Skip to main content
Download PDF

Neutrophil activation may trigger tau burden contributing to cognitive progression of chronic sleep disturbance in elderly individuals not living with dementia

BMC Medicine volume 21, Article number: 205 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

To investigate the complex connection between chronic sleep disturbance (CSD) and cognitive progression.

Methods

The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database was used to assign 784 non-dementia elderly into two groups: a normal sleep group (528 participants) and a CSD group (256 participants) via the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)-sleep subitem. Blood transcriptomics, blood neutrophil, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and neutrophil-related inflammatory factors were measured. We also investigated gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), Cox proportional hazards model for risk factors, and mediation and interaction effects between indicators. Cognitive progression is defined as the progression from cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment (MCI)/dementia or from MCI to dementia.

Results

CSD could significantly affect cognitive function. The activated neutrophil pathways for cognitive progression in CSD were identified by transcriptomics GSEA, which was reflected by increased blood neutrophil level and its correlation with cognitive progression in CSD. High tau burden mediated the influence of neutrophils on cognitive function and exacerbated the CSD-related risk of left hippocampal atrophy. Elevated neutrophil-related inflammatory factors were observed in the cognitive progression of CSD and were associated with brain tau burden.

Conclusions

Activated neutrophil pathway triggering tau pathology may underline the mechanism of cognitive progression in CSD.

Peer Review reports

Background

More than 47 million people worldwide are affected by dementia, and the number is estimated to double every 20 years with the increases in life expectancy [1, 2]. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) accounts for 60 to 70% of all dementia cases [3], and the accumulation of toxic forms of β-amyloid (Aβ) and tau neurofibrillary tangles in the brain is considered the main pathological mechanism. According to epidemiological studies, sleep difficulties are significantly more common among the elderly, with a prevalence of 36 to 69% [4]. When left untreated, sleep difficulties are associated with severe adverse consequences, ranging from poor mental health to cardiovascular disease [5]. According to the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)-sleep subitem, chronic sleep disturbance (CSD) consists of 8 aspects, including difficulty falling asleep, superficial sleep, early awakening, interrupted sleep, abnormal nighttime behavior, excessive daytime sleepiness, getting up at night, and other nocturnal abnormal behaviors. A bidirectional relationship exists between sleep and neurodegenerative disorders, such as AD, caused by Aβ and tau pathologies [6]. Extended periods of wakefulness or sleep deprivation were found to regulate the extracellular release of both Aβ [7, 8] and tau [9, 10]. Besides Aβ pathology, another biologically potential mechanism linking CSD and dementia risk is inflammatory response activation, which is thought to be an early event associated with the onset and clinical course of AD [11]. The mechanism by which inflammation associated with AD pathology regulates the relevance of CSD to cognitive function remains unclear. A better understanding of the mechanism of the effect of CSD on cognitive progression can help identify potential targets for dementia prevention.

Previous studies have shown that sleep disturbance can influence the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), which together alter the profile of proinflammatory gene expression [12], and induce increases in interleukin 6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP) [13], tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin 1β (IL-1β) [14], and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) [15]. Growing evidences demonstrated that sleep disturbance links with systemic inflammation and that neutrophils, as a marker of the ongoing non-specific inflammation and the first-line innate immune cell, can induce the uncontrolled release of toxic substances including inflammatory cytokines and tissue-damaging materials [16]. The ratio of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte has been repeatedly shown to be associated with obstructive sleep apnea [16,17,18]. Activation of neutrophils induces the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), leading to vascular destabilization [19], breakdown of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) [20], and vulnerability of the brain to damage [21]. Meanwhile, inflammatory cytokines also promote vascular permeability, neutrophil adhesion, and migration [22]. These findings suggested the importance of neutrophils in CSD, and we would focus on the effects of neutrophils on the association of CSD and cognitive function. In the present study, the longitudinal analysis showed the association of CSD with cognitive progression, and transcriptomics enrichment analysis revealed the activated neutrophil pathways in cognitively progressive subjects with CSD, which was echoed by analyses on blood neutrophils. The correlation between the neutrophil pathway and brain tau burden may reveal the mechanism, by which neutrophil activation triggers tau pathology to impair cognitive function in CSD.

Methods

Subjects

The data on 2272 adults were retrieved from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (http://adni.loni.usc.edu). ADNI is a multi-site dataset launched in 2003 and designed to test the clinical symptoms, imaging, genetic, and biochemical biomarkers of AD. Data collection and sharing in ADNI were approved by the institutional review boards of all participating institutions. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants or their guardians in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The participants are older adults aged 55–90. Each participant had an in-person neuropsychological assessment interview at baseline and annual follow-up [23, 24]. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are shown in the flow chart (Additional file 1). The subjects in this study received an NPI-sleep assessment [25, 26] at least twice in follow-up visits, with an interval of 6 months. The participants reporting normal sleep at each follow-up were selected for the normal sleep group (n = 528), and the subjects reporting sleep difficulties at baseline and follow-up (≥ 2 times in total) were selected for the CSD group (n = 256). To avoid information bias, patients who reported sleep disturbance only once were excluded. Finally, a total of 784 non-dementia elderly were included in this study. Detailed NPI-sleep assessments are provided in Additional file 2.

