. Circ Res. 2018;123(2):188–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Glembotski CC. Expanding the paracrine hypothesis of stem cell-mediated repair in the heart: when the unconventional becomes conventional. Circ Res. 2017;120(5):772–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Boulanger CM, Loyer X, Rautou PE, Amabile N. Extracellular vesicles in coronary artery disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017;14(5):259–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Caccioppo A, Franchin L, Grosso A, Angelini F, D’Ascenzo F, Brizzi M. Ischemia reperfusion injury: mechanisms of damage/protection and novel strategies for cardiac recovery/regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(20):5024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Thery C, Witwer KW, Aikawa E, Alcaraz MJ, Anderson JD, Andriantsitohaina R, et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J Extracell Vesicles. 2018;7(1):1535750.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Barile L, Moccetti T, Marban E, Vassalli G. Roles of exosomes in cardioprotection. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(18):1372–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pegtel DM, Gould SJ. Exosomes. Annu Rev Biochem. 2019;88(1):487–514.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Brien K, Breyne K, Ughetto S, Laurent LC, Breakefield XO. RNA delivery by extracellular vesicles in mammalian cells and its applications. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(10):585–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Penna C, Femminò S, Tapparo M, Lopatina T, Fladmark K, Ravera F, et al. The inflammatory cytokine IL-3 hampers cardioprotection mediated by endothelial cell-derived extracellular vesicles possibly via their protein cargo. Cells. 2020;10(1):13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. D'Ascenzo F, Femminò S, Ravera F, Angelini F, Caccioppo A, Franchin L, et al. Extracellular vesicles from patients with acute coronary syndrome impact on ischemia-reperfusion injury. Pharmacol Res. 2021;170:105715.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Xiao C, Wang K, Xu Y, Hu H, Zhang N, Wang Y, et al. Transplanted mesenchymal stem cells reduce autophagic flux in infarcted hearts via the exosomal transfer of mir-125b. Circ Res. 2018;123(5):564–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. de Couto G, Gallet R, Cambier L, Jaghatspanyan E, Makkar N, Dawkins JF, et al. Exosomal MicroRNA transfer into macrophages mediates cellular postconditioning. Circulation. 2017;136(2):200–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhu W, Sun L, Zhao P, Liu Y, Zhang J, Zhang Y, et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor facilitates the therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells derived exosomes in acute myocardial infarction through upregulating miR-133a-3p. J Nanobiotechnol. 2021;19(1):61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Marbán E. The secret life of exosomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(2):193–200.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Chien KR, Frisen J, Fritsche-Danielson R, Melton DA, Murry CE, Weissman IL. Regenerating the field of cardiovascular cell therapy. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(3):232–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang YJ, Qian HY, Huang J, Li JJ, Gao RL, Dou KF, et al. Combined therapy with simvastatin and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells increases benefits in infarcted swine hearts. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29(12):2076–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang YJ, Qian HY, Huang J, Geng YJ, Gao RL, Dou KF, et al. Atorvastatin treatment improves survival and effects of implanted mesenchymal stem cells in post-infarct swine hearts. Eur Heart J. 2008;29(12):1578–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu J, Xiong YY, Li Q, Hu MJ, Huang PS, Xu JY, et al. Optimization of timing and times for administration of atorvastatin-pretreated mesenchymal stem cells in a preclinical model of acute myocardial infarction. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2019;8(10):1068–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Song L, Yang YJ, Dong QT, Qian HY, Gao RL, Qiao SB, et al. Atorvastatin enhance efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells treatment for swine myocardial infarction via activation of nitric oxide synthase. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e65702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang YJ, Qian HY, Song L, Geng YJ, Gao RL, Li N, et al. Strengthening effects of bone marrow mononuclear cells with intensive atorvastatin in acute myocardial infarction. Open Heart. 2020;7(1):e001139.