Cognitive assessments included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive (ADAS-cog), the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ), the ADNI-MEM for memory, and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). In the ADNI, cognitively normal subjects had MMSE scores of 24–30, a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 0, and no memory complaints. Subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) had MMSE scores of 24–30, a CDR score of 0.5, an informant-reported memory complaint, and objective evidence of memory loss. Through follow-up, dementia was diagnosed with MMSE scores of 20–26, a CDR score of 0.5–1, and subjective memory concern as reported by the subject, study partner, or clinician. The detailed criterion can be found in Additional file 2.

Individuals had in-person interviews at baseline and follow-up per 6 months, and the follow-up time was up to 168 months (28 times). A total of 784 non-dementia elderly were involved in this study at baseline, which included normal cognitive and MCI subjects. Through follow-up, cognitively stable individuals were defined as (1) stable normal cognitive, (2) stable MCI, or (3) MCI reversing into cognitively normal. Meanwhile, cognitively progressive individuals were defined as (1) MCI progressing into dementia or (2) cognitively normal progressing into MCI or dementia.

Routine blood test

After fasting overnight, the participants’ blood was collected in the morning using vacuum tubes with ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA). The blood samples were then sent for analysis on the same day of collection for routine blood test, including blood neutrophil percentage.

APOE genotype

DNA was extracted with the QIAamp®DNA Blood Mini Kit and amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with forward primers 5′-ACGGCTGTCCAAGGAGCTG-3′ (rs429358) and 5′-CTCCGCGATGCCGATGAC-3′ (rs7412). APOE genotype was performed through restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) technology.

Hippocampal volume

Annual change rates of hippocampal volumes were measured longitudinally in 198 subjects who had ≥ 3 available MRI assessments provided by ADNI imaging data. The methodology details of measuring hippocampal volumes are in the Additional file 3 [27].

CSF AD type and inflammatory biomarkers

Before analysis, all concentrations were normalized into Z scores, and outliers beyond ± 3δ were excluded. The CSF from 771 subjects had typical AD biomarkers, including Aβ42, p-tau, and t-tau proteins. These biomarkers were detected using a fully automated and highly standardized Roche Elecsys immunoassay. Meanwhile, the CSF from 189 subjects had inflammatory factors, including tumor necrosis factor receptor 1,2 (TNFR1,2); transforming growth factor 1,2,3 (TGFβ1,2,3); interleukin 6,7,21 (IL6,7,21); intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1); and VCAM1. These inflammatory markers were detected using commercially available multiplex immunoassays (Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA) modified for CSF analyte levels.

Blood-based microarray profiling and analysis

The PAXgene Blood RNA Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) was used to purify total RNA from the whole blood collected in a PAXgene Blood RNA Tube. The Affymetrix Human Genome U219 Array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used for expression profiling in ADNI. The quality of gene expression data, including sample quality, hybridization, and overall signal quality, was analyzed using Affymetrix Expression Console software and Partek Genomic Suite 6.6. Raw expression values were pre-processed using the robust multichip average (RMA) normalization method.

Enrichment analysis was performed on 88 cognitively stable and 54 cognitively progressive subjects with CSD to investigate the activated pathways for cognitive progression. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) [28] in R was used to screen the biological process (BP) of the Gene Ontology (GO) term through the c5.go.bp.v7.5.symbols.gmt in the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) [28], the GO-Biological-Process-2018.txt in the Enrichr database as a reference gene set, and the Disease-Perturbations-from-GEO-up.txt in the Enrichr database [29] for the pathway term between the groups. A value of adjusted p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Statistical analyses

The Mann–Whitney U test was used for continuous variables with non-normal distributions, while the chi-square test was used for categorical variables to test the differences between the groups.

The linear mixed-effects model depicted the effects of CSD on longitudinal clinical outcomes, including cognitive function and social activity function. The model included random slope and intercept terms for each participant. The effect of neutrophils on cognitive function was demonstrated using hierarchical regression. The risk factor of CSD for cognitive progression was predicted using a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model. To control for confounding by multiple factors, such as tau burden including CSF t-tau and p-tau, and other psychiatric symptoms including depression, appetite, aberrance, irritability, disinhibition, elation, and agitation, were all included in the Cox regression model. To eliminate the difference caused by a range of cognitive function between normal and MCI, besides demographic factors, baseline global cognition score (MMSE) was incorporated in the Cox regression model to assess the cognitive progression risk of CSD or neutrophil. A restricted cubic spline (RCS) curve was used to explore the association between blood neutrophils and cognitive outcome. RCS allows threshold identification of neutrophils on cognitive progression risk. According to the threshold of 61.33, we then divided the cohort into two subgroups (low neutrophil group < 61.633% versus high neutrophil group > 61.633%). Additionally, a Kaplan–Meier curve was used to plot the risk of cognitive progression. To determine annual change rates in cognition and hippocampal volume, we used the fitted linear mixed models with MMSE, ADAS-cog, FAQ, MoCA, ADNI-MEM, and hippocampal volumes as dependent variables and time (years from baseline) as independent variables, controlling for random intercept and slope. Then, a slope for the annual change rate was created for each subject. Longitudinal analyses were restricted to subjects with at least 3 time points.