  26. Li N, Yang YJ, Qian HY, Li Q, Zhang Q, Li XD, et al. Intravenous administration of atorvastatin-pretreated mesenchymal stem cells improves cardiac performance after acute myocardial infarction: role of CXCR4. Am J Transl Res. 2015;7(6):1058–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Tian XQ, Yang YJ, Li Q, Xu J, Huang PS, Xiong YY, et al. Combined therapy with atorvastatin and atorvastatin-pretreated mesenchymal stem cells enhances cardiac performance after acute myocardial infarction by activating SDF-1/CXCR4 axis. Am J Transl Res. 2019;11(7):4214–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang P, Wang L, Li Q, Tian X, Xu J, Xu J, et al. Atorvastatin enhances the therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes in acute myocardial infarction via up-regulating long non-coding RNA H19. Cardiovasc Res. 2020;116(2):353–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang P, Wang L, Li Q, Xu J, Xu J, Xiong Y, et al. Combinatorial treatment of acute myocardial infarction using stem cells and their derived exosomes resulted in improved heart performance. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):300.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. ter Horst EN, Hakimzadeh N, van der Laan AM, Krijnen PA, Niessen HW, Piek JJ. Modulators of macrophage polarization influence healing of the infarcted myocardium. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(12):29583–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ma Y, Mouton AJ, Lindsey ML. Cardiac macrophage biology in the steady-state heart, the aging heart, and following myocardial infarction. Transl Res. 2018;191:15–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Andreadou I, Cabrera-Fuentes HA, Devaux Y, Frangogiannis NG, Frantz S, Guzik T, et al. Immune cells as targets for cardioprotection: new players and novel therapeutic opportunities. Cardiovasc Res. 2019;115(7):1117–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ong SB, Hernandez-Resendiz S, Crespo-Avilan GE, Mukhametshina RT, Kwek XY, Cabrera-Fuentes HA, et al. Inflammation following acute myocardial infarction: Multiple players, dynamic roles, and novel therapeutic opportunities. Pharmacol Ther. 2018;186:73–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Nahrendorf M, Swirski FK, Aikawa E, Stangenberg L, Wurdinger T, Figueiredo JL, et al. The healing myocardium sequentially mobilizes two monocyte subsets with divergent and complementary functions. J Exp Med. 2007;204(12):3037–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Nahrendorf M, Swirski FK. Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity in the heart. Circ Res. 2013;112(12):1624–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ning Y, Jia Y, Yang Y, Wen W, Huang M, Liu S, et al. Thyroid hormones inhibit apoptosis of macrophage induced by oxidized low-density lipoprotein. BioFactors (Oxford, England). 2022;48(1):86–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen D, Xie J, Fiskesund R, Dong W, Liang X, Lv J, et al. Chloroquine modulates antitumor immune response by resetting tumor-associated macrophages toward M1 phenotype. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):873.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Murray PJ, Allen JE, Biswas SK, Fisher EA, Gilroy DW, Goerdt S, et al. Macrophage activation and polarization: nomenclature and experimental guidelines. Immunity. 2014;41(1):14–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Thery C, Amigorena S, Raposo G, Clayton A. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Curr Protocols Cell Biol. 2006;Chapter 3:Unit 3 22.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods. 2008;5(7):621–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009;19(9):1639–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Mathieu M, Nevo N, Jouve M, Valenzuela JI, Maurin M, Verweij FJ, et al. Specificities of exosome versus small ectosome secretion revealed by live intracellular tracking of CD63 and CD9. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):4389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Lawrence T, Natoli G. Transcriptional regulation of macrophage polarization: enabling diversity with identity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(11):750–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhou LS, Zhao GL, Liu Q, Jiang SC, Wang Y, Zhang DM. Silencing collapsin response mediator protein-2 reprograms macrophage phenotype and improves infarct healing in experimental myocardial infarction model. J Inflamm. 2015;12:11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Weirather J, Hofmann UD, Beyersdorf N, Ramos GC, Vogel B, Frey A, et al. Foxp3+ CD4+ T cells improve healing after myocardial infarction by modulating monocyte/macrophage differentiation. Circ Res. 2014;115(1):55–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Harel-Adar T, Ben Mordechai T, Amsalem Y, Feinberg MS, Leor J, Cohen S. Modulation of cardiac macrophages by phosphatidylserine-presenting liposomes improves infarct repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(5):1827–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Courties G, Heidt T, Sebas M, Iwamoto Y, Jeon D, Truelove J, et al. In vivo silencing of the transcription factor IRF5 reprograms the macrophage phenotype and improves infarct healing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(15):1556–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Leuschner F, Dutta P, Gorbatov R, Novobrantseva TI, Donahoe JS, Courties G, et al. Therapeutic siRNA silencing in inflammatory monocytes in mice. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(11):1005–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhao J, Li X, Hu J, Chen F, Qiao S, Sun X, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived exosomes attenuate myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury through miR-182-regulated macrophage polarization. Cardiovasc Res. 2019;115(7):1205–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Xu R, Zhang F, Chai R, Zhou W, Hu M, Liu B, et al. Exosomes derived from pro-inflammatory bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells reduce inflammation and myocardial injury via mediating macrophage polarization. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23(11):7617–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Ishikawa S, Hayashi H, Kinoshita K, Abe M, Kuroki H, Tokunaga R, et al. Statins inhibit tumor progression via an enhancer of zeste homolog 2-mediated epigenetic alteration in colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2014;135(11):2528–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Chen WW, Qi JW, Hang Y, Wu JX, Zhou XX, Chen JZ, et al. Simvastatin is beneficial to lung cancer progression by inducing METTL3-induced m6A modification on EZH2 mRNA. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(8):4263–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wu D, Wu F, Li B, Huang W, Wang D. EZH2 promotes the expression of LPA1 by mediating microRNA-139 promoter methylation to accelerate the development of ovarian cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20(1):551.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Wang D, Au SL, Wong CC, Lee JM, Fan DN, Tsang FH, et al. Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 epigenetically silences multiple tumor suppressor microRNAs to promote liver cancer metastasis. Cancer Cell Int. 2012;56(2):622–31.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zheng X, Zhao X, Han Z, Chen K. Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 participates in the process of atherosclerosis by modulating microRNA-139-5p methylation and signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 expression. IUBMB Life. 2021;73(1):238–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Papangeli I, Kim J, Maier I, Park S, Lee A, Kang Y, et al. MicroRNA 139-5p coordinates APLNR-CXCR4 crosstalk during vascular maturation. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Min L, Zhu S, Chen L, Liu X, Wei R, Zhao L, et al. Evaluation of circulating small extracellular vesicles derived miRNAs as biomarkers of early colon cancer: a comparison with plasma total miRNAs. J Extracell Vesicles. 2019;8(1):1643670.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Sannigrahi MK, Sharma R, Singh V, Panda NK, Rattan V, Khullar M. Role of host miRNA Hsa-miR-139-3p in HPV-16-induced carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(14):3884–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Alemdehy MF, Haanstra JR, de Looper HW, van Strien PM, Verhagen-Oldenampsen J, Caljouw Y, et al. ICL-induced miR139-3p and miR199a-3p have opposite roles in hematopoietic cell expansion and leukemic transformation. Blood. 2015;125(25):3937–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Saddic LA, Chang TW, Sigurdsson MI, Heydarpour M, Raby BA, Shernan SK, et al. Integrated microRNA and mRNA responses to acute human left ventricular ischemia. Physiol Genomics. 2015;47(10):455–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Bostjancic E, Zidar N, Glavac D. MicroRNA microarray expression profiling in human myocardial infarction. Dis Markers. 2009;27(6):255–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Sucharov C, Bristow MR, Port JD. miRNA expression in the failing human heart: functional correlates. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2008;45(2):185–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Kong D, Shen Y, Liu G, Zuo S, Ji Y, Lu A, et al. PKA regulatory IIα subunit is essential for PGD2-mediated resolution of inflammation. J Exp Med. 2016;213(10):2209–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Zhang L, Liu M, Liu J, Li X, Yang M, Su B, et al. 27-Hydroxycholesterol enhanced osteoclastogenesis in lung adenocarcinoma microenvironment. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(8):12692–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Latorre J, Moreno-Navarrete JM, Mercader JM, Sabater M, Rovira O, Girones J, et al. Decreased lipid metabolism but increased FA biosynthesis are coupled with changes in liver microRNAs in obese subjects with NAFLD. Int J Obes. 2017;41(4):620–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Chen Y, Li Y, Zheng G, Zhou P. Construction and analysis of macrophage infiltration related circRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory networks in hepatocellular carcinoma. PeerJ. 2020;8:e10198.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Shen B, Liu J, Zhang F, Wang Y, Qin Y, Zhou Z, et al. CCR2 Positive exosome released by mesenchymal stem cells suppresses macrophage functions and alleviates ischemia/reperfusion-induced renal injury. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:1240301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81573957, No.81874461, No.82070307, No.82100313), the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS, 2016-12M-1-009), the 863 Program of China (2013AA020101), and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No.2017YFC1700503).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