Routine blood test of neutrophil and CSF inflammatory factors including TNFR1,2; TGFβ1,2,3; IL-6,7,21; ICAM1; and VCAM1 were compared between the normal and CSD groups using the Mann–Whitney U test. The Benjamini–Hochberg correction was used to adjust the p-value.

We used analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to test whether CSF t-tau or p-tau positivity aggravated the association between CSD and hippocampal atrophy, after controlling for the main effects of sleep, tau burden (CSF p-tau or t-tau), age, gender, education, APOE, and intracranial volume. p-tau positivity was defined as p-tau > 21.8 pg/mL, and t-tau positivity was defined as t-tau > 245 pg/ml. The p-value was corrected using a Bonferroni correction with an α-threshold of 0.025.

Mediation analysis was used to explore what pathways mediated the link between blood neutrophils and cognitive function. Through exploratory analysis, we assigned X as the blood neutrophil percentage, M (mediator) as brain tau burden (CSF t-tau or p-tau at baseline), and Y as the outcome (cognitive function and social activity function at 2-year follow-up). We then interpreted the total effect as the amplitude of neutrophils in cognitive progression, both directly and through tau pathology intermediates. Next, we estimated the effects of the tau burden on the cognitive outcome after observing the association for a potential mediator. Age, education, gender, and APOE genotype were included as covariates, and the total, direct, and indirect effects were estimated using model 4 (mediation) of the PROCESS macro by the bruceR package in R with a bootstrapping module of 1000 iterations.

The statistical significance of all tests had a p-value of < 0.05. All analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 or R version 4.2.0.

Results

Participant characteristics

A total of 784 elderly were included in the present study, and their characteristics from ADNI are summarized in Table 1. The participants were 72.91 ± 7.04 years old, had MMSE scores of 28.31 ± 1.72, and had a moderate education of 16.29 ± 2.64 years. Male participants accounted for 55.7% of the total participants. Subjects with CSD had less education, more impaired cognitive function, and lower social activity function (p < 0.05) (Table 1, Fig. 1A1–A5). Cognitively progressive elderly with CSD tended to be APOE ε4 carriers.

Table 1 Characteristics of participants
Full size table

Longitudinal effects of CSD on cognitive function and cognitive progression risk

A total of 784 individuals had in-person interviews at baseline and annual follow-up, with a total follow-up time of up to 168 months (n = 4253 person-times in total). Subjects with CSD displayed more longitudinal cognitive impairment and lower social activity function compared to normal sleep. There is no significant difference in the slope of the lines between the two groups (Fig. 1B1–B5).

During the follow-up period, in the CSD group, there were 35 stable normal cognitive subjects, 125 stable MCI subjects, 22 normal subjects developing MCI, and 74 MCI subjects developing dementia. In the normal sleep group, there were 224 stable normal cognitive subjects, 175 stable MCI subjects, 33 normal subjects developing MCI, 84 MCI subjects developing dementia, 1 normal subject developing dementia, and 11 MCI subjects reverting to normal. The results of the Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a significant difference in the cumulative proportion of individuals with cognitive stability between the normal sleep and CSD groups (p = 0.009) (Fig. 1C). The CSD group showed an increased risk of cognitive progression compared with the normal sleep group, according to the Cox proportional hazards model, with age, education years, gender, APOE, brain tau burden, baseline MMSE, and multiple psychiatric symptoms as covariates (Fig. 1D).

Fig. 1
figure 1

CSD may significantly increase the risk of cognitive decline. The significant differences in MMSE, FAQ, MoCA, and ADNI-MEM between the normal sleep and CSD groups at baseline, except for the ADAS-cog score. NS p > 0.05, *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 (A1–A5). The differences in MMSE, ADAS-cog, FAQ, MoCA, and ADNI-MEM at follow-up between the two groups based on the linear mixed-effects model after adjustment for age, education years, sex, and APOE status. There is no significant difference in the slope of the lines between the two groups (B1–B5). A Kaplan–Meier curve showed that the CSD group was associated with a higher risk of cognitive progression than the normal sleep group (C). The Cox proportional hazards model estimated the risk of cognitive progression in CSD after adjustment for age, education years, sex, APOE status, baseline MMSE, CSF t-tau, CSF p-tau, and multiple psychiatric symptoms (D)

Full size image

Enrichment analysis in CSD elderly

Among the CSD elderly, there were 88 cognitively stable and 54 cognitively progressive subjects. A total of 19,456 expressed genes were used for GSEA. GO biological process (BP) analysis showed that pathways related to neutrophil activation were significantly enriched in cognitively progressive subjects from the Enrichr (Fig. 2A1, A2) and MSig (Fig. 2C1, C2) databases. Disease pathway analysis showed that the AD-relevant pathway was significantly enriched in cognitively progressive subjects from the Enrichr database (Fig. 2B1, B2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The activated neutrophil and AD pathology pathways for cognitively progressive in CSD through enrichment analysis. The GO-BP analysis showed the pathways related to neutrophil activation from the Enrichr database (A1, A2) and the MSig database (C1, C2), and the disease enrichment analysis showed the pathways related to AD pathology from the Enrichr database (B1, B2) in cognitively progressive subjects as compared to cognitively stable subjects with CSD

Full size image

Effects of blood neutrophil on cognitive progression risk

A total of 720 participants had routine blood test of neutrophils, and 771 subjects had the CSF AD biomarker test. Cognitively progressive subjects with CSD had higher blood neutrophil percentage as compared with cognitively normal subjects with CSD; however, there was no difference in blood neutrophil percentage between cognitively progressive and cognitively normal subjects without CSD (Table 1) (Fig. 3A1) (adjusted p < 0.05). There were significant differences in Aβ, t-tau, or p-tau levels between cognitively normal and cognitively progressive subjects, in both normal sleep and CSD groups (Table 1) (adjusted p < 0.05) (Table 1). Hierarchical regression demonstrated the impact of neutrophil percentage on the annual change in cognitive function, including FAQ, MMSE, ADAS-cog, and ADNI-MEM in all the subjects (Table 2).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The significant differences in blood neutrophil percentage between the cognitively stable and cognitively progressive groups with CSD at baseline. NS adj p > 0.05, *adj p < 0.05 (A). The relative risk of cognitive progression was greater than 1.0 for the neutrophil (%) threshold of 61.633, and the relationship between neutrophil (%) and the corresponding HR was linear above this threshold in CSD subjects (B1), but there was no such relationship in normal sleep subjects (B2). Through the Cox proportional hazards model, blood neutrophil percentage was a risk factor for cognitive progression in the CSD group (C1) but not in the normal sleep group (C2). A Kaplan–Meier curve showing that subjects with higher blood neutrophil percentages were associated with a higher risk of cognitive progression (D). Spearman test showed that neutrophil percentage and neutrophil group correlated with CSF AD biomarker levels, baseline cognitive function, and annual changes in cognitive function, including ADAS-cog, MoCA, MMSE, FAQ, and MEM. *adj p < 0.05 (E)

Full size image
Table 2 Hierarchical regression in all the subjects
Full size table

RCS analysis was performed to further investigate the relationship between blood neutrophil and cognitive outcome, and the risk of cognitive progression increased with increasing blood neutrophil levels in CSD subjects (Fig. 3B1), with a threshold of 61.633 for blood neutrophil percentage. This such relationship was not observed in normal sleep subjects (Fig. 3B2). Individuals with higher neutrophil levels showed an increased risk of cognitive progression through the Cox regression, with age, education, sex, APOE, and baseline MMSE as covariates in CSD subjects (Fig. 3C1), but not in normal sleep subjects (Fig. 3C2). Survival analysis using the Kaplan–Meier curve revealed that subjects with higher neutrophil levels had a significant tendency for cognitive progression in all subjects (Fig. 3D). Significant correlations were also observed between blood neutrophil and annual changes in cognitive function, including MMSE, MEM, FAQ, MoCA, and ADAS-cog (adjusted p < 0.05) (Fig. 3E).

Interaction and mediation analyses

We investigated whether higher t-tau and p-tau levels exacerbated the effect of CSD on future hippocampal volume. Our findings showed a significant interaction between CSD and p-tau positivity (F = 7.847, adjusted p = 0.021) and interaction between CSD and t-tau positivity (F = 8.459, adjusted p = 0.018) on the annual change rate of left hippocampal volume in samples with higher neutrophil (Fig. 4B1, B2), but no significant results in all the samples (Fig. 4A1, A2), after controlling for the main effects of sleep, tau burden (t-tau or p-tau levels), and demographics. Furthermore, no such interaction was observed in the annual change rate of the right hippocampal volume. We found that t-tau and p-tau both mediated the association between blood neutrophil and cognitive function (ADAS-cog, MMSE, and FAQ) at 2 years follow-up. The mediation effect was considered to be partial, with the proportion of mediation ranging from 21 to 36% (Fig. 4C1–C6).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The interaction and mediation effects of blood neutrophil percentage on brain tau burden. The interaction effect of tau burden on longitudinal sleep-related changes in hippocampal volume was observed in the high neutrophil sample (B1, B2) but not in the pooled (high and low neutrophil) sample (A1, A2). NS adj p > 0.05, *adj p < 0.05. The mediation analysis showed the mediation effects of tau burden, including CSF t-tau (C1–C3) and p-tau (C4–C6), on blood neutrophil percentage within a 2-year follow-up of cognitive outcomes. The blue lines showed the total effect (c), the blue dotted lines showed the direct effect (c′), and the green lines depicted the mediation effects (a*b) of the tau burden. The path weight was expressed as an effect and a p-value