    Yu Ning & Peisen Huang

  2. State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No.167 North Lishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100037, China

    Yu Ning, Peisen Huang, Guihao Chen, Yuyan Xiong, Zhaoting Gong, Chunxiao Wu, Junyan Xu, Wenyang Jiang, Xiaosong Li, Ruijie Tang, Lili Zhang, Mengjin Hu, Jing Xu, Jun Xu, Haiyan Qian, Chen Jin & Yuejin Yang

  3. National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Assisted Circulation, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

    Yu Ning & Peisen Huang

Authors
  1. Yu Ning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peisen Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guihao Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuyan Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhaoting Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chunxiao Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Junyan Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wenyang Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xiaosong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ruijie Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Lili Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Mengjin Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jing Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Jun Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Haiyan Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Chen Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Yuejin Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.N. drafted the manuscript. Y.N., Z.T.G., C.X.W., J.Y.X., W.Y.J., X.S.L., R.J.T., L.L.Z., M.J.H., J.X.1, and J.X.2 conducted the experiments. Y.N., P.S.H., G.H.C., and Y.Y.X. analyzed and interpreted the data. H.Y.Q., C.J., and Y.J.Y. revised the manuscript. Y.N., P.S.H., G.H.C., and Y.J.Y. conceived and supervised this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuejin Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animal protocols were performed with approval of the Experimental Animals Ethics Committee of Fuwai Hospital (FW-2018-0010, FW-2018-0011).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Supplementary data.

Additional file 2.

The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: author checklist.

Additional file 3: Figure S1.

The cell viability of MSC or MSCATV after 72h treatment measured by MTT assay. ns: no significance.

Additional file 4: Supplementary Video. Dynamical observation of PKH26-labeled MSCATV-EV uptake by BMDMs using Opera Phenix high-content screening system.

Additional file 5: Figure S2.

Molecule size ranges of RNA samples from MSC-EV and MSCATV-EV. RNA molecule size ranges of four MSC-EV (A) and four MSCATV-EV (B) were established by Agilent 2200 TapeStation Instrument. HSRNA ladders include 25, 200, 500, 1,000, 2,000, 4,000 and 6,000 nt.

Additional file 6: Figure S3.

Non-coding RNA annotation of MSC-EV and MSCATV-EV. The mapped read counts were plotted on a log-scale. “Others” refer to the reads that cannot be mapped to the known non-coding RNA reads.

Additional file 7: Figure S4.

The original image of Fig. 4F (Interaction network between target genes of three upregulated miRNAs (miR-139-3p, miR-320-3p, miR-501-3p) and upregulated genes in patients suffered from first acute myocardial infarction (GEO: GSE24591).)

Additional file 8: Figure S5.

The original image of Fig. 4G (Interaction network between target genes of three upregulated miRNAs (miR-139-3p, miR-320-3p, miR-501-3p) and downregulated genes in human monocyte-derived M2 macrophages (GEO: GSE32164)).

Additional file 9: Figure S6.

Consensus sequence of rno-miR-139. Stacked histogram displays the counts of mapped reads to rno-miR-139 in miRNA-seq of MSC-EV (red) and MSCATV-EV (blue). Seqlogos of mapped reads were displayed above the histogram while reference sequence of rno-mir-139 marked with the locations of rno-miR-139-5p and rno-miR-139-3p were displayed below the histogram.

Additional file 10: Figure S7.

Stat1 is the target gene of miR-139-3p. A, Consequential pairing of Stat1 3’UTR and miR-139-3p predicted by TargetScan. B, Luciferase activity was measured and normalized by Renilla luciferase activity. WT, wild type. Mut, mutated. NC, negative control. **P<0.01 compared with WT 3’UTR+NC mimic group, n = 4 per group.

Additional file 11.

Images of the original blots.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ning, Y., Huang, P., Chen, G. et al. Atorvastatin-pretreated mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles promote cardiac repair after myocardial infarction via shifting macrophage polarization by targeting microRNA-139-3p/Stat1 pathway. BMC Med 21, 96 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-02778-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-02778-x

Keywords

BMC Medicine

ISSN: 1741-7015

Contact us