Full size image

Changes in inflammatory factors and correlation with tau burden due to CSD

We assessed CSF inflammatory factors in 189 subjects and found that higher levels of inflammatory factors, including ICAM1, VCAM1, TNFR2, and TGFβ1, were present in cognitively progressive subjects with CSD (adjusted p < 0.05) but not in cognitively progressive subjects with normal sleep (Table 1, Fig. 5A1–A4). Other six inflammatory factors, including TNFR1; TGFβ2,3; IL-6,7,21, were not observed significantly different between the groups (Table 1). Correlation analysis showed that these four inflammatory factors were significantly associated with CSF p-tau (Fig. 5B1–B4) and t-tau (Fig. 5C1–C4) levels, especially in individuals with CSD (p < 0.05).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The difference in neutrophil-related inflammatory factors, including CSF ICAM1, VCAM1, TNFR2, and TGFβ1, between the cognitively stable and cognitively progressive groups in CSD elderly but not in normal sleep elderly. NS adj p > 0.05, *adj p < 0.01 (A1–A4). These four factors were significantly correlated with CSF p-tau levels (B1–B4) and CSF t-tau levels (C1–C4)

Full size image

Discussion

The present study had four main findings. First, CSD could significantly affect cognitive function. Second, we found significant effects of blood neutrophils on cognitive progression induced by CSD. Third, tau burden mediated the association of blood neutrophils with cognitive function and increased the CSD-related risk of left hippocampus atrophy. Fourth, neutrophil-related inflammatory factors were elevated and correlated with tau burden in cognitively progressive elderly with CSD.

Our results were consistent with previous longitudinal researches showing that CSD can predict cognitive progression [30, 31]. We found a significant difference in cognitive function between the normal sleep and CSD groups after 14 years of follow-up. Sleep difficulties have also been reported to link to an increased risk of AD. A study of 20 participants infused with C-leucine to measure Aβ kinetics showed that acute sleep deprivation increased the overnight Aβ38, Aβ40, and Aβ42 levels by 25 to 30% [32]. Pathologically high p-tau and gliosis were also detected in the hippocampus of CSD mice [33]. Unlike previous researches, we found no significant changes in Aβ, t-tau, or p-tau levels in CSD subjects, but only in cognitively progressive elderly, whether they had CSD or not. This finding suggests that AD pathology is not the main characteristic pathology of cognitive decline in CSD but is closely related to it.

The GSEA revealed neutrophil activation and AD pathology as potential pathways. Tauopathy, a typical pathological feature of AD, has been shown to cause sleep disturbance. Sleep disruption has also been observed in the transgenic mouse model with overexpressed human tau mutation [34]. Notably, we found significant changes in t-tau and p-tau levels in the cognitively progressive subjects with CSD. Relative to tau pathology, the activated neutrophil pathway was less studied. Previous studies showed that social stress upregulates inflammatory gene expression in the leukocyte transcriptome [35]. A study of partial night sleep deprivation also found a shift in leukocyte transcriptional profiles towards the expression of genes associated with cellular senescence [36]. We found that blood neutrophil was increased in cognitively progressive subjects with CSD. Similarly, the hyperactive neutrophil state has also been associated with the rate of cognitive progression [37]. According to the Framingham Heart Study, individuals with a higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were at greater risk of subsequent dementia [38]. Our study found a significant risk of cognitive progression related to blood neutrophil levels in individuals with CSD.

Next, we investigated the interaction between the two pathways: AD pathology and neutrophil activation, and how this interaction contributed to the cognitive progression of CSD. The mediation analysis showed that t-tau and p-tau mediated the association between blood neutrophil and cognitive progression, and the effects varied from 21 to 36%. The interaction analysis showed that in the background of high blood neutrophil levels, high CSF t-tau and p-tau could exacerbate the effect of CSD on left hippocampal atrophy. Thus, we hypothesized that neutrophil-related neuro-immunity could possibly trigger or aggravate tau pathology, contributing to left hippocampal atrophy and subsequent cognitive progression in CSD.

Through hierarchical regression, we found that blood neutrophil impacted the annual change in cognitive function independently of CSF t-tau and p-tau levels, despite the small values of R2 change between the models with and without neutrophil. The possible mechanism is that neutrophil activation in CSD begins at the initial stage, then migrates to the perivascular space of the brain and triggers tau pathology at last, which maybe explain the small but significant effect of neutrophil on cognitive progression. Therefore, we predicted that neutrophil downstream inflammatory factors might have direct effects on cognitive progression through tau pathology. Neutrophils have a very short life cycle of up to 6 days in peripheral circulation [39]. In typical inflammation, neutrophils are cleared when the initial inflammatory insult is resolved. However, in CSD, neutrophils are recruited by chemokines, such as interleukin 8 (IL8) and C5a complement, and migrate into the peri-cerebrovascular space. As a result, neutrophils can adhere to endothelial cells, cross the blood–brain barrier, and release inflammatory factors that cause neuronal damage [40].

We found four factors that were significantly increased in CSF, including ICAM1, VCAM1, TNFR2, and TGFβ1. ICAM1 and VCAM1 required for neutrophil adhesion and trans-endothelial migration are highly expressed in endothelial cells [41]. TNFR2 is mainly expressed in immune cells, such as neutrophils, and acts as a potent pro-inflammatory cytokine. TGFβ1 has been implicated in myeloid cell activation, particularly neutrophil activation and degranulation [42]. Due to the neutrophil-adherent and inflammatory nature of these four factors, their upregulation suggests that the activation of the neutrophil downstream pathway occurs during the cognitive progression of CSD. Moreover, their levels correlated with CSF t-tau and p-tau, indicating that the activated neutrophil pathway was closely related to tau burden and brain function. Similar results from a large cohort study found that higher levels of CSF ICAM1 increased the risk of developing AD dementia and were associated with increased CSF levels of t-tau and p-tau [43]. Furthermore, chronic TNF treatment increased the release of toxic extracellular protein aggregates linking to AD pathology [44]. The above findings indicate that neutrophil-associated inflammatory cytokines may induce synergistic neurotoxicity that exacerbates neurodegeneration.

The present study had some limitations. Due to the lack of follow-up data on blood neutrophils, the trend of blood neutrophils in CSD was unclear. Also, only CSF t-tau and p-tau analysis was performed but not tau PET imaging, which limited the investigation of regional tau pathology in CSD. Additionally, this study included both cognitively normal and MCI subjects at baseline, which may have affected the population heterogeneity bias. So, the baseline cognitive function score has been incorporated into the Cox regression analysis to eliminate cognitive bias. Blood neutrophil and CSF tauopathy were identified as potential key pathways in the ADNI cohort, and future multi-cohort studies are needed for further validation.

Conclusions

In summary, this study shows that CSD is associated with cognitive progression and that the activated neutrophil pathway is involved in this process. Neutrophil-related neuro-immunity may exacerbate tau pathology, contributing to cognitive progression in the context of CSD.

Availability of data and materials

ADNI is available at http://adni.loni.usc.edu.

Abbreviations

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

ADAS-cog:

Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive

ADNI:

Alzheimer’s disease Neuroimaging Initiative

ANCOVA:

Analysis of covariance

Aβ:

β-Amyloid

BBB:

Blood-brain barrier

BP:

Biological process

CDR:

Clinical Dementia Rating

CRP:

C-reactive protein

CSD:

Chronic sleep disturbance

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

EDTA:

Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid

FAQ:

Functional Activities Questionnaire

GO:

Gene Ontology

GSEA:

Gene set enrichment analysis

HPA:

Hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal

ICAM1:

Intercellular adhesion molecule 1

IL-1β:

Interleukin 1β

IL6:

Interleukin 6

IL-6:

Interleukin 6

MCI:

Mild cognitive impairment

MMSE:

Mini-Mental State Examination

MoCA:

Montreal Cognitive Assessment

NETs:

Neutrophil extracellular traps

NPI:

Neuropsychiatric Inventory

RCS:

Restricted cubic spline

RFLP:

Restriction fragment length polymorphism

RMA:

Robust multichip average

SNS:

Sympathetic nervous system

TGFβ 1:

Transforming growth factor 1

TNFR1:

Tumor necrosis factor receptor

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor α

VCAM-1:

Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1

References

  1. Irwin MR, Vitiello MV. Implications of sleep disturbance and inflammation for Alzheimer’s disease dementia. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(3):296–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30450-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shi L, Chen SJ, Ma MY, Bao YP, Han Y, Wang YM, et al. Sleep disturbances increase the risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. 2018;40:4–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2017.06.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Matsumoto S, Tsunematsu TJB. Association between sleep, Alzheimer’s, and Parkinson’s disease. Biology (Basel). 2021;10(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10111127.

  4. Smagula S, Stone K, Fabio A, Cauley J. Risk factors for sleep disturbances in older adults: evidence from prospective studies. Sleep Med Rev. 2016;25:21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2015.01.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Robbins R, Weaver MD, Barger LK, Wang W, Quan SF, Czeisler CA. Sleep difficulties, incident dementia and all-cause mortality among older adults across 8 years: findings from the National Health and Aging Trends Study. J Sleep Res. 2021;30(6):e13395. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13395.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang C, Holtzman DM. Bidirectional relationship between sleep and Alzheimer’s disease: role of amyloid, tau, and other factors. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020;45(1):104–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-019-0478-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cirrito JR, Yamada KA, Finn MB, Sloviter RS, Bales KR, May PC, et al. Synaptic activity regulates interstitial fluid amyloid-beta levels in vivo. Neuron. 2005;48(6):913–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tabuchi M, Lone SR, Liu S, Liu Q, Zhang J, Spira AP, et al. Sleep interacts with abeta to modulate intrinsic neuronal excitability. Curr Biol. 2015;25(6):702–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Holth JK, Fritschi SK, Wang C, Pedersen NP, Cirrito JR, Mahan TE, et al. The sleep-wake cycle regulates brain interstitial fluid tau in mice and CSF tau in humans. Science. 2019;363(6429):880–4. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav2546.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Y, Balaji V, Kaniyappan S, Kruger L, Irsen S, Tepper K, et al. The release and trans-synaptic transmission of Tau via exosomes. Mol Neurodegener. 2017;12(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-016-0143-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wood H. Dementia: peripheral inflammation could be a prodromal indicator of dementia. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14(3):127. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2018.8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Irwin MR, Olmstead R, Carroll JE. Sleep disturbance, sleep duration, and inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies and experimental sleep deprivation. Biol Psychiatry. 2016;80(1):40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.05.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cole SW, Arevalo JM, Manu K, Telzer EH, Kiang L, Bower JE, et al. Antagonistic pleiotropy at the human IL6 promoter confers genetic resilience to the pro-inflammatory effects of adverse social conditions in adolescence. Dev Psychol. 2011;47(4):1173–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023871.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Atrooz F, Salim S. Sleep deprivation, oxidative stress and inflammation. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2020;119:309–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apcsb.2019.03.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aruoma OI, Grootveld M, Bahorun T. Free radicals in biology and medicine: from inflammation to biotechnology. Biofactors. 2006;27(1–4):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/biof.5520270101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Altintas N, Cetinoglu E, Yuceege M, Acet AN, Ursavas A, Firat H, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in obstructive sleep apnea; a multi center, retrospective study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(17):3234–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yenigun A, Karamanli H. Investigation of the relationship between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. J Laryngol Otol. 2015;129(9):887–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215115001747.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Halawani M, Naik S, Chan M, Kreinin I, Meiers J, Kryger M. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio decreases in obstructive sleep apnea treated with mandibular advancement devices. Sleep Breath. 2018;22(4):989–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-018-1635-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kang L, Yu H, Yang X, Zhu Y, Bai X, Wang R, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps released by neutrophils impair revascularization and vascular remodeling after stroke. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):2488. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16191-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma A, Muresanu DF, Lafuente JV, Patnaik R, Tian ZR, Buzoianu AD, et al. Sleep deprivation-induced blood-brain barrier breakdown and brain dysfunction are exacerbated by size-related exposure to Ag and Cu nanoparticles. Neuroprotective effects of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist ondansetron. Mol Neurobiol. 2015;52(2):867–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-015-9236-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zheng Y, Zhang L, Bonfili L, de Vivo L, Eleuteri AM, Bellesi M. Probiotics supplementation attenuates inflammation and oxidative stress induced by chronic sleep restriction. Nutrients. 2023;15(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15061518.

  22. Irwin MR. Why sleep is important for health: a psychoneuroimmunology perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015;66:143–72. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Petersen RC, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Donohue MC, Gamst AC, Harvey DJ, et al. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): clinical characterization. Neurology. 2010;74(3):201–9. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181cb3e25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Trojanowski JQ, Vandeerstichele H, Korecka M, Clark CM, Aisen PS, Petersen RC, et al. Update on the biomarker core of the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative subjects. Alzheimers Dement. 2010;6(3):230–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2010.03.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bubu OM, Williams ET, Umasabor-Bubu OQ, Kaur SS, Turner AD, Blanc J, et al. Interactive Associations of Neuropsychiatry Inventory-Questionnaire assessed sleep disturbance and vascular risk on Alzheimer’s disease stage progression in clinically normal older adults. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:763264. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.763264.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Louzada LL, Machado FV, Quintas JL, Ribeiro GA, Silva MV, Mendonca-Silva DL, et al. The efficacy and safety of zolpidem and zopiclone to treat insomnia in Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47(2):570–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01191-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Leung KK, Clarkson MJ, Bartlett JW, Clegg S, Jack CR Jr, Weiner MW, et al. Robust atrophy rate measurement in Alzheimer’s disease using multi-site serial MRI: tissue-specific intensity normalization and parameter selection. Neuroimage. 2010;50(2):516–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(43):15545–50. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506580102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kuleshov MV, Jones MR, Rouillard AD, Fernandez NF, Duan Q, Wang Z, et al. Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(W1):W90-97. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw377.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ma YH, Shen XN, Xu W, Huang YY, Li HQ, Tan L, et al. A panel of blood lipids associated with cognitive performance, brain atrophy, and Alzheimer’s diagnosis: a longitudinal study of elders without dementia. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2020;12(1):e12041. https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Xu W, Tan C, Zou J, Cao X, Tan L. Sleep problems and risk of all-cause cognitive decline or dementia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. 2020; 91(3):236-244. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2019-321896.

  32. Lucey B, Hicks T, McLeland J, Toedebusch C, Boyd J, Elbert D, et al. Effect of sleep on overnight cerebrospinal fluid amyloid β kinetics. Ann Neurol. 2018;83(1):197–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ba L, Huang L, He Z, Deng S, Xie Y, Zhang M, et al. Does chronic sleep fragmentation lead to Alzheimer’s disease in young wild-type mice? Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:759983. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.759983.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Holth JK, Mahan TE, Robinson GO, Rocha A, Holtzman DM. Altered sleep and EEG power in the P301S Tau transgenic mouse model. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2017;4(3):180–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.390.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Powell ND, Sloan EK, Bailey MT, Arevalo JM, Miller GE, Chen E, et al. Social stress up-regulates inflammatory gene expression in the leukocyte transcriptome via beta-adrenergic induction of myelopoiesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(41):16574–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1310655110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Carroll JE, Cole SW, Seeman TE, Breen EC, Witarama T, Arevalo JMG, et al. Partial sleep deprivation activates the DNA damage response (DDR) and the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) in aged adult humans. Brain Behav Immun. 2016;51:223–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2015.08.024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dong Y, Lagarde J, Xicota L, Corne H, Chantran Y, Chaigneau T, et al. Neutrophil hyperactivation correlates with Alzheimer’s disease progression. Ann Neurol. 2018;83(2):387–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ramos-Cejudo J, Johnson A, Beiser A, Seshadri S, Salinas J, Berger J, et al. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is associated with the risk of subsequent dementia in the Framingham Heart Study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:773984. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.773984.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Pillay J, den Braber I, Vrisekoop N, Kwast LM, de Boer RJ, Borghans JA, et al. In vivo labeling with 2H2O reveals a human neutrophil lifespan of 5.4 days. Blood. 2010;116(4):625–7. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-01-259028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou L, Wu X, Qin S, Shi J, Yu C, Xu Z et al. Cell-liposome delivery system based on neuroinflammation to target the amygdala for ameliorating depressive-like behaviors. Int J Pharm. 2023:122724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122724.

  41. Chong D, Rebeyrol C, José R, Williams A, Brown J, Scotton C, et al. In VivoICAM-1 and ICAM-2 are differentially expressed and up-regulated on inflamed pulmonary epithelium, but neither ICAM-2 nor LFA-1: ICAM-1 are required for neutrophil migration into the airways. Front Immunol. 2021;12:691957. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.691957.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Graham R, McMullen A, Moore G, Dempsey-Hibbert N, Myers B, Graham C. SWATH-MS identification of CXCL7, LBP, TGFβ1 and PDGFRβ as novel biomarkers in human systemic mastocytosis. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):5087. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08345-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Janelidze S, Mattsson N, Stomrud E, Lindberg O, Palmqvist S, Zetterberg H, et al. CSF biomarkers of neuroinflammation and cerebrovascular dysfunction in early Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2018;91(9):e867–77. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000006082.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Whiten DR, Brownjohn PW, Moore S, De S, Strano A, Zuo Y, et al. Tumour necrosis factor induces increased production of extracellular amyloid-beta- and alpha-synuclein-containing aggregates by human Alzheimer’s disease neurons. Brain Commun. 2020;2(2):1fcaa46. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaa146.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Data collection and sharing for the ADNI data section was funded by the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health Grant U01 AG024904) and DOD ADNI (Department of Defense award number W81XWH-12-2-0012). ADNI is funded by the National Institute on Aging and the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering and through generous contributions from the following organizations: AbbVie; Alzheimer’s Association; Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation; Araclon Biotech; BioClinica, Inc.; Biogen; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; CereSpir, Inc.; Cogstate; Eisai Inc.; Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company; EuroImmun; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. and its affiliated company Genentech, Inc.; Fujirebio; GE Healthcare; IXICO Ltd.; Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research & Development, LLC.; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC.; Lumosity; Lundbeck; Merck & Co., Inc.; Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC.; NeuroRx Research; Neurotrack Technologies; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer Inc.; Piramal Imaging; Servier; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; and Transition Therapeutics. The Canadian Institutes of Health Research funds the ADNI clinical sites in Canada. Private sector contributions are facilitated by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (www.fnih.org). The Northern California Institute for Research and Education is the grantee organization, and the study is coordinated by the Alzheimer’s Therapeutic Research Institute at the University of Southern California. ADNI data are published by the Laboratory for Neuro Imaging at the University of Southern California.

The data in this article were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (http://adni.loni.usc.edu). The investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and data of ADNI, but they did not participate in the analysis or writing of this report. A complete list of ADNI investigators can be found at http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wpcontent/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNI_Acknow-ledgement_List.pdf.

Funding

The study is partially supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82271607, 81830059, 81301139), the Special Sub Project of Strategic Leading Science and Technology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA12040101), the Clinical Research Center Project of Shanghai Mental Health Center (CRC2017ZD02), and the National Science and Technology Support Program of China (2009BAI77B03).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Lin Sun, Jie Zhang, and Wei Li have contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Center, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 600 South Wanping Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China

    Lin Sun, Wei Li, Jianhua Sheng & Shifu Xiao

  2. Key Laboratory of Spine and Spinal Cord Injury Repair and Regeneration of Ministry of Education, Orthopedic Department of Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

    Jie Zhang

Authors
  1. Lin Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jie Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jianhua Sheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shifu Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Contributions

SL designed and drafted the manuscript. SL, ZJ, and LW analyzed the data. XSF and SJH supervised the experiment. The ADNI database provided data support for this study. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lin Sun, Jianhua Sheng or Shifu Xiao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Data collection and sharing in the ADNI were approved by the institutional review boards of all participating institutions. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants or their legal guardians in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

All subjects provided written consent to publish the findings.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

 Supplementary description about included subjects and scale assessment.

Additional file 2.

 Flow chart of the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Additional file 3.

 Supplementary methods for calculating hippocampal volume.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, L., Zhang, J., Li, W. et al. Neutrophil activation may trigger tau burden contributing to cognitive progression of chronic sleep disturbance in elderly individuals not living with dementia. BMC Med 21, 205 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-02910-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-02910-x

Keywords

BMC Medicine

ISSN: 1741-7015

Contact